# CFTC Letter No. 12-32: Time-Limited No-Action Relief for Swap Dealers from Certain Swap Data Reporting Requirements of Part 43, Part 45 and Part 46 of the Commission’s Regulations

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L12_32

## Section

- **Citation:** CFTC Letter No. 12-32
- **Heading:** Time-Limited No-Action Relief for Swap Dealers from Certain Swap Data Reporting Requirements of Part 43, Part 45 and Part 46 of the Commission’s Regulations
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** CFTC Staff Letters (2008-present) / Time-Limited No-Action Relief for Swap Dealers from Certain Swap Data Reporting Requirements of Part 43, Part 45 and Part 46 of the Commission’s Regulations.

## Text

Summary: Time-Limited No-Action Relief for Swap Dealers from Certain Swap Data Reporting Requirements of Part 43, Part 45 and Part 46 of the Commission’s Regulations.

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5000
Facsimile: (202) 418-5521
www.cftc.gov
Division of Swap Dealer and
Intermediary Oversight
Division of Market Oversight

CFTC Letter No. 12-32
No-Action
November 19, 2012
Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight
Division of Market Oversight

Time-Limited No-Action Relief for Swap Dealers from Certain Swap Data Reporting
Requirements of Part 43, Part 45 and Part 46 of the Commission’s Regulations

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter responds to requests received from multiple parties, by the Division of Swap Dealer
and Intermediary Oversight (“DSIO”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(“Commission”), and by the Commission’s Division of Market Oversight (“DMO”), to provide
no-action relief from certain requirements of the Commission’s swap data reporting rules, in
order to allow for a common monthly compliance date for swap dealers newly falling within the
scope of those rules, and to extend the compliance date for reporting historical swap transaction
data pursuant to Part 46 of the Commission’s regulations.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”)1
added to the Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”)2 provisions requiring the retention and
reporting of data relating to swap transactions. Section 727 of the Dodd-Frank Act added CEA
Section 2(a)(13), which establishes requirements for the real-time reporting and public
availability of swap transaction data, and requires that all swaps, both cleared and uncleared, be
reported to a registered swap data repository (“SDR”)
hange Act (the “CEA”)2 provisions requiring the retention and
reporting of data relating to swap transactions. Section 727 of the Dodd-Frank Act added CEA
Section 2(a)(13), which establishes requirements for the real-time reporting and public
availability of swap transaction data, and requires that all swaps, both cleared and uncleared, be
reported to a registered swap data repository (“SDR”). Section 728 of the Dodd-Frank Act
added CEA Section 21(b), which directs the Commission to prescribe standards for swap data
recordkeeping and reporting. Sections 723 and 729 of the Dodd-Frank Act added CEA Sections
2(h)(5) and 4r, respectively, which, among other things, establish reporting requirements for
swaps in effect as of the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, as well as swaps entered into after
such enactment but prior to the effective date for compliance with the Commission’s final swap
data recordkeeping and reporting rules.

Pursuant to these newly added provisions of the CEA, the Commission has added to its
regulations Part 43,3 which sets forth rules for the real-time public reporting of swap transaction

1 Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).
2 7 U.S.C. 1, et seq.
3 77 Fed. Reg.1182 (January 9, 2012).

Page 2

data; Part 45,4 which establishes swap data recordkeeping and SDR reporting requirements; and
Part 46,5 which establishes swap data recordkeeping and SDR reporting requirements for pre-
enactment swaps6 and transition swaps7 (collectively, “historical swaps”). Swap dealers have
reporting obligations under each of Part 43, Part 45 and Part 46 (referred to collectively herein as
the “swap data reporting rules”)
which establishes swap data recordkeeping and SDR reporting requirements; and
Part 46,5 which establishes swap data recordkeeping and SDR reporting requirements for pre-
enactment swaps6 and transition swaps7 (collectively, “historical swaps”). Swap dealers have
reporting obligations under each of Part 43, Part 45 and Part 46 (referred to collectively herein as
the “swap data reporting rules”).

Recent Commission staff guidance has clarified the effect of Commission Regulation 1.3(ggg)(4)
(the “de minimis exception”)8 on when an entity must apply for registration as a swap dealer.9
Specifically, once an entity’s swap dealing activities have exceeded, in the aggregate, one of two
prescribed gross notional amount thresholds (the “notional thresholds”),10 the entity must apply
for registration as a swap dealer no later than the date that is two months after the end of the
month in which the notional threshold is exceeded (the “swap dealer registration deadline”). The
entity could elect, however, to apply for registration as a swap dealer at an earlier date.

For the first year after the regulatory framework for swaps and swap dealers comes into effect,
the swap positions that will be relevant in determining whether an entity’s swap dealing activities
have exceeded one of the notional thresholds will be the swap positions entered into by the entity
– and by any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the entity – after
October 12, 2012.11 As a result, the earliest date on which an entity could have exceeded one of
the notional thresholds was October 13, 2012. Such an entity will be required to apply for
registration as a swap dealer by December 31, 2012 – the entity’s swap dealer registration
deadline – although the entity could elect to apply for registration, and thereby become a swap
dealer, at an earlier date.

4 77 Fed. Reg. 2136 (January 13, 2012).
5 77 Fed. Reg. 35200 (June 12, 2012)
2012. Such an entity will be required to apply for
registration as a swap dealer by December 31, 2012 – the entity’s swap dealer registration
deadline – although the entity could elect to apply for registration, and thereby become a swap
dealer, at an earlier date.

4 77 Fed. Reg. 2136 (January 13, 2012).
5 77 Fed. Reg. 35200 (June 12, 2012).
6 A “pre-enactment swap” is a swap entered into prior to the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act (July 21, 2010), the
terms of which have not expired as of the date of enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act. See also Commission
Regulation 46.1, id. at 35226.
7 A “transition swap” is a swap entered into on or after the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act (July 21, 2010), and
prior to the compliance date for reporting historical swaps of the asset class to which the swap belongs, pursuant to
Part 46. See also Commission Regulation 46.1, supra note 5 at 35227.
8 77 Fed. Reg. 30596, 30744-45 (May 23, 2012).
9 “CFTC Staff Responds to Questions on Timing of Swap Dealer Registration Rules,” Commission Press Release
6348-12 (September 10, 2012).
10 As of October 12, 2012, the notional thresholds are: (1) $8 billion (which is a phase-in level that will subsequently
be adjusted in accordance with Commission Regulation 1.3(ggg)(4)); and (2) $25 million with regard to swaps in
which the counterparty is a “special entity” as defined in CEA Section 4s(h)(2)(C) and Commission Regulation
23.401(c). These thresholds consider all swap positions connected with the swap dealing activities of the entity, or
any other entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with such entity. See note 8, supra. With
regard to the “special entity” notional threshold, DSIO issued a staff no-action letter on October 12, 2012 that
provided relief from such notional threshold for certain transactions in utility commodity swaps by certain non-
financial entities. See CFTC Letter No. 12-18 (October 12, 2012).
11 See note 8, supra.
ntrolled by or under common control with such entity. See note 8, supra. With
regard to the “special entity” notional threshold, DSIO issued a staff no-action letter on October 12, 2012 that
provided relief from such notional threshold for certain transactions in utility commodity swaps by certain non-
financial entities. See CFTC Letter No. 12-18 (October 12, 2012).
11 See note 8, supra.

Page 3

In an October, 2012, release entitled “Q & A – On Start of Swap Data Reporting,”12 DMO staff
confirmed that the date upon which an entity is required to be in compliance with the reporting
obligations of a swap dealer under Part 45 and Part 46 is the earlier of: (i) the date upon which
the entity applies to be registered as a swap dealer, or (ii) the entity’s swap dealer registration
deadline. The date for compliance with the reporting obligations of a swap dealer under Part 43
would be determined in the same manner.

Concerns have been expressed, by market participants and other interested parties, regarding the
potential for differing compliance dates for swap dealer reporting under the swap data reporting
rules, in the event that one or more entities apply to register as swap dealers before their swap
dealer registration deadline. With respect to those entities whose swap dealing activities
exceeded one of the notional thresholds in the month of October, 2012, and that will therefore be
among the initial group of swap dealers required to comply with the swap data reporting rules, it
has been noted that the first such entity to apply to register as a swap dealer will also be the first
– and potentially, for some period of time, the only – entity to have its swap transaction and
pricing data publicly disseminated pursuant to Part 43
of October, 2012, and that will therefore be
among the initial group of swap dealers required to comply with the swap data reporting rules, it
has been noted that the first such entity to apply to register as a swap dealer will also be the first
– and potentially, for some period of time, the only – entity to have its swap transaction and
pricing data publicly disseminated pursuant to Part 43. The public dissemination of data
reported by one, or even a few, early registrants may facilitate the identification of parties to the
swaps for which data has been reported, raising concerns under Commission Regulation
43.4(d)(1).13

In addition, DSIO and DMO have been advised that, in at least some instances, market
participants have designed their swap data reporting infrastructure on the understanding that all
swap dealers would be required to begin reporting on the same day. DSIO and DMO have been
advised that, in order to accommodate differing compliance dates, costly last-minute
modifications to such infrastructure would be required in order to avoid reporting errors.

In light of the foregoing concerns, multiple parties have requested that a common monthly
compliance date be established for swap dealers newly falling within the scope of the swap data
reporting rules.

Separately, and on behalf of those of its members that will be subject to the swap data reporting
rules, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) has expressed concern
that reporting obligations with respect to historical swaps, under Part 46, will become effective at
the same time as reporting obligations under Part 43 and Part 45. ISDA has highlighted the large
volume of historical swaps data that will need to be reported by its members pursuant to Part 46,

12 “Q & A – On Start of Swap Data Reporting” (October 9, 2012), issued by DMO staff
espect to historical swaps, under Part 46, will become effective at
the same time as reporting obligations under Part 43 and Part 45. ISDA has highlighted the large
volume of historical swaps data that will need to be reported by its members pursuant to Part 46,

12 “Q & A – On Start of Swap Data Reporting” (October 9, 2012), issued by DMO staff. See
http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/startreporting_qa_final.pdf
13 Commission Regulation 43.4(d)(1) provides that swap transaction and pricing data that is publicly disseminated in
real time shall not disclose the identities of the parties to the swap or otherwise facilitate the identification of a party
to a swap, and that a registered SDR that accepts and publicly disseminates swap transaction and pricing data in real
time shall not publicly disseminate such data in a manner that discloses or otherwise facilitates the identification of a
party to a swap. See note 3, supra at 1246.

Page 4

and submits that it will be a significant technological and operational challenge to ensure that all
of this data is reported by the same date on which compliant daily reporting must begin under
Part 43 and Part 45. ISDA has therefore requested, on behalf of its members, a period of
transitional relief from the reporting requirements of Part 46, running from the date on which
reporting obligations under Part 43 and Part 45 become effective. ISDA submits that such a
transitional relief period will enable its members to gradually report historical swaps data over
the course of the relief period, thereby reducing the potential impact of Part 46 reporting on
members’ ability to come into compliance with their daily reporting obligations under Part 43
and Part 45.

DSIO and DMO believe that, to address all of the foregoing concerns, limited relief for swap
dealers from the compliance timeline contemplated by the swap data reporting rules is warranted
er
the course of the relief period, thereby reducing the potential impact of Part 46 reporting on
members’ ability to come into compliance with their daily reporting obligations under Part 43
and Part 45.

DSIO and DMO believe that, to address all of the foregoing concerns, limited relief for swap
dealers from the compliance timeline contemplated by the swap data reporting rules is warranted.
Accordingly, for any swap asset class in respect of which swap dealer reporting obligations are
then in effect under the swap data reporting rules, DSIO and DMO will not recommend that the
Commission take enforcement action against a swap dealer for failing to report swap transaction
data pursuant to Part 43 or Part 45 of the Commission’s regulations, until the earlier of: (i) 12:01
a.m. eastern time on the swap dealer registration deadline applicable to that swap dealer,
notwithstanding that the swap dealer may have applied to register as a swap dealer before its
applicable swap dealer registration deadline, or (ii) 12:01 a.m. eastern time on April 10, 2013.

Further, DSIO and DMO will not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action
against a swap dealer for failing to report historical swaps data pursuant to Part 46 of the
Commission’s regulations, until the earlier of: (i) 12:01 a.m. eastern time on the date that is 30
days after the date (as extended by the no-action relief provided herein) on which the swap dealer
is required to begin reporting swap transaction data pursuant to Part 43 and Part 45 for the asset
class to which the historical swap belongs, or (ii) 12:01 a.m. eastern time on April 10, 2013.
DSIO and DMO believe that a 30 day relief period makes available an adequate amount of time,
after a swap dealer is required to come into compliance with its reporting obligations under Part
43 and Part 45, for the swap dealer to complete its reporting of historical swaps data pursuant to
Part 46
t
class to which the historical swap belongs, or (ii) 12:01 a.m. eastern time on April 10, 2013.
DSIO and DMO believe that a 30 day relief period makes available an adequate amount of time,
after a swap dealer is required to come into compliance with its reporting obligations under Part
43 and Part 45, for the swap dealer to complete its reporting of historical swaps data pursuant to
Part 46. DSIO and DMO note that any swap dealer that anticipates needing more than 30 days to
complete its reporting of historical swaps data has the option of starting to report such data
before the 30 day relief period begins.

The no-action relief provided herein is time-limited, and ends in all respects at 12:01 a.m. eastern
time on April 10, 2013 – which is the date by which any swap counterparty that is not a swap
dealer or a major swap participant is required to be in full compliance with the swap data
reporting rules.14 Since all swap counterparties are required to be in full compliance with the
swap data reporting rules by April 10, 2013, regardless of whether they fall within the definition
of a swap dealer, DSIO and DMO do not believe that it is appropriate to extend the no-action
relief provided herein beyond that date. On and after April 10, 2013, all swap counterparties –

14 With respect to Part 43, see note 3, supra at 1228; with respect to Part 45, see note 4, supra at 2197; and with
respect to Part 46, see note 5, supra at 35226.
p dealer, DSIO and DMO do not believe that it is appropriate to extend the no-action
relief provided herein beyond that date. On and after April 10, 2013, all swap counterparties –

14 With respect to Part 43, see note 3, supra at 1228; with respect to Part 45, see note 4, supra at 2197; and with
respect to Part 46, see note 5, supra at 35226.

Page 5

including entities that anticipate falling within the definition of a swap dealer, but have not yet
fallen within such definition – must be in full compliance with all of their reporting obligations
under the swap data reporting rules.

Thus, for example, any entity whose swap dealing activities exceeded either of the notional
thresholds during the month of October, 2012, will be required to begin reporting swap
transaction data for the interest rate swaps and credit swaps to which it is a counterparty,
pursuant to Part 43 and Part 45, by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on December 31, 2012 – the swap
dealer registration deadline for that entity – regardless of whether such entity applied to register
as a swap dealer prior to December 31, 2012. Such entity will be required to report historical
swaps data for the interest rate swaps and credit swaps to which it is (or was) a counterparty,
pursuant to Part 46, by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on January 30, 2013 – the date that is 30 days
after the date (as extended by the no-action relief provided herein) on which the entity was
required to begin reporting data for interest rate swaps and credit swaps pursuant to Part 43 and
Part 45. Any interest rate swap or credit swap entered into by such entity after 12:01 a.m.
eastern time on December 31, 2012 would be reportable pursuant to Part 43 and Part 45, and
would not be reportable as a historical swap pursuant to Part 46
n relief provided herein) on which the entity was
required to begin reporting data for interest rate swaps and credit swaps pursuant to Part 43 and
Part 45. Any interest rate swap or credit swap entered into by such entity after 12:01 a.m.
eastern time on December 31, 2012 would be reportable pursuant to Part 43 and Part 45, and
would not be reportable as a historical swap pursuant to Part 46.

Reporting obligations under the swap data reporting rules with respect to equity swaps, foreign
exchange swaps and other commodity swaps are not yet in effect; pursuant to the compliance
timeline set forth in the swap data reporting rules, such reporting obligations come into effect for
swap dealers on January 10, 2013.15 For purposes of Part 43 and Part 45, the no-action position
taken herein does not affect this compliance date. Any entity whose swap dealing activities
exceeded either of the notional thresholds during the month of October, 2012, will be required to
begin reporting swap transaction data for the equity swaps, foreign exchange swaps and other
commodity swaps to which it is a counterparty, pursuant to Part 43 and Part 45, by 12:01 a.m.
eastern time on January 10, 2013. Such entity will be required to report historical swaps data for
the equity swaps, foreign exchange swaps and other commodity swaps to which it is (or was) a
counterparty, pursuant to Part 46, by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on February 9, 2013. Any equity
swap, foreign exchange swap or other commodity swap entered into by such entity after 12:01
a.m. eastern time on January 10, 2013 would be reportable pursuant to Part 43 and Part 45, and
would not be reportable as a historical swap pursuant to Part 46.

As further examples, any entity whose swap dealing activities exceed either of the notional
thresholds during the month of November, 2012, will be required to begin reporting swap
transaction data for all categories of swaps to which it is a counterparty, pursuant to Part 43 and
Part 45, by 12:01 a.m
art 43 and Part 45, and
would not be reportable as a historical swap pursuant to Part 46.

As further examples, any entity whose swap dealing activities exceed either of the notional
thresholds during the month of November, 2012, will be required to begin reporting swap
transaction data for all categories of swaps to which it is a counterparty, pursuant to Part 43 and
Part 45, by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on January 31, 2013, and will be required to report historical
swaps data for all categories of swaps to which it is (or was) a counterparty, pursuant to Part 46,
by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on March 2, 2013. Any entity whose swap dealing activities exceed
either of the notional thresholds during the month of January, 2013, will be required to begin
reporting swap transaction data for all categories of swaps to which it is a counterparty, pursuant

15 Id.

Page 6

to Part 43 and Part 45, by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on March 31, 2013. Since the no-action relief
provided herein ends in all respects at 12:01 a.m. eastern time on April 10, 2013, such entity will
be required to report historical swaps data for all categories of swaps to which it is (or was) a
counterparty, pursuant to Part 46, by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on April 10, 2013. Any entity
whose swap dealing activities exceed either of the notional thresholds during the month of
February, 2013, will be required to begin reporting swap transaction data for all categories of
swaps to which is a counterparty, pursuant to Part 43 and Part 45, and will also be required to
report historical swaps data for all categories of swaps to which it is (or was) a counterparty,
pursuant to Part 46, by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on April 10, 2013.

This letter, and the no-action position taken herein, represent the views of DSIO and DMO only,
and do not necessarily represent the position or views of the Commission or of any other division
or office of the Commission’s staff
report historical swaps data for all categories of swaps to which it is (or was) a counterparty,
pursuant to Part 46, by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on April 10, 2013.

This letter, and the no-action position taken herein, represent the views of DSIO and DMO only,
and do not necessarily represent the position or views of the Commission or of any other division
or office of the Commission’s staff. The no-action position taken herein does not excuse
affected persons from compliance with any other applicable requirements of the CEA or the
regulations thereunder. As with all no-action letters, DSIO and DMO retain the authority to
condition further, modify, suspend, terminate or otherwise restrict the terms of the no-action
relief provided herein, in their discretion.
If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please contact Ward Griffin,
Associate Chief Counsel, DSIO, at (202) 418-5425, or Nora Flood, Attorney Advisor, DMO, at
(202) 418-5354.

Very truly yours,

Gary Barnett

Rick Shilts
Director, DSIO

Acting Director, DMO

## Nearby sections

- [CFTC Letter No. 08-03 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of Eight Futures Contracts Based on Security Indices Derived from the Dow Jones STOXX 600 Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_03.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-05 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the RDXxt USD-RDX Extended Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_05.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-11 Euronext Paris SAs request for no-action relief in connection with the offer and sale in the United States of its futures contracts based on the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Europe Index and the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Euro Zone Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_11.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-13 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contracts Based on the SLI Swiss Leader Index, the Swiss Market Index Midcap, the Dow Jones Eur...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_13.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-15 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight granted exemptive relief from certain of the Part 4 regulations to the registered CPO of a commodity pool, whose shares the CPO intended to publicly offer and to lis...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_15.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-17 DCIO received a request for guidance from the Joint Audit Committee concerning FCM regulatory reporting requirements for investments in a money market mutual fund. The fund had announced that its net asset value per s...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_17.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-18 The Division of Market Oversight issued a letter granting no-action relief to permit the Brazilian Derivatives Exchange, BM&F Bovespa S.A. – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros (BM&F), to make its electronic tradi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_18.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-19 Thailand Futures Exchange Pcls Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the SET50 Index Futures Contract.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_19.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-21 The Division of Market Oversight issued a no-action letter to BNP Paribas confirming that the Division will not recommend that the Commission initiate enforcement action against BNP Paribas or Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., o...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_21.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-02 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partner of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_02.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-06 The CPO of a commodity pool requested that DCIO agree to accept the Annual Report for the period from January 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008 as the Pool’s final annual report despite the fact that the Pool had not f...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_06.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-07 The CPO of a commodity pool with a de minimus amount of its assets embroiled in a bankruptcy requested relief from the ongoing reporting requirements under Part 4. The CPO filed an Annual Report for the Pool for the 2...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_07.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-11 The CPO of two commodity pools requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_11.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-13 The CPO of commodity pool requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_13.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L12_32. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.