# OCC Interpretive Letter No. 912: Letter concludes that a mutual fund containing general obligation and municipal revenue bonds: [1] is a permissible investment for national banks under 12 CFR Part 1.3(h)(2), [2] has a risk-weight dependent on the composition of the fund's assets, but in no event will the minimum risk-weight be less that 20%, and [3] can be accounted for as either a "trading" or "available-for-sale" asset

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0912

## Section

- **Citation:** OCC Interpretive Letter No. 912
- **Heading:** Letter concludes that a mutual fund containing general obligation and municipal revenue bonds: [1] is a permissible investment for national banks under 12 CFR Part 1.3(h)(2), [2] has a risk-weight dependent on the composition of the fund's assets, but in no event will the minimum risk-weight be less that 20%, and [3] can be accounted for as either a "trading" or "available-for-sale" asset
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** OCC Interpretive Letters / Letter concludes that a mutual fund containing general obligation and municipal revenue bonds: [1] is a permissible investment for national banks under 12 CFR Part 1.3(h)(2), [2] has a risk-weight dependent on the composition of the fund's assets, but in no event will the minimum risk-weight be less that 20%, and [3] can be accounted for as either a "trading" or "available-for-sale" asset.

## Text

O
Comptroller of the Currency
Administrator of National Banks
Washington, DC 20219
July 3, 2001 Interpretive Letter #912
August 2001
12 CFR Part 1
Re:
Bank Qualified Mutual Fund
Dear [ ]:
This letter responds to your request that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”)
determine that [ ] Funds’ proposed “Bank Qualified Mutual Fund” (“Fund”) is a
permissible investment for national banks under 12 C.F.R. Part 1. Assuming the permissibility
of a national bank’s investment in the Fund, you ask what investment limit and risk-weight a
purchasing bank should apply to the investment, and whether the investment should be
accounted for as “held-to-maturity” or “available-for-sale.”1 For the reasons discussed below,
and subject to the limitations described herein, we conclude that: [1] the Fund is a permissible
investment for national banks under 12 C.F.R. § 1.3(h)(2),2 [2] the risk-weight assigned to the
Fund will depend on the composition of the Fund’s assets, but in no event will the minimum
risk-weight be less than 20%, and [3] the investment can be accounted for as either a “trading” or
“available-for-sale” asset.
I. Background
The Fund will hold primarily general obligation and municipal revenue bonds that are designated
by the Issuer as bank qualified.3 The Fund will purchase municipal revenue bonds that are rated

1 You also question the capital gain or loss ramifications, and the tax-exempt status, of Fund investments. We
express no view on these issues.
2 If the Fund is an affiliate of the [ ] (“Bank”), any investments by the Bank and its
affiliated depository institutions in the Fund would be subject to 12 U.S.C. §§ 371c and 371c-1.
3 The Fund will purchase municipal bonds based upon an assessment of a bond’s relative value in terms of current
yield, price, credit quality, and future prospects
e issues.
2 If the Fund is an affiliate of the [ ] (“Bank”), any investments by the Bank and its
affiliated depository institutions in the Fund would be subject to 12 U.S.C. §§ 371c and 371c-1.
3 The Fund will purchase municipal bonds based upon an assessment of a bond’s relative value in terms of current
yield, price, credit quality, and future prospects. The Fund also will monitor the continued creditworthiness of its

-2-
investment grade (i.e., AAA/Aaa to BBB/Baa) at the time of purchase by independent rating
agencies. The Fund also may buy non-rated municipal revenue bonds if the investment adviser
judges them to be the equivalent of investment grade.
The Fund proposes to hold securities with five to fifteen year average maturities, with no more
than 5% invested in any one issuer. The Fund plans to diversify across states and territories. It
will use short term Treasuries or a Treasury Obligation Mutual Fund as the cash equivalent
vehicle in the Fund.
II. Discussion
Under 12 C.F.R. Part 1, a national bank may purchase for its own account shares in a mutual
fund with a portfolio consisting of bank eligible investment securities.4 National banks must
conduct an independent review of a mutual fund’s holdings to determine whether its portfolio
consists of bank eligible investment securities and to determine applicable legal investment
limitations under 12 U.S.C. § 24(Seventh) and 12 C.F.R. Part 1 (“Part 1”). The minimum risk-
weight that a national bank can apply to a mutual fund investment is 20%. A national bank’s
intent or purpose in acquiring mutual fund shares determines whether the investment can be
accounted for as a “trading” or “available-for-sale” asset.
A
ities and to determine applicable legal investment
limitations under 12 U.S.C. § 24(Seventh) and 12 C.F.R. Part 1 (“Part 1”). The minimum risk-
weight that a national bank can apply to a mutual fund investment is 20%. A national bank’s
intent or purpose in acquiring mutual fund shares determines whether the investment can be
accounted for as a “trading” or “available-for-sale” asset.
A. National Bank Authority to Purchase Mutual Fund Shares
A national bank may purchase for its own account, shares of an investment company, e.g., a
mutual fund with a portfolio consisting solely of obligations that are eligible for investment by a
national bank.5 Similarly, a national bank may invest in a fund that is exempt from registration
as an investment company.6
Section 24(Seventh)7 and Part 1 address national bank investments in bank-eligible
investment securities. In general, Section 24(Seventh) permits national banks to
purchase “investment securities” for their own account provided the aggregate par value
of investment securities held by the bank issued by any one obligor does not exceed 10%
of the bank’s capital and surplus. The Section 24(Seventh) definition of investment
securities includes “marketable obligations, evidencing the indebtedness of any person,
copartnership, association, or corporation in the form of bonds, notes and/or debentures,

municipal investments, and analyze economic, political, and demographic trends affecting the municipal markets.
4 National banks may purchase investment company shares for their own account based on other authorities, subject
to applicable limits. See OCC Interpretive Letter No. 897 (October 23, 2000), reprinted in [2000-20001 Transfer
Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81-416.
5 See 12 C.F.R. § 1.3(h)(1)(i).
6 See 12 C.F.R. § 1.3(h)(2).
7 See 12 U.S.C. § 24(Seventh).
ffecting the municipal markets.
4 National banks may purchase investment company shares for their own account based on other authorities, subject
to applicable limits. See OCC Interpretive Letter No. 897 (October 23, 2000), reprinted in [2000-20001 Transfer
Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81-416.
5 See 12 C.F.R. § 1.3(h)(1)(i).
6 See 12 C.F.R. § 1.3(h)(2).
7 See 12 U.S.C. § 24(Seventh).

-3-
commonly known as ‘investment securities.’” Part 1 defines an “investment security’ as
“a marketable debt obligation that is not predominantly speculative in nature.”8
Section 24(Seventh) and Part 1 exempt certain types of investment securities from the
10% investment limitation and permit a national bank to underwrite, deal in, purchase
and sell those securities without quantitative limitation, e.g., obligations issued by, or
backed by the full faith and credit of, the U.S. Part 1, which classifies permissible
national bank investment securities into several categories or types, classifies these
investments as Type I investments.9
Section 151 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA),10 amended Section 24(Seventh) to
exempt municipal revenue bonds from the 10% investment limitation. To qualify for the
exemption, a national bank must be “well capitalized” under prompt corrective action
standards.11 Specifically, Section 24(Seventh), as amended, permits national banks to
deal in, underwrite, or purchase limited obligation bonds, revenue bonds, obligations that
satisfy the requirements of section 142(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or
other obligations issued by or on behalf of any State or political subdivision of a State,
including any municipal corporate instrumentality of 1 or more States, or of a State.12
Accordingly, municipal revenue bonds qualify under Part 1 as Type I investment
securities for well-capitalized national banks
ns that
satisfy the requirements of section 142(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or
other obligations issued by or on behalf of any State or political subdivision of a State,
including any municipal corporate instrumentality of 1 or more States, or of a State.12
Accordingly, municipal revenue bonds qualify under Part 1 as Type I investment
securities for well-capitalized national banks. Indeed, the OCC has issued a notice of
proposed rulemaking that, if adopted, would amend Part 1’s list of Type I securities to
include municipal bonds as defined in the GLBA amendment to Section 24(Seventh) for
well capitalized national banks.13
If a national bank is not well capitalized, it may purchase and hold municipal revenue
bonds as Type III investment securities.14 Part 1 permits a national bank to purchase and

8 12 C.F.R. § 1.2(e). A security is not predominantly speculative in nature if it is rated investment grade. When a
security is not rated, the security must be the credit equivalent of a security rated investment grade. Id.
9 12 C.F.R. §§ 1.2(i) and 1.3(a). You represent that, in addition to municipal revenue bonds, the Fund will hold only
Type I investment securities.
10 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Pub. L. No. 106-102, § 151, 113 Stat. 1338, 1384 (1999) (codified at 12 U.S.C. §
24(Seventh)); see also 12 C.F.R. § 1.2(i)(5).
11 Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1831o, states that “[a]n insured depository
institution is ‘well capitalized’ if it significantly exceeds the required minimum level for each relevant capital
measure.” 12 U.S.C. § 1831o(b)(1)(A). Section 38 also states that “[e]ach appropriate Federal banking agency
shall, by regulation, specify for each relevant capital measure the levels at which an insured depository institution is
well capitalized.” 12 U.S.C. § 1831o(c)(2). The OCC defines “well capitalized” for national banks at 12 C.F.R. §
6.4(b)(1).
12 Footnote 10, supra
ch relevant capital
measure.” 12 U.S.C. § 1831o(b)(1)(A). Section 38 also states that “[e]ach appropriate Federal banking agency
shall, by regulation, specify for each relevant capital measure the levels at which an insured depository institution is
well capitalized.” 12 U.S.C. § 1831o(c)(2). The OCC defines “well capitalized” for national banks at 12 C.F.R. §
6.4(b)(1).
12 Footnote 10, supra.
13 OCC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 66 Fed. Reg. 8178 (2001)(“NPR”). The comment period for the NPR
closes on April 2, 2001.
14 12 C.F.R. § 1.2(k). The NPR, if adopted, will make clear that Type III securities include municipal bonds that do
not satisfy the definition of a Type I security.

-4-
sell Type III investment securities, provided the aggregate par value of investment
securities held by the bank issued by any one obligor does not exceed 10% of the bank’s
capital and surplus.15 To qualify as a Type III security, a municipal revenue bond must
be rated investment grade or, if not rated, the credit equivalent of investment grade, and
marketable.16 “Investment grade” means a security that is rated in one of the four highest
rating categories by two or more nationally recognized statistical rating organizations
(NRSRO) or by one NRSRO if the security is rated only by one NRSRO.17 A security is
the credit equivalent of a security rated investment grade if, after a sufficient analysis, the
bank makes that determination
rade, and
marketable.16 “Investment grade” means a security that is rated in one of the four highest
rating categories by two or more nationally recognized statistical rating organizations
(NRSRO) or by one NRSRO if the security is rated only by one NRSRO.17 A security is
the credit equivalent of a security rated investment grade if, after a sufficient analysis, the
bank makes that determination. A debt security is “marketable,” if it is: [1] registered
under the Securities Act of 1933 (‘33 Act);18 [2] exempt from registration as a municipal
revenue bond under the ‘33 Act;19 [3] offered and sold under Rule 144A20 and rated
investment grade or is the credit equivalent thereof;21 or [4] can be sold with reasonable
promptness at a price that corresponds reasonably to its fair value.22
National banks that hold mutual fund shares, the portfolios of which do not qualify as
Type I securities,23 must use reasonable efforts to calculate and combine its pro rata share
of a particular security in the portfolio of each fund with the bank’s direct holdings of
that security.24 A bank’s direct holdings of a particular security and the bank’s pro rata

15 12 C.F.R. § 1.3(c); OCC Interpretive Letter No. 777 (April 8, 1997), reprinted in [1997 Transfer Binder] Fed.
Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81-204; OCC Interpretive Letter No. 781 (April 9, 1997), reprinted in [1997 Transfer
Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81-208.
16 See 12 C.F.R. §§ 1.2(e) and (f)(2).
17 See 12 C.F.R. §§ 1.2(d) and (g).
18 See 15 U.S.C. § 77a, et seq.
19 See 15 U.S.C. § 77c(a)(2).
20 See 17 C.F.R. § 230.144A.
21 See 12 C.F.R § 1.2(f).
22 Id. OCC regulations also state that, notwithstanding the definitions of “investment grade” and “investment
security” in Part 1, a national bank may treat a debt security as an investment security, based on the bank’s reliable
estimates that the obligor will be able to satisfy its obligations under that security. See 12 C.F.R. § 1.3(i)(1)
See 17 C.F.R. § 230.144A.
21 See 12 C.F.R § 1.2(f).
22 Id. OCC regulations also state that, notwithstanding the definitions of “investment grade” and “investment
security” in Part 1, a national bank may treat a debt security as an investment security, based on the bank’s reliable
estimates that the obligor will be able to satisfy its obligations under that security. See 12 C.F.R. § 1.3(i)(1). The
“reliable estimates” provision allows a bank to invest in a below investment grade security, i.e., in a category below
one of a rating agency’s four highest categories, provided that the bank satisfies itself that the securities may be sold
with reasonable promptness at a price that corresponds reasonably to their fair value. Id. National banks may
purchase securities under the “reliable estimates” standard in an aggregate amount no greater than 5% of their capital
and surplus. See 12 C.F.R. § 1.3(i)(2). This limit applies against all securities in their portfolios acquired
predominantly on the basis of reliable estimates, rather than on a per issuer basis. Id.
23 The OCC has a long-standing policy of permitting a national bank to treat investments that are backed by Type I
securities as Type I securities. See Security Pacific v. Clarke, 885 F.2d 1034 (2nd Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S.
1070 (1990); OCC Interpretive Letter No. 514 (May 5, 1990), reprinted in [1990-1991 Transfer Binder] Fed.
Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 83,218; OCC Interpretive Letter No. 378 (April 24, 1987), reprinted in [1988-1989
Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 85,602.
24 See 12 C.F. R. § 1.4(e)(1).
I securities. See Security Pacific v. Clarke, 885 F.2d 1034 (2nd Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S.
1070 (1990); OCC Interpretive Letter No. 514 (May 5, 1990), reprinted in [1990-1991 Transfer Binder] Fed.
Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 83,218; OCC Interpretive Letter No. 378 (April 24, 1987), reprinted in [1988-1989
Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 85,602.
24 See 12 C.F. R. § 1.4(e)(1).

-5-
interest in the same security in a mutual fund’s portfolio may not, in the aggregate,
exceed the investment limitation that would apply to that security. Alternatively, a
national bank may elect not to combine its pro rata interest in a particular security in a
mutual fund with the bank’s direct holdings of that security if: [i] the fund’s holdings of
the securities of any one issuer do not exceed 5% of its total portfolio; and [ii] the bank’s
total holdings of the fund’s shares do not exceed the most stringent investment limitation
that would apply to any of the securities in the company’s portfolio if those securities
were purchased directly by the bank.25 National banks must conduct periodic reviews to
ensure that fund holdings do not exceed the most stringent investment limitation, relative
to the bank’s capital, that would apply to any of the securities if purchased directly.26
National bank management also must ensure that a particular mutual fund is an appropriate
investment for the bank’s investment portfolio.27 A national bank's board of directors has the
ultimate responsibility for deciding whether to invest in a mutual fund
d the most stringent investment limitation, relative
to the bank’s capital, that would apply to any of the securities if purchased directly.26
National bank management also must ensure that a particular mutual fund is an appropriate
investment for the bank’s investment portfolio.27 A national bank's board of directors has the
ultimate responsibility for deciding whether to invest in a mutual fund. Once that decision is
made, the bank’s board must review those holdings to determine whether a particular fund
continues to be appropriate for the bank’s investment portfolio.28 Banks purchasing securities
permitted under Part 1 must adhere to safe and sound banking practices and consider, as
appropriate, interest rate, credit, liquidity, price, foreign exchange, transaction, compliance,
strategic, and reputation risk.29
To the extent that the municipal revenue bonds held by the Fund are permissible investments for
national banks under the criteria above, national banks may use their authority under Section
24(Seventh) and Part 1 to purchase Fund shares. If the purchasing bank is well capitalized under
prompt corrective action standards, the investment may be treated as a Type I investment
because the municipal revenue bonds and the other investments of the Fund are Type I
investments. As a Type I investment, national bank purchases of the Fund’s shares would not be
subject to an investment limitation.
Conversely, if the bank purchasing Fund shares is not well capitalized, then the Fund shares
could qualify as Type III investment securities, provided that applicable rating and marketability
requirements are met. Under these circumstances, the investing bank could combine any direct
holdings it had of a particular municipal revenue bond issuer with its pro rata interest by the
same bond issuer held in the Fund’s portfolio, subject to a 10% investment limitation
zed, then the Fund shares
could qualify as Type III investment securities, provided that applicable rating and marketability
requirements are met. Under these circumstances, the investing bank could combine any direct
holdings it had of a particular municipal revenue bond issuer with its pro rata interest by the
same bond issuer held in the Fund’s portfolio, subject to a 10% investment limitation.
Alternatively, an investing bank could choose not to combine its Type III holdings in Fund with
its direct holdings, if the Fund’s holdings of any issuer do not exceed 5% of the Fund’s total

25 See 12 C.F.R. § 1.4(e)(2).
26 Banking Circular No. 220 (November 21, 1986) Investment in Investment Companies Composed Wholly of Bank
Eligible Investments. (“BC-220”).
27 Id.
28 Id.
29 12 C.F.R. § 1.5(a).

-6-
portfolio, in which case the bank could not invest more than 10% of its capital in Fund, i.e., the
most stringent investment limitation applicable to the Fund under this scenario.30
B. Risk-Weighting
For regulatory capital purposes, a national bank’s asset portfolio is divided into four categories.
Each category is assigned a risk-weight percentage that in theory reflects the risk level of the
assets within that category.31 In the case of mutual fund investments, the assets represent an
indirect holding of a pool of assets that encompass more that one risk-weight within the pool.32
Thus, the OCC generally allows a national bank to risk-weight its total investment in a mutual
fund in the risk category appropriate to the highest risk-weighted asset the fund holds,
consistent with the investment limits the fund incorporates into its prospectus.33 Alternatively,
the OCC affords national banks the option of assigning fund investments to different risk
categories on a pro rata basis according to the investment limits in the fund's prospectus.34 The
OCC believes that it is more prudent to base risk-weight distributions on investment limits than
on a fund's actual underl
with the investment limits the fund incorporates into its prospectus.33 Alternatively,
the OCC affords national banks the option of assigning fund investments to different risk
categories on a pro rata basis according to the investment limits in the fund's prospectus.34 The
OCC believes that it is more prudent to base risk-weight distributions on investment limits than
on a fund's actual underlying assets because actual fund holdings can change significantly from
day-to-day.35
Regardless of the risk-weighting method used, the minimum risk-weight that may be assigned to
a fund is 20% -- a mutual fund has certain credit, transaction, and compliance risks that
necessitate a risk-weight greater then zero percent.36 Furthermore, if the bank assigns fund
assets to risk categories on a pro rata basis, and the sum of the investment limits in the fund’s
prospectus exceeds 100%, the bank must assign the highest pro rata amounts of its total
investment to the highest risk categories.37

30 If the Fund’s municipal bond issue is not rated, not the credit equivalent of investment grade or rated below
investment grade, a national bank may treat the Fund investment as an investment in investment securities if it
concludes that: [1] the obligor could satisfy its obligations under the security (based on “reliable estimates”) and [2]
the security could be sold with reasonable promptness at a price that corresponds reasonably to its fair value. The
purchasing bank’s pro rata interest in the bonds would be combined will all of its other “reliable estimates”
investments and subject to a 5% investment limitation. Conversely, provided that the Fund does not hold more than
5% of the securities of any one issuer, a national bank could include its entire investment in the Fund in its 5%
“reliable estimates” investment limitation if the investment in the Fund satisfied the criteria described above.
31 12 C.F.R. Part 3, Appendix A
ther “reliable estimates”
investments and subject to a 5% investment limitation. Conversely, provided that the Fund does not hold more than
5% of the securities of any one issuer, a national bank could include its entire investment in the Fund in its 5%
“reliable estimates” investment limitation if the investment in the Fund satisfied the criteria described above.
31 12 C.F.R. Part 3, Appendix A. The risk-weights for national bank assets and off-balance sheet items, range from
zero to 100 %. The higher the risk-weight percentage, the riskier the asset category. For example, the risk-weight
percentage for private loans is 100%, while the risk-weight percentage for government securities is 0%. Thus, no
capital is necessary to offset government securities, while 100% of the specified minimum capital levels must be
held against a bank's loans.
32 Id., at Section 3.
33 Id.
34 Id.
35 12 C.F.R. Part 3, Appendix A, Section 3; Final Rule, Risk-Based Capital Standards, 64 Fed. Reg. 10194 (March
2, 1999).
36 Id.
37 Id.

-7-
Where a mutual fund is permitted to hold an immaterial amount of highly liquid, high quality
securities ineligible for a preferential risk-weight, then those securities may be disregarded in
determining the fund's risk-weight. However, if a fund engages in any activities that are
speculative in nature or has any other characteristics that are inconsistent with the preferential
risk-weighting assigned to the Fund's assets, then a national bank’s investment in the fund will
be assigned to the 100% risk-weight category.38
In summary, a purchasing bank may risk-weight its total investment in the Fund in the risk
category appropriate to the highest risk-weighted asset the Fund holds, consistent with the
Fund’s investment limits as set forth in its prospectus. Otherwise, a purchasing bank may assign
the Fund’s investments to different risk categories on a pro rata basis according to the investment
limits in the Fund's prospectus
a purchasing bank may risk-weight its total investment in the Fund in the risk
category appropriate to the highest risk-weighted asset the Fund holds, consistent with the
Fund’s investment limits as set forth in its prospectus. Otherwise, a purchasing bank may assign
the Fund’s investments to different risk categories on a pro rata basis according to the investment
limits in the Fund's prospectus. In any case, the minimum risk-weight that may be assigned to a
Fund is 20%.
C. Mutual Fund Accounting Classification
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Board No. 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (“FASB 115”) identifies the categories among which
national banks must divide their securities holdings as held-to-maturity, trading, and available-
for-sale, and provides a different accounting treatment for each category. FASB 115 permits a
national bank to include a security in the held-to-maturity category only if the bank has “the
positive intent and ability to hold the security to maturity.” Trading securities are those debt and
equity securities that a bank buys and holds principally for the purpose of selling in the near
term. Securities in the available-for-sale category are securities a bank does not have the
positive intent and ability to hold to maturity, yet does not intend to trade them actively as part of
its trading account.
National banks that invest in mutual funds give up the ability to control whether the underlying
securities are held-to-maturity. A national bank’s intent or purpose in acquiring the Fund’s
shares will determine whether the investment should be accounted for as a “trading” or
“available-for-sale” asset. When a national bank acquires mutual fund shares and at each
subsequent reporting date, it must evaluate whether the investment should be accounted for as a
“trading” or “available-for-sale” asset
ties are held-to-maturity. A national bank’s intent or purpose in acquiring the Fund’s
shares will determine whether the investment should be accounted for as a “trading” or
“available-for-sale” asset. When a national bank acquires mutual fund shares and at each
subsequent reporting date, it must evaluate whether the investment should be accounted for as a
“trading” or “available-for-sale” asset. If the mutual fund was bought principally to sell the
investment in the near term, it should be accounted for as trading and marked to market through
earnings. Otherwise, the mutual fund investment should be accounted for as an available-for-
sale asset and recorded at its fair value.
III. Conclusion
Under 12 C.F.R. Part 1, a national bank may invest in the Fund under its authority to invest in

38 Id.

-8-
mutual funds with portfolios that consist exclusively of bank eligible assets. Individual banks
must determine the appropriate investment limits, based on the limitations of Section
24(Seventh), Part 1, and BC-220. The minimum risk-weight that a national bank can assign to
the Fund is 20%. A national bank’s intent or purpose in acquiring Fund shares will determine
whether the investment should be accounted for as a “trading” or “available-for-sale” asset.
Our position is based on the facts and representations made in your letter and phone
conversations, and any material changes in the facts or conditions may result in a different
conclusion. We take no position on whether the proposed Fund is a permissible investment for
State member banks. The OCC does not endorse specific investments and this letter should not
be used in a manner that suggests otherwise. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me at (202) 874-5210.
Sincerely,
-signed-
Tena M. Alexander
Counsel
Securities & Corporate Practices Division

## Nearby sections

- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 719 Letter concludes that an ESOP is a "company' for purposes of 12 U.S.C. 371c and that an ESOP that controls at least 25% of a bank's voting stock is an "affiliate" under sec. 371c (supersedes existing OCC interpretive letter #261). (10/26/89)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0719.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 720 Group of affiliate national banks may collectively own, through operating subsidiaries, minority interest in a merchant credit card processing subsidiary. (01/26/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0720.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 722 A national bank may invest CIF assets in mutual funds, including mutual funds that pay the bank a servicing fee, without the bank having to reduce its trustee fees, if the bank concludes, based upon a reasoned opinion of trust counsel, that such an arrangement is authorized by applicable state law, is consistent with the trust instrument, is appropriate for the particular trust accounts, and is consistent with OCC regulations, including in particular 12 C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12). (03/12/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0722.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 724 Bank can sell vehicle service contracts to customers who use home equity loan proceeds to purchase a vehicle, and the maturity of the service contract may be different from the maturity of the loan. (04/22/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0724.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 725 National bank to establish an operating subsidiary to engage in permissible derivatives-related activities. (05/10/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0725.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 726 Letter concerns the application of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations to financial institutions' support of microenterprise lending programs. (06/21/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0726.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 730 Letter concludes that loans proposed by the bank to an unaffiliated distributor of mutual funds would not be subject to interaffiliate lending restrictions contained in 12 U.S.C. 371C. (05/29/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0730.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 732 National bank may make a 5.5% investment in software company which is engaged in the design, development, marketing and maintenance of a network for electronic funds transfers and electronic data interchange, including transacting electronic commerce and marketing software products for use on its world-wide electronic commerce network. (05/10/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0732.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 733 National bank receiver is subject to the rights of secured creditors and creditors entitled to setoff. U.S. legal principles regarding enforcement of security interests are applicable to a receivership of a federal branch or agency conducted under National Bank Act. Therefore, receiver of an uninsured federal branch or agency does not have the right to interfere with the rights of secured creditors, including application of collateral held in U.S. to obligations of a non-U.S. office of the bank. (06/19/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0733.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 736 Lending limit exception for participations not limited to banks. Non-banks may act as participants. (07/25/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0736.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 737 Huntington National Bank's acquisition of minority interest in a limited liability company providing stored value systems. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0737.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 738 National bank's participation in a guaranty issued by an agent for a syndication of lenders with respect to their borrower's letter of credit reimbursement obligations to another bank or financial institution is permissible under I.R. 7.1016. (08/14/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0738.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 740 Letter advises the Bank as follows: 1) The question of whether "salary" as used in 12 C.F.R. 2.4 includes an officer's base salary, bonuses, director's fees and/or any other compensation paid by the Bank must be determined by the Bank's management; 2) the question of whether the payment bonuses for credit life sales under 12 C.F.R. 2.4 is based on salary received by the recipient in a calendar year, a fiscal year, or any 12-month period must be determined by the Bank's management; and 3) pursuant to 12 C.F.R. 2.4, if the Bank's CEO is a loan officer and the CEO participates in the bonus plan under which payments based on credit life insurance sales are made, the CEO must be included in averaging the salaries of loan officers that participate in the Bank's bonus or incentive plan. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0740.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 741 National bank may acquire majority interest in company which operates call center facility which operates programs by which potential customers for new or used automobiles may access databases containing information on the used and new car inventories of numerous automobile dealerships in its metropolitan area. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0741.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0912. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.