# 60 FR 19193: Kentucky Regulatory Program

> Federal · Regulations · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_95-9388

## Section

- **Citation:** 60 FR 19193
- **Heading:** Kentucky Regulatory Program
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Regulations
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** Federal Register / Vol. 60 / 60 FR 19193

## Text

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 917

[KY-208]

Kentucky Regulatory Program

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening and extension of public comment period
on proposed amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSM is announcing receipt of revisions pertaining to a
previously proposed amendment to the Kentucky regulatory program
(hereinafter, the ``Kentucky program'') under the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The revisions for
Kentucky's proposed rules pertain to documents, assessment of civil
penalties, and revegetation for surface and underground mining. This
amendment is intended to revise the Kentucky program to be consistent
with the corresponding Federal regulations.

DATES: Written comments must be received by 4:00 p.m., E.D.T., May 2,
1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed or hand delivered to Mr.
William J. Kovacic at the address listed below.
Copies of the Kentucky program, the proposed amendment, and all
written comments received in response to this document will be
available for public review at the addresses listed below during normal
business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. Each
requester may receive one free copy of the proposed amendment by
contacting OSM's Lexington Field Office.

Mr. William J. Kovacic, Lexington Field Office, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 2675 Regency Road, Lexington,
Kentucky 40503, Telephone: (606) 233-2896'
Department for Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, #2 Hudson
Hollow Complex, Frankfort, Kentucky 40601, Telephone: (502) 564-6940.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William J. Kovacic, Director, Lexington Field Office, Telephone: (606)
233-2896.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background on the Kentucky Program
t, 2675 Regency Road, Lexington,
Kentucky 40503, Telephone: (606) 233-2896'
Department for Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, #2 Hudson
Hollow Complex, Frankfort, Kentucky 40601, Telephone: (502) 564-6940.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William J. Kovacic, Director, Lexington Field Office, Telephone: (606)
233-2896.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background on the Kentucky Program

On May 18, 1982, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally
approved the Kentucky program. General background information on the
Kentucky program, including the Secretary's findings, the disposition
of comments, and the conditions of approval of the Kentucky program can
be found in the May 18, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR 21404).
Subsequent actions concerning Kentucky's program and program amendments
can be found at 30 CFR 917.11, 917.15, 917.16, and 917.17.

II. Description of the Proposed Amendment

By letter dated July 19, 1994, Kentucky submitted a proposed
amendment to its program pursuant to SMCRA (Administrative Record No.
1304). Kentucky submitted the proposed amendment at its own initiative.
The provisions of the Kentucky Administration Regulations (KAR)
Kentucky proposed to amend were: 405 KAR 7:015--Documents Incorporated
by Reference, 405 KAR 7:095--Assessment of Civil Penalties, 405 KAR
10:010--General Requirements for Performance Bond and Liability
Insurance, 405 KAR 16:020--Contemporaneous Reclamation, 405 KAR
16:200--Revegetation for Surface Coal Mining, and 405 KAR 18:200--
Revegetation for Underground Mining Operations.
OSM announced receipt of the proposed amendment in the August 9,
1994, Federal Register (59 FR 40503), provided an opportunity for a
public hearing or meeting on its substantive adequacy, and invited
public comment on its adequacy (Administrative Record No. 1322).
Because no one requested a public hearing or meeting, none was held.
The public comment period ended on September 8, 1994
all intersperse the fields with tree, hedges, or fence rows
throughout the harvested area to break up large blocks of monoculture
and to diversify habitat types for birds and other animals.'' Proposed
section 5(2)(b)2 is being revised to specifically identify the
``Kentucky Agricultural Statistics'' documents being relied upon
(except for prime farmland) for average county yields of row crops.
Proposed section 6 is being revised to reduce the stocking rates for
trees from 450 to 300 plants per acre, and to require all permit
applications submitted after February 22, 1995, which propose to plant
trees and shrubs for wildlife habitat, to use species listed in
Appendix A of New Technical Reclamation Memorandum #21
and stocking densities set in section 6(2)(b)1, or optionally to use
species and stocking densities recommended specifically for the permit
area by the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources.
Sections 9(3)(c) and 9(6), regarding use of productivity test areas
rather than statistical evaluation of productivity, are being deleted.

III. Public Comment Procedures

Written Comments

OSM is reopening the comment period on the proposed Kentucky
program amendment to provide the public an opportunity to reconsider
the adequacy of the proposed amendment in light of the additional
materials submitted. In accordance with the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), OSM is seeking comments on whether the proposed amendment
satisfies the applicable program approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If
the amendment is deemed adequate, it will become part of the Kentucky
program.
Written comments should be specific, pertain only to the issues
proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support of the
commenter's recommendations. Comments received after the time indicated
under DATES or at locations other than the Lexington Field Office will
not necessarily be considered in the final rulemaking or included in
the administrative record.

IV. Procedural Determinations
mments should be specific, pertain only to the issues
proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support of the
commenter's recommendations. Comments received after the time indicated
under DATES or at locations other than the Lexington Field Office will
not necessarily be considered in the final rulemaking or included in
the administrative record.

IV. Procedural Determinations

Executive Order 12866

This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review).
Executive Order 12778

The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by Section 2 of Executive Order 12778 (Civil Justice Reform) and has
determined that this rule meets the applicable standards of subsections
(a) and (b) of that section. However, these standards are not
applicable to the actual language of State regulatory programs and
program amendments since each such program is drafted and promulgated
by a specific State, not by OSM. Under Sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA
(30 U.S.C. 1253 and 12550) and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State
regulatory programs and program amendments submitted by the States must
be based solely on a determination of whether the submittal is
consistent with SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and
whether the other requirements of 30 CRR parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.

National Environmental Policy Act

No environmental impact statement is required for this rule since
Section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of Section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).

Paperwork Reduction Act
National Environmental Policy Act

No environmental impact statement is required for this rule since
Section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of Section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).

Paperwork Reduction Act

This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal that is the subject of this rule is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements
previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In
making the determination as to whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and
assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.

List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 917

Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.

Dated: April 10, 1995.
Richard J. Seibel,
Acting Assistant Director, Eastern Support Center.
[FR Doc. 95-9388 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-M

## Nearby sections

- [60 FR 82 Excise Tax On Self-Dealing By Private Foundations.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_94-31666.md)
- [60 FR 89 Proposed Tolerance Revocation for Folpet; Extension of Comment Period and Request for Additional Information](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_94-32285.md)
- [60 FR 2033 Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes Equipped With General Electric Model CF6-80C2 Series Engines or Pratt & Whitney Model PW4000 Series Engines](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_95-307.md)
- [60 FR 2043 Proposed Modification of Class D Airspace Areas; Detroit, MI, and Alton, IL](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_95-364.md)
- [60 FR 2067 Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; VOC RACT Catch-ups and Stage I Vapor Recovery](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_95-287.md)
- [60 FR 2070 Listing Endangered and Threatened Species; Shortnose Sturgeon in the Kennebec River System (Maine)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_95-275.md)
- [60 FR 2364 Anchorage Regulations; Regulated Navigation Areas and Limited Access Areas (CGD 86-079)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_95-435.md)
- [60 FR 2365 Cable Compulsory License: Notice of Inquiry Regarding Merger of Cable Systems and Individual Pricing of Broadcast Signals](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_95-439.md)
- [60 FR 2563 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision, Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) and San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_95-521.md)
- [60 FR 2727 Acquisition Regulation; Acquisition and Use of Environmentally Preferable Products and Services](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_95-681.md)
- [60 FR 2910 Collection of Debts by Tax Refund Offset](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_95-776.md)
- [60 FR 3185 Designation of Lightering Zones](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_95-947.md)
- [60 FR 3189 Independent Nail Superfund Site Notice of Intent to Delete; National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_95-826.md)
- [60 FR 3585 Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Model F28 Mark 0100 Series Airplanes](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_95-1133.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_95-9388. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.
