# CFTC Letter No. 13-01: No-Action Relief from Required Clearing for Swaps Resulting from Multilateral Portfolio Compression Exercises

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L13_01

## Section

- **Citation:** CFTC Letter No. 13-01
- **Heading:** No-Action Relief from Required Clearing for Swaps Resulting from Multilateral Portfolio Compression Exercises
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** CFTC Staff Letters (2008-present) / No-Action Relief from Required Clearing for Swaps Resulting from Multilateral Portfolio Compression Exercises

## Text

Summary: No-Action Relief from Required Clearing for Swaps Resulting from Multilateral Portfolio Compression Exercises

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5430
Facsimile: (202) 418-5547
aradhakrishnan@cftc.gov

a

Ananda Radhakrishnan

Director

Division of Clearing and Risk

CFTC Letter No. 13-01
No-Action
March 18, 2013

Division of Clearing and Risk

Re: No-Action Relief from Required Clearing for Swaps Resulting from Multilateral
Portfolio Compression Exercises

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter is in response to a request dated February 19, 2013, from TriOptima, an entity
that offers multilateral portfolio compression services,1 to the Division of Clearing and Risk
(Division) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission), in which TriOptima
requested relief on behalf of swap market participants that participate in multilateral portfolio
compression exercises in the form of confirmation from Division staff that the clearing
requirement under section 2(h)(1)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and part 50 of
Commission regulations does not apply to (1) swaps that are amended in order to reduce notional
value as part of a multilateral portfolio compression exercise and (2) new swaps that are entered
into to replace the original swaps as a result of a multilateral portfolio compression exercise in
order to reduce notional exposures or aggregate outstanding gross notional exposure
CEA) and part 50 of
Commission regulations does not apply to (1) swaps that are amended in order to reduce notional
value as part of a multilateral portfolio compression exercise and (2) new swaps that are entered
into to replace the original swaps as a result of a multilateral portfolio compression exercise in
order to reduce notional exposures or aggregate outstanding gross notional exposure. The
request focuses on swaps that were executed prior to the date on which the counterparties must
begin complying with the clearing requirement (and therefore, not required to be cleared),2 but

1 Although the relief contained herein was requested by a particular service provider, such relief is available to
all participants in any multilateral portfolio compression exercise, as defined in Commission regulation 23.500(h),
subject to the conditions specified herein.

2 The Commission set forth a specific compliance schedule for market participants to bring their swaps into
compliance with the clearing requirement. See Clearing Requirement Determination Under Section 2(h) of the
CEA, 77 FR 74284, 74319-20 (Dec. 13, 2012) [hereinafter “Clearing Requirement Determination”]. Swap dealers
(SDs), major swap participants (MSPs), and private funds active in the swaps market (active funds) are required to
comply beginning on March 11, 2013, for swaps they enter into on or after that date. All other financial entities are
required to clear swaps beginning on June 10, 2013, for swaps entered into on or after that date, except for accounts
managed by third-party investment managers, as well as ERISA pension plans, which have until September 9, 2013,
to begin clearing swaps entered into on or after that date
inning on March 11, 2013, for swaps they enter into on or after that date. All other financial entities are
required to clear swaps beginning on June 10, 2013, for swaps entered into on or after that date, except for accounts
managed by third-party investment managers, as well as ERISA pension plans, which have until September 9, 2013,
to begin clearing swaps entered into on or after that date. With regard to the credit default swap indices on European
corporate names, iTraxx, the Clearing Requirement Determination provided that, if no derivatives clearing
organization (DCO) offers iTraxx for client clearing by February 11, 2013, the Commission will delay compliance
for those swaps until 60 days after an eligible DCO offers iTraxx indices for client clearing. The Commission
recently announced that iTraxx clearing will commence on April 26, 2013, for SDs, MSPs, and active funds.
Financial entities other than accounts managed by third-party investment managers and ERISA plans are required to

2
are subsequently amended or replaced in connection with a multilateral portfolio compression
exercise.

As discussed below, the proposed relief would permit market participants to continue to
use multilateral portfolio compression exercises for reducing the risk of uncleared swaps that
were entered into prior to an applicable compliance date as set forth by the Commission (and
therefore, not required to be cleared), provided that certain conditions are met.

Factual Background and Request for Relief

Multilateral portfolio compression allows swap market participants to net down the size
and/or number of outstanding swaps among them, lower the aggregate gross notional value of
outstanding swaps, and decrease the number of outstanding swaps or the aggregate notional
value of such swaps, thereby reducing operational risk and, in some instances, reducing
counterparty credit risk
or Relief

Multilateral portfolio compression allows swap market participants to net down the size
and/or number of outstanding swaps among them, lower the aggregate gross notional value of
outstanding swaps, and decrease the number of outstanding swaps or the aggregate notional
value of such swaps, thereby reducing operational risk and, in some instances, reducing
counterparty credit risk. For purposes of this letter, the term “multilateral portfolio compression
exercise” has the meaning given to the term in Commission regulation § 23.500(h).3
Commission regulation § 23.500(h) defines the term to mean “an exercise in which multiple
swap counterparties wholly terminate or change the notional value of some or all of the swaps
submitted by the counterparties for inclusion in the portfolio compression exercise and,
depending on the methodology employed, replace the terminated swaps with other swaps whose
combined notional value (or some other measure of risk) is less than the combined notional value
(or some other measure of risk) of the terminated swaps in the compression exercise.”

In a multilateral portfolio compression exercise for uncleared swaps, the compression
service provider analyzes the uncleared swap portfolios of multiple swap market participants and
publishes the optimal solution for the compression cycle based on one of two methods. Under
the first method, the outstanding notional value of the original swap between two counterparties
is reduced by amending the original swap. This “amended swap” method is the predominant
method used in compressions of uncleared interest rate swaps. Under the second method, one or
more existing swaps are terminated and replaced by new swaps that reflect a netting down of
existing notional exposure between the counterparties.4 This “replacement swap” method is
predominantly used in compression exercises for uncleared credit default swaps, but it can also
be used for interest rate swap compression exercises
uncleared interest rate swaps. Under the second method, one or
more existing swaps are terminated and replaced by new swaps that reflect a netting down of
existing notional exposure between the counterparties.4 This “replacement swap” method is
predominantly used in compression exercises for uncleared credit default swaps, but it can also
be used for interest rate swap compression exercises. Counterparties have the option of electing
either of the two methods of compression.

Under the rules of the compression exercise, for either method of compression —
amended swap or replacement swap — the counterparties to the original swap do not change. In

begin clearing iTraxx index swaps entered into on or after July 25, 2013, and all other entities are required to begin
clearing iTraxx index swaps on October 23, 2013, for swaps entered into on or after that date.

3 See Confirmation, Portfolio Reconciliation, Portfolio Compression, and Swap Trading Relationship
Documentation Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants, 77 FR 55904, 55960 (Sept. 11, 2012).

4 In the vast majority of compression exercises there is a reduction in the notional exposures due to netting.
However, in some exercises there is merely an aggregation of outstanding gross exposures arising from multiple
swaps into one replacement swap with no net reduction in notional exposures.
equirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants, 77 FR 55904, 55960 (Sept. 11, 2012).

4 In the vast majority of compression exercises there is a reduction in the notional exposures due to netting.
However, in some exercises there is merely an aggregation of outstanding gross exposures arising from multiple
swaps into one replacement swap with no net reduction in notional exposures.

3
addition, the reference entity and the maximum maturity do not change. Finally, the overall
market risk of the portfolios of the market participants in the compression exercise does not
change.

TriOptima requests that Division staff clarify that amended and replacement swaps,
where the original swap was not required to be cleared at the time of execution but that is
subsequently amended or replaced in connection with a multilateral portfolio compression
exercise after the relevant clearing requirement compliance date (e.g., after March 11, 2013 for a
swap between two SDs), are not required to be cleared solely by virtue of being amended or
replaced through a multilateral portfolio compression exercise.

TriOptima represents that requiring amended swaps or replacement swaps resulting from
a compression exercise to be cleared would alter the credit risk profile for those participating in
the compression exercise because counterparties to the amended or replacement swaps would be
required to face a derivatives clearing organization (DCO) instead of the original bilateral
counterparty. Further, TriOptima represents that because participants would not know in
advance which swaps may be subject to an amendment or replacement, or the notional amount to
be amended or replaced, market participants likely would reconsider their participation in these
industry-wide risk reduction exercises
ce a derivatives clearing organization (DCO) instead of the original bilateral
counterparty. Further, TriOptima represents that because participants would not know in
advance which swaps may be subject to an amendment or replacement, or the notional amount to
be amended or replaced, market participants likely would reconsider their participation in these
industry-wide risk reduction exercises. As a result, TriOptima represents that changing the
required clearing status of the swaps would discourage participation in compression exercises
and inhibit the risk reduction benefits that such exercises provide.

Applicable Regulatory Requirements and Analysis

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010,5 in relevant
part, amended section 2(h)(1)(A) of the CEA, which states that “it shall be unlawful for any
person to engage in a swap unless that person submits such swap for clearing to a [DCO] that is
registered under [the CEA] or a [DCO] that is exempt from registration under [the CEA] if the
swap is required to be cleared.”6

On December 13, 2012, the Commission published its first clearing requirement
determination. The determination requires market participants to clear swaps meeting the
specifications of two classes of credit default swaps based on North American and European
corporate entities and four classes of interest rate swaps.7 Commission regulation 50.5(b)
provides that swaps entered into before the relevant compliance date for a particular swap are not
subject to the clearing requirement.8 As described above, the Commission set forth a series of

5 Pub. L. No. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).

6 7 U.S.C. § 2(h)(1)(A).

7 See Clearing Requirement Determination, 77 FR at 74336-37 (establishing Commission regulation 50.4,
which sets forth the classes of swaps that are required to be cleared).

8 Id. at 74337.
requirement.8 As described above, the Commission set forth a series of

5 Pub. L. No. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).

6 7 U.S.C. § 2(h)(1)(A).

7 See Clearing Requirement Determination, 77 FR at 74336-37 (establishing Commission regulation 50.4,
which sets forth the classes of swaps that are required to be cleared).

8 Id. at 74337.

4
compliance dates to phase in compliance with the clearing requirement. Swaps entered into
before those compliance dates are not required to be cleared.

In the final rulemaking, the Commission clarified that the clearing requirement applies to
all new swaps, as well as changes in the ownership of a swap, including assignment, novation,
exchange, transfer, or conveyance.9

For purposes of the analysis in this letter, Division staff will assume that the amended or
replacement swaps discussed herein are subject to the clearing requirement under section 2(h) of
the CEA and Commission regulations. In other words, staff is assuming that all swaps subject to
this letter fall within a class of swaps with the specifications set forth in Commission regulation
50.4(a) or (b).

In order to promote the benefits of compression for uncleared swaps, the Division has
determined that it will not recommend enforcement action for failure of market participants to
submit to a DCO for clearing amended swaps or replacement swaps that are generated as part of
a multilateral portfolio compression exercise and are subject to required clearing under
Commission regulation 50.4(a) or (b), provided that certain conditions are met, as described
below.

Division No-Action Position

Based on the foregoing, the Division believes that granting relief is warranted
ubmit to a DCO for clearing amended swaps or replacement swaps that are generated as part of
a multilateral portfolio compression exercise and are subject to required clearing under
Commission regulation 50.4(a) or (b), provided that certain conditions are met, as described
below.

Division No-Action Position

Based on the foregoing, the Division believes that granting relief is warranted.
Accordingly, the Division will not recommend that the Commission take an enforcement action
against any person for failure to comply with the requirement under section 2(h)(1)(A) of the
CEA and part 50 of Commission regulations to clear an amended swap or a replacement swap
that is generated as part of a multilateral portfolio compression exercise, provided that the
following five conditions are met:

1. The “multilateral portfolio compression exercise” generating the amended and
replacement swaps must meet the definition set forth in Commission regulation 23.500(h)
and must involve more than two market participants.

2. No original swap submitted by market participants as part of the multilateral portfolio
compression exercise shall include any swap that has been cleared by a DCO.

3. No original swap submitted by market participants as part of the multilateral portfolio
compression exercise shall include any swap that is required to be cleared under
2(h)(1)(A) of the CEA and part 50 of Commission regulations because it was executed on
or after an applicable compliance date.

4. Each amended swap(s) or replacement swap(s) generated by the multilateral portfolio
compression exercise must:

9 Id. at 74316.
o
compression exercise shall include any swap that is required to be cleared under
2(h)(1)(A) of the CEA and part 50 of Commission regulations because it was executed on
or after an applicable compliance date.

4. Each amended swap(s) or replacement swap(s) generated by the multilateral portfolio
compression exercise must:

9 Id. at 74316.

5

a. be generated in accordance with a multilateral portfolio compression service
provider’s established rules and parameters for multilateral portfolio compression
exercises;

b. be entered into between the same counterparties as the original swap(s) that is
amended or terminated;

c. with the exception of reducing the notional amount, have the same material terms
as the original swap(s), as defined in part 45 of Commission regulations,10
including the reference entity, the maximum maturity of the swap, and the
average weighted maturity of the swap; and

d. be entered into for the sole purpose of reducing operational or counterparty credit
risk.

5. Once the original swaps have been selected and submitted by market participants as part
of the multilateral portfolio compression exercise, the multilateral portfolio compression
methodology does not permit participants to specify which swaps may be amended or
replaced.

This letter, and the positions taken herein, represent the view of this Division only, and
do not necessarily represent the position or view of the Commission or of any other office or
division of the Commission. The relief issued by this letter does not excuse persons relying on it
from compliance with any other applicable requirements contained in the CEA or in the
Commission regulations issued thereunder.11 It does not create or confer any rights for or
obligations on any person or persons subject to compliance with the CEA that bind the
Commission or any of its other offices or divisions
mission. The relief issued by this letter does not excuse persons relying on it
from compliance with any other applicable requirements contained in the CEA or in the
Commission regulations issued thereunder.11 It does not create or confer any rights for or
obligations on any person or persons subject to compliance with the CEA that bind the
Commission or any of its other offices or divisions.

Further, this letter, and the relief contained herein, is based upon the representations made
to the Division. Any different, changed, or omitted material facts or circumstances might render
this no-action relief void.

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Sarah Josephson,
Deputy Director, at (202) 418-5684, or Brian O’Keefe, Associate Director, at (202) 418-5658.

Sincerely,

Ananda Radhakrishnan

10 For purposes of this letter, “material terms” means all terms of a swap required to be reported in accordance
with part 45 of Commission regulations.

11 For example, the relief provided herein does not excuse persons from any applicable swap reporting
requirements or any requirement under section 2(h)(8) of the CEA.

## Nearby sections

- [CFTC Letter No. 08-03 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of Eight Futures Contracts Based on Security Indices Derived from the Dow Jones STOXX 600 Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_03.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-05 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the RDXxt USD-RDX Extended Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_05.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-11 Euronext Paris SAs request for no-action relief in connection with the offer and sale in the United States of its futures contracts based on the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Europe Index and the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Euro Zone Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_11.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-13 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contracts Based on the SLI Swiss Leader Index, the Swiss Market Index Midcap, the Dow Jones Eur...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_13.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-15 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight granted exemptive relief from certain of the Part 4 regulations to the registered CPO of a commodity pool, whose shares the CPO intended to publicly offer and to lis...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_15.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-17 DCIO received a request for guidance from the Joint Audit Committee concerning FCM regulatory reporting requirements for investments in a money market mutual fund. The fund had announced that its net asset value per s...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_17.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-18 The Division of Market Oversight issued a letter granting no-action relief to permit the Brazilian Derivatives Exchange, BM&F Bovespa S.A. – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros (BM&F), to make its electronic tradi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_18.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-19 Thailand Futures Exchange Pcls Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the SET50 Index Futures Contract.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_19.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-21 The Division of Market Oversight issued a no-action letter to BNP Paribas confirming that the Division will not recommend that the Commission initiate enforcement action against BNP Paribas or Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., o...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_21.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-02 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partner of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_02.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-06 The CPO of a commodity pool requested that DCIO agree to accept the Annual Report for the period from January 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008 as the Pool’s final annual report despite the fact that the Pool had not f...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_06.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-07 The CPO of a commodity pool with a de minimus amount of its assets embroiled in a bankruptcy requested relief from the ongoing reporting requirements under Part 4. The CPO filed an Annual Report for the Pool for the 2...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_07.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-11 The CPO of two commodity pools requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_11.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-13 The CPO of commodity pool requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_13.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L13_01. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.