# SSR 72-14c: SSR 72-14c: Rescinded

> Federal · Rulings · Rescinded

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_72_14c

## Section

- **Citation:** SSR 72-14c
- **Heading:** SSR 72-14c: Rescinded
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Rulings
- **Status:** Rescinded
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** Social Security Rulings / OASI / Attorney Fees / SSR 72-14c

## Text

Rescinded September 14, 2018 by FR Vol. 83, No. 179, page 46771

20 CFR 404.975-404.977a

SSR 72-14c

Schneider v. Richardson , 441 F.2d 1320 (6th Cir. 4/28/71);
petition for certiorari to Untied States Supreme Court denied 10/12/71

Held , under section 206(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
406(a)), the amount of an attorney's fee allowed by the Secretary for
services performed at the administrative level is a matter legally
committed to the Secretary's discretion and not subject to judicial
review.

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff-appellant, Morton E. Schneider, an attorney,
represented a social security claimant at an administrative hearing who
was awarded benefits in the amount of $11,233.70. He then filed a petition
with the hearing examiner requesting approval of a $2,808.42 legal fee,
being twenty-five per cent of the benefits awarded. The hearing examiner
allowed a fee of $500 and following an administrative appeal as authorized
by 200 C.F.R. 404.975(e), the Appeals Council affirmed. The appellant then
brought this action in District Court seeking judicial review. He alleges
that his client had agreed to pay him a twenty-five per cent contingent
fee, and further that he was required to spend some fourteen hours in
preparing and presenting his client's case and an additional two hours in
preparing his own petition for a fee. He brands the fee award of the
Secretary as an abuse of discretion because of its alleged
inadequacy. [1]

The District Court dismissed the action on the grounds that it lacked
jurisdiction. This appeal followed and raises the single issue of whether
the Social Security Act precludes judicial review of legal fees awarded by
the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare to an attorney who has
represented a social security claimant at the administrative level. We
affirm the District Court's dismissal of the action.
missed the action on the grounds that it lacked
jurisdiction. This appeal followed and raises the single issue of whether
the Social Security Act precludes judicial review of legal fees awarded by
the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare to an attorney who has
represented a social security claimant at the administrative level. We
affirm the District Court's dismissal of the action.

Appellant contends that the Secretary's award of legal fees is judicially
reviewable under 5 U.S.C. � 704 of the Administrative Procedure Act
providing in part that "(a)gency action made reviewable by statute and
final agency action for which there is no other adequate remedy in a court
are subject to judicial review. . . . However, 5 U.S.C. � 701(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act clearly establishes two exceptions to the
provisions for judicial review of agency action provided in Section 704.
One exception is where "statutes preclude judicial review" and the other,
directly on point in this case, is where "agency action is committed to
agency discretion by law."

Section 403(a) [2] [206(a)] of
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. � 406(a)) commits to the discretion of
the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare the setting of legal fees
for administrative representation of social security claimants. In a
factual situation similar to the present case in Chernock v. Gardner , 360 F.2d 257 (3rd Cir. 1966), it was held ". . . the
setting of fees for representation of claimants before the Secretary is
committed to that agency's discretion by Section 206 of the Social
Security Act, and judicial review is therefore precluded by Section 10 of
the Administrative Procedure Act. .
claimants. In a
factual situation similar to the present case in Chernock v. Gardner , 360 F.2d 257 (3rd Cir. 1966), it was held ". . . the
setting of fees for representation of claimants before the Secretary is
committed to that agency's discretion by Section 206 of the Social
Security Act, and judicial review is therefore precluded by Section 10 of
the Administrative Procedure Act. . . ." This decision in Chernock that the amount of an attorney's fee for services performed at the
administrative level is a matter of discretion with the Secretary and is
not subject to judicial review has been cited with approval in recent
cases involving attorneys fees for representation in the district courts. Finix v. Finch , _____ F.2d _____ (1st Cir. 1971); Canner v. Gardner, 381 F.2d 497 (4th Cir. 1967); Robinson v. Gardner , 374 F.2d 949 (4th Cir. 1967); Gardner v. Menendez , 373 F.2d 488 (1st Cir. 1967).

Affirmed.

[1] Because of our disposition
of this case, we do not reach this issue.

[2] Section 406(a) of the Social
Security Act provides in part ". . . [t]he Secretary may, by rule and
regulations, prescribe the maximum fees which may be charged for services
performed in connection with any claim before the Secretary under this
subchapter, and any agreement in violation of such rules and regulations
shall be void."

## Nearby sections

- [SSR 65-33c SSR 65-33c: Rescinded](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_65_33c.md)
- [SSR 67-54c SSR 67-54c: Rescinded](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_67_54c.md)
- [SSR 68-47c SSR 68-47c: Rescinded](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_68_47c.md)
- [SSR 68-61c SSR 68-61c: SECTION 206(b)(1). -- REPRESENTATION OF CLAIMANT IN COURT PROCEEDINGS -- FIXING AMOUNT OF ATTORNEY'S FEE](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_68_61c.md)
- [SSR 71-23c SSR 71-23c: Rescinded](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_71_23c.md)
- [SSR 72-14c SSR 72-14c: Rescinded](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_72_14c.md)
- [SSR 72-31c SSR 72-31c: Rescinded](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_72_31c.md)
- [SSR 74-29 SSR 74-29: SECTION 206 (42 U.S.C. 406) -- REPRESENTATION OF CLAIMANT -- DISQUALIFICATION OF NONATTORNEY -- DUE PROCESS REQUIRES NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_74_29.md)
- [SSR 78-14 SSR 78-14: Rescinded 1984](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_78_14.md)
- [SSR 82-39 SSR 82-39: TITLES II AND XVI -- USE OF TRUST OR ESCROW ACCOUNTS IN COLLECTION OF ATTORNEY FEES](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_82_39.md)
- [SSR 83-27 SSR 83-27: SECTIONS 206(a) AND 1631(d)(2) (42 U.S.C. 406(a) AND 1383(d)(2)) ATTORNEY FEES--DETERMINATION AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES IN CONCURRENT TITLE II-TITLE XVI CLAIMS](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_83_27.md)
- [SSR 85-3 SSR 85-3: Rescinded](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_85_3.md)
- [SSR 86-9c SSR 86-9c: SECTIONS 206 AND 1127 OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT (42 U.S.C. 406 AND 1320a-6) ATTORNEY FEES -- DETERMINING PAST-DUE BENEFITS -- APPLICABILITY OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME OFFSET PROVISION](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_86_9c.md)
- [SSR 86-10c SSR 86-10c: Rescinded](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_86_10c.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_72_14c. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.