# OCC Interpretive Letter No. 950: Letter addresses the interaction of the legal lending limit and 371D. Bank proposes to make a loan to an unrelated entity that will construct a new bank building. The amount of the loan would exceed the bank's 15 % general lending limit. However, under 371D, a national bank may invest in bank premises and make loans to any corporation holding the premises of the bank in an amount not to exceed 100% of the bank's capital stock (absent certain other requirements being satisfied). The letter concludes that the more specific statute, 371D, controls over the more general LLL statute

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0950

## Section

- **Citation:** OCC Interpretive Letter No. 950
- **Heading:** Letter addresses the interaction of the legal lending limit and 371D. Bank proposes to make a loan to an unrelated entity that will construct a new bank building. The amount of the loan would exceed the bank's 15 % general lending limit. However, under 371D, a national bank may invest in bank premises and make loans to any corporation holding the premises of the bank in an amount not to exceed 100% of the bank's capital stock (absent certain other requirements being satisfied). The letter concludes that the more specific statute, 371D, controls over the more general LLL statute
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** OCC Interpretive Letters / Letter addresses the interaction of the legal lending limit and 371D. Bank proposes to make a loan to an unrelated entity that will construct a new bank building. The amount of the loan would exceed the bank's 15 % general lending limit. However, under 371D, a national bank may invest in bank premises and make loans to any corporation holding the premises of the bank in an amount not to exceed 100% of the bank's capital stock (absent certain other requirements being satisfied). The letter concludes that the more specific statute, 371D, controls over the more general LLL statute.

## Text

O

Comptroller of the Currency
Administrator of National Banks

Washington, DC 20219

December 18, 2002 Interpretive Letter #950
12USC 29B
12 USC 84(a)(1)
12 USC 371D

Re:
Loans made by a national bank to an entity used as part of the bank’s like-kind
exchange of bank premises

Dear [ ]:

This letter is in response to your October 18, 2002, letter addressed to Julie L. Williams,
First Senior Deputy Comptroller and Chief Counsel. In your letter, you ask how the OCC would
apply the legal lending limit statute, 12 U.S.C. § 84, to a national bank (“Bank”) using the tax-
deferred exchange provisions under section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to effect
a like-kind exchange of bank premises.

Briefly, the Bank enters into a contract to purchase a piece of new property upon which
will be constructed its new office building, assigns the contract to an unrelated entity (“Newco”),
and extends credit to Newco to purchase the new property. Newco will be responsible for
constructing the new office building. At the same time, the Bank enters into a lease with Newco,
with the lease payments being large enough to cover debt service on the loan to Newco plus
Newco’s fee for participating in the transaction. Ultimately, the Bank’s existing main office is
sold, the sales contract is assigned to an affiliate of Newco, and the affiliate sells the old office
building. The affiliate then uses the proceeds to buy the new building from Newco and transfers
the new building to the Bank. At that time, any amount due on the loan to Newco is repaid.

It is my opinion that the Bank’s loan to Newco would be an extension credit for purposes
of 12 U.S.C. § 84
the sales contract is assigned to an affiliate of Newco, and the affiliate sells the old office
building. The affiliate then uses the proceeds to buy the new building from Newco and transfers
the new building to the Bank. At that time, any amount due on the loan to Newco is repaid.

It is my opinion that the Bank’s loan to Newco would be an extension credit for purposes
of 12 U.S.C. § 84. Section 84(b)(1) defines “loans and extensions of credit” to “include all direct
or indirect advances of funds to a person made on the basis of any obligation of that person to
repay the funds or repayable from specific property pledged by or on behalf of the person …”.
Based upon your fact pattern, the loan by the Bank to Newco meets this definition. Therefore,
under section 84(a)(1), the total outstanding loans made by the Bank to Newco would be limited
to 15 percent of the Bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus.

- 2 -

However, because Newco would hold bank premises,1 the Bank may take advantage of
12 U.S.C. § 371d. Section 371d provides in part that:

No national bank or State member bank shall invest in bank premises, or in the
stock, bonds, debentures, or other such obligations of any corporation holding the
premises of such bank, or make loans to or upon the security of any such
corporation– … (2) unless the aggregate of all such investments and loans,
together with the amount of any indebtedness incurred by any such corporation
that is an affiliate of the bank, is less than or equal to the amount of the capital
stock of such bank; …

Under this section, a national bank must aggregate its direct investments in bank premises and
corporations that hold bank premises, its loans to such corporations, and any indebtedness
incurred by such corporations which are affiliates of the national bank.2 This total may not
exceed an amount equal to the bank’s capital stock (unless certain other requirements are
satisfied)
such bank; …

Under this section, a national bank must aggregate its direct investments in bank premises and
corporations that hold bank premises, its loans to such corporations, and any indebtedness
incurred by such corporations which are affiliates of the national bank.2 This total may not
exceed an amount equal to the bank’s capital stock (unless certain other requirements are
satisfied).

If a national bank has no other “investments” in bank premises, then section 371d would
authorize the national bank to lend money to an unaffiliated corporation holding bank premises
in an amount equal to the bank’s capital stock.3 Therefore, if section 371d’s aggregate limits are
otherwise satisfied, it is my opinion that the Bank could loan Newco an amount which would
exceed the limitations contained in 12 U.S.C. § 84. Rules of statutory interpretation strongly
presume that “[w]here there is no clear intention otherwise, a specific statute will not be
controlled or nullified by a general one.”4 For example, with respect to extensions of credit
made by national banks to their affiliates, the OCC has determined that the more specific affiliate
transaction statute, 12 U.S.C. § 371c, takes precedence over the general lending limits in section
84.5

1 Under 12 U.S.C. § 29(First), a national bank may invest in real estate that is necessary for the
transaction of its business. Twelve C.F.R. § 7.1000(a)(2)(i) provides that this real estate includes
“[p]remises that are owned and occupied (or to be occupied, if under construction) by the bank …”
(emphasis added). Section 7.1000(a)(3) further provides that national banks may acquire and hold such
real estate by means of a leasehold estate. Therefore, the new property that the Bank is leasing and upon
which the Bank’s new building is being constructed by Newco is bank premises.
2 Section 371d does not require that corporations holding bank premises be affiliates of the
national bank
(emphasis added). Section 7.1000(a)(3) further provides that national banks may acquire and hold such
real estate by means of a leasehold estate. Therefore, the new property that the Bank is leasing and upon
which the Bank’s new building is being constructed by Newco is bank premises.
2 Section 371d does not require that corporations holding bank premises be affiliates of the
national bank. See Letter from James J. Saxon, Comptroller of the Currency (Mar. 26, 1964)
(unpublished). Rather, this section requires only that the national bank include in its aggregate
investment in bank premises any indebtedness incurred by corporations that are affiliates of the bank.
3 In this case, the Bank would have two such “investments” – the investment in its current office
building and the loan to Newco – that must be aggregated.
4 AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Bd., 525 U.S. 366, 410 (1999), (quoting Crawford Fitting Co. v.
J.T. Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437, 445 (1987)). Accord Morton v. Marconi, 417 U.S. 535, 550-51 (1974).
5 See 12 C.F.R. § 32.1(c); Letter from Rosemarie Oda, Senior Attorney, Legal Advisory Services
Division (Jan. 25, 1985) (unpublished).

- 3 -

While the section 84 lending limits would not apply, any extension of credit by the Bank
to Newco must conform with safe and sound banking practices. If you have any questions,
please contact me at (202) 874-5300.

Sincerely,

/s/ Steven V. Key

Steven V. Key
Senior Attorney

## Nearby sections

- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 719 Letter concludes that an ESOP is a "company' for purposes of 12 U.S.C. 371c and that an ESOP that controls at least 25% of a bank's voting stock is an "affiliate" under sec. 371c (supersedes existing OCC interpretive letter #261). (10/26/89)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0719.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 720 Group of affiliate national banks may collectively own, through operating subsidiaries, minority interest in a merchant credit card processing subsidiary. (01/26/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0720.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 722 A national bank may invest CIF assets in mutual funds, including mutual funds that pay the bank a servicing fee, without the bank having to reduce its trustee fees, if the bank concludes, based upon a reasoned opinion of trust counsel, that such an arrangement is authorized by applicable state law, is consistent with the trust instrument, is appropriate for the particular trust accounts, and is consistent with OCC regulations, including in particular 12 C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12). (03/12/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0722.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 724 Bank can sell vehicle service contracts to customers who use home equity loan proceeds to purchase a vehicle, and the maturity of the service contract may be different from the maturity of the loan. (04/22/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0724.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 725 National bank to establish an operating subsidiary to engage in permissible derivatives-related activities. (05/10/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0725.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 726 Letter concerns the application of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations to financial institutions' support of microenterprise lending programs. (06/21/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0726.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 730 Letter concludes that loans proposed by the bank to an unaffiliated distributor of mutual funds would not be subject to interaffiliate lending restrictions contained in 12 U.S.C. 371C. (05/29/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0730.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 732 National bank may make a 5.5% investment in software company which is engaged in the design, development, marketing and maintenance of a network for electronic funds transfers and electronic data interchange, including transacting electronic commerce and marketing software products for use on its world-wide electronic commerce network. (05/10/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0732.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 733 National bank receiver is subject to the rights of secured creditors and creditors entitled to setoff. U.S. legal principles regarding enforcement of security interests are applicable to a receivership of a federal branch or agency conducted under National Bank Act. Therefore, receiver of an uninsured federal branch or agency does not have the right to interfere with the rights of secured creditors, including application of collateral held in U.S. to obligations of a non-U.S. office of the bank. (06/19/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0733.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 736 Lending limit exception for participations not limited to banks. Non-banks may act as participants. (07/25/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0736.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 737 Huntington National Bank's acquisition of minority interest in a limited liability company providing stored value systems. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0737.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 738 National bank's participation in a guaranty issued by an agent for a syndication of lenders with respect to their borrower's letter of credit reimbursement obligations to another bank or financial institution is permissible under I.R. 7.1016. (08/14/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0738.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 740 Letter advises the Bank as follows: 1) The question of whether "salary" as used in 12 C.F.R. 2.4 includes an officer's base salary, bonuses, director's fees and/or any other compensation paid by the Bank must be determined by the Bank's management; 2) the question of whether the payment bonuses for credit life sales under 12 C.F.R. 2.4 is based on salary received by the recipient in a calendar year, a fiscal year, or any 12-month period must be determined by the Bank's management; and 3) pursuant to 12 C.F.R. 2.4, if the Bank's CEO is a loan officer and the CEO participates in the bonus plan under which payments based on credit life insurance sales are made, the CEO must be included in averaging the salaries of loan officers that participate in the Bank's bonus or incentive plan. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0740.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 741 National bank may acquire majority interest in company which operates call center facility which operates programs by which potential customers for new or used automobiles may access databases containing information on the used and new car inventories of numerous automobile dealerships in its metropolitan area. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0741.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0950. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.
