# Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1002: View Statute 25-1002 > Nebraska · Statutes · In force URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/STATE_NE_C25_S25-1002 ## Section - **Citation:** Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1002 - **Heading:** View Statute 25-1002 - **Jurisdiction:** Nebraska - **Kind:** Statutes - **Status:** In force - **Text as of:** August 14, 2026 - **Source:** Compiled text - **Location:** NE Code / Chapter 25 / Section 25-1002 ## Text An order of attachment shall be approved by a judge of any district court or county court only after there has been presented to him or her an affidavit or affidavits based upon personal knowledge (1) that the facts set forth in plaintiff's complaint which state a valid cause of action and the amount plaintiff is entitled to recover are true, (2) describing the existence and approximate value of any of defendant's property known to the plaintiff to be subject to the jurisdiction of the court, and (3) stating specific facts demonstrating reasonable cause that one or more of the grounds for an attachment enumerated in section 25-1001 exist. R.S.1867, Code § 199, p. 425; Laws 1911, c. 168, § 2, p. 545; R.S.1913, § 7733; C.S.1922, § 8677; C.S.1929, § 20-1002; R.S.1943, § 25-1002; Laws 1980, LB 597, § 2; Laws 1984, LB 13, § 36; Laws 1991, LB 732, § 42; Laws 2002, LB 876, § 19. 1. By whom made 1. By whom made 2. Nature of claim 2. Nature of claim 3. Miscellaneous 3. Miscellaneous 1. By whom made 1. By whom made In affidavit for garnishment affiant should swear to the fact that he is plaintiff, agent or attorney. Crawford State Bank v. Murphy, 142 Neb. 795, 7 N.W.2d 762 (1943). In affidavit for garnishment affiant should swear to the fact that he is plaintiff, agent or attorney. Crawford State Bank v. Murphy, 142 Neb. 795, 7 N.W.2d 762 (1943). Affidavit taken before plaintiff's attorney is bad, but is amendable. Dobry v. Western Mfg. Co., 57 Neb. 228, 77 N.W. 656 (1898). Affidavit taken before plaintiff's attorney is bad, but is amendable. Dobry v. Western Mfg. Co., 57 Neb. 228, 77 N.W. 656 (1898). Affidavit must distinctly show it was made by natural person. Clements & Co. v. Puckett, 1 Neb. Unof. 356, 95 N.W. 796 (1901). Affidavit must distinctly show it was made by natural person. Clements & Co. v. Puckett, 1 Neb. Unof. 356, 95 N.W. 796 (1901). 2. Nature of claim 2. Nature of claim Where attachment is issued for total claimed in five counts, and one count is dismissed, attachment should be dissolved. First Nat. Bank of Greenwood v. Van Doren, 68 Neb. 142, 93 N.W. 1017 (1903). Where attachment is issued for total claimed in five counts, and one count is dismissed, attachment should be dissolved. First Nat. Bank of Greenwood v. Van Doren, 68 Neb. 142, 93 N.W. 1017 (1903). Slight variance in amounts claimed in petition and affidavit is immaterial. Grotte v. Nagle, 50 Neb. 363, 69 N.W. 973 (1897). Slight variance in amounts claimed in petition and affidavit is immaterial. Grotte v. Nagle, 50 Neb. 363, 69 N.W. 973 (1897). Affidavit in language of statute is sufficient. Burnham v. Ramge, 47 Neb. 175, 66 N.W. 277 (1896). Affidavit in language of statute is sufficient. Burnham v. Ramge, 47 Neb. 175, 66 N.W. 277 (1896). Where several grounds are joined, should be alleged in conjunctive. Tessier v. Englehart & Co., 18 Neb. 167, 24 N.W. 734 (1885). Where several grounds are joined, should be alleged in conjunctive. Tessier v. Englehart & Co., 18 Neb. 167, 24 N.W. 734 (1885). Affidavit need not state cause of action; condensed statement of nature of claim is sufficient. Dorrington v. Minnick, 15 Neb. 397, 19 N.W. 456 (1884). Affidavit need not state cause of action; condensed statement of nature of claim is sufficient. Dorrington v. Minnick, 15 Neb. 397, 19 N.W. 456 (1884). Affidavit upon a promissory note described in petition was sufficient. Livingston v. Coe, 4 Neb. 379 (1876). Affidavit upon a promissory note described in petition was sufficient. Livingston v. Coe, 4 Neb. 379 (1876). Mere statement that defendant is nonresident of this state is sufficient. Citizens State Bank of Wood River v. Porter, 4 Neb. Unof. 73, 93 N.W. 391 (1903). Mere statement that defendant is nonresident of this state is sufficient. Citizens State Bank of Wood River v. Porter, 4 Neb. Unof. 73, 93 N.W. 391 (1903). 3. Miscellaneous 3. Miscellaneous sufficient. Livingston v. Coe, 4 Neb. 379 (1876). Mere statement that defendant is nonresident of this state is sufficient. Citizens State Bank of Wood River v. Porter, 4 Neb. Unof. 73, 93 N.W. 391 (1903). Mere statement that defendant is nonresident of this state is sufficient. Citizens State Bank of Wood River v. Porter, 4 Neb. Unof. 73, 93 N.W. 391 (1903). 3. Miscellaneous 3. Miscellaneous Affidavit of attachment is required in garnishment proceedings. Insurance Co. of North America v. Maxim's of Nebraska, 178 Neb. 274, 132 N.W.2d 885 (1965). Affidavit of attachment is required in garnishment proceedings. Insurance Co. of North America v. Maxim's of Nebraska, 178 Neb. 274, 132 N.W.2d 885 (1965). Burden rests upon plaintiff to sustain requirements of statute. National Reefer Service, Inc. v. Felman, 164 Neb. 783, 83 N.W.2d 547 (1957). Burden rests upon plaintiff to sustain requirements of statute. National Reefer Service, Inc. v. Felman, 164 Neb. 783, 83 N.W.2d 547 (1957). Amendable even after motion to quash. Clarke Banking Co. v. Wright, 37 Neb. 382, 55 N.W. 1060 (1893). Amendable even after motion to quash. Clarke Banking Co. v. Wright, 37 Neb. 382, 55 N.W. 1060 (1893). Attachment may be obtained pending appeal. Strickler v. Hargis, 34 Neb. 468, 51 N.W. 1039 (1892). Attachment may be obtained pending appeal. Strickler v. Hargis, 34 Neb. 468, 51 N.W. 1039 (1892). Plaintiff may supply defects in affidavit for publication of service. Miller v. Eastman, 27 Neb. 408, 43 N.W. 179 (1889). Plaintiff may supply defects in affidavit for publication of service. Miller v. Eastman, 27 Neb. 408, 43 N.W. 179 (1889). One affidavit is sufficient to cover successive orders of attachment. Thompson v. Stetson, 15 Neb. 112, 17 N.W. 368 (1883). One affidavit is sufficient to cover successive orders of attachment. Thompson v. Stetson, 15 Neb. 112, 17 N.W. 368 (1883). Omission of venue cannot be attacked in collateral action. Crowell v. Johnson, 2 Neb. 146 (1873). Omission of venue cannot be attacked in collateral action. Crowell v. Johnson, 2 Neb. 146 (1873). ## Nearby sections - [Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-911 13-911](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/STATE_NE_C25_S13-911.md) - [Neb. Rev. Stat. § 23-1701.03 23-1701.03](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/STATE_NE_C25_S23-1701.03.md) - [Neb. Rev. Stat. § 23-1701.05 23-1701.05](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/STATE_NE_C25_S23-1701.05.md) - [Neb. Rev. Stat. § 23-1701.06 23-1701.06](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/STATE_NE_C25_S23-1701.06.md) - [Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-101 View Statute 25-101](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/STATE_NE_C25_S25-101.md) - [Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-103 View Statute 25-103](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/STATE_NE_C25_S25-103.md) - [Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-201 View Statute 25-201](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/STATE_NE_C25_S25-201.md) - [Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-201.01 View Statute 25-201.01](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/STATE_NE_C25_S25-201.01.md) - [Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-202 View Statute 25-202](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/STATE_NE_C25_S25-202.md) - [Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-207 View Statute 25-207](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/STATE_NE_C25_S25-207.md) - [Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-213 View Statute 25-213](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/STATE_NE_C25_S25-213.md) - [Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-214 View Statute 25-214](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/STATE_NE_C25_S25-214.md) - [Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-219 View Statute 25-219](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/STATE_NE_C25_S25-219.md) - [Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-223 View Statute 25-223](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/STATE_NE_C25_S25-223.md) --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/STATE_NE_C25_S25-1002. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.