# SSR 70-13: SSR 70-13: SECTIONS 217(a)(1)(B) and 217(e)(1)(B). -- VETERANS -- GRATUITOUS MILITARY SERVICE WAGE CREDITS -- USE PRECLUDED IF PREVIOUSLY CREDITED FOR NONREGULAR MILITARY SERVICE RETIRED PAY > Federal · Rulings · In force URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_70_13 ## Section - **Citation:** SSR 70-13 - **Heading:** SSR 70-13: SECTIONS 217(a)(1)(B) and 217(e)(1)(B). -- VETERANS -- GRATUITOUS MILITARY SERVICE WAGE CREDITS -- USE PRECLUDED IF PREVIOUSLY CREDITED FOR NONREGULAR MILITARY SERVICE RETIRED PAY - **Jurisdiction:** Federal - **Kind:** Rulings - **Status:** In force - **Text as of:** August 14, 2026 - **Source:** Compiled text - **Location:** Social Security Rulings / OASI / Benefits in Case of Veterans / SSR 70-13 ## Text 20 CFR 404.1310 SSR 70-13 Section 217(a)(1) of the Social Security Act provides in pertinent part as follows: * * * * * * * * Section 217(e)(1) of the Act makes a similar provision for post-World War II service, i.e., for the period on or after July 25, 1947, and prior to January 1, 1957. Chapter 67 of Title 10, United States Code (10 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.) provides for the payment of retired pay for nonregular, i.e., as a reservist, military service. 10 U.S.C. 1336 specifically provides: Under Chapter 67, an eligibility requirement for benefits is a period of active service during World War I, World War II, or the Korean Conflict. Literally read, 10 U.S.C. 1336 would seem to require the crediting of military service for purposes of any Federal retirement benefit based on civilian employment, even though such service is also used to determine an individual's eligibility for, or the amount of, a retirement benefit payable under Chapter 67. Because this section appears to be in conflict with sections 217(a)(1)(B) and 217(e)(1)(B) of the Act, the question raised was whether retired pay for nonregular military service payable under 10 U.S.C 1331 et seq., is an exception to the restriction in sections 217(a)(1)(B) and 217(e)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act against the granting of gratuitous wage credits for military service where another Federal benefit (except one paid by the Veterans' Administration) is payable on the basis of that same service. Section 1336, 10 U.S.C. originally came into law as section 305 of title III, PL 80-810, the "Army and Air Force Vitalization and Retirement Equalization Act of 1948." This Act was passed to provide an incentive for reservists to remain active. Section 305 of this Act originally read: On August 10, 1956, PL 84-1028 revised, codified, and enacted into law, Title 10 of the United States Code entitled "Armed Forces." Under this codification section 1336 was revised to read substantially as shown above. talization and Retirement Equalization Act of 1948." This Act was passed to provide an incentive for reservists to remain active. Section 305 of this Act originally read: On August 10, 1956, PL 84-1028 revised, codified, and enacted into law, Title 10 of the United States Code entitled "Armed Forces." Under this codification section 1336 was revised to read substantially as shown above. Section 217(a)(1) of the Act was enacted on August 28, 1950, and amended in 1952 and 1954. Section 217(e)(1) was enacted on July 18, 1952, and amended in 1953, 1954, 1955, and 1956 to extend the period of military service for which gratuitous wage credits could be given. The last such amendment, on August 1, 1956, was enacted into law shortly before the codification of Title 10 of the United States Code by the same Congress which enacted 10 U.S.C. 1336. Under the general rules of statutory construction, when two conflicting provisions enacted by a legislative body are irreconcilable (assuming the subject provisions are irreconcilable) the later act will prevail. Although 10 U.S.C. 1336 was enacted shortly after the last amendment to section 217 of the Act, it was in substance the same as section 305 of Public Law 80-810 as initially enacted in 1948. For reasons appearing below, it may reasonably be concluded that sections 217(a)(1)(B) and 217(e)(1)(B) prevail over 10 U.S.C. 1336. It is clear that in cases involving construction of acts of Congress, the manifest intent of Congress will prevail over general rules of statutory construction. Sutherland, Statutes and Statutory Construction § 4501 (3d ed., 1943); 82 C.J.S. Statutes, § 321; Sinclair Refining Company v. Atkinson, 370 U.S. 195 (1962). at sections 217(a)(1)(B) and 217(e)(1)(B) prevail over 10 U.S.C. 1336. It is clear that in cases involving construction of acts of Congress, the manifest intent of Congress will prevail over general rules of statutory construction. Sutherland, Statutes and Statutory Construction § 4501 (3d ed., 1943); 82 C.J.S. Statutes, § 321; Sinclair Refining Company v. Atkinson, 370 U.S. 195 (1962). It appears that Congress did not intend, by the repeal of section 305 of Public Law 80-810 (the predecessor section of 10 U.S.C. 1336) and its reenactment as 10 U.S.C. 1336, to nullify any of the limitations on the crediting of military service contained in section 217(a)(1)(B) and 217(e)(1)(B) of the Act. While the legislative history of Public Law 84-1028, enacting the codification of Title 10, is very brief and does not specifically mention 10 U.S.C. 1336, it is clear that no substantial change in the law was intended. In fact, section 49(a) of P.L. 84-1028 provides "* * * it is the legislative purpose to restate, without substantive change, the law replaced by those sections on the effective date of this Act." The view that Congress did not intend to, in any way, limit the scope of sections 217(a)(1)(B) and 217(e)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act is further supported by the fact that the same Congress which enacted 10 U.S.C. 1336 had amended section 217(e)(1)(B) 9 days earlier; they could hardly have intended to repeal pro tanto a statute they had just amended. On the other hand, the legislative history of sections 217(a)(1)(B) and 217(e)(1)(B) is very detailed and specific. In particular, Sen. Rep. No. 1669, 81st Cong., 2d Sess., at p. 110, states: Also, with reference to section 217(e)(1)(B), Sen. Rep. No. 1806, 82d Cong., 2d Sess., pp. 6 and 22-23 (1952), and H.R. Rep. No. 1944, 82d Cong., 2d Sess., state, at page 6: hey had just amended. On the other hand, the legislative history of sections 217(a)(1)(B) and 217(e)(1)(B) is very detailed and specific. In particular, Sen. Rep. No. 1669, 81st Cong., 2d Sess., at p. 110, states: Also, with reference to section 217(e)(1)(B), Sen. Rep. No. 1806, 82d Cong., 2d Sess., pp. 6 and 22-23 (1952), and H.R. Rep. No. 1944, 82d Cong., 2d Sess., state, at page 6: It seems clear that Congress was specifically concerned with preventing the gratuitous crediting for social security benefit purposes of military service used for purposes of another Federal retirement system. By codifying the language of a general statute which antedated the language of a very specific statute, it is reasonable to believe that Congress did not intend to repeal the latter statute. As a general principle of law, a specific statute will control over a general one without regard to priority of enactment. For example, Panama Canal Co. v. Anderson, 312 F.2d 98 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied 375 U.S. 832 (1963), holds that where there is a conflict between a statute dealing with limited subject matter and a general statute, the more specific statute will control over the general statute even though the general statute was enacted more recently. See also, Bulova Watch Co. v. United States, 365 U.S. 753 (1961). Furthermore, it is desirable, if at all possible, that statutes be construed to avoid conflict. Such an interpretation of section 217 and 10 U.S.C. 1336 may, therefore, be justified. The latter statute states, in pertinent part, that no period of service used in connection with Chapter 67 retired pay may be excluded in determining a person's eligibility for, or the amount of, any annuity, pension, or old-age benefit under any law, "if that service is otherwise properly credited under it." This may be interpreted to exclude the Social Security Act from the operation of 10 U.S.C statute states, in pertinent part, that no period of service used in connection with Chapter 67 retired pay may be excluded in determining a person's eligibility for, or the amount of, any annuity, pension, or old-age benefit under any law, "if that service is otherwise properly credited under it." This may be interpreted to exclude the Social Security Act from the operation of 10 U.S.C. 1336, where military service is not "otherwise credited" under the Act because of the prohibition in sections 217(a)(1)(B) and 217(e)(1)(B). Accordingly, it is held that sections 217(a)(1)(B) and 217(e)(1)(B) of the Act preclude the granting of gratuitous wage credits for any military service during World War II of the post-World War II period of July 25, 1947, to January 1, 1957, when such military service is used to determine eligibility for, or the amount of, benefits under Chapter 67 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code. ## Nearby sections - [SSR 60-16 SSR 60-16. MILITARY SERVICE WAGE CREDITS -- SERVICE IN THE WOMEN'S ARMY AUXILIARY CORPS (WAAC)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_60_16.md) - [SSR 61-49 SSR 61-49. MILITARY SERVICE WAGE CREDITS -- EFFECT OF BENEFIT AWARDED BY ANOTHER FEDERAL AGENCY](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_61_49.md) - [SSR 62-13 SSR 62-13. VETERANS -- MILITARY SERVICE WAGE CREDITS -- EFFECT OF CORRECTION OF ARMY RECORDS](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_62_13.md) - [SSR 63-29 SSR 63-29: SECTIONS 202, 215, AND 217. -- COMPUTATION OF BENEFITS -- USE OF MILITARY SERVICE WAGE CREDITS](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_63_29.md) - [SSR 64-12 SSR 64-12: SECTION 217(h). -- MILITARY SERVICE WAGE CREDITS -- MILITARY SERVICE FOR POLISH GOVERNMENT-IN-EXILE DURING WORLD WAR II](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_64_12.md) - [SSR 64-15 SSR 64-15: P.L. 87-574 (76 Stat. 308). -- STATUS OF SERVICES PERFORMED BY PATIENTS AND MEMBERS IN VA HOSPITALS](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_64_15.md) - [SSR 64-64 SSR 64-64: SECTIONS 217(a). -- VETERANS -- MILITARY SERVICE WAGE CREDITS -- EFFECT OF BENEFIT AWARDED BY ANOTHER FEDERAL AGENCY](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_64_64.md) - [SSR 68-11 SSR 68-11: SECTIONS 217(a), 217(d), and 217(e). -- VETERANS -- MILITARY SERVICE WAGE CREDITS -- PRESIDENTIAL PARDON AFTER DISHONORABLE DISCHARGE](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_68_11.md) - [SSR 69-47 SSR 69-47: SECTION 229(a). -- DEDUCTIONS -- MILITARY SERVICE WAGE CREDITS -- STATUS OF DEEMED WAGES FOR DEDUCTION PURPOSES](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_69_47.md) - [SSR 70-13 SSR 70-13: SECTIONS 217(a)(1)(B) and 217(e)(1)(B). -- VETERANS -- GRATUITOUS MILITARY SERVICE WAGE CREDITS -- USE PRECLUDED IF PREVIOUSLY CREDITED FOR NONREGULAR MILITARY SERVICE RETIRED PAY](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_70_13.md) --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_70_13. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.