# CFTC Letter No. 12-51: Clarification of Division of Market Oversight No-Action Letter 12-04 (July 17, 2012), and Extension of No-Action Relief for Non-Clearing Member Swap Dealers from Large Swap Trader Reporting Requirements of Section 20...

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L12_51

## Section

- **Citation:** CFTC Letter No. 12-51
- **Heading:** Clarification of Division of Market Oversight No-Action Letter 12-04 (July 17, 2012), and Extension of No-Action Relief for Non-Clearing Member Swap Dealers from Large Swap Trader Reporting Requirements of Section 20...
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** CFTC Staff Letters (2008-present) / Clarification of Division of Market Oversight No-Action Letter 12-04 (July 17, 2012), and Extension of No-Action Relief for Non-Clearing Member Swap Dealers from Large Swap Trader Reporting Requirements of Section 20....

## Text

Summary: Clarification of Division of Market Oversight No-Action Letter 12-04 (July 17, 2012), and Extension of No-Action Relief for Non-Clearing Member Swap Dealers from Large Swap Trader Reporting Requirements of Section 20.4 of the Commission’s Regulations.

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5260
Division of
Market Oversight

CFTC Letter No. 12-51
No-Action
December 14, 2012
Division of Market Oversight

Paul J. Pantano, Jr.
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
700 Sixth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001

Clarification of Division of Market Oversight No-Action Letter 12-04 (July 17, 2012), and
Extension of No-Action Relief for Non-Clearing Member Swap Dealers from Large Swap
Trader Reporting Requirements of Section 20.4 of the Commission’s Regulations

Dear Mr. Pantano:

By letter dated December 6, 2012, to the Division of Market Oversight (“Division”) of the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”), and pursuant to Section 140.99 of
the Commission’s regulations, you request on behalf of your client, the Futures Industry
Association (“FIA”), clarification of the timeline, as contemplated pursuant to a no-action letter
issued by the Division on July 17, 2012 (the “No-Action Letter”),1 within which swap dealers
that are not clearing members (“non-clearing member swap dealers”) must come into compliance
with the large swap trader reporting requirements of Part 20 of the Commission’s regulations.
You request this clarification in light of Commission staff guidance issued subsequent to the
issuance of the No-Action Letter,2 regarding Section 1.3(ggg)(4) of the Commission’s
regulations (the “de minimis exception”).3

The Division is issuing this letter to clarify the compliance timeline contemplated by the No-
Action Letter, and to extend the reporting relief provided to non-clearing member swap dealers
in the No-Action Letter
Commission staff guidance issued subsequent to the
issuance of the No-Action Letter,2 regarding Section 1.3(ggg)(4) of the Commission’s
regulations (the “de minimis exception”).3

The Division is issuing this letter to clarify the compliance timeline contemplated by the No-
Action Letter, and to extend the reporting relief provided to non-clearing member swap dealers
in the No-Action Letter. The extended no-action relief is provided to non-clearing member swap
dealers regardless of whether they are members of FIA.

1 “Staff No-Action Relief: Temporary Relief for Non-Clearing Member Swap Dealers from the Requirements of
§ 20.4 of the Commission’s Regulations Regarding Large Swaps Trader Reporting for Physical Commodities,”
Division No-Action Letter 12-04 (July 17, 2012).
2 “CFTC Staff Responds to Questions on Timing of Swap Dealer Registration Rules,” Commission Press Release
6348-12 (September 10, 2012), available at http://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/pr6348-12.
3 77 Fed. Reg. 30596, 30744-45 (May 23, 2012).

2
BACKGROUND

The No-Action Letter

On July 22, 2011, the Commission published large trader reporting rules for physical commodity
swaps and swaptions.4 The reporting rules are codified in Part 20 of the Commission’s
regulations and became effective on September 20, 2011. Section 20.3 of the rules requires daily
reports from clearing organizations. Section 20.4 of the rules requires daily reports from clearing
members and swap dealers. As of July 2, 2012, clearing organizations and clearing members
were required to be in full compliance with Part 20.5

Section 20.10(b) provides that non-clearing member swap dealers are required to comply with
Part 20 upon the effective date of final regulations further defining the term swap dealer
Section 20.4 of the rules requires daily reports from clearing
members and swap dealers. As of July 2, 2012, clearing organizations and clearing members
were required to be in full compliance with Part 20.5

Section 20.10(b) provides that non-clearing member swap dealers are required to comply with
Part 20 upon the effective date of final regulations further defining the term swap dealer. These
final regulations were adopted by the Commission with an effective date of July 23, 2012.6
Market participants raised concerns that this compliance date would require entities to begin
reporting under Part 20 before they were required to register as swap dealers, since, as July 23,
2012 approached, regulations impacting the timeline for swap dealer registration were still in the
process of being finalized.7 Market participants submitted that modifying the compliance date
for Part 20 reporting by non-clearing member swap dealers would enable entities first to confirm
their regulatory status as swap dealers, before working to comply with the Part 20 reporting
requirements applicable to non-clearing member swap dealers.

On July 17, 2012, the Division issued the No-Action Letter, which provided non-clearing
member swap dealers with relief from the reporting requirements of Part 20 until 60 days after
the “swap dealer registration application date”. The No-Action Letter provided non-clearing

4 76 Fed. Reg. 43851 (July 22, 2011).
5 On September 16, 2011, the Division issued a letter under Section 20.10(c) to relieve clearing organizations and
clearing members as a class from the reporting requirements of Sections 20.3 and 20.4 until November 21, 2011 for
cleared swaps, and January 20, 2012 for uncleared swaps. On November 18, 2011, the Division issued a second
letter under Section 20.10(c) to establish a conditional safe harbor for less than fully compliant reporting under
Sections 20.3 and 20.4 until March 20, 2012
anizations and
clearing members as a class from the reporting requirements of Sections 20.3 and 20.4 until November 21, 2011 for
cleared swaps, and January 20, 2012 for uncleared swaps. On November 18, 2011, the Division issued a second
letter under Section 20.10(c) to establish a conditional safe harbor for less than fully compliant reporting under
Sections 20.3 and 20.4 until March 20, 2012. On March 20, 2012, the Division issued conditional no-action relief
for less than fully compliant reporting under Sections 20.3 and 20.4 until July 2, 2012. In each case, relief was
conditioned on the submission of month-end open interest reports to the Division during the relief period. Both the
safe harbor and the no-action relief for less than fully compliant reporting were also conditioned on the making of a
good faith attempt to comply with the requirements of Part 20 (with direction from the Division as to what would
demonstrate good faith), and the submission of an e-mail to the Division describing how submitted reports varied
from fully compliant reports, the arrangements being made to reach full compliance, and the anticipated date of full
compliance. On July 2, 2012, the Division issued conditional no-action relief to clearing members, until July 27,
2012, for less than fully compliant reporting under Section 20.4 of positions based on ownership. Relief was
conditioned on the submission to the Commission, by July 30, 2012, of fully compliant ownership reports dating
back to July 2, 2012.
6 77 Fed. Reg. 30596 (May 23, 2012).
7 See, e.g. the Commission’s regulations further defining the term swap, which were adopted by the Commission on
August 12, 2012, with an effective date of October 12, 2012. 77 Fed. Reg. 48208 (August 13, 2012).
ef was
conditioned on the submission to the Commission, by July 30, 2012, of fully compliant ownership reports dating
back to July 2, 2012.
6 77 Fed. Reg. 30596 (May 23, 2012).
7 See, e.g. the Commission’s regulations further defining the term swap, which were adopted by the Commission on
August 12, 2012, with an effective date of October 12, 2012. 77 Fed. Reg. 48208 (August 13, 2012).

3
member swap dealers satisfying the conditions of Section 20.10(e) (“Section 20.10(e) swap
dealers”)8 with an additional six calendar months of reporting relief.

The relief periods established by the No-Action Letter were to be calculated with reference to the
“swap dealer registration application date”. The No-Action Letter defined the “swap dealer
registration application date” as “the date by which each person who is a swap dealer must apply
to be registered as a swap dealer,” pursuant to Section 3.10(a)(1)(v)(C)(2) of the Commission’s
regulations.9 Pursuant to Section 3.10(a)(1)(v)(C)(2) of the Commission’s regulations, each
person who is a swap dealer on the effective date of final regulations further defining the term
swap must apply to be registered as a swap dealer by that date.10

The No-Action Letter thus contemplated that the “swap dealer registration application date,”
from which the reporting relief periods provided to non-clearing member swap dealers would be
calculated, would be the effective date of final regulations further defining the term swap
te of final regulations further defining the term
swap must apply to be registered as a swap dealer by that date.10

The No-Action Letter thus contemplated that the “swap dealer registration application date,”
from which the reporting relief periods provided to non-clearing member swap dealers would be
calculated, would be the effective date of final regulations further defining the term swap. These
final regulations were adopted by the Commission with an effective date of October 12, 2012.11

The De Minimis Exception

On September 10, 2012, Commission staff issued guidance that clarified the effect of the de
minimis exception on the determination of swap dealer status.12 Pursuant to the de minimis
exception, an entity that is not registered as a swap dealer will not be deemed to be a swap dealer
until its swap dealing activities have exceeded, in the aggregate, one of two prescribed gross
notional amount thresholds (the “notional thresholds”).13 Once an entity’s swap dealing

8 Section 20.10(e) provides the Commission with discretion to extend the Section 20.10(b) compliance date “by an
additional six calendar months based on resource limitations or lack of experience in reporting to the Commission
for a swap dealer that is not an affiliate of a bank holding company and:

(1) Is not registered with the Commission as a futures commission merchant and is not an affiliate of a futures
commission merchant;
(2) Is not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a broker or dealer and is not an affiliate
of a broker or dealer; and
f experience in reporting to the Commission
for a swap dealer that is not an affiliate of a bank holding company and:

(1) Is not registered with the Commission as a futures commission merchant and is not an affiliate of a futures
commission merchant;
(2) Is not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a broker or dealer and is not an affiliate
of a broker or dealer; and
(3) Is not supervised by any Federal prudential regulator.”

While the criteria for relying on the additional six calendar months of reporting relief provided by the No-Action
Letter reflected the criteria set forth in Section 20.10(e), the relief provided by the No-Action Letter was provided
pursuant to a no-action position taken by the Division, rather than pursuant to an exercise of the discretionary
authority granted to the Commission in Section 20.10(e).
9 See supra note 1 at footnote 2.
10 77 Fed. Reg. 2613, 2626 (January 19, 2012).
11 See supra note 7.
12 See supra note 2.
13 As of October 12, 2012, the notional thresholds are: (1) $8 billion (which is a phase-in level that will subsequently
be adjusted in accordance with Section 1.3(ggg)(4) of the Commission’s regulations); and (2) $25 million with
regard to swaps in respect of which the counterparty is a “special entity” as defined in Section 4s(h)(2)(C) of the
Commodity Exchange Act and Section 23.401(c) of the Commission’s regulations. These thresholds consider all
swap positions connected with the swap dealing activities of the entity, or any other entity controlling, controlled by
or under common control with such entity. See supra note 3. With regard to the “special entity” notional threshold,
l entity” as defined in Section 4s(h)(2)(C) of the
Commodity Exchange Act and Section 23.401(c) of the Commission’s regulations. These thresholds consider all
swap positions connected with the swap dealing activities of the entity, or any other entity controlling, controlled by
or under common control with such entity. See supra note 3. With regard to the “special entity” notional threshold,

4
activities exceed either of the notional thresholds, the entity will be deemed to be a swap dealer
on the earlier of: (i) the date on which the entity submits a complete application for registration
as a swap dealer, or (ii) the date that is two months after the end of the month in which the
notional threshold is exceeded, on which date the entity will be required, pursuant to Section
23.21(a) of the Commission’s regulations, to apply to be registered as a swap dealer.14 The date
described in clause (ii) is therefore referred to herein as the “swap dealer registration deadline”.

For the first year after the regulatory framework for swaps and swap dealers comes into effect,
the swap positions that will be relevant in determining whether an entity’s swap dealing activities
have exceeded one of the notional thresholds will be the swap positions entered into by the entity
– and by any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the entity – after
October 12, 2012.15 Thus, the earliest date on which an entity could have exceeded one of the
notional thresholds was October 13, 2012. Such an entity will, at the latest, be deemed to be a
swap dealer, and will be required to apply to be registered as such, on December 31, 2012 – the
entity’s swap dealer registration deadline – although the entity could elect to apply for
registration, and thereby become a swap dealer, at an earlier date
which an entity could have exceeded one of the
notional thresholds was October 13, 2012. Such an entity will, at the latest, be deemed to be a
swap dealer, and will be required to apply to be registered as such, on December 31, 2012 – the
entity’s swap dealer registration deadline – although the entity could elect to apply for
registration, and thereby become a swap dealer, at an earlier date.

CLARIFICATION AND NO-ACTION RELIEF

The Commission staff guidance regarding the de minimis exception clarified that the deadline by
which any particular entity is required to apply for registration as a swap dealer is tied to when
that entity’s swap dealing activities exceed one of the notional thresholds. The Commission staff
guidance also clarified that the earliest deadline by which any entity will be required to apply for
registration as a swap dealer will be December 31, 2012.

In light of the Commission staff guidance regarding the de minimis exception, you have
requested, on behalf of your client FIA, clarification of the timeline within which non-clearing
member swap dealers must come into compliance with their reporting obligations under Part 20.
Specifically, you have requested confirmation that, taking into account the clarified effect of the
de minimis exception, the No-Action Letter can be interpreted as providing reporting relief
periods that are to be calculated, with respect to any particular entity, from the date upon which

the Commission’s Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (“DSIO”) issued a staff no-action letter on
October 12, 2012 that provided relief from such notional threshold for certain transactions in utility commodity
swaps by certain non-financial entities
the Commission’s Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (“DSIO”) issued a staff no-action letter on
October 12, 2012 that provided relief from such notional threshold for certain transactions in utility commodity
swaps by certain non-financial entities. See “Staff No-Action Relief: Temporary Relief from the De Minimis
Threshold for Certain Swaps with Special Entities”, DSIO No-Action Letter 12-18 (October 12, 2012).
14 See 77 Fed. Reg. 2613, 2629 (January 19, 2012).
15 See supra note 3. The Division notes that interpretive guidance and no-action relief has recently been issued by
Commission staff that relates to the determination of when an entity’s swap dealing activities exceed one of the
notional thresholds. See, e.g. “Time-Limited No-Action Relief: Cleared Swaps in Agricultural and Exempt
Commodities and Swaps Exchanged for Futures Not to be Considered in Calculating Aggregate Gross Notional
Amount for Purposes of Swap Dealer De Minimis Exception”, DSIO No-Action Letter 12-16 (October 12, 2012);
“Time-Limited No-Action Relief: Swaps in Agricultural and Exempt Commodities Not to be Considered in
Calculating Aggregate Gross Notional Amount for Purposes of Swap Dealer De Minimis Exception and Calculation
of Whether a Person is a Major Swap Participant,” DSIO No-Action Letter 12-20 (October 12, 2012); “Frequently
Asked Questions (FAQ) – Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (“DSIO”) Responds to FAQs About
Swap Entities” (October 12, 2012), each available on the Commission’s website at www.cftc.gov.
ss Notional Amount for Purposes of Swap Dealer De Minimis Exception and Calculation
of Whether a Person is a Major Swap Participant,” DSIO No-Action Letter 12-20 (October 12, 2012); “Frequently
Asked Questions (FAQ) – Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (“DSIO”) Responds to FAQs About
Swap Entities” (October 12, 2012), each available on the Commission’s website at www.cftc.gov.

5
the entity applies for registration as a swap dealer after its swap dealing activities have exceeded
one of the notional thresholds.

As discussed above, the No-Action Letter contemplated that the “swap dealer registration
application date,” from which the reporting relief periods provided to non-clearing member swap
dealers would be calculated, would, pursuant to Section 3.10(a)(1)(v)(C)(2) of the Commission’s
regulations, be the effective date of final regulations further defining the term swap. These final
regulations were adopted by the Commission with an effective date of October 12, 2012.
Calculated from this date, the 60 day period of reporting relief provided by the No-Action Letter
would have extended until December 11, 2012,16 and the additional six months of reporting relief
provided to Section 20.10(e) swap dealers would have extended until June 11, 2013.

The Division acknowledges, however, that taking into account the clarified effect of the de
minimis exception, the 60 day period of reporting relief provided by the No-Action Letter
expired before the earliest deadline – on December 31, 2012 – by which any entity is required to
apply for registration as, and thereby become subject to the regulatory obligations of, a swap
dealer. The Division notes further that, prior to the issuance of this letter, and as demonstrated
by the request for clarification that you submitted to the Division on December 6, 2012, there has
been some uncertainty among prospective swap dealers regarding the timeline within which they
must come into compliance with their Part 20 reporting obligations
he regulatory obligations of, a swap
dealer. The Division notes further that, prior to the issuance of this letter, and as demonstrated
by the request for clarification that you submitted to the Division on December 6, 2012, there has
been some uncertainty among prospective swap dealers regarding the timeline within which they
must come into compliance with their Part 20 reporting obligations. The Division therefore
believes that it is appropriate to make available to prospective swap dealers with upcoming swap
dealer registration deadlines an additional period of time to come into compliance with the
reporting requirements of Part 20.

Accordingly, the Division will not recommend that the Commission commence an enforcement
action against a non-clearing member swap dealer for failure to submit Section 20.4 reports for
the period from December 11, 2012 until March 1, 2013. Any entity that is relying on this no-
action relief must state that it is doing so in an e-mail to the Division at SwapsLTR@cftc.gov, by
no later than the date on which the entity applies for swap dealer registration.

Subject to the additional relief available to Section 20.10(e) swap dealers discussed below, on
and after March 1, 2013, an entity will be required to be in compliance with the reporting
requirements of Part 20 by the date that the entity becomes a swap dealer. As discussed above,
taking into account the de minimis exception, an entity will become a swap dealer on the earlier
of: (i) the date upon which the entity applies for registration as a swap dealer, or (ii) the entity’s
swap dealer registration deadline, which will be two months after the end of the month in which
the entity’s swap dealing activities exceed one of the notional thresholds
aler. As discussed above,
taking into account the de minimis exception, an entity will become a swap dealer on the earlier
of: (i) the date upon which the entity applies for registration as a swap dealer, or (ii) the entity’s
swap dealer registration deadline, which will be two months after the end of the month in which
the entity’s swap dealing activities exceed one of the notional thresholds. The effect of the de
minimis exception is to make available a period of at least two months, after an entity has
determined that its swap dealing activities have exceeded one of the notional thresholds, for the

16 Upon the expiration of the reporting relief period, and subject to the additional relief available to Section 20.10(e)
swap dealers, an entity would be required to be in compliance with the reporting requirements of Part 20 upon
becoming a swap dealer. Taking into account the clarified effect of the de minimis exception, the only entities that
will have become swap dealers prior to the earliest swap dealer registration deadline of December 31, 2012 will be
entities that have elected to apply for swap dealer registration prior to their swap dealer registration deadline. The
extended no-action relief provided herein is intended to include retroactive reporting relief from Part 20 for any
entity that became a swap dealer between December 11, 2012 and the date of issuance of this letter.
dealer registration deadline of December 31, 2012 will be
entities that have elected to apply for swap dealer registration prior to their swap dealer registration deadline. The
extended no-action relief provided herein is intended to include retroactive reporting relief from Part 20 for any
entity that became a swap dealer between December 11, 2012 and the date of issuance of this letter.

6
entity to apply for registration as, and thereby become subject to, the regulatory obligations of a
swap dealer, including the reporting requirements of Part 20. As reflected by the 60 day relief
period provided in the No-Action Letter, the Division believes that the de minimis exception
makes available an adequate amount of time, after an entity has confirmed its prospective
regulatory status as a swap dealer, for the entity to come into compliance with the reporting
requirements of Part 20.

The Division will not recommend that the Commission commence an enforcement action against
a Section 20.10(e) swap dealer for failure to submit Section 20.4 reports until September 1,
2013. Thus, an entity that becomes a swap dealer before September 1, 2013, and that satisfies
the conditions of Section 20.10(e), will have until September 1, 2013, at the latest, to comply
with the reporting requirements of Part 20. An entity that is relying on this additional period of
reporting relief must submit an e-mail to the Division at SwapsLTR@cftc.gov, no later than the
date that the entity applies for registration as a swap dealer, certifying that it meets the conditions
of Section 20.10(e), including the resource limitation or lack of reporting experience
requirement, and describing with specificity: (1) the resource limitations or lack of experience in
reporting transactions to the Commission that cause the entity to be unable to submit fully
compliant reports upon becoming a swap dealer, (2) the arrangements that are being made for
submitting fully compliant reports, and (3) the anticipated date of full compli
or lack of reporting experience
requirement, and describing with specificity: (1) the resource limitations or lack of experience in
reporting transactions to the Commission that cause the entity to be unable to submit fully
compliant reports upon becoming a swap dealer, (2) the arrangements that are being made for
submitting fully compliant reports, and (3) the anticipated date of full compliance with the
requirements of Part 20 as prescribed by the Division.

The additional relief period for Section 20.10(e) swap dealers extends until September 1, 2013.
On and after September 1, 2013, any entity, including an entity that satisfies the conditions of
Section 20.10(e), will be required to be in compliance with the reporting requirements of Part 20
by the date upon which the entity becomes a swap dealer, which, as discussed above, will be the
earlier of: (i) the date upon which the entity applies for registration as a swap dealer, or (ii) the
entity’s swap dealer registration deadline. An entity that anticipates not being able to submit
fully compliant reports by the date upon which it becomes a swap dealer would not, however, be
foreclosed from seeking discretionary relief from the Division.17

The Division encourages entities that anticipate becoming swap dealers to review the Part 20
reporting guidebook – available on the Commission’s website – that has been developed by the
Division in consultation with the Office of Data and Technology.18 The Division also
encourages entities that anticipate becoming swap dealers to begin submitting Section 20.4
reports in advance of their Part 20 compliance deadline. This will allow such entities to engage
with Commission staff to correct any reporting errors, thereby facilitating such entities’ ability to
submit fully compliant reports by the time that they are required to do so
chnology.18 The Division also
encourages entities that anticipate becoming swap dealers to begin submitting Section 20.4
reports in advance of their Part 20 compliance deadline. This will allow such entities to engage
with Commission staff to correct any reporting errors, thereby facilitating such entities’ ability to
submit fully compliant reports by the time that they are required to do so.

The Division reminds the public that other applicable provisions of Part 20, including the special
call provision of Section 20.5(b) and the books and records requirements of Section 20.6,
became effective on September 20, 2011.

17 See Section 140.99 of the Commission’s regulations. 17 C.F.R. § 140.99.
18See
http://www.cftc.gov/LawRegulation/DoddFrankAct/Rulemakings/XXXII.LargeSwapsTraderReporting/index.htm.

7
The no-action relief provided herein contains a collection of information, as that term is defined
in the Paperwork Reduction Act.19 Therefore, a control number for the collection must be
obtained from the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”). In accordance with 44 U.S.C. §
3507(d) and 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.8 and 1320.10, the Division will, by separate action, prepare an
information collection request for review and approval by OMB, and will publish in the Federal
Register a notice and request for public comments on the collection burdens associated with the
no-action relief. If approved, a non-clearing member swap dealer may not rely on the Division’s
determination not to recommend an enforcement action to the Commission unless the non-
clearing member swap dealer provides the information that the Division has determined is
essential to the provision of no-action relief.

This letter, and the no-action position taken herein, represent the views of the Division only, and
do not necessarily represent the position or views of the Commission or of any other division or
office of the Commission’s staff
Commission unless the non-
clearing member swap dealer provides the information that the Division has determined is
essential to the provision of no-action relief.

This letter, and the no-action position taken herein, represent the views of the Division only, and
do not necessarily represent the position or views of the Commission or of any other division or
office of the Commission’s staff. The no-action position taken herein does not excuse affected
persons from compliance with any other applicable requirements of the Commodity Exchange
Act or the Commission’s regulations thereunder. As with all no-action letters, the Division
retains the authority to condition further, modify, suspend, terminate or otherwise restrict the
terms of the no-action relief provided herein, in its discretion.
If you have any questions regarding the content of this letter, please contact Nora Flood at
nflood@cftc.gov or (202) 418-5354.

Sincerely,

Richard A. Shilts
Acting Director
Division of Market Oversight

19 44 U.S.C. §§ 3501 et. seq.

## Nearby sections

- [CFTC Letter No. 08-03 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of Eight Futures Contracts Based on Security Indices Derived from the Dow Jones STOXX 600 Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_03.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-05 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the RDXxt USD-RDX Extended Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_05.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-11 Euronext Paris SAs request for no-action relief in connection with the offer and sale in the United States of its futures contracts based on the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Europe Index and the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Euro Zone Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_11.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-13 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contracts Based on the SLI Swiss Leader Index, the Swiss Market Index Midcap, the Dow Jones Eur...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_13.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-15 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight granted exemptive relief from certain of the Part 4 regulations to the registered CPO of a commodity pool, whose shares the CPO intended to publicly offer and to lis...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_15.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-17 DCIO received a request for guidance from the Joint Audit Committee concerning FCM regulatory reporting requirements for investments in a money market mutual fund. The fund had announced that its net asset value per s...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_17.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-18 The Division of Market Oversight issued a letter granting no-action relief to permit the Brazilian Derivatives Exchange, BM&F Bovespa S.A. – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros (BM&F), to make its electronic tradi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_18.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-19 Thailand Futures Exchange Pcls Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the SET50 Index Futures Contract.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_19.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-21 The Division of Market Oversight issued a no-action letter to BNP Paribas confirming that the Division will not recommend that the Commission initiate enforcement action against BNP Paribas or Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., o...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_21.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-02 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partner of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_02.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-06 The CPO of a commodity pool requested that DCIO agree to accept the Annual Report for the period from January 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008 as the Pool’s final annual report despite the fact that the Pool had not f...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_06.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-07 The CPO of a commodity pool with a de minimus amount of its assets embroiled in a bankruptcy requested relief from the ongoing reporting requirements under Part 4. The CPO filed an Annual Report for the Pool for the 2...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_07.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-11 The CPO of two commodity pools requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_11.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-13 The CPO of commodity pool requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_13.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L12_51. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.