# OCC Interpretive Letter No. 1036: Letter states that a remote check scanning terminal at a customer's location, which permits the customer to deposit checks electronically, is not a branch > Federal · Agency guidance · In force URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT1036 ## Section - **Citation:** OCC Interpretive Letter No. 1036 - **Heading:** Letter states that a remote check scanning terminal at a customer's location, which permits the customer to deposit checks electronically, is not a branch - **Jurisdiction:** Federal - **Kind:** Agency guidance - **Status:** In force - **Text as of:** August 14, 2026 - **Source:** Compiled text - **Location:** OCC Interpretive Letters / Letter states that a remote check scanning terminal at a customer's location, which permits the customer to deposit checks electronically, is not a branch. ## Text O Comptroller of the Currency Administrator of National Banks Washington, DC 20219 August 10, 2005 Interpretive Letter #1036 August 2005 12 USC 36 Subject: Remote Deposit Capture Terminals Dear [ ]: This is in response to your letter of June 2, 2005 on behalf of [ National Bank ], requesting confirmation of our earlier telephone discussion as to whether a check scanning terminal at a nonbank location, used by a bank customer to transmit electronic images of checks to the bank for deposit, is a branch within the meaning of the McFadden Act, 12 U.S.C. § 36. This will confirm my opinion expressed during that call that such terminals are not branches under federal law regardless of whether they are owned by the customer or the bank. Facts According to your letter, it is now possible for a corporate customer of a bank to use a check scanning terminal, located on the customer’s premises, to make deposits. The customer scans a check and an electronic image of the check is then transmitted to the bank to effect a deposit. This can be done even when the depositary bank is located in another state and does not have a branch in the customer’s state. In some cases the scanning terminal may be owned by the bank, while in other cases the customer or a third party may own the terminal. This process, known as “remote deposit capture,”1 has been made possible by the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (“Check 21 Act”),2 which was enacted in 2003 and took effect on October 28, 2004. Briefly, the Check 21 Act authorizes the use of a “substitute check,” which is a paper reproduction of an original check that contains an image of the front and back of the original check. When a bank customer deposits a check, the depositary bank may choose to send a substitute check to the collecting bank instead of sending it the actual check in 2003 and took effect on October 28, 2004. Briefly, the Check 21 Act authorizes the use of a “substitute check,” which is a paper reproduction of an original check that contains an image of the front and back of the original check. When a bank customer deposits a check, the depositary bank may choose to send a substitute check to the collecting bank instead of sending it the actual check. Alternatively, if agreeable to both banks, the depositary and collecting banks can engage in 1 See, e.g., Bonnie McGeer, Remote Deposit Boosts Service, Cuts Costs, American Banker, Jan. 18, 2005. 2 Pub. L. No. 108-100, 117 Stat. 1177 (2003), codified at 12 U.S.C. §§ 5001-5018. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has issued implementing regulations that are primarily codified as Subpart D of Regulation CC, 12 C.F.R. §§ 229.51 et seq. - - 2 electronic check presentment where data and images captured from the original check are provided in lieu of the original check. The collecting bank then may use or generate a substitute check for presentment to the paying bank or, by agreement, these banks can engage in electronic check presentment. The original check is retained at the depositary bank, i.e., it is truncated. Provided that certain requirements are met, a substitute check is the legal equivalent of the original check. Thus, the Check 21 Act is intended to facilitate the check collection process by eliminating the need to transport original checks around the country. The original depositor may also truncate the check if the depositary bank has agreed to permit it.3 As discussed above, instead of taking the original check to the bank for deposit, the bank’s customer can scan the check on a terminal at the customer’s location and simply transmit electronic images and data from the check to the bank in order to effect the deposit. Analysis Under the McFadden Act, 12 U.S.C tor may also truncate the check if the depositary bank has agreed to permit it.3 As discussed above, instead of taking the original check to the bank for deposit, the bank’s customer can scan the check on a terminal at the customer’s location and simply transmit electronic images and data from the check to the bank in order to effect the deposit. Analysis Under the McFadden Act, 12 U.S.C. § 36, a “branch” is a location established (i.e., owned or rented) by a national bank at which deposits are received, or checks paid, or money lent.4 However, it does not include an automated teller machine or a remote service unit.5 The OCC has issued a regulation defining a “remote service unit:” A remote service unit (RSU) is an automated facility, operated by a customer of a bank, that conducts banking functions, such as receiving deposits, paying withdrawals, or lending money. A national bank may establish and operate an RSU pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 24(Seventh). An RSU includes an automated teller machine, automated loan machine, and automated device for receiving deposits. An RSU may be equipped with a telephone or televideo device that allows contact with bank personnel. An RSU is not a “branch” within the meaning of 12 U.S.C. 36(j), and is not subject to state geographic or operational restrictions or licensing laws.6 We conclude that a remote deposit capture terminal is not a “branch” for purposes of section 36. If, on one hand, the terminal performs the banking function of “receiving 3 Customers have no right to provide electronic images for deposit without the consent of the depositary bank. Banks that permit customers to submit deposits based on self-generated, truncated check images and data will need to consider adopting risk control measures such as appropriate technical standards, exposure limits, and indemnification from the customer 3 Customers have no right to provide electronic images for deposit without the consent of the depositary bank. Banks that permit customers to submit deposits based on self-generated, truncated check images and data will need to consider adopting risk control measures such as appropriate technical standards, exposure limits, and indemnification from the customer. Some banks are also using image inspection tools to review the images received from customers for quality. The bank that accepts the images and data from the truncating customer may be liable for warranty and indemnification claims that result under the Check 21 Act if the substitute checks based on those images and data prove inadequate. 4 The leading case explaining these terms is Independent Bankers Ass’n of America v. Smith, 534 F.2d 921 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 862 (1976). 5 12 U.S.C. § 36(j). 6 12 C.F.R. § 7.4003. - - 3 deposits,” then it falls within the definition of a “remote service unit.” It is “automated” in the sense that it is operated by the customer rather than a bank employee and can be used by the customer to effect a banking transaction without the involvement of bank personnel. On the other hand, if the terminal does not “receive deposits,” then it is not a “branch” because it does not engage in a core banking function. Therefore, we conclude that a remote deposit capture terminal as described in your letter is a not branch within the meaning of the McFadden Act, even if such a terminal is established (owned or rented) by a national bank. If the terminal instead is owned or rented by the customer, then it still is not a branch because it is not established by a bank, whether it is considered to “receive deposits” or not. Since the terminal is not a branch, the customer’s location where the terminal is deployed also is not a branch f the McFadden Act, even if such a terminal is established (owned or rented) by a national bank. If the terminal instead is owned or rented by the customer, then it still is not a branch because it is not established by a bank, whether it is considered to “receive deposits” or not. Since the terminal is not a branch, the customer’s location where the terminal is deployed also is not a branch. Therefore, it does not matter for branching purposes where the electronic deposit is considered to be “made” or “received,” and so we express no opinion on those questions. I trust that this has been responsive to your inquiry. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 874-5300. Sincerely, signed Christopher C. Manthey Special Counsel Bank Activities & Structure Division ## Nearby sections - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 719 Letter concludes that an ESOP is a "company' for purposes of 12 U.S.C. 371c and that an ESOP that controls at least 25% of a bank's voting stock is an "affiliate" under sec. 371c (supersedes existing OCC interpretive letter #261). (10/26/89)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0719.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 720 Group of affiliate national banks may collectively own, through operating subsidiaries, minority interest in a merchant credit card processing subsidiary. (01/26/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0720.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 722 A national bank may invest CIF assets in mutual funds, including mutual funds that pay the bank a servicing fee, without the bank having to reduce its trustee fees, if the bank concludes, based upon a reasoned opinion of trust counsel, that such an arrangement is authorized by applicable state law, is consistent with the trust instrument, is appropriate for the particular trust accounts, and is consistent with OCC regulations, including in particular 12 C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12). (03/12/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0722.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 724 Bank can sell vehicle service contracts to customers who use home equity loan proceeds to purchase a vehicle, and the maturity of the service contract may be different from the maturity of the loan. (04/22/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0724.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 725 National bank to establish an operating subsidiary to engage in permissible derivatives-related activities. (05/10/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0725.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 726 Letter concerns the application of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations to financial institutions' support of microenterprise lending programs. (06/21/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0726.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 730 Letter concludes that loans proposed by the bank to an unaffiliated distributor of mutual funds would not be subject to interaffiliate lending restrictions contained in 12 U.S.C. 371C. (05/29/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0730.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 732 National bank may make a 5.5% investment in software company which is engaged in the design, development, marketing and maintenance of a network for electronic funds transfers and electronic data interchange, including transacting electronic commerce and marketing software products for use on its world-wide electronic commerce network. (05/10/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0732.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 733 National bank receiver is subject to the rights of secured creditors and creditors entitled to setoff. U.S. legal principles regarding enforcement of security interests are applicable to a receivership of a federal branch or agency conducted under National Bank Act. Therefore, receiver of an uninsured federal branch or agency does not have the right to interfere with the rights of secured creditors, including application of collateral held in U.S. to obligations of a non-U.S. office of the bank. (06/19/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0733.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 736 Lending limit exception for participations not limited to banks. Non-banks may act as participants. (07/25/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0736.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 737 Huntington National Bank's acquisition of minority interest in a limited liability company providing stored value systems. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0737.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 738 National bank's participation in a guaranty issued by an agent for a syndication of lenders with respect to their borrower's letter of credit reimbursement obligations to another bank or financial institution is permissible under I.R. 7.1016. (08/14/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0738.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 740 Letter advises the Bank as follows: 1) The question of whether "salary" as used in 12 C.F.R. 2.4 includes an officer's base salary, bonuses, director's fees and/or any other compensation paid by the Bank must be determined by the Bank's management; 2) the question of whether the payment bonuses for credit life sales under 12 C.F.R. 2.4 is based on salary received by the recipient in a calendar year, a fiscal year, or any 12-month period must be determined by the Bank's management; and 3) pursuant to 12 C.F.R. 2.4, if the Bank's CEO is a loan officer and the CEO participates in the bonus plan under which payments based on credit life insurance sales are made, the CEO must be included in averaging the salaries of loan officers that participate in the Bank's bonus or incentive plan. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0740.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 741 National bank may acquire majority interest in company which operates call center facility which operates programs by which potential customers for new or used automobiles may access databases containing information on the used and new car inventories of numerous automobile dealerships in its metropolitan area. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0741.md) --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT1036. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.