# 70 FR 72739: Privacy Act; Proposed Implementation

> Federal · Regulations · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_E5-7001

## Section

- **Citation:** 70 FR 72739
- **Heading:** Privacy Act; Proposed Implementation
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Regulations
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** Federal Register / Vol. 70 / 70 FR 72739

## Text

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 31 CFR Part 1 Privacy Act; Proposed Implementation AGENCY:
Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION:
Proposed rule.

SUMMARY:
In accordance with the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, the Department of the Treasury gives notice of a proposed amendment to this part to exempt a new Internal Revenue Service (IRS) system of records entitled “IRS 50.222 Tax Exempt/Government Entities (TE/GE) Case Management Records” from certain provisions of the Privacy Act.

DATES:
Comments must be received no later than January 6, 2006. You may also submit comments through the Federal rulemaking portal at http://www.regulations.gov (follow the instructions for submitting comments).

ADDRESSES:
Please submit comments to the Office of Governmental Liaison and Disclosure, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. Comments will be made available for inspection at the IRS Freedom of Information Reading Room (Room 1621), at the above address. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 622-5164.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Telephonic inquiries should be directed to Marianne Davis, Program Analyst, Internal Revenue Service, Tax Exempt/Government Entities Division (TE/GE), at telephone number (949) 389-4304. Written inquiries should be directed to Robert Brenneman, TE/GE Reporting and Electronic Examination System (TREES) Project Manager, at Internal Revenue Service, TE/GE Business Systems Planning (SE:T:BSP), 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Attn: PE-6M4, Washington, DC 20224.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the head of an agency may promulgate rules to exempt a system of records from certain provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a if the system contains investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes. The IRS is hereby giving notice of a proposed rule to exempt “IRS 50.222 Tax Exempt/Government Entities (TE/GE) Case Management Records” from certain provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, pursuant to 5 U.S.C
d of an agency may promulgate rules to exempt a system of records from certain provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a if the system contains investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes. The IRS is hereby giving notice of a proposed rule to exempt “IRS 50.222 Tax Exempt/Government Entities (TE/GE) Case Management Records” from certain provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2). The proposed exemption is from provisions 552a(c)(3), (d) (1), (2), (3) and (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), and (f) because the system contains investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes. A proposed notice to establish the Privacy Act system of records will be published separately in the Federal Register .
The following are the reasons why this system of records maintained by the IRS is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) of the Privacy Act of 1974:
(1) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3). These provisions of the Privacy Act provide for the release of the disclosure accounting required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(1) and (2) to the individual named in the record at his/her request. The reasons for exempting this system of records from the foregoing provisions are:
(i) The release of disclosure accounting would put the tax exempt or government entity subject to investigation, or individuals connected with those entities, on notice that an investigation exists and that such person is the subject of that investigation.
o the individual named in the record at his/her request. The reasons for exempting this system of records from the foregoing provisions are:
(i) The release of disclosure accounting would put the tax exempt or government entity subject to investigation, or individuals connected with those entities, on notice that an investigation exists and that such person is the subject of that investigation.
(ii) Such release would provide the tax exempt or government entity subject to investigation, or individuals connected with those entities, with an accurate accounting of the date, nature, and purpose of each disclosure and the name and address of the person or agency to which disclosure was made. The release of such information to the individual covered by the system would provide the individual or entity subject to investigation with significant information concerning the nature of the investigation and could result in the altering or destruction of documentary evidence, the improper influencing of witnesses, and other activities that could impede or compromise the investigation. In the case of a delinquent account, such release might enable the subject of the investigation to dissipate assets before levy.
(iii) Release to the individual of the disclosure accounting would alert the individual as to which agencies were investigating the tax exempt or government entity subject to investigation, would provide information concerning the scope of the investigation, and could aid the individual in impeding or compromising investigations by those agencies.
investigation to dissipate assets before levy.
(iii) Release to the individual of the disclosure accounting would alert the individual as to which agencies were investigating the tax exempt or government entity subject to investigation, would provide information concerning the scope of the investigation, and could aid the individual in impeding or compromising investigations by those agencies.
(2) 5 U.S.C. 552a (d) (1), (2), (3) and (4), (e) (4) (G), (e) (4) (H), and (f). These provisions of the Privacy Act relate to an individual's right to be notified of: The existence of records pertaining to such individual; requirements for identifying an individual who requested access to records; the agency procedures relating to access to records; the content of the information contained in such records; and the civil remedies available to the individual in the event of adverse determinations by an agency concerning access to or amendment of information contained in record systems.
The reasons for exempting this system of records from the foregoing provisions are as follows:
Notifying an individual (at the individual's request) of the existence of an investigative file pertaining to such individual or granting access to an investigative file pertaining to such individual could: Interfere with investigative and enforcement proceedings; deprive co-defendants of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication; constitute an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of others; disclose the identity of confidential sources and reveal confidential information supplied by
(3) 5 U.S.C. 552a (e) (1). This provision of the Privacy Act requires each agency to maintain in its records only such information about an individual as is relevant and necessary to accomplish a purpose of the agency required to be accomplished by statute or executive order. The reasons for exempting this system of records from the foregoing provision are as follows:
al information supplied by
(3) 5 U.S.C. 552a (e) (1). This provision of the Privacy Act requires each agency to maintain in its records only such information about an individual as is relevant and necessary to accomplish a purpose of the agency required to be accomplished by statute or executive order. The reasons for exempting this system of records from the foregoing provision are as follows:
(i) The IRS will limit the system to those records that are needed for compliance with the provisions of Title 26. However, an exemption from the foregoing is needed because, particularly in the early stages of an investigation, it is not possible to determine the relevance or necessity of specific information.
(ii) Relevance and necessity are questions of judgment and timing. What appears relevant and necessary when first received may subsequently be determined to be irrelevant or unnecessary. It is only after the information is evaluated that the relevance and necessity of such information can be established with certainty.
(4) 5 U.S.C. 552a (e) (4) (I). This provision of the Privacy Act requires the publication of the categories of sources of records in each system of records. The reasons for exempting this system of records from this provision are as follows:
(i) Revealing categories of sources of information could disclose investigative techniques and procedures.
(ii) Revealing categories of sources of information could cause sources who supply information to investigators to refrain from giving such information because of fear of reprisal, or fear of breach of promises of anonymity and confidentiality.
As required by Executive Order 12866, it has been determined that this proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action, and therefore, does not require a regulatory impact analysis
rces of information could cause sources who supply information to investigators to refrain from giving such information because of fear of reprisal, or fear of breach of promises of anonymity and confidentiality.
As required by Executive Order 12866, it has been determined that this proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action, and therefore, does not require a regulatory impact analysis.
The regulation will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this proposed rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, it is hereby certified that these regulations will not significantly affect a substantial number of small entities. The proposed rule imposes no duties or obligations on small entities.
In accordance with the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Department of the Treasury has determined that this proposed rule would not impose new recordkeeping, application, reporting, or other types of information collection requirements.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 1
Privacy.

Part 1, subpart C of title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 1—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
5 U.S.C. 301 and 31 U.S.C. 321. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended. Subpart C also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Section 1.36 paragraph (g)(1)(viii) is amended by adding the following text to the table in numerical order.
§ 1.36 Systems exempt in whole or in part from provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a and this part.
citation for part 1 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
5 U.S.C. 301 and 31 U.S.C. 321. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended. Subpart C also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Section 1.36 paragraph (g)(1)(viii) is amended by adding the following text to the table in numerical order.
§ 1.36 Systems exempt in whole or in part from provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a and this part.
(g) * * *
(1) * * *
(viii) * * *
No. Name of system *    *    *    *    * IRS 50.222 Tax Exempt/Government Entities Case Management Records. *    *    *    *    * *    *    *    *    *
Dated: November 18, 2005. Sandra L. Pack, Assistant Secretary for Management and Chief Financial Officer.

[FR Doc. E5-7001 Filed 12-6-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P

## Nearby sections

- [70 FR 735 Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 777-200 Series Airplanes](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_05-170.md)
- [70 FR 1216 Chemical Weapons Convention Regulations](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_05-287.md)
- [70 FR 1397 Proposed Establishment of Class E2 Airspace; and Modification of Class E5 Airspace; Ames, IA](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_05-373.md)
- [70 FR 1400 Security Zone; Port of Mobile, Mobile Ship Channel, Mobile, AL](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_05-379.md)
- [70 FR 1403 Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy; Licensing of Government Owned Inventions](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_05-338.md)
- [70 FR 1837 Grapes Grown in a Designated Area of Southeastern California; Increased Assessment Rate](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_05-470.md)
- [70 FR 1841 Eligibility for Health Care Benefits for Certain Filipino Veterans in the United States](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_05-493.md)
- [70 FR 2067 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330, A340-200, and A340-300 Series Airplanes](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_05-612.md)
- [70 FR 2072 Requirement for Reporting the Kimberley Process Certificate Number for Exports (Reexports) of Rough Diamonds](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_05-597.md)
- [70 FR 2074 Notice of Intent To Request Public Comments](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_05-593.md)
- [70 FR 2080 Electronic filing-Annual Financial and Actuarial Information; Correction](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_05-635.md)
- [70 FR 2081 Assessment of Civil Penalties for Misuse of Words, Letters, Symbols, and Emblems of the United States Mint](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_05-543.md)
- [70 FR 2101 Proposed Approval of Waste Characterization Activities at the Hanford Central Characterization Project for Disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_05-618.md)
- [70 FR 2108 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Monkfish Fishery; Amendment 2 to the Monkfish Fishery Management Plan; Correction](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_05-625.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_E5-7001. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.