# 66 FR 45516: Migratory Bird Hunting; Proposed Frameworks for Late-Season Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations

> Federal · Regulations · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_01-21654

## Section

- **Citation:** 66 FR 45516
- **Heading:** Migratory Bird Hunting; Proposed Frameworks for Late-Season Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Regulations
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** Federal Register / Vol. 66 / 66 FR 45516

## Text

Part IV

Department of the Interior

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Fish and Wildlife Service

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

50 CFR Part 20

Migratory Bird Hunting; Proposed Frameworks for Late-Season Migratory
Bird Hunting Regulations; Proposed Rule

Proposed Rules

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 20

RIN 1018-AH79

Migratory Bird Hunting; Proposed Frameworks for Late-Season
Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; supplemental.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service (hereinafter Service or we) is
proposing to establish the 2001-02 late-season hunting regulations for
certain migratory game birds. We annually prescribe frameworks, or
outer limits, for dates and times when hunting may occur and the number
of birds that may be taken and possessed in late seasons. These
frameworks are necessary to allow State selections of seasons and
limits and to allow recreational harvest at levels compatible with
population and habitat conditions.

DATES: You must submit comments on the proposed migratory bird hunting
late-season frameworks by September 7, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Send your comments on these proposals to the Chief, Division
of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Department of the Interior, room 634-Arlington Square, 1849 C Street,
NW, Washington, DC 20240. All comments received, including names and
addresses, will become part of the public record. You may inspect
comments during normal business hours in room 634, Arlington Square
Building, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Andrew, Chief, or Ron W.
Kokel, Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, (703) 358-1714.
0. All comments received, including names and
addresses, will become part of the public record. You may inspect
comments during normal business hours in room 634, Arlington Square
Building, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Andrew, Chief, or Ron W.
Kokel, Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, (703) 358-1714.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulations Schedule for 2001

On April 30, 2001, we published in the Federal Register (66 FR
21298) a proposal to amend 50 CFR part 20. The proposal provided a
background and overview of the migratory bird hunting regulations
process, and dealt with the establishment of seasons, limits, and other
regulations for migratory game birds under Secs. 20.101 through 20.107,
20.109, and 20.110 of subpart K. On June 14, 2001, we published in the
Federal Register (66 FR 32297) a second document providing supplemental
proposals for early- and late-season migratory bird hunting regulations
frameworks and the proposed regulatory alternatives for the 2001-02
duck hunting season. The June 14 supplement also provided detailed
information on the 2001-02 regulatory schedule and announced the
Service Migratory Bird Regulations Committee (SRC) and Flyway Council
meetings.
On June 20-21, we held open meetings with the Flyway Council
Consultants at which the participants reviewed information on the
current status of migratory shore and upland game birds and developed
recommendations for the 2001-02 regulations for these species plus
regulations for migratory game birds in Alaska, Puerto Rico, and the
Virgin Islands, special September waterfowl seasons in designated
States, special sea duck seasons in the Atlantic Flyway, and extended
falconry seasons. In addition, we reviewed and discussed preliminary
information on the status of waterfowl as it relates to the development
and selection of the regulatory packages for the 2001-02 regular
waterfowl seasons
ds in Alaska, Puerto Rico, and the
Virgin Islands, special September waterfowl seasons in designated
States, special sea duck seasons in the Atlantic Flyway, and extended
falconry seasons. In addition, we reviewed and discussed preliminary
information on the status of waterfowl as it relates to the development
and selection of the regulatory packages for the 2001-02 regular
waterfowl seasons. On July 24, we published in the Federal Register (66
FR 38494) a third document specifically dealing with the proposed
frameworks for early-season regulations and the final regulatory
alternatives for the 2001-02 duck hunting season. We will publish a
rulemaking establishing final frameworks for early-season migratory
bird hunting regulations for the 2001-02 season in late August.
On August 1-2, 2001, we held open meetings with the Flyway Council
Consultants at which the participants reviewed the status of waterfowl
and developed recommendations for the 2001-02 regulations for these
species. This document deals specifically with proposed frameworks for
the late-season migratory bird hunting regulations. It will lead to
final frameworks from which States may select season dates, shooting
hours, areas, and limits.
We have considered all pertinent comments received through August
3, 2001, in developing this document. In addition, new proposals for
certain late-season regulations are provided for public comment.
Comment periods are specified above under DATES. We will publish final
regulatory frameworks for late-season migratory game bird hunting in
the Federal Register on or about September 25, 2001.

Population Status and Harvest

The following paragraphs provide a brief summary of information on
the status and harvest of waterfowl excerpted from various reports. For
more detailed information on methodologies and results, complete copies
of the various reports are available at the address indicated under the
caption ADDRESSES or from our website at http://migratorybirds.fws.gov.

Status of Ducks
ion Status and Harvest

The following paragraphs provide a brief summary of information on
the status and harvest of waterfowl excerpted from various reports. For
more detailed information on methodologies and results, complete copies
of the various reports are available at the address indicated under the
caption ADDRESSES or from our website at http://migratorybirds.fws.gov.

Status of Ducks

Federal, provincial, and State agencies conduct surveys each spring
to estimate the size of breeding populations and to evaluate the
conditions of the habitats. These surveys are conducted using fixed-
wing aircraft and encompass principal breeding areas of North America,
and cover over 2.0 million square miles. The Traditional survey area is
comprised of Alaska, Canada, and the northcentral U.S., and includes
approximately 1.3 million square miles. The Eastern survey area
includes parts of Ontario, Quebec, Labrador, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia,
Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, New York, and Maine, an area of
approximately 0.7 million square miles.
Habitat conditions in the traditional survey area were variable,
and the estimate of May ponds (U.S. and Prairie Canada combined) is up
(4.6 million 0.1 million, +18 percent) compared to 2000,
and slightly below (-6 percent), but not statistically different from
the long-term average. Continued drought produced fair to poor
conditions in most of Alberta, central and southern Saskatchewan, and
eastern Montana. By contrast, North and South Dakota generally had good
to excellent water conditions, with the best conditions in the eastern
portions of these States, and drier conditions to the north and west.
Nesting cover in the Dakotas was in above-average condition. Southern
Manitoba and extreme southeastern Saskatchewan have had higher than
normal water conditions for the past 2 years, and this water, along
with above-normal precipitation due to an early, snowy winter, produced
excellent habitat for breeding ducks
e eastern
portions of these States, and drier conditions to the north and west.
Nesting cover in the Dakotas was in above-average condition. Southern
Manitoba and extreme southeastern Saskatchewan have had higher than
normal water conditions for the past 2 years, and this water, along
with above-normal precipitation due to an early, snowy winter, produced
excellent habitat for breeding ducks. Average to above-average
precipitation also made for excellent wetland conditions across
northern Manitoba and Saskatchewan. The northernmost portion of Alberta
was the exception to the record drought and poor wetland conditions in
the rest of the province, as above-average winter and spring
precipitation filled nearly all available wetland basins. Good
conditions for breeding ducks prevailed in the Northwest Territories,
except for a small northern area that was rated only fair due to late
spring ice conditions that reduced available breeding habitat for
early-nesting species. Overall, conditions were good in the traditional
survey area, and

average to above-average waterfowl production is expected.
In Alaska, breeding conditions depend largely on the timing of
spring, as wetland conditions are less variable than on the prairies.
Although winter temperatures were mild, spring was late, and waterfowl
production will likely be below average to the north and west, and
average to the south and east.
In the eastern survey area, conditions were variable but generally
good. Southern Ontario and Northern New York had an early spring, and
with wetland basins nearly full, the outlook for breeding ducks is
good. Spring was also early in Quebec, with good to excellent habitat
in the central and northern portions. However, southern Quebec was
drier with conditions ranging from fair to poor. In Maine and the
Maritime provinces, spring was late, with lower than normal
temperatures, but above-average precipitation, and habitat conditions
were good
sins nearly full, the outlook for breeding ducks is
good. Spring was also early in Quebec, with good to excellent habitat
in the central and northern portions. However, southern Quebec was
drier with conditions ranging from fair to poor. In Maine and the
Maritime provinces, spring was late, with lower than normal
temperatures, but above-average precipitation, and habitat conditions
were good. Overall, eastern habitats were in good condition, with
average to above-average production expected.
The 2001 total duck population estimate for the traditional survey
area was 36.1 0.6 million birds, 14 percent below last
year's near-record estimate of 41.8 0.7 million birds, but
still 9 percent above the 1955-2000 average. Mallard abundance was 7.9
0.2 million, which is 17 percent below last year's
estimate but still 5 percent above the 1955-2000 average. Blue-winged
teal abundance was estimated at 5.8 0.3 million. This is
23 percent below last year's record estimate of 7.4 million, but 29
percent above the 1955-2000 average. Gadwall (2.7 0.1
million, +66 percent), green-winged teal (2.5 0.2 million,
+ 39 percent), and northern shovelers (3.3 0.2 million,
+60 percent) all remained above their long-term averages, while
American wigeon (2.5 0.1 million), redheads (0.7
0.07 million), and canvasbacks (0.6 0.05
million) did not differ from their long-term averages. Scaup (3.7
0.2 million, -31 percent) and northern pintail (3.3
0.3 million, -23 percent), were again below their long-
term average.
The 2001 total duck population estimate for the eastern survey area
was 3.3 0.2 million birds, similar to last year's estimate
of 3.2 0.3 million birds. Abundances of individual species
were similar to those of last year, with the exception of ring-necked
ducks (353.0 32 thousand, -43 percent) and buffleheads
(95.0 44 thousand, + 93 percent). Buffleheads, goldeneyes
and lesser scaup were above the 1996-2000 average in the east
. In the central Arctic, spring phenology
was near average. In much of the eastern Arctic, the Hudson Bay
Lowlands, and Ungava Peninsula, phenology appeared to be earlier than
average and nesting conditions for geese and swans generally were
favorable. Of the 27 populations for which current estimates were
available, 6 exhibited declines of more than 10 percent from previous
annual estimates. Ten populations (four resident populations of Canada
geese, cackling Canada geese, Western Central Flyway light geese,
greater snow geese, and both white-fronted goose populations) displayed
significant positive trends, and only Short Grass Prairie Canada geese
exhibited a significant negative trend over the most recent 10-year
period. Forecasts for production of young in 2001 varied regionally,
but generally will be reduced in the western areas and improved in the
eastern portions of North America.

Waterfowl Harvest and Hunter Activity

During the 2000-01 hunting season, duck stamp sales were slightly
above sales in 1999 (+1 percent), and hunter numbers remain well below
the highs observed during the early 1970s. U.S. waterfowl hunters
hunted about 4 percent fewer days and bagged about 4 percent fewer
ducks, 2 percent fewer geese and 58 percent fewer coots than in 1999.
The number of ducks harvested during the 2000-01 hunting season was
similar to the numbers that were harvested during the early 1970s. The
increased harvest during the last few years is a reflection of the more
liberal hunting seasons offered and the increased duck abundance
resulting from the improved water availability and habitat conditions
that occurred in the prairie-pothole area. Of the five species of ducks
that are most important in the bag, in order of importance: the number
of mallards harvested increased 3 percent; the number of green-winged
teal decreased 23 percent; the number of gadwall increased 16 percent;
the number of wood ducks decreased 18 percent; and the number of blue-
winged teal remained the same
conditions
that occurred in the prairie-pothole area. Of the five species of ducks
that are most important in the bag, in order of importance: the number
of mallards harvested increased 3 percent; the number of green-winged
teal decreased 23 percent; the number of gadwall increased 16 percent;
the number of wood ducks decreased 18 percent; and the number of blue-
winged teal remained the same.
The overall harvest of geese last year decreased 2 percent from
that of 2000-01. In the U.S., harvest of Canada geese increased 20
percent, snow geese decreased 49 percent, blue geese decreased 35
percent, Ross' geese decreased 66 percent, white-fronted geese
decreased 19 percent, and brant increased 64 percent from 1999-2000.
Increases in goose harvests over the last decade largely reflect the
increased numbers of resident or giant Canada geese, although increases
in other populations of Canada geese and other goose species, including
snow geese, have occurred.

Review of Public Comments and Flyway Council Recommendations

The preliminary proposed rulemaking, which appeared in the April 30
Federal Register, opened the public comment period for migratory game
bird hunting regulations. The supplemental proposed rule, which
appeared in the June 14 Federal Register, defined the public comment
period for the proposed regulatory alternatives for the 2001-02 duck
hunting season. The public comment period for the proposed regulatory
alternatives ended July 6, 2001. Late-season comments and comments
pertaining to the proposed alternatives are summarized below and
numbered in the order used in the April 30 Federal Register document.
We have included only the numbered items pertaining to late-season
issues and the proposed regulatory alternatives for which we received
written comments. Consequently, the issues do not follow in direct
numerical or alphabetical order.
We received recommendations from all four Flyway Councils. Some
recommendations supported continuation of last year's frameworks
0 Federal Register document.
We have included only the numbered items pertaining to late-season
issues and the proposed regulatory alternatives for which we received
written comments. Consequently, the issues do not follow in direct
numerical or alphabetical order.
We received recommendations from all four Flyway Councils. Some
recommendations supported continuation of last year's frameworks. Due
to the comprehensive nature of the annual review of the frameworks
performed by the Councils, support for continuation of last year's
frameworks is assumed for items for which no recommendations were
received. Council recommendations for changes in the frameworks are
summarized below.

We seek additional information and comments on the recommendations
in this supplemental proposed rule. New proposals and modifications to
previously described proposals are discussed below. Wherever possible,
they are discussed under headings corresponding to the numbered items
in the April 30, 2001, Federal Register document.

1. Ducks

Categories used to discuss issues related to duck harvest
management are: (A) Harvest Strategy Considerations, (B) Regulatory
Alternatives, (C) Zones and Split Seasons, and (D) Special Seasons/
Species Management. The categories correspond to previously published
issues/discussion, and only those containing substantial
recommendations are discussed below.

B. Regulatory Alternatives
1. Ducks

Categories used to discuss issues related to duck harvest
management are: (A) Harvest Strategy Considerations, (B) Regulatory
Alternatives, (C) Zones and Split Seasons, and (D) Special Seasons/
Species Management. The categories correspond to previously published
issues/discussion, and only those containing substantial
recommendations are discussed below.

B. Regulatory Alternatives

Council Recommendations: The Atlantic, Mississippi, Central, and
Pacific Flyway Councils recommended adoption of the ``liberal''
regulations package for duck hunting seasons in 2001-02.
Service Response: The original Adaptive Harvest Management (AHM)
protocol was based solely on the dynamics of midcontinent mallards, but
efforts to account for eastern and western mallard stocks are
progressing. For the 2001 hunting season, we recommend the
consideration of a regulatory alternative for the Atlantic Flyway that
depends exclusively on the status of eastern mallards. This arrangement
should remain provisional, however, until the management implications
of this approach are better understood. The recommended regulatory
alternative for the western three flyways should continue to depend
exclusively on the status of midcontinent mallards. The set of
regulatory alternatives for this year, including specification of
season lengths, bag limits, and framework dates, was finalized in the
July 24 Federal Register, with the finalization of the 2001-02
regulatory alternatives.
For the 2001-02 hunting season, we propose the ``liberal''
regulatory alternative (as described in the July 24 Federal Register)
for all Flyways, based on 8.7 million mallards, and 2.7 million ponds
in Prairie Canada, and 1.0 million eastern mallards.

D. Special Seasons/Species Management
inalized in the
July 24 Federal Register, with the finalization of the 2001-02
regulatory alternatives.
For the 2001-02 hunting season, we propose the ``liberal''
regulatory alternative (as described in the July 24 Federal Register)
for all Flyways, based on 8.7 million mallards, and 2.7 million ponds
in Prairie Canada, and 1.0 million eastern mallards.

D. Special Seasons/Species Management

i. Black Ducks
Council Recommendations: The Atlantic Flyway Council recommended
allowing States to increase the daily bag limit on black ducks to 2 per
day for 10 consecutive hunting days, provided the black duck season is
closed for an equivalent number of days. During the remainder of the
season, the black duck bag daily bag limit would be 1 bird per day.
Service Response: We remain concerned about the current level of
black duck populations and believe the best approach is to focus on the
International Harvest strategy that has not yet been completed. We
encourage the Atlantic and Mississippi Flyway Councils to work
cooperatively with the Service and Canada to develop and implement an
international harvest strategy as soon as possible so that
recommendations such as this may be evaluated in a broader context. In
the absence of this strategy, significant changes in harvest
regulations likely would complicate negotiations with Canada. Further,
we are uncertain that the proposed changes would not increase harvest.
We believe that the current level of harvest reduction on black ducks,
achieved since the 1983 Environmental Assessment, must be maintained.
ii. Canvasbacks
Council Recommendations: The Atlantic Flyway Council recommended
that the Canvasback Harvest Strategy be modified to allow for a limited
canvasback hunting season of 20 days in the Atlantic and Mississippi
Flyways, 25 days in the Central Flyway and 39 days in the Pacific
Flyway during the 2001-02 season, with a daily bag limit of one bird
per day
sessment, must be maintained.
ii. Canvasbacks
Council Recommendations: The Atlantic Flyway Council recommended
that the Canvasback Harvest Strategy be modified to allow for a limited
canvasback hunting season of 20 days in the Atlantic and Mississippi
Flyways, 25 days in the Central Flyway and 39 days in the Pacific
Flyway during the 2001-02 season, with a daily bag limit of one bird
per day. States can select these days during any time period within
their regular duck season.
The Mississippi and Pacific Flyway Councils recommended an open
canvasback season with a 1-bird daily bag limit for the entire duck
season in all four flyways for the 2001-02 season.
The Central Flyway Council recommended modifying the current
strategy and recommended two options for individual state selections.
First, allow a within-season closure for canvasbacks during the regular
duck hunting season. Season length (daily bag of 1, either sex) would
be determined by the AHM regulatory alternative when the harvest
predicted by the canvasback model is less than the allowable harvest.
For the 2001-2002 duck hunting season, the season length for
canvasbacks would be 39 days in the Central Flyway, 30 days in the
Atlantic and Mississippi Flyways, and 60 days in the Pacific Flyway.
States would be allowed to select days during any time period of the
regular duck hunting season within established criteria for zones and
splits. Second, offer an aggregate daily bag of 1 canvasback or 1
redhead for the entire length of the duck hunting season.
Service Response: Since 1994, the Service has followed a canvasback
harvest strategy that if population status and production are
sufficient to permit a harvest of one canvasback per day nationwide for
the entire length of the regular duck season, while attaining a spring
population objective of 500,000 birds, the season on canvasbacks should
be opened. Otherwise, the season on canvasbacks should be closed
nationwide
94, the Service has followed a canvasback
harvest strategy that if population status and production are
sufficient to permit a harvest of one canvasback per day nationwide for
the entire length of the regular duck season, while attaining a spring
population objective of 500,000 birds, the season on canvasbacks should
be opened. Otherwise, the season on canvasbacks should be closed
nationwide. This spring, the estimate of canvasback abundance was
580,000 birds and the number of ponds in Prairie Canada in May (2.7
million) was 20% below the long-term average. The size of the spring
population, together with natural mortality and below-average expected
production due to the relatively dry conditions, is insufficient to
offset expected mortality associated with a canvasback season lasting
the entire length of the ``liberal'' regulatory alternative and still
attain the population objective of 500,000 canvasbacks in the spring of
2002.
We continue to support the harvest strategy and the model adopted
in 1994. However, despite reduced numbers and below-average production
forecast this year, we believe there is still some opportunity to allow
a limited harvest this fall without compromising the population's
ability to reach 500,000 canvasbacks next spring. Thus, we propose a
very restrictive, shortened season for canvasbacks for the 2001-02
season. In the Atlantic and Mississippi Flyways, the season length
would be 20 days, in the Central Flyway, 25 days, and in the Pacific
Flyway, 38 days. The days for this limited season must be used
consecutively. Our objective in making this proposal is to provide some
hunting opportunity but still assure that the spring population will
remain above the 500,000 objective level.
Over the next year, we are willing to discuss the possibility of
revising the strategy
e 20 days, in the Central Flyway, 25 days, and in the Pacific
Flyway, 38 days. The days for this limited season must be used
consecutively. Our objective in making this proposal is to provide some
hunting opportunity but still assure that the spring population will
remain above the 500,000 objective level.
Over the next year, we are willing to discuss the possibility of
revising the strategy. Because the population model has performed
relatively well to date, we believe that the most productive area for
discussion involves subjective aspects of the strategy, such as the
setting of population objectives. Any proposed changes should have
broad-based support and reflect the interests of all stakeholders.
However, we emphasize that discontent with the canvasback strategy this
year is symptomatic of difficulties associated with the larger issue of
multi-stock management in the existing AHM framework. For example, how
should hunting seasons be designed to

accommodate species' varying abilities to support harvest, when all
species are subjected to a common sport harvest? We urge the Flyway
Councils to begin internal discussions toward a strategic, long-term
view regarding approaches to this and other critical harvest-management
issues. Such discussions, complemented by ongoing work by the AHM
working group, will be useful as we begin the development of a new
Environmental Impact Statement for the sport hunting of migratory
birds.
Due to relative lateness of this development, the generally earlier
opening of duck seasons in Alaska (September 1), and the anticipated
level of harvest in Alaska, we propose to exempt Alaska from the
proposed shorter season length. However, we believe that Alaska should
fully engage in review of population objectives and remain a part of
the overall harvest strategy for this species.
iii
.
Due to relative lateness of this development, the generally earlier
opening of duck seasons in Alaska (September 1), and the anticipated
level of harvest in Alaska, we propose to exempt Alaska from the
proposed shorter season length. However, we believe that Alaska should
fully engage in review of population objectives and remain a part of
the overall harvest strategy for this species.
iii. Pintails
Council Recommendations: All four Flyway Councils recommended a
daily bag limit of one pintail in the 2001-02 hunting season as
prescribed by the Interim Pintail Harvest Strategy.
Service Response: We propose to continue use of the interim harvest
strategy for a fifth year. Considering the current status of the
population (3.3 million breeding birds) and the expected recruitment
rate (1.01), the strategy prescribes a bag limit of 1 pintail for all
Flyways under the ``liberal'' alternative.
Further, we propose that the interim strategy be revised for future
years by adjusting the equations used to predict pintail harvest to
more accurately reflect realized harvest based on the experience gained
during the past four years. The proposed method of adjustment, as well
as a brief review of the first four years of interim strategy, will be
provided to the Technical Sections for their review and comment. The
interim strategy would be used until the development and adoption of a
direct methodology for incorporation of pintails into the formal AHM
process. We believe that such an action may be possible by the 2002-03
hunting season, but several issue remain to be resolved as described in
this year's AHM report. Recognizing that some of these issues may not
be resolved by next year, we believe that adjustment to the existing
interim strategy is a prudent step, and intend to employ the interim
strategy until formal incorporation of pintail harvest into the
existing AHM process is accomplished.
iv
e 2002-03
hunting season, but several issue remain to be resolved as described in
this year's AHM report. Recognizing that some of these issues may not
be resolved by next year, we believe that adjustment to the existing
interim strategy is a prudent step, and intend to employ the interim
strategy until formal incorporation of pintail harvest into the
existing AHM process is accomplished.
iv. Scaup
Council Recommendations: The Atlantic, Mississippi, and Central
Flyway Councils recommended a daily bag limit of three scaup for the
2001-02 hunting season.
The Pacific Flyway Council recommended a daily bag limit of four
scaup in the Pacific Flyway for the 2001-02 hunting season.
Service Response: In 1999, we restricted the bag limit of scaup to
three in the Atlantic, Mississippi, and Central Flyways and four in the
Pacific Flyway. It is still too early to judge the effects of the
harvest restriction with only two years' data. This year, we propose
that the restrictions put in place 2 years ago continue. We note that
last year, the lesser scaup immature/adult ratio, a measure of annual
production, was the lowest on record; we remain concerned about the
status of this species and ask the Flyway Councils to direct their
technical committees to continue dialog with us, building toward a
strategy to guide the harvest management of this species.

4. Canada Geese

Council Recommendations: The Atlantic Flyway Council made a number
of recommendations regarding Canada geese. For Atlantic Population (AP)
Canada geese, the Council recommended expansion of regular seasons to
move toward a 10 percent harvest rate on adult AP geese over the 2001-
2002 season. This would allow for a 30-day season with a 2-bird daily
bag limit in AP areas of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New
England and for 30-day seasons with a 1-bird daily limit in AP areas of
Maryland, Delaware and Virginia except for Back Bay
geese, the Council recommended expansion of regular seasons to
move toward a 10 percent harvest rate on adult AP geese over the 2001-
2002 season. This would allow for a 30-day season with a 2-bird daily
bag limit in AP areas of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New
England and for 30-day seasons with a 1-bird daily limit in AP areas of
Maryland, Delaware and Virginia except for Back Bay. The regular season
would remain closed in Back Bay, Virginia and the Northeast Hunt Unit
in North Carolina. Recommended framework dates in New York, New Jersey,
Pennsylvania, and New England would be the last Saturday in October to
January 20; while in Maryland, Delaware and Virginia, they would be
November 15 to January 20.
In North Carolina, the Council recommended allowing modification of
the boundary of the Northeast Hunt Unit, and, that North Carolina be
allowed to select a 50 day season with a 2 bird daily bag limit with
framework dates of October 1 to December 31 in its Southern James Bay
Population (SJBP) zone.
In North Atlantic Population (NAP) hunt areas, the Council
recommended a 45-day season with a 2 bird daily bag limit between
October 1 and January 20.
For resident populations, the Council recommended allowing regular
seasons designed to maximize harvest of Resident Population (RP) Canada
geese in designated areas of the Atlantic Flyway beginning in 2001. The
Council defined designated areas as accounting for no more than 10
percent of migrant geese (AP, NAP, SJBP) band recoveries during 1950-
1999 in any State, and collectively accounting for less than 5 percent
of all flyway recoveries of any migrant population. Regular seasons in
designated RP harvest areas of Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia,
would be 70 days, between November 15 and February 15, with a 5-bird
daily bag limit. In North Carolina, Massachusetts, and New York, the
framework would be 70 days between the last Saturday in October and
February 15, with a 5-bird daily bag limit
rcent
of all flyway recoveries of any migrant population. Regular seasons in
designated RP harvest areas of Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia,
would be 70 days, between November 15 and February 15, with a 5-bird
daily bag limit. In North Carolina, Massachusetts, and New York, the
framework would be 70 days between the last Saturday in October and
February 15, with a 5-bird daily bag limit. These seasons would be in
lieu of any special late seasons and subject to annual evaluation of
band recovery and harvest data.
The Mississippi Flyway Council recommended a number of changes in
season lengths, bag limits, zones, and quotas for Canada geese. All of
these changes are based on improved population status and current
management plans. The Council also recommended that Mississippi Valley
Population (MVP) and Southern James Bay Population (SJBP) harvest zones
be established in Michigan.
Service Response: This spring, the estimated number of AP goose
breeding pairs in northern Quebec increased by more than 50 percent
overall from 93,200 to 147,000 pairs. In addition, production prospects
this year appear to be very good and a larger fall flight is expected.
In view of this strong recovery, we believe this year presents a good
opportunity to increase harvest opportunity within the AP zones of the
Atlantic Flyway. Thus, we concur with the Atlantic Flyway Council's
recommendation and believe the this proposal continues the responsible
approach the Council has taken in previous years. Given past history,
we encourage the States to closely monitor the harvest of this
population in the next few years.
We also support the boundary modifications and framework date
changes in North Carolina and the recommendation for NAP geese.
Regarding the Atlantic Flyway Council's recommendation for resident
goose areas, while we support the overall intent of this season, we
have concerns about how these ``RP'' zones are delineated and would be
evaluated in the future
is
population in the next few years.
We also support the boundary modifications and framework date
changes in North Carolina and the recommendation for NAP geese.
Regarding the Atlantic Flyway Council's recommendation for resident
goose areas, while we support the overall intent of this season, we
have concerns about how these ``RP'' zones are delineated and would be
evaluated in the future. The proposal, based on a portion (10 percent)
of historic band

recoveries of migrant geese, is difficult to assess because these
populations are not banded on a representative basis. Also, fall and
winter distributions are subject to changes over time and often vary
with habitat and environmental changes. While this proposal would
appear to take a cautious approach, we are concerned that regular
seasons continue to provide adequate protection for migrant geese for
which they were originally designed. Also, we have concerns about how
these RP zones would continue to be monitored and on what basis they
would be discontinued if migrant geese are harvested above some
identified level. For these reasons, we do not support this proposal.
We concur with the recommended changes in the Mississippi Flyway.
Most of these changes are based on the current population status of
geese and are consistent with current management plans.

C. Special Late Seasons

Council Recommendations: The Mississippi Flyway Council recommended
that the experimental late season for Canada geese in the Central
Michigan Goose Management Unit be made operational.
Service Response: We concur with the recommended change.

6. Brant

Council Recommendations: The Pacific Flyway Council recommended
allowing Washington's brant season to be split into two segments.
Service Response: We concur with the recommended change.

8. Swans
recommended
that the experimental late season for Canada geese in the Central
Michigan Goose Management Unit be made operational.
Service Response: We concur with the recommended change.

6. Brant

Council Recommendations: The Pacific Flyway Council recommended
allowing Washington's brant season to be split into two segments.
Service Response: We concur with the recommended change.

8. Swans

Council Recommendations: The Pacific Flyway Council recommended
swan frameworks as outlined in the Service's 2001 Environmental
Assessment ``Proposals to establish operational/experimental general
swan hunting seasons in the Pacific Flyway.''
Written Comments: The Trumpeter Swan Society requested
reconsideration of the recent decision regarding tundra and trumpeter
swan hunting seasons and to close all areas south of the Idaho-Utah
State border to the take of all trumpeter swans and further to close
Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge to all swan hunting.
Service Response: The Service has authorized the take of a limited
number of trumpeter swans in the previously existing tundra swan
seasons in the Pacific Flyway (excluding Alaska) since the 1995-96
hunting season. The regulations establishing this limited take were
first based on a 1995 Environmental Assessment (EA) (Bartonek et
al.1995) and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). Last year, we
issued a supplemental EA (Trost et al. 2000) and new FONSI. The
supplemental EA reviewed the first 5 years of the experimental swan
season and made modifications to the existing season in an attempt to
reconcile potentially conflicting management strategies for tundra and
trumpeter swans in the Pacific Flyway.
During the past year since the release of the supplemental EA,
actions occurred that have contributed to the Service revising and
reissuing both a draft and final EA on this issue
t 5 years of the experimental swan
season and made modifications to the existing season in an attempt to
reconcile potentially conflicting management strategies for tundra and
trumpeter swans in the Pacific Flyway.
During the past year since the release of the supplemental EA,
actions occurred that have contributed to the Service revising and
reissuing both a draft and final EA on this issue. First, the Service
and cooperators (Canadian Wildlife Service, numerous States and
Provinces, and private conservation groups) conducted a comprehensive
survey of the number and distribution of breeding trumpeter swans
throughout their known North American breeding range during the summer
of 2000, providing new information on the status and population trends
of trumpeter swans (Caithamer 2001). This new comprehensive survey
information documents the continued increase of the three recognized
Trumpeter swan populations in North America, both in numerical
abundance and in geographic range since the last comprehensive survey
in 1995. Second, we were challenged in a lawsuit directed at our
decision last year to allow a limited take of trumpeter swans in the
2000-01 swan hunting season, and as part of settling that lawsuit, we
agreed to re-initiate the NEPA process in 2001.
A swan season that also permitted the take of a limited number of
trumpeter swans in the Pacific Flyway was instituted in 1995. Prior to
that time, and beginning in 1962, a tundra swan only season had been in
effect. During the tundra swan seasons, it was known that some number
of trumpeter swans were taken by swan hunters who mistook them for
tundra swans. We looked at this very small take and concluded that any
impact on trumpeter swan populations would be minor. Because of that
conclusion, we decided to authorize a limited take incidental to the
hunting of tundra swans. This limited take was authorized in an attempt
to reconcile potentially conflicting strategies for managing two swan
species in the Pacific Flyway
took them for
tundra swans. We looked at this very small take and concluded that any
impact on trumpeter swan populations would be minor. Because of that
conclusion, we decided to authorize a limited take incidental to the
hunting of tundra swans. This limited take was authorized in an attempt
to reconcile potentially conflicting strategies for managing two swan
species in the Pacific Flyway. The potentially conflicting strategies
are: (1) To enhance the winter range distribution of the less abundant
RMP of trumpeter swans by severely restricting or eliminating swan
hunting in portions of the Pacific Flyway currently open to hunting
these species, and (2) to optimize hunting of the more numerous and
widely distributed Western Population (WP) of tundra swans in the
Pacific Flyway.
We issued a FONSI in August of 1995 and again in July of 2000 after
assessing impacts in two previous EAs on this issue. The proposed
actions in these EAs represented a balance between the two competing
management strategies by establishing a general swan season in portions
of Montana, Utah, and Nevada that allowed the taking of any species of
swan (Cygnus sp.) subject to the following conditions:
(1) A limited quota on the take of trumpeter swans, which, upon
being reached, would trigger the cessation of all swan hunting in the
designated area,
(2) Modification of the already limited take and restricted seasons
on tundra swans to enhance the likelihood that trumpeter swans would be
successful in expanding their winter range, and,
swan (Cygnus sp.) subject to the following conditions:
(1) A limited quota on the take of trumpeter swans, which, upon
being reached, would trigger the cessation of all swan hunting in the
designated area,
(2) Modification of the already limited take and restricted seasons
on tundra swans to enhance the likelihood that trumpeter swans would be
successful in expanding their winter range, and,
(3) The development and implementation of a program to monitor the
effectiveness of this action.
Under the new proposed action, identified in the 2001 EA (Trost et
al. 2001), we would continue to establish a hunting season for tundra
swans with an authorization of a small take of trumpeter swans in
designated portions of Montana, Utah and Nevada, within the Pacific
Flyway. Constraints imposed upon swan hunting seasons implemented last
year would be continued. Additionally, specific areas open to swan
hunting in Montana, Utah and Nevada would remain as defined in the
2000-01 regulations. Further, included is a new requirement for the
development of a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the State of
Utah and the Service detailing monitoring, hunter training, and season
closure procedures for the experimental swan hunt in Utah.
A notice of availability of the draft EA was published in the
Federal Register on April 25, 2001 (66 FR 20828). In addition, the
draft EA was posted on the Division of Migratory Bird Management's web
page and mailed to all organizations and private individuals who
requested copies. We carefully reviewed all public comments. The
comments were considered in light of the analysis in the EA. The EA
addressed all substantive comments received during the 30-day comment
period. Copies of the EA and the Finding of No Significant Impact are
available at the address indicated under the caption ADDRESSES or from
our website at http://migratorybirds.fws.gov
s who
requested copies. We carefully reviewed all public comments. The
comments were considered in light of the analysis in the EA. The EA
addressed all substantive comments received during the 30-day comment
period. Copies of the EA and the Finding of No Significant Impact are
available at the address indicated under the caption ADDRESSES or from
our website at http://migratorybirds.fws.gov.
Additionally, although not directly related to the issue of hunting
seasons, we have continued to provide a leadership role in attempting
to enhance trumpeter swan status and breeding

distribution within the Pacific Flyway through increased efforts
directed at establishment of breeding trumpeter swans in suitable
habitats throughout the Pacific Flyway. We have recently provided
funding for production of cygnets for later reintroduction into
suitable habitat. We would also continue to support cooperative efforts
to address the winter distribution issues by working with State, non-
governmental organizations (NGO) and individual partners. We would
support limited winter capture and translocation on a case-by-case
basis when circumstances develop that warrant such activity. We do not
plan to employ winter translocations as the primary method to address
the winter distribution problem of RMP trumpeter swans. Rather,
translocation will be employed as a method to limit risk to swans from
direct over-winter mortality, on an as needed basis.
Continued progress toward development of the implementation plan
(Bouffard et al. 2001) has occurred. We believe the actions outlined in
the plan will help address concerns regarding the number of swans
nesting in the Tristate area and help establish new winter distribution
patterns. Evidence suggests current and past management activities have
made progress toward improving the winter distribution situation
(Bouffard 2000). We expect that further actions will continue to
improve the status and distribution of RMP trumpeter swans
plan will help address concerns regarding the number of swans
nesting in the Tristate area and help establish new winter distribution
patterns. Evidence suggests current and past management activities have
made progress toward improving the winter distribution situation
(Bouffard 2000). We expect that further actions will continue to
improve the status and distribution of RMP trumpeter swans. We will
continue implementation efforts to the greatest extent possible.
We appreciate the continued support of The Trumpeter Swan Society
(TSS) in the development of a more comprehensive implementation plan to
achieve the goals and objectives of the 1998 Pacific Flyway Management
Plan for the RMP of trumpeter swans. We remain committed to the goals
and objectives of this plan and will continue to work with all partners
to achieve these objectives. We have carefully considered all the input
received from the TSS and other concerned agencies, organizations and
individuals. In particular, we reconsidered the request to close all
areas in Utah and Nevada to any legal take of Trumpeter swans and to
close the Bear River Refuge in Utah to all swan hunting. After a review
of the situation, the Service stands behind it's conclusions in the
most recent Environmental Assessment regarding the need to implement
the specific recommendations of the TSS (Trost et al. 2001: pages 31-32
and 41-45). We acknowledge a wide disparity of opinion regarding the
potential impact of a limited take of trumpeter swans in Utah and
Nevada on achieving the goals and objectives of the 1998 plan. Our
independent assessment is that the limited take allowed in these
seasons will not adversely impact management intended to achieve these
objectives and we conclude that the existing seasons should be
maintained as described in the Final EA on this issue.

Public Comment Invited
t of a limited take of trumpeter swans in Utah and
Nevada on achieving the goals and objectives of the 1998 plan. Our
independent assessment is that the limited take allowed in these
seasons will not adversely impact management intended to achieve these
objectives and we conclude that the existing seasons should be
maintained as described in the Final EA on this issue.

Public Comment Invited

The Department of the Interior's policy is, whenever practicable,
to afford the public an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking
process. We intend that adopted final rules be as responsive as
possible to all concerned interests and, therefore, seek the comments
and suggestions of the public, other concerned governmental agencies,
nongovernmental organizations, and other private interests on these
proposals. Accordingly, we invite interested persons to submit written
comments, suggestions, or recommendations regarding the proposed
regulations to the address indicated under the caption ADDRESSES.
Special circumstances involved in the establishment of these
regulations limit the amount of time that we can allow for public
comment. Specifically, two considerations compress the time in which
the rulemaking process must operate: (1) The need to establish final
rules at a point early enough in the summer to allow affected State
agencies to adjust their licensing and regulatory mechanisms; and (2)
the unavailability, before mid-June, of specific, reliable data on this
year's status of some waterfowl and migratory shore and upland game
bird populations. Therefore, we believe that to allow comment periods
past the dates specified is contrary to the public interest.
Before promulgation of final migratory game bird hunting
regulations, we will take into consideration all comments received.
Such comments, and any additional information received, may lead to
final regulations that differ from these proposals
ore and upland game
bird populations. Therefore, we believe that to allow comment periods
past the dates specified is contrary to the public interest.
Before promulgation of final migratory game bird hunting
regulations, we will take into consideration all comments received.
Such comments, and any additional information received, may lead to
final regulations that differ from these proposals. You may inspect
comments received on the proposed annual regulations during normal
business hours at the Service's office in room 634, 4401 North Fairfax
Drive, Arlington, Virginia. For each series of proposed rulemakings, we
will establish specific comment periods. We will consider, but possibly
may not respond in detail to, each comment. However, as in the past, we
will summarize all comments received during the comment period and
respond to them in the final rule.

NEPA Consideration

NEPA considerations are covered by the programmatic document,
``Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: Issuance of Annual
Regulations Permitting the Sport Hunting of Migratory Birds (FSES 88-
14),'' filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on June 9, 1988.
We published a Notice of Availability in the Federal Register on June
16, 1988 (53 FR 22582). We published our Record of Decision on August
18, 1988 (53 FR 31341). Copies are available from the address indicated
under the caption ADDRESSES.
Additionally, issues pertaining to swan hunting in the Pacific
Flyway were covered under a separate NEPA document, ``Swan Hunting in
the Pacific Flyway,'' issued June 14, 2001, with a Finding of No
Significant Impact issued June 14, 2001. Copies are available from the
address indicated under the caption ADDRESSES.

Endangered Species Act Consideration
s indicated
under the caption ADDRESSES.
Additionally, issues pertaining to swan hunting in the Pacific
Flyway were covered under a separate NEPA document, ``Swan Hunting in
the Pacific Flyway,'' issued June 14, 2001, with a Finding of No
Significant Impact issued June 14, 2001. Copies are available from the
address indicated under the caption ADDRESSES.

Endangered Species Act Consideration

Prior to issuance of the 2001-02 migratory game bird hunting
regulations, we will consider provisions of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543; hereinafter the Act) to
ensure that hunting is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence
of any species designated as endangered or threatened or modify or
destroy its critical habitat and that the proposed action is consistent
with conservation programs for those species. Consultations under
Section 7 of this Act may cause us to change proposals in this and
future supplemental proposed rulemakings.

Executive Order (E.O.) 12866

While this individual supplemental rule was not reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the migratory bird hunting
regulations are economically significant and are annually reviewed by
OMB under E.O. 12866. E.O. 12866 requires each agency to write
regulations that are easy to understand. We invite comments on how to
make this rule easier to understand, including answers to questions
such as the following: (1) Are the requirements in the rule clearly
stated? (2) Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that
interferes with its clarity? (3) Does the format of the rule (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or
reduce its clarity? (4) Would the rule be easier to understand if it
were divided into more (but shorter) sections? (5) Is the description
of the rule in the

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of the preamble helpful in
understanding the rule? What else could we do to make the rule easier
to understand?
of the rule (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or
reduce its clarity? (4) Would the rule be easier to understand if it
were divided into more (but shorter) sections? (5) Is the description
of the rule in the

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of the preamble helpful in
understanding the rule? What else could we do to make the rule easier
to understand?

Regulatory Flexibility Act

These regulations have a significant economic impact on substantial
numbers of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). We analyzed the economic impacts of the annual
hunting regulations on small business entities in detail and issued a
Small Entity Flexibility Analysis (Analysis) in 1998. The Analysis
documented the significant beneficial economic effect on a substantial
number of small entities. The primary source of information about
hunter expenditures for migratory game bird hunting is the National
Hunting and Fishing Survey, which is conducted at 5-year intervals. The
Analysis was based on the 1996 National Hunting and Fishing Survey and
the U.S. Department of Commerce's County Business Patterns, from which
it was estimated that migratory bird hunters would spend between $429
million and $1.084 billion at small businesses in 1998. Copies of the
Analysis are available upon request from the address indicated under
the caption ADDRESSES.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

This rule is a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. For the reasons outlined above,
this rule has an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more.
However, because this rule establishes hunting seasons, we do not plan
to defer the effective date under the exemption contained in 5 U.S.C.
808(1).

Paperwork Reduction Act
airness Act

This rule is a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. For the reasons outlined above,
this rule has an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more.
However, because this rule establishes hunting seasons, we do not plan
to defer the effective date under the exemption contained in 5 U.S.C.
808(1).

Paperwork Reduction Act

We examined these regulations under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. The various recordkeeping and reporting requirements imposed
under regulations established in 50 CFR part 20, Subpart K, are
utilized in the formulation of migratory game bird hunting regulations.
Specifically, OMB has approved the information collection requirements
of the Migratory Bird Harvest Information Program and assigned control
number 1018-0015 (expires 09/30/2001). This information is used to
provide a sampling frame for voluntary national surveys to improve our
harvest estimates for all migratory game birds in order to better
manage these populations. A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

We have determined and certify, in compliance with the requirements
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that this
rulemaking will not ``significantly or uniquely'' affect small
governments, and will not produce a Federal mandate of $100 million or
more in any given year on local or State government or private
entities. Therefore, this proposed rule is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.

Civil Justice Reform--E.O. 12988

The Department, in promulgating this proposed rule, has determined
that this rule will not unduly burden the judicial system and meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of E.O. 12988.

Energy Effects--E.O. 13211
nt or private
entities. Therefore, this proposed rule is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.

Civil Justice Reform--E.O. 12988

The Department, in promulgating this proposed rule, has determined
that this rule will not unduly burden the judicial system and meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of E.O. 12988.

Energy Effects--E.O. 13211

On May 18, 2001, the President issued an Executive Order (E.O.
13211) on regulations that significantly affect energy supply,
distribution, and use. E.O. 13211 requires agencies to prepare
Statements of Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions. While
this supplemental proposed rule is a significant regulatory action
under E.O. 12866, it is not expected to adversely affect energy
supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore, this proposed action is not
a significant energy action and no Statement of Energy Effects is
required.

Takings Implication Assessment

In accordance with E.O. 12630, this proposed rule does not have
significant takings implications and does not affect any
constitutionally protected property rights. This rule will not result
in the physical occupancy of property, the physical invasion of
property, or the regulatory taking of any property. In fact, this rule
will allow hunters to exercise otherwise unavailable privileges, and,
therefore, reduces restrictions on the use of private and public
property.

Federalism Effects
and does not affect any
constitutionally protected property rights. This rule will not result
in the physical occupancy of property, the physical invasion of
property, or the regulatory taking of any property. In fact, this rule
will allow hunters to exercise otherwise unavailable privileges, and,
therefore, reduces restrictions on the use of private and public
property.

Federalism Effects

Due to the migratory nature of certain species of birds, the
Federal Government has been given responsibility over these species by
the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. We annually prescribe frameworks from
which the States make selections and employ guidelines to establish
special regulations on Federal Indian reservations and ceded lands.
This process preserves the ability of the States and Tribes to
determine which seasons meet their individual needs. Any State or Tribe
may be more restrictive than the Federal frameworks at any time. The
frameworks are developed in a cooperative process with the States and
the Flyway Councils. This allows States to participate in the
development of frameworks from which they will make selections, thereby
having an influence on their own regulations. These rules do not have a
substantial direct effect on fiscal capacity, change the roles or
responsibilities of Federal or State governments, or intrude on State
policy or administration. Therefore, in accordance with E.O. 13132,
these regulations do not have significant federalism effects and do not
have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 20

Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation, Wildlife.

The rules that eventually will be promulgated for the 2001-02
hunting season are authorized under 16 U.S.C. 703-712 and 16 U.S.C. 742
a-j.

Dated: August 15, 2001.
Joseph E. Doddridge,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
lism Assessment.

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 20

Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation, Wildlife.

The rules that eventually will be promulgated for the 2001-02
hunting season are authorized under 16 U.S.C. 703-712 and 16 U.S.C. 742
a-j.

Dated: August 15, 2001.
Joseph E. Doddridge,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.

Proposed Regulations Frameworks for 2001-02 Late Hunting Seasons on
Certain Migratory Game Birds

Pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and delegated
authorities, the Department has approved frameworks for season lengths,
shooting hours, bag and possession limits, and outside dates within
which States may select seasons for hunting waterfowl and coots between
the dates of September 1, 2001, and March 10, 2002.

General

Dates: All outside dates noted below are inclusive.
Shooting and Hawking (taking by falconry) Hours: Unless otherwise
specified, from one-half hour before sunrise to sunset daily.
Possession Limits: Unless otherwise specified, possession limits
are twice the daily bag limit.

Flyways and Management Units

Waterfowl Flyways

Atlantic Flyway--includes Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia,
Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York,
North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode

Island, South Carolina, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia.
Mississippi Flyway--includes Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana,
Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri,
Ohio, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.
Central Flyway--includes Colorado (east of the Continental Divide),
Kansas, Montana (Counties of Blaine, Carbon, Fergus, Judith Basin,
Stillwater, Sweetgrass, Wheatland, and all counties east thereof),
Nebraska, New Mexico (east of the Continental Divide except the
Jicarilla Apache Indian Reservation), North Dakota, Oklahoma, South
Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming (east of the Continental Divide)
Central Flyway--includes Colorado (east of the Continental Divide),
Kansas, Montana (Counties of Blaine, Carbon, Fergus, Judith Basin,
Stillwater, Sweetgrass, Wheatland, and all counties east thereof),
Nebraska, New Mexico (east of the Continental Divide except the
Jicarilla Apache Indian Reservation), North Dakota, Oklahoma, South
Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming (east of the Continental Divide).
Pacific Flyway--includes Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho,
Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and those portions of Colorado,
Montana, New Mexico, and Wyoming not included in the Central Flyway.

Management Units

High Plains Mallard Management Unit--roughly defined as that
portion of the Central Flyway which lies west of the 100th meridian.
Definitions: For the purpose of hunting regulations listed below,
the collective terms ``dark'' and ``light'' geese include the following
species:
Dark geese--Canada geese, white-fronted geese, brant, and all other
goose species except light geese.
Light geese--snow (including blue) geese and Ross' geese.
Area, Zone, and Unit Descriptions: Geographic descriptions related
to late-season regulations are contained in a later portion of this
document.
Area-Specific Provisions: Frameworks for open seasons, season
lengths, bag and possession limits, and other special provisions are
listed below by Flyway.
Compensatory Days in the Atlantic Flyway: In the Atlantic Flyway
States of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New
Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, where Sunday
hunting is prohibited statewide by State law, all Sundays are closed to
all take of migratory waterfowl (including mergansers and coots).

Atlantic Flyway
l provisions are
listed below by Flyway.
Compensatory Days in the Atlantic Flyway: In the Atlantic Flyway
States of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New
Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, where Sunday
hunting is prohibited statewide by State law, all Sundays are closed to
all take of migratory waterfowl (including mergansers and coots).

Atlantic Flyway

Ducks, Mergansers, and Coots: Outside Dates: Between October 1 and
January 20.
Hunting Seasons and Duck Limits: 60 days, except canvasbacks which
may not exceed 20 consecutive days, and daily bag limit of 6 ducks,
including no more than 4 mallards (2 hens), 3 scaup, 1 black duck, 1
pintail, 1 mottled duck, 1 fulvous whistling duck, 2 wood ducks, 2
redheads, 1 canvasback, and 4 scoters.
Closures: The season on harlequin ducks is closed.
Sea Ducks: Within the special sea duck areas, during the regular
duck season in the Atlantic Flyway, States may choose to allow the
above sea duck limits in addition to the limits applying to other ducks
during the regular duck season. In all other areas, sea ducks may be
taken only during the regular open season for ducks and are part of the
regular duck season daily bag (not to exceed 4 scoters) and possession
limits.
Merganser Limits: The daily bag limit of mergansers is 5, only 1 of
which may be a hooded merganser.
Coot Limits: The daily bag limit is 15 coots.
Lake Champlain Zone, New York: The waterfowl seasons, limits, and
shooting hours shall be the same as those selected for the Lake
Champlain Zone of Vermont.
Connecticut River Zone, Vermont: The waterfowl seasons, limits, and
shooting hours shall be the same as those selected for the Inland Zone
of New Hampshire
which may be a hooded merganser.
Coot Limits: The daily bag limit is 15 coots.
Lake Champlain Zone, New York: The waterfowl seasons, limits, and
shooting hours shall be the same as those selected for the Lake
Champlain Zone of Vermont.
Connecticut River Zone, Vermont: The waterfowl seasons, limits, and
shooting hours shall be the same as those selected for the Inland Zone
of New Hampshire.
Zoning and Split Seasons: Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Maryland,
North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Virginia may split
their seasons into three segments; Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts,
New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and West
Virginia may select hunting seasons by zones and may split their
seasons into two segments in each zone.
Canada Geese: Season Lengths, Outside Dates, and Limits: Specific
regulations for Canada geese are shown below by State. Unless specified
otherwise, seasons may be split into two segments. In areas within
States where the framework closing date for Atlantic Population (AP)
goose seasons overlaps with special late season frameworks for resident
geese, the framework closing date for AP goose seasons is January 14.
Connecticut: North Atlantic Population (NAP) Zone: A 45-day season
may be held between October 1 and January 20 with a 2-bird daily bag
limit.
Atlantic Population (AP) Zone: A 30-day season may be held between
last Saturday in October (October 27) and January 20 with a 2-bird
daily bag limit.
South Zone: A special experimental season may be held between
January 15 and February 15, with a 5-bird daily bag limit.
Delaware: A 30-day season may be held between November 15 and
January 20 with a 1-bird daily bag limit.
Florida: A 70-day season may be held between November 15 and
February 15, with a 5-bird daily bag limit.
Georgia: In specific areas, a 70-day season may be held between
November 15 and February 15, with a 5-bird daily bag limit
en
January 15 and February 15, with a 5-bird daily bag limit.
Delaware: A 30-day season may be held between November 15 and
January 20 with a 1-bird daily bag limit.
Florida: A 70-day season may be held between November 15 and
February 15, with a 5-bird daily bag limit.
Georgia: In specific areas, a 70-day season may be held between
November 15 and February 15, with a 5-bird daily bag limit.
Maine: A 45-day season may be held Statewide between October 1 and
January 20 with a 2-bird daily bag limit.
Maryland: Southern James Bay Population (SJBP) Zone: A 40-day
season may be held between November 15 and January 14, with a 2-bird
daily bag limit. The season may be split 3-ways. Additionally, an
experimental season may be held from January 15 to February 15, with a
5-bird daily bag limit.
AP Zone: A 30-day season may be held between November 15 and
January 20 with a 1-bird daily bag limit.
Massachusetts: NAP Zone: A 45-day season may be held between
October 1 and January 20 with a 2-bird daily bag limit. Additionally, a
special season may be held from January 15 to February 15, with a 5-
bird daily bag limit.
AP Zone: A 30-day season may be held between last Saturday in
October (October 27) and January 20 with a 2-bird daily bag limit.
New Hampshire: A 45-day season may be held statewide between
October 1 and January 20 with a 2-bird daily bag limit.
New Jersey: Statewide: A 30-day season may be held between last
Saturday in October (October 27) and January 20 with a 2-bird daily bag
limit.
Special Late Goose Season Area: An experimental season may be held
in designated areas of North and South New Jersey from January 15 to
February 15, with a 5-bird daily bag limit.
New York: SJBP Zone: A 70-day season may be held between November 1
and January 30, with a 2-bird daily bag limit.
NAP Zone: A 45-day season may be held between October 1 and January
20 with a 2-bird daily bag limit
pecial Late Goose Season Area: An experimental season may be held
in designated areas of North and South New Jersey from January 15 to
February 15, with a 5-bird daily bag limit.
New York: SJBP Zone: A 70-day season may be held between November 1
and January 30, with a 2-bird daily bag limit.
NAP Zone: A 45-day season may be held between October 1 and January
20 with a 2-bird daily bag limit.
Special Late Goose Season Area: An experimental season may be held
between January 15 and February 15, with a 5-bird daily bag limit in
designated areas of Chemung, Delaware, Tioga, Broome, Sullivan,
Westchester, Nassau, Suffolk, Orange, Dutchess, Putnam, and Rockland
Counties.
AP Zone: A 30-day season may be held between last Saturday in
October (October 27) and January 20 with a 2-bird daily bag limit.
North Carolina: A 50-day season may be held between October 1 and
December 31, with a 2-bird daily bag limit, except for the Northeast
Hunt

Unit and Northampton County, which is closed.
Pennsylvania: SJBP Zone: A 40-day season may be held between
November 15 and January 14, with a 2-bird daily bag limit.
AP Zone: A 30-day season may be held between last Saturday in
October (October 27) and January 20 with a 2-bird daily bag limit.
Special Late Goose Season Area: An experimental season may be held
from January 15 to February 15 with a 5-bird daily bag limit.
Pymatuning Zone: A 35-day season may be held between October 1 and
January 20, with a 1-bird daily bag limit.
Rhode Island: A 45-day season may be held between October 1 and
January 20 with a 2-bird daily bag limit. An experimental season may be
held in designated areas from January 15 to February 15, with a 5-bird
daily bag limit.
South Carolina: In designated areas, a 70-day season may be held
during November 15 to February 15, with a 5-bird daily bag limit.
Vermont: A 30-day season may be held between last Saturday in
October (October 27) and January 20 with a 2-bird daily bag limit
daily bag limit. An experimental season may be
held in designated areas from January 15 to February 15, with a 5-bird
daily bag limit.
South Carolina: In designated areas, a 70-day season may be held
during November 15 to February 15, with a 5-bird daily bag limit.
Vermont: A 30-day season may be held between last Saturday in
October (October 27) and January 20 with a 2-bird daily bag limit.
Virginia: SJBP Zone: A 40-day season may be held between November
15 and January 14, with a 2-bird daily bag limit. Additionally, an
experimental season may be held between January 15 and February 15,
with a 5-bird daily bag limit.
AP Zone: A 30-day season may be held between November 15 and
January 20 with a 1-bird daily bag limit.
Back Bay Area: Season is closed.
West Virginia: A 70-day season may be held between October 1 and
January 31, with a 3-bird daily bag limit.
Light Geese: Season Lengths, Outside Dates, and Limits: States may
select a 107-day season between October 1 and March 10, with a 15-bird
daily bag limit and no possession limit. States may split their seasons
into three segments, except in Delaware and Maryland, where, following
the completion of their duck season, and until March 10, Delaware and
Maryland may split the remaining portion of the season to hunt on
Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays, and Saturdays only.
Brant: Season Lengths, Outside Dates, and Limits: States may select
a 50-day season between October 1 and January 20, with a 2-bird daily
bag limit. States may split their seasons into two segments.

Mississippi Flyway
etion of their duck season, and until March 10, Delaware and
Maryland may split the remaining portion of the season to hunt on
Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays, and Saturdays only.
Brant: Season Lengths, Outside Dates, and Limits: States may select
a 50-day season between October 1 and January 20, with a 2-bird daily
bag limit. States may split their seasons into two segments.

Mississippi Flyway

Ducks, Mergansers, and Coots: Outside Dates: Between the Saturday
nearest October 1 (September 29) and the Sunday nearest January 20
(January 20). Seasons in Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee may extend
to January 31.
Hunting Seasons and Duck Limits: 60 days (51 days in Alabama,
Mississippi, and Tennessee), except that the season for canvasbacks may
not exceed 20 consecutive days. The daily bag limit is 6 ducks,
including no more than 4 mallards (no more than 2 of which may be
females), 3 mottled ducks, 3 scaup, 1 black duck, 1 pintail, 2 wood
ducks, 1 canvasback, and 2 redheads.
Merganser Limits: The daily bag limit is 5, only 1 of which may be
a hooded merganser. In States that include mergansers in the duck bag
limit, the daily limit is the same as the duck bag limit, only one of
which may be a hooded merganser.
Coot Limits: The daily bag limit is 15 coots.
Zoning and Split Seasons: Alabama, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,
Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Tennessee, and Wisconsin
may select hunting seasons by zones.
In Alabama, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Ohio,
Tennessee, and Wisconsin, the season may be split into two segments in
each zone.
In Arkansas, Minnesota, and Mississippi, the season may be split
into three segments.
Geese: Split Seasons: Seasons for geese may be split into three
segments. Three-way split seasons for Canada geese require Mississippi
Flyway Council and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service approval and a 3-year
evaluation by each participating State
nsin, the season may be split into two segments in
each zone.
In Arkansas, Minnesota, and Mississippi, the season may be split
into three segments.
Geese: Split Seasons: Seasons for geese may be split into three
segments. Three-way split seasons for Canada geese require Mississippi
Flyway Council and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service approval and a 3-year
evaluation by each participating State.
Season Lengths, Outside Dates, and Limits: States may select
seasons for light geese not to exceed 107 days with 20 geese daily
between the Saturday nearest October 1 (September 29) and March 10; for
white-fronted geese not to exceed 86 days with 2 geese daily or 107
days with 1 goose daily between the Saturday nearest October 1
(September 29) and the Sunday nearest February 15 (February 17); and
for brant not to exceed 70 days with 2 brant daily or 107 days with 1
brant daily between the Saturday nearest October 1 (September 29) and
January 31. There is no possession limit for light geese. Specific
regulations for Canada geese and exceptions to the above general
provisions are shown below by State. Except as noted below, the outside
dates for Canada geese are the Saturday nearest October 1 (September
29) and January 31.
Alabama: In the Southern James Bay Population (SJBP) Goose Zone,
the season for Canada geese may not exceed 50 days. Elsewhere, the
season for Canada geese may extend for 70 days in the respective duck-
hunting zones. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada geese.
Arkansas: The season for Canada geese may extend for 23 days. The
season may extend to February 15. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada
geese.
Illinois: The total harvest of Canada geese in the State will be
limited to 54,800 birds. The possession limit is 10 Canada geese.
(a) North Zone--The season for Canada geese will close after 70
days or when 7,250 birds have been harvested in the Northern Illinois
Quota Zone, whichever occurs first. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada
geese.
o February 15. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada
geese.
Illinois: The total harvest of Canada geese in the State will be
limited to 54,800 birds. The possession limit is 10 Canada geese.
(a) North Zone--The season for Canada geese will close after 70
days or when 7,250 birds have been harvested in the Northern Illinois
Quota Zone, whichever occurs first. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada
geese.
(b) Central Zone--The season for Canada geese will close after 70
days or when 9,250 birds have been harvested in the Central Illinois
Quota Zone, whichever occurs first. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada
geese.
(c) South Zone--The harvest of Canada geese in the Southern
Illinois and Rend Lake Quota Zones will be limited to 16,550 and 2,100
birds, respectively. The season for Canada geese in each zone will
close after 70 days or when the harvest limit has been reached,
whichever occurs first. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada geese. In the
Southern Illinois Quota Zone, if any of the following conditions exist
after December 20, the State, after consultation with the Service, will
close the season by emergency order with 48 hours notice:
(1) Average body weights of adult female geese less than 3,200
grams as measured from a weekly sample of a minimum of 50 geese.
(2) Starvation or a major disease outbreak resulting in observed
mortality exceeding 5,000 birds in 10 days, or a total mortality
exceeding 10,000 birds.
In the remainder of the South Zone, the season may extend for 70
days or until both the Southern Illinois and Rend Lake Quota Zones have
been closed, whichever occurs first. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada
geese.
Indiana: The total harvest of Canada geese in the State will be
limited to 19,200 birds. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada geese.
(a) North Zone: The season for Canada geese may extend for 50 days.
(b) SJBP Zone--The season for Canada geese may extend for 50 days.
(c) South Zone--The season for Canada geese may extend for 56 days.
whichever occurs first. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada
geese.
Indiana: The total harvest of Canada geese in the State will be
limited to 19,200 birds. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada geese.
(a) North Zone: The season for Canada geese may extend for 50 days.
(b) SJBP Zone--The season for Canada geese may extend for 50 days.
(c) South Zone--The season for Canada geese may extend for 56 days.
(d) Ohio River Zone
(1) Posey County--The season for Canada geese will close after 56
days or when the Canada goose harvest at Hovey Lake Fish and Wildlife
Area

exceeds 960 birds, whichever occurs first.
(2) Remainder of the Ohio River Zone--The season may extend for 56
days.
Iowa: The season may extend for 70 days. The daily bag limit is 2
Canada geese.
Kentucky: (a) Western Zone--The season for Canada geese may extend
for 50 days (65 days in Fulton County), and the harvest will be limited
to 11,520 birds. Of the 11,520-bird quota, 7,490 birds will be
allocated to the Ballard Reporting Area and 2,880 birds will be
allocated to the Henderson/Union Reporting Area. If the quota in either
reporting area is reached prior to completion of the 50-day season, the
season in that reporting area will be closed. If the quotas in both the
Ballard and Henderson/Union reporting areas are reached prior to
completion of the 50-day season, the season in the counties and
portions of counties that comprise the Western Goose Zone (listed in
State regulations) may continue for an additional 7 days, not to exceed
a total of 50 days (65 days in Fulton County). The season in Fulton
County may extend to February 15. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada
geese.
(b) Pennyroyal/Coalfield Zone--The season may extend for 50 days.
The daily bag limit is 2 Canada geese.
es and
portions of counties that comprise the Western Goose Zone (listed in
State regulations) may continue for an additional 7 days, not to exceed
a total of 50 days (65 days in Fulton County). The season in Fulton
County may extend to February 15. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada
geese.
(b) Pennyroyal/Coalfield Zone--The season may extend for 50 days.
The daily bag limit is 2 Canada geese.
(c) Remainder of the State--The season may extend for 50 days. The
daily bag limit is 2 Canada geese.
Louisiana: The season for Canada geese may extend for 9 days.
During the season, the daily bag limit is 1 Canada goose and 2 white-
fronted geese with an 86-day white-fronted goose season or 1 white-
fronted goose with a 107-day season. Hunters participating in the
Canada goose season must possess a special permit issued by the State.
Michigan: (a) MVP Zone--The total harvest of Canada geese will be
limited to 30,950 birds. The framework opening date for all geese is
September 16 and the season for Canada geese may extend for 17 days.
The daily bag limit is 2 Canada geese.
(1) Allegan County GMU--The Canada goose season will close after 25
days or when 1,100 birds have been harvested, whichever occurs first.
The daily bag limit is 1 Canada goose.
(2) Muskegon Wastewater GMU--The Canada goose season will close
after 25 days or when 350 birds have been harvested, whichever occurs
first. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada geese.
(b) SJBP Zone--The framework opening date for all geese is
September 16 and the season for Canada geese may extend for 30 days.
The daily bag limit is 2 Canada geese.
(1) Saginaw County GMU--The Canada goose season will close after 50
days or when 2,000 birds have been harvested, whichever occurs first.
The daily bag limit is 1 Canada goose.
(2) Tuscola/Huron GMU--The Canada goose season will close after 50
days or when 750 birds have been harvested, whichever occurs first. The
daily bag limit is 1 Canada goose.
ys.
The daily bag limit is 2 Canada geese.
(1) Saginaw County GMU--The Canada goose season will close after 50
days or when 2,000 birds have been harvested, whichever occurs first.
The daily bag limit is 1 Canada goose.
(2) Tuscola/Huron GMU--The Canada goose season will close after 50
days or when 750 birds have been harvested, whichever occurs first. The
daily bag limit is 1 Canada goose.
(c) Southern Michigan GMU--A special Canada goose season may be
held between January 5 and February 3. The daily bag limit is 5 Canada
geese.
(d) Central Michigan GMU--A special Canada goose season may be held
between January 5 and February 3. The daily bag limit is 5 Canada
geese.
Minnesota: (a) West Zone
(1) West Central Zone--The season for Canada geese may extend for
40 days. In the Lac Qui Parle Zone, the season will close after 40 days
or when 12,000 birds have been harvested, whichever occurs first.
Throughout the West Central Zone, the daily bag limit is 1 Canada
goose.
(2) Remainder of West Zone--The season for Canada geese may extend
for 40 days. The daily bag limit is 1 Canada goose.
(b) Northwest Zone--The season for Canada geese may extend for 40
days. The daily bag limit is 1 Canada goose.
(c) Remainder of the State--The season for Canada geese may extend
for 70 days. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada geese.
(d) Special Late Canada Goose Season--An experimental special
Canada goose season of up to 10 days may be held in December, except in
the West Central and Lac qui Parle Goose zones. During the special
season, the daily bag limit is 5 Canada geese, except in the Southeast
Goose Zone, where the daily bag limit is 2.
Mississippi: The season for Canada geese may extend for 70 days.
The daily bag limit is 3 Canada geese.
Missouri: (a) Swan Lake Zone--The season for Canada geese may
extend for 70 days, with no more than 30 days occurring after November
30. The season may be split into 3 segments. The daily bag limit is 2
Canada geese.
ese, except in the Southeast
Goose Zone, where the daily bag limit is 2.
Mississippi: The season for Canada geese may extend for 70 days.
The daily bag limit is 3 Canada geese.
Missouri: (a) Swan Lake Zone--The season for Canada geese may
extend for 70 days, with no more than 30 days occurring after November
30. The season may be split into 3 segments. The daily bag limit is 2
Canada geese.
(b) Southeast Zone--The season for Canada geese may extend for 70
days. The season may be split into 3 segments, provided that at least 1
segment occurs prior to December 1. The daily bag limit is 3 Canada
geese through October 31, and 2 Canada geese thereafter.
(c) Remainder of the State--(1) North Zone--The season for Canada
geese may extend for 70 days, with no more than 30 days occurring after
November 30. The season may be split into 3 segments, provided that 1
segment of at least 9 days occurs prior to October 15. The daily bag
limit is 3 Canada geese through October 31, and 2 Canada geese
thereafter.
(2) Middle Zone--The season for Canada geese may extend for 70
days, with no more than 30 days occurring after November 30. The season
may be split into 3 segments, provided that 1 segment of at least 9
days occurs prior to October 15. The daily bag limit is 3 Canada geese
through October 31, and 2 Canada geese thereafter.
(3) South Zone--The season for Canada geese may extend for 70 days.
The season may be split into 3 segments, provided that at least 1
segment occurs prior to December 1. The daily bag limit is 3 Canada
geese through October 31, and 2 Canada geese thereafter.
Ohio: The season for Canada geese may extend for 70 days in the
respective duck-hunting zones, with a daily bag limit of 2 Canada
geese, except in the Lake Erie SJBP Zone, where the season may not
exceed 35 days and the daily bag limit is 1 Canada goose. A special
experimental Canada goose season of up to 22 days, beginning the first
Saturday after January 10, may be held in selected areas of the State
season for Canada geese may extend for 70 days in the
respective duck-hunting zones, with a daily bag limit of 2 Canada
geese, except in the Lake Erie SJBP Zone, where the season may not
exceed 35 days and the daily bag limit is 1 Canada goose. A special
experimental Canada goose season of up to 22 days, beginning the first
Saturday after January 10, may be held in selected areas of the State.
During the special season, the daily bag limit is 2 Canada geese.
Tennessee: (a) Northwest Zone--The season for Canada geese will
close after 65 days or when 4,300 birds have been harvested, whichever
occurs first. The season may extend to February 15. A 3,000-bird
harvest quota will be monitored in the Reelfoot Quota Zone. The
remaining 1,300 quota will be assigned to the area outside the Reelfoot
Zone. If the quota in the Reelfoot Quota Zone is reached prior to
completion of the 65-day season, the season in the entire Northwest
Zone will close. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada geese.
(b) Southwest Zone--The season for Canada geese may extend for 50
days, and the harvest will be limited to 500 birds. The daily bag limit
is 2 Canada geese.
(c) Kentucky/Barkley Lakes Zone--The season for Canada geese may
extend for 50 days. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada geese.
(d) Remainder of the State--The season for Canada geese may extend
for 70 days. The daily bag limit is 2 Canada geese.
Wisconsin: The total harvest of Canada geese in the State will be
limited to 46,000 birds. (a) Horicon Zone--The framework opening date
for all geese is September 17. The harvest of Canada geese is limited
to 16,900 birds. The season may not exceed 94 days. All Canada geese
harvested must be tagged.

The daily bag limit is 1 Canada goose, and the season limit will be the
number of tags issued to each permittee.
l harvest of Canada geese in the State will be
limited to 46,000 birds. (a) Horicon Zone--The framework opening date
for all geese is September 17. The harvest of Canada geese is limited
to 16,900 birds. The season may not exceed 94 days. All Canada geese
harvested must be tagged.

The daily bag limit is 1 Canada goose, and the season limit will be the
number of tags issued to each permittee.
(b) Collins Zone--The framework opening date for all geese is
September 17. The harvest of Canada geese is limited to 600 birds. The
season may not exceed 68 days. All Canada geese harvested must be
tagged. The daily bag limit is 1 Canada goose, and the season limit
will be the number of tags issued to each permittee.
(c) Exterior Zone--The framework opening date for all geese is
September 22. The harvest of Canada geese is limited to 24,000 birds,
with 500 birds allocated to the Mississippi River Subzone. The season
may not exceed 70 days, except in the Mississippi River Subzone, where
the season may not exceed 80 days. The daily bag limit is 1 Canada
goose. In that portion of the Exterior Zone outside the Mississippi
River Subzone, the progress of the harvest must be monitored, and the
season closed, if necessary, to ensure that the harvest does not exceed
24,000 birds.
Additional Limits: In addition to the harvest limits stated for the
respective zones above, an additional 4,500 Canada geese may be taken
in the Horicon Zone under special agricultural permits
of the Exterior Zone outside the Mississippi
River Subzone, the progress of the harvest must be monitored, and the
season closed, if necessary, to ensure that the harvest does not exceed
24,000 birds.
Additional Limits: In addition to the harvest limits stated for the
respective zones above, an additional 4,500 Canada geese may be taken
in the Horicon Zone under special agricultural permits.
Quota Zone Closures: When it has been determined that the quota of
Canada geese allotted to the Northern Illinois, Central Illinois,
Southern Illinois, and Rend Lake Quota Zones in Illinois; Posey County
in Indiana; the Ballard and Henderson-Union Subzones in Kentucky; the
Allegan County, Muskegon Wastewater, Saginaw County, and Tuscola/Huron
Goose Management Units in Michigan; the Lac Qui Parle Zone in
Minnesota; the Northwest Zone in Tennessee; and the Exterior Zone in
Wisconsin will have been filled, the season for taking Canada geese in
the respective zone (and associated area, if applicable) will be closed
by either the Director upon giving public notice through local
information media at least 48 hours in advance of the time and date of
closing, or by the State through State regulations with such notice and
time (not less than 48 hours) as they deem necessary.

Central Flyway

Ducks, Mergansers, and Coots: Outside Dates: Between September 29
and January 20.
Hunting Seasons and Duck Limits:
(1) High Plains Mallard Management Unit (roughly defined as that
portion of the Central Flyway which lies west of the 100th meridian):
97 days, except canvasbacks which may not exceed 25 consecutive days,
and a daily bag limit of 6 ducks, including no more than 5 mallards (no
more than 2 of which may be hens), 1 mottled duck, 1 canvasback, 1
pintail, 2 redheads, 3 scaup, and 2 wood ducks. The last 23 days may
start no earlier than the Saturday nearest December 10 (December 8).
l Flyway which lies west of the 100th meridian):
97 days, except canvasbacks which may not exceed 25 consecutive days,
and a daily bag limit of 6 ducks, including no more than 5 mallards (no
more than 2 of which may be hens), 1 mottled duck, 1 canvasback, 1
pintail, 2 redheads, 3 scaup, and 2 wood ducks. The last 23 days may
start no earlier than the Saturday nearest December 10 (December 8).
(2) Remainder of the Central Flyway: 74 days, except canvasbacks
which may not exceed 25 consecutive days, and a daily bag limit of 6
ducks, including no more than 5 mallards (no more than 2 of which may
be hens), 1 mottled duck, 1 canvasback, 1 pintail, 2 redheads, 3 scaup,
and 2 wood ducks.
Merganser Limits: The daily bag limit is 5 mergansers, only 1 of
which may be a hooded merganser. In States that include mergansers in
the duck daily bag limit, the daily limit may be the same as the duck
bag limit, only one of which may be a hooded merganser.
Coot Limits: The daily bag limit is 15 coots.
Zoning and Split Seasons: Kansas (Low Plains portion), Montana,
Nebraska (Low Plains portion), New Mexico, Oklahoma (Low Plains
portion), South Dakota (Low Plains portion), Texas (Low Plains
portion), and Wyoming may select hunting seasons by zones.
In Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma,
South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming, the regular season may be split into
two segments.
In Colorado, the season may be split into three segments.
Geese: Split Seasons: Seasons for geese may be split into three
segments. Three-way split seasons for Canada geese require Central
Flyway Council and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service approval, and a 3-
year evaluation by each participating State.
Outside Dates: For dark geese, seasons may be selected between the
outside dates of the Saturday nearest October 1 (September 29) and the
Sunday nearest February 15 (February 17). For light geese, outside
dates for seasons may be selected between the Saturday nearest October
1 (September 29) and March 10
Fish and Wildlife Service approval, and a 3-
year evaluation by each participating State.
Outside Dates: For dark geese, seasons may be selected between the
outside dates of the Saturday nearest October 1 (September 29) and the
Sunday nearest February 15 (February 17). For light geese, outside
dates for seasons may be selected between the Saturday nearest October
1 (September 29) and March 10. In the Rainwater Basin Light Goose Area
(East and West) of Nebraska, temporal and spatial restrictions
consistent with the experimental late-winter snow goose hunting
strategy endorsed by the Central Flyway Council in July 1999, are
required.
Season Lengths and Limits:
Light Geese: States may select a light goose season not to exceed
107 days. The daily bag limit for light geese is 20 with no possession
limit.
Dark Geese: In Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South
Dakota, and the Eastern Goose Zone of Texas, States may select a season
for Canada geese (or any other dark goose species except white-fronted
geese) not to exceed 95 days with a daily bag limit of 3. Additionally,
in the Eastern Goose Zone of Texas, an alternative season of 107 days
with a daily bag limit of 1 Canada goose may be selected. For white-
fronted geese, these States may select either a season of 86 days with
a bag limit of 2 or a 107-day season with a bag limit of 1.
In South Dakota, for Canada geese in the Big Stone Power Plant Area
of Dark Goose Unit 1, the daily bag limit is 3 until November 30 and 2
thereafter.
In Colorado, Montana, New Mexico and Wyoming, States may select
seasons not to exceed 107 days. The daily bag limit for dark geese is 5
in the aggregate.
In the Western Goose Zone of Texas, the season may not exceed 107
days. The daily bag limit for Canada geese (or any other dark goose
species except white-fronted geese) is 5. The daily bag limit for
white-fronted geese is 1.

Pacific Flyway
n Colorado, Montana, New Mexico and Wyoming, States may select
seasons not to exceed 107 days. The daily bag limit for dark geese is 5
in the aggregate.
In the Western Goose Zone of Texas, the season may not exceed 107
days. The daily bag limit for Canada geese (or any other dark goose
species except white-fronted geese) is 5. The daily bag limit for
white-fronted geese is 1.

Pacific Flyway

Ducks, Mergansers, Coots, Common Moorhens, and Purple Gallinules:
Hunting Seasons and Duck Limits: Concurrent 107 days and daily bag
limit of 7 ducks and mergansers, including no more than 2 female
mallards, 1 pintail, 4 scaup, 2 redheads. The season on canvasbacks is
closed, except one canvasback may be included in the daily bag for 38
consecutive days within the Pacific Flyway duck season. A single
canvasback may also be included in the 7-bird daily bag limit for
designated youth-hunt days.
The season on coots and common moorhens may be between the outside
dates for the season on ducks, but not to exceed 107 days.
Coot, Common Moorhen, and Purple Gallinule Limits: The daily bag
and possession limits of coots, common moorhens, and purple gallinules
are 25, singly or in the aggregate.
Outside Dates: Between the Saturday nearest October 1 (September
29) and the Sunday nearest January 20 (January 20).
Zoning and Split Seasons: Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada,
Oregon, Utah, and Washington may select hunting seasons by zones.
Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Washington
may split their seasons into two segments.
Colorado, Montana, New Mexico, and Wyoming may split their seasons
into three segments.
Colorado River Zone, California: Seasons and limits shall be the
same as seasons and limits selected in the
ifornia, Idaho, Nevada,
Oregon, Utah, and Washington may select hunting seasons by zones.
Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Washington
may split their seasons into two segments.
Colorado, Montana, New Mexico, and Wyoming may split their seasons
into three segments.
Colorado River Zone, California: Seasons and limits shall be the
same as seasons and limits selected in the

adjacent portion of Arizona (South Zone).
Geese: Season Lengths, Outside Dates, and Limits: Except as
subsequently noted, 100-day seasons may be selected, with outside dates
between the Saturday nearest October 1 (September 29), and the Sunday
nearest January 20 (January 20), and the basic daily bag limits are 3
light geese and 4 dark geese, except in California, Oregon, and
Washington, where the dark goose bag limit does not include brant.
Split Seasons: Unless otherwise specified, seasons for geese may be
split into up to 3 segments. Three-way split seasons for Canada geese
and white-fronted geese require Pacific Flyway Council and U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service approval and a 3-year evaluation by each
participating State.
Brant Season--A 16-consecutive-day season may be selected in
Oregon. A 16-day season may be selected in Washington, and this season
may be split into 2-segments. A 30-consecutive-day season may be
selected in California. In these States, the daily bag limit is 2 brant
and is in addition to dark goose limits.
Arizona: The daily bag limit for dark geese is 3.
California: Northeastern Zone--White-fronted geese and cackling
Canada geese may be taken only during the first 44 days of the goose
season. The daily bag limit is 3 geese and may include no more than 2
dark geese; including not more than 1 cackling Canada goose or 1
Aleutian Canada goose.
Balance-of-the-State Zone--A 79-day season may be selected
na: The daily bag limit for dark geese is 3.
California: Northeastern Zone--White-fronted geese and cackling
Canada geese may be taken only during the first 44 days of the goose
season. The daily bag limit is 3 geese and may include no more than 2
dark geese; including not more than 1 cackling Canada goose or 1
Aleutian Canada goose.
Balance-of-the-State Zone--A 79-day season may be selected. Limits
may not include more than 3 geese per day, of which not more than 2 may
be white-fronted geese and not more than 1 may be a cackling Canada
goose or Aleutian Canada goose. Three areas in the Balance-of-the-State
Zone are restricted in the hunting of certain geese:
(1) In the Counties of Del Norte and Humboldt, there will be no
open season for Canada geese, except for the Special September Canada
goose hunt in Humboldt County.
(2) In the Sacramento Valley Special Management Area (West), the
season on white-fronted geese must end on or before December 14, and,
in the Sacramento Valley Special Management Area (East), there will be
no open season for Canada geese.
(3) In the San Joaquin Valley Special Management Area, there will
be no open season for Canada geese.
Oregon: Except as subsequently noted, the dark goose daily bag
limit is 4, including not more than 1 cackling Canada goose or Aleutian
Canada goose.
Lake County Zone--The daily dark goose bag limit may not include
more than 2 white-fronted geese.
Western Zone--In the Special Canada Goose Management Area, except
for designated areas, there will be no open season on Canada geese. In
the designated areas, individual quotas will be established that
collectively will not exceed 165 dusky Canada geese. See section on
quota zones. In those designated areas, the daily bag limit of dark
geese is 4 and may include no more than 1 Aleutian Canada goose.
Closed Zone: Those portions of Coos and Curry Counties west of US
101 and all of Tillamook and Lincoln Counties
Canada geese. In
the designated areas, individual quotas will be established that
collectively will not exceed 165 dusky Canada geese. See section on
quota zones. In those designated areas, the daily bag limit of dark
geese is 4 and may include no more than 1 Aleutian Canada goose.
Closed Zone: Those portions of Coos and Curry Counties west of US
101 and all of Tillamook and Lincoln Counties.
Washington: The daily bag limit is 4 geese, including 4 dark geese
but not more than 3 light geese.
Southwest Quota Zone--In the Special Goose Management Area, except
for designated areas, there will be no open season on Canada geese. In
the designated areas, individual quotas will be established that
collectively will not exceed 85 dusky Canada geese. See section on
quota zones. In this area, the daily bag limit of dark geese is 4 and
may include 4 cackling Canada geese. In Southwest Quota Zone Area 2B
(Pacific and Grays Harbor Counties) the dark goose bag limit may
include 1 Aleutian Canada goose.
Colorado: The daily bag limit for dark geese is 3 geese.
Idaho: Northern Unit--The daily bag limit is 4 geese, including 4
dark geese, but not more than 3 light geese.
Southwest Unit and Southeastern Unit--The daily bag limit on dark
geese is 4.
Montana: West of Divide Zone and East of Divide Zone--The daily bag
limit of dark geese is 4.
Nevada: The daily bag limit for dark geese is 3 except in the
Lincoln and Clark County Zone, where the daily bag limit of dark geese
is 2.
New Mexico: The daily bag limit of dark geese is 3.
Utah: The daily bag limit for dark geese is 3 geese.
Wyoming: The daily bag limit is 4 dark geese.
Quota Zones: Seasons on dark geese must end upon attainment of
individual quotas of dusky Canada geese allotted to the designated
areas of Oregon and Washington
the
Lincoln and Clark County Zone, where the daily bag limit of dark geese
is 2.
New Mexico: The daily bag limit of dark geese is 3.
Utah: The daily bag limit for dark geese is 3 geese.
Wyoming: The daily bag limit is 4 dark geese.
Quota Zones: Seasons on dark geese must end upon attainment of
individual quotas of dusky Canada geese allotted to the designated
areas of Oregon and Washington. The September Canada goose season, the
regular goose season, any special late dark goose season, and any
extended falconry season, combined, must not exceed 107 days, and the
established quota of dusky Canada geese must not be exceeded. Hunting
of dark geese in those designated areas will only be by hunters
possessing a State-issued permit authorizing them to do so. In a
Service-approved investigation, the State must obtain quantitative
information on hunter compliance of those regulations aimed at reducing
the take of dusky Canada geese. If the monitoring program cannot be
conducted, for any reason, the season must immediately close. In the
designated areas of the Washington Quota Zone, a special late dark
goose season may be held between the Saturday following the close of
the general goose season and March 10. In the Special Canada Goose
Management Area of Oregon, the framework closing date is extended to
the Sunday closest to March 1 (March 3). Regular dark goose seasons may
be split into 3 segments within the Oregon and Washington quota zones.
The 3-way split seasons are considered experimental for this year. An
evaluation of the 3-way split seasons is required and must be submitted
by July 2002.
Swans: In designated areas of Utah, Nevada, and the Pacific Flyway
portion of Montana, an open season for taking a limited number of swans
may be selected. Permits will be issued by States and will authorize
each permittee to take no more than 1 swan per season. The season may
open no earlier than the Saturday nearest October 1 (September 29)
s is required and must be submitted
by July 2002.
Swans: In designated areas of Utah, Nevada, and the Pacific Flyway
portion of Montana, an open season for taking a limited number of swans
may be selected. Permits will be issued by States and will authorize
each permittee to take no more than 1 swan per season. The season may
open no earlier than the Saturday nearest October 1 (September 29). The
States must implement a harvest-monitoring program to measure the
species composition of the swan harvest. In Utah and Nevada, the
harvest-monitoring program must require that all harvested swans or
their species-determinant parts be examined by either State or Federal
biologists for the purpose of species classification. All States should
use appropriate measures to maximize hunter compliance in providing
bagged swans for examination or, in the case of Montana, reporting
bill-measurement and color information. All States must achieve at
least an 80-percent compliance rate, or subsequent permits will be
reduced by 10 percent. All States must provide to the Service by June
30, 2002, a report covering harvest, hunter participation, reporting
compliance, and monitoring of swan populations in the designated hunt
areas. These seasons will be subject to the following conditions:
In Utah, no more than 2,000 permits may be issued. The season must
end no later than the second Sunday in December (December 9) or upon
attainment of 10 trumpeter swans in the harvest, whichever occurs
earliest. Utah must enter into a Memorandum of Agreement with the
Service regarding harvest monitoring, season closure procedures, and
education requirements for swan seasons in Utah.
ditions:
In Utah, no more than 2,000 permits may be issued. The season must
end no later than the second Sunday in December (December 9) or upon
attainment of 10 trumpeter swans in the harvest, whichever occurs
earliest. Utah must enter into a Memorandum of Agreement with the
Service regarding harvest monitoring, season closure procedures, and
education requirements for swan seasons in Utah.

In Nevada, no more than 650 permits may be issued. The season must
end no later than the Sunday following January 1 (January 6) or upon
attainment of 5 trumpeter swans in the harvest, whichever occurs
earliest.
In Montana, no more than 500 permits may be issued. The season must
end no later than December 1.
Tundra Swans: In the Central Flyway portion of Montana, and in
North Carolina, North Dakota, South Dakota (east of the Missouri
River), and Virginia, an open season for taking a limited number of
tundra swans may be selected. Permits will be issued by States that
authorize the take of no more than 1 tundra swan per permit. A second
permit may be issued to hunters from unused permits remaining after the
first drawing. The States must obtain harvest and hunter participation
data. These seasons will be subject to the following conditions:

In the Atlantic Flyway

--The season will be experimental.
--The season may be 90 days, from October 1 to January 31.
--In North Carolina, no more than 5,000 permits may be issued.
--In Virginia, no more than 600 permits may be issued.

In the Central Flyway

--The season may be 107 days, from the Saturday nearest October 1
(September 29) to January 31.
--In the Central Flyway portion of Montana, no more than 500 permits
may be issued.
--In North Dakota, no more than 2,000 permits may be issued.
--In South Dakota, no more than 1,500 permits may be issued.

Area, Unit, and Zone Descriptions Ducks (Including Mergansers) and
Coots

Atlantic Flyway
way

--The season may be 107 days, from the Saturday nearest October 1
(September 29) to January 31.
--In the Central Flyway portion of Montana, no more than 500 permits
may be issued.
--In North Dakota, no more than 2,000 permits may be issued.
--In South Dakota, no more than 1,500 permits may be issued.

Area, Unit, and Zone Descriptions Ducks (Including Mergansers) and
Coots

Atlantic Flyway

Connecticut: North Zone: That portion of the State north of I-95.
South Zone: Remainder of the State.
Maine: North Zone: That portion north of the line extending east
along Maine State Highway 110 from the New Hampshire and Maine border
to the intersection of Maine State Highway 11 in Newfield; then north
and east along Route 11 to the intersection of U.S. Route 202 in
Auburn; then north and east on Route 202 to the intersection of
Interstate Highway 95 in Augusta; then north and east along I-95 to
Route 15 in Bangor; then east along Route 15 to Route 9; then east
along Route 9 to Stony Brook in Baileyville; then east along Stony
Brook to the United States border.
South Zone: Remainder of the State.
Massachusetts: Western Zone: That portion of the State west of a
line extending south from the Vermont border on I-91 to MA 9, west on
MA 9 to MA 10, south on MA 10 to U.S. 202, south on U.S. 202 to the
Connecticut border.
Central Zone: That portion of the State east of the Berkshire Zone
and west of a line extending south from the New Hampshire border on I-
95 to U.S. 1, south on U.S. 1 to I-93, south on I-93 to MA 3, south on
MA 3 to U.S. 6, west on U.S. 6 to MA 28, west on MA 28 to I-195, west
to the Rhode Island border; except the waters, and the lands 150 yards
inland from the high-water mark, of the Assonet River upstream to the
MA 24 bridge, and the Taunton River upstream to the Center St.-Elm St.
bridge shall be in the Coastal Zone.
Coastal Zone: That portion of Massachusetts east and south of the
Central Zone
3 to U.S. 6, west on U.S. 6 to MA 28, west on MA 28 to I-195, west
to the Rhode Island border; except the waters, and the lands 150 yards
inland from the high-water mark, of the Assonet River upstream to the
MA 24 bridge, and the Taunton River upstream to the Center St.-Elm St.
bridge shall be in the Coastal Zone.
Coastal Zone: That portion of Massachusetts east and south of the
Central Zone.
New Hampshire: Coastal Zone: That portion of the State east of a
line extending west from the Maine border in Rollinsford on NH 4 to the
city of Dover, south to NH 108, south along NH 108 through Madbury,
Durham, and Newmarket to NH 85 in Newfields, south to NH 101 in Exeter,
east to NH 51 (Exeter-Hampton Expressway), east to I-95 (New Hampshire
Turnpike) in Hampton, and south along I-95 to the Massachusetts border.
Inland Zone: That portion of the State north and west of the above
boundary and along the Massachusetts border crossing the Connecticut
River to Interstate 91 and northward in Vermont to Route 2, east to
102, northward to the Canadian border.
New Jersey: Coastal Zone: That portion of the State seaward of a
line beginning at the New York border in Raritan Bay and extending west
along the New York border to NJ 440 at Perth Amboy; west on NJ 440 to
the Garden State Parkway; south on the Garden State Parkway to the
shoreline at Cape May and continuing to the Delaware border in Delaware
Bay.
North Zone: That portion of the State west of the Coastal Zone and
north of a line extending west from the Garden State Parkway on NJ 70
to the New Jersey Turnpike, north on the turnpike to U.S. 206, north on
U.S. 206 to U.S. 1 at Trenton, west on U.S. 1 to the Pennsylvania
border in the Delaware River.
South Zone: That portion of the State not within the North Zone or
the Coastal Zone.
New York: Lake Champlain Zone: The U.S. portion of Lake Champlain
and that area east and north of a line extending along NY 9B from the
Canadian border to U.S. 9, south along U.S
he turnpike to U.S. 206, north on
U.S. 206 to U.S. 1 at Trenton, west on U.S. 1 to the Pennsylvania
border in the Delaware River.
South Zone: That portion of the State not within the North Zone or
the Coastal Zone.
New York: Lake Champlain Zone: The U.S. portion of Lake Champlain
and that area east and north of a line extending along NY 9B from the
Canadian border to U.S. 9, south along U.S. 9 to NY 22 south of
Keesville; south along NY 22 to the west shore of South Bay, along and
around the shoreline of South Bay to NY 22 on the east shore of South
Bay; southeast along NY 22 to U.S. 4, northeast along U.S. 4 to the
Vermont border.
Long Island Zone: That area consisting of Nassau County, Suffolk
County, that area of Westchester County southeast of I-95, and their
tidal waters.
Western Zone: That area west of a line extending from Lake Ontario
east along the north shore of the Salmon River to I-81, and south along
I-81 to the Pennsylvania border.
Northeastern Zone: That area north of a line extending from Lake
Ontario east along the north shore of the Salmon River to I-81 to NY
31, east along NY 31 to NY 13, north along NY 13 to NY 49, east along
NY 49 to NY 365, east along NY 365 to NY 28, east along NY 28 to NY 29,
east along NY 29 to I-87, north along I-87 to U.S. 9 (at Exit 20),
north along U.S. 9 to NY 149, east along NY 149 to U.S. 4, north along
U.S. 4 to the Vermont border, exclusive of the Lake Champlain Zone.
Southeastern Zone: The remaining portion of New York.
Pennsylvania: Lake Erie Zone: The Lake Erie waters of Pennsylvania
and a shoreline margin along Lake Erie from New York on the east to
Ohio on the west extending 150 yards inland, but including all of
Presque Isle Peninsula.
Northwest Zone: The area bounded on the north by the Lake Erie Zone
and including all of Erie and Crawford Counties and those portions of
Mercer and Venango Counties north of I-80
ia: Lake Erie Zone: The Lake Erie waters of Pennsylvania
and a shoreline margin along Lake Erie from New York on the east to
Ohio on the west extending 150 yards inland, but including all of
Presque Isle Peninsula.
Northwest Zone: The area bounded on the north by the Lake Erie Zone
and including all of Erie and Crawford Counties and those portions of
Mercer and Venango Counties north of I-80.
North Zone: That portion of the State east of the Northwest Zone
and north of a line extending east on I-80 to U.S. 220, Route 220 to I-
180, I-180 to I-80, and I-80 to the Delaware River.
South Zone: The remaining portion of Pennsylvania.
Vermont: Lake Champlain Zone: The U.S. portion of Lake Champlain
and that area north and west of the line extending from the New York
border along U.S. 4 to VT 22A at Fair Haven; VT 22A to U.S. 7 at
Vergennes; U.S. 7 to the Canadian border.
Interior Zone: That portion of Vermont west of the Lake Champlain
Zone and eastward of a line extending from the Massachusetts border at
Interstate 91; north along Interstate 91 to US 2; east along US 2 to VT
102; north along VT 102 to VT 253; north along VT 253 to the Canadian
border.
Connecticut River Zone: The remaining portion of Vermont east of
the Interior Zone.

West Virginia: Zone 1: That portion outside the boundaries in Zone
2.
Zone 2 (Allegheny Mountain Upland): That area bounded by a line
extending south along U.S. 220 through Keyser to U.S. 50; U.S. 50 to WV
93; WV 93 south to WV 42; WV 42 south to Petersburg; WV 28 south to
Minnehaha Springs; WV 39 west to U.S. 219; U.S. 219 south to I-64; I-64
west to U.S. 60; U.S. 60 west to U.S. 19; U.S. 19 north to I-79, I-79
north to I-68; I-68 east to the Maryland border; and along the border
to the point of beginning.

Mississippi Flyway
ending south along U.S. 220 through Keyser to U.S. 50; U.S. 50 to WV
93; WV 93 south to WV 42; WV 42 south to Petersburg; WV 28 south to
Minnehaha Springs; WV 39 west to U.S. 219; U.S. 219 south to I-64; I-64
west to U.S. 60; U.S. 60 west to U.S. 19; U.S. 19 north to I-79, I-79
north to I-68; I-68 east to the Maryland border; and along the border
to the point of beginning.

Mississippi Flyway

Alabama: South Zone: Mobile and Baldwin Counties.
North Zone: The remainder of Alabama.
Illinois: North Zone: That portion of the State north of a line
extending east from the Iowa border along Illinois Highway 92 to
Interstate Highway 280, east along I-280 to I-80, then east along I-80
to the Indiana border.
Central Zone: That portion of the State south of the North Zone to
a line extending east from the Missouri border along the Modoc Ferry
route to Modoc Ferry Road, east along Modoc Ferry Road to Modoc Road,
northeasterly along Modoc Road and St. Leo's Road to Illinois Highway
3, north along Illinois 3 to Illinois 159, north along Illinois 159 to
Illinois 161, east along Illinois 161 to Illinois 4, north along
Illinois 4 to Interstate Highway 70, east along I-70 to the Bond County
line, north and east along the Bond County line to Fayette County,
north and east along the Fayette County line to Effingham County, east
and south along the Effingham County line to I-70, then east along I-70
to the Indiana border.
South Zone: The remainder of Illinois.
Indiana: North Zone: That portion of the State north of a line
extending east from the Illinois border along State Road 18 to U.S.
Highway 31, north along U.S. 31 to U.S. 24, east along U.S. 24 to
Huntington, then southeast along U.S. 224 to the Ohio border
t
and south along the Effingham County line to I-70, then east along I-70
to the Indiana border.
South Zone: The remainder of Illinois.
Indiana: North Zone: That portion of the State north of a line
extending east from the Illinois border along State Road 18 to U.S.
Highway 31, north along U.S. 31 to U.S. 24, east along U.S. 24 to
Huntington, then southeast along U.S. 224 to the Ohio border.
Ohio River Zone: That portion of the State south of a line
extending east from the Illinois border along Interstate Highway 64 to
New Albany, east along State Road 62 to State Road 56, east along State
Road 56 to Vevay, east and north on State 156 along the Ohio River to
North Landing, north along State 56 to U.S. Highway 50, then northeast
along U.S. 50 to the Ohio border.
South Zone: That portion of the State between the North and Ohio
River Zone boundaries.
Iowa: North Zone: That portion of the State north of a line
extending east from the Nebraska border along State Highway 175 to
State Highway 37, southeast along State Highway 37 to U.S. Highway 59,
south along U.S. 59 to Interstate Highway 80, then east along I-80 to
the Illinois border.
South Zone: The remainder of Iowa.
Kentucky: West Zone: All counties west of and including Butler,
Daviess, Ohio, Simpson, and Warren Counties.
East Zone: The remainder of Kentucky.
Louisiana: West Zone: That portion of the State west and south of a
line extending south from the Arkansas border along Louisiana Highway 3
to Bossier City, east along Interstate Highway 20 to Minden, south
along Louisiana 7 to Ringgold, east along Louisiana 4 to Jonesboro,
south along U.S. Highway 167 to Lafayette, southeast along U.S. 90 to
the Mississippi State line.
East Zone: The remainder of Louisiana.
Catahoula Lake Area: All of Catahoula Lake, including those
portions known locally as Round Prairie, Catfish Prairie, and Frazier's
Arm. See State regulations for additional information.
Michigan: North Zone: The Upper Peninsula
g Louisiana 4 to Jonesboro,
south along U.S. Highway 167 to Lafayette, southeast along U.S. 90 to
the Mississippi State line.
East Zone: The remainder of Louisiana.
Catahoula Lake Area: All of Catahoula Lake, including those
portions known locally as Round Prairie, Catfish Prairie, an

[Text truncated at 120,000 characters. The full text is on the page linked above.]

## Nearby sections

- [66 FR 59 Airworthiness Directives; Eagle Aircraft Pty. Ltd. Model 150B Airplanes](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_00-33403.md)
- [66 FR 61 Airworthiness Directives; PIAGGIO AERO INDUSTRIES S.p.A Model P-180 Airplanes](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_00-33404.md)
- [66 FR 341 Software Defined Radios](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_01-63.md)
- [66 FR 968 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Head Restraints](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_01-136.md)
- [66 FR 1059 Federal Old-Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income for the Aged, Blind, and Disabled; Scheduling Video Teleconference Hearings Before Administrative Law Judges](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_01-319.md)
- [66 FR 1273 Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Models 172N, 172P, R172K, 172RG, F172N, F172P, FR172J, and FR172K Airplanes](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_01-343.md)
- [66 FR 1283 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_01-88.md)
- [66 FR 1607 Airworthiness Directives; DG Flugzeugbau GmbH Model DG-800B Sailplanes](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_01-509.md)
- [66 FR 1618 Approval of the Clean Air Act, Section 112(l) Program and Delegation of Authority to the State of Oklahoma](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_01-111.md)
- [66 FR 1917 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, B4-605R, B4-622R, and F4-605R (A300-600) Airplanes](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_01-660.md)
- [66 FR 1923 Tax Treatment of Cafeteria Plans](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_01-259.md)
- [66 FR 1923 Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Miami River, Miami, Dade County, FL](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_01-762.md)
- [66 FR 2395 Digital Television Broadcast Service; Jacksonville, NC](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_01-678.md)
- [66 FR 2767 Safety Requirements for Operators of Small Passenger-Carrying Commercial Motor Vehicles Used In Interstate Commerce](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_01-764.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/FR_PRORULE_01-21654. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.
