# CFTC Letter No. 13-43: No-Action Relief for LCH.Clearnet with Regard to Sections 5b(a) and 2(h)(1)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Implementing Regulations Thereunder > Federal · Agency guidance · In force URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L13_43 ## Section - **Citation:** CFTC Letter No. 13-43 - **Heading:** No-Action Relief for LCH.Clearnet with Regard to Sections 5b(a) and 2(h)(1)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Implementing Regulations Thereunder - **Jurisdiction:** Federal - **Kind:** Agency guidance - **Status:** In force - **Text as of:** August 14, 2026 - **Source:** Compiled text - **Location:** CFTC Staff Letters (2008-present) / No-Action Relief for LCH.Clearnet with Regard to Sections 5b(a) and 2(h)(1)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Implementing Regulations Thereunder. ## Text Summary: No-Action Relief for LCH.Clearnet with Regard to Sections 5b(a) and 2(h)(1)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Implementing Regulations Thereunder. U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 Telephone: (202) 418-5430 Facsimile: (202) 418-5547 aradhakrishnan@cftc.gov a Ananda Radhakrishnan Director Division of Clearing and Risk CFTC Letter No. 13-43 No-Action July 11, 2013 Division of Clearing and Risk Mr. Christophe Hémon LCH.Clearnet SA CEO 18 rue du Quatre Septembre Paris, France 750002 Re: No-Action Relief with Regard to Sections 5b(a) and 2(h)(1)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Implementing Regulations Thereunder Dear Mr. Hémon: This is in response to your letter dated July 2, 2013 (“Letter”), to the Division of Clearing and Risk (“Division”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”). In the Letter, you request that the Division confirm that it will not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against (1) Banque Centrale de Compensation, doing business as LCH.Clearnet SA (“LCH.C SA”) for failure to register as a derivatives clearing organization (“DCO”) pursuant to Section 5b(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”),1 or (2) clearing members of LCH.C SA that are U.S. persons (each, a “U.S. CDS Clearing Member”) for failure to clear certain credit default swaps (“CDS”) on a broad-based index of reference entities (“Index CDS”) through a registered DCO pursuant to Section 2(h)(1)(A) of the CEA and the implementing regulations thereunder as applicable.2 Under this proposed relief, LCH.C SA would be permitted to clear Index CDS transactions based on certain iTraxx Europe indices. In addition, U.S. CDS Clearing Members would be permitted to clear proprietary positions in such Index CDS through a DCO that is not registered with the Commission ant to Section 2(h)(1)(A) of the CEA and the implementing regulations thereunder as applicable.2 Under this proposed relief, LCH.C SA would be permitted to clear Index CDS transactions based on certain iTraxx Europe indices. In addition, U.S. CDS Clearing Members would be permitted to clear proprietary positions in such Index CDS through a DCO that is not registered with the Commission. You have requested that such relief be effective until the earlier of December 31, 2013, or the date upon which the Commission 1 7 U.S.C. 7a-1(a). 2 7 U.S.C. 2(h)(1)(A); 17 C.F.R. Part 50. Mr. Christophe Hémon July 11, 2013 Page 2 approves LCH.C SA’s pending application for registration as a DCO with respect to its Index CDS clearing business.3 Statement of Facts Based upon the representations made by LCH.C SA to the Division, including the representations made in the Letter and in LCH.C SA’s DCO application, we understand the relevant facts to be as follows: LCH.C SA is a French subsidiary of LCH.Clearnet Group Limited, a holding company incorporated in the United Kingdom, and operates as a clearing house subject to French law. Its principal office is in Paris, and it operates branches in Amsterdam and Brussels and a representative office in Portugal. Under French law, LCH.C SA is regulated both as a credit institution by the Prudential Control Authority (Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel) (“ACP”) and as a clearing house by the Financial Markets Authority (Autorité des Marchés Financiers) (“AMF”). The ACP and AMF also regulate LCH.C SA as an investment service provider. In addition, LCH.C SA is subject to regulation as a securities settlement system operator by the Banque de France and the AMF it institution by the Prudential Control Authority (Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel) (“ACP”) and as a clearing house by the Financial Markets Authority (Autorité des Marchés Financiers) (“AMF”). The ACP and AMF also regulate LCH.C SA as an investment service provider. In addition, LCH.C SA is subject to regulation as a securities settlement system operator by the Banque de France and the AMF. LCH.C SA launched its clearing services for Index CDS on March 29, 2010, and it has proposed to expand these services to additional members and customers.4 In connection with this proposed expansion of its business, LCH.C SA filed an initial application for DCO registration on April 25, 2012 and amended its application on November 2, 2012 and May 16, 2013. Index CDS contracts currently accepted for clearing by LCH.C SA include Index CDS on the following iTraxx Europe indices:  the benchmark iTraxx Europe Main index;  the iTraxx Europe HiVol index; and  the iTraxx Europe Crossover Index. LCH.C SA accepts for clearing 3-, 5-, 7-, and 10-year maturity CDS on the iTraxx indices listed above, from series 5 and above. The Commission recently adopted regulations to establish a clearing requirement under Section 2(h)(1)(A) of the CEA with respect to 3 By letter dated June 21, 2013, LCH.C SA requested that the review period for its DCO application be extended until December 31, 2013. 4 LCH.C SA has proposed to extend its Index CDS clearing business to U.S. proprietary and U.S. customer clearing. The scope of the relief provided herein does not extend to customer clearing by U.S. CDS Clearing Members or U.S. customer clearing by any LCH.C SA clearing member. The term “customer” is defined in § 1.3(k) of the Commission’s regulations, 17 C.F.R. § 1.3(k). See Adaptation of Regulations to Incorporate Swaps, 77 Fed. Reg. 66,288, 66,316 (Nov. 2, 2012). rietary and U.S. customer clearing. The scope of the relief provided herein does not extend to customer clearing by U.S. CDS Clearing Members or U.S. customer clearing by any LCH.C SA clearing member. The term “customer” is defined in § 1.3(k) of the Commission’s regulations, 17 C.F.R. § 1.3(k). See Adaptation of Regulations to Incorporate Swaps, 77 Fed. Reg. 66,288, 66,316 (Nov. 2, 2012). Mr. Christophe Hémon July 11, 2013 Page 3 certain classes of interest rate swaps and CDS.5 Certain Index CDS products accepted for clearing by LCH.C SA are among those covered by the clearing determination. Discussion of Request for No-Action Relief and Applicable Legal Requirements The Division accepts, without independent analysis, LCH.C SA’s representation that the Index CDS contracts subject to its request are swaps under the CEA and Commission regulations. It also accepts, without further inquiry, that certain of LCH.C SA’s prospective clearing members may be U.S. persons. On October 12, 2012, the Commission’s regulatory definition of the term “swap,” which includes Index CDS, became effective.6 Section 5b(a) of the CEA provides that a derivatives clearing organization may not perform the functions of a DCO with respect to swaps unless it is registered with the Commission.7 Section 2(h)(1)(A) of the CEA states that swaps that are required to be cleared must be submitted to a registered DCO or a DCO that is exempt from registration.8 LCH.C SA’s request for relief is consistent with recent requests for Division no-action letters permitting similarly-situated non-U.S. clearing organizations to clear swaps for U.S. persons prior to becoming registered with the Commission as a DCO.9 Granting the relief requested by LCH.C SA during the pendency of its DCO registration application is appropriate in order to promote competition and enhance choice in clearing services for Index CDS, particularly iTraxx products ion letters permitting similarly-situated non-U.S. clearing organizations to clear swaps for U.S. persons prior to becoming registered with the Commission as a DCO.9 Granting the relief requested by LCH.C SA during the pendency of its DCO registration application is appropriate in order to promote competition and enhance choice in clearing services for Index CDS, particularly iTraxx products. 5 See Clearing Requirement Determination Under Section 2(h) of the CEA, 77 Fed. Reg. 74,284 (Dec.13, 2012) (adopting Part 50 of the Commission’s regulations). 6 See Further Definition of “Swap,” “Security-Based Swap,” and “Security-Based Swap Agreement”; Mixed Swaps; Security-Based Swap Agreement Recordkeeping, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,207 (Aug. 13, 2012). 7 Section 5b(a) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 7a-1(a), states: “Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall be unlawful for a derivatives clearing organization, directly or indirectly, to make use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce to perform the functions of a derivatives clearing organization with respect to . . . (B) a swap. (2) EXCEPTION. – Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a derivatives clearing organization that is registered with the Commission. ” 8 Section 5b(h) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 7a-1(h), permits the Commission to exempt a DCO from registration for the clearing of swaps to the extent that the Commission determines that such DCO is subject to comparable, comprehensive supervision by the Securities and Exchange Commission or the appropriate government authorities in the home country of the DCO. At the present time, no DCO has sought or been granted an exemption from registration for the clearing of swaps. 9 See CFTC No-Action Letter No. 12-56 (Dec. 17, 2012) (granting no action relief to Japan Securities Clearing Corporation and certain of its clearing members); and CFTC No-Action Letter No. 12-63 (Dec ion or the appropriate government authorities in the home country of the DCO. At the present time, no DCO has sought or been granted an exemption from registration for the clearing of swaps. 9 See CFTC No-Action Letter No. 12-56 (Dec. 17, 2012) (granting no action relief to Japan Securities Clearing Corporation and certain of its clearing members); and CFTC No-Action Letter No. 12-63 (Dec. 21, 2012) (granting no-action relief to Singapore Exchange Derivatives Clearing Limited and certain of its clearing members). Mr. Christophe Hémon July 11, 2013 Page 4 Grant of No-Action Relief Based on the facts presented and the representations you have made, the Division will not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against (i) LCH.C SA for failure to register as a DCO pursuant to the requirements of Section 5b(a) of the CEA, or (ii) U.S. CDS Clearing Members for failure to clear Index CDS through a registered or exempt DCO pursuant to the requirements of Section 2(h)(1)(A) of the CEA and the implementing regulations thereunder as applicable, subject to the following conditions: (1) Product Scope. This relief is limited to Index CDS currently accepted for clearing by LCH.C SA; (2) Participant Scope. The relief applies to LCH.C SA and to its prospective U.S. CDS Clearing Members in connection with their proprietary10 Index CDS clearing business (LCH.C SA will not accept, and no LCH.C SA clearing member will offer for clearing through LCH.C SA, Index CDS on behalf of a U.S. customer); and ief is limited to Index CDS currently accepted for clearing by LCH.C SA; (2) Participant Scope. The relief applies to LCH.C SA and to its prospective U.S. CDS Clearing Members in connection with their proprietary10 Index CDS clearing business (LCH.C SA will not accept, and no LCH.C SA clearing member will offer for clearing through LCH.C SA, Index CDS on behalf of a U.S. customer); and (3) Limited Duration. The no-action relief shall expire at the earlier of: (i) December 31, 2013 or (ii) the date upon which LCH.C SA becomes registered as a DCO with respect to its Index CDS clearing business.11 The position taken herein concerns enforcement action only and does not represent a legal conclusion with respect to the applicability of any provision of the CEA or the Commission’s regulations. In addition, the Division’s position does not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission or any other division or office of the Commission. Because this position is based upon the representations contained in the Letter and in LCH.C SA’s DCO application, it should be noted that any different, changed, or omitted material facts or circumstances may require a different conclusion or render this letter void. Finally, as with all no-action letters, the Division retains the authority to condition further, modify, suspend, terminate, or otherwise restrict the terms of the no-action relief provided herein, in its discretion. 10 The term “proprietary account” is defined in § 1.3(y) of the Commission’s regulations, 17 C.F.R. § 1.3(y). The relief granted herein to U.S. CDS Clearing Members includes transactions of a parent or affiliate of a U.S. CDS Clearing Member. 11 Should the Commission deny LCH.C SA’s application for DCO registration, the Division will provide LCH.C SA and its U.S. CDS Clearing Members with guidance and, as appropriate, no-action relief to facilitate the orderly disposition of open positions. .3(y). The relief granted herein to U.S. CDS Clearing Members includes transactions of a parent or affiliate of a U.S. CDS Clearing Member. 11 Should the Commission deny LCH.C SA’s application for DCO registration, the Division will provide LCH.C SA and its U.S. CDS Clearing Members with guidance and, as appropriate, no-action relief to facilitate the orderly disposition of open positions. Mr. Christophe Hémon July 11, 2013 Page 5 Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (202) 418- 5188, or Heidi Rauh, Special Counsel, at (312) 596-0644. Sincerely, Ananda Radhakrishnan Director ## Nearby sections - [CFTC Letter No. 08-03 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of Eight Futures Contracts Based on Security Indices Derived from the Dow Jones STOXX 600 Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_03.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-05 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the RDXxt USD-RDX Extended Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_05.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-11 Euronext Paris SAs request for no-action relief in connection with the offer and sale in the United States of its futures contracts based on the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Europe Index and the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Euro Zone Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_11.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-13 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contracts Based on the SLI Swiss Leader Index, the Swiss Market Index Midcap, the Dow Jones Eur...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_13.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-15 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight granted exemptive relief from certain of the Part 4 regulations to the registered CPO of a commodity pool, whose shares the CPO intended to publicly offer and to lis...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_15.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-17 DCIO received a request for guidance from the Joint Audit Committee concerning FCM regulatory reporting requirements for investments in a money market mutual fund. The fund had announced that its net asset value per s...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_17.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-18 The Division of Market Oversight issued a letter granting no-action relief to permit the Brazilian Derivatives Exchange, BM&F Bovespa S.A. – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros (BM&F), to make its electronic tradi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_18.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-19 Thailand Futures Exchange Pcls Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the SET50 Index Futures Contract.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_19.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-21 The Division of Market Oversight issued a no-action letter to BNP Paribas confirming that the Division will not recommend that the Commission initiate enforcement action against BNP Paribas or Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., o...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_21.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-02 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partner of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_02.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-06 The CPO of a commodity pool requested that DCIO agree to accept the Annual Report for the period from January 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008 as the Pool’s final annual report despite the fact that the Pool had not f...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_06.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-07 The CPO of a commodity pool with a de minimus amount of its assets embroiled in a bankruptcy requested relief from the ongoing reporting requirements under Part 4. The CPO filed an Annual Report for the Pool for the 2...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_07.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-11 The CPO of two commodity pools requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_11.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-13 The CPO of commodity pool requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_13.md) --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L13_43. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.