# CFTC Letter No. 16-82: No-action position regarding the consolidation of separate risk disclosure statements contained in Regulation 1.55(b) and Appendix A to Regulation 1.55 into a single risk disclosure statement > Federal · Agency guidance · In force URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L16_82 ## Section - **Citation:** CFTC Letter No. 16-82 - **Heading:** No-action position regarding the consolidation of separate risk disclosure statements contained in Regulation 1.55(b) and Appendix A to Regulation 1.55 into a single risk disclosure statement - **Jurisdiction:** Federal - **Kind:** Agency guidance - **Status:** In force - **Text as of:** August 14, 2026 - **Source:** Compiled text - **Location:** CFTC Staff Letters (2008-present) / No-action position regarding the consolidation of separate risk disclosure statements contained in Regulation 1.55(b) and Appendix A to Regulation 1.55 into a single risk disclosure statement ## Text Summary: No-action position regarding the consolidation of separate risk disclosure statements contained in Regulation 1.55(b) and Appendix A to Regulation 1.55 into a single risk disclosure statement U.S. COMMODITY FUTURE S TRADING COMMISSION Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 Telephone: (202) 418-6700 Facsimile: (202) 418-5528 Eileen T. Flaherty Director Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight CFTC Letter No. 16-82 No-Action November 30, 2016 Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight Ms. Allison Lurton Senior Vice President and General Counsel Futures Industry Association 2001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20006 Re: No-Action Position Regarding the Consolidation of Separate Risk Disclosure Statements Contained in Regulation 1.55(b) and Appendix A to Regulation 1.55 into a Single Risk Disclosure Statement Dear Ms. Lurton: This is in response to your letter dated November 15, 2016 to the Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (“DSIO”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”). By your letter, you request, on behalf of the Futures Industry Association’s (“FIA”) member futures commission merchants (“FCMs”) and introducing brokers (“IBs”), and similarly situated FCMs and IBs, confirmation that DSIO would not recommend that the Commission initiate an enforcement action against an FCM or IB that relies upon an updated risk disclosure statement (the “FIA Combined Risk Disclosure Statement”) to comply with the disclosure statement requirements of Commission Regulations 1.55(b), 30.6(a), 33.7(a), and 190.10(c).1 Specifically, you request relief from Regulations 1.55(a) & (b), 30.6(a), 33.7(a), and 190.10(c) such that an FCM or, in the case of an introduced account, an IB may provide its non- institutional customers with the FIA Combined Risk Disclosure Statement, which consolidates into a single document the separate risk disclosur s of Commission Regulations 1.55(b), 30.6(a), 33.7(a), and 190.10(c).1 Specifically, you request relief from Regulations 1.55(a) & (b), 30.6(a), 33.7(a), and 190.10(c) such that an FCM or, in the case of an introduced account, an IB may provide its non- institutional customers with the FIA Combined Risk Disclosure Statement, which consolidates into a single document the separate risk disclosure statements contained in Regulation 1.55(b) and Appendix A of Regulation 1.55, in lieu of providing separate risk disclosure statements.2 1 The Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) may be found at 7 U.S.C. 1 et. seq., and the Commission’s regulations may be found at 17 CFR 1 et. seq. 2 A “non-institutional” customer is defined as a person that does not satisfy the standards of an “eligible contract participant” as set forth in section 1a(18) of the Act. See, Regulation 1.3(g). Ms. Allison Lurton Page| 2 2 I. Regulatory Background Regulations 1.55(a), 30.6(a), 33.7(a), and 190.10(c) require an FCM or IB, as applicable, to provide each non-institutional customer with written risk disclosure statements prior to opening the customer’s account.3 Regulations 1.55(a), 30.6(a), and 33.7(a) further require the FCM or IB to obtain the customer’s signed acknowledgment stating that the customer received and understands the applicable risk disclosure statement. Prior to November 2013, pursuant to Commission Regulation 1.55(c), an FCM or IB could provide customers with the Commission-approved risk disclosure statement set forth in Appendix A to Regulation 1.55 in lieu of the separate risk disclosure statement required by Regulation 1.55(a) or required by Regulations 30.6(a), 33.7(a), and 190.10(c) derstands the applicable risk disclosure statement. Prior to November 2013, pursuant to Commission Regulation 1.55(c), an FCM or IB could provide customers with the Commission-approved risk disclosure statement set forth in Appendix A to Regulation 1.55 in lieu of the separate risk disclosure statement required by Regulation 1.55(a) or required by Regulations 30.6(a), 33.7(a), and 190.10(c). The Commission adopted Appendix A to Regulation 1.55 to “permit firms doing multinational business to use the same risk disclosure statement for foreign and U.S-based business, thereby reducing duplicative disclosure requirements without sacrificing important customer protections or obscuring any special risks of trading outside the U.S.” 4 Appendix A was intended to provide FCMs and IBs with the ability to use a single risk disclosure statement to meet CFTC risk disclosure requirements and to meet the risk disclosure requirements of certain foreign jurisdictions that approved the risk disclosure document.5 In November 2013, the Commission revised the risk disclosures contained in Regulation 1.55(b) as part of a series of amendments enhancing customer protection.6 The Commission did not, however, amend Appendix A to Regulation 1.55. In adopting the amendments to Regulation 1.55(b), the Commission stated that FCMs could continue to use the Appendix A risk disclosure statement provided that the firms also provided non-institutional customers with the revised Regulation 1.55(b) risk disclosure statement.7 3 Regulation 30.6 governs the risk disclosures required to be provided to customers trading foreign futures and foreign options transactions. Regulation 33.7 governs the risk disclosures required to be provided to customers trading domestic, exchange-traded commodity options 3 Regulation 30.6 governs the risk disclosures required to be provided to customers trading foreign futures and foreign options transactions. Regulation 33.7 governs the risk disclosures required to be provided to customers trading domestic, exchange-traded commodity options. Regulation 190.10 governs the risk disclosures required to be provided to customers regarding the treatment of non-cash margin in the event of an FCM’s bankruptcy. Regulation 1.55(b) contains the risk disclosures that an FCM must provide to customers trading domestic futures and options, and includes disclosures for foreign futures and foreign options transactions. An FCM that provides a Regulation 1.55(b) risk disclosure statement to a customer is not required to provide the customer with the separate risk disclosure statement required by Regulation 30.6. See Regulation 30.6(a). 4 See 59 FR 34376 (July 8, 1994). 5 The Appendix A risk disclosure statement has been approved for use by relevant regulatory authorities in Ireland and the United Kingdom in addition to the United States. See, 59 FR 38118. 6 See Enhancing Protections Afforded Customers and Customer Funds Held By Futures Commission Merchants and Derivatives Clearing Organizations, 78 FR 68506 (Nov. 14, 2013). 7 See 77 FR 68506, 68564. See also Regulation 1.55(c). ure statement has been approved for use by relevant regulatory authorities in Ireland and the United Kingdom in addition to the United States. See, 59 FR 38118. 6 See Enhancing Protections Afforded Customers and Customer Funds Held By Futures Commission Merchants and Derivatives Clearing Organizations, 78 FR 68506 (Nov. 14, 2013). 7 See 77 FR 68506, 68564. See also Regulation 1.55(c). Ms. Allison Lurton Page| 3 3 II. Summary of Request for No-Action Position FIA believes that providing two separate risk disclosure statements to non-institutional customers that contain substantially similar risk disclosure information is unnecessary and potentially confusing to customers. To address this issue, and to reduce the paperwork burden on firms, FIA has drafted the FIA Combined Risk Disclosure Statement. The FIA Combined Risk Disclosure Statement consolidates the mandated risk disclosures set forth in revised Regulation 1.55(b) and the substantive additional disclosures contained in Appendix A to Regulation 1.55 into a single risk disclosure statement. III. DSIO No-Action Position Based on the foregoing, DSIO believes that a no-action position is warranted. Accordingly, DSIO will not recommend an enforcement action against an FCM or an IB, in the case of an introduced account, that provides a non-institutional customer with the FIA Combined Risk Disclosure Statement prior to such customer opening an account in lieu of the separate risk disclosure statements specified in Regulations 1.55(b) and (c), 30.6(a), 33.7(a), 190.10(c), and/or Appendix A to Regulation 1.55. This no-action position is subject to the conditions that the FIA Combined Risk Disclosure Statement is provided to non-institutional customers in the manner required by Regulation 1.55. This letter, and the positions taken herein, represent the views of DSIO and do not necessarily represent the positions or views of the Commission or of any other office or division of the Commission 55. This no-action position is subject to the conditions that the FIA Combined Risk Disclosure Statement is provided to non-institutional customers in the manner required by Regulation 1.55. This letter, and the positions taken herein, represent the views of DSIO and do not necessarily represent the positions or views of the Commission or of any other office or division of the Commission. The relief issued by this letter does not excuse persons relying on it from compliance with any other applicable requirements contained in the Act or in the Regulations issued thereunder. This letter does not create or confer any rights or obligations on any person or persons subject to compliance with the Act that bind the Commission or any of its other offices or divisions. As with all no-action letters, DSIO retains the authority to condition further, modify, suspend, terminate, or otherwise restrict the terms of the no-action relief provided herein, at its discretion. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (202) 418-5326, Peter Sanchez, Special Counsel, at (202) 418-5237, or Joshua Beale, Special Counsel, at (202) 418-5446. Very truly yours, Eileen T. Flaherty Director ## Nearby sections - [CFTC Letter No. 08-03 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of Eight Futures Contracts Based on Security Indices Derived from the Dow Jones STOXX 600 Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_03.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-05 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the RDXxt USD-RDX Extended Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_05.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-11 Euronext Paris SAs request for no-action relief in connection with the offer and sale in the United States of its futures contracts based on the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Europe Index and the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Euro Zone Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_11.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-13 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contracts Based on the SLI Swiss Leader Index, the Swiss Market Index Midcap, the Dow Jones Eur...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_13.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-15 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight granted exemptive relief from certain of the Part 4 regulations to the registered CPO of a commodity pool, whose shares the CPO intended to publicly offer and to lis...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_15.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-17 DCIO received a request for guidance from the Joint Audit Committee concerning FCM regulatory reporting requirements for investments in a money market mutual fund. The fund had announced that its net asset value per s...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_17.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-18 The Division of Market Oversight issued a letter granting no-action relief to permit the Brazilian Derivatives Exchange, BM&F Bovespa S.A. – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros (BM&F), to make its electronic tradi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_18.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-19 Thailand Futures Exchange Pcls Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the SET50 Index Futures Contract.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_19.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-21 The Division of Market Oversight issued a no-action letter to BNP Paribas confirming that the Division will not recommend that the Commission initiate enforcement action against BNP Paribas or Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., o...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_21.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-02 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partner of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_02.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-06 The CPO of a commodity pool requested that DCIO agree to accept the Annual Report for the period from January 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008 as the Pool’s final annual report despite the fact that the Pool had not f...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_06.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-07 The CPO of a commodity pool with a de minimus amount of its assets embroiled in a bankruptcy requested relief from the ongoing reporting requirements under Part 4. The CPO filed an Annual Report for the Pool for the 2...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_07.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-11 The CPO of two commodity pools requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_11.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-13 The CPO of commodity pool requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_13.md) --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L16_82. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.