# 64 FR 36828: Pennsylvania Regulatory Program > Federal · Regulations · In force URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-17295 ## Section - **Citation:** 64 FR 36828 - **Heading:** Pennsylvania Regulatory Program - **Jurisdiction:** Federal - **Kind:** Regulations - **Status:** In force - **Text as of:** August 14, 2026 - **Source:** Compiled text - **Location:** Federal Register / Vol. 64 / 64 FR 36828 ## Text nt limits established by best professional judgement. The amendment is intended to revise the State program to be consistent with the counterpart Federal provisions. DATES: Written comments must be received by 4:00 p.m. on July 23, 1999. ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed or hand-delivered to Mr. Robert J. Biggi, Director, Harrisburg Field Office at the first address listed below. Copies of the Pennsylvania program, the proposed amendment, and all written comments received in response to this notice will be available for public review at the addresses listed below during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Harrisburg Field Office, Third Floor, Suite 3C, Harrisburg Transportation Center, 415 Market Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101, Telephone: (717) 782- 4036. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Mining and Reclamation, Rachel Carson State Office Building, Post Office Box 8461, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105-8461, Telephone: (717) 787-5103. Each requester may receive, free of charge, one copy of the proposed amendment by contacting the OSM Harrisburg Field Office. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert J. Biggi, Director Harrisburg Field Office, Telephone: (717) 782-4036. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background on the Pennsylvania Program On July 30, 1982, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved the Pennsylvania program. Background on the Pennsylvania program, including the Secretary's findings and the disposition of comments, can be found in the July 30, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR 33079). Subsequent actions concerning the Pennsylvania program amendments are identified at 30 CFR 938.15. II. Discussion of the Proposed Amendment the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved the Pennsylvania program. Background on the Pennsylvania program, including the Secretary's findings and the disposition of comments, can be found in the July 30, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR 33079). Subsequent actions concerning the Pennsylvania program amendments are identified at 30 CFR 938.15. II. Discussion of the Proposed Amendment The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) submitted a proposed amendment to its program pursuant to remining and reclamation, postmining discharges, and water supply protection/ replacement in a letter dated December 18, 1998 (Administrative Record No. PA-853.01). This proposed amendment was published in the Federal Register on March 12, 1999 (64 FR 12269). The comment period for this proposal closed on April 12, 1999. During OSM's review of this proposal, PADEP submitted changes to supplement the original submission. These changes were described in a letter dated June 1, 1999 (Administrative Record No. 853.11). In that letter, PADEP indicated that the December 18, 1998, submission proposed to remove approved program language in 25 PA Code Chapters 87-90 dealing with effluent limits for discharges from areas disturbed by coal mining activities. The deletion of the definitions of the term ``best professional judgement'' from 25 PA Code 87.202 and 88.502 and deletion of 25 PA Code 87.207(b) and 88.507(b) are a supplement to this proposal. OSM is opening the public comment period to allow comment on these additional proposed deletions to the approved Pennsylvania program. III. Public Comment Procedures rbed by coal mining activities. The deletion of the definitions of the term ``best professional judgement'' from 25 PA Code 87.202 and 88.502 and deletion of 25 PA Code 87.207(b) and 88.507(b) are a supplement to this proposal. OSM is opening the public comment period to allow comment on these additional proposed deletions to the approved Pennsylvania program. III. Public Comment Procedures In accordance with the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), OSM is now seeking comments on the proposed amendments identified above. Specifically, OSM is seeking comments on the proposed changes to Pennsylvania's regulations that were submitted on June 1, 1999 (Administrative Record No. PA-853.11). Comments should address whether the proposed changes satisfy the applicable program approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If the amendment is deemed adequate, it will become part of the Pennsylvania program. Written Comments Written comments should be specific, pertain only to the issues proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support of the commenter's recommendations. Comments received after the time indicated under DATES or at locations other than the Harrisburg Field Office will not necessarily be considered in the final rulemaking or included in the Administrative Record. IV. Procedural Determinations Executive Order 12866 This proposed rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review). Executive Order 12988 under DATES or at locations other than the Harrisburg Field Office will not necessarily be considered in the final rulemaking or included in the Administrative Record. IV. Procedural Determinations Executive Order 12866 This proposed rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review). Executive Order 12988 The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) and has determined that, to the extent allowed by law, this rule meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual language of State regulatory programs and program amendments since each such program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments submitted by the States must be based solely on a determination of whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have been met. National Environmental Policy Act No environmental impact statement is required for this rule since section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). Paperwork Reduction Act This rule does not contain information collection requirements that require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507 et seq.). Regulatory Flexibility Act roposed State regulatory program provisions do not constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). Paperwork Reduction Act This rule does not contain information collection requirements that require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507 et seq.). Regulatory Flexibility Act The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal which is the subject of this rule is based upon corresponding Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In making the determination as to whether this rule would have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and assumptions in the analyses for the corresponding Federal regulations. Unfunded Mandates This rule will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any given year on any governmental entity or the private sector. List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 938 Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining. Dated: June 30, 1999. Allen D, Klein, Regional Director, Appalachian Regional Coordinating Center. [FR Doc. 99-17295 Filed 7-7-99; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-05-P ## Nearby sections - [64 FR 58 Organization and Operations of Federal Credit Unions; Fidelity Bond and Insurance Coverage for Federal Credit Unions; Requirements for Insurance](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_98-34031.md) - [64 FR 61 Pay-Per-Call Rule](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_98-34408.md) - [64 FR 435 Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace Model BAC 1-11 200 and 400 Series Airplanes](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-49.md) - [64 FR 443 Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Aircraft Company Models C90A, B200, B200C, B200T, B200CT, 300, B300, B300C, and A200CT Airplanes](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-44.md) - [64 FR 447 Proposed Modification of Class D Airspace and Class E Airspace and Establishment of Class E Airspace; Rapid City, SD](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-83.md) - [64 FR 465 Threatened Fish and Wildlife; Listing of the Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy Population of Harbor Porpoise as Threatened Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-138.md) - [64 FR 628 Labor Condition Applications and Requirements for Employers Using Nonimmigrants on H-1B Visas in Specialty Occupations and as Fashion Models; Labor Certification Process for Permanent Employment of Aliens in the United States](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_98-34668.md) - [64 FR 1003 Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes Florida: Redesignation of the Duval County Sulfur Dioxide Unclassifiable Area to Attainment](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-230.md) - [64 FR 1157 Certain Plant Regulators: Cytokinins, Auxins, Gibberellins, Ethylene, and Pelargonic Acid; Tolerance Exemptions](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-429.md) - [64 FR 1542 List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: Addition](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-505.md) - [64 FR 1545 Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 Series Airplanes](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-482.md) - [64 FR 1560 Proposed Modification of Class E Airspace; Port Clinton, OH](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-499.md) - [64 FR 1585 Great Lakes Pilotage Regulations](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-126.md) - [64 FR 1786 Fixed Satellite Service and Terrestrial System in the Ku-Band](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-578.md) --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_99-17295. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.