# CFTC Letter No. 14-07: The Division of Clearing and Risk issued a letter stating that it will not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against ASX Clear (Futures) Pty Limited for failure to register as a derivatives clearin..

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L14_07

## Section

- **Citation:** CFTC Letter No. 14-07
- **Heading:** The Division of Clearing and Risk issued a letter stating that it will not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against ASX Clear (Futures) Pty Limited for failure to register as a derivatives clearin..
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** CFTC Staff Letters (2008-present) / The Division of Clearing and Risk issued a letter stating that it will not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against ASX Clear (Futures) Pty Limited for failure to register as a derivatives clearin...

## Text

Summary: The Division of Clearing and Risk issued a letter stating that it will not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against ASX Clear (Futures) Pty Limited for failure to register as a derivatives clearing organization pursuant to Section 5b(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act in connection with the clearing of certain interest rate swaps.

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5430
Facsimile: (202) 418-5547
aradhakrishnan@cftc.gov

Ananda Radhakrishnan

Director

Division of Clearing and Risk

CFTC Letter No. 14-07
No-Action
February 6, 2014
Division of Clearing and Risk

Ms. Amanda J. Harkness
Group General Counsel & Company Secretary
ASX Group
Exchange Centre
20 Bridge Street
Sydney NSW 2000
PO Box H224
Australia Square NSW 1215, Australia

Dear Ms. Harkness:

This is in response to your letter dated September 18, 2013 (“Letter”), to the Division of
Clearing and Risk (“Division”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(“Commission”). In the Letter, you request that the Division confirm that it will not recommend
that the Commission take enforcement action against ASX Clear (Futures) Pty Limited
(“ASXCLF”) for failure to register as a derivatives clearing organization (“DCO”) pursuant to
Section 5b(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”).1

Under this requested relief, ASXCLF would be permitted to clear Australian and New
Zealand dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (“A$ IRS” and “NZ$ IRS,” respectively, and
together, “A&NZ$ IRS”) for the proprietary trades of qualified U.S. clearing participants and
their parent entities and affiliates
organization (“DCO”) pursuant to
Section 5b(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”).1

Under this requested relief, ASXCLF would be permitted to clear Australian and New
Zealand dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (“A$ IRS” and “NZ$ IRS,” respectively, and
together, “A&NZ$ IRS”) for the proprietary trades of qualified U.S. clearing participants and
their parent entities and affiliates. You request that such relief be effective until the earlier of
December 31, 2014 or the date upon which the Commission, acting pursuant to its authority
under Section 5b(h) of the CEA, exempts ASXCLF from the DCO registration requirement of
the CEA.2 You further represent that ASXCLF is ready to apply for an exemption from

1 7 U.S.C. § 7a-1(a).
2 Section 5b(h) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. § 7a-1(h), permits the Commission to exempt a DCO from registration for the
clearing of swaps to the extent that the Commission determines that such DCO is subject to comparable,
comprehensive supervision by the Securities and Exchange Commission or the appropriate government authorities

Ms. Amanda J. Harkness
February 6, 2014
Page 2

registration as a DCO once the Commission addresses the process or specific criteria and
conditions necessary to obtain exemptive relief.

Statement of Facts

Based upon the representations made by ASXCLF to the Division in the Letter as well as
representations made in meetings and telephone conversations, we understand the relevant facts
to be as follows:

ASXCLF is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the ASX Clearing Corporation, which is part
of ASX Group. ASXCLF operates as a futures clearinghouse and as of September 2013,
provides dealer-only clearing services in A$ IRS.3

Currently, ASXCLF limits its swap clearing services to clearing participants that are not
U.S. persons. However, the Australian branches of two U.S
cts
to be as follows:

ASXCLF is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the ASX Clearing Corporation, which is part
of ASX Group. ASXCLF operates as a futures clearinghouse and as of September 2013,
provides dealer-only clearing services in A$ IRS.3

Currently, ASXCLF limits its swap clearing services to clearing participants that are not
U.S. persons. However, the Australian branches of two U.S. swap dealers have expressed a
strong interest in becoming direct participants of ASXCLF for the purpose of clearing
proprietary A$ IRS transactions.

In addition to providing clearing services for proprietary A$ IRS transactions, ASXCLF
would also like to provide clearing services to U.S. persons for interest rate swaps in other non-
U.S. currencies, such as NZ$ IRS.

With respect to the regulation and supervision of ASXCLF, all clearing organizations in
Australia must be licensed under the Australian Corporations Act of 2001, which requires the
Treasury Minister to make a finding that the clearing organization has adequate operating rules
and procedures to ensure that systemic risk is reduced and that the clearing organization operates
in a fair and effective manner. In making this assessment, the Treasury Minister considers
advice from two independent government agencies, the Australian Securities and Investment
Commission (“ASIC”), which ensures that a clearing organization’s operations are carried out in
a fair and effective way and that other conditions on a clearing organization’s license are
satisfied, and the Reserve Bank of Australia (“RBA”), which is responsible for ensuring the
financial system stability of the clearing organization.

Clearing organizations in Australia must also comply with the Australian Financial
Stability Standards (“FSS”), which set forth requirements relating to the reduction of systemic
risk. On March 29, 2013, new FSS became effective
license are
satisfied, and the Reserve Bank of Australia (“RBA”), which is responsible for ensuring the
financial system stability of the clearing organization.

Clearing organizations in Australia must also comply with the Australian Financial
Stability Standards (“FSS”), which set forth requirements relating to the reduction of systemic
risk. On March 29, 2013, new FSS became effective. The new FSS align with the Principles for
Financial Market Infrastructures (“PFMIs”) developed by the Bank for International Settlements’
Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems (“CPSS”) and the Technical Committee of the

in the home country of the DCO. At present, no foreign clearing organization has been granted an exemption from
registration for the clearing of swaps.

3 ASXCLF has represented that it is developing client clearing services, which are scheduled for commercial launch
in the second quarter of 2014. See Letter at 1 n.2.

Ms. Amanda J. Harkness
February 6, 2014
Page 3

International Organization of Securities Commissions (“IOSCO”). ASIC and the RBA have
both confirmed that they apply domestic regulations to ASXCLF that are consistent with the
PFMIs.4 In addition, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (“APRA”) has confirmed
that it considers ASXCLF to meet the criteria of a “Qualifying CCP,” which means that APRA
affirms that ASXCLF is prudentially supervised in a jurisdiction where the relevant regulator has
established and publicly indicated that it applies, on an ongoing basis, domestic rules and
regulations that are consistent with the PFMIs.5 In August 2013, CPSS-IOSCO noted in the
“Implementation Monitoring of PFMIs – Level 1 Assessment Report” that Australia’s
implementation of CCP-related PFMIs is complete.6

Discussion of Request for No-Action Relief and Applicable Legal Requirements

The Divi
d and publicly indicated that it applies, on an ongoing basis, domestic rules and
regulations that are consistent with the PFMIs.5 In August 2013, CPSS-IOSCO noted in the
“Implementation Monitoring of PFMIs – Level 1 Assessment Report” that Australia’s
implementation of CCP-related PFMIs is complete.6

Discussion of Request for No-Action Relief and Applicable Legal Requirements

The Division accepts, without independent analysis, ASXCLF’s representation that the
A&NZ$ IRS contracts subject to its request are swaps under the CEA and Commission
regulations. The Division also accepts, without further inquiry, that the Australian branches of
two U.S. swap dealers have expressed a strong interest in becoming direct participants of
ASXCLF for the purpose of clearing proprietary A$ IRS transactions, and that these branches
would provide liquidity to the A$ IRS market.

Section 1a(47)(A)(iii)(I) of the CEA includes interest rate swaps within the definition of
“swap” and Regulation 1.3(iii) includes interest rate swaps as one of the major swap categories.7
Section 5b(a) of the CEA provides that a clearing organization may not perform the functions of
a DCO with respect to swaps unless it is registered with the Commission.8

ASXCLF’s request for relief is consistent with recent requests for no-action letters
permitting non-U.S. clearing organizations to clear swaps for U.S. Persons prior to becoming

4 See Letter at 2 n.4.

5 See Letter at 2 n.5.
6 Available at http://www.bis.org/publ/cpss111.pdf .
7 Section 1a(47)(A) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C
ommission.8

ASXCLF’s request for relief is consistent with recent requests for no-action letters
permitting non-U.S. clearing organizations to clear swaps for U.S. Persons prior to becoming

4 See Letter at 2 n.4.

5 See Letter at 2 n.5.
6 Available at http://www.bis.org/publ/cpss111.pdf .
7 Section 1a(47)(A) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. § 1a(47)(a), states: “Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term
‘swap’ means any agreement, contract, or transaction-- … (iii) that provides on an executory basis for the exchange,
on a fixed or contingent basis, of 1 or more payments based on the value or level of 1 or more interest or other rates
… including any agreement, contract, or transaction commonly known as— (I) an interest rate swap ….” Regulation
1.3(iii), 17 C.F.R. §1.3(iii), states: “… the terms major swap category, category of swaps and any similar terms
mean any of the following category of swaps listed below…. (1) Rate swaps. Any swap which is primarily based on
one or more reference rates, including but not limited to any swap of payments determined by fixed and floating
interest rates ….”
8 Section 5b(a) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. § 7a-1(a), states: “Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall be unlawful for
a derivatives clearing organization, directly or indirectly, to make use of the mails or any means or instrumentality
of interstate commerce to perform the functions of a derivatives clearing organization with respect to … (B) a swap.
y fixed and floating
interest rates ….”
8 Section 5b(a) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. § 7a-1(a), states: “Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall be unlawful for
a derivatives clearing organization, directly or indirectly, to make use of the mails or any means or instrumentality
of interstate commerce to perform the functions of a derivatives clearing organization with respect to … (B) a swap.
(2) EXCEPTION. – Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a derivatives clearing organization that is registered with the
Commission.”

Ms. Amanda J. Harkness
February 6, 2014
Page 4

registered with the Commission as a DCO.9 Granting the relief requested by ASXCLF during
the pendency of its application for an exemption pursuant to Section 5b(h) of the CEA, is
appropriate in order to facilitate the centralized clearing of the A&NZ$ IRS contracts and to
promote competition and enhance choice in clearing services for such contracts. The Division
notes, however, that the Commission has not established a regulatory framework for exempting a
clearing organization from registration as a DCO pursuant to Section 5b(h) of the CEA.
Accordingly, the Division’s granting of no-action relief herein should not be interpreted to mean
that the Commission will exempt ASXCLF from registration as a DCO.

Grant of No-Action Relief

Based on the facts presented and the representations you have made, the Division will not
recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against ASXCLF for failure to register
as a DCO pursuant to the requirements of Section 5b(a) of the CEA, subject to the following
conditions:

(1) Product Scope. This relief is limited to A&NZ$ IRS contracts accepted for clearing by
ASXCLF;
Based on the facts presented and the representations you have made, the Division will not
recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against ASXCLF for failure to register
as a DCO pursuant to the requirements of Section 5b(a) of the CEA, subject to the following
conditions:

(1) Product Scope. This relief is limited to A&NZ$ IRS contracts accepted for clearing by
ASXCLF;

(2) Participant Scope. The relief applies to ASXCLF’s clearing of the proprietary trades of
ASXCLF’s U.S. clearing participants, including transactions of a parent or affiliate of an
ASXCLF U.S. clearing participant (meaning, ASXCLF shall not accept, and no ASXCLF
member shall offer for clearing through ASXCLF, swaps on behalf of a U.S. customer);

(3) Reporting. ASXCLF shall comply with the reporting obligations applicable to DCOs
under the Commission’s Part 45 regulations; and

(4) Limited Duration. The no-action relief shall expire at the earlier of: (i) December 31,
2014 or (ii) the date upon which the Commission either registers ASXCLF as a DCO
under Section 5b(a) of the CEA or exempts ASXCLF from registration as a DCO under
Section 5b(h) of the CEA.

The position taken herein concerns enforcement action only and does not represent a
legal conclusion with respect to the applicability of any provision of the CEA or the
Commission’s regulations. In addition, the Division’s position does not necessarily reflect the
views of the Commission or any other division or office of the Commission. Because this
position is based upon the representations contained in the Letter, it should be noted that any

9 See CFTC No-Action Letter No. 13-73 (Dec. 19, 2013) (extending previous grant of no-action relief to Japan
Securities Clearing Corporation and certain of its clearing members); CFTC No-Action Letter No. 13-43 (July 11,
2013) (granting no-action relief to LCH.Clearnet SA and certain of its clearing members); CFTC No-Action Letter
No
that any

9 See CFTC No-Action Letter No. 13-73 (Dec. 19, 2013) (extending previous grant of no-action relief to Japan
Securities Clearing Corporation and certain of its clearing members); CFTC No-Action Letter No. 13-43 (July 11,
2013) (granting no-action relief to LCH.Clearnet SA and certain of its clearing members); CFTC No-Action Letter
No. 13-33 (July 11, 2013) (granting no-action relief to Eurex Clearing AG and certain of its clearing members);
CFTC No-Action Letter No. 12-63 (Dec. 21, 2012) (granting no-action relief to Singapore Exchange Derivatives
Clearing Limited and certain of its clearing members); and CFTC No-Action Letter No. 12-56 (Dec. 17, 2012)
(granting no action relief to Japan Securities Clearing Corporation and certain of its clearing members).

Ms. Amanda J. Harkness
February 6, 2014
Page 5

different, changed, or omitted material facts or circumstances may require a different conclusion
or render this letter void. Finally, as with all no-action letters, the Division retains the authority
to condition further, modify, suspend, terminate, or otherwise restrict the terms of the no-action
relief provided herein, in its discretion.

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (202) 418-5188, or
Andrea Musalem, Special Counsel, at (202) 418-5167.

Sincerely,

Ananda Radhakrishnan
Director

cc: Andrea Musalem

## Nearby sections

- [CFTC Letter No. 08-03 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of Eight Futures Contracts Based on Security Indices Derived from the Dow Jones STOXX 600 Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_03.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-05 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the RDXxt USD-RDX Extended Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_05.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-11 Euronext Paris SAs request for no-action relief in connection with the offer and sale in the United States of its futures contracts based on the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Europe Index and the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Euro Zone Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_11.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-13 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contracts Based on the SLI Swiss Leader Index, the Swiss Market Index Midcap, the Dow Jones Eur...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_13.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-15 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight granted exemptive relief from certain of the Part 4 regulations to the registered CPO of a commodity pool, whose shares the CPO intended to publicly offer and to lis...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_15.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-17 DCIO received a request for guidance from the Joint Audit Committee concerning FCM regulatory reporting requirements for investments in a money market mutual fund. The fund had announced that its net asset value per s...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_17.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-18 The Division of Market Oversight issued a letter granting no-action relief to permit the Brazilian Derivatives Exchange, BM&F Bovespa S.A. – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros (BM&F), to make its electronic tradi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_18.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-19 Thailand Futures Exchange Pcls Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the SET50 Index Futures Contract.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_19.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-21 The Division of Market Oversight issued a no-action letter to BNP Paribas confirming that the Division will not recommend that the Commission initiate enforcement action against BNP Paribas or Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., o...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_21.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-02 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partner of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_02.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-06 The CPO of a commodity pool requested that DCIO agree to accept the Annual Report for the period from January 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008 as the Pool’s final annual report despite the fact that the Pool had not f...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_06.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-07 The CPO of a commodity pool with a de minimus amount of its assets embroiled in a bankruptcy requested relief from the ongoing reporting requirements under Part 4. The CPO filed an Annual Report for the Pool for the 2...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_07.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-11 The CPO of two commodity pools requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_11.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-13 The CPO of commodity pool requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_13.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L14_07. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.