# CFTC Letter No. 14-156: The Division of Clearing and Risk extended the no-action relief granted in CFTC Letter 14-27 to Eurex Clearing and its U.S. clearing members with regard to Sections 5b(a) and 2(h)(1)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act... > Federal · Agency guidance · Superseded URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L14_156 ## Section - **Citation:** CFTC Letter No. 14-156 - **Heading:** The Division of Clearing and Risk extended the no-action relief granted in CFTC Letter 14-27 to Eurex Clearing and its U.S. clearing members with regard to Sections 5b(a) and 2(h)(1)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act... - **Jurisdiction:** Federal - **Kind:** Agency guidance - **Status:** Superseded - **Text as of:** August 14, 2026 - **Source:** Compiled text - **Location:** CFTC Staff Letters (2008-present) / The Division of Clearing and Risk extended the no-action relief granted in CFTC Letter 14-27 to Eurex Clearing and its U.S. clearing members with regard to Sections 5b(a) and 2(h)(1)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act.... ## Text Summary: The Division of Clearing and Risk extended the no-action relief granted in CFTC Letter 14-27 to Eurex Clearing and its U.S. clearing members with regard to Sections 5b(a) and 2(h)(1)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act. The time-limited no-action relief is subject to several conditions. U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 Telephone: (202) 418-5449 Facsimile: (202) 418-5547 pdietz@cftc.gov a Phyllis Dietz Acting Director Division of Clearing and Risk CFTC Letter No. 14-156 No-Action December 23, 2014 Division of Clearing and Risk Mr. Thomas Book, Chief Executive Officer Mr. Oliver Haderup, Executive Director Eurex Clearing AG Mergenthalerallee 61 65760 Eschborn, Germany Re: Extension of Time-Limited No-Action Relief with Regard to Sections 5b(a) and 2(h)(1)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Implementing Regulations Thereunder Dear Mr. Book and Mr. Haderup: This is in response to your letter dated December 15, 2014 (“Letter”), to the Division of Clearing and Risk (“Division”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) requesting a further extension of the no-action relief that the Division granted to Eurex Clearing AG (“Eurex Clearing”) in CFTC Letter 14-27 and that expires on December 31, 2014 (the “No-Action Relief”).1 In CFTC Letter 14-27, the Division stated it would not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against (1) Eurex Clearing for failure to register as a derivatives clearing organization (“DCO”) pursuant to the requirements of Section 5b(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”),2 or x Clearing”) in CFTC Letter 14-27 and that expires on December 31, 2014 (the “No-Action Relief”).1 In CFTC Letter 14-27, the Division stated it would not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against (1) Eurex Clearing for failure to register as a derivatives clearing organization (“DCO”) pursuant to the requirements of Section 5b(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”),2 or (2) clearing members of Eurex Clearing that are U.S. persons (each, a “U.S. Clearing Member”) for failure to clear certain interest rate swaps (“IRS”) or certain credit default swaps (“CDS”) on a broad-based index of reference entities (“Index CDS”) through a 1 CFTC Letter No. 14-27 (March 10, 2014) and its attachment, available at http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/letter/14-27.pdf and http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/eurexattachmentnal031014.pdf. CFTC Letter No. 14-27 extended the no-action relief originally granted in CFTC Letter No. 13-44 (July 11, 2013). 2 7 U.S.C. § 7a-1(a). Mr. Thomas Book Mr. Oliver Haderup December 23, 2014 Page 2 registered or exempt DCO pursuant to the requirements of Section 2(h)(1)(A) of the CEA and the implementing regulations thereunder as applicable.3 You have requested that the No- Action Relief be extended until the earlier of September 30, 2015, or the date upon which Eurex Clearing becomes registered as a DCO with respect to its IRS clearing business.4 Eurex Clearing filed its initial application for DCO registration on May 17, 2011 and amended applications on September 14, 2012 and September 21, 2012. Subsequently, Eurex Clearing has submitted additional materials, which further support its application, most recently on October 20, 2014 e upon which Eurex Clearing becomes registered as a DCO with respect to its IRS clearing business.4 Eurex Clearing filed its initial application for DCO registration on May 17, 2011 and amended applications on September 14, 2012 and September 21, 2012. Subsequently, Eurex Clearing has submitted additional materials, which further support its application, most recently on October 20, 2014. The review period for consideration of the application has been extended to September 30, 2015.5 Eurex Clearing requests the further extension of the No-Action Relief in order to maintain the status quo during the pendency of its application for registration. Eurex Clearing further states that such extension of the No-Action Relief is an appropriate means of promoting competition and enhancing choice in clearing services and is in the public interest. In view of the foregoing, the Division has decided to extend the No-Action Relief, subject to the conditions described below, until the earlier of the date on which Eurex Clearing becomes registered as a DCO with respect to its IRS clearing business or September 30, 2015. Extension of Grant of No-Action Relief Based on the facts presented and the representations you have made, the Division will not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against (i) Eurex Clearing for failure to register as a DCO pursuant to the requirements of Section 5b(a) of the CEA, or (ii) U.S. Clearing Members for failure to clear IRS through a registered or exempt DCO, pursuant to the requirements of Section 2(h)(1)(A) of the CEA and the implementing regulations thereunder as applicable, subject to the following conditions: ion take enforcement action against (i) Eurex Clearing for failure to register as a DCO pursuant to the requirements of Section 5b(a) of the CEA, or (ii) U.S. Clearing Members for failure to clear IRS through a registered or exempt DCO, pursuant to the requirements of Section 2(h)(1)(A) of the CEA and the implementing regulations thereunder as applicable, subject to the following conditions: (1) Product Scope. This relief is limited to IRS currently accepted for clearing by Eurex Clearing for U.S. Clearing Members and identified in the attachment to this letter; 3 7 U.S.C. § 2(h)(1)(A); 17 C.F.R. pt 50. 4 Eurex Clearing is not requesting an extension of the No-Action Relief with respect to its Index CDS business. A list of IRS products offered for clearing by Eurex Clearing for U.S. Clearing Members is in the attachment to this letter. Moreover, Eurex Clearing is no longer pursuing registration as a DCO for the clearing of Index CDS. 5 By separate letter dated December 15, 2014, Eurex Clearing requested that the review period for its DCO application be extended until September 30, 2015. Mr. Thomas Book Mr. Oliver Haderup December 23, 2014 Page 3 (2) Participant Scope. The relief applies to Eurex Clearing and to its prospective U.S. Clearing Members in connection with their proprietary6 IRS clearing businesses (Eurex Clearing will not accept, and no Eurex clearing member will offer for clearing through Eurex Clearing, IRS on behalf of a U.S. customer7); (3) Limited Duration. The no-action relief shall expire at the earlier of: (i) September 30, 2015, or (ii) the date upon which Eurex Clearing becomes registered as a DCO with respect to its IRS clearing business;8 and IRS clearing businesses (Eurex Clearing will not accept, and no Eurex clearing member will offer for clearing through Eurex Clearing, IRS on behalf of a U.S. customer7); (3) Limited Duration. The no-action relief shall expire at the earlier of: (i) September 30, 2015, or (ii) the date upon which Eurex Clearing becomes registered as a DCO with respect to its IRS clearing business;8 and (4) Reporting. If a U.S. Clearing Member clears through Eurex Clearing a swap (referred to as the “alpha swap”) that has been reported to a Commission- registered swap data repository (“SDR”) pursuant to Part 45 of the Commission’s regulations,9 then Eurex Clearing must report to an SDR, pursuant to Part 45, data regarding the two swaps resulting from the novation of the alpha swap that had been submitted to Eurex Clearing for clearing (referred to as “beta” and “gamma” swaps).10 6 The term “proprietary account” is defined in § 1.3(y) of the Commission’s regulations, 17 C.F.R. § 1.3(y). The relief granted herein to U.S. Clearing Members includes transactions of a parent or affiliate of a U.S. Clearing Member. 7 The scope of the relief provided herein does not extend to customer clearing by U.S. Clearing Members or U.S. customer clearing by any clearing member of Eurex Clearing. The term “customer” is defined in § 1.3(k) of the Commission’s regulations, 17 C.F.R. § 1.3(k). 8 Should the Commission deny Eurex Clearing’s application for DCO registration, the Division will provide Eurex Clearing and its U.S. Clearing Members with guidance and, as appropriate, no-action relief to facilitate the orderly disposition of open positions. 9 See Swap Data Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements, 77 Fed. Reg. 2136 (Jan. 13, 2012) (adopting Part 45) s, 17 C.F.R. § 1.3(k). 8 Should the Commission deny Eurex Clearing’s application for DCO registration, the Division will provide Eurex Clearing and its U.S. Clearing Members with guidance and, as appropriate, no-action relief to facilitate the orderly disposition of open positions. 9 See Swap Data Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements, 77 Fed. Reg. 2136 (Jan. 13, 2012) (adopting Part 45). 10 Pursuant to Commission Regulation 39.12(b)(6), during the clearing process, a swap submitted for clearing to a DCO (the alpha swap) is extinguished or terminated, and two new swaps (the beta and gamma swaps) are created. The DCO must then report the beta and gamma swaps to an SDR under Part 45 and associate the unique swap identifier (USI) of the alpha swap with the beta and gamma swap in order for the Commission to confirm that such alpha swap was cleared. See Statement of the Commission concerning CME Rule 1001 (March 6, 2013), page 6, available at: http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/statementofthecommission.pdf. See also Commission Regulation 45.4(a) (“[R]eporting counterparties and [DCOs] required to report swap continuation data must do so in a manner sufficient to ensure that all data in the [SDR] concerning the swap remains current and accurate, and includes all changes to the primary economic terms of the swap occurring during the existence of the swap.”); 77 Fed. Reg. at 2153 (“[T]he final rule requires registered entities and reporting counterparties to report continuation data in a manner sufficient to ensure that the information in the SDR concerning the swap is current and accurate, and includes all changes to any of the primary economic terms of the swap.”); see also Commission Regulation 49.11 (Confirmation of data accuracy). the swap.”); 77 Fed. Reg. at 2153 (“[T]he final rule requires registered entities and reporting counterparties to report continuation data in a manner sufficient to ensure that the information in the SDR concerning the swap is current and accurate, and includes all changes to any of the primary economic terms of the swap.”); see also Commission Regulation 49.11 (Confirmation of data accuracy). Mr. Thomas Book Mr. Oliver Haderup December 23, 2014 Page 4 The position taken herein concerns enforcement action only and does not represent a legal conclusion with respect to the applicability of any provision of the CEA or the Commission’s regulations. In addition, the Division’s position does not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission or any other division or office of the Commission. Because this position is based upon the representations contained in the Letter and in Eurex Clearing’s DCO application, it should be noted that any different, changed, or omitted material facts or circumstances may require a different conclusion or render this letter void. Finally, as with all no-action letters, the Division retains the authority to condition further, modify, suspend, terminate, or otherwise restrict the terms of the no-action relief provided herein, in its discretion. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Eileen Donovan at (202) 418-5096, or Alicia Lewis, Special Counsel, at (202) 418-5862. Sincerely, Phyllis Dietz Acting Director Attachment In order to avoid duplicative reporting for such transactions, Eurex Clearing should have rules that prohibit the Part 45 reporting of the beta and gamma swaps by the original counterparties to the alpha swap achment In order to avoid duplicative reporting for such transactions, Eurex Clearing should have rules that prohibit the Part 45 reporting of the beta and gamma swaps by the original counterparties to the alpha swap. These rules should make it clear to market participants that Eurex Clearing is reporting the beta and gamma swaps as if it were a registered DCO under the Part 45 rules. -··-·--·· ·-----------------------------------!"", ---n J . ATTACHMENT. A- Prc~ucls Offered. for Clearing by Eurex Clearfn~ AG for u.s. Person.s Interest Rate Swap•: Proc(1,1ats: Slog!~ ·curtartcy .ll)~rest r~te swaps ("IRS") Forwa~ i'~t~t'ag~~meiits ("FRA") · Ovl!lrillght !rid.e~. liW8P ('Jdfst?, excep~ In Japanese yen Sl~gla c~,.~cy basis swaps ~rp coupon swaps ~PO\ and forward ~tarts Compoundl!'lg ~ fl~t and. ~ght. (f9r IRS and basis swaps) Ll!l~ar !!'lte;pqlatl~n. of stub .Periods Front and back atub!J (for IRS arid OIS) Neg~tfva lnte,_l iatei · v~~ltp ~oUop~l- ainortlz!ng ~nd rol!er C1Qa&ter (for IRS and basis SWSP\1) Var(abla l"ifex spreil~ on·f{oatlng rat~ that can differ peifod per pe~od (IRS and basis swaps) FI!Ca.~ coupon rates that can differ period per period (IRS and baslil swaps) II'J!M -lnternatlonar Moneta,Y Mark.&ts - roll .dates . Cummales: · Euro,·I).S. dollar, B~llsh pounds, Swiss franc, and Japanese yen TeffiiB: Swaps en~r~ Into under ISDA® 2000/2!106 and Garman Master Agreements- standard swaps and {9~ ratJ agreement wllh standard day count arid buslne8s day eonventlons, fee legs, ccinstant noUonills, front ot back &tubs and floating rate Indexes fOr eaCh currency • . . IRs EtiR, GBP, USD Up lo50 rt;m Plain wnara (lJluldJlluaQ Boabllancr (lloalli!oaQ CHF,JPY Uptoaovuurs EUR. OBI', USD, CIIF Uplo30 )'8iJa Plain vanilla (~aQ \ ., 4 \ \ I I I I ## Nearby sections - [CFTC Letter No. 08-03 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of Eight Futures Contracts Based on Security Indices Derived from the Dow Jones STOXX 600 Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_03.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-05 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the RDXxt USD-RDX Extended Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_05.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-11 Euronext Paris SAs request for no-action relief in connection with the offer and sale in the United States of its futures contracts based on the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Europe Index and the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Euro Zone Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_11.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-13 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contracts Based on the SLI Swiss Leader Index, the Swiss Market Index Midcap, the Dow Jones Eur...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_13.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-15 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight granted exemptive relief from certain of the Part 4 regulations to the registered CPO of a commodity pool, whose shares the CPO intended to publicly offer and to lis...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_15.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-17 DCIO received a request for guidance from the Joint Audit Committee concerning FCM regulatory reporting requirements for investments in a money market mutual fund. The fund had announced that its net asset value per s...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_17.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-18 The Division of Market Oversight issued a letter granting no-action relief to permit the Brazilian Derivatives Exchange, BM&F Bovespa S.A. – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros (BM&F), to make its electronic tradi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_18.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-19 Thailand Futures Exchange Pcls Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the SET50 Index Futures Contract.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_19.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-21 The Division of Market Oversight issued a no-action letter to BNP Paribas confirming that the Division will not recommend that the Commission initiate enforcement action against BNP Paribas or Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., o...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_21.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-02 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partner of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_02.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-06 The CPO of a commodity pool requested that DCIO agree to accept the Annual Report for the period from January 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008 as the Pool’s final annual report despite the fact that the Pool had not f...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_06.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-07 The CPO of a commodity pool with a de minimus amount of its assets embroiled in a bankruptcy requested relief from the ongoing reporting requirements under Part 4. The CPO filed an Annual Report for the Pool for the 2...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_07.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-11 The CPO of two commodity pools requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_11.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-13 The CPO of commodity pool requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_13.md) --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L14_156. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.