# TMEP § 601.01(c)(i): Determining the Acceptability of Domicile Addresses

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/TMEP_S601.01(c)(i)

## Section

- **Citation:** TMEP § 601.01(c)(i)
- **Heading:** Determining the Acceptability of Domicile Addresses
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** USPTO TMEP / Chapter 0600 - Attorney, Representative, Correspondence, and Signature / TMEP § 601.01(c)(i)

## Text

Addresses that do not identify an actual street
address or that function as a mail forwarding address are presumptively
unacceptable as domicile addresses.
Such addresses include post-office (P.O.) boxes,
"care of" (c/o) addresses, commercial mail receiving agency (CMRA) addresses,
registered agent (RA) addresses, private mailboxes (PMB), Army Post Office (APO)
addresses, Fleet Post Office (FPO) addresses, Diplomatic Post Office (DPO)
addresses, and Highway Contract Route (HCR or HC) addresses. These addresses,
along with virtual office and shared workspace addresses, can be a mailing
address, but generally may not serve as domicile addresses because they do not
identify the location of the place the person resides and intends to be the
person’s principal home (for a natural person) or the location of a juristic
entity’s headquarters where the entity’s senior executives or officers ordinarily
direct and control the entity’s activities (for a juristic entity).
Examining attorneys and post-registration examiners
are not required to confirm or research a listed domicile address in the initial
application or maintenance filing, but they must require the applicant or
registrant to provide an acceptable domicile address if:
(1) it is apparent that the address is an
unacceptable type of domicile address (e.g., P.O. box, c/o, PMB, APO, FPO,
DPO, HCR or HC appears in the address); or
(2) the examining attorney receives specific
guidance that the domicile address should not be accepted.
Examining attorneys and post-registration examiners
must also require a domicile address if an applicant or registrant fails to
provide a street address entirely or provides a clearly invalid address (e.g., 123
Street Name, Your City, State, 12345).
Examining attorneys and post-registration examiners
must require an acceptable domicile address even if the applicant or registrant
provided the unacceptable domicile address in the masked “Domicile Address” field
equire a domicile address if an applicant or registrant fails to
provide a street address entirely or provides a clearly invalid address (e.g., 123
Street Name, Your City, State, 12345).
Examining attorneys and post-registration examiners
must require an acceptable domicile address even if the applicant or registrant
provided the unacceptable domicile address in the masked “Domicile Address” field.
In such cases, an examining attorney or post-registration examiner should not list
the exact address in the Office action. However, if evidence is being attached to
the Office action to support the inquiry, an examining attorney may attach
evidence that identifies the address if necessary. Applicant may then later
petition the USPTO to have that information redacted.
No requirement for a street address should be made
to U.S. government entities or federally recognized American Indian and Alaska
Native tribes with a U.S. post-office box address. In addition, although APO, FPO,
and DPO addresses are presumptively unacceptable as a domicile address, such
addresses are considered U.S. addresses even if located in a foreign country.
Domicile address may not be obtained by
examiner’s amendment
. Not all applicants understand that domicile
address information entered by examiner’s amendment will become part of the public
record. Therefore, examining attorneys may not obtain and enter an applicant’s
domicile address by examiner’s amendment, even if the applicant indicates an
understanding that domicile information entered in this manner will not be hidden
or “masked.”

## Nearby sections

- [TMEP § 601 Requirement for Representation Based on Domicile of Mark Owner](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/TMEP_S601.md)
- [TMEP § 601.01 Determining an Owner’s Domicile](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/TMEP_S601.01.md)
- [TMEP § 601.01(a) Owners with a Non-U.S. Domicile](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/TMEP_S601.01(a).md)
- [TMEP § 601.01(b) Owners with a U.S. Domicile](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/TMEP_S601.01(b).md)
- [TMEP § 601.01(c)(i) Determining the Acceptability of Domicile Addresses](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/TMEP_S601.01(c)(i).md)
- [TMEP § 601.01(c)(ii) Evaluating a New Domicile Address Provided in Response to a Domicile Address Requirement](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/TMEP_S601.01(c)(ii).md)
- [TMEP § 601.01(c)(iii) Reviewing General Arguments or Evidence Provided in Response to a Domicile Address Requirement](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/TMEP_S601.01(c)(iii).md)
- [TMEP § 601.01(c)(iv) Reviewing “No Fixed Physical Address” Explanation](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/TMEP_S601.01(c)(iv).md)
- [TMEP § 601.01(c)(iv)(A) Response Options for Applicants or Registrants with “No Fixed Physical Address”](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/TMEP_S601.01(c)(iv)(A).md)
- [TMEP § 601.01(c)(iv)(B) Reviewing the Name, Title, and Domicile Address of an Individual with Legal Authority to Bind the Juristic Entity](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/TMEP_S601.01(c)(iv)(B).md)
- [TMEP § 601.01(c)(v) Checking the Record for a Petition to the Director to Waive the Domicile Address Requirement](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/TMEP_S601.01(c)(v).md)
- [TMEP § 601.01(d) Domicile Address Must Be Kept Current](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/TMEP_S601.01(d).md)
- [TMEP § 601.01(e) Hiding the Domicile Address](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/TMEP_S601.01(e).md)
- [TMEP § 601.02 Communications with Applicant or Registrant Who Is Represented by an Attorney](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/TMEP_S601.02.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/TMEP_S601.01(c)(i). Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.
