# OCC Interpretive Letter No. 898: Letter confirms that a national bank may lawfully acquire and hold a ten to twenty percent non-controlling equity interest in a holding company engaged in the origination, purchase and securitization of prime auto leases

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0898

## Section

- **Citation:** OCC Interpretive Letter No. 898
- **Heading:** Letter confirms that a national bank may lawfully acquire and hold a ten to twenty percent non-controlling equity interest in a holding company engaged in the origination, purchase and securitization of prime auto leases
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** OCC Interpretive Letters / Letter confirms that a national bank may lawfully acquire and hold a ten to twenty percent non-controlling equity interest in a holding company engaged in the origination, purchase and securitization of prime auto leases.

## Text

The [ ] preferred stock is immediately convertible into common stock.
1
Comptroller of the Currency
Administrator of National Banks
Washington D.C. 20219
Interpretive Letter #898
July 14, 1998
December 2000
12 USC 24(7)
12 USC 24(10)
Dear [ ]:
This is in response to your letter dated May 7, 1998, requesting confirmation that [
] (“Bank”), may lawfully acquire and hold a ten to twenty
percent non-controlling equity interest in [ ] (“ ”), a
holding company engaged in the origination, purchase and securitization of prime auto leases. For
the reasons set forth below, it is our opinion that this transaction is legally permissible in the manner
and as described herein.
I.
Background
The Bank proposes to acquire a non-controlling equity interest [ ] in exchange for
providing warehouse financing for [ ] and thereby reducing the cost of funds for [ ]’s
wholly-owned operating leasing subsidiary, [ ] (“OpSub”).
[ ] conducts its origination, purchase and securitization of prime auto leases as authorized for
national banks under 12 C.F.R. § 5.34(e)(2)(ii)(M). Bank will acquire an equity interest in [ ] in
connection with a financing strategy designed to reduce [OpSub]’s cost of funds. On the closing
date of the proposed warehouse financing with Bank, and as additional consideration for such
financing, [ ] will issue to Bank a warrant to purchase preferred or common stock entitling Bank
to 10 percent of [ ]’s common stock
.34(e)(2)(ii)(M). Bank will acquire an equity interest in [ ] in
connection with a financing strategy designed to reduce [OpSub]’s cost of funds. On the closing
date of the proposed warehouse financing with Bank, and as additional consideration for such
financing, [ ] will issue to Bank a warrant to purchase preferred or common stock entitling Bank
to 10 percent of [ ]’s common stock. As long as the warehouse financing remains in place,
1
Bank will receive additional warrants to purchase preferred or common stock entitling Bank to a
maximum of an additional 10 percent of [ ]’s common stock, thereby raising Bank’s equity
interest in [ ] to as much as 20 percent of [ ]’s common stock.

- 2 -
Bank anticipates that [ ], Inc. (formerly [ ] Corp.), a securities
2
subsidiary affiliate of Bank, will serve as placement agent or underwriter in the issuance of the trust certificates to
institutional investors.
The OCC recently amended its operating subsidiary rule, 12 C.F.R. § 5.34, as part of a general revision of Part
3
5 under the OCC’s Regulation Review Program. Operating subsidiaries in which a national bank may invest include
corporations, limited liability companies, or similar entities if the parent owns (1) more than 50 percent of the voting (or
similar type of controlling) interest, or (2) less than 50% so long as the bank “controls” the subsidiary and no other party
controls more than 50 percent. 12 C.F.R. § 5.34(d)(2). Here, [ ] will not be considered an operating subsidiary since
the Bank will not “control” [ ].
See, e.g., Interpretive Letter No. 697, reprinted in [1995-1996 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶
4
81-013 (November 15, 1995); Interpretive Letter No. 732, reprinted in [1995-1996 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep.
(CCH) ¶ 81-049 (May 10, 1996). See also 12 C.F.R. § 5.36(b)
[ ] will not be considered an operating subsidiary since
the Bank will not “control” [ ].
See, e.g., Interpretive Letter No. 697, reprinted in [1995-1996 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶
4
81-013 (November 15, 1995); Interpretive Letter No. 732, reprinted in [1995-1996 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep.
(CCH) ¶ 81-049 (May 10, 1996). See also 12 C.F.R. § 5.36(b). National banks are permitted to make various types of
equity investments pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 24(Seventh) and other statutes.
Bank will lend funds on a revolving basis to a subsidiary of [ OpSub ] that will hold the
beneficial interest in the lease assets. As payments are collected on the automobile leases, they will
either be passed on to Bank to reduce outstanding balances under the revolving loans or invested in
the acquisition of new leases. In addition, [ ] and [OpSub] will establish a titling trust in order to
fasciliate the securitization of automobile lease assets. The leases in the titling trust will be
securitized by identifying a discrete pool of leases and subsequently transferred to a securitization
trust as collateral for a securitization. The proceeds from the issuance of trust certificates by the
securitization trust will be used to repay the funds advanced by Bank.2
II.
Discussion
National Bank Express and Incidental Powers (12 U.S.C. § 24(Seventh))
The Bank’s plan to purchase and hold up to a 20 percent interest in [ ] raises the issue of the
authority of a national bank to make a non-controlling investment in an entity. A number of recent
3
OCC Interpretive Letters have analyzed the authority of national banks, either directly or through
their subsidiaries, to own a non-controlling interest in an enterprise. These letters each concluded
that the ownership of such an interest is permissible provided four standards, drawn from OCC
precedents, are satisfied. They are:
4
1
non-controlling investment in an entity. A number of recent
3
OCC Interpretive Letters have analyzed the authority of national banks, either directly or through
their subsidiaries, to own a non-controlling interest in an enterprise. These letters each concluded
that the ownership of such an interest is permissible provided four standards, drawn from OCC
precedents, are satisfied. They are:
4
1.
The activities of the entity or enterprise in which the investment is made must be
limited to activities that are part of, or incidental to, the business of banking;
2.
The bank must be able to prevent the enterprise from engaging in activities that do
not meet the foregoing standard, or be able to withdraw its investment;

- 3 -
See, e.g., Interpretive Letter No. 380, reprinted in [1988-1989 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH)
5
¶ 85,604 n.8 (December 29, 1986) (since a national bank can provide options clearing services to customers it can
purchase stock in a corporation providing options clearing services); Letter from Robert B. Serino, Deputy Chief Counsel
(November 9, 1992) (since the operation of an ATM network is “a fundamental part of the basic business of banking,”
an equity investment in a corporation operating such a network is permissible).
See, e.g., OCC Interpretive Letter No. 585, reprinted in [1992-1993 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH)
6
¶ 83-406 (June 8, 1992) (automobile loan receivables); Interpretive Letter No. 416, reprinted in [1988-1989 Transfer Binder]
Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 85-640 (February 16, 1988) ( leases and motor vehicle installment sales contracts).
3.
The bank’s loss exposure must be limited, as a legal and accounting matter, and the
bank must not have open-ended liability for the obligations of the enterprise; and
4.
The investment must be convenient and useful to the bank in carrying out its
business and not a mere passive investment unrelated to that bank’s banking
business
, 1988) ( leases and motor vehicle installment sales contracts).
3.
The bank’s loss exposure must be limited, as a legal and accounting matter, and the
bank must not have open-ended liability for the obligations of the enterprise; and
4.
The investment must be convenient and useful to the bank in carrying out its
business and not a mere passive investment unrelated to that bank’s banking
business.
Based upon the facts presented, the Bank’s proposal satisfies these four standards.
1.
The activities of the entity or enterprise in which the investment is made must
be limited to activities that are part of, or incidental to, the business of
banking.
Our precedents on non-controlling ownership have recognized that the enterprise in which the bank
holds an interest must confine its activities to those that are part of, or incidental to, the conduct of
the banking business.5
As discussed above, Bank has represented that [ ] and its subsidiaries will engage in the
organization, purchase and securitization of prime auto leases as authorized for national banks by
12 C.F.R. § 5.34(e)(2)(ii)(M). See also, 12 U.S.C. §§ 24(Seventh) (lending and leasing activities)
and 24(Tenth)( (leasing activities); and 12 C.F.R. Part 23 (personal property leasing). The sale of
such assets to a third party for the purposes of securitization is permissible for national banks under
a long line of OCC precedents recognizing the authority of national banks to sell loan assets and
further recognizing that the Glass Steagall Act does not restrict the means by which national banks
may sell such assets. Thus, we conclude that the activities to be conducted by [ ] are
6
activities that are part of, or incidental to, the business of banking.
2.
The bank must be able to prevent the enterprise from engaging in activities
that do not meet the foregoing standard, or be able to withdraw its
investment.
lass Steagall Act does not restrict the means by which national banks
may sell such assets. Thus, we conclude that the activities to be conducted by [ ] are
6
activities that are part of, or incidental to, the business of banking.
2.
The bank must be able to prevent the enterprise from engaging in activities
that do not meet the foregoing standard, or be able to withdraw its
investment.

- 4 -
See, e.g., Interpretive Letter No. 711, reprinted in [1995-1996 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶
7
81-026 (February 3, 1996); Interpretive Letter No. 625, reprinted in [1993-1994 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep.
(CCH) ¶ 83,507 (July 1, 1993).
The activities of the enterprise in which a national bank may invest must be part of, or incidental to,
the business of banking not only at the time the bank first acquires its ownership, but for as long as
the bank has an ownership interest. This standard may be met if the bank is able to exercise a veto
power over the activities of the enterprise, or is able to dispose of its interest. This ensures that the
bank will not become involved in impermissible activities.7
Bank will have the ability to prevent [ ] and its subsidiaries from engaging in impermissible
activities consistent with prior OCC interpretive letters. The bylaws of [ ] will be amended to
provide that [ ] and its subsidiaries shall only engage in activities that are permissible for
national banks and that Bank shall have the right to veto any proposed activities that are not
permissible for national banks. In addition, the bylaws of [ ] also will be amended to provide
that the business and operations of [ ] and its subsidiaries will be subject to the regulation,
supervision and examination of the OCC.
Therefore, the second standard is satisfied.
3.
The bank’s loss exposure must be limited, as a legal and accounting matter,
and the bank must not have open-ended liability for the obligations of the
enterprise.
a
] also will be amended to provide
that the business and operations of [ ] and its subsidiaries will be subject to the regulation,
supervision and examination of the OCC.
Therefore, the second standard is satisfied.
3.
The bank’s loss exposure must be limited, as a legal and accounting matter,
and the bank must not have open-ended liability for the obligations of the
enterprise.
a. Loss exposure from a legal standpoint
A primary concern of the OCC is that national banks should not be subjected to undue risk.
Where an investing bank will not control the operations of the entity in which the bank holds an
interest, it is important that the national bank’s investment not expose it to unlimited liability. As a
legal matter, Bank’s losses will be limited by statute. Under Delaware law, the corporate structure
of [ ] will protect Bank from potentially unlimited exposure. Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, §§ 101 to
398. Thus, the Bank’s loss exposure for the liabilities of [ ] and its subsidiaries will be limited
by statute.
b. Loss exposure from an accounting standpoint
In assessing a bank’s loss exposure as an accounting matter, the OCC has previously noted that the
appropriate accounting treatment for a bank’s minority investment in a company is to report it as an
unconsolidated entity under the equity method of accounting. Under this method, unless the bank
has guaranteed any of the liabilities of the entity or has other financial obligations to the entity, losses
sessing a bank’s loss exposure as an accounting matter, the OCC has previously noted that the
appropriate accounting treatment for a bank’s minority investment in a company is to report it as an
unconsolidated entity under the equity method of accounting. Under this method, unless the bank
has guaranteed any of the liabilities of the entity or has other financial obligations to the entity, losses

- 5 -
See generally, Accounting Principles Board, Op. 18 § 19 (1971) (equity method of accounting for investments
8
in common stock). Interpretive Letter No. 692 (November 1, 1995), reprinted in [1995-1996 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking
L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81-007.
See, e.g., Interpretive Letter No. 697, supra; Interpretive Letter No. 543, reprinted in [1990-1991 Transfer
9
Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 83,255 (February 13, 1991); Interpretive Letter No. 427, reprinted in [1988-1989
Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 85,651 (May 9, 1988); Interpretive Letter No. 421, reprinted in [1988-1989
Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 85,645 (March 14, 1988); Interpretive Letter No. 380, supra.
are generally limited to the amount of the investment, including loans and other advances shown on
the investor’s books.
8
As proposed, Bank will have an ownership interest in [ ] from between 10 and 20 percent.
Bank will account for its investment in [ ] under the equity method of accounting. Thus, Bank’s
loss from an accounting perspective would be limited to the amount invested in [ ] and Bank will
not have any open-ended liability for the obligations of [ ] or its subsidiaries.
Therefore, for both legal and accounting purposes, Bank’s potential loss exposure relative to [
] and its subsidiaries should be limited to the amount of its investment in those entities. Since that
exposure will be quantifiable and controllable, the third standard is satisfied.
4
] and Bank will
not have any open-ended liability for the obligations of [ ] or its subsidiaries.
Therefore, for both legal and accounting purposes, Bank’s potential loss exposure relative to [
] and its subsidiaries should be limited to the amount of its investment in those entities. Since that
exposure will be quantifiable and controllable, the third standard is satisfied.
4.
The investment must be convenient and useful to the bank in carrying out its
business and not a mere passive investment unrelated to that bank’s banking
business.
Twelve U.S.C. § 24(Seventh) gives national banks incidental powers that are “necessary” to carry
on the business of banking. “Necessary” has been judicially construed to mean “convenient or
useful.” See Arnold Tours, Inc. v. Camp, 472 F.2d 427, 432 (1st Cir. 1972). Our precedents on
bank non-controlling investments have indicated that the investment must be convenient or useful to
the bank in conducting that bank’s business. The investment must benefit or facilitate that business
and cannot be a mere passive or speculative investment.
9
[ ] is an established automobile lending and leasing company. By expanding its role in the
automobile lending and leasing industry Bank will be able to gain valuable experience and expertise
through [ ], and leverage that experience and expertise for Bank’s own benefit and that of its
customers. For these reasons, Bank’s investment in the LLC is convenient and useful to Bank in
carrying out its business and is not a mere passive investment. Thus, the fourth standard is satisfied.
mobile lending and leasing industry Bank will be able to gain valuable experience and expertise
through [ ], and leverage that experience and expertise for Bank’s own benefit and that of its
customers. For these reasons, Bank’s investment in the LLC is convenient and useful to Bank in
carrying out its business and is not a mere passive investment. Thus, the fourth standard is satisfied.

- 6 -
III.
Conclusion
Based upon the information and representations you have provided, and for the reasons discussed
above, it is our opinion that Bank is legally permitted to acquire and hold a non-controlling interest
in [ ] in the manner and as described herein, subject to the following conditions:
1.
[ ] will engage only in activities that are part of, or incidental to, the business
of banking;
2.
Bank will have veto power over any activities and major decisions of [ ] that
are inconsistent with condition number one, or will withdraw from [ ] in the
event they engage in an activity that is inconsistent with condition number one;
3.
Bank will account for its investment in [ ] under the equity method of
accounting; and
4.
[ ] will be subject to OCC supervision, regulation, and examination.
These conditions are conditions imposed in writing by the OCC in connection with its action on the
request for a legal opinion confirming that Bank’s investment is permissible under 12 U.S.C. § 24
(Seventh) and, as such, may be enforced in proceedings under applicable law.
If you have any questions, please contact John Soboeiro, Senior Attorney, at (202) 874-5300.
Sincerely,
-signed-
Raymond Natter
Acting Chief Counsel

## Nearby sections

- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 719 Letter concludes that an ESOP is a "company' for purposes of 12 U.S.C. 371c and that an ESOP that controls at least 25% of a bank's voting stock is an "affiliate" under sec. 371c (supersedes existing OCC interpretive letter #261). (10/26/89)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0719.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 720 Group of affiliate national banks may collectively own, through operating subsidiaries, minority interest in a merchant credit card processing subsidiary. (01/26/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0720.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 722 A national bank may invest CIF assets in mutual funds, including mutual funds that pay the bank a servicing fee, without the bank having to reduce its trustee fees, if the bank concludes, based upon a reasoned opinion of trust counsel, that such an arrangement is authorized by applicable state law, is consistent with the trust instrument, is appropriate for the particular trust accounts, and is consistent with OCC regulations, including in particular 12 C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12). (03/12/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0722.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 724 Bank can sell vehicle service contracts to customers who use home equity loan proceeds to purchase a vehicle, and the maturity of the service contract may be different from the maturity of the loan. (04/22/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0724.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 725 National bank to establish an operating subsidiary to engage in permissible derivatives-related activities. (05/10/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0725.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 726 Letter concerns the application of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations to financial institutions' support of microenterprise lending programs. (06/21/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0726.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 730 Letter concludes that loans proposed by the bank to an unaffiliated distributor of mutual funds would not be subject to interaffiliate lending restrictions contained in 12 U.S.C. 371C. (05/29/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0730.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 732 National bank may make a 5.5% investment in software company which is engaged in the design, development, marketing and maintenance of a network for electronic funds transfers and electronic data interchange, including transacting electronic commerce and marketing software products for use on its world-wide electronic commerce network. (05/10/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0732.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 733 National bank receiver is subject to the rights of secured creditors and creditors entitled to setoff. U.S. legal principles regarding enforcement of security interests are applicable to a receivership of a federal branch or agency conducted under National Bank Act. Therefore, receiver of an uninsured federal branch or agency does not have the right to interfere with the rights of secured creditors, including application of collateral held in U.S. to obligations of a non-U.S. office of the bank. (06/19/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0733.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 736 Lending limit exception for participations not limited to banks. Non-banks may act as participants. (07/25/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0736.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 737 Huntington National Bank's acquisition of minority interest in a limited liability company providing stored value systems. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0737.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 738 National bank's participation in a guaranty issued by an agent for a syndication of lenders with respect to their borrower's letter of credit reimbursement obligations to another bank or financial institution is permissible under I.R. 7.1016. (08/14/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0738.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 740 Letter advises the Bank as follows: 1) The question of whether "salary" as used in 12 C.F.R. 2.4 includes an officer's base salary, bonuses, director's fees and/or any other compensation paid by the Bank must be determined by the Bank's management; 2) the question of whether the payment bonuses for credit life sales under 12 C.F.R. 2.4 is based on salary received by the recipient in a calendar year, a fiscal year, or any 12-month period must be determined by the Bank's management; and 3) pursuant to 12 C.F.R. 2.4, if the Bank's CEO is a loan officer and the CEO participates in the bonus plan under which payments based on credit life insurance sales are made, the CEO must be included in averaging the salaries of loan officers that participate in the Bank's bonus or incentive plan. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0740.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 741 National bank may acquire majority interest in company which operates call center facility which operates programs by which potential customers for new or used automobiles may access databases containing information on the used and new car inventories of numerous automobile dealerships in its metropolitan area. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0741.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0898. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.