# CFTC Letter No. 12-46: Time-limited no-action relief for Part 20 Reporting Entities regarding identifying information and for Part 45 and Part 46 Reporting Counterparties regarding legal entity identifiers and other identifying information

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L12_46

## Section

- **Citation:** CFTC Letter No. 12-46
- **Heading:** Time-limited no-action relief for Part 20 Reporting Entities regarding identifying information and for Part 45 and Part 46 Reporting Counterparties regarding legal entity identifiers and other identifying information
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** CFTC Staff Letters (2008-present) / Time-limited no-action relief for Part 20 Reporting Entities regarding identifying information and for Part 45 and Part 46 Reporting Counterparties regarding legal entity identifiers and other identifying information.

## Text

Summary: Time-limited no-action relief for Part 20 Reporting Entities regarding identifying information and for Part 45 and Part 46 Reporting Counterparties regarding legal entity identifiers and other identifying information.

1

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5000
Facsimile: (202) 418-5521
www.cftc.gov

CFTC Letter No. 12-46
No-Action
December 7, 2012
Division of Market Oversight

Robert Pickel
Chief Executive Officer
International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20004

Time-Limited No-Action Relief for Part 20 Reporting Entities Regarding Identifying
Information and Time-Limited No-Action Relief for Part 45 and Part 46 Reporting
Counterparties Regarding Legal Entity Identifiers, Other Enumerated Identifiers or
Other Identifying Terms

Dear Mr. Pickel,

This is in response to your December 3, 2012 letter (the “Letter”) to the Division of Market
Oversight (the “Division”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”).
By the Letter, you requested, pursuant to § 140.99 of the Commission’s regulations, on behalf of
your members with reporting obligations and other similarly situated persons (collectively,
“Reporting Parties”) with reporting obligations under Parts 20, 45 or Part 46 of the
Commission’s regulations (collectively, the “Reporting Rules”),1 no-action relief from certain
requirements of the Reporting Rules that require the reporting of what you term “Identity
Information.”2

In the Letter, you state that there exist potential conflicts between the Commission’s Reporting
Rules and the privacy laws of certain non-U.S. jurisdictions.3 You represent that the privacy
laws of some non-U.S. jurisdictions may, in certain circumstances, restrict or prohibit the
disclosure of a non-Reporting Party’s Identity Information by a Reporting Party
erm “Identity
Information.”2

In the Letter, you state that there exist potential conflicts between the Commission’s Reporting
Rules and the privacy laws of certain non-U.S. jurisdictions.3 You represent that the privacy
laws of some non-U.S. jurisdictions may, in certain circumstances, restrict or prohibit the
disclosure of a non-Reporting Party’s Identity Information by a Reporting Party. You further
represent that depending on the non-U.S. jurisdiction, disclosure of Identity Information may
require non-Reporting Party consent, regulatory authorization, or both. In light of your concerns,

1 You note that the relief requested in the Letter also encompasses § 23.204 and § 23.205 of the Commission’s
regulations.
2 You define “Identity Information” as “information that would otherwise be required to appear in one of the fields
specified in Annex B [of the Letter] and that identifies or would intrinsically reveal the identity of the counterparty
or its affiliated group.”
3 You refer to the comment letter dated August 27, 2012. See ISDA “Comment Letter on the Cross-Border
Application of Certain Swaps Provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (RIN 3038-AD57)” (August 27, 2012).

2

you request no-action relief from the requirements of what you term a “Trade Participant” to
report certain Identity Information pursuant to Parts 20, 45 and 46, in circumstances where
reporting Identity Information would violate the privacy laws of a non-U.S. jurisdiction.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”)4
added to the Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”) provisions requiring the retention and
reporting of data related to swap transactions
tain Identity Information pursuant to Parts 20, 45 and 46, in circumstances where
reporting Identity Information would violate the privacy laws of a non-U.S. jurisdiction.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”)4
added to the Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”) provisions requiring the retention and
reporting of data related to swap transactions. Section 727 of the Dodd-Frank Act added CEA
Section 2(a)(13), which establishes requirements for the real-time reporting and public
availability of swap transaction data, and requires that all swaps, both cleared and uncleared, be
reported to a registered swap data repository (“SDR”). Section 728 of the Dodd-Frank Act
added CEA Section 21(b), which directs the Commission to prescribe standards for swap data
recordkeeping and reporting. Section 723 of the Dodd-Frank Act added to the CEA new Section
2(h)(5), which addressed the reporting of swap data for both swaps executed before the
enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act and swaps executed on or after the date of that enactment.

Pursuant to these newly added provisions of the CEA, the Commission added to its regulations:
(i) Part 45,5 which establishes swap data recordkeeping and SDR reporting requirements and (ii)
Part 46,6 which establishes swap data recordkeeping and SDR reporting requirements for pre-
enactment swaps and transition swaps (collectively, “historical swaps”). Under each of Parts 45
and 46 (collectively, the “swap data reporting rules”) Reporting Parties have swap data reporting
obligations.

Part 20 of the Commission’s regulations sets forth large trader reporting rules for physical
commodity swaps.7 Part 20 requires routine swaps position reports from clearing organizations,
clearing members and swap dealers, and establishes certain non-routine reporting requirements
for large swaps traders
“swap data reporting rules”) Reporting Parties have swap data reporting
obligations.

Part 20 of the Commission’s regulations sets forth large trader reporting rules for physical
commodity swaps.7 Part 20 requires routine swaps position reports from clearing organizations,
clearing members and swap dealers, and establishes certain non-routine reporting requirements
for large swaps traders.

Part 45 and Part 46 of the Commission’s regulations prescribe certain data fields which must be
included in swap data reporting.8 For all swaps subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission,
each counterparty must be identified by means of a single legal entity identifier (“LEI”)9 in all

4 Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).
5 77 Fed. Reg. 2136 (January 13, 2012).
6 77 Fed. Reg. 35200 (June 12, 2012).
7 76 Fed. Reg. 43851 (July 22, 2011).
8 Appendix 1 to Part 45, Exhibits A-D set forth the Minimum Primary Economic Terms (“PET”) data fields for
swap data reporting pursuant to that part and Appendix 1 to Part 46, Exhibits A-D set forth the PET data fields for
historical swaps.
9 LEI is defined in § 45.6 of the Commission’s regulations. The current LEI designated by the Commission is
known as a CFTC Interim Compliant Identifier (“CICI”), but is hereinafter referred to as an (“LEI”) for ease of
reference. The relief granted in this Division letter applies both to CICIs and LEIs.
ppendix 1 to Part 46, Exhibits A-D set forth the PET data fields for
historical swaps.
9 LEI is defined in § 45.6 of the Commission’s regulations. The current LEI designated by the Commission is
known as a CFTC Interim Compliant Identifier (“CICI”), but is hereinafter referred to as an (“LEI”) for ease of
reference. The relief granted in this Division letter applies both to CICIs and LEIs.

3

swap data reporting pursuant to Part 4510 and Part 46.11 As such, a Reporting Counterparty12 has
reporting obligations under Part 45 and Part 46 that include providing certain PET data,
including the LEI of the non-Reporting Counterparty in swap data reported to a registered SDR.
Part 20 of the Commission’s regulations requires, among other things, that a Reporting Entity13
disclose the identity of the counterparty in respect of which positional information is being
reported in large swap trader reports and associated filings.14

I.
Legal Entity Identifier and Other Enumerated Identifiers.

For the purposes of this Division letter, the “Privacy Law Identifier” is a single identifier used by
all Reporting Counterparties, that is not an LEI, and that consists of free text communicating that
information has been withheld due to privacy law. In addition, for the purposes of this Division
letter, “Other Enumerated Identifiers” are: 1) the identity of the counterparty electing the clearing
requirement exception in CEA Section 2(h)(7) for all asset classes; 2) an indication of the
counterparty purchasing protection or an indication of the counterparty selling protection (but not
both) in the credit and equity asset classes; 3) the buyer or seller (but not both) in the commodity
asset class; and 4) for all asset classes, the internal identifier used by an SDR for a non-Reporting
Counterparty, exclusively in those cases where such internal identifier directly identifies the non-
Reporting Counterparty (e.g., the internal identifier used by an SDR is the name of the non-
Reporting Counterparty).15
quity asset classes; 3) the buyer or seller (but not both) in the commodity
asset class; and 4) for all asset classes, the internal identifier used by an SDR for a non-Reporting
Counterparty, exclusively in those cases where such internal identifier directly identifies the non-
Reporting Counterparty (e.g., the internal identifier used by an SDR is the name of the non-
Reporting Counterparty).15

10 Section 45.6 sets forth the requirements regarding the use of LEIs in all swap data reporting pursuant to Part 45 of
the Commission’s regulations. See also “Q & A – On Start of Swap Data Reporting” (October 9, 2012), issued by
Division of Market Oversight staff,
http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/startreporting_qa_final.pdf.
11 Section 46.4 sets forth the requirements regarding the use of LEIs in swap data reporting for historical swaps.
12 For the purposes of this Division letter, Reporting Counterparty has the meanings assigned in § 45.1 and § 46.1 of
the Commission’s regulations respectively, as applicable.
13 For the purposes of this Division letter, Reporting Entity has the meaning assigned in § 20.1 of the Commission’s
regulations.
14 See note 11, supra at 43863-4; See also “Large Trader Reporting for Physical Commodity Swaps: Division of
Market Oversight Guidebook for Part 20 Reports” (May 31, 2012), updated by Division of Market Oversight Staff,
http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/ltrguidebook053112.pdf.
15 In cases where “reporting confirmation data normalized in data fields is not yet technologically practicable,”
§ 45.3 permits reporting counterparties to report confirmation data through “an image of the document or documents
constituting the confirmation” for 180 days following the compliance date. See § 45.3(b)(3); § 45.3(c)(1)(iii); §
45.3(c)(2)(iii); and § 45.3(d)(3)
debook053112.pdf.
15 In cases where “reporting confirmation data normalized in data fields is not yet technologically practicable,”
§ 45.3 permits reporting counterparties to report confirmation data through “an image of the document or documents
constituting the confirmation” for 180 days following the compliance date. See § 45.3(b)(3); § 45.3(c)(1)(iii); §
45.3(c)(2)(iii); and § 45.3(d)(3). The relief provided in this Division letter also permits Reporting Counterparties to
temporarily withhold reporting of such images (hereinafter, “§ 45.3 images”) in cases where they would include
Legal Entity Identifiers, Other Enumerated Identifiers, and Other Identifying Terms (as defined below) that would
otherwise require manual redaction. The relief provided in this Division letter in no way limits the obligation of a
Reporting Counterparty to otherwise comply with § 45.3, including the provision of “confirmation data normalized
in data fields” as required by Commission regulations.

4

Based upon your representations,16 the Division believes that time-limited relief for Reporting
Counterparties from the requirement to report the LEIs of their non-Reporting Counterparties
(the “Opposite LEI”) and Other Enumerated Identifiers pursuant to Parts 45 and 46 is warranted
under specific conditions.17

Accordingly, the Division will not recommend that the Commission commence an enforcement
action against a Reporting Counterparty for failure to report the Opposite LEI and Other
Enumerated Identifiers for any swap for which the Reporting Counterparty has:

(i)
formed a reasonable belief that:18
(a) based on a written opinion of outside legal counsel, statutory or regulatory
prohibitions in non-U.S. jurisdictions preclude the Reporting Counterparty
from reporting the Opposite LEI and Other Enumerated Identifiers to a
registered SDR as required by Parts 45 and 46; or
merated Identifiers for any swap for which the Reporting Counterparty has:

(i)
formed a reasonable belief that:18
(a) based on a written opinion of outside legal counsel, statutory or regulatory
prohibitions in non-U.S. jurisdictions preclude the Reporting Counterparty
from reporting the Opposite LEI and Other Enumerated Identifiers to a
registered SDR as required by Parts 45 and 46; or
(b) (1) based on a written opinion of outside legal counsel, common law in a non-
U.S. jurisdiction could expose the Reporting Counterparty to criminal or civil
liability for reporting the Opposite LEI and Other Enumerated Identifiers to a
registered SDR as required by Parts 45 and 46; and (2) the Reporting
Counterparty determines that there is a material risk that the non-Reporting
Counterparty or regulatory authority may initiate litigation; and
(ii)
not yet obtained consent from such non-Reporting Counterparty or the relevant
non-U.S. regulatory authorization with respect to such non-Reporting
Counterparty, as applicable, to disclose the Opposite LEI and Other Enumerated
Identifiers; and
(iii)
made reasonable and demonstrable efforts to obtain such consent or regulatory
authorization, as applicable.19

16 Specifically, the relief provided in this Division letter is premised on the representations made in your December
3, 2012 Letter, which makes reference to your “Comment Letter on the Cross-Border Application of Certain Swap
Provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act,” dated August 27, 2012. The relief provided in this Division letter is
also premised on your letter to Chairman Gensler dated July 3, 2012 (“CFTC Reporting Rules – Compliance
Challenges”) and the legal analysis attached thereto.
17 Section 23.204 requires swap dealers and major swap participants to comply with Part 45 of the Commission’s
regulations. To that extent only, section 23.204 is incorporated by reference into the no-action relief herein
ision letter is
also premised on your letter to Chairman Gensler dated July 3, 2012 (“CFTC Reporting Rules – Compliance
Challenges”) and the legal analysis attached thereto.
17 Section 23.204 requires swap dealers and major swap participants to comply with Part 45 of the Commission’s
regulations. To that extent only, section 23.204 is incorporated by reference into the no-action relief herein.
18 With respect to the jurisdictions listed in Appendix A to your “Comment Letter on the Cross-Border Application
of Certain Swap Provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act,” dated August 27, 2012 (excluding the United States),
the no-action relief granted in this Division letter requires that Reporting Counterparties and Reporting Entities be in
possession of the necessary written opinions of outside legal counsel at such time as they avail themselves of the no-
action relief. With respect to other jurisdictions, Reporting Counterparties and Reporting Entities may avail
themselves of relief upon the effectiveness of this letter, but are not required to obtain the necessary written opinions
of outside legal counsel until January 31, 2013.
19 The Division notes that “reasonable and demonstrable efforts” as used in parts I, II, and III of this Division letter
shall include direct efforts by a Reporting Counterparty or Reporting Entity to obtain the consent of a non-Reporting

5

The Division will extend this relief until the earlier of: 1) such time as the Reporting
Counterparty has obtained consent from such non-Reporting Counterparty or regulatory
authorization, as applicable, to report the Opposite LEI and Other Enumerated Identifiers; 2)
such time as the Reporting Counterparty no longer holds a reasonable belief that non-U.S.
privacy law(s) preclude it from reporting the Opposite LEI and Other Enumerated Identifiers; or
3) 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time June 30, 2013. Such no-action relief is subject to the
following conditions:

i
thorization, as applicable, to report the Opposite LEI and Other Enumerated Identifiers; 2)
such time as the Reporting Counterparty no longer holds a reasonable belief that non-U.S.
privacy law(s) preclude it from reporting the Opposite LEI and Other Enumerated Identifiers; or
3) 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time June 30, 2013. Such no-action relief is subject to the
following conditions:

i.
The Reporting Counterparty shall retain, as part of its compliance with
Commission recordkeeping requirements, written evidence of its reasonable and
demonstrable efforts to obtain non-Reporting Counterparty consent or the relevant
non-U.S. regulatory authorization, as applicable;
ii.
The Reporting Counterparty shall retain, as part of its compliance with
Commission recordkeeping requirements, a copy of the written opinion of outside
legal counsel on which it based its reasonable belief regarding non-U.S. privacy
law(s) as they pertain to reporting the Opposite LEI and Other Enumerated
Identifiers to a registered SDR;
iii.
The Reporting Counterparty shall include the Privacy Law Identifier with all
swap data reported pursuant to Parts 45 or 46 in each instance in which it would
otherwise have been required to report an Opposite LEI or Other Enumerated
Identifier; and
iv.
Upon the expiration of the relief in this section pursuant to any of clause 1), 2), or
3), above, a Reporting Counterparty shall correct all Privacy Law Identifiers,
previously submitted to an SDR pursuant to this Division letter, with the
corresponding Opposite LEIs, Other Enumerated Identifiers, and § 45.3 Images20
by no later than 30 days from the date of such expiration. Prior to making such
corrections, a Reporting Counterparty shall notify the relevant SDR.

II
2), or
3), above, a Reporting Counterparty shall correct all Privacy Law Identifiers,
previously submitted to an SDR pursuant to this Division letter, with the
corresponding Opposite LEIs, Other Enumerated Identifiers, and § 45.3 Images20
by no later than 30 days from the date of such expiration. Prior to making such
corrections, a Reporting Counterparty shall notify the relevant SDR.

II.
Limited Relief for the data fields titled “Any other term(s) of the swap matched or
affirmed by the counterparties in verifying the swap” in the Interest Rate and Other
Commodity Asset Classes and “Any other term(s) of the trade matched or affirmed
by the counterparties in verifying the trade” in the Foreign Exchange Asset Class.

Counterparty. While Reporting Counterparties may exercise reasonable reliance upon the initiatives of industry
associations, such reliance shall not be deemed an acceptable substitute for reasonable and demonstrable efforts
directly by a Reporting Counterparty in instances where such initiatives fail to obtain the consent of individual non-
Reporting Counterparties prior to the expiration of the no-action relief provided herein.
20 If reporting confirmation data normalized in data fields is technologically practicable at the time a Reporting
Counterparty submits a corrected Privacy Law Identifier, then such Reporting Counterparty shall submit its
correction(s) in an electronic format as required by Part 45.

6

For the purposes of this Division letter, “Other Identifying Term” means a term of a swap that a
Reporting Counterparty reasonably believes would identify the non-Reporting Counterparty if
disclosed, and is required to be reported pursuant to the following Part 45 data fields:21
Reporting Counterparty shall submit its
correction(s) in an electronic format as required by Part 45.

6

For the purposes of this Division letter, “Other Identifying Term” means a term of a swap that a
Reporting Counterparty reasonably believes would identify the non-Reporting Counterparty if
disclosed, and is required to be reported pursuant to the following Part 45 data fields:21
(1) For swaps in the Foreign Exchange asset class (other than cross-currency swaps), the
“Any other term(s) of the trade matched or affirmed by the counterparties in verifying
the trade” data field required by Appendix 1 to Part 45, Exhibit B;
(2) For swaps in the Interest Rate asset class (including cross-currency swaps), the “Any
other term(s) of the swap matched or affirmed by the counterparties in verifying the
swap” data field required by Appendix 1 to Part 45, Exhibit C; and
(3) For swaps in the Other Commodity asset class the “Any other term(s) of the swap
matched or affirmed by the counterparties in verifying the swap” data field required
by Appendix 1 to Part 45, Exhibit D.
Based upon your representations,22 the Division believes that time-limited relief for Reporting
Counterparties from the requirement to report an Other Identifying Term that a Reporting
Counterparty reasonably believes would identify a non-Reporting Counterparty is warranted
under the following specific conditions.

Accordingly, the Division will not recommend that the Commission commence an enforcement
action against a Reporting Counterparty for failure to report an Other Identifying Term for any
swap for which the Reporting Counterparty has:

(i)
formed a reasonable belief that:23
(a) based on a written opinion of outside legal counsel, statutory or regulatory
prohibitions in non-U.S. jurisdictions preclude the Reporting Counterparty
from reporting an Other Identifying Term to a registered SDR as required by
Part 45; or
rty for failure to report an Other Identifying Term for any
swap for which the Reporting Counterparty has:

(i)
formed a reasonable belief that:23
(a) based on a written opinion of outside legal counsel, statutory or regulatory
prohibitions in non-U.S. jurisdictions preclude the Reporting Counterparty
from reporting an Other Identifying Term to a registered SDR as required by
Part 45; or
(b) (1) based on a written opinion of outside legal counsel, common law in a non-
U.S. jurisdiction could expose the Reporting Counterparty to criminal or civil
liability for reporting an Other Identifying Term to a registered SDR as
required by Part 45; and (2) the Reporting Counterparty determines that there
is a material risk that the individual non-Reporting Counterparty or regulatory
authority may initiate litigation; and
(ii)
not yet obtained consent from such non-Reporting Counterparty or the relevant
non-U.S. regulatory authorization with respect to such non-Reporting
Counterparty, as applicable, to disclose the Other Identifying Term; and

21 Information required by the data fields specified in items (1), (2), and (3) of section II of this Division letter, but
which is not an Other Identifying Term, must continue to be reported as required by Part 45.
22 See note 16, supra.
23 See note 18, supra.

7

(iii)
made reasonable and demonstrable efforts to obtain such consent or regulatory
authorization, as applicable.24

The Division will extend this relief until the earlier of: 1) such time as the Reporting
Counterparty has obtained consent from such non-Reporting Counterparty or regulatory
authorization, as applicable, to report the Other Identifying Term; 2) such time as the Reporting
Counterparty no longer holds a reasonable belief that non-U.S. privacy law(s) preclude it from
reporting the Other Identifying Term; or 3) 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time June 30, 2013
such time as the Reporting
Counterparty has obtained consent from such non-Reporting Counterparty or regulatory
authorization, as applicable, to report the Other Identifying Term; 2) such time as the Reporting
Counterparty no longer holds a reasonable belief that non-U.S. privacy law(s) preclude it from
reporting the Other Identifying Term; or 3) 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time June 30, 2013. Such
no-action relief is subject to the following conditions:

i.
The Reporting Counterparty shall retain, as part of its compliance with Commission
recordkeeping requirements, written evidence of its reasonable and demonstrable
efforts to obtain non-Reporting Counterparty consent or the relevant non-U.S.
regulatory authorization, as applicable;

ii.
The Reporting Counterparty shall retain, as part of its compliance with Commission
recordkeeping requirements, a copy of the written opinion of outside legal counsel on
which it based its reasonable belief regarding non-U.S. privacy law(s) as they pertain
to reporting an Other Identifying Term to a registered SDR;

iii.
The Reporting Counterparty shall include all terms, which are not an Other
Identifying Term, required to be reported pursuant to Part 45;25 and
iv.
Upon the expiration of the relief in this section pursuant to any of clause 1), 2), or 3),
above, a Reporting Counterparty shall correct all Other Identifying Terms, previously
omitted or submitted in a masked form to an SDR pursuant to this Division letter,
with the corresponding Other Identifying Term and § 45.3 Images,26 by no later than
30 days from the date of such expiration. Prior to making such corrections, a
Reporting Counterparty shall notify the relevant SDR.

III.
Certain Counterparty Information Required by Part 20 of the Commission’s
Regulations
y
omitted or submitted in a masked form to an SDR pursuant to this Division letter,
with the corresponding Other Identifying Term and § 45.3 Images,26 by no later than
30 days from the date of such expiration. Prior to making such corrections, a
Reporting Counterparty shall notify the relevant SDR.

III.
Certain Counterparty Information Required by Part 20 of the Commission’s
Regulations.

In addressing your request for Part 20 relief, this Division letter uses the term “Part 20
Identifying Information” to mean the following counterparty information:

24 See note 19, supra.
25 Nothing in section II of this Division letter should be interpreted as altering the responsibility of a Reporting
Counterparty to report all swap data that is not an Other Identifying Term or otherwise addressed by this Division
letter.
26 If reporting confirmation data normalized in data fields is technologically practicable at the time a Reporting
Counterparty submits a corrected Other Identifying Term, then such Reporting Counterparty shall submit its
correction(s) in an electronic format as required by Part 45.

8

(1) The counterparty name field in § 20.4 submissions; and
(2) The following counterparty information included in a 102S filing pursuant to § 20.5:
(a) Name
(b) Address (except that the country of the counterparty shall be provided)
(c) Contact Name
(d) Contact Job Title
(e) Contact Phone
(f) Contact Email

Based upon your representations,27 the Division believes that time-limited relief for a Reporting
Entity from the requirement to report Part 20 Identifying Information pursuant to § 20.4 and
§ 20.5 of the Commission’s regulations is warranted under specific conditions.28

Accordingly, the Division will not recommend that the Commission commence an enforcement
action against a Reporting Entity for failure to report Part 20 Identifying Information for any
§ 20.4 or § 20.5 submission for which the Reporting Entity has:
eport Part 20 Identifying Information pursuant to § 20.4 and
§ 20.5 of the Commission’s regulations is warranted under specific conditions.28

Accordingly, the Division will not recommend that the Commission commence an enforcement
action against a Reporting Entity for failure to report Part 20 Identifying Information for any
§ 20.4 or § 20.5 submission for which the Reporting Entity has:
(i)
formed a reasonable belief that:29
(a) based on a written opinion of outside legal counsel, statutory or regulatory
prohibitions in non-U.S. jurisdictions preclude the Reporting Entity from
submitting Part 20 Identifying Information for such counterparty to the
Commission; or
(b) (1) based on a written opinion of outside legal counsel, common law in a non-
U.S. jurisdiction could expose the Reporting Entity to criminal or civil
liability for submitting Part 20 Identifying Information for such counterparty
to the Commission; and (2) the Reporting Entity determines that there is a
material risk that the individual counterparty or regulatory authority may
initiate litigation; and
(ii)
not yet obtained consent for the disclosure of Part 20 Identifying Information
from such counterparty or the relevant non-U.S. regulatory authorization with
respect to such counterparty, as applicable; and
(iii)
made reasonable and demonstrable efforts to obtain such consent or regulatory
authorization, as applicable.30

27 See note 16, supra.
28 Nothing in this Division letter should be interpreted as altering the responsibility of a Reporting Entity to make
reports required by § 20.4 and to make 102S filings pursuant to § 20.5, even if information in such filing is masked
pursuant to this Division letter.
29 See note 18, supra.
30 See note 19, supra.
.30

27 See note 16, supra.
28 Nothing in this Division letter should be interpreted as altering the responsibility of a Reporting Entity to make
reports required by § 20.4 and to make 102S filings pursuant to § 20.5, even if information in such filing is masked
pursuant to this Division letter.
29 See note 18, supra.
30 See note 19, supra.

9

The Division will extend this relief until the earlier of: 1) such time as the Reporting Entity has
obtained consent from such counterparty to disclose Part 20 Identifying Information or
regulatory authorization, as applicable, for such counterparty; 2) such time as the Reporting
Entity no longer holds a reasonable belief that that non-U.S. privacy law(s) preclude it from
disclosing the Part 20 Identifying Information; or 3) 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time June 30,
2013. Such no-action relief is subject to the following conditions:

i.
The Reporting Entity shall retain, as part of its compliance with Commission
recordkeeping requirements, written evidence of its reasonable and demonstrable
efforts to obtain counterparty consent or the relevant non-U.S. regulatory
authorization, as applicable;
ii.
The Reporting Entity shall retain, as part of its compliance with Commission
recordkeeping requirements, a copy of the written opinion of outside legal counsel
on which it based its reasonable belief regarding non-U.S. privacy law(s) as they
pertain to submitting Part 20 Identifying Information for such counterparty to the
Commission;
iii.
The Reporting Entity shall make a Form 102S filing for the counterparty in
accordance with § 20.5, which filing shall include the country of such
counterparty and an indication of the Part 20 Identifying Information of the
counterparty redacted pursuant to this Division letter;
iv
s) as they
pertain to submitting Part 20 Identifying Information for such counterparty to the
Commission;
iii.
The Reporting Entity shall make a Form 102S filing for the counterparty in
accordance with § 20.5, which filing shall include the country of such
counterparty and an indication of the Part 20 Identifying Information of the
counterparty redacted pursuant to this Division letter;
iv.
The Reporting Entity shall report that information has been withheld due to
privacy law for each Part 20 Identifying Information field not reported pursuant to
this Division letter; and
v.
Upon the expiration of the relief in this section pursuant to any of clause 1), 2), or
3), above, a Reporting Entity shall make a corrective Part 20 data submission for
all Part 20 Identifying Information that was previously withheld or submitted in a
masked form pursuant to this Division letter, by no later than 30 days from the
date of such expiration. The Reporting Entity shall contact the Commission’s
Office of Data and Technology (“ODT”) prior to making such corrective Part 20
data submission, and such submission shall be in a form and manner acceptable to
ODT.
The no-action relief provided in this Division letter applies to Reporting Counterparties and
Reporting Entities, regardless of whether they are members of ISDA. It is time-limited, and
expires no later than 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time June 30, 2013. It applies only to LEIs
and Other Enumerated Identifiers pursuant to Parts 45 and 46, Other Identifying Terms pursuant
to Part 45 and Part 20 Identifying Information. Further, the no-action relief provided in this
Division letter in no way limits the Commission’s authority to request and obtain a non-
Reporting Party’s Identity Information.
:01 a.m. eastern daylight time June 30, 2013. It applies only to LEIs
and Other Enumerated Identifiers pursuant to Parts 45 and 46, Other Identifying Terms pursuant
to Part 45 and Part 20 Identifying Information. Further, the no-action relief provided in this
Division letter in no way limits the Commission’s authority to request and obtain a non-
Reporting Party’s Identity Information.

10

The no-action relief provided herein contains a collection of information, as that term is defined
in the Paperwork Reduction Act.31 Therefore, a control number for the collection must be
obtained from the Office of Management and Budget. In accordance with 44 U.S.C. § 3507(d)
and 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.8 and 1320.10, the Division will, by separate action, prepare an
information collection request for review and approval by OMB, and will publish in the Federal
Register a notice and request for public comments on the collection burdens associated with the
no-action relief. If approved, a Reporting Counterparty or Reporting Entity may not rely on the
Division's determination not to recommend an enforcement action to the Commission unless it
provides the information the Division has determined is essential to the provision of no-action
relief.

The Division’s letter, and the no-action position taken herein, which is based on your
representations, reflects the views of the Division only, and not necessarily the position or views
of the Commission or of any other division or office of the Commission’s staff. The no-action
position taken herein does not excuse affected persons from compliance with any other
applicable requirements of the CEA or the regulations thereunder. As with all no-action letters,
the Division retains the authority to, in its discretion, further condition, modify, suspend,
terminate or otherwise restrict the terms of the no-action relief provided herein
e Commission’s staff. The no-action
position taken herein does not excuse affected persons from compliance with any other
applicable requirements of the CEA or the regulations thereunder. As with all no-action letters,
the Division retains the authority to, in its discretion, further condition, modify, suspend,
terminate or otherwise restrict the terms of the no-action relief provided herein.
If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please contact Sebastian Pujol Schott,
Associate Director, Division of Market Oversight, at (202) 418-5641, or Stuart Armstrong,
Attorney Advisor, Division of Market Oversight, at (202) 418-5095.

Sincerely yours,

_______________________________

Richard A. Shilts
Acting Director
Division of Market Oversight

31 44 U.S.C. §§ 3501 et. seq.

## Nearby sections

- [CFTC Letter No. 08-03 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of Eight Futures Contracts Based on Security Indices Derived from the Dow Jones STOXX 600 Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_03.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-05 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the RDXxt USD-RDX Extended Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_05.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-11 Euronext Paris SAs request for no-action relief in connection with the offer and sale in the United States of its futures contracts based on the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Europe Index and the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Euro Zone Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_11.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-13 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contracts Based on the SLI Swiss Leader Index, the Swiss Market Index Midcap, the Dow Jones Eur...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_13.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-15 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight granted exemptive relief from certain of the Part 4 regulations to the registered CPO of a commodity pool, whose shares the CPO intended to publicly offer and to lis...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_15.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-17 DCIO received a request for guidance from the Joint Audit Committee concerning FCM regulatory reporting requirements for investments in a money market mutual fund. The fund had announced that its net asset value per s...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_17.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-18 The Division of Market Oversight issued a letter granting no-action relief to permit the Brazilian Derivatives Exchange, BM&F Bovespa S.A. – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros (BM&F), to make its electronic tradi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_18.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-19 Thailand Futures Exchange Pcls Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the SET50 Index Futures Contract.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_19.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-21 The Division of Market Oversight issued a no-action letter to BNP Paribas confirming that the Division will not recommend that the Commission initiate enforcement action against BNP Paribas or Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., o...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_21.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-02 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partner of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_02.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-06 The CPO of a commodity pool requested that DCIO agree to accept the Annual Report for the period from January 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008 as the Pool’s final annual report despite the fact that the Pool had not f...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_06.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-07 The CPO of a commodity pool with a de minimus amount of its assets embroiled in a bankruptcy requested relief from the ongoing reporting requirements under Part 4. The CPO filed an Annual Report for the Pool for the 2...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_07.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-11 The CPO of two commodity pools requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_11.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-13 The CPO of commodity pool requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_13.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L12_46. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.