# OCC Interpretive Letter No. 815: Letter permits a nationally-chartered trust company to retain a 15% interest in an Indiana state-chartered trust company. (12/02/97)

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0815

## Section

- **Citation:** OCC Interpretive Letter No. 815
- **Heading:** Letter permits a nationally-chartered trust company to retain a 15% interest in an Indiana state-chartered trust company. (12/02/97)
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** OCC Interpretive Letters / Letter permits a nationally-chartered trust company to retain a 15% interest in an Indiana state-chartered trust company. (12/02/97)

## Text

Comptroller of the Currency
Administrator of National Banks
Central District Office
One Financial Place, Suite 2700
440 South LaSalle Street
Chicago, Illinois 60605
December 2, 1997
Interpretive Letter #815
January 1998
12 U.S.C. 24(7)68
12 U.S.C. 24(7)81
Dear [ ],
This responds to your letter of September 3, 1997, requesting confirmation that the [
] (“Bank”), [ City, State ], may
lawfully retain its minority, noncontrolling interest in [
] (“TC”), [ City, State ], a state-chartered trust company.
Based on the information and representations provided and for the reasons set forth below, I
agree with your conclusion that [ Bank ] may retain its interest in [ TC ].
I.
BACKGROUND
[ Bank ], a nationally-chartered trust company and wholly-owned subsidiary of [ ]
Corporation, a holding company, currently manages over $1.4 billion in assets in more than 1,500
accounts. On September 16, 1997, [ Bank ] acquired a 15% interest in [ TC ], a trust
company chartered under the laws of Indiana. [ TC ] was owned by three shareholders prior to
[ Bank ]’s purchase. Two of the shareholders, [ Mr. 1 ] and [ Mr. 2 ], are also
in key management positions. The third shareholder is not active in the operation of [ TC ]. [ TC ]
currently has approximately $250 million in assets under management in more that 600 accounts.
mpany chartered under the laws of Indiana. [ TC ] was owned by three shareholders prior to
[ Bank ]’s purchase. Two of the shareholders, [ Mr. 1 ] and [ Mr. 2 ], are also
in key management positions. The third shareholder is not active in the operation of [ TC ]. [ TC ]
currently has approximately $250 million in assets under management in more that 600 accounts.

- 2 -
Pursuant to a Stock Acquisition Agreement entered into between [ Bank ], [ ] Corporation,
[ TC ] and the [ TC ] shareholders, [ Bank ] purchased newly-issued common stock of [ TC ]
equal to a 15% interest in [ TC ]. As of the closing on the purchase of these shares, a
Shareholders’ Agreement was entered into governing the operation of [ TC ], establishing three
positions on [ TC ]’s seven-person Board of Directors as [ Bank ]-appointed directors and
establishing voting provisions at the shareholder and director level which provide [ Bank ] with
veto power over major transaction or management decisions relating to [ TC ].
The Acquisition Agreement further states that [ Bank ] will ultimately acquire the remainder of
[ TC ] in a single transaction. Closing on the acquisition of [ TC ]’s remaining shares is
anticipated to occur by June 30, 2002. Between June 30, 2000, and June 30, 2002, there will be a
revenue valuation confirmation period during which the two organizations will work together for
[ Bank ]’s purchase of [ TC ]’s remaining shares. Prior to its closing on those remaining
shares, [ Bank ] will notify and seek approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
for its acquisition of [ TC ] through a merger pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 215a.
The Acquisition Agreement also provides for various contingencies during the nearly five-year
period from the initial purchase of the newly issued shares in September 1997 through the closing
on the remaining shares in 2002
s, [ Bank ] will notify and seek approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
for its acquisition of [ TC ] through a merger pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 215a.
The Acquisition Agreement also provides for various contingencies during the nearly five-year
period from the initial purchase of the newly issued shares in September 1997 through the closing
on the remaining shares in 2002. If any adverse change occurs with respect to [ TC ],
[ Bank ] would be relieved of any obligation to acquire the remaining shares and would be
entitled to have the newly-issued shares repurchased by the [ TC ] shareholders. Adverse changes
include a material adverse change in the financial condition of [ TC ]; a material adverse change in
the customer base of [ TC ]; the conviction of any Shareholder of a felony; a revocation,
withdrawal, suspension or termination by banking regulators or other governmental authorities of
[ TC ]’s authority to conduct operations in the ordinary course of business; or the death and/or
disability of [ TC ]’s two key officers prior to June 30, 2000, or within twelve months of each
other.
II.
ANALYSIS
[ Bank ]’s purchase of a 15% interest in [ TC ] initially raises the issue of the authority of a
nationally-chartered trust company to hold a minority, noncontrolling interest in a corporation. In
a variety of circumstances the OCC has permitted national banks to own, either directly, or
indirectly through an operating subsidiary, a minority interest in an enterprise. In several recent
interpretive letters, the OCC concluded that national banks are legally permitted to make a
minority, noncontrolling investment in an entity provided that four standards are satisfied. See
Comptroller Interpretive Letters No. 737 (August 19, 1996), reprinted in [1996-1997 Transfer
Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81,101; No. 732 (May 10, 1996), reprinted in [1995-1996
Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81,049; No
ncluded that national banks are legally permitted to make a
minority, noncontrolling investment in an entity provided that four standards are satisfied. See
Comptroller Interpretive Letters No. 737 (August 19, 1996), reprinted in [1996-1997 Transfer
Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81,101; No. 732 (May 10, 1996), reprinted in [1995-1996
Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81,049; No. 694 (December 13, 1995), reprinted
in [1995-1996 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81,009; and No. 692 (November
1, 1995), reprinted in [1995-1996 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81,007. These
standards, which have been distilled from our previous decisions in the area of permissible
minority, noncontrolling investments for national banks and their subsidiaries, are:

- 3 -
(1) the activities of the enterprise in which the bank invests must be limited to activities that are
part of, or incidental to, the business of banking;
(2) the bank must be able to prevent the enterprise from engaging in activities that do not meet
the foregoing standard, or be able to withdraw its investment;
(3) the bank’s loss exposure must be limited, as a legal and accounting matter, and the bank must
not have open-ended liability for the obligations of the enterprise; and
(4) the investment must be convenient or useful to the bank in carrying out its business and not a
mere passive investment unrelated to that bank’s banking business.
Each of these standards is discussed below and applied to [ Bank ]’s investment.
1.
The activities of the enterprise in which the bank invests must be limited to
activities that are part of, or incidental to, the business of banking.
Our precedents on minority, noncontrolling stock ownership have recognized that the enterprise
in which the bank takes an equity interest must confine its activities to those that are part of, or
incidental to, the conduct of the banking business. See, e.g., Comptroller Interpretive Letter No
bank invests must be limited to
activities that are part of, or incidental to, the business of banking.
Our precedents on minority, noncontrolling stock ownership have recognized that the enterprise
in which the bank takes an equity interest must confine its activities to those that are part of, or
incidental to, the conduct of the banking business. See, e.g., Comptroller Interpretive Letter No.
380 (December 29, 1986), reprinted in [1988-1989 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH)
¶ 85,604 n.8 (since a national bank can provide options clearing services to customers, it can
purchase stock in a corporation providing options clearing services); Letter from Robert B.
Serino, Deputy Chief Counsel (Nov. 9, 1992) (since the operation of an ATM network is “a
fundamental part of the basic business of banking,” an equity investment in a corporation
operating such a network is permissible).
You have represented that [ TC ] provides trust and fiduciary services, including the normal
and customary services associated with administering trusts and estates, managing agency
accounts, providing custodial and safekeeping services, serving in various fiduciary capacities, and
providing pension and employee benefit services. It is well established that national banks may
engage in trust activities. 12 U.S.C. § 92a.
Thus, the activities performed by [ TC ] are activities that are part of, or incidental to, the
business of banking, and the first standard is satisfied.
2.
The bank must be able to prevent the enterprise from engaging in activities that
do not meet the foregoing standard, or be able to withdraw its investment.
The activities of the enterprise in which a national bank may invest must be part of, or incidental
to, the business of banking not only at the time the bank first acquires its ownership, but for as
long as the bank has an ownership interest. This standard may be met if the bank is able to
exercise a veto power over the activities of the enterprise, or is able to dispose of its interest
vestment.
The activities of the enterprise in which a national bank may invest must be part of, or incidental
to, the business of banking not only at the time the bank first acquires its ownership, but for as
long as the bank has an ownership interest. This standard may be met if the bank is able to
exercise a veto power over the activities of the enterprise, or is able to dispose of its interest. See,

- 4 -
Although the Shareholders’ Agreement does not provide for [ Bank ]’s withdrawal from
1
its investment if [ TC ] engages in activities that are not part of, or incidental to, the business of
banking, the Agreement does require the unanimous vote of the Shareholders to amend [ TC ]’s
Articles of Incorporation. Since [ TC ]’s articles of incorporation will provide that it will not
engage in activities that are not part of, or incidental to, the business of banking, [ Bank ] will be
able to enforce such provision.
e.g., Interpretive Letter No. 711 (February 3, 1996), reprinted in [1995-1996 Transfer Binder]
Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 81-026; Interpretive Letter No. 625 (July 1, 1993), reprinted in
[1993-1994 Transfer Binder] Fed. Banking L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 83,507. This ensures that the bank
will not become involved in activities which are not part of, or incidental to, the business of
banking.
A number of provisions governing the relationship between [ Bank ] and [ TC ] will cause [ TC ]
to restrict its activities to those that are part of, or incidental to, the business of banking. First,
[ TC ]’s articles of incorporation will be amended to limit its activities to those that are part of, or
incidental to, the business of banking. Second, the Acquisition Agreement provides for [ Bank ]
to be relieved of any obligation to acquire the remaining shares and entitles it to have the newly-
issued shares repurchased by the [ TC ] shareholders in the event of an adverse or material change
in [TC ]
icles of incorporation will be amended to limit its activities to those that are part of, or
incidental to, the business of banking. Second, the Acquisition Agreement provides for [ Bank ]
to be relieved of any obligation to acquire the remaining shares and entitles it to have the newly-
issued shares repurchased by the [ TC ] shareholders in the event of an adverse or material change
in [TC ]. Third, the Shareholders’ Agreement provides for the Board of Directors of [TC] to have
seven (7) members, including the three (3) [ TC ] shareholders, one (1) individual chosen by those
three shareholders, and three (3) additional directors to be chosen by [ Bank ]. The Shareholders’
Agreement further provides that the affirmative vote of 80% of [ TC ]’s Board of Directors is
required for major decisions and transactions, including adding a new line of business or making
any changes in the scope or nature of the business of [ TC ]. Thus, [Bank] has the veto power to
1
prevent [ TC ] from engaging in any activities that are not part of, or incidental to, the business of
banking.
Through the revised articles of incorporation, Acquisition Agreement, and the [ Bank ]-
designated positions on the [ TC ] Board of Directors, [ Bank ] can assure that [ TC ] does not
engage in activities that are not a part of, or incidental to, the business of banking. Therefore, the
second standard is satisfied.
3. The bank’s loss exposure must be limited, as a legal and accounting matter, and the bank
must not have open-ended liability for the obligations of the enterprise.
a.
Loss exposure from a legal standpoint
A primary concern of the OCC is that national banks should not be subjected to undue risk.
Where an investing bank will not control the operations of the entity in which the bank holds an
interest, it is important that the national bank’s investment not expose it to unlimited liability. In
t have open-ended liability for the obligations of the enterprise.
a.
Loss exposure from a legal standpoint
A primary concern of the OCC is that national banks should not be subjected to undue risk.
Where an investing bank will not control the operations of the entity in which the bank holds an
interest, it is important that the national bank’s investment not expose it to unlimited liability. In

- 5 -
Ind. Code Ch. 28-1-5-1(a)(1993).
2
Indiana, trust companies are defined as “corporations,” and, as a legal matter, “a shareholder of a
2
corporation is not personally liable for the acts or debts of the corporation.” Ind. Code Ch. 23-1-
26-3(b) (1993). See also Aronson v. Price, 644 N.E.2d 864, 867 (Ind. 1994) (“corporate
shareholders sustain liability for corporate acts only to the extent of their investment”). Thus, [
Bank ]’s loss exposure for the liabilities of [ TC ] is limited by statute.
b.
Loss exposure from an accounting standpoint
In assessing a bank’s loss exposure as an accounting matter, the OCC has previously noted that
the appropriate accounting treatment for a minority investment is to report it as an unconsolidated
entity under the equity method of accounting. Under this method, unless the bank has guaranteed
any of the liabilities of the entity or has other financial obligations to the entity, losses are
generally limited to the amount of the investment, including loans and other advances shown on
the investor’s books. See generally, Accounting Principles Board, Op. 18 § 19 (1971) (equity
method of accounting for investments in common stock). Interpretive Letter No. 692, supra.
[ Bank ] has a 15 percent ownership interest in [ TC ], and will account for its investment under
the equity method. [ Bank ]’s loss exposure is initially limited to the amount of its investment and
is subject to certain rights to have its shares repurchased upon the occurrence of adverse changes
in circumstances
f accounting for investments in common stock). Interpretive Letter No. 692, supra.
[ Bank ] has a 15 percent ownership interest in [ TC ], and will account for its investment under
the equity method. [ Bank ]’s loss exposure is initially limited to the amount of its investment and
is subject to certain rights to have its shares repurchased upon the occurrence of adverse changes
in circumstances. Further, [ Bank ]’s obligation to proceed with the purchase of the remaining
shares is conditioned upon [ TC ]’s continued financial and operational performance.
Therefore, for both legal and accounting purposes, [ Bank ]’s potential loss exposure relative to
[ TC ] should be limited to the amount of its investment. Since that exposure is quantifiable and
controllable, the third standard is satisfied.
4. The investment must be convenient or useful to the bank in carrying out its business and not a
mere passive investment unrelated to that bank’s banking business.
Twelve U.S.C.§ 24(Seventh) gives national banks incidental powers that are “necessary” to carry
on the business of banking. “Necessary” has been judicially construed to mean “convenient or
useful.” See Arnold Tours, Inc. v. Camp, 472 F.2d 427, 432 (1st Cir. 1972). Our precedents on
bank non-controlling investments have indicated that the investment must be convenient or useful
to the bank in conducting that bank’s business. The investment must benefit or facilitate that
business and cannot be a mere passive or speculative investment. See, e.g. OCC Conditional
Approval No. 186 (Nov. 15, 1995) (National bank may indirectly own a 25 percent interest in a
trust company.)
From your statements, it appears that [ Bank ] has valid business reasons for its investment in
[ TC ]. You state that this investment allows [ Bank ] to extend its trust business into a new
market through [ TC ], an established trust provider. For this reason, [ Bank ]’s investment
186 (Nov. 15, 1995) (National bank may indirectly own a 25 percent interest in a
trust company.)
From your statements, it appears that [ Bank ] has valid business reasons for its investment in
[ TC ]. You state that this investment allows [ Bank ] to extend its trust business into a new
market through [ TC ], an established trust provider. For this reason, [ Bank ]’s investment

- 6 -
benefits and furthers its banking business by enabling [ Bank ] to gain new trust customers
through [ TC ]. In addition, [ Bank ]’s investment is intended to provide a vehicle for the
orderly acquisition of [ TC ]. Thus, it is not merely a passive or speculative investment.
Accordingly, the fourth standard is satisfied.
III.
CONCLUSION
This opinion is based on a thorough review of all information available, including representations
and commitments submitted by [ Bank ], and by its representatives. Based on these
representations and for the reasons outlined above, we conclude that the Bank may legally retain
its investment in [ TC ], subject to the following conditions:
1.
[ TC ] will engage only in activities that are part of, or incidental to, the business of
banking;
2.
[ Bank ] will have veto power over any activities and major decisions of [ TC ]
that are inconsistent with condition number one, or will withdraw from [TC] in the
event that it engages in an activity that is inconsistent with condition number one;
3.
[ Bank ] will account for its investment in [ TC ] under the equity method of
accounting; and
4.
[ TC ] will be subject to OCC supervision, regulation, and examination.
These conditions are conditions imposed in writing by the OCC in connection with its action on
the request for a legal opinion confirming that [ Bank ]’s investment is permissible under 12
U.S.C. § 24 (Seventh) and, as such, may be enforced in proceedings under applicable law.
If you have any questions, please contact me or Giovanna Cavallo, Attorney, at (312) 360-8805
lation, and examination.
These conditions are conditions imposed in writing by the OCC in connection with its action on
the request for a legal opinion confirming that [ Bank ]’s investment is permissible under 12
U.S.C. § 24 (Seventh) and, as such, may be enforced in proceedings under applicable law.
If you have any questions, please contact me or Giovanna Cavallo, Attorney, at (312) 360-8805.
Sincerely,
/s/
Coreen S. Arnold
District Counsel

## Nearby sections

- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 719 Letter concludes that an ESOP is a "company' for purposes of 12 U.S.C. 371c and that an ESOP that controls at least 25% of a bank's voting stock is an "affiliate" under sec. 371c (supersedes existing OCC interpretive letter #261). (10/26/89)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0719.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 720 Group of affiliate national banks may collectively own, through operating subsidiaries, minority interest in a merchant credit card processing subsidiary. (01/26/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0720.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 722 A national bank may invest CIF assets in mutual funds, including mutual funds that pay the bank a servicing fee, without the bank having to reduce its trustee fees, if the bank concludes, based upon a reasoned opinion of trust counsel, that such an arrangement is authorized by applicable state law, is consistent with the trust instrument, is appropriate for the particular trust accounts, and is consistent with OCC regulations, including in particular 12 C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12). (03/12/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0722.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 724 Bank can sell vehicle service contracts to customers who use home equity loan proceeds to purchase a vehicle, and the maturity of the service contract may be different from the maturity of the loan. (04/22/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0724.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 725 National bank to establish an operating subsidiary to engage in permissible derivatives-related activities. (05/10/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0725.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 726 Letter concerns the application of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations to financial institutions' support of microenterprise lending programs. (06/21/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0726.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 730 Letter concludes that loans proposed by the bank to an unaffiliated distributor of mutual funds would not be subject to interaffiliate lending restrictions contained in 12 U.S.C. 371C. (05/29/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0730.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 732 National bank may make a 5.5% investment in software company which is engaged in the design, development, marketing and maintenance of a network for electronic funds transfers and electronic data interchange, including transacting electronic commerce and marketing software products for use on its world-wide electronic commerce network. (05/10/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0732.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 733 National bank receiver is subject to the rights of secured creditors and creditors entitled to setoff. U.S. legal principles regarding enforcement of security interests are applicable to a receivership of a federal branch or agency conducted under National Bank Act. Therefore, receiver of an uninsured federal branch or agency does not have the right to interfere with the rights of secured creditors, including application of collateral held in U.S. to obligations of a non-U.S. office of the bank. (06/19/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0733.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 736 Lending limit exception for participations not limited to banks. Non-banks may act as participants. (07/25/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0736.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 737 Huntington National Bank's acquisition of minority interest in a limited liability company providing stored value systems. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0737.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 738 National bank's participation in a guaranty issued by an agent for a syndication of lenders with respect to their borrower's letter of credit reimbursement obligations to another bank or financial institution is permissible under I.R. 7.1016. (08/14/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0738.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 740 Letter advises the Bank as follows: 1) The question of whether "salary" as used in 12 C.F.R. 2.4 includes an officer's base salary, bonuses, director's fees and/or any other compensation paid by the Bank must be determined by the Bank's management; 2) the question of whether the payment bonuses for credit life sales under 12 C.F.R. 2.4 is based on salary received by the recipient in a calendar year, a fiscal year, or any 12-month period must be determined by the Bank's management; and 3) pursuant to 12 C.F.R. 2.4, if the Bank's CEO is a loan officer and the CEO participates in the bonus plan under which payments based on credit life insurance sales are made, the CEO must be included in averaging the salaries of loan officers that participate in the Bank's bonus or incentive plan. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0740.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 741 National bank may acquire majority interest in company which operates call center facility which operates programs by which potential customers for new or used automobiles may access databases containing information on the used and new car inventories of numerous automobile dealerships in its metropolitan area. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0741.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0815. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.