# OCC Interpretive Letter No. 722: A national bank may invest CIF assets in mutual funds, including mutual funds that pay the bank a servicing fee, without the bank having to reduce its trustee fees, if the bank concludes, based upon a reasoned opinion of trust counsel, that such an arrangement is authorized by applicable state law, is consistent with the trust instrument, is appropriate for the particular trust accounts, and is consistent with OCC regulations, including in particular 12 C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12). (03/12/96)

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0722

## Section

- **Citation:** OCC Interpretive Letter No. 722
- **Heading:** A national bank may invest CIF assets in mutual funds, including mutual funds that pay the bank a servicing fee, without the bank having to reduce its trustee fees, if the bank concludes, based upon a reasoned opinion of trust counsel, that such an arrangement is authorized by applicable state law, is consistent with the trust instrument, is appropriate for the particular trust accounts, and is consistent with OCC regulations, including in particular 12 C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12). (03/12/96)
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** OCC Interpretive Letters / A national bank may invest CIF assets in mutual funds, including mutual funds that pay the bank a servicing fee, without the bank having to reduce its trustee fees, if the bank concludes, based upon a reasoned opinion of trust counsel, that such an arrangement is authorized by applicable state law, is consistent with the trust instrument, is appropriate for the particular trust accounts, and is consistent with OCC regulations, including in particular 12 C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12). (03/12/96)

## Text

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Interpretations - Letter 722
Published in Interpretations and Actions May 1996
Cites:
G 12 C.F.R. 9.18
March 12, 1996
[ ]
Dear [ ]:
This responds to your February 22, 1996 letter requesting, on behalf of [ ] that the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC") confirm its position on a national bank's ability to invest collective
investment fund ("CIF") assets in mutual funds and to receive trustee fees notwithstanding the fees a
mutual fund also charges participants or any corresponding mutual fund fee the bank may receive as a
mutual fund servicer. We believe a national bank may invest CIF assets in mutual funds, including
mutual funds that pay the bank servicing fees, without the bank having to reduce its trustee fees, if the
bank in question concludes, based upon a reasoned opinion of trust counsel, that such an arrangement is
authorized by applicable state law, is consistent with the trust instrument, is appropriate for the particular
trust accounts, and is consistent with OCC regulations, including in particular, 12 C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12).
State law and the trust instrument govern the types of investments a national bank trustee may make. 12
C.F.R. 9.11(a). Not only must banks invest trust
assets in permissible types of investments, but the particular investment chosen from among the
authorized types also must be appropriate. A particular investment is appropriate if it is consistent with
the trust instrument's requirements or the state law's "prudent investor" standards and with the bank's
other fiduciary duties
ument or court order. Id. at 66174. > Not only must banks invest trust
assets in permissible types of investments, but the particular investment chosen from among the
authorized types also must be appropriate. A particular investment is appropriate if it is consistent with
the trust instrument's requirements or the state law's "prudent investor" standards and with the bank's
other fiduciary duties.
Investing trust assets in mutual funds that compensate a national bank trustee for advisory or other
services creates a conflict of interest under 12 C.F.R. 9.12(a). See Comptroller's Handbook for Fiduciary
Activities, Fiduciary Precedent 9.2105, p. 225. A conflict of interest arises when a bank trustee makes an
investment that might lead the bank to disregard or ignore the trust beneficiaries' best interest. Under
Section 9.12(a), a national bank may invest trust assets in proprietary mutual funds and receive
compensation from the mutual funds to the extent authorized under state law, the trust instrument, or
court order.
Most states have enacted statutes identifying both proprietary and nonproprietary mutual funds as
permissible investments for trust assets. If appropriate, mutual fund investments offer certain advantages
for trust accounts, such as enhanced investment diversification, economies of scale, and public
Interpretations - Letter 722
(1 of 3)
orized under state law, the trust instrument, or
court order.
Most states have enacted statutes identifying both proprietary and nonproprietary mutual funds as
permissible investments for trust assets. If appropriate, mutual fund investments offer certain advantages
for trust accounts, such as enhanced investment diversification, economies of scale, and public
Interpretations - Letter 722
(1 of 3)

information on values and returns.
Because investing CIF assets in mutual funds can result in CIF participants having to pay additional fees,
a national bank must consider the fees it and the mutual fund receive when determining whether a
particular mutual fund investment is appropriate. A mutual fund ultimately charges its shareholders,
including any CIF participant investors, for investment management, administrative, brokerage, transfer
agent, custodial, or other services that the mutual fund's service providers perform.
While such fees do not make mutual fund investments per se inappropriate for CIFs, the bank's overall
fees, when considered with the mutual funds' fees, must comply with any state law requirement that fees
be reasonable, necessary, or appropriate, and the disclosure of the fee arrangement must
conform to any relevant state law requirements. Absent state law, trust instrument, or other party
agreement regulating or defining appropriate fiduciary compensation, OCC regulation requires that fees
paid to a national bank fiduciary must be reasonable. 12 C.F.R. 9.15
The reasonableness of a fee, and the prudence of the investment creating additional fees, depends in part
upon the services obtained for the fee. The Restatement of the Law (Third) of Trusts discusses the dual
compensation problem that can arise when fiduciaries invest trust assets in mutual funds
CC regulation requires that fees
paid to a national bank fiduciary must be reasonable. 12 C.F.R. 9.15
The reasonableness of a fee, and the prudence of the investment creating additional fees, depends in part
upon the services obtained for the fee. The Restatement of the Law (Third) of Trusts discusses the dual
compensation problem that can arise when fiduciaries invest trust assets in mutual funds. According to
the Restatement,
Even assuming fiduciary care in comparing costs and avoiding excessive charges, fund managers
inevitably must be compensated in one way or another. If the trustee also receives commissions
from the trust, they must be appropriate to the duties performed; and overall management costs to
the trust estate must not be unreasonable in light of alternatives realistically available to the
particular trustee.
Restatement of the Law (Third) of Trusts, 227, comment m (1992).
In addition to these considerations applicable to all types of fees, OCC regulations also specifically limit
the management fee a national bank can charge its CIF participants. According to the relevant portion of
OCC regulation 12 C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12), a national bank
may charge a fee for the management of the collective investment fund: Provided, That the
fractional part of such fee proportionate to the interest of each participant shall not, when added to
any other compensations charged by a bank to a participant, exceed the total amount of
compensations which would have been charged to said participant if no assets of said participant
had been invested in participations in the fund.
This management fee restriction is meant to prevent "double charging" and potential conflicts of interest
where the fiduciary possesses investment discretion. 55 Fed. Reg. 4184, 4192 (1990). A national bank's
management fees for CIFs invested in mutual funds must comply with the fee restrictions contained in 12
C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12)
of said participant
had been invested in participations in the fund.
This management fee restriction is meant to prevent "double charging" and potential conflicts of interest
where the fiduciary possesses investment discretion. 55 Fed. Reg. 4184, 4192 (1990). A national bank's
management fees for CIFs invested in mutual funds must comply with the fee restrictions contained in 12
C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12).
Banks that invest CIF assets in proprietary and nonproprietary mutual funds must perform investment
and compensation analysis to ensure that the investment and the attendant fees are appropriate. In our
opinion, a national bank may invest CIF assets in mutual funds and receive fees for servicing the mutual
fund without reducing its trustee fees provided that the bank concludes, on the basis of the particular
facts presented, and supported by a reasoned opinion of trust counsel, that applicable state law, the
governing trust instrument, and OCC regulation 12 C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12) permit such arrangements. A
Interpretations - Letter 722
(2 of 3)

national bank must also determine that the investment is prudent and appropriate for the trust accounts,
given the investment alternatives realistically available to the trustee, and trust counsel should also
address whether the investment is otherwise consistent with state law fiduciary requirements, including
the obligation to incur only reasonable expenses and to periodically review the prudence of retaining
these investments.
If you have any further questions on this matter, please contact Ellen Broadman, Director of the
Securities and Corporate Practices Division, at (202) 874-5210.
Sincerely,
/s/
Julie L. Williams
Chief Counsel
Interpretations - Letter 722
(3 of 3)

## Nearby sections

- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 719 Letter concludes that an ESOP is a "company' for purposes of 12 U.S.C. 371c and that an ESOP that controls at least 25% of a bank's voting stock is an "affiliate" under sec. 371c (supersedes existing OCC interpretive letter #261). (10/26/89)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0719.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 720 Group of affiliate national banks may collectively own, through operating subsidiaries, minority interest in a merchant credit card processing subsidiary. (01/26/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0720.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 722 A national bank may invest CIF assets in mutual funds, including mutual funds that pay the bank a servicing fee, without the bank having to reduce its trustee fees, if the bank concludes, based upon a reasoned opinion of trust counsel, that such an arrangement is authorized by applicable state law, is consistent with the trust instrument, is appropriate for the particular trust accounts, and is consistent with OCC regulations, including in particular 12 C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12). (03/12/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0722.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 724 Bank can sell vehicle service contracts to customers who use home equity loan proceeds to purchase a vehicle, and the maturity of the service contract may be different from the maturity of the loan. (04/22/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0724.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 725 National bank to establish an operating subsidiary to engage in permissible derivatives-related activities. (05/10/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0725.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 726 Letter concerns the application of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations to financial institutions' support of microenterprise lending programs. (06/21/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0726.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 730 Letter concludes that loans proposed by the bank to an unaffiliated distributor of mutual funds would not be subject to interaffiliate lending restrictions contained in 12 U.S.C. 371C. (05/29/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0730.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 732 National bank may make a 5.5% investment in software company which is engaged in the design, development, marketing and maintenance of a network for electronic funds transfers and electronic data interchange, including transacting electronic commerce and marketing software products for use on its world-wide electronic commerce network. (05/10/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0732.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 733 National bank receiver is subject to the rights of secured creditors and creditors entitled to setoff. U.S. legal principles regarding enforcement of security interests are applicable to a receivership of a federal branch or agency conducted under National Bank Act. Therefore, receiver of an uninsured federal branch or agency does not have the right to interfere with the rights of secured creditors, including application of collateral held in U.S. to obligations of a non-U.S. office of the bank. (06/19/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0733.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 736 Lending limit exception for participations not limited to banks. Non-banks may act as participants. (07/25/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0736.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 737 Huntington National Bank's acquisition of minority interest in a limited liability company providing stored value systems. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0737.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 738 National bank's participation in a guaranty issued by an agent for a syndication of lenders with respect to their borrower's letter of credit reimbursement obligations to another bank or financial institution is permissible under I.R. 7.1016. (08/14/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0738.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 740 Letter advises the Bank as follows: 1) The question of whether "salary" as used in 12 C.F.R. 2.4 includes an officer's base salary, bonuses, director's fees and/or any other compensation paid by the Bank must be determined by the Bank's management; 2) the question of whether the payment bonuses for credit life sales under 12 C.F.R. 2.4 is based on salary received by the recipient in a calendar year, a fiscal year, or any 12-month period must be determined by the Bank's management; and 3) pursuant to 12 C.F.R. 2.4, if the Bank's CEO is a loan officer and the CEO participates in the bonus plan under which payments based on credit life insurance sales are made, the CEO must be included in averaging the salaries of loan officers that participate in the Bank's bonus or incentive plan. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0740.md)
- [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 741 National bank may acquire majority interest in company which operates call center facility which operates programs by which potential customers for new or used automobiles may access databases containing information on the used and new car inventories of numerous automobile dealerships in its metropolitan area. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0741.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0722. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.