# OCC Interpretive Letter No. 883: Letter approves national bank acquisition of non-controlling interest in limited liability company which will enter into contracts with federal, state, and local governments and agencies to provide a package of Internet-based services, including (1) developing Websites that facilitate electronic procurement transactions, (2) hosting these Websites, and (3) providing related merchant processing services

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0883

## Section

- **Citation:** OCC Interpretive Letter No. 883
- **Heading:** Letter approves national bank acquisition of non-controlling interest in limited liability company which will enter into contracts with federal, state, and local governments and agencies to provide a package of Internet-based services, including (1) developing Websites that facilitate electronic procurement transactions, (2) hosting these Websites, and (3) providing related merchant processing services
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** OCC Interpretive Letters / Letter approves national bank acquisition of non-controlling interest in limited liability company which will enter into contracts with federal, state, and local governments and agencies to provide a package of Internet-based services, including (1) developing Websites that facilitate electronic procurement transactions, (2) hosting these Websites, and (3) providing related merchant processing services.

## Text

Comptroller of the Currency
Administrator of National Banks
Washington, DC 20219
March 3, 2000
Interpretive Letter #883
April 2000
12 U.S.C. 24(7)
Dear [ ]:
This is in response to your letter of January 14, 2000, in which you notify the OCC of the intent of [
Bank, City, State ](“Bank”), to acquire a non-controlling interest in a
newly formed limited liability company. We conclude that, subject to the conditions discussed below, the
Bank may proceed with these acquisitions.
Bank’s Proposal
The Bank, an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of [ ] Corporation, engages primarily
in the issuance of consumer and business credit cards, including purchasing cards issued to federal, state,
and local government and agencies. The Bank also offers credit card processing and related merchant
services in connection with credit card transactions.
The Bank proposes to make a 50% non-controlling equity investment in a newly formed Delaware
limited liability company (“LLC”). The remaining interest in the LLC will be owned by [ ], Inc. (“
”), a [ State] corporation with its principal place of business in [ City, State]. [ ], a wholly-
owned subsidiary of the [ ], Inc., engages principally in the development of
Internet-based procurement systems for state and local governments.
The Bank and [ ] propose to establish the LLC as part of their overall strategy of providing
government credit card customers with the most convenient channels for accessing services and
products. The LLC will enter into contracts with federal, state, and local governments and agencies to
ges principally in the development of
Internet-based procurement systems for state and local governments.
The Bank and [ ] propose to establish the LLC as part of their overall strategy of providing
government credit card customers with the most convenient channels for accessing services and
products. The LLC will enter into contracts with federal, state, and local governments and agencies to

- 2 -
See e.g., Interpretive Letter No. 855, reprinted in [1998-1999 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L.
1
Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81-312 (Mar. 1, 1999).
Interpretive Letter from Julie L. Williams, First Senior Deputy Comptroller and Chief Counsel (Mar.
2
3, 2000) (finding bank may develop and host web sites for government agencies) (“Williams Letter”) (to be
provide a package of Internet-based services, which include (1) developing web sites that facilitate
electronic procurement transactions, (2) hosting these web sites, and (3) providing related merchant
processing services (collectively “Internet Services”). The Bank and [ ] have agreed to jointly
market the Internet Services to government agencies throughout the country.
Analysis
Your letter raises the issue of the authority of a national bank to make a non-controlling investment in a
limited liability company. The OCC has in a variety of circumstances concluded that it is lawful for a
national bank to own, indirectly through an operating subsidiary, a minority interest in an entity or
enterprise, such as a corporation, provided four criteria or standards are met. These standards, which
1
have been distilled from our previous decisions in the area of permissible non-controlling investments for
national banks and their subsidiaries, are:
(1) the activities of the entity or enterprise must be limited to activities that are part of, or
incidental to, the business of banking;
(2) the bank must be able to prevent the enterprise from engaging in activities which are
impermissible for national banks or be able to withdraw its investment;
e area of permissible non-controlling investments for
national banks and their subsidiaries, are:
(1) the activities of the entity or enterprise must be limited to activities that are part of, or
incidental to, the business of banking;
(2) the bank must be able to prevent the enterprise from engaging in activities which are
impermissible for national banks or be able to withdraw its investment;
(3) the bank's loss exposure must be limited, as a legal and accounting matter, and the bank
must not have open-ended liability for the obligations of the enterprise; and
(4) the investment must be convenient or useful to the bank in carrying out its business and
not a mere passive investment unrelated to that bank's banking business.
Each of these four factors is discussed below and applied to your application.
1. The activities of the enterprise in which the investment is made must be limited to activities
that are part of, or incidental to, the business of banking.
The OCC has found each of the activities included in the Internet Services to be part of, or incidental to,
the business of banking and, therefore, authorized for national banks under 12 U.S.C. § 24(Seventh).
We have previously determined that a national bank may provide a “package” of Internet-based services
which includes developing and hosting web sites for government agencies and providing related merchant
processing services.
2

- 3 -
published). See also Interpretive Letter No. 856, reprinted in [1998-1999 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L.
Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81-313 (Mar. 5, 1999); Corporate Decision No. 97-60 (July 1, 1997) (national bank operating
subsidiary maintaining and operating an Internet web site which provides information in pre-owned
automobiles to potential buyers); OCC Conditional Approval No
essing services.
2

- 3 -
published). See also Interpretive Letter No. 856, reprinted in [1998-1999 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L.
Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81-313 (Mar. 5, 1999); Corporate Decision No. 97-60 (July 1, 1997) (national bank operating
subsidiary maintaining and operating an Internet web site which provides information in pre-owned
automobiles to potential buyers); OCC Conditional Approval No. 221 (December 4, 1996) (national bank
making a minority investment in a company that provides an electronic “gateway” through which customers of
bank will be able to obtain home banking and other financial services from their respective financial institutions
through various electronic access devices).
Williams Letter, supra.
3
Conditional Approval No. 289 (October 2, 1998) (national banks may acquire a minority interest in a
4
firm that, among other things, provides accounts receivable processing and accounts payable processing);
Conditional Approval No. 248 (June 27, 1997) (national bank operating subsidiary may acquire a minority
interest in an entity that provides merchant credit and debit card processing services); Interpretive Letter No.
731, reprinted in [1995-1996 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81,048 (July 1, 1996) (national
banks as part of the banking business may collect and process accounts relating to an electronic toll collection
system).
Williams Letter, supra. See also Interpretive Letter No. 875 (Oct. 31, 1999) (to be published),
5
available at http://www.occ.treas.gov/interp/jan00/int875.pdf.
Williams Letter, supra. See also Richard W. Walker, Government Agencies Use EC Web
6
Technologies’ ecBuyer Electronic Commerce Software, Gov’t Computer News, September 20, 1999, p. 45;
Frank Tiboni, HCFA Updates Web Site, Gov’t Computer News, August 23, 1999, p. 6; J.B. Miles, A Variation
of Online-Auction Model Would Pay Off for Agencies, Gov’t Computer News, August 16, 1999, p. 46; J.B.
Miles, Online Malls Are Fast, Secure and Right at Your Desk, Gov’t Computer News, March 23, 1998, p
logies’ ecBuyer Electronic Commerce Software, Gov’t Computer News, September 20, 1999, p. 45;
Frank Tiboni, HCFA Updates Web Site, Gov’t Computer News, August 23, 1999, p. 6; J.B. Miles, A Variation
of Online-Auction Model Would Pay Off for Agencies, Gov’t Computer News, August 16, 1999, p. 46; J.B.
Miles, Online Malls Are Fast, Secure and Right at Your Desk, Gov’t Computer News, March 23, 1998, p. 79.
In the Williams Letter, we concluded that hosting web sites for government agencies and providing an
electronic communications pathway for product ordering and payment are finder activities authorized for
national banks. The provision of these services brings potential purchasers and suppliers together for a
transaction that they themselves negotiate and consummate. Accordingly, we conclude that the
components of the proposed Internet Services that involve hosting of web sites for government agencies
are permissible finder activities authorized for national banks pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 24(Seventh).
3
Moreover, the provision of related merchant processing services is also clearly part of the business of
banking.4
We have also approved the development of web sites for government agencies as incidental to other
Internet-based services where the ability to develop the web sites was critical to the successful marketing
of the package of services and the development was only a minor part of the entire Internet package
offered. Here, the development of web sites is needed to successfully market the Internet Services.
5
Other providers of similar Internet-based services for government agencies include web site development
in their package of services. Without the web development component, the LLC will be at a
6
competitive disadvantage relative to other providers of Internet commerce services to government
agencies. Additionally, the web site development feature is only a minor part of the entire package
offered by the LLC (on average gross profits from web site development will be less than 30% of the
velopment
in their package of services. Without the web development component, the LLC will be at a
6
competitive disadvantage relative to other providers of Internet commerce services to government
agencies. Additionally, the web site development feature is only a minor part of the entire package
offered by the LLC (on average gross profits from web site development will be less than 30% of the

- 4 -
Full function products provided as an incidental part of a package of banking services cannot
7
dominate the banking services being provided. See Interpretive Letter No. 737, reprinted in [1996-1997
Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81-101 (Aug. 19, 1996); Interpretive Letter No. 516, reprinted
in [1990-1991 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 83,220 (July 12, 1990); Letter from Michael J.
O’Keefe, District Counsel, Midwestern District (July 13, 1987) (unpublished); Interpretive Letter No. 345,
supra. The OCC has two alternative tests for determining when sale of full function products as part of a
package of banking services is sufficiently subordinate to those banking services. The older OCC test is
whether the cost of the full function product is less than 30% of the cost of the entire package. Interpretive
Letter No. 742, reprinted in [1996-1997 Transfer Binder ] Fed. Banking. L. Rep (CCH) ¶ 81-106 (Aug. 19,
1996). As an alternative to the cost test, a more recent letter adopted a test based on the percentage of “gross
profits” (sales less cost of goods sold) that is derived from the sale of the hardware. Interpretive Letter No.
754, reprinted in [1996-1997 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81-120 (Nov. 6, 1996).
Specifically, this letter held that where the gross profits generated by a full function product provided in
connection with a banking service do not exceed thirty percent of the total gross profits from that service, the
sale of the full function product is incidental to the permitted banking service
reprinted in [1996-1997 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81-120 (Nov. 6, 1996).
Specifically, this letter held that where the gross profits generated by a full function product provided in
connection with a banking service do not exceed thirty percent of the total gross profits from that service, the
sale of the full function product is incidental to the permitted banking service.
gross profits of the entire Internet Services package). Under these circumstances, we find the web site
7
development services to be incidental to the other Internet Services, and therefore authorized.
2. The bank must be able to prevent the enterprise from engaging in activities that do not
meet the foregoing standard, or be able to withdraw its investment.
This is an obvious corollary to the first standard. It is not sufficient that the enterprise’s activities are
permissible at the time of the Bank’s initial investment. They must also remain permissible for as long as
the Bank retains a membership interest in the enterprise. The Bank represents that the LLC’s
incorporating and operating agreements will include a limitation on the activities of the LLC. These
agreements will limit the activities in which the LLC may engage to those activities that are part of, or
incidental to, the business of banking. Moreover, the Bank represents that it will have an effective veto
over any activities that are not permissible for a national bank. Therefore, the second standard is
satisfied.
3. The bank's loss exposure must be limited, as a legal and accounting matter, and the bank
must not have open-ended liability for the obligations of the enterprise.
a. Loss exposure from a legal standpoint
A primary concern of the OCC is that national banks not be subjected to undue risk. Where an investing
bank will not control the operations of the entity in which the bank holds an interest, it is important that a
national bank's investment not expose it to unlimited liability
ust not have open-ended liability for the obligations of the enterprise.
a. Loss exposure from a legal standpoint
A primary concern of the OCC is that national banks not be subjected to undue risk. Where an investing
bank will not control the operations of the entity in which the bank holds an interest, it is important that a
national bank's investment not expose it to unlimited liability. As a legal matter, investors in a Delaware
limited liability company will not incur liability with respect to the liabilities or obligations of the limited
liability company solely by reason of being a member or manager of the limited liability company. Del.

- 5 -
OCC's Chief Accountant has concluded that the Bank's investment in the LLC should be recorded as
8
Investments in “unconsolidated subsidiaries and associated companies” on the Bank’s Consolidated Reports of
Condition and Income ("Call Reports"). Such classification is consistent with the Call Report Instructions.
See Instructions to Schedule RC- M, item 8.b.
Code Ann. Tit. 6 ' 18-303 (1993). Thus, the Bank's loss exposure for the liabilities of the LLC will be
limited by statute.
b. Loss exposure from an accounting standpoint
In assessing a bank's loss exposure as an accounting matter, the OCC has previously noted that the
appropriate accounting treatment for a bank's 20-50 percent ownership share of investment in a limited
liability company is to report it as an unconsolidated entity under the equity method of accounting. Under
this method, unless the bank has guaranteed any of the liabilities of the entity or has other financial
obligations to the entity, losses are generally limited to the amount of the investment, including loans and
other advances shown on the investor's books. See generally Accounting Principles Board, Op. 18 §
19 (1971) (equity method of accounting for investments in common stock).
As proposed, the Bank will have a non-controlling interest in the LLC
liabilities of the entity or has other financial
obligations to the entity, losses are generally limited to the amount of the investment, including loans and
other advances shown on the investor's books. See generally Accounting Principles Board, Op. 18 §
19 (1971) (equity method of accounting for investments in common stock).
As proposed, the Bank will have a non-controlling interest in the LLC. The Bank believes, and its
accountants have advised, that the appropriate accounting treatment for the Bank’s investment is the
equity method. Thus the Bank’s loss from an accounting perspective would be limited to the amount
8
invested in the LLC, and the Bank will not have any open-ended liability for the obligations of the LLC.
The Bank’s loss exposure is limited, as a legal and accounting matter. Therefore, the third standard is
satisfied.
4. The investment must be convenient or useful to the bank in carrying out its business and
not a mere passive investment unrelated to that bank's banking business.
A national bank's investment in an enterprise or entity that is not an operating subsidiary of the bank must
also satisfy the requirement that the investment have a beneficial connection to that bank's business, i.e., it
must be convenient or useful to the investing bank’s business activities and not constitute a mere passive
investment unrelated to the bank's banking business. Twelve U.S.C. § 24 gives national banks incidental
powers that are “necessary” to carry on the business of banking. “Necessary” has been judicially
construed to mean “convenient or useful.” Arnold Tours Inc. v. Camp, 472 F. 2d 427, 432 (1st Cir.
1972). Therefore, a consistent thread running through our precedents concerning stock ownership is that
it must be convenient or useful to the bank in conducting that bank's banking business. The investment
must benefit or facilitate that business and cannot be a mere passive or speculative investment.
This requirement is met in this case
Arnold Tours Inc. v. Camp, 472 F. 2d 427, 432 (1st Cir.
1972). Therefore, a consistent thread running through our precedents concerning stock ownership is that
it must be convenient or useful to the bank in conducting that bank's banking business. The investment
must benefit or facilitate that business and cannot be a mere passive or speculative investment.
This requirement is met in this case. The Bank’s investment in the LLC is an integral part of the Bank’s
merchant credit card strategy. By investing in the LLC, the Bank will be offering its government card
customers additional purchasing channels, thus improving the overall service capabilities of the Bank and
the attractiveness of the Bank’s government card and merchant processing products and services. In

- 6 -
addition, the Bank’s investment in the LLC will result in additional merchant processing income.
Therefore, the fourth standard is satisfied.
Conclusion
Based upon the information and representations you have provided, and for the reasons discussed
above, we conclude that the Bank may acquire and hold a non-controlling interest in the LLC in the
manner and as described herein, subject to the following conditions:
(1) The LLC will engage only in activities that are part of, or incidental to, the business of banking;
(2) The Bank will have veto power over any activities and major decisions of the LLC that are
inconsistent with condition number one, or will withdraw from the LLC in the event it engages in
an activity that is inconsistent with condition number one;
(3) The Bank will account for the investments in the LLC under the equity method of accounting;
and,
t of, or incidental to, the business of banking;
(2) The Bank will have veto power over any activities and major decisions of the LLC that are
inconsistent with condition number one, or will withdraw from the LLC in the event it engages in
an activity that is inconsistent with condition number one;
(3) The Bank will account for the investments in the LLC under the equity method of accounting;
and,
(4) The LLC will be subject to OCC supervision, regulation, and examination.
Please be advised that the conditions of this approval are deemed to be “conditions imposed in writing by
the agency in connection with the granting of any application or other request” within the meaning of 12
U.S.C. § 1818 and, as such, may be enforced in proceedings under applicable law.
This approval is granted based on a thorough review of all information available, including the
representations and commitments made in the application and by the Bank’s representatives.
If you have any questions, please contact Steven V. Key, Attorney, Bank Activities and Structure
Division, at (202) 874-5300.
Sincerely,
/s/
Julie L. Williams
First Senior Deputy Comptroller and Chief Counsel

## Nearby sections

- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 719 Letter concludes that an ESOP is a "company' for purposes of 12 U.S.C. 371c and that an ESOP that controls at least 25% of a bank's voting stock is an "affiliate" under sec. 371c (supersedes existing OCC interpretive letter #261). (10/26/89)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0719.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 720 Group of affiliate national banks may collectively own, through operating subsidiaries, minority interest in a merchant credit card processing subsidiary. (01/26/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0720.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 722 A national bank may invest CIF assets in mutual funds, including mutual funds that pay the bank a servicing fee, without the bank having to reduce its trustee fees, if the bank concludes, based upon a reasoned opinion of trust counsel, that such an arrangement is authorized by applicable state law, is consistent with the trust instrument, is appropriate for the particular trust accounts, and is consistent with OCC regulations, including in particular 12 C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12). (03/12/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0722.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 724 Bank can sell vehicle service contracts to customers who use home equity loan proceeds to purchase a vehicle, and the maturity of the service contract may be different from the maturity of the loan. (04/22/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0724.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 725 National bank to establish an operating subsidiary to engage in permissible derivatives-related activities. (05/10/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0725.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 726 Letter concerns the application of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations to financial institutions' support of microenterprise lending programs. (06/21/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0726.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 730 Letter concludes that loans proposed by the bank to an unaffiliated distributor of mutual funds would not be subject to interaffiliate lending restrictions contained in 12 U.S.C. 371C. (05/29/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0730.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 732 National bank may make a 5.5% investment in software company which is engaged in the design, development, marketing and maintenance of a network for electronic funds transfers and electronic data interchange, including transacting electronic commerce and marketing software products for use on its world-wide electronic commerce network. (05/10/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0732.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 733 National bank receiver is subject to the rights of secured creditors and creditors entitled to setoff. U.S. legal principles regarding enforcement of security interests are applicable to a receivership of a federal branch or agency conducted under National Bank Act. Therefore, receiver of an uninsured federal branch or agency does not have the right to interfere with the rights of secured creditors, including application of collateral held in U.S. to obligations of a non-U.S. office of the bank. (06/19/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0733.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 736 Lending limit exception for participations not limited to banks. Non-banks may act as participants. (07/25/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0736.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 737 Huntington National Bank's acquisition of minority interest in a limited liability company providing stored value systems. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0737.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 738 National bank's participation in a guaranty issued by an agent for a syndication of lenders with respect to their borrower's letter of credit reimbursement obligations to another bank or financial institution is permissible under I.R. 7.1016. (08/14/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0738.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 740 Letter advises the Bank as follows: 1) The question of whether "salary" as used in 12 C.F.R. 2.4 includes an officer's base salary, bonuses, director's fees and/or any other compensation paid by the Bank must be determined by the Bank's management; 2) the question of whether the payment bonuses for credit life sales under 12 C.F.R. 2.4 is based on salary received by the recipient in a calendar year, a fiscal year, or any 12-month period must be determined by the Bank's management; and 3) pursuant to 12 C.F.R. 2.4, if the Bank's CEO is a loan officer and the CEO participates in the bonus plan under which payments based on credit life insurance sales are made, the CEO must be included in averaging the salaries of loan officers that participate in the Bank's bonus or incentive plan. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0740.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 741 National bank may acquire majority interest in company which operates call center facility which operates programs by which potential customers for new or used automobiles may access databases containing information on the used and new car inventories of numerous automobile dealerships in its metropolitan area. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0741.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0883. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.