# SSR 71-30: SSR 71-30: SECTIONS 413(a), 413(b), AND 422(d), FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969; SECTIONS 223(a), 223(b), and 224(a), SOCIAL SECURITY ACT -- DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS -- BLACK LUNG BENEFITS -- MONTHLY PAYMENT PERIOD

> Federal · Rulings · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_DI_SSR_71_30

## Section

- **Citation:** SSR 71-30
- **Heading:** SSR 71-30: SECTIONS 413(a), 413(b), AND 422(d), FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969; SECTIONS 223(a), 223(b), and 224(a), SOCIAL SECURITY ACT -- DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS -- BLACK LUNG BENEFITS -- MONTHLY PAYMENT PERIOD
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Rulings
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** Social Security Rulings / DI / Black Lung Benefits / SSR 71-30

## Text

20 CFR 410.501

SSR 71-30

The Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969 (Public Law 91-173)
provides cash benefits for coal miners who are totally disabled due to
pneumoconiosis (black lung disease), and for widows of coal miners who
were receiving cash benefits under this Act or who died from the disease.
The black lung benefit provisions in title IV, Part B of such Act have
been held to constitute "periodic benefits" under a Federal workmen's
compensation law within the meaning of section 224 (such as to require a
reduction of the worker's disability insurance benefits of the Social
Security Act. Social Security Ruling 70-39, C.B. 1970, p. 90.

Federal workmen's compensation statutes (after which Part B of P.L.
91-173 is modeled in some respects), are administered in such a way that
the initial payments are computed on a weekly, daily, or even an hourly
basis. However, there is nothing in the Federal Coal Mine Health and
Safety Act or in its legislative history to indicate that such a
construction is either necessary or intended for black lung benefit
purposes.

Advice has been requested as to the periodic payment scheme for black
lung payments and the rationale in support of such payment schedule,
whether daily, weekly, or monthly.

Section 413(b) of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 2969
provides, in pertinent part, that:

Section 223 of the Social Security Act provides that qualified claimants
"shall be entitled to a disability insurance benefit for each month
beginning with the first month" in which all requirements are met.
Therefore, section 413(b), supra, may be said at least
inferentially to suggest monthly payments. However, to "utilize the ...
procedures" used in "determining entitlement" under section 223 is one
thing; to incorporate the entitlement factors and payment procedures
contemplated by section 223 is quite another
ach month
beginning with the first month" in which all requirements are met.
Therefore, section 413(b), supra, may be said at least
inferentially to suggest monthly payments. However, to "utilize the ...
procedures" used in "determining entitlement" under section 223 is one
thing; to incorporate the entitlement factors and payment procedures
contemplated by section 223 is quite another. Thus, an accurate
construction of section 413(b) cannot be derived from the simple reading
of its text, nor can the section be said to incorporate other sections of
the Social Security Act merely because they deal with various kinds of
"procedures." The procedures contemplated therein are those for
"determining entitlement" to disability insurance benefits alone and do
not provide a substantial legal foundation for monthly payments.

Nevertheless, the reference in section 413(b) to the "procedures" of
section 223 of the Act is some evidence that the Congress contemplated (at
least with respect to such factors as the right to, and duration of,
benefit payments) a general scheme of administration like that of the
Social Security Act. No provision of P.L. 91-173 specifically directs or
requires payment on other than a monthly basis.

The following legal authority reasonably contemplates payment on a
monthly basis. Section 412(a) of the Act states that:

Similarly, section 412(b) provides that:

In addition, section 422(d), a provision concerning the payment of
benefits under Part C of title IV of the Act (which is to be administered
by the Department of Labor after 1972), provides that:

Since section 412(a) authorizes payment of Part B benefits, section
422(d) raises an additional, and very strong, inference that coal miner's
benefits were intended to be paid monthly.
des that:

In addition, section 422(d), a provision concerning the payment of
benefits under Part C of title IV of the Act (which is to be administered
by the Department of Labor after 1972), provides that:

Since section 412(a) authorizes payment of Part B benefits, section
422(d) raises an additional, and very strong, inference that coal miner's
benefits were intended to be paid monthly.

Finally sections 426(a) and 508 both confer upon the Secretary of Health,
Education, and Welfare broad power to promulgate regulations to implement
the provisions of the Act and in the absence of express statutory
provisions, this authority undoubtedly extends to prescribing payment
periods.

Distinct, but related, issues concern payments in the first and last
months of entitlement, i.e., months in which the factors of entitlement
are met for only part of the month. Important administrative and policy
considerations, in addition to the statutory foundations indicated above,
favor paying a full month's benefit for the first month in which all
factors of entitlement are met and no benefit for the month in which a
pertinent factor of entitlement (e.g., disability of a miner, unremarried
status of a widow) ceases to exist. This is so, especially with respect to
nonpayment for the month in which a requirement for entitlement ceases to
exist.

The concept of entitlement to payment beginning with the entire month of
filing and ending with the month prior to the month in which the
termination event occurs not only is actuarially sound and presents an
equitable treatment of claimants' interest, but administratively is
preferable to pro-rated initial payment, pro-rated months of adjustments
in benefits, and pro-rated termination of payment.
t of entitlement to payment beginning with the entire month of
filing and ending with the month prior to the month in which the
termination event occurs not only is actuarially sound and presents an
equitable treatment of claimants' interest, but administratively is
preferable to pro-rated initial payment, pro-rated months of adjustments
in benefits, and pro-rated termination of payment.

This approach parallels that provided for payments under title II of the
Social Security Act and utilizes the advantage of existing payment
mechanisms and procedural economies which were anticipated by Congress in
assigning the administration of the black lung benefit program to the
Social Security Administration. Inferential support is also evident from
section 413(b) in the reference of that section to the "procedures" of
section 223 of the Social Security Act. For instance, section 223(a)(1)(D)
of the Act provides that entitlement to disability insurance benefits
shall end" . . . with the month preceding the month in which [the
beneficiary] dies. . . ."

A further consideration in the payment of monthly benefits is the
guidance derived from the absence in P.L. 91-173 of any provision with
respect to the disposition of underpayments. If benefits were payable for
all or part of the month in which the miner's or widow's death occurred,
there would, in nearly all cases, be an underpayment for that month. With
the absence of a provision (like that provided in section 204(d) of the
Social Security Act) which would facilitate payment of such underpayments,
the Administration could not receive "good acquittance" for an
underpayment of benefits except by payment to the legal representative of
the deceased beneficiary's estate.
ere would, in nearly all cases, be an underpayment for that month. With
the absence of a provision (like that provided in section 204(d) of the
Social Security Act) which would facilitate payment of such underpayments,
the Administration could not receive "good acquittance" for an
underpayment of benefits except by payment to the legal representative of
the deceased beneficiary's estate.

Accordingly, the absence of any "facility of payment" provision with
respect to underpayments, the absence of any clear direction in the
statute to pay for the month of death, and the analogy drawn by the
statute itself to section 223 of the Social Security Act, could, when
taken together, be considered a statutory direction with respect to the
issue of "nonentitlement" for the month of death. However, the most
abrasive effects of such a policy are reduced by the payment of a full
month's benefit for the first month of entitlement. Additionally, while a
miner would receive no benefit for the month of death (any such benefit
could be payable only to a legal representative), his widow could receive
a full month's benefit for that month in her own right.

In addition to the foregoing considerations, the effective date of an
application for the pertinent benefits must be established. Guidance for
this requirement (section 414(c) of P.L. 91-173) appears somewhat
ambiguous, in stating:

If the antecedent to "a claim therefor" is the word "benefits," i.e., a
claim for benefits, no benefits could be paid prior to the date of filing.
If, however, the antecedent of the words "a claim therefor" is the word
"period," i.e., a claim for a period of entitlement, then, within the
context of a program providing for monthly payments, with an application
requirement but with no provision for retroactivity, a "claim" becomes a
claim for a period of entitlement. Since the word "period" is not
expressly defined by statute, its definition as a calendar month is not
precluded
im therefor" is the word
"period," i.e., a claim for a period of entitlement, then, within the
context of a program providing for monthly payments, with an application
requirement but with no provision for retroactivity, a "claim" becomes a
claim for a period of entitlement. Since the word "period" is not
expressly defined by statute, its definition as a calendar month is not
precluded. Thus, a claim filed by a qualified individual at any time
within a monthly period would entitle that individual to the benefits for
the full period, i.e., the entire calendar month.

As indicated above, the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969
contains many indications that the Congress intended a monthly payment
procedure. The Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare has broad
powers to administer the Act in a manner to make that administration as
efficient as possible. This negates any inference that administratively
onerous limitations should be implied where none are clearly expressed in
the statute. Further, since the Act is remedial in nature, it should be
given a liberal construction in order to effectuate its purpose.

Accordingly, it is held that black lung benefit payments may be
made on a monthly basis upon the filing of a claim for payment by a
qualified individual at any time within a payment period, such claim
entitling the individual to a full month's payment, regardless of the date
within the month on which the claim is filed; but no payment is required
for any month or part thereof in which a terminating event occurs.

## Nearby sections

- [SSR 71-30 SSR 71-30: SECTIONS 413(a), 413(b), AND 422(d), FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969; SECTIONS 223(a), 223(b), and 224(a), SOCIAL SECURITY ACT -- DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS -- BLACK LUNG BENEFITS -- MONTHLY PAYMENT PERIOD](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_DI_SSR_71_30.md)
- [SSR 72-8 SSR 72-8: SECTIONS 413(a), 414(a) and (c). -- FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969 -- CLAIM FOR BLACK LUNG BENEFITS -- FILING AS PREREQUISITE FOR ENTITLEMENT -- PROTECTIVE FILING DATE](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_DI_SSR_72_8.md)
- [SSR 72-41 SSR 72-41: FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969 -- SECTION 412(b), (30 U.S.C. 922(b)) -- DISABILITY BENEFITS PAID UNDER STATE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION LAW AFTER MINER'S DEATH -- PENNSYLVANIA](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_DI_SSR_72_41.md)
- [SSR 72-42 SSR 72-42: FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT -- SECTION 413(c) -- (30 U.S.C. 923(c)). -- FUTILITY OF FILING STATE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION CLAIM WHERE BENEFITS ARE RECEIVED UNDER RAILROAD RETIREMENT ACT OR FEDERAL EMPLOYERS LIABILITY ACT](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_DI_SSR_72_42.md)
- [SSR 72-65 SSR 72-65: FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969, AS AMENDED -- SECTION 412(b) (30 U.S.C. 922(b)). -- BLACK LUNG BENEFITS -- STATE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION PAYMENT ON ACCOUNT OF MINER'S DEATH -- REDUCTION INAPPLICABLE](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_DI_SSR_72_65.md)
- [SSR 72-66 SSR 72-66: FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969, AS AMENDED -- SECTION 412(b) (30 U.S.C. 922(b)) -- REDUCTIONS -- STATE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION DEATH BENEFITS -- KENTUCKY](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_DI_SSR_72_66.md)
- [SSR 73-24 SSR 73-24: FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969, AS AMENDED -- SECTIONS 402(d) AND 411(c) (30 U.S.C. 901) -- CLAIM FOR BLACK LUNG BENEFITS -- SERVICES AS "EMPLOYEE" A PREREQUISITE TO ELIGIBILITY FOR MINER'S BENEFITS](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_DI_SSR_73_24.md)
- [SSR 73-36 SSR 73-36: SECTION 402(f) (30 USC 901) -- FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969 AS AMENDED -- MINER'S DEATH RESULTING FROM COAL MINE ACCIDENT WHILE REGULARLY AND GAINFULLY EMPLOYED -- ESTABLISHMENT OF WIDOW'S ENTITLEMENT TO BLACK LUNG BENEFITS](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_DI_SSR_73_36.md)
- [SSR 73-37 SSR 73-37: Rescinded 1979](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_DI_SSR_73_37.md)
- [SSR 73-38 SSR 73-38: Rescinded 1979](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_DI_SSR_73_38.md)
- [SSR 74-32 SSR 74-32: SECTIONS 414(a) and 415(a) (30 U.S.C. 924(a) and 925(a), et seq.) -- FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969 AS AMENDED -- SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION JURISDICTION FOR PAYMENT OF PART B MINERS' BLACK LUNG BENEFITS -- WHEN REQUIREMENTS FOR ENTITLEMENT MUST BE MET](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_DI_SSR_74_32.md)
- [SSR 74-33 SSR 74-33: SECTION 412(a)(5) (30 U.S.C 901) -- FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969, AS AMENDED -- BLACK LUNG BENEFITS -- CONDITIONS FOR ENTITLEMENT FOR SIBLING](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_DI_SSR_74_33.md)
- [SSR 75-5 SSR 75-5: SECTIONS 411(b) and 413(b) (30 U.S.C. 921(b) and 923(b)) -- FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969, AS AMENDED -- CLAIM FOR BLACK LUNG BENEFITS -- EVALUATION OF CHEST ROENTGENOGRAPHIC (X-RAY) EVIDENCE](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_DI_SSR_75_5.md)
- [SSR 75-10 SSR 75-10: FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969, AS AMENDED -- SECTION 414(d) (30 U.S.C. 924(d)). -- EFFECT OF BLACK LUNG "MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT" PROVISION-REDUCTION OF STATE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION BENEFITS DUE TO RECEIPT OF PERIODIC DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_DI_SSR_75_10.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/SSA_SSR_DI_SSR_71_30. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.
