# 64 FR 45920: List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: (TN-68) Addition

> Federal · Regulations · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-21798

## Section

- **Citation:** 64 FR 45920
- **Heading:** List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: (TN-68) Addition
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Regulations
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** Federal Register / Vol. 64 / 64 FR 45920

## Text

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

10 CFR Part 72

RIN 3150-AG 30

List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: (TN-68) Addition

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is proposing to amend
its regulations to add the Transnuclear TN-68 cask system to the list
of approved spent fuel storage casks. This amendment will allow the
holders of power reactor operating licenses to store spent fuel in the
Transnuclear TN-68 cask system under a general license.

DATES: The comment period expires November 8, 1999. Comments received
after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the
NRC is able to assure consideration only for comments received on or
before this date.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attn: Rulemakings and
Adjudications Staff. Hand deliver comments to 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, MD, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on Federal workdays.
You may also provide comments via the NRC's interactive rulemaking
website (http://ruleforum.llnl.gov). This site provides the
availability to upload comments as files (any format) if your web
browser supports that function. For information about the interactive
rulemaking site, contact Ms. Carol Gallagher (301) 415-5905; e-mail
[email protected].
Certain documents related to this rulemaking, including comments
received by the NRC, may be examined at the NRC Public Document Room,
2120 L Street NW. (Lower Level), Washington, DC. These documents also
may be viewed and downloaded electronically via the interactive
rulemaking website established by NRC for this rulemaking.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stan Turel, telephone (301) 415-6234,
e-mail, [email protected] of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
, DC. These documents also
may be viewed and downloaded electronically via the interactive
rulemaking website established by NRC for this rulemaking.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stan Turel, telephone (301) 415-6234,
e-mail, [email protected] of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Section 218(a) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended
(NWPA), requires, ``for the dry storage of spent nuclear fuel at
civilian power reactor sites, with the objective of establishing one or
more technologies the (Nuclear Regulatory) Commission may, by rule,
approve for use at the sites of civilian nuclear power reactors
without, to the maximum extent practicable, the need for additional
site-specific approvals by the Commission.'' Section 133 of the NWPA
states, in part, ``[t]he Commission shall, by rule, establish
procedures for the licensing of any technology approved by the
Commission under Section 218(a) for use at the site of any civilian
nuclear power reactor.''
To implement this mandate, the Commission approved dry storage of
spent nuclear fuel in NRC-approved

casks under a general license, publishing on July 18, 1990, a final
rule in 10 CFR part 72 entitled, ``General License for Storage of Spent
Fuel at Power Reactor Sites'' (55 FR 29181). This rule also established
a new Subpart L within 10 CFR Part 72 entitled ``Approval of Spent Fuel
Storage Casks,'' containing procedures and criteria for obtaining NRC
approval of dry storage cask designs.

Discussion
der a general license, publishing on July 18, 1990, a final
rule in 10 CFR part 72 entitled, ``General License for Storage of Spent
Fuel at Power Reactor Sites'' (55 FR 29181). This rule also established
a new Subpart L within 10 CFR Part 72 entitled ``Approval of Spent Fuel
Storage Casks,'' containing procedures and criteria for obtaining NRC
approval of dry storage cask designs.

Discussion

This proposed rule would add the Transnuclear TN-68 cask system to
the list of NRC-approved casks for spent fuel storage in 10 CFR 72.214.
Following the procedures specified in 10 CFR 72.230 of subpart L,
Transnuclear, Inc., submitted an application for NRC approval with the
Safety Analysis Report (SAR): ``Final Safety Analysis Report for the
TN-68 Dry Storage Cask,'' dated January 23, 1998. The NRC evaluated the
Transnuclear, Inc., submittal and issued a preliminary Safety
Evaluation Report (SER) on the Transnuclear, Inc., SAR and proposed
Certificate of Compliance (CoC) for the Transnuclear TN-68 cask system
on August 9, 1999.
The NRC is proposing to approve the Transnuclear TN-68 cask system
for storage of spent fuel under the conditions specified in the
proposed CoC. This cask system, when used in accordance with the
conditions specified in the CoC and NRC regulations, will meet the
requirements of 10 CFR part 72; thus, adequate protection of the public
health and safety would be ensured. This cask system is being proposed
for listing under 10 CFR 72.214, ``List of approved spent fuel storage
casks,'' to allow holders of power reactor operating licenses to store
spent fuel in this cask system under a general license. The CoC would
terminate 20 years after the effective date of the final rule listing
this cask in 10 CFR 72.214, unless the cask system's CoC is renewed.
The certificate contains conditions for use which are specific for this
cask system and addresses issues such as operating procedures, training
exercises, and spent fuel specification
e
spent fuel in this cask system under a general license. The CoC would
terminate 20 years after the effective date of the final rule listing
this cask in 10 CFR 72.214, unless the cask system's CoC is renewed.
The certificate contains conditions for use which are specific for this
cask system and addresses issues such as operating procedures, training
exercises, and spent fuel specification.
The proposed CoC for the Transnuclear TN-68 cask system and the
underlying preliminary SER, dated August 9, 1999, are available for
inspection and comment at the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street,
NW. (Lower Level), Washington, DC. Single copies of the proposed CoC
and preliminary SER may be obtained from Stan Turel, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555, telephone (301) 415-6234, email [email protected].

Discussion of Proposed Amendments by Section

Section 72.214 List of approved spent fuel storage casks.

Certificate Number 1027 would be added indicating that:
(1) The title of the SAR submitted by Transnuclear, Inc., is
``Final Safety Analysis Report for the TN-68 Dry Storage Cask'';
(2) The certificate expiration date would be 20 years after final
rule effective date; and
(3) The model number affected is TN-68.

Finding of No Significant Environmental Impact: Availability

Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended,
and the NRC regulations in subpart A of 10 CFR part 51, the NRC has
determined that this rule, if adopted, would not be a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment
and, therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required. The
rule is mainly administrative in nature. It would not have significant
environmental impacts
y Act of 1969, as amended,
and the NRC regulations in subpart A of 10 CFR part 51, the NRC has
determined that this rule, if adopted, would not be a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment
and, therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required. The
rule is mainly administrative in nature. It would not have significant
environmental impacts. The proposed rule would add the Transnuclear TN-
68 cask system to the list of approved spent fuel storage casks that
power reactor licensees can use to store spent fuel at reactor sites
without additional site-specific approvals by the NRC. The
environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact on which
this determination is based are available for inspection at the NRC
Public Document Room, 2120 L Street NW. (Lower Level), Washington, DC.
Single copies of the environmental assessment and finding of no
significant impact are available from Stan Turel, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555, Telephone (301) 415-6234, email [email protected].

Agreement State Compatibility

Under the ``Policy Statement on Adequacy and Compatibility of
Agreement State Programs'' approved by the Commission on June 30, 1997,
and published in the Federal Register on September 3, 1997 (62 FR
46517), this rule is classified as compatibility Category ``NRC.''
Compatibility is not required for Category ``NRC'' regulations. The NRC
program elements in this category are those that relate directly to
areas of regulation reserved to the NRC by the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended (AEA), or the provisions of the Title 10 of the Code
of Federal Regulations. Although an Agreement State may not adopt
program elements reserved to NRC, it may wish to inform its licensees
of certain requirements via a mechanism that is consistent with the
particular State's administrative procedure laws, but does not confer
regulatory authority on the State.
c Energy Act of
1954, as amended (AEA), or the provisions of the Title 10 of the Code
of Federal Regulations. Although an Agreement State may not adopt
program elements reserved to NRC, it may wish to inform its licensees
of certain requirements via a mechanism that is consistent with the
particular State's administrative procedure laws, but does not confer
regulatory authority on the State.

Paperwork Reduction Act Statement

This proposed rule does not contain a new or amended information
collection requirement subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing requirements were approved by the
Office of Management and Budget, approval number 3150-0132.

Public Protection Notification

If a means to impose an information collection does not display a
currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.

Voluntary Consensus Standards

The National Technology Transfer Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-113)
requires that Federal agencies use technical standards that are
developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies unless the
use of such a standard is inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. In this proposed rule, the NRC would add the Transnuclear
TN-68 cask system to the list of NRC approved casks for spent fuel
storage in 10 CFR 72.214. This action does not constitute the
establishment of a standard that establishes generally-applicable
requirements.

Plain Language

The Presidential Memorandum dated June 1, 1998, entitled ``Plain
Language in Government Writing,'' directed that the Government's
writing be in plain language. The NRC requests comments on this
proposed rule specifically with respect to the clarity and
effectiveness of the language used. Comments should be sent to the
address listed under the heading ADDRESSES above.

Regulatory Analysis
ge

The Presidential Memorandum dated June 1, 1998, entitled ``Plain
Language in Government Writing,'' directed that the Government's
writing be in plain language. The NRC requests comments on this
proposed rule specifically with respect to the clarity and
effectiveness of the language used. Comments should be sent to the
address listed under the heading ADDRESSES above.

Regulatory Analysis

On July 18, 1990 (55 FR 29181), the NRC issued an amendment to 10
CFR part 72 to provide for the storage of spent nuclear fuel under a
general license. Any nuclear power reactor licensee can use NRC-
certified casks to store spent nuclear fuel if it notifies the NRC in
advance, spent fuel is stored under the conditions specified in the

cask's CoC, and the conditions of the general license are met. In that
rule, four spent fuel storage casks were approved for use at reactor
sites and were listed in 10 CFR 72.214. That rule envisioned that
storage casks certified in the future could be added to the listing in
10 CFR 72.214 through rulemaking procedures. Procedures and criteria
for obtaining NRC approval of new spent fuel storage cask designs were
provided in 10 CFR part 72, subpart L. Subsequently, additional casks
have been added to the listing in 10 CFR 72.214.
The alternative to this proposed action is not to certify these new
designs and give a site-specific license to each utility that proposes
to use the casks. This would cost the NRC more time and money for site-
specific reviews. Using site-specific reviews would ignore the
procedures and criteria currently in place for the addition of new cask
designs and would be in conflict with the NWPA direction to the
Commission to approve technologies for the use of spent fuel storage at
the sites of civilian nuclear power reactors without, to the extent
practicable, the need for additional site reviews
broad to encompass multiple nuclear power plant
sites in the United States without the need for further site-specific
approval by NRC. Vendors with cask designs already listed may be
adversely impacted because power reactor licensees may choose a newly
listed design over an existing one. However, the NRC is required by its
regulations and the NWPA direction to certify and list approved casks.
This proposed rule would have no significant identifiable impact or
benefit on other Government agencies.
Based on the above discussion of the benefits and impacts of the
alternatives, the NRC concludes that the requirements of the proposed
rule are commensurate with the NRC's responsibilities for public health
and safety and the common defense and security. No other available
alternative is believed to be as satisfactory, and thus, this action is
recommended.

Regulatory Flexibility Certification

In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C.
605(b)), the NRC certifies that this rule will not, if promulgated,
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule affects only the licensing and operation
of nuclear power plants, independent spent fuel storage facilities, and
cask vendors. The companies that own these plants do not fall within
the scope of the definition of ``small entities'' set forth in the
Regulatory Flexibility Act or the Small Business Size Standards set out
in regulations issued by the Small Business Administration at 13 CFR
part 121.

Backfit Analysis

The NRC has determined that the backfit rule (10 CFR 50.109 or 10
CFR 72.62) does not apply to this proposed rule because this amendment
does not involve any provisions that would impose backfits as defined
in the backfit rule. Therefore, a backfit analysis is not required.

List of Subjects In 10 CFR Part 72
s issued by the Small Business Administration at 13 CFR
part 121.

Backfit Analysis

The NRC has determined that the backfit rule (10 CFR 50.109 or 10
CFR 72.62) does not apply to this proposed rule because this amendment
does not involve any provisions that would impose backfits as defined
in the backfit rule. Therefore, a backfit analysis is not required.

List of Subjects In 10 CFR Part 72

Criminal penalties, Manpower training programs, Nuclear materials,
Occupational safety and health, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, Spent fuel.

For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization
Act of 1974, as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 553; the NRC is proposing to
adopt the following amendments to 10 CFR Part 72.

PART 72--LICENSING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INDEPENDENT STORAGE OF
SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL AND HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE

1. The authority citation for part 72 continues to read as follows:

Authority: Secs. 51, 53, 57, 62, 63, 65, 69, 81, 161, 182, 183,
184, 186, 187, 189, 68 Stat. 929, 930, 932, 933, 934, 935, 948, 953,
954, 955, as amended, sec. 234, 83 Stat. 444, as amended (42 U.S.C.
2071, 2073, 2077, 2092, 2093, 2095, 2099, 2111, 2201, 2232, 2233,
2234, 2236, 2237, 2238, 2282); sec. 274, Pub. L. 86-373, 73 Stat.
688, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2021); sec. 201, as amended, 202, 206, 88
Stat. 1242, as amended, 1244, 1246 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842, 5846);
Pub. L. 95-601, sec. 10, 92 Stat. 2951 as amended by Pub. L. 10d--
48b, sec. 7902, 10b Stat. 31b3 (42 U.S.C. 5851); sec. 102, Pub. L.
91-190, 83 Stat. 853 (42 U.S.C. 4332); secs. 131, 132, 133, 135,
137, 141, Pub. L. 97-425, 96 Stat. 2229, 2230, 2232, 2241, sec. 148,
Pub. L. 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330-235 (42 U.S.C. 10151, 10152, 10153,
10155, 10157, 10161, 10168).
Section 72.44(g) also issued under secs. 142(b) and 148(c), (d),
Pub. L. 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330-232, 1330-236 (42 U.S.C. 10162(b),
10168(c),(d))
ec. 102, Pub. L.
91-190, 83 Stat. 853 (42 U.S.C. 4332); secs. 131, 132, 133, 135,
137, 141, Pub. L. 97-425, 96 Stat. 2229, 2230, 2232, 2241, sec. 148,
Pub. L. 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330-235 (42 U.S.C. 10151, 10152, 10153,
10155, 10157, 10161, 10168).
Section 72.44(g) also issued under secs. 142(b) and 148(c), (d),
Pub. L. 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330-232, 1330-236 (42 U.S.C. 10162(b),
10168(c),(d)). Section 72.46 also issued under sec. 189, 68 Stat.
955 (42 U.S.C. 2239); sec. 134, Pub. L. 97-425, 96 Stat. 2230 (42
U.S.C. 10154). Section 72.96(d) also issued under sec. 145(g), Pub.
L. 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330-235 (42 U.S.C. 10165(g)). Subpart J also
issued under secs. 2(2), 2(15), 2(19), 117(a), 141(h), Pub. L. 97-
425, 96 Stat. 2202, 2203, 2204, 2222, 2244, (42 U.S.C. 10101,
10137(a), 10161(h)). Subparts K and L are also issued under sec.
133, 98 Stat. 2230 (42 U.S.C. 10153) and sec. 218(a), 96 Stat. 2252
(42 U.S.C. 10198).

2. In Sec. 72.214, Certificate of Compliance 1027 is added to read
as follows:

Sec. 72.214 List of approved spent fuel storage casks.

* * * * *
Certificate Number: 1027
SAR Submitted by: Transnuclear, Inc.
SAR Title: Final Safety Analysis Report for the TN-68 Dry Storage
Cask
Docket Number: 72-1027
Certification Expiration Date: [insert 20 years after the effective
date of the final rule] Model Number: TN-68
* * * * *
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of August, 1999.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
William D. Travers,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 99-21798 Filed 8-20-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P

## Nearby sections

- [64 FR 58 Organization and Operations of Federal Credit Unions; Fidelity Bond and Insurance Coverage for Federal Credit Unions; Requirements for Insurance](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_98-34031.md)
- [64 FR 61 Pay-Per-Call Rule](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_98-34408.md)
- [64 FR 435 Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace Model BAC 1-11 200 and 400 Series Airplanes](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-49.md)
- [64 FR 465 Threatened Fish and Wildlife; Listing of the Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy Population of Harbor Porpoise as Threatened Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-138.md)
- [64 FR 820 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Illinois](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-228.md)
- [64 FR 1159 Refugee Resettlement Program: Requirements for the Public/Private Partnership Program for Refugee Cash Assistance; and Refugee Medical Assistance](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-202.md)
- [64 FR 1542 List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: Addition](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-505.md)
- [64 FR 1545 Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Clothes Washer Energy Conservation Standards](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-540.md)
- [64 FR 1549 Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737 Series Airplanes](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-481.md)
- [64 FR 1552 Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney JT9D Series Turbofan Engines](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-492.md)
- [64 FR 1560 Proposed Modification of Class E Airspace; Port Clinton, OH](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-499.md)
- [64 FR 1565 Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Steubenville, OH](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-494.md)
- [64 FR 1585 Great Lakes Pilotage Regulations](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-126.md)
- [64 FR 1763 Protected Area Permits for New Withdrawals; Proposed Amendments to the Commission's Ground Water Protected Area Regulations for Southeastern Pennsylvania; Public Hearing](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-670.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-21798. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.
