# OCC Interpretive Letter No. 843: Letter concludes that under described facts, ATM sharing space with a LPO and courier service is not a branch. (09/29/98)

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0843

## Section

- **Citation:** OCC Interpretive Letter No. 843
- **Heading:** Letter concludes that under described facts, ATM sharing space with a LPO and courier service is not a branch. (09/29/98)
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** OCC Interpretive Letters / Letter concludes that under described facts, ATM sharing space with a LPO and courier service is not a branch. (09/29/98)

## Text

Comptroller of the Currency
Administrator of National Banks
Southwestern District Office
Voice (214) 720 -7012
1600 Lincoln Plaza
Fax (214 720 - 7071
Dallas, TX 75201-3394
This letter supersedes our letter of February 11, 1998, sent in response to your inquiry of January 26, 1998. The
1
information contained in this letter is based on your inquiry and subsequent telephone conversations between you, others involved in this
proposal, and OCC staff.
12 U.S.C. § 36(j).
2
This phraseology has its origin in Securities Industry Association v. Clarke, 479 U.S. 388, 404 (1987) (Clarke) (holding that
3
the provision of discount brokerage services is not a core banking function and, thus, a bank office engaged in that activity is not a
branch).
Interpretive Letter #843
September 29, 1998
November 1998
12 U.S.C. 36J
Dear [ ]:
This responds to your inquiry regarding whether [ ] (the
bank), at its loan/deposit production office (LPO/DPO) in [ City, State ], may also provide
certain services without the LPO/DPO being considered to be a branch of the bank. The
1
services are: (1) the installation of an automated teller machine (ATM) for the payment of
withdrawals; (2) the sale of cashier’s checks, money orders and traveler’s checks; (3) provision
of safe deposit boxes; and (4) the cashing of checks. In addition, you ask whether the LPO/DPO
may share space with a facility operated by a courier service. For the reasons stated below, and
under the facts presented, we conclude that the LPO/DPO may provide the proposed services and
share space, as proposed, without being considered to be a branch of the bank.
I. Background
Title 12 U.S.C
ion
of safe deposit boxes; and (4) the cashing of checks. In addition, you ask whether the LPO/DPO
may share space with a facility operated by a courier service. For the reasons stated below, and
under the facts presented, we conclude that the LPO/DPO may provide the proposed services and
share space, as proposed, without being considered to be a branch of the bank.
I. Background
Title 12 U.S.C. § 36 permits national banks to establish branches under certain circumstances and
defines branches as facilities at which “deposits are received, or checks [are] paid, or money [is]
lent.” These activities are referred to as the “core banking functions.” The Comptroller of the
2

3
Currency has determined that national bank offices performing loan production and deposit
production functions are not branches provided that they do not engage in any of the core

12 U.S.C. §§ 7.1003--7.1005 (providing that loan production offices are not branches as long as bank funds representing loan
4
proceeds are not disbursed in-person to borrowers at the site); OCC Interpretive Letter No. 691, reprinted in [1995-96 Transfer Binder] Fed.
Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81-006 (Sept. 25, 1995) (deposit production offices are not branches where deposits are not accepted at the DPO
but rather are mailed by the customer to the bank after filling out preliminary paperwork at the DPO).
12 U.S.C. § 36(j).
5
12 C.F.R. § 7.3001.
6
12 C.F.R. § 7.1012.
7
Id. at § 7.1012(c).
8
[ ], President/CEO
September 29, 1998
Page 2
banking functions. Moreover, Congress in 1996, amended the national banking laws pertaining
4
to branching to provide that ATMs are not branches. In addition, we note that the OCC permits
5
national banks to share premises with other businesses, and to utilize courier services to transport
6
deposits between the customer and the bank
12(c).
8
[ ], President/CEO
September 29, 1998
Page 2
banking functions. Moreover, Congress in 1996, amended the national banking laws pertaining
4
to branching to provide that ATMs are not branches. In addition, we note that the OCC permits
5
national banks to share premises with other businesses, and to utilize courier services to transport
6
deposits between the customer and the bank. Whether these courier services are considered to
7
be bank branches depends on an evaluation of a variety of factors.8
For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that neither the activities listed above to be
undertaken by the bank, nor the space sharing arrangement, cause the LPO/DPO to be considered
to be a branch of the bank.
II. Discussion
A. Activities to be performed by the bank at the LPO/DPO
With the above statutory and regulatory framework in mind, the following discusses more
specifically the four activities that the bank seeks to perform at the site and their impact on
whether the site would be considered to be a branch of the bank.
First, you ask whether the presence of an ATM for the payment of withdrawals at the site would
cause the site to be considered to be a branch of the bank. As discussed, it is clear that ATMs are
no longer considered to be branches as a result of the 1996 changes to the definition of “branch”
as used in section 36. Moreover, as we understand the facts, the ATM would by physically
separate from the LPO/DPO and, while on the premises of the LPO/DPO, would be installed in
the outside wall so that it will be accessible from the street only, rather than from inside the office.
Further, withdrawals undertaken at the ATM will be accomplished by depositors, not by bank
personnel; in fact, withdrawals can be undertaken even when the LPO/DPO is closed. In addition,
the ATM will be available for use by customers of any bank which is a member of the networks to
which the ATM is linked, not just to customers of the bank
rom the street only, rather than from inside the office.
Further, withdrawals undertaken at the ATM will be accomplished by depositors, not by bank
personnel; in fact, withdrawals can be undertaken even when the LPO/DPO is closed. In addition,
the ATM will be available for use by customers of any bank which is a member of the networks to
which the ATM is linked, not just to customers of the bank. Under these circumstances, it is clear
that the presence of the ATM, in and of itself not a branch, does not convert the LPO/DPO, also
otherwise not a branch, into a branch.
Second, you ask about the sale of cashier’s checks, money orders and traveler’s checks. As we
understand the facts, these instruments would be available for sale to anyone who could pay for

We note that one could argue that the use of a credit card issued by the bank to purchase a check or money order or similar
9
instrument could be construed as the receipt of loan proceeds and, thus, the lending of money under sections 36(j) and 7.1003.
However, this issue does not arise in this case, because your bank does not issue credit cards. Moreover, even if it did, because the
bank would sell these instruments on similar terms and conditions without regard to the identity of the issuer of the credit card being
presented by the purchaser, this activity, too, would not be considered to be branching function. See OCC Interpretive Letter No. 814,
reprinted in [Current Binder], Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81-262 (November 3, 1997) (national bank subsidiary’s offices that, in fact,
disburse loan proceeds, on behalf of numerous other financial institutions, including banks and savings associations, on substantially
similar terms and conditions as applicable to loans made by parent bank are not branches because they are not facilities to attract bank
customers).
In fact, the Supreme Court has specifically recognized that the conduct of a safe deposit box business by a national bank is
10
not constrained by the section 36 branching limitations
ns, including banks and savings associations, on substantially
similar terms and conditions as applicable to loans made by parent bank are not branches because they are not facilities to attract bank
customers).
In fact, the Supreme Court has specifically recognized that the conduct of a safe deposit box business by a national bank is
10
not constrained by the section 36 branching limitations. See Clarke at p. 406.
E.g., Independent Bankers Association of America v. Smith, 534 F.2d 921, 944 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 862
11
(1976). This court noted that, in using the “shorthand phrase ‘checks paid,’ [Congress] envisioned all account withdrawals” and included
“those facilities that permit bank customers to perform the traditional banking function of withdrawing funds from their accounts.”
Under the facts presented, we have no need to consider whether the facility would be considered to be a branch if it also
12
cashed checks drawn on the bank itself , whether presented by a bank customer or not.
[ ], President/CEO
September 29, 1998
Page 3
them using cash or a credit card. Consequently, none of these activities can be construed as a
core banking function -- no deposits are being received, no funds are being withdrawn and no
money is being lent -- that would cause the facility to be considered to be a branch.
9
Third, you have asked about the provision of safe deposit boxes at the LPO/DPO. A safe deposit
box service is an activity in which a customer contracts with a bank to rent a safe deposit box for
the storage of valuables. The bank assumes responsibility to exercise reasonable care and to take
precautions against loss of the box’s contents. Any sums of money that may be placed in a safe
deposit box are not credited to the customer’s account at the bank
boxes at the LPO/DPO. A safe deposit
box service is an activity in which a customer contracts with a bank to rent a safe deposit box for
the storage of valuables. The bank assumes responsibility to exercise reasonable care and to take
precautions against loss of the box’s contents. Any sums of money that may be placed in a safe
deposit box are not credited to the customer’s account at the bank. Thus, providing a safe
deposit box service at the LPO/DPO is not “taking deposits” within the meaning of section 36(j)
and does not cause the facility to be considered to be a branch.10
Fourth, you ask whether the LPO/DPO can cash checks drawn on other banks without being
considered to be a branch of the bank. The term “checks paid,” within the meaning of the
definition of a “branch” refers to withdrawals from a deposit account at the bank. Thus,
11
cashing checks drawn on another bank is not an activity covered by the phrase “checks paid” in
the branching definition and this activity, conducted at the LPO/DPO, would not cause that
facility to be considered to be a branch of the bank.12
B. Operation of the courier service in space shared with the LPO/DPO
Your proposal also contemplates that an [ State ] courier service, [
], a subsidiary of [ Inc. ]
(together these companies are referred to in this letter as the courier service), a publicly traded
company that operates throughout the United States, will operate a pick-up point at the
LPO/DPO.
tate ] courier service, [
], a subsidiary of [ Inc. ]
(together these companies are referred to in this letter as the courier service), a publicly traded
company that operates throughout the United States, will operate a pick-up point at the
LPO/DPO.

In fact, in [ State ] alone, vehicles operated by and on behalf of the company make about 6,000 stops per day although
13
the number of locations served is less than that because pick-ups may occur more than once a day at certain sites.
In this regard, we note that the courier service assumes responsibility for items once they are dropped off at its pick-up
14
point and during transit.
These requirements pertain to conspicuous identification of the businesses, that the arrangement does not constitute a
15
joint venture or partnership, that the relationship between the entities is at arm’s length, that security issues are resolved, that the activities
of the other business do not adversely affect the safety and soundness of the bank, and that the assets and records of the parties are
segregated.
In addition to those requirements listed in footnote 15, requirements triggered by the sharing of employees are that these
16
employees fully disclose the nature of their relationship to the customers so that customers will know the identity of the bank or other
business that is providing the service and that the shared employees meet licensing or qualification requirements, if any, applicable to the
other business
se requirements listed in footnote 15, requirements triggered by the sharing of employees are that these
16
employees fully disclose the nature of their relationship to the customers so that customers will know the identity of the bank or other
business that is providing the service and that the shared employees meet licensing or qualification requirements, if any, applicable to the
other business.
[ ], President/CEO
September 29, 1998
Page 4
The bank has no ownership interest in the courier service which provides a scheduled and routed
delivery service for the pick-up and delivery of documents and other items to or on behalf of a
variety of businesses including banks, credit unions, thrifts, finance companies, other financial
institutions, pharmaceutical companies, medical laboratories and hospitals as well as universities,
military installations, Federal Reserve Bank branches and various governmental agencies. We
understand that the company in [ State ] serves most financial institutions in the state. The
company has about 65 employees in [ State ] and 8,000 nationwide. In [ State ] alone it
operates 33 vehicles and about 150 through owner-operator independent contractors. The pick-
up location operated at the LPO/DPO will constitute one of thousands of pick-up locations of the
courier service throughout [ State ] and numerous others nationwide.
13
Pick-ups at the [ City ] location are scheduled for 2 p.m. each business day and, following each
day’s pick-up, the courier service will not receive items at its [ City ] site for the remainder of
that day because it prefers that no items be left in the box overnight. The courier service will
14
include the [ City ] site in its list of service locations in the telephone book and in its
advertising. Moreover, the presence of the courier service’s pick-up location will be advertised
by signage in the window of the premises shared with the LPO/DPO
[ City ] site for the remainder of
that day because it prefers that no items be left in the box overnight. The courier service will
14
include the [ City ] site in its list of service locations in the telephone book and in its
advertising. Moreover, the presence of the courier service’s pick-up location will be advertised
by signage in the window of the premises shared with the LPO/DPO. The service will be
available for use by the general public and the courier service will deliver items dropped off at the
site to any destination in [ State ] and nationwide that it would normally serve. This could
include deposits being sent to the bank or to any other bank or other type of financial institution
as well as deliveries to recipients, other than financial institutions, of other items normally
transported by the courier service.
As stated, national banks are permitted to share space with other entities under 12 U.S.C. §
7.3001(a) subject to the requirements set forth in paragraph (c). The bank has represented that
15
these requirements will be satisfied. Moreover, section 7.3001 permits the sharing of employees
subject to certain requirements set forth in paragraph (c). In the arrangement proposed, a bank
16

As proposed, when a customer enters the facility, a bank employee will determine whether the customer intends to drop an
17
item off at the courier service’s pick up point. If the customer intends to do so and has not already signed a contract with the courier
service, the employee will provide a copy of the contract to the customer to sign. This is done irrespective of the identity of the intended
recipient of the item being dropped off. The customer then places the item in the slot at the pick up point. If the item is too big to fit into
the slot the employee instructs the customer to contact the courier service directly. In no event will the employee handle the item being
dropped off
copy of the contract to the customer to sign. This is done irrespective of the identity of the intended
recipient of the item being dropped off. The customer then places the item in the slot at the pick up point. If the item is too big to fit into
the slot the employee instructs the customer to contact the courier service directly. In no event will the employee handle the item being
dropped off. Items are placed in the slot only by the customer and are picked up only by the courier service’s pick up and delivery person.
The employee keeps a log of the items placed in the pick-up facility which is given to the courier service’s pick-up and delivery person
when he or she arrives to collect the contents of the box. With respect to deposits being transported by the courier service, included
among the contractual terms is a provision stating that items placed in the courier service’s box are not considered to be delivered to the
addressee until they are actually delivered to the addressee by the courier service and that the courier service is the agent of the
customer.
12 C.F.R. § 7.1012(c)(2)(ii)(A).
18
Id. at (c)(2)(ii)(B).
19
Id. at (c)(2)(ii)(C).
20
Id. at (c)(2)(ii)(D).
21
Id. at (c)(2)(ii)(E). In this regard, we note that the courier service will assume responsibility for maintaining adequate
22
insurance covering in-transit losses.
Id. at (c)(2)(ii)(F).
23
Id.
24
While, as described, a bank employee at the LPO/DPO will provide some minimal services when customers of the courier
25
service drop off items, sharing of employees, as noted, is permissible, and will be done in accordance with the applicable regulations
codified at 12 C.F.R. § 7.3001. Moreover, the fact that one of the courier service’s pick-up sites is occupied and utilized
[ ], President/CEO
September 29, 1998
Page 5
employee will provide limited services to the courier service. Consequently, the bank also has
17
agreed to comply with restrictions that pertain to the use of shared personnel
accordance with the applicable regulations
codified at 12 C.F.R. § 7.3001. Moreover, the fact that one of the courier service’s pick-up sites is occupied and utilized
[ ], President/CEO
September 29, 1998
Page 5
employee will provide limited services to the courier service. Consequently, the bank also has
17
agreed to comply with restrictions that pertain to the use of shared personnel.
We further note that the courier service clearly complies with the factors set forth in 12 U.S.C. §
7.1012(c)(2) which provides a safe harbor to determine when a courier service that transports
itemsfor deposit to a national bank should not be considered to be a branch of that bank. As
discussed above, the courier service makes its services available to the public including other
depository institutions, retains ultimate discretion to determine which customers and which
18
geographical areas it will serve, maintains ultimate responsibility for scheduling, movement, and
19
routing, does not operate under the name of the bank nor will the bank or the messenger service
20
advertise or represent that the service is provided by the bank, assumes responsibility for the
21
items once they are dropped off at its pick-up point and during transit, and acts as agent for the
22
customer. Moreover, when the courier service does transport items for deposit to the bank,
23
they are not credited to the customer’s account until they are received at the bank’s main office in
[ City ]. Finally, we note that the courier service provides its services through its own
24
employees and facilities in accordance with 12 C.F.R. § 7.1012(c)(2)(i).25
d acts as agent for the
22
customer. Moreover, when the courier service does transport items for deposit to the bank,
23
they are not credited to the customer’s account until they are received at the bank’s main office in
[ City ]. Finally, we note that the courier service provides its services through its own
24
employees and facilities in accordance with 12 C.F.R. § 7.1012(c)(2)(i).25

by the courier service pursuant to an arrangement with the bank does not require a different result on the branching issue. The factors
set forth in the safe harbor are for the purpose of evaluating whether a messenger service is “established” by a national bank and thus,
whether its facilities should be considered branches of a national bank. See 12 C.F.R. § 7.1012(c)(2); 58 Fed. Reg. 4070, 4071-72
(January 13, 1993) (preamble to final rule adopting current approach to determining whether a messenger service constitutes a branch of
a national bank). That one site out of numerous sites and vehicles utilized by the messenger service to make pick-ups throughout [ State
] and the United States is made available by a bank which is one of many financial institutions for which the messenger service transports
deposits from their customers cannot be said to require that the messenger be considered to be “established” by the bank and, thus, a
branch of the bank.
[ ], President/CEO
September 29, 1998
Page 6
III. Conclusion
Consequently, we conclude that an LPO/DPO of a national bank that provides the services
discussed above and which shares space with a pick-up site of a third party courier service, as
described, is not a branch of the national bank.
I hope that this has been responsive to your inquiry.
Sincerely yours,
/s/
Randall M. Ryskamp
District Counsel

## Nearby sections

- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 719 Letter concludes that an ESOP is a "company' for purposes of 12 U.S.C. 371c and that an ESOP that controls at least 25% of a bank's voting stock is an "affiliate" under sec. 371c (supersedes existing OCC interpretive letter #261). (10/26/89)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0719.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 720 Group of affiliate national banks may collectively own, through operating subsidiaries, minority interest in a merchant credit card processing subsidiary. (01/26/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0720.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 722 A national bank may invest CIF assets in mutual funds, including mutual funds that pay the bank a servicing fee, without the bank having to reduce its trustee fees, if the bank concludes, based upon a reasoned opinion of trust counsel, that such an arrangement is authorized by applicable state law, is consistent with the trust instrument, is appropriate for the particular trust accounts, and is consistent with OCC regulations, including in particular 12 C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12). (03/12/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0722.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 724 Bank can sell vehicle service contracts to customers who use home equity loan proceeds to purchase a vehicle, and the maturity of the service contract may be different from the maturity of the loan. (04/22/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0724.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 725 National bank to establish an operating subsidiary to engage in permissible derivatives-related activities. (05/10/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0725.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 726 Letter concerns the application of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations to financial institutions' support of microenterprise lending programs. (06/21/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0726.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 730 Letter concludes that loans proposed by the bank to an unaffiliated distributor of mutual funds would not be subject to interaffiliate lending restrictions contained in 12 U.S.C. 371C. (05/29/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0730.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 732 National bank may make a 5.5% investment in software company which is engaged in the design, development, marketing and maintenance of a network for electronic funds transfers and electronic data interchange, including transacting electronic commerce and marketing software products for use on its world-wide electronic commerce network. (05/10/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0732.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 733 National bank receiver is subject to the rights of secured creditors and creditors entitled to setoff. U.S. legal principles regarding enforcement of security interests are applicable to a receivership of a federal branch or agency conducted under National Bank Act. Therefore, receiver of an uninsured federal branch or agency does not have the right to interfere with the rights of secured creditors, including application of collateral held in U.S. to obligations of a non-U.S. office of the bank. (06/19/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0733.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 736 Lending limit exception for participations not limited to banks. Non-banks may act as participants. (07/25/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0736.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 737 Huntington National Bank's acquisition of minority interest in a limited liability company providing stored value systems. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0737.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 738 National bank's participation in a guaranty issued by an agent for a syndication of lenders with respect to their borrower's letter of credit reimbursement obligations to another bank or financial institution is permissible under I.R. 7.1016. (08/14/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0738.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 740 Letter advises the Bank as follows: 1) The question of whether "salary" as used in 12 C.F.R. 2.4 includes an officer's base salary, bonuses, director's fees and/or any other compensation paid by the Bank must be determined by the Bank's management; 2) the question of whether the payment bonuses for credit life sales under 12 C.F.R. 2.4 is based on salary received by the recipient in a calendar year, a fiscal year, or any 12-month period must be determined by the Bank's management; and 3) pursuant to 12 C.F.R. 2.4, if the Bank's CEO is a loan officer and the CEO participates in the bonus plan under which payments based on credit life insurance sales are made, the CEO must be included in averaging the salaries of loan officers that participate in the Bank's bonus or incentive plan. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0740.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 741 National bank may acquire majority interest in company which operates call center facility which operates programs by which potential customers for new or used automobiles may access databases containing information on the used and new car inventories of numerous automobile dealerships in its metropolitan area. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0741.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0843. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.