# OCC Interpretive Letter No. 709: Letter opines that, in its CRA evaluation, an institution that invests in a community development bank may have its investment considered under the regulation's investment test, or it may choose to have a portion of its investment evaluated under the lending test and the remainder evaluated under the investment test (Replaces Interpretive Letter #709 in its entirety). (06/14/96) > Federal · Agency guidance · In force URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0709 ## Section - **Citation:** OCC Interpretive Letter No. 709 - **Heading:** Letter opines that, in its CRA evaluation, an institution that invests in a community development bank may have its investment considered under the regulation's investment test, or it may choose to have a portion of its investment evaluated under the lending test and the remainder evaluated under the investment test (Replaces Interpretive Letter #709 in its entirety). (06/14/96) - **Jurisdiction:** Federal - **Kind:** Agency guidance - **Status:** In force - **Text as of:** August 14, 2026 - **Source:** Compiled text - **Location:** OCC Interpretive Letters / Letter opines that, in its CRA evaluation, an institution that invests in a community development bank may have its investment considered under the regulation's investment test, or it may choose to have a portion of its investment evaluated under the lending test and the remainder evaluated under the investment test (Replaces Interpretive Letter #709 in its entirety). (06/14/96). ## Text This letter supersedes the February 21, 1996, letter in its entirety. Because this letter 1 replaces the previous letter, we have substantially reiterated herein the portions of the previous letter that remain valid (with some minor edits for clarity). This letter contains a revised formula for determining the amount of community development loans made by a CDB in which a financial institution has invested for which the institution may receive consideration under the lending test. This letter addresses only CRA consideration for an investment in a CDB. It assumes 2 that such an investment is legally authorized; however, it does not authorize such an investment. In a separate letter dated February 1, 1996, the OCC approved a national bank’s investment in the CDB as a community development investment under 12 U.S.C. § 24 Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Federal Reserve Board Office of Thrift Supervision Interpretive Letter 709 (Revised) July 1996 12 U.S.C. 2901 June 14, 1996 [ ] Dear [ ]: This letter replaces our letter dated February 21, 1996, which responded to your request for clarification about the extent to which an institution that invests in a Community Development Bank (CDB) may obtain positive consideration under the lending test portion of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations published May 4, 1995. See 60 Fed. Reg. 22,156 (May 4, 1995). Staff from all four of the financial institution regulatory agencies have reconsidered the issues you raised, and they concur in the opinions expressed in this letter. As discussed 1 below, an institution that invests in a CDB may obtain favorable consideration under the regulation's investment test, or it may choose to have a portion of its investment evaluated under the lending test and the remainder evaluated under the investment test.2 tion regulatory agencies have reconsidered the issues you raised, and they concur in the opinions expressed in this letter. As discussed 1 below, an institution that invests in a CDB may obtain favorable consideration under the regulation's investment test, or it may choose to have a portion of its investment evaluated under the lending test and the remainder evaluated under the investment test.2 (Eleventh) and 12 C.F.R. part 24. 2 The CRA was designed to encourage institutions to help meet the credit needs of their entire communities, including low- and moderate-income areas, consistent with safe and sound lending practices. The new regulations set out a number of different tests for examiners to use in evaluating CRA performance, depending on the type of activity and the size and type of institution. Your letter focuses on whether institutions' investments in the CDB will receive positive consideration under the lending and investment tests. Our response, therefore, addresses consideration under the lending and investment tests, which are applicable primarily to large institutions. The lending test evaluates an institution's lending activities by considering the institution's purchase or origination of home mortgage, small business, small farm, community development, and, in some instances, consumer loans. Among the performance criteria considered in the lending test is an institution's community development lending, including the number and amount of community development loans and their complexity and innovativeness. See 12 C.F.R. §§ 25.22(b)(4), 228.22(b)(4), 345.22(b)(4), and 563e.22(b)(4). A “community development loan” must have community development as its primary purpose and, except in the case of wholesale or limited purpose banks, must benefit the institution's assessment area(s) or a broader statewide or regional area that includes the institution's assessment area(s). See 12 C.F.R. §§ 25.12(i)(1) & (2)(ii), 228.12(i)(1) & (2)(ii), 345.12(i)(1) & (2)(ii), and 563e.12(h)(1) & (2)(ii) unity development loan” must have community development as its primary purpose and, except in the case of wholesale or limited purpose banks, must benefit the institution's assessment area(s) or a broader statewide or regional area that includes the institution's assessment area(s). See 12 C.F.R. §§ 25.12(i)(1) & (2)(ii), 228.12(i)(1) & (2)(ii), 345.12(i)(1) & (2)(ii), and 563e.12(h)(1) & (2)(ii). The regulation allows an institution that invests in a community development financial institution, such as a CDB, or other entity that uses the institution's investment to make loans to receive consideration under the lending test for its pro rata share of community development loans made by the entity. See 12 C.F.R. §§ 25.22(d), 228.22(d), 345.22(d), and 563e.22(d). The investment test evaluates an institution's number and amount of qualified investments, the innovativeness or complexity of its qualified investments, the responsiveness of the qualified investments to credit and community development needs, and the degree to which the qualified investments are not routinely provided by private investors. See 12 C.F.R. §§ 25.23(e), 228.23(e), 345.23(e), and 563e.23(e). Qualified investments include lawful investments, deposits, membership shares or grants that have as their primary purpose community development. See 12 C.F.R. §§ 25.12(s), 228.12(s), 345.12(s), and 563e.12(r). To be considered under the investment test, qualified investments must benefit the institution's assessment area(s) or a broader statewide or regional area that includes the institution's assessment area(s). See 12 C.F.R. §§ 25.23(a), 228.23(a), 345.23(a), and 563e.23(a). Qualified investments include, but are not limited to, investments in CDBs that primarily lend in 345.12(s), and 563e.12(r). To be considered under the investment test, qualified investments must benefit the institution's assessment area(s) or a broader statewide or regional area that includes the institution's assessment area(s). See 12 C.F.R. §§ 25.23(a), 228.23(a), 345.23(a), and 563e.23(a). Qualified investments include, but are not limited to, investments in CDBs that primarily lend in 3 low- and moderate-income areas or to low- and moderate-income individuals to promote community development and investments in state and municipal obligations that specifically support community development. See 60 Fed. Reg. at 22,162 n.3. As noted above, an institution may choose to have its investment evaluated entirely under the investment test, or it may choose to have a portion of its investment evaluated under the lending test and a portion evaluated under the investment test. However, in doing so, the institution must provide the appropriate supervisory agency with the necessary information to calculate the breakdown between the two components. An example may help to illustrate how an institution's investment in a CDB may be considered under the CRA regulations. Assume an institution invests $1 million in a CDB that has a total capitalization of $10 million. The CDB, in turn, holds total assets of $30 million, with $12 million in qualified investments and $18 million in community development loans. The investing institution could choose to have its investment considered only under the investment test. If the institution chooses this option, the amount of the qualified investment would be $1 million, the total amount of the institution's investment. Alternatively, the investing institution could request consideration under both the investment and lending tests. The amount attributed to the investment test would equal the product of the institution's investment in the CDB and the percentage of the CDB's asset portfolio that is comprised of qualified investments investment would be $1 million, the total amount of the institution's investment. Alternatively, the investing institution could request consideration under both the investment and lending tests. The amount attributed to the investment test would equal the product of the institution's investment in the CDB and the percentage of the CDB's asset portfolio that is comprised of qualified investments. The amount attributed to the lending test would equal the investing institution's pro rata share of community development loans originated by the CDB during the period under review. Applying these principles to the example above may help to clarify how an institution's investment in a CDB may be attributed between the investment and lending tests. In the example, qualified investments comprise 40 percent of the CDB's total assets ($12 million of total assets of $30 million). Thus, under the investment test, the investing institution would receive consideration of 40 percent of its total investment in the CDB, or $400,000. It is assumed that the remainder of the institution's investment has been used to fund community development loans in an amount equal to the institution's pro rata share of loans originated by the CDB. The institution has supplied ten percent of the capital of the CDB, which provides the basis for determining, under the lending test, the institution's pro rata share of community development loans made by the CDB. Assuming the CDB's $18 million in loans were originated during the period under review and benefit the institution's assessment area(s) or a broader statewide or regional area that includes the institution's assessment area(s), the capital of the CDB, which provides the basis for determining, under the lending test, the institution's pro rata share of community development loans made by the CDB. Assuming the CDB's $18 million in loans were originated during the period under review and benefit the institution's assessment area(s) or a broader statewide or regional area that includes the institution's assessment area(s), the 4 institution's pro rata share of these loans would be $1.8 million. Therefore, the institution may receive consideration for $1.8 million in community development loans under the lending test. I trust this letter is responsive to your inquiry. You may also be interested to know that the staffs of the four financial supervisory agencies are presently developing official guidance for the public to aid in resolving interpretive questions arising under the new CRA regulations. In the meantime, if you have further questions, please feel free to call me or Margaret Hesse, an attorney on my staff, at (202) 874-5750. Sincerely yours, \s\ Matthew Roberts Director Community and Consumer Law Division Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ## Nearby sections - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 719 Letter concludes that an ESOP is a "company' for purposes of 12 U.S.C. 371c and that an ESOP that controls at least 25% of a bank's voting stock is an "affiliate" under sec. 371c (supersedes existing OCC interpretive letter #261). (10/26/89)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0719.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 720 Group of affiliate national banks may collectively own, through operating subsidiaries, minority interest in a merchant credit card processing subsidiary. (01/26/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0720.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 722 A national bank may invest CIF assets in mutual funds, including mutual funds that pay the bank a servicing fee, without the bank having to reduce its trustee fees, if the bank concludes, based upon a reasoned opinion of trust counsel, that such an arrangement is authorized by applicable state law, is consistent with the trust instrument, is appropriate for the particular trust accounts, and is consistent with OCC regulations, including in particular 12 C.F.R. 9.18(b)(12). (03/12/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0722.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 724 Bank can sell vehicle service contracts to customers who use home equity loan proceeds to purchase a vehicle, and the maturity of the service contract may be different from the maturity of the loan. (04/22/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0724.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 725 National bank to establish an operating subsidiary to engage in permissible derivatives-related activities. (05/10/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0725.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 726 Letter concerns the application of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations to financial institutions' support of microenterprise lending programs. (06/21/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0726.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 730 Letter concludes that loans proposed by the bank to an unaffiliated distributor of mutual funds would not be subject to interaffiliate lending restrictions contained in 12 U.S.C. 371C. (05/29/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0730.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 732 National bank may make a 5.5% investment in software company which is engaged in the design, development, marketing and maintenance of a network for electronic funds transfers and electronic data interchange, including transacting electronic commerce and marketing software products for use on its world-wide electronic commerce network. (05/10/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0732.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 733 National bank receiver is subject to the rights of secured creditors and creditors entitled to setoff. U.S. legal principles regarding enforcement of security interests are applicable to a receivership of a federal branch or agency conducted under National Bank Act. Therefore, receiver of an uninsured federal branch or agency does not have the right to interfere with the rights of secured creditors, including application of collateral held in U.S. to obligations of a non-U.S. office of the bank. (06/19/96).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0733.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 736 Lending limit exception for participations not limited to banks. Non-banks may act as participants. (07/25/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0736.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 737 Huntington National Bank's acquisition of minority interest in a limited liability company providing stored value systems. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0737.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 738 National bank's participation in a guaranty issued by an agent for a syndication of lenders with respect to their borrower's letter of credit reimbursement obligations to another bank or financial institution is permissible under I.R. 7.1016. (08/14/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0738.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 740 Letter advises the Bank as follows: 1) The question of whether "salary" as used in 12 C.F.R. 2.4 includes an officer's base salary, bonuses, director's fees and/or any other compensation paid by the Bank must be determined by the Bank's management; 2) the question of whether the payment bonuses for credit life sales under 12 C.F.R. 2.4 is based on salary received by the recipient in a calendar year, a fiscal year, or any 12-month period must be determined by the Bank's management; and 3) pursuant to 12 C.F.R. 2.4, if the Bank's CEO is a loan officer and the CEO participates in the bonus plan under which payments based on credit life insurance sales are made, the CEO must be included in averaging the salaries of loan officers that participate in the Bank's bonus or incentive plan. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0740.md) - [OCC Interpretive Letter No. 741 National bank may acquire majority interest in company which operates call center facility which operates programs by which potential customers for new or used automobiles may access databases containing information on the used and new car inventories of numerous automobile dealerships in its metropolitan area. (08/19/96)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0741.md) --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/OCC_INT0709. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.