# CFTC Letter No. 14-87: Time-limited no-action relief for Korea Exchange, Inc. with regard to Section 5b(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulations thereunder

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L14_87

## Section

- **Citation:** CFTC Letter No. 14-87
- **Heading:** Time-limited no-action relief for Korea Exchange, Inc. with regard to Section 5b(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulations thereunder
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** CFTC Staff Letters (2008-present) / Time-limited no-action relief for Korea Exchange, Inc. with regard to Section 5b(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulations thereunder.

## Text

Summary: Time-limited no-action relief for Korea Exchange, Inc. with regard to Section 5b(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulations thereunder.

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5430
Facsimile: (202) 418-5547
aradhakrishnan@cftc.gov

a

Ananda Radhakrishnan

Director

Division of Clearing and Risk

CFTC Letter No. 14-87
No-Action
June 26, 2014
Division of Clearing and Risk

Mr. Kyungsoo Choi
Chairman & CEO
Korea Exchange

Re:
No-Action Relief with Regard to Section 5b(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act and
Commission Regulations Thereunder

Dear Mr. Choi:

This letter responds to your letter dated May 29, 2014 (“Letter”) to the Division of
Clearing and Risk (“Division”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(“Commission”). In the Letter, you request that the Division confirm that it will not recommend
that the Commission take enforcement action against Korea Exchange, Inc. (“KRX”) for failure
to register as a derivatives clearing organization (“DCO”) pursuant to Section 5b(a) of the
Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”)1 should KRX engage in certain clearing activities specified
in the Letter.

Specifically, KRX seeks to clear Korean Won-denominated interest rate swaps (“KRW
IRS”), as well as any other swaps later covered by the clearing requirements of the Republic of
Korea’s (“Korea”) Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (the “FSCMA”), for
the proprietary trades of KRX’s clearing members that are U.S. persons
ertain clearing activities specified
in the Letter.

Specifically, KRX seeks to clear Korean Won-denominated interest rate swaps (“KRW
IRS”), as well as any other swaps later covered by the clearing requirements of the Republic of
Korea’s (“Korea”) Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (the “FSCMA”), for
the proprietary trades of KRX’s clearing members that are U.S. persons. KRX requests that this
relief expire on the earlier of May 31, 2015, or any date on which the Commission exempts KRX
from the DCO registration requirement under Section 5b(h) of the CEA.2 KRX represents that it
intends to apply for an exemption from registration as a DCO once the Commission addresses
the process or specific criteria and conditions necessary to obtain exemptive relief.3

1 7 U.S.C. § 7a-1(a).
2 Section 5b(h) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. § 7a-1(h), permits the Commission to exempt a clearing organization from
registration for the clearing of swaps if the Commission determines that the clearing organization is subject to
comparable, comprehensive supervision and regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission or the
appropriate government authorities in the clearing organization’s home country.
3 See Letter at 3 n.4 (“KRX stands ready to promptly apply for an exemption from registration as a DCO as soon as
the CFTC issues guidance on the process or specific criteria and conditions necessary to obtain exemptive relief.”)
ehensive supervision and regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission or the
appropriate government authorities in the clearing organization’s home country.
3 See Letter at 3 n.4 (“KRX stands ready to promptly apply for an exemption from registration as a DCO as soon as
the CFTC issues guidance on the process or specific criteria and conditions necessary to obtain exemptive relief.”)

Mr. Kyungsoo Choi
June 26, 2014
Page 2

Statement of Facts

Based on KRX’s representations to the Division contained in the Letter, the Division
understands the relevant facts to be as follows:

KRX, which operates as both an exchange and a clearinghouse, was established under the
Securities and Futures Exchange Law of Korea, which was later replaced by the FSCMA. KRX
operates three separate clearing businesses, including its Swaps Clearing Business, which was
opened to KRX clearing members on March 3, 2014. KRX’s Swaps Clearing Business currently
offers clearing services only for plain vanilla KRW IRS, and it currently limits its swaps clearing
services exclusively to clearing participants that are not U.S. persons.

The Korean Financial Services Commission (“FSC”) authorizes Korean clearinghouses,
and the FCSMA requires that prior to authorizing a clearinghouse, the FSC must be satisfied that
a clearinghouse has: equity capital satisfying a specified regulatory minimum; a proper and
sound business plan; human resources, data-processing equipment, and other physical facilities
sufficient to protect investors and conduct its clearing business; articles of incorporation and
regulations suitable for its clearing business; a system to prevent certain conflicts of interest; and
shareholders possessing adequate financial capabilities. The FCSMA also requires that
clearinghouses meet these requirements on an ongoing basis to maintain their authorization
hysical facilities
sufficient to protect investors and conduct its clearing business; articles of incorporation and
regulations suitable for its clearing business; a system to prevent certain conflicts of interest; and
shareholders possessing adequate financial capabilities. The FCSMA also requires that
clearinghouses meet these requirements on an ongoing basis to maintain their authorization.

Authorized clearinghouses in Korea are subject to day-to-day supervision and ongoing
examination and oversight by the FSC and the Financial Supervisory Service, which acts under
the oversight of the FSC. The Bank of Korea also shares responsibility for oversight of
clearinghouses in Korea and is responsible for developing some of the regulatory requirements
applicable to clearinghouses. Korean regulatory authorities have incorporated into the Korean
regulatory scheme for clearinghouses the Principles for Financial Market Infrastructure
(“PFMIs”) developed by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems of the Bank for
International Settlements and the Technical Committee of the International Organization of
Securities Commissions. The FSC has confirmed that the standards articulated in the PFMIs are
incorporated through a combination of FSCMA provisions, enforcement decrees, FSC
regulations, and by a requirement that Korean clearinghouses incorporate certain provisions
directly into their rulebook.
Discussion of Request for No-Action Relief and Applicable Legal Requirements

KRX has represented that the KRW IRS that it seeks to clear for proprietary trades of
U.S. clearing members are swaps under the CEA and Commission regulations, and the Division
accepts KRX’s representation without independent analysis.4 Section 5b(a) of the CEA provides

4 The CEA’s statutory definition of “swap” includes interest rate swaps. See Section 1a(47)(A) of the CEA,
7 U.S.C. § 1a(47)(A) (“[T]he term ‘swap’ means any agreement, contract, or transaction –
the CEA and Commission regulations, and the Division
accepts KRX’s representation without independent analysis.4 Section 5b(a) of the CEA provides

4 The CEA’s statutory definition of “swap” includes interest rate swaps. See Section 1a(47)(A) of the CEA,
7 U.S.C. § 1a(47)(A) (“[T]he term ‘swap’ means any agreement, contract, or transaction – . . . (iii) that provides on
an executory basis for the exchange, on a fixed or contingent basis, of 1 or more payments based on the value or
level of 1 or more interest or other rates . . . including any agreement, contract, or transaction commonly known as –
(I) an interest rate swap . . . .”)

Mr. Kyungsoo Choi
June 26, 2014
Page 3

that a DCO may not perform the functions of a DCO with respect to swaps unless it is registered
with the Commission.5

The Division, however, has recently granted no-action relief permitting non-U.S. clearing
organizations to clear swaps for U.S. persons prior to registering with the Commission as a
DCO,6 and KRX’s request is generally consistent with the requests that prompted that relief.
Granting the relief KRX requests pending consideration of its anticipated application for an
exemption pursuant to Section 5b(h) of the CEA is appropriate in order to facilitate the
centralized clearing of KRW IRS and to promote competition and enhance choice for clearing
services. The Division notes, however, that the Commission has not established a regulatory
framework for exempting a clearing organization from registration as a DCO pursuant to Section
5b(h) of the CEA. Accordingly, the Division’s grant of no-action relief herein should not be
interpreted to mean that the Commission will exempt KRX from registration as a DCO
and enhance choice for clearing
services. The Division notes, however, that the Commission has not established a regulatory
framework for exempting a clearing organization from registration as a DCO pursuant to Section
5b(h) of the CEA. Accordingly, the Division’s grant of no-action relief herein should not be
interpreted to mean that the Commission will exempt KRX from registration as a DCO.

With respect to the scope of products covered by the requested relief, KRX seeks relief
that applies to “any swaps covered by the FSCMA Clearing Requirements, including KRW
IRS.”7 It is unclear, however, when or if the FSCMA Clearing Requirements will expand
beyond KRW IRS, and the Division does not have any information regarding the nature of the
products that could potentially fall within any future expansion.8 As a result, the no-action relief
detailed below is limited to the KRW IRS products that are specifically discussed in the Letter.9

5 Section 5b(a) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. § 7a-1(a), states: “Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall be unlawful for
a derivatives clearing organization, directly or indirectly, to make use of the mails or any means or instrumentality
of interstate commerce to perform the functions of a derivatives clearing organization with respect to – . . . (B) a
swap. (2) EXCEPTION. – Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a derivatives clearing organization that is registered with
the Commission.”
6 See CFTC Letter 14-68 (May 7, 2014) (granting no-action relief to OTC Clearing Hong Kong Limited and certain
of its clearing members); CFTC Letter 14-27 (Mar. 20, 2014) (extending previous grant of no-action relief to Eurex
Clearing AG and certain of its clearing members); CFTC Letter 14-07 (Feb. 6, 2014) (granting no-action relief to
ASX Clear (Futures) Pty Limited); CFTC Letter No. 13-73 (Dec
See CFTC Letter 14-68 (May 7, 2014) (granting no-action relief to OTC Clearing Hong Kong Limited and certain
of its clearing members); CFTC Letter 14-27 (Mar. 20, 2014) (extending previous grant of no-action relief to Eurex
Clearing AG and certain of its clearing members); CFTC Letter 14-07 (Feb. 6, 2014) (granting no-action relief to
ASX Clear (Futures) Pty Limited); CFTC Letter No. 13-73 (Dec. 19, 2013) (extending previous grant of no-action
relief to Japan Securities Clearing Corporation and certain of its clearing members); CFTC Letter No. 13-44 (July
11, 2013) (granting no-action relief to Eurex Clearing AG and certain of its clearing members); CFTC Letter No.
13-43 (July 11, 2013) (granting no-action relief to LCH.Clearnet SA and certain of its clearing members); CFTC
Letter No. 12-63 (Dec. 21, 2012) (granting no-action relief to Singapore Exchange Derivatives Clearing Limited and
certain of its clearing members); and CFTC Letter No. 12-56 (Dec. 17, 2012) (granting no-action relief to Japan
Securities Clearing Corporation and certain of its clearing members).
7 Letter at 4.
8 See Letter at 2-3 (“The FSCMA Clearing Requirements may be expanded in the future to cover other types of
swaps, although no definitive plans have yet been announced.”)
9 If the FSCMA Clearing Requirements expand to include additional products while the no-action relief granted
herein is still in effect, KRX may request that the Division amend the relief.
g members).
7 Letter at 4.
8 See Letter at 2-3 (“The FSCMA Clearing Requirements may be expanded in the future to cover other types of
swaps, although no definitive plans have yet been announced.”)
9 If the FSCMA Clearing Requirements expand to include additional products while the no-action relief granted
herein is still in effect, KRX may request that the Division amend the relief.

Mr. Kyungsoo Choi
June 26, 2014
Page 4

Grant of No-Action Relief

Based on the facts presented and KRX’s representations to the Division, the Division will
not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against KRX for failure to register
as a DCO pursuant to the requirements of Section 5b(a) of the CEA, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Product Scope. The relief is limited to clearing of KRW IRS swaps.
2. Participant Scope. The relief applies to KRX’s clearing of proprietary trades10 of U.S.
clearing members.
3. Reporting. If a clearing member clears through KRX a swap (referred to as the “alpha”
swap) that has been reported to a Commission-registered swap data repository (“SDR”)
pursuant to Part 45 of the Commission’s regulations,11 then KRX must report to an SDR,
pursuant to Part 45, data regarding the two swaps resulting from the novation of the alpha
swap that had been submitted to KRX for clearing (referred to as “beta” and “gamma”
swaps.)12
4. Limited Duration. The no-action relief shall expire at the earlier of: (i) December 31,
2014;13 or (ii) the date on which the Commission either registers KRX as a DCO under

10 See 17 C.F.R. § 1.3(y) (definition of “proprietary account”).
11 See Swap Data Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements, 77 Fed. Reg. 2136 (Jan. 13, 2012) (adopting Part
45).
12 Pursuant to Regulation 39.12(b)(6), 17 C.F.R
the earlier of: (i) December 31,
2014;13 or (ii) the date on which the Commission either registers KRX as a DCO under

10 See 17 C.F.R. § 1.3(y) (definition of “proprietary account”).
11 See Swap Data Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements, 77 Fed. Reg. 2136 (Jan. 13, 2012) (adopting Part
45).
12 Pursuant to Regulation 39.12(b)(6), 17 C.F.R. § 39.12(b)(6), during the clearing process, a swap submitted for
clearing to a registered DCO (the alpha swap) is extinguished or terminated, and two new swaps (the beta and
gamma swaps) are created. The registered DCO must then report the beta and gamma swaps to an SDR under Part
45 and associate the unique swap identifier of the alpha swap with the beta and gamma swaps in order for the
Commission to confirm that such alpha swap was cleared. See Statement of the Commission concerning CME Rule
1001 (Mar. 6, 2013) at 6, available at:
http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/statementofthecommission.pdf; see also
Regulation 45.4(a), 17 C.F.R. § 45.4(a) (“[R]eporting counterparties and [DCOs] required to report swap
continuation data must do so in a manner sufficient to ensure that all data in the [SDR] concerning the swap remains
current and accurate, and includes all changes to the primary economic terms of the swap occurring during the
existence of the swap.”); 77 Fed. Reg. at 2153 (“[T]he final rule requires registered entities and reporting
counterparties to report continuation data in a manner sufficient to ensure that the information in the SDR
concerning the swap is current and accurate, and includes all changes to any of the primary economic terms of the
swap.”).
In order to avoid duplicative reporting for such transactions, KRX should have rules that prohibit the Part 45
reporting of the beta and gamma swaps by the original counterparties to the alpha swap
tion data in a manner sufficient to ensure that the information in the SDR
concerning the swap is current and accurate, and includes all changes to any of the primary economic terms of the
swap.”).
In order to avoid duplicative reporting for such transactions, KRX should have rules that prohibit the Part 45
reporting of the beta and gamma swaps by the original counterparties to the alpha swap. These rules should make it
clear to market participants that KRX is reporting the beta and gamma swaps as if it were a registered DCO under
the Part 45 rules.
13 KRX requested that the relief expire on the earlier of May 31, 2015, or any date on which the CFTC exempts
KRX from the DCO registration requirement under Section 5b(h) of the CEA. To maintain consistency with the
relief granted to other similarly situated non-U.S. clearing organizations, the date certain included in this provision is
December 31, 2014, rather than the requested date.

Mr. Kyungsoo Choi
June 26, 2014
Page 5

Section 5b(a) of the CEA or exempts KRX from registration as a DCO under Section
5b(h) of the CEA.
The position taken herein concerns enforcement action only and does not represent a
legal conclusion with respect to the applicability of any provision of the CEA or the
Commission’s regulations. In addition, the Division’s position does not necessarily reflect the
views of the Commission or any other division or office of the Commission. Because this
position is based on the representations contained in the Letter, any different, changed, or
omitted material facts or circumstances may require a different conclusion or render this letter
void. Finally, as with all no-action letters, the Division retains the authority to condition further,
modify, suspend, terminate, or otherwise restrict the terms of the no-action relief provided
herein, in its discretion.

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (202) 418-5188 or
Theodore Polley, Special Counsel, at (312) 596-0551
usion or render this letter
void. Finally, as with all no-action letters, the Division retains the authority to condition further,
modify, suspend, terminate, or otherwise restrict the terms of the no-action relief provided
herein, in its discretion.

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (202) 418-5188 or
Theodore Polley, Special Counsel, at (312) 596-0551.

Sincerely,

Ananda Radhakrishnan

Director

## Nearby sections

- [CFTC Letter No. 08-03 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of Eight Futures Contracts Based on Security Indices Derived from the Dow Jones STOXX 600 Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_03.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-05 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the RDXxt USD-RDX Extended Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_05.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-11 Euronext Paris SAs request for no-action relief in connection with the offer and sale in the United States of its futures contracts based on the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Europe Index and the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Euro Zone Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_11.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-13 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contracts Based on the SLI Swiss Leader Index, the Swiss Market Index Midcap, the Dow Jones Eur...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_13.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-15 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight granted exemptive relief from certain of the Part 4 regulations to the registered CPO of a commodity pool, whose shares the CPO intended to publicly offer and to lis...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_15.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-17 DCIO received a request for guidance from the Joint Audit Committee concerning FCM regulatory reporting requirements for investments in a money market mutual fund. The fund had announced that its net asset value per s...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_17.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-18 The Division of Market Oversight issued a letter granting no-action relief to permit the Brazilian Derivatives Exchange, BM&F Bovespa S.A. – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros (BM&F), to make its electronic tradi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_18.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-19 Thailand Futures Exchange Pcls Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the SET50 Index Futures Contract.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_19.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-21 The Division of Market Oversight issued a no-action letter to BNP Paribas confirming that the Division will not recommend that the Commission initiate enforcement action against BNP Paribas or Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., o...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_21.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-02 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partner of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_02.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-06 The CPO of a commodity pool requested that DCIO agree to accept the Annual Report for the period from January 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008 as the Pool’s final annual report despite the fact that the Pool had not f...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_06.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-07 The CPO of a commodity pool with a de minimus amount of its assets embroiled in a bankruptcy requested relief from the ongoing reporting requirements under Part 4. The CPO filed an Annual Report for the Pool for the 2...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_07.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-11 The CPO of two commodity pools requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_11.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-13 The CPO of commodity pool requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_13.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L14_87. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.