# OCC Interpretive Letter No. 1106: Letter sets forth the OCC's opinion that Bank is authorized under federal law to conduct fiduciary activities in the states of Georgia and South Carolina notwithstanding state laws that purport to limit the bank's ability to do so by requiring, among other things, that the bank be federally-insured and have a physical presence in the state. Letter also concludes that the bank may deposit the amount of securities required pursuant to federal law and the OCC's regulations rather than a conflicting amount required under Florida law

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT1106

## Section

- **Citation:** OCC Interpretive Letter No. 1106
- **Heading:** Letter sets forth the OCC's opinion that Bank is authorized under federal law to conduct fiduciary activities in the states of Georgia and South Carolina notwithstanding state laws that purport to limit the bank's ability to do so by requiring, among other things, that the bank be federally-insured and have a physical presence in the state. Letter also concludes that the bank may deposit the amount of securities required pursuant to federal law and the OCC's regulations rather than a conflicting amount required under Florida law
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** OCC Interpretive Letters / Letter sets forth the OCC's opinion that Bank is authorized under federal law to conduct fiduciary activities in the states of Georgia and South Carolina notwithstanding state laws that purport to limit the bank's ability to do so by requiring, among other things, that the bank be federally-insured and have a physical presence in the state. Letter also concludes that the bank may deposit the amount of securities required pursuant to federal law and the OCC's regulations rather than a conflicting amount required under Florida law.

## Text

O

Comptroller of the Currency
Administrator of National Banks

Washington, DC 20219

October 10, 2008 Interpretive Letter #1106
December 2008
12 USC 92a
12 CFR 9
Subject:
Fiduciary Powers of [ Bank ]

Dear [ ]:

Thank you for your letter dated August 5, 2008, on behalf of
[ ] (the “Bank”). You have requested confirmation from the Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) principally concerning the Bank’s authority under
federal law to conduct fiduciary activities in the states of Georgia, South Carolina and Florida.
This letter discusses and confirms that authority.

Background

As set forth in your letter, the Bank is a limited-purpose national trust bank, with its main office
in [ State ], and additional trust offices in [ State2 ], [ State3 ], [ State4 ], Florida and
[ State5 ]. The Bank is authorized by the OCC to exercise fiduciary powers. The Bank acts
as a fiduciary for customers in Georgia, South Carolina and Florida as well as a number of other
states. The Bank does not accept deposits and, therefore, is not FDIC-insured. Your letter asks
that the OCC confirm that the Bank: (i) may exercise its federally-authorized fiduciary powers
and act as a fiduciary for customers in Georgia and South Carolina, notwithstanding state laws
that purport to limit the Bank’s ability to do so; and (ii) may deposit the amount of securities
required pursuant to federal law and the OCC’s regulations rather than the larger amount
required under Florida law.

As set out below, the Bank is authorized by 12 U.S.C
lly-authorized fiduciary powers
and act as a fiduciary for customers in Georgia and South Carolina, notwithstanding state laws
that purport to limit the Bank’s ability to do so; and (ii) may deposit the amount of securities
required pursuant to federal law and the OCC’s regulations rather than the larger amount
required under Florida law.

As set out below, the Bank is authorized by 12 U.S.C. § 92a and Part 9 of the OCC’s regulations
to act as a fiduciary for customers in the states of Georgia and South Carolina, notwithstanding
state laws that purport to limit its ability to do so. In connection with the Bank’s fiduciary
activities in Florida, we also confirm that under Section 92a and Part 9, the Bank may deposit the
amount of securities required pursuant to federal law and the OCC’s regulations rather than the
conflicting amount required under Florida law.

- -
2
Analysis

The Bank's fiduciary powers are governed by federal law and derive from 12 U.S.C. § 92a and
Part 9 of the OCC’s regulations. Section 92a permits national banks to exercise fiduciary powers
with OCC approval,1 and directs that the types of fiduciary powers available to a national bank
are to be determined by reference to state law. Section 92a(a) provides:

The Comptroller of the Currency shall be authorized and empowered to
grant by special permit to national banks applying therefor, when not in
contravention of State or local law, the right to act as trustee, executor,
administrator, registrar of stocks and bonds, guardian of estates, assignee,
receiver, committee of estates of lunatics, or in any other fiduciary
capacity in which State banks, trust companies, or other corporations
which come into competition with national banks are permitted to act
under the laws of the State in which the national bank is located
law, the right to act as trustee, executor,
administrator, registrar of stocks and bonds, guardian of estates, assignee,
receiver, committee of estates of lunatics, or in any other fiduciary
capacity in which State banks, trust companies, or other corporations
which come into competition with national banks are permitted to act
under the laws of the State in which the national bank is located.
Section 92a(b) provides that whenever state law permits state fiduciaries to exercise any of the
eight fiduciary powers set forth in Section 92a(a), a national bank's exercise of those powers is
deemed not to be "in contravention of State or local law."
The grant of statutory authority in Section 92a does not limit where a national bank with
fiduciary powers may act in a fiduciary capacity. Accordingly, our regulations at 12 C.F.R. § 9.7
expressly provide that a national bank may act in a fiduciary capacity in any state, and may
establish trust offices or trust representative offices in any state.2 In addition, Section 92a
imposes no limitations on where the bank may market its services, where the bank's fiduciary
customers may be located, or where property being administered is located. Once the state in
which a national bank is acting in a fiduciary capacity is identified,3 the fiduciary services may
be offered regardless of where the fiduciary customers reside or where property that is being
administered is located. Our regulation codifies this authority, stating that while acting in a
fiduciary capacity in one state, a national bank may market its fiduciary services to customers in

1 See 12 C.F.R. § 5.26 (licensing requirements for fiduciary powers).
2 12 C.F.R. § 9.7(a) and (c). For a discussion of the analysis on which § 9.7 is based, see 66 Fed. Reg. 34792,
34794-96 (July 2, 2001) (preamble to final rule adopting § 9.7). See also OCC Interpretive Letter No
ional bank may market its fiduciary services to customers in

1 See 12 C.F.R. § 5.26 (licensing requirements for fiduciary powers).
2 12 C.F.R. § 9.7(a) and (c). For a discussion of the analysis on which § 9.7 is based, see 66 Fed. Reg. 34792,
34794-96 (July 2, 2001) (preamble to final rule adopting § 9.7). See also OCC Interpretive Letter No. 695
(December 8, 1995) (analyzing national banks’ authority to engage in fiduciary activities in multiple states); OCC
Interpretive Letter No. 872 (October 28, 1999) (concluding that a national bank in Ohio may solicit and conduct a
trust business in California and that state laws that purport to prohibit the bank from engaging in these activities are
preempted).
3 Part 9 of the OCC’s regulations clarifies that the state in which a bank acts in a fiduciary capacity for any given
fiduciary relationship is the state in which the bank performs the key fiduciary activities of accepting fiduciary
appointments, executing documents that create the fiduciary relationship, and making decisions regarding the
investment or distribution of fiduciary assets. If these key fiduciary activities take place in more than one state for
any given relationship, a bank must designate the state in which it acts in a fiduciary capacity from among those
states. 12 C.F.R. § 9.7(d).

- -
3

other states.4 In addition, a national bank may act as fiduciary for relationships that include
property located in other states.5
Our regulations further provide that with the exception of those state laws specifically
referenced in Section 92a, any state laws limiting or establishing preconditions on the exercise
of fiduciary powers by a national bank are not applicable to national banks.6
Georgia and South Carolina

You have indicated that the Bank provides fiduciary services for customers and property located
in Georgia and South Carolina
provide that with the exception of those state laws specifically
referenced in Section 92a, any state laws limiting or establishing preconditions on the exercise
of fiduciary powers by a national bank are not applicable to national banks.6
Georgia and South Carolina

You have indicated that the Bank provides fiduciary services for customers and property located
in Georgia and South Carolina. You represent that the Bank does not have an office in either
state and does not “act in a fiduciary capacity,” as that term is defined in 12 C.F.R. § 9.7(d), in
these states.7

Georgia law generally permits “foreign corporations” to act as a fiduciary in the state,8 however,
the definition of “foreign corporation” is limited to federally-insured state-chartered banks or
their subsidiaries, corporations organized under the laws of states that border Georgia, and “[a]ny
federally chartered financial institution whose deposits are federally insured having its principal
place of business in any state of the United States, other than Georgia, or any subsidiary of such
financial institution.”9 Although the Bank is federally-chartered, because it does not take
federally-insured deposits, it would be prohibited under Georgia law from acting as a fiduciary
for customers and property in the state. Your letter further describes a Georgia reciprocity
statute that provides that a foreign corporation may only conduct fiduciary activities in the state
if Georgia-chartered fiduciaries and national banks with their principal places of business in
Georgia may do so in the state in which the foreign corporation is organized or, in the case of a
national bank, the state in which it has its principal place of business.10

Your letter also describes two South Carolina statutes. The first provides that a corporation
“created under the laws of the United States and not having a business in [the] State .
heir principal places of business in
Georgia may do so in the state in which the foreign corporation is organized or, in the case of a
national bank, the state in which it has its principal place of business.10

Your letter also describes two South Carolina statutes. The first provides that a corporation
“created under the laws of the United States and not having a business in [the] State . . .” is not
qualified to be a personal representative for the estate of a person domiciled in the state.11 The
second requires national banks that do not have their principal place of business in South
Carolina to obtain written approval from the State Board of Bank Control prior to engaging in a
trust business in the state.12

As noted above, Section 92a and Part 9 of the OCC’s regulations make it clear that a national
bank with fiduciary powers may act in a fiduciary capacity in any state and may market fiduciary

4 12 C.F.R. § 9.7(b).
5 Id.
6 12 C.F.R. § 9.7(e)(2). See also Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N.A., 127 S.Ct. 1559 (2007) (holding that, under the
National Bank Act, a national bank may conduct federally-authorized mortgage lending activities through an
operating subsidiary without regard to state licensing regimes).
7 Your letter states that the Bank acts in a fiduciary capacity in those states in which it has offices.
8 O.C.G.A. § 53-12-391.
9 O.C.G.A. § 53-12-390.
10 O.C.G.A. § 53-12-391(a)(2).
11 S.C. Code Ann. § 62-3-203(e)(3).
12 S.C. Code Ann. § 34-21-10.
may conduct federally-authorized mortgage lending activities through an
operating subsidiary without regard to state licensing regimes).
7 Your letter states that the Bank acts in a fiduciary capacity in those states in which it has offices.
8 O.C.G.A. § 53-12-391.
9 O.C.G.A. § 53-12-390.
10 O.C.G.A. § 53-12-391(a)(2).
11 S.C. Code Ann. § 62-3-203(e)(3).
12 S.C. Code Ann. § 34-21-10.

- -
4

services to, and perform such services for, customers in other states. Section 9.7(e)(2) of our
regulations further provides that, with the exception of those state laws specifically referenced in
Section 92a, any state laws limiting or establishing preconditions on the exercise of fiduciary
powers by a national bank are not applicable to national banks. Because the state statutes you
have cited would have the effect of limiting or preconditioning national banks’ exercise of their
federally-authorized fiduciary powers, these statutes are not applicable to national banks.13
Therefore, we confirm that the Bank may exercise its federally-authorized fiduciary powers and
act as a fiduciary for customers and property located in Georgia and South Carolina,
notwithstanding the states’ laws conditioning the exercise of those powers.14

Florida

According to your letter, the Bank has a trust office in the state of Florida and acts in a fiduciary
capacity in that state
Therefore, we confirm that the Bank may exercise its federally-authorized fiduciary powers and
act as a fiduciary for customers and property located in Georgia and South Carolina,
notwithstanding the states’ laws conditioning the exercise of those powers.14

Florida

According to your letter, the Bank has a trust office in the state of Florida and acts in a fiduciary
capacity in that state. Your letter also notes that the Bank has been advised by the Florida
Department of Financial Services that it must comply with the state law that requires all national
banks to deposit or pledge securities with a market value of 25% of the bank’s issued and
outstanding capital stock.15

Section 92a(f) provides that “[w]henever the laws of a State require corporations acting in a
fiduciary capacity to deposit securities with the State authorities for the protection of private or
court trusts, national banks so acting shall be required to make similar deposits and securities so
deposited shall be held for the protection of private or court trusts, as provided by the State law.”
The OCC’s regulations govern the application of this statutory provision in the context of
national banks that act in a fiduciary capacity in more than one state. In that circumstance, “the
bank may compute the amount of securities that are required to be deposited for each state on the
basis of the amount of assets for which the bank is acting in a fiduciary capacity at offices
located in that state
s regulations govern the application of this statutory provision in the context of
national banks that act in a fiduciary capacity in more than one state. In that circumstance, “the
bank may compute the amount of securities that are required to be deposited for each state on the
basis of the amount of assets for which the bank is acting in a fiduciary capacity at offices
located in that state. If state law requires a deposit of securities on a basis other than assets (e.g.,
a requirement to deposit a fixed amount or an amount equal to a percentage of capital), the bank
may compute the amount of deposit required in that state on a pro-rated basis, according to the
proportion of fiduciary assets for which the bank is acting in a fiduciary capacity at offices
located in that state.”16

Your letter explains that the amount of securities to be deposited required under Florida law is
higher than the amount calculated under the OCC’s regulations. We confirm that the Bank need

13 We note specifically that there is no requirement under federal law or OCC regulations that a national bank
accept deposits or have federal deposit insurance in order to be authorized to engage in fiduciary activities.
14 Although your letter states that Georgia state officials have indicated that these statutes would be applicable to the
Bank, a provision in the same Georgia law also provides that “[n]othing in this part shall be construed to prohibit or
make unlawful any activity in this state . . . by a national bank which does not have its principal place of business in
this state, which activity would be lawful in the absence of this part.” O.C.G.A. § 53-12-391(c). This provision
could be read to mean that the restrictions discussed in the text would not apply to the Bank even under Georgia
state law.
15 Fla. Stat. § 660.27(1). The statute further provides that the amount shall not exceed $500,000.
16 12 C.F.R. § 9.14(b).
rincipal place of business in
this state, which activity would be lawful in the absence of this part.” O.C.G.A. § 53-12-391(c). This provision
could be read to mean that the restrictions discussed in the text would not apply to the Bank even under Georgia
state law.
15 Fla. Stat. § 660.27(1). The statute further provides that the amount shall not exceed $500,000.
16 12 C.F.R. § 9.14(b).

- -
5

not deposit securities in the amount required under the Florida law, but instead may deposit
securities in the amount calculated under the OCC’s regulations at 12 C.F.R. § 9.14(b).17

Other Statutes

In addition to the matters discussed above, your letter also contained specific requests regarding
a number of statutes in other states. The types of statutes in your letter generally contained
reciprocity requirements, physical presence requirements, and requirements to obtain certificates
of authority from the state, all of which must be satisfied prior to conducting trust activities or
establishing a trust office. As noted earlier, our regulations clearly provide that with the
exception of those laws specifically referenced in Section 92a, any state laws limiting or
establishing preconditions on the exercise of fiduciary powers by a national bank are not
applicable to national banks.18 The types of statutes you referenced have been largely addressed
in the OCC regulations and in our prior opinions.19

I trust that the foregoing is responsive to your request. Please feel free to contact Andra Shuster,
Special Counsel, at (202) 874-4694 should you have further questions.

Sincerely,

Signed

Julie L. Williams
First Senior Deputy Comptroller and Chief Counsel

17 Your letter also requests that we confirm that the Bank need not comply with state securities deposit laws with
respect to states in which the Bank does not act in a fiduciary capacity. It is clear from 12 C.F.R
uster,
Special Counsel, at (202) 874-4694 should you have further questions.

Sincerely,

Signed

Julie L. Williams
First Senior Deputy Comptroller and Chief Counsel

17 Your letter also requests that we confirm that the Bank need not comply with state securities deposit laws with
respect to states in which the Bank does not act in a fiduciary capacity. It is clear from 12 C.F.R. § 9.14(b) and
Section 92a(f) that a national bank need only make a deposit of securities in states where it “acts in a fiduciary
capacity,” as that term is defined in 12 C.F.R. § 9.7(d).
18 12 C.F.R. § 9.7(e).
19 See, e.g., OCC Interpretive Letter 866 (October 8, 1999)(state statutes requiring reciprocity, a physical presence,
certificates of authority, deposits of securities); OCC Interpretive Letter No. 872 (October 28, 1999)(state statues
requiring certificates of authority, a physical presence); OCC Interpretive Letter 995 (June 22, 2004)(state statutes
requiring a physical presence); and OCC Interpretive Letter 1080 (April 4, 2007)(state statute requiring reciprocity
certificate).

Moreover, the issues under Georgia, South Carolina and Florida law discussed earlier in this letter also are
essentially identical to issues already resolved by the OCC’s Part 9 regulations and prior opinion letters cited herein.
Accordingly, the publication requirements of 12 U.S.C. §§ 43(a) and (b) are not applicable. See 12 U.S.C.
§ 43(c)(1)(A).

## Nearby sections

- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 719 Letter concludes that an ESOP is a "company' for purposes of 12 U.S.C. 371c and that an ESOP that controls at least 25% of a bank's voting stock is an "affiliate" under sec. 371c (supersedes existing OCC interpretive letter #261). (10/26/89)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0719.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 720 Group of affiliate national banks may collectively own, through operating subsidiaries, minority interest in a merchant credit card processing subsidiary. (01/26/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0720.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 722 A national bank may invest CIF assets in mutual funds, including mutual funds that pay the bank a servicing fee, without the bank having to reduce its trustee fees, if the bank concludes, based upon a reasoned opinion of trust counsel, that such an arrangement is authorized by applicable state law, is consistent with the trust instrument, is appropriate for the particular trust accounts, and is consistent with OCC regulations, including in particular 12 C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12). (03/12/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0722.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 724 Bank can sell vehicle service contracts to customers who use home equity loan proceeds to purchase a vehicle, and the maturity of the service contract may be different from the maturity of the loan. (04/22/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0724.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 725 National bank to establish an operating subsidiary to engage in permissible derivatives-related activities. (05/10/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0725.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 726 Letter concerns the application of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations to financial institutions' support of microenterprise lending programs. (06/21/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0726.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 730 Letter concludes that loans proposed by the bank to an unaffiliated distributor of mutual funds would not be subject to interaffiliate lending restrictions contained in 12 U.S.C. 371C. (05/29/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0730.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 732 National bank may make a 5.5% investment in software company which is engaged in the design, development, marketing and maintenance of a network for electronic funds transfers and electronic data interchange, including transacting electronic commerce and marketing software products for use on its world-wide electronic commerce network. (05/10/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0732.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 733 National bank receiver is subject to the rights of secured creditors and creditors entitled to setoff. U.S. legal principles regarding enforcement of security interests are applicable to a receivership of a federal branch or agency conducted under National Bank Act. Therefore, receiver of an uninsured federal branch or agency does not have the right to interfere with the rights of secured creditors, including application of collateral held in U.S. to obligations of a non-U.S. office of the bank. (06/19/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0733.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 736 Lending limit exception for participations not limited to banks. Non-banks may act as participants. (07/25/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0736.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 737 Huntington National Bank's acquisition of minority interest in a limited liability company providing stored value systems. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0737.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 738 National bank's participation in a guaranty issued by an agent for a syndication of lenders with respect to their borrower's letter of credit reimbursement obligations to another bank or financial institution is permissible under I.R. 7.1016. (08/14/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0738.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 740 Letter advises the Bank as follows: 1) The question of whether "salary" as used in 12 C.F.R. 2.4 includes an officer's base salary, bonuses, director's fees and/or any other compensation paid by the Bank must be determined by the Bank's management; 2) the question of whether the payment bonuses for credit life sales under 12 C.F.R. 2.4 is based on salary received by the recipient in a calendar year, a fiscal year, or any 12-month period must be determined by the Bank's management; and 3) pursuant to 12 C.F.R. 2.4, if the Bank's CEO is a loan officer and the CEO participates in the bonus plan under which payments based on credit life insurance sales are made, the CEO must be included in averaging the salaries of loan officers that participate in the Bank's bonus or incentive plan. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0740.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 741 National bank may acquire majority interest in company which operates call center facility which operates programs by which potential customers for new or used automobiles may access databases containing information on the used and new car inventories of numerous automobile dealerships in its metropolitan area. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0741.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT1106. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.