# CFTC Letter No. 24-01: No-action relief for LCH SA with regard to Regulations 1.20(g)(4) and 22.5, and an exemption from the requirements of Regulation 1.49(d)(3) for customer accounts held at the Banque de France

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L24_01

## Section

- **Citation:** CFTC Letter No. 24-01
- **Heading:** No-action relief for LCH SA with regard to Regulations 1.20(g)(4) and 22.5, and an exemption from the requirements of Regulation 1.49(d)(3) for customer accounts held at the Banque de France
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** CFTC Staff Letters (2008-present) / No-action relief for LCH SA with regard to Regulations 1.20(g)(4) and 22.5, and an exemption from the requirements of Regulation 1.49(d)(3) for customer accounts held at the Banque de France.

## Text

Summary: No-action relief for LCH SA with regard to Regulations 1.20(g)(4) and 22.5, and an exemption from the requirements of Regulation 1.49(d)(3) for customer accounts held at the Banque de France.

CFTC Letter No. 24-01 No-Action, Exemption January 16, 2024

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5430
Facsimile: (202) 418-5547
c_hutchison@cftc.gov

Division of Clearing and Risk

Clark Hutchison
Director

Corentine Poilvet-Clédière
Chief Executive Officer
LCH SA
18 rue du Quatre Septembre
Paris, France 75002

RE:
Request for No-Action Letter with regard to Section 4d(f) of the Commodity Exchange
Act and Commission Regulations 1.20(g)(4) and 22.5; Request for Exemptive Letter with
regard to Commission Regulation 1.49(d)(3)

Dear Ms. Poilvet-Clédière:

This is in response to your letter dated September 8, 2023 (“Letter”), to the Division of
Clearing and Risk (“Division”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(“Commission”). In the Letter, you request that the Division confirm that it will not recommend
that the Commission take enforcement action against LCH SA (“LCH”) for failing to obtain, or
provide the Commission with, an executed version of the template acknowledgment letter set
forth in Appendix B to Regulation 1.20 (“Template Acknowledgment Letter”), as required by
Regulations 1.20(g)(4) and 22.5, for customer accounts maintained at the Banque de France
(“BdF”). You additionally request that, in connection with holding customer funds at the BdF,
the Division grant an exemption from the requirements of Regulation 1.49(d)(3)(i), thereby
permitting the BdF to hold customer funds, notwithstanding the fact that it does not hold
regulatory capital.

I
Regulations 1.20(g)(4) and 22.5, for customer accounts maintained at the Banque de France
(“BdF”). You additionally request that, in connection with holding customer funds at the BdF,
the Division grant an exemption from the requirements of Regulation 1.49(d)(3)(i), thereby
permitting the BdF to hold customer funds, notwithstanding the fact that it does not hold
regulatory capital.

I.
No-Action Letter regarding the Written Acknowledgment Requirements in
Commission Regulations 1.20(g)(4) and 22.5

Regulations 1.20(g)(4) and 22.5 require, among other things, that a derivatives clearing
organization (“DCO”) obtain a Template Acknowledgment Letter from each depository with
which the DCO deposits futures customer funds or cleared swaps customer funds.1 By letter

1 See Enhancing Protections Afforded Customers and Customer Funds Held by Futures Commission
Merchants and Derivatives Clearing Organizations, 78 Fed. Reg. 68,506 (Nov. 14, 2013). Regulation

Ms. Corentine Poilvet-Clédière
January 16, 2024
Page 2

dated September 8, 2023, LCH informed the Division that the BdF, a depository with which
LCH seeks to maintain customer accounts, had indicated that it required certain modifications to
the Template Acknowledgment Letter.

A. Statement of Facts

The Division understands the relevant facts to be as follows:

In addition to its registration with the Commission as a DCO, LCH is also a clearing
agency regulated by the Securities Exchange Commission and an authorized central clearing
counterparty under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation regulated by the Autorité de
Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution, the BdF, and the Autorité des Marchés Financiers
s the relevant facts to be as follows:

In addition to its registration with the Commission as a DCO, LCH is also a clearing
agency regulated by the Securities Exchange Commission and an authorized central clearing
counterparty under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation regulated by the Autorité de
Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution, the BdF, and the Autorité des Marchés Financiers. As the
central bank of the French Republic, the BdF is the issuer of bank notes within France, holds the
French exchange reserves in gold and foreign currency, exercises the sovereign functions of
overseeing market infrastructure, payment systems and credit institutions, and acts as lender of
last resort. Under French law, the BdF may not be made insolvent.

LCH seeks to maintain accounts at the BdF into which LCH may deposit customer funds.
In this regard, the BdF has indicated to LCH that it requires certain modifications to the
Template Acknowledgment Letter associated with such accounts.

B. Discussion of Request for No-Action Letter and Applicable Legal Requirements

The Division notes that the BdF is a central bank for a money center country, which the
Commission has recognized as a permissible location for a depository holding customer funds.2
As a central bank, the BdF’s provision of account services to LCH is distinguishable from the
provision of account services by a commercial bank
of Request for No-Action Letter and Applicable Legal Requirements

The Division notes that the BdF is a central bank for a money center country, which the
Commission has recognized as a permissible location for a depository holding customer funds.2
As a central bank, the BdF’s provision of account services to LCH is distinguishable from the
provision of account services by a commercial bank. In adopting the Template Acknowledgment
Letter requirements, the Commission explicitly recognized the “unique role of the Federal
Reserve Bank” in excluding Federal Reserve Banks, when providing account services, from the
requirement that depositories accepting customer funds from DCOs execute a Template
Acknowledgment Letter.3

Further, the Commission contemplated the possibility that foreign depositories might
require modifications to the Template Acknowledgment Letter in certain situations, in which

22.5 applies the Template Acknowledgment Letter requirements of Regulation 1.20(g)(4) to DCOs in
connection with the holding of cleared swaps customer collateral.
2 See Regulation 1.49(a)(1) (defining “money center country”).
3 See 78 Fed. Reg. at 68,535. The Commission subsequently issued an exemption under Section 4(c) of
the Commodity Exchange Act which exempts, in part, the Federal Reserve Banks from requirements
relating to the provision of customer accounts. Order Exempting the Federal Reserve Banks From
Sections 4d and 22 of the Commodity Exchange Act, 81 Fed. Reg. 53,467 (Aug. 12, 2016).
ter country”).
3 See 78 Fed. Reg. at 68,535. The Commission subsequently issued an exemption under Section 4(c) of
the Commodity Exchange Act which exempts, in part, the Federal Reserve Banks from requirements
relating to the provision of customer accounts. Order Exempting the Federal Reserve Banks From
Sections 4d and 22 of the Commodity Exchange Act, 81 Fed. Reg. 53,467 (Aug. 12, 2016).

Ms. Corentine Poilvet-Clédière
January 16, 2024
Page 3

case the Commission would consider “alternative approaches” on a case-by-case basis.4 In
recognition of this issue, the Division previously issued no-action letters to DCOs in connection
with the holding of customer funds at the Bank of Canada, Deutsche Bundesbank, and the Bank of
England.5 In light of the above, the Division has had discussions with the BdF regarding a
mutually acceptable version of the Template Acknowledgment Letter, i.e., the BdF
Acknowledgment Letter, set forth in an attachment to this letter.

The Division further notes that both Title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Act and the CPMI-
IOSCO Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (“PFMIs”)6 support central banks acting
as depositories for customer funds, due to certain favorable policy considerations. The BdF, in
its capacity as a central bank for a money center country, does not present the same types of risks
as traditional commercial banks, as it serves in the public interest and operates with the goal of
maintaining stability in the financial markets. Further, deposits at a central bank have the lowest
credit risk and are the source of liquidity with regard to their currency of issue;7 LCH would,
therefore, face much lower credit and liquidity risk with a deposit at the BdF than it would with a
deposit at a commercial bank. Thus, granting the requested no-action letter is appropriate to
permit LCH to maintain customer accounts at the BdF.

C
r, deposits at a central bank have the lowest
credit risk and are the source of liquidity with regard to their currency of issue;7 LCH would,
therefore, face much lower credit and liquidity risk with a deposit at the BdF than it would with a
deposit at a commercial bank. Thus, granting the requested no-action letter is appropriate to
permit LCH to maintain customer accounts at the BdF.

C. Terms and Conditions set forth in the BdF Acknowledgment Letter

The BdF Acknowledgment Letter incorporates essential provisions of the Template
Acknowledgment Letter and includes certain provisions that are specific to the customer
accounts maintained at the BdF. Specifically, paragraph 1 of the BdF Acknowledgment Letter is
consistent with the first clause of the second paragraph of the Template Acknowledgment Letter,
stating that LCH has informed the BdF that it has opened the accounts for the purpose of
depositing customer funds, as required by Commission regulations. Paragraph 2 of the BdF
Acknowledgment Letter identifies the subject matter of the letter and makes no substantive
change to the first paragraph of the Template Acknowledgment Letter.

4 78 Fed. Reg. at 68,536.
5 See CFTC Letter No. 16-59 (June 21, 2016) (use of a modified acknowledgment letter for customer
accounts maintained by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. at the Bank of Canada); CFTC Letter No.
16-05 (Feb. 1, 2016) (use of a modified acknowledgment letter for customer accounts maintained by
Eurex Clearing AG at Deutsche Bundesbank); and CFTC Letters No. 14-123 (Oct. 8, 2014), and 14-124
(Oct. 8, 2014) (use of a modified acknowledgment letter for customer accounts maintained by ICE Clear
Europe Limited and LCH Ltd, respectively, at the Bank of England).
6 The PFMIs are a set of international risk management standards for financial market infrastructures,
including DCOs, which have been adopted and implemented by many jurisdictions
etters No. 14-123 (Oct. 8, 2014), and 14-124
(Oct. 8, 2014) (use of a modified acknowledgment letter for customer accounts maintained by ICE Clear
Europe Limited and LCH Ltd, respectively, at the Bank of England).
6 The PFMIs are a set of international risk management standards for financial market infrastructures,
including DCOs, which have been adopted and implemented by many jurisdictions.
7 See PFMIs, ¶ 3.9.3 (noting that “[c]entral banks have the lowest credit risk and are the source of
liquidity with regard to their currency of issue”); see also PFMIs, Key Consideration 8 (specifying that a
financial market infrastructure “with access to central bank accounts, payment services, or securities
services should use these services, where practical, to enhance its management of liquidity risk,” which is
consistent with the standards set forth in Section 806(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act, authorizing accounts at a
Federal Reserve Bank for designated financial market utilities). See 12 U.S.C. § 5465(a).

Ms. Corentine Poilvet-Clédière
January 16, 2024
Page 4

Paragraph 3 of the BdF Acknowledgment Letter is consistent with the second and third
clauses of the second paragraph of the Template Acknowledgment Letter, including the
requirement that funds in the accounts be separately accounted for, segregated from LCH’s own
funds, and otherwise treated in accordance with Section 4d of the Commodity Exchange Act
(“CEA”). Paragraph 4 of the BdF Acknowledgment Letter refers to a provision in the account
agreement between LCH and the BdF (“Account Agreement”) in which the BdF waived its right
of set off against the account. This provision is consistent with the third paragraph of the
Template Acknowledgment Letter
funds, and otherwise treated in accordance with Section 4d of the Commodity Exchange Act
(“CEA”). Paragraph 4 of the BdF Acknowledgment Letter refers to a provision in the account
agreement between LCH and the BdF (“Account Agreement”) in which the BdF waived its right
of set off against the account. This provision is consistent with the third paragraph of the
Template Acknowledgment Letter.

Paragraph 5 of the BdF Acknowledgment Letter provides that the BdF will, as soon as
reasonably practicable, reply to any request for confirmation of account balances or provision of
any other information regarding or related to the account from the Division of Clearing and Risk
or the Market Participants Division. This provision deviates from the fourth paragraph of the
Template Acknowledgment Letter in one respect, i.e., the BdF is to provide a response “as soon
as reasonably practicable” rather than “promptly.” This change is intended to take into account
such circumstances as time zone differences and French bank holidays which could impact the
timing of the BdF’s response.

Paragraph 6 of the BdF Acknowledgment Letter is consistent with the sixth paragraph of
the Template Acknowledgment Letter, specifying that LCH will not hold the BdF responsible for
acting pursuant to Commission inquiries in paragraph 5. Finally, paragraph 7 of the BdF
Acknowledgment Letter clarifies that except for the BdF’s commitment to waive its right of set
off against the account in paragraph 4 and to respond to Commission inquiries in paragraph 5,
the BdF Acknowledgment Letter is not intended to amend the Account Agreement. This
provision also acknowledges that the BdF is not making any representations as to LCH’s
representations in the BdF Acknowledgment Letter, e.g., the funds in the account are customer
funds and LCH is treating them in accordance with Section 4d of the CEA.

D
pond to Commission inquiries in paragraph 5,
the BdF Acknowledgment Letter is not intended to amend the Account Agreement. This
provision also acknowledges that the BdF is not making any representations as to LCH’s
representations in the BdF Acknowledgment Letter, e.g., the funds in the account are customer
funds and LCH is treating them in accordance with Section 4d of the CEA.

D. Grant of No-Action Letter

Based on the facts presented and the representations LCH has made, the Division will not
recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against LCH for executing, and
submitting to the Commission, the BdF Acknowledgment Letter, in place of the Template
Acknowledgment Letter.

The positions taken herein represent the views of the Division only, and do not
necessarily represent the position or view of the Commission or of any other office or division of
the Commission. The staff positions taken in this letter do not excuse persons relying on it from
compliance with any other applicable requirements contained in the CEA or in Commission
regulations. Further, this letter, and the positions taken herein, are based upon the facts and
circumstances presented to the Division. Any different, changed, or omitted material facts or
circumstances might render the staff positions taken in this letter void.

II.
Exemption from the Requirements of Commission Regulation 1.49(d)(3)
e requirements contained in the CEA or in Commission
regulations. Further, this letter, and the positions taken herein, are based upon the facts and
circumstances presented to the Division. Any different, changed, or omitted material facts or
circumstances might render the staff positions taken in this letter void.

II.
Exemption from the Requirements of Commission Regulation 1.49(d)(3)

Ms. Corentine Poilvet-Clédière
January 16, 2024
Page 5

In the context of maintaining customer accounts at the BdF, LCH has requested that the
Division grant an exemption from Regulation 1.49(d)(3) to permit LCH to hold customer funds
at the BdF. Regulation 1.49(d)(3) provides that, in order to hold customer funds with a
depository located outside of the United States, the depository must be: (i) a bank or trust
company that has in excess of $1 billion of regulatory capital, (ii) a registered futures
commission merchant, or (iii) a DCO.8 The Division finds that Regulation 1.49(d)(3)(i)
unintentionally precludes the BdF from acting as a depository for customer funds,
notwithstanding that it is a central bank for a money center country, because the BdF cannot
satisfy the regulatory capital requirement. Nonetheless, based on the following analysis, the
Division is granting an exemption to LCH from the requirements of Regulation 1.49(d)(3).

In adopting Regulation 1.49, the Commission sought to address the various types of risks
that arise in the context of holding customer funds with a depository. In requiring that a non-
U.S. bank or trust company have at least $1 billion in regulatory capital, the Commission sought
to ensure that customer funds would not be deposited with a small commercial bank or trust
company, which, because of its size, would be unlikely to have the financial or operational
resources to adequately administer customer accounts
ding customer funds with a depository. In requiring that a non-
U.S. bank or trust company have at least $1 billion in regulatory capital, the Commission sought
to ensure that customer funds would not be deposited with a small commercial bank or trust
company, which, because of its size, would be unlikely to have the financial or operational
resources to adequately administer customer accounts. The $1 billion regulatory capital
requirement, therefore, serves as a proxy for a bank or trust company’s suitability as a depository
for customer funds, both in terms of financial strength and operational sophistication. The BdF,
while it has adequate financial and operational resources to properly handle customer funds,9
does not technically satisfy the $1 billion regulatory capital requirement. Regulatory capital
consists of the capital required pursuant to a depository’s regulatory regime, and is typically
composed of Tier 1 capital (i.e., common stock). Unlike commercial banks, central banks, like
the BdF, are not held to regulatory capital requirements. Therefore, because the BdF does not,
by definition, satisfy the requirements of Regulation 1.49(d)(3)(i), the Division finds that an
exemption is appropriate to address the preclusive effect of the regulation’s plain meaning.

The Division notes that Section 4d of the CEA, which establishes segregation
requirements for futures and cleared swaps customer funds, similarly refers to “a bank or trust
company” or “any depository institution,” without distinguishing between a commercial or
central bank, a large or small depository, or a depository located in the United States or in a
foreign country.10 In addition, Regulation 1.49(c)(1)(ii) permits customer funds to be held in a
depository located in France.11 Section 4d of the CEA and Regulation 1.49(c)(1)(ii) can be read

8 17 C.F.R. § 1.49(d)(3).
9 The BdF holds reserves of 2,436 tonnes of gold valued at approximately 133.6 billion Euros
ed in the United States or in a
foreign country.10 In addition, Regulation 1.49(c)(1)(ii) permits customer funds to be held in a
depository located in France.11 Section 4d of the CEA and Regulation 1.49(c)(1)(ii) can be read

8 17 C.F.R. § 1.49(d)(3).
9 The BdF holds reserves of 2,436 tonnes of gold valued at approximately 133.6 billion Euros. See BdF
Annual Report (2022), available at https://publications.banque-france.fr/sites/default/files/medias/
documents/arbf-2022_accounts_web.pdf.
10 7 U.S.C. § 6d.
11 Regulation 1.49(c)(1)(ii) provides that customer funds may be held in a depository located in a money
center country, which is defined to include France. See Regulation 1.49(a)(1) (defining “money center
country”).

Ms. Corentine Poilvet-Clédière
January 16, 2024
Page 6

to permit the BdF to act as a depository for customer funds; however, Regulation 1.49(d)(3)(i), in
its reference to regulatory capital, precludes the BdF in this regard.

As discussed in greater detail above,12 there are distinct financial safeguards afforded by
holding customer funds at the BdF, as a central bank for a money center country, that merit an
exemption in this regard. The BdF, in its capacity as a central bank for a money center country,
does not present the same types of risks as traditional commercial banks, as it serves in the public
interest and operates with the goal of maintaining stability in the financial markets. Further,
deposits at a central bank have the lowest credit risk and are the source of liquidity with regard to
their currency of issue; LCH would, therefore, face much lower credit and liquidity risk with a
deposit at the BdF than it would with a deposit at a commercial bank. The Division believes that
granting the exemption would not be contrary to the public interest or to the purposes of
Regulation 1.49(d)(3)
a central bank have the lowest credit risk and are the source of liquidity with regard to
their currency of issue; LCH would, therefore, face much lower credit and liquidity risk with a
deposit at the BdF than it would with a deposit at a commercial bank. The Division believes that
granting the exemption would not be contrary to the public interest or to the purposes of
Regulation 1.49(d)(3). Based on the foregoing, pursuant to delegated authority from the
Commission, the Division hereby grants an exemption to LCH from the requirements of
Regulation 1.49(d)(3) to permit LCH to hold customer funds at the BdF.

This exemption is based upon the representations of LCH and applicable laws and
regulations in their current form; any new, different, or changed material facts or circumstances
might render this exemption void. The positions taken herein do not excuse persons relying on
the exemption from compliance with any other applicable requirements contained in the CEA or
in Commission regulations.

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Gavin Young, Special
Counsel, at gyoung@cftc.gov, or (202) 418-5976.

Sincerely,

Clark Hutchison

Director

Attachment

12 See discussion supra Part I.B. (emphasizing the favorable policy considerations of holding customer
funds at a central bank, as supported by Title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Act and the PFMIs).

## Nearby sections

- [CFTC Letter No. 08-03 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of Eight Futures Contracts Based on Security Indices Derived from the Dow Jones STOXX 600 Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_03.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-05 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the RDXxt USD-RDX Extended Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_05.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-11 Euronext Paris SAs request for no-action relief in connection with the offer and sale in the United States of its futures contracts based on the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Europe Index and the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Euro Zone Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_11.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-13 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contracts Based on the SLI Swiss Leader Index, the Swiss Market Index Midcap, the Dow Jones Eur...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_13.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-15 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight granted exemptive relief from certain of the Part 4 regulations to the registered CPO of a commodity pool, whose shares the CPO intended to publicly offer and to lis...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_15.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-17 DCIO received a request for guidance from the Joint Audit Committee concerning FCM regulatory reporting requirements for investments in a money market mutual fund. The fund had announced that its net asset value per s...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_17.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-18 The Division of Market Oversight issued a letter granting no-action relief to permit the Brazilian Derivatives Exchange, BM&F Bovespa S.A. – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros (BM&F), to make its electronic tradi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_18.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-19 Thailand Futures Exchange Pcls Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the SET50 Index Futures Contract.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_19.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-21 The Division of Market Oversight issued a no-action letter to BNP Paribas confirming that the Division will not recommend that the Commission initiate enforcement action against BNP Paribas or Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., o...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_21.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-02 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partner of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_02.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-06 The CPO of a commodity pool requested that DCIO agree to accept the Annual Report for the period from January 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008 as the Pool’s final annual report despite the fact that the Pool had not f...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_06.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-07 The CPO of a commodity pool with a de minimus amount of its assets embroiled in a bankruptcy requested relief from the ongoing reporting requirements under Part 4. The CPO filed an Annual Report for the Pool for the 2...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_07.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-11 The CPO of two commodity pools requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_11.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-13 The CPO of commodity pool requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_13.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L24_01. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.