# CFTC Letter No. 11-01: The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partners of two commodity pools from registering as CPOs under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an a.. > Federal · Agency guidance · In force URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L11_01 ## Section - **Citation:** CFTC Letter No. 11-01 - **Heading:** The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partners of two commodity pools from registering as CPOs under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an a.. - **Jurisdiction:** Federal - **Kind:** Agency guidance - **Status:** In force - **Text as of:** August 14, 2026 - **Source:** Compiled text - **Location:** CFTC Staff Letters (2008-present) / The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partners of two commodity pools from registering as CPOs under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an a... ## Text Summary: The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partners of two commodity pools from registering as CPOs under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affiliated, registered CPO (“designee”) to serve as the CPO of the pools instead, where, among other things: (1) the general partners and the designee are under common ownership and control; (2) the general partners have delegated all of their management authority to the designee; (3) the general partners do not engage in the solicitation of investors for the pool and do not manage property of the pool; and (4) each general partner and the designee executed and submitted to the Division a written acknowledgement of joint and several liability for any violation by either of them of the Act or the Commission’s regulations in connection with the operation of their respective pools. U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 Telephone: (202) 418-5430 Facsimile: (202) 418-5547 aradhakrishnan@cftc.gov Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight Ananda Radhakrishnan Director CFTC Letter No. 11-01 No-Action March 22, 2011 Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight Re: Section 4m(1) – Request for CPO Registration Relief for Affiliated General Partners of Several Commodity Pools Dear : This is in response to your letter dated January 10, 2011 to the Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight (the “Division”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), as supplemented by a telephone conversation between you and Division staff on January 27, 2011, an email from you on February 23, 2011, and a telephone conversation with your associate, “A”, on February 25, 2011 (collectively, the “correspondence”) ry 10, 2011 to the Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight (the “Division”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”), as supplemented by a telephone conversation between you and Division staff on January 27, 2011, an email from you on February 23, 2011, and a telephone conversation with your associate, “A”, on February 25, 2011 (collectively, the “correspondence”). By the correspondence, you seek relief from the requirement to register with the Commission as a commodity pool operator (“CPO”) under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”)1 on behalf of: (i) “B”, in connection with serving as the general partner of “C”; and (ii) “D”, in connection with serving as the general partner of “E”, such that “F” may serve as the CPO of each of the “C” and “E”. Based upon representations made in the correspondence, we understand the relevant facts to be as follows. “F” is registered as a CPO with the Commission. “F” has entered into certain arrangements with “B” and “D” in order to achieve more favorable tax treatment through the allocation of performance fees to “B” and “D”.2 In support of your request you represent that: 1 7 U.S.C. §1 et seq. The Act can be accessed through the Commission’s website at www.cftc.gov. 2 The Division takes no position, however, regarding the advisability or legality of this conclusion under federal or state law, or regulations issued by the Department of the Treasury. .2 In support of your request you represent that: 1 7 U.S.C. §1 et seq. The Act can be accessed through the Commission’s website at www.cftc.gov. 2 The Division takes no position, however, regarding the advisability or legality of this conclusion under federal or state law, or regulations issued by the Department of the Treasury. Page 2 1. “B” and “D” are not subject to statutory disqualification under Section 8a(2) or 8a(3) of the Act. 2. “F”, “B”, and “D” are under common ownership and control.3 3. Pursuant to the “C’s” investment management agreement with “F”, the investment management functions and investment discretion with respect to the “C” have been delegated to “F”. In addition, the “C’s” general partner, “B”, does not engage in the solicitation of investors for the “C” or manage any of the “C’s” property. 4. Pursuant to the “E’s” investment management agreement with “F”, the investment management functions and investment discretion with respect to the “E” have been delegated to “F”. In addition, the “E’s” general partner, “D”, does not engage in the solicitation of investors for the “E” or manage any of the “E’s” property. 5. All books and records of the “C” and the “E” are maintained at the offices of “F”. 6. “B” and “D” have no employees or other persons acting on their respective behalf, and do not perform any functions or provide any services that are subject to the Act or Commission’s regulations. In further support of this request “B” and “D” have each entered into an acknowledgement with “F” to be jointly and severally liable for any violation of the Act or Commission’s regulations, to the extent that such violation is applicable to activities as CPOs in connection with the operation of “B” and “D’s” respective funds services that are subject to the Act or Commission’s regulations. In further support of this request “B” and “D” have each entered into an acknowledgement with “F” to be jointly and severally liable for any violation of the Act or Commission’s regulations, to the extent that such violation is applicable to activities as CPOs in connection with the operation of “B” and “D’s” respective funds. Based upon the foregoing, and consistent with prior practice in this area,4 the Division will not recommend that the Commission commence any enforcement action against “B” or “D” for failure to register as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Act in connection with serving as a general partner of the “C” and “E”, respectively. This position is, however, subject to the conditions that: (1) “F” serves as the CPO of the “C” and “E”; and (2) “F” remains registered as a CPO. The relief issued by this letter does not excuse “B” or “D” from compliance with any other applicable requirements contained in the Act or in the Commission’s regulations issued thereunder. For example, “B” and “D” remain subject to all antifraud provisions of the Act and the Commission’s regulations, as well as the reporting requirements for traders set forth in Parts 3 “G”, directly or indirectly, owns 100% of the general partners of “F”, “B”, and “D”. 4 See, e.g., CFTC Staff Letter 10-33 [Current Transfer Binder] Comm. Fut. L. Rep. ¶31,523 (Sep. 21, 2010). under. For example, “B” and “D” remain subject to all antifraud provisions of the Act and the Commission’s regulations, as well as the reporting requirements for traders set forth in Parts 3 “G”, directly or indirectly, owns 100% of the general partners of “F”, “B”, and “D”. 4 See, e.g., CFTC Staff Letter 10-33 [Current Transfer Binder] Comm. Fut. L. Rep. ¶31,523 (Sep. 21, 2010). Page 3 15, 18 and 19 of the Commission’s regulations, and all applicable provisions of Part 4, including Regulations 4.20 and 4.41.5 This letter, and the position taken herein, are based upon the representations made to us and are subject to compliance with the conditions stated above. Any different, changed or omitted material facts or circumstances might render this letter void. In this regard, you must notify the Division immediately in the event that the operations or activities of “F”, “B”, “D”, the “C”, or the “E” change in any material respect from those as represented to us. Further, this letter and the position taken herein represent the view of this Division only, and do not necessarily represent the position or view of the Commission or of any other office or division of the Commission. If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please contact Zachary J. King, an attorney on my staff, at (202) 418-5364. Very truly yours, Ananda Radhakrishnan Director 5 Commission Regulations may similarly be found at www.cftc.gov. ## Nearby sections - [CFTC Letter No. 08-03 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of Eight Futures Contracts Based on Security Indices Derived from the Dow Jones STOXX 600 Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_03.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-05 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the RDXxt USD-RDX Extended Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_05.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-11 Euronext Paris SAs request for no-action relief in connection with the offer and sale in the United States of its futures contracts based on the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Europe Index and the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Euro Zone Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_11.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-13 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contracts Based on the SLI Swiss Leader Index, the Swiss Market Index Midcap, the Dow Jones Eur...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_13.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-15 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight granted exemptive relief from certain of the Part 4 regulations to the registered CPO of a commodity pool, whose shares the CPO intended to publicly offer and to lis...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_15.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-17 DCIO received a request for guidance from the Joint Audit Committee concerning FCM regulatory reporting requirements for investments in a money market mutual fund. The fund had announced that its net asset value per s...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_17.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-18 The Division of Market Oversight issued a letter granting no-action relief to permit the Brazilian Derivatives Exchange, BM&F Bovespa S.A. – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros (BM&F), to make its electronic tradi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_18.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-19 Thailand Futures Exchange Pcls Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the SET50 Index Futures Contract.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_19.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-21 The Division of Market Oversight issued a no-action letter to BNP Paribas confirming that the Division will not recommend that the Commission initiate enforcement action against BNP Paribas or Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., o...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_21.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-02 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partner of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_02.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-06 The CPO of a commodity pool requested that DCIO agree to accept the Annual Report for the period from January 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008 as the Pool’s final annual report despite the fact that the Pool had not f...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_06.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-07 The CPO of a commodity pool with a de minimus amount of its assets embroiled in a bankruptcy requested relief from the ongoing reporting requirements under Part 4. The CPO filed an Annual Report for the Pool for the 2...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_07.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-11 The CPO of two commodity pools requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_11.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-13 The CPO of commodity pool requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_13.md) --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L11_01. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.