# HI Commissioner's Memorandum 2002-4A: USA Patriot Act of 2001

> Hawaii · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/HI_INS_CM_2002-4A

## Section

- **Citation:** HI Commissioner's Memorandum 2002-4A
- **Heading:** USA Patriot Act of 2001
- **Jurisdiction:** Hawaii
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** Hawaii Insurance Division Commissioner's Memoranda / USA Patriot Act of 2001

## Text

STATE OF HAWAII
INSURANCE DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE & CONSUMER AFFAIRS
P. O. BOX 3614
HONOLULU, HAWAII 96811-3614
250 S. KING ST., 5TH FLOOR
HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813

April 17, 2002

Memorandum 2002-4A

To:
All Hawaii Domesticated Insurers and Licensees

From: Wayne C. Metcalf, III

Insurance Commissioner, State of Hawaii

RE:
USA Patriot Act of 2001

On October 26, 2001, President Bush signed into law the “Uniting and Strengthening America
by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA Patriot) Act
of 2001”1 (Act). This law, enacted in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,
strengthens our Nation’s ability to combat terrorism and prevent and detect money-laundering
activities.

The purpose of this Commissioner’s Memorandum is to advise persons or entities regulated by
the Hawaii Insurance Division of important new responsibilities under the Act. In particular,
Section 352 of the Act amends the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)2 to require that all financial
institutions establish an anti-money laundering program and Section 326 amends the BSA to
require the Secretary of the Treasury (Treasury) to adopt minimum standards for financial
institutions regarding the identity of customers that open accounts.

Section 352 – Establishing Anti-Money Laundering Programs

Section 352 of the Act requires the establishment of an anti-money laundering program,
including, at a minimum:

• The development of internal policies, procedures, and controls. These should be
appropriate for the level of risk of money laundering identified;
• The designation of a compliance officer. The officer should have appropriate training
and background to execute their responsibilities. Additionally, the compliance officer
should have access to senior management;
• An ongoing employee training program. A training program should match training to the
employees’ roles in the organization and their job functions
oney laundering identified;
• The designation of a compliance officer. The officer should have appropriate training
and background to execute their responsibilities. Additionally, the compliance officer
should have access to senior management;
• An ongoing employee training program. A training program should match training to the
employees’ roles in the organization and their job functions. The training program
should be provided as often as necessary to address gaps created by movement of
employees within the organization and turnover; and
BENJAMIN J. CAYETANO
GOVERNOR

MAZIE K. HIRONO
LT. GOVERNOR

KATHRYN S. MATAYOSHI
DIRECTOR

WAYNE METCALF
INSURANCE COMMISSIONER

Memorandum 2002- (April 17, 2002)
Insurance Commissioner Wayne C. Metcalf, III
Page 2

• An independent audit function to test the programs. The independent audit function does
not require engaging outside consultants. Internal staff that is independent of those
developing and executing the anti-money laundering program may conduct the audit.

Treasury is currently drafting a regulation describing the anti-money laundering compliance
program for insurers. The regulation may borrow from the anti-money laundering compliance
program rule recently proposed by the NASD for broker-dealers3, and is expected to be
promulgated in late spring or early summer.

Insurance companies are included in the BSA’s definition of financial institution, and should be
prepared to comply with the new law and the regulations promulgated thereunder. Section 352
of the Act becomes effective on April 24, 2002. All insurance companies are required to be
in compliance with the law by that date.

As part of its rulemaking process, Treasury is determining the extent to which other insurance
entities will be considered financial institutions for purposes of the regulation
to comply with the new law and the regulations promulgated thereunder. Section 352
of the Act becomes effective on April 24, 2002. All insurance companies are required to be
in compliance with the law by that date.

As part of its rulemaking process, Treasury is determining the extent to which other insurance
entities will be considered financial institutions for purposes of the regulation. It is anticipated
that the regulation could cover all other persons and entities engaged in the business of
insurance, including brokers, agents, and managing general agents, and may also include other
regulated entities. These insurance entities will be required to comply with the regulation by the
regulation’s effective date.

Anti-money laundering programs are not anticipated to be “one size fits all.” Rather, it is
expected that they will be developed using a risk-based approach. Development of an anti-
money laundering program should begin with identification of those areas, processes and
programs that are susceptible to money laundering activities. The practices and procedures
implemented under the program should reflect the risks of money laundering given the entity’s
products, methods of distribution, contact with customers and forms of customer payment and
deposits.

Section 326 – Customer Identification

Section 326 of the Act amends the BSA to require that Treasury issue regulations setting forth
minimum standards for financial institutions regarding the identity of their customers in
connection with the purchase of a policy or contract of insurance. This program must set forth
customer identity verification and documentation procedures, as well as procedures the insurer
will employ to notify its customers about this requirement and determine whether the customer
appears on government lists of known or suspected terrorists or terrorist organizations.

Final regulations regarding this requirement are to be issued by the Department of the Treasury
by October 26, 2002
customer identity verification and documentation procedures, as well as procedures the insurer
will employ to notify its customers about this requirement and determine whether the customer
appears on government lists of known or suspected terrorists or terrorist organizations.

Final regulations regarding this requirement are to be issued by the Department of the Treasury
by October 26, 2002. Proposed regulations will be published in the Federal Register4 later in the
year. Through the rulemaking process, Treasury will determine which insurance entities will be
subject to the regulations. Insurance entities subject to the rules will be required to comply when
the final Treasury regulations become effective.

Memorandum 2002- (April 17, 2002)
Insurance Commissioner Wayne C. Metcalf, III
Page 3

Requests for additional information or questions regarding the Act may be directed to Linda L.
Duzick, Office of Thrift Supervision, serving as insurance industry liaison for the Department of
the Treasury, at (202) 906-6565 or Linda.duzick@ots.treas.gov.

End Notes

1The full text of the law can be obtained at www.access.gpo.gov/congress. Scroll to public and private laws, select
107th Congress, and select Public Law 107-56.
2Codified in subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, U.S. Code.
367CFR 8565 (February 25, 2002)
4The Federal Register website address is www.access.gpo.gov/nara.

## Nearby sections

- [HI Commissioner's Memorandum 2002-1E memo](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/HI_INS_CM_2002-1E.md)
- [HI Commissioner's Memorandum 2002-2A memo](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/HI_INS_CM_2002-2A.md)
- [HI Commissioner's Memorandum 2002-3L memo](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/HI_INS_CM_2002-3L.md)
- [HI Commissioner's Memorandum 2002-4A USA Patriot Act of 2001](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/HI_INS_CM_2002-4A.md)
- [HI Commissioner's Memorandum 2002-5A New Cost for Peer Review / No-Fault Challenges](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/HI_INS_CM_2002-5A.md)
- [HI Commissioner's Memorandum 2002-6L ins commissioners memorandum 6l](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/HI_INS_CM_2002-6L.md)
- [HI Commissioner's Memorandum 2002-7A Coverage of Emergency Services](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/HI_INS_CM_2002-7A.md)
- [HI Commissioner's Memorandum 2002-8A Self-Insured Automobiles](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/HI_INS_CM_2002-8A.md)
- [HI Commissioner's Memorandum 2002-9R ins memorandum 2000 9r](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/HI_INS_CM_2002-9R.md)
- [HI Commissioner's Memorandum 2002-10R Annual Publication of Motor Vehicle Insurers and Premiums](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/HI_INS_CM_2002-10R.md)
- [HI Commissioner's Memorandum 2002-11E memo](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/HI_INS_CM_2002-11E.md)
- [HI Commissioner's Memorandum 2002-12E memo](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/HI_INS_CM_2002-12E.md)
- [HI Commissioner's Memorandum 2002-13H memo](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/HI_INS_CM_2002-13H.md)
- [HI Commissioner's Memorandum 2002-14E memo](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/HI_INS_CM_2002-14E.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/HI_INS_CM_2002-4A. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.
