# 64 FR 42619: California Olives; Section 610 Review > Federal · Regulations · In force URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-20169 ## Section - **Citation:** 64 FR 42619 - **Heading:** California Olives; Section 610 Review - **Jurisdiction:** Federal - **Kind:** Regulations - **Status:** In force - **Text as of:** August 14, 2026 - **Source:** Compiled text - **Location:** Federal Register / Vol. 64 / 64 FR 42619 ## Text Proposed Rules Federal Register ________________________________________________________________________ ======================================================================== Proposed Rules ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 932 [Docket No. FV99-932-610 REVIEW] California Olives; Section 610 Review AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice of review and request for comments. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This action announces the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) review of Marketing Order 932 for olives grown in California, under the criteria contained in section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). DATES: Written comments on this notice must be received by October 4, 1999. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this notice of review. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, Room 2525-S, Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456; Fax: (202) 720-5698; or E-mail: [email protected]. All comments should reference the docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be made available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kurt Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, Suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721; telephone: (209) 487-5901; Fax: (209) 487-5906; E-mail: Kurt.K[email protected]; or George Kelhart, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, room 2525-S, PO Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone: (202) 720-2491; Fax: (202) 720-5698; E-mail: George.K[email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Marketing Order No. 932, as amended (7 CFR Part 932), regulates the handling of olives grown in California. The marketing order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (AMAA), as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674). AMS published in the Federal Register (63 FR 8014; February 18, 1999), its plan to review certain regulations, including Marketing Order No. 932, under criteria contained in section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA; 5 U.S.C. 601-612). Because many AMS regulations impact small entities, AMS decided, as a matter of policy, to review certain regulations which, although they may not meet the threshold requirement under section 610 of the RFA, warrant review. The February 18 notice stated that AMS would list the regulations to be reviewed in AMS' regulatory agenda which is published in the Federal Register as part of the Unified Agenda. However, after further consideration, AMS has decided to announce the reviews in the Federal Register separate from the Unified Agenda. Accordingly, this notice and request for comments is made for California olives. The purpose of the review will be to determine whether the California marketing order for olives should be continued without change, amended, or rescinded (consistent with the objectives of the AMAA) to minimize the impacts on small entities. In conducting this review, AMS will consider the following factors: (1) The continued need for the marketing order; (2) the nature of complaints or comments received from the public concerning the marketing order; (3) the complexity of the marketing order; (4) the extent to which the marketing order overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal rules, and, to the extent feasible, with State and local governmental rules; and (5) the length of time since the marketing order has been evaluated or the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the area affected by the marketing order. Written comments, views, opinions, and other information regarding the olive marketing order's impact on small businesses are invited. Dated: July 27, 1999. Robert C. Keeney, Deputy Administrator, Fruit and Vegetable Programs. [FR Doc. 99-20169 Filed 8-4-99; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-02-P ## Nearby sections - [64 FR 58 Organization and Operations of Federal Credit Unions; Fidelity Bond and Insurance Coverage for Federal Credit Unions; Requirements for Insurance](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_98-34031.md) - [64 FR 61 Pay-Per-Call Rule](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_98-34408.md) - [64 FR 435 Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace Model BAC 1-11 200 and 400 Series Airplanes](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-49.md) - [64 FR 443 Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Aircraft Company Models C90A, B200, B200C, B200T, B200CT, 300, B300, B300C, and A200CT Airplanes](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-44.md) - [64 FR 447 Proposed Modification of Class D Airspace and Class E Airspace and Establishment of Class E Airspace; Rapid City, SD](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-83.md) - [64 FR 465 Threatened Fish and Wildlife; Listing of the Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy Population of Harbor Porpoise as Threatened Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-138.md) - [64 FR 628 Labor Condition Applications and Requirements for Employers Using Nonimmigrants on H-1B Visas in Specialty Occupations and as Fashion Models; Labor Certification Process for Permanent Employment of Aliens in the United States](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_98-34668.md) - [64 FR 1003 Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes Florida: Redesignation of the Duval County Sulfur Dioxide Unclassifiable Area to Attainment](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-230.md) - [64 FR 1157 Certain Plant Regulators: Cytokinins, Auxins, Gibberellins, Ethylene, and Pelargonic Acid; Tolerance Exemptions](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-429.md) - [64 FR 1542 List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: Addition](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-505.md) - [64 FR 1545 Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 Series Airplanes](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-482.md) - [64 FR 1560 Proposed Modification of Class E Airspace; Port Clinton, OH](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-499.md) - [64 FR 1585 Great Lakes Pilotage Regulations](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-126.md) - [64 FR 1786 Fixed Satellite Service and Terrestrial System in the Ku-Band](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-578.md) --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-20169. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.