# SSR 67-27: SSR 67-27: SECTION 218(s). -- STATE AND LOCAL COVERAGE -- COMMISSIONER'S RULING ON STATE'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW -- SERVICES FOR COUNTY AS NIGHT WATCHMAN

> Federal · Rulings · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_67_27

## Section

- **Citation:** SSR 67-27
- **Heading:** SSR 67-27: SECTION 218(s). -- STATE AND LOCAL COVERAGE -- COMMISSIONER'S RULING ON STATE'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW -- SERVICES FOR COUNTY AS NIGHT WATCHMAN
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Rulings
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** Social Security Rulings / OASI / Voluntary Agreements for Coverage of State and Local Employees / SSR 67-27

## Text

20 CFR 404.1270-404.1274

SSR 67-27

Section 218(s) of the Social Security Act, as amended, provides that
where an assessment of an amount due by a State under a Federal-State
agreement pursuant to section 218 has been made or a State's claim for a
credit or refund of an overpayment under such agreement has been
disallowed, or a State has been allowed a credit or refund of an
overpayment under such agreement, the Secretary shall, upon written
request filed by the State within a stipulated time, review such
assessment, disallowance or allowance and shall render a decision
affirming, modifying, or reversing such assessment, disallowance, or
allowance stating the basis therefor. The Secretary has delegated to the
Commissioner of Social Security authority to make reviews and findings and
to give notice of his findings as required by section 218(s).

The State of Missouri timely requested a review pursuant to section
218(s) of the assessment made pursuant to the Administration's
determination that the wage earner's services as a night watchman guarding
attached property which was the subject of pending litigation were
performed as an employee of Jasper County, Missouri, and covered under the
State's agreement with the Secretary made pursuant to section 218.

The facts in this matter are that the wage earner was engaged by the
sheriff of Jasper County, Missouri, on May 2, 1962, pursuant to an order
of the Circuit Court of Jasper County to guard property seized under levy
sold to satisfy a judgment of the court. The wage earner performed
services as a night watchman until July 2, 1962. During this period he
worked on a regular basis from 7:00 p.m. until 7:00 a.m. each day. The
wage earner and the day watchman were each required to work 12 hours a day
so that a 24 hour guard was maintained, but the specific hours worked were
agreed upon between them
levy
sold to satisfy a judgment of the court. The wage earner performed
services as a night watchman until July 2, 1962. During this period he
worked on a regular basis from 7:00 p.m. until 7:00 a.m. each day. The
wage earner and the day watchman were each required to work 12 hours a day
so that a 24 hour guard was maintained, but the specific hours worked were
agreed upon between them. The wage earner received instructions as to how
to perform his duties from the sheriff, who had the right to change his
methods or otherwise direct him as to how to do the work. The wage earner
was paid at a fixed hourly rate of $1.50 and received a total of $981.00
for his services. This amount was derived from the proceeds of the sale
and charged as a cost of the action.

There is no disagreement as to these facts. It is the State's view,
however, that the sheriff hired and directed the wage earner in the
performance of his duties on behalf of and in the interest of the lienor.
The State consequently holds that the wage earner was an employee of the
lienor. In addition, the State contends that the wage earner could not
legally be an employee of the county since approval of his appointment by
the county court, as required by State law, was not obtained.

The Commissioner reviewed the assessment made and determined that the
wage earner was hired by the sheriff to assist in the performance of the
sheriff's official duties and that the obtaining of such assistance was
authorized both by statute and by the court having jurisdiction over the
res in which assistance was required. The Commissioner also found that the
wage earner was subject to direction and control by the sheriff over the
methods by which he performed his duties
hired by the sheriff to assist in the performance of the
sheriff's official duties and that the obtaining of such assistance was
authorized both by statute and by the court having jurisdiction over the
res in which assistance was required. The Commissioner also found that the
wage earner was subject to direction and control by the sheriff over the
methods by which he performed his duties. Accordingly, the Commissioner
found that the wage earner was an employee of Jasper County with respect
to services he performed as a night watchman even though the technical
provisions of the statute relative to hiring an individual may not have
been followed exactly. On the basis of this finding, the Commissioner
affirmed the assessment.

## Nearby sections

- [SSR 63-51c SSR 63-51c: SECTION 218. -- STATE AND LOCAL COVERAGE -- EMPLOYEE OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_63_51c.md)
- [SSR 63-52c SSR 63-52c: SECTION 218. -- EMPLOYEE OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_63_52c.md)
- [SSR 65-57 SSR 65-57: SECTION 218(s). -- STATE AND LOCAL COVERAGE -- COMMISSIONER'S RULING ON STATE'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_65_57.md)
- [SSR 67-12 SSR 67-12: SECTION 218(s). -- STATE AND LOCAL COVERAGE -- COMMISSIONER'S RULING ON STATE'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW -- INDIANA SCHOOL BUS DRIVERS](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_67_12.md)
- [SSR 67-13 SSR 67-13: SECTION 218(s). -- STATE AND LOCAL COVERAGE -- COMMISSIONER'S RULING ON STATE'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW -- SERVICES FOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_67_13.md)
- [SSR 67-27 SSR 67-27: SECTION 218(s). -- STATE AND LOCAL COVERAGE -- COMMISSIONER'S RULING ON STATE'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW -- SERVICES FOR COUNTY AS NIGHT WATCHMAN](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_67_27.md)
- [SSR 67-44 SSR 67-44: SECTION 218(s). -- STATE AND LOCAL COVERAGE -- COMMISSIONER'S RULING ON STATE'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW -- NEBRASKA CONSTABLES AND JUSTICES OF THE PEACE](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_67_44.md)
- [SSR 68-23 SSR 68-23: SECTION 218(a) and (c). -- STATE AND LOCAL COVERAGE -- STATUS OF MOTOR LICENSE AGENTS IN OKLAHOMA](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_68_23.md)
- [SSR 68-24 SSR 68-24: Rescinded 1984](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_68_24.md)
- [SSR 68-34 SSR 68-34: Rescinded 1984](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_68_34.md)
- [SSR 68-35 SSR 68-35: Rescinded 1984](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_68_35.md)
- [SSR 68-51 SSR 68-51: Rescinded 1984](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_68_51.md)
- [SSR 68-77 SSR 68-77: SECTION 218(d), (f), and (g). -- STATE AND LOCAL COVERAGE -- EFFECT ON COVERAGE OF FAILURE OF EMPLOYEE TO PAY CONTRIBUTION -- MEMBER OF DIVIDED COVERAGE GROUP -- RHODE ISLAND](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_68_77.md)
- [SSR 69-7 SSR 69-7: SECTION 218(s). -- STATE AND LOCAL COVERAGE -- COMMISSIONER'S RULING ON STATE'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW -- WEST VIRGINIA -- POLICEMEN OF CITY OF NEW MARTINSVILLE](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_69_7.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_OASI_SSR_67_27. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.
