# CFTC Letter No. 09-47: Tokyo Stock Exchange’s Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Mini Futures Contract Based on the TOPIX and its Futures Contracts Based on the TOPIX Core30 Index..

> Federal · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_47

## Section

- **Citation:** CFTC Letter No. 09-47
- **Heading:** Tokyo Stock Exchange’s Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Mini Futures Contract Based on the TOPIX and its Futures Contracts Based on the TOPIX Core30 Index..
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** CFTC Staff Letters (2008-present) / Tokyo Stock Exchange’s Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Mini Futures Contract Based on the TOPIX and its Futures Contracts Based on the TOPIX Core30 Index...

## Text

Summary: Tokyo Stock Exchange’s Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Mini Futures Contract Based on the TOPIX and its Futures Contracts Based on the TOPIX Core30 Index and TSE REIT Index.

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5120
Facsimile: (202) 418-5524

Office of General Counsel

CFTC Letter No. 09-47
No-Action
November 9, 2009
Office of General Counsel

Kenneth M. Raisler, Esq.
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004-2498

Re:
Tokyo Stock Exchange’s Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the
Offer and Sale in the United States of its Mini Futures Contract Based on the
TOPIX and its Futures Contracts Based on the TOPIX Core30 Index and TSE
REIT Index

Dear Mr. Raisler:

This is in response to your letters, attachments, facsimiles and electronic mail dated from
December 10, 2007 to January 14, 2009, requesting on behalf of the Tokyo Stock Exchange
(“TSE”), that the Office of General Counsel (“Office”) of the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (“Commission” or "CFTC") issue a “no-action” letter concerning the offer and sale
in the United States of TSE’s mini futures contract based on the Tokyo Stock Price Index
(“TOPIX”) and its futures contracts based on the TOPIX Core30 Index (“TOPIX Core30”) and
the TSE REIT Index (“TSE REIT”).

We understand the facts to be as follows. The TSE is a licensed stock exchange under
Japanese law and is authorized to trade stocks, bonds, fixed income derivative products, and
various other types of derivative products, including equity derivative products.1 Pursuant to a
reorganization that became effective on November 1, 2007, TSE Regulation, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of TSE Group, Inc
We understand the facts to be as follows. The TSE is a licensed stock exchange under
Japanese law and is authorized to trade stocks, bonds, fixed income derivative products, and
various other types of derivative products, including equity derivative products.1 Pursuant to a
reorganization that became effective on November 1, 2007, TSE Regulation, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of TSE Group, Inc. and an affiliate of TSE, acts as the self-regulatory organization
with respect to all of TSE’s markets and products, acting in part through TSE Regulation’s

1 This Office previously issued no-action relief to the TSE with respect to its standard-sized
contract on the TOPIX, see CFTC Staff Letter. No. 92-2 [1990-1992 Transfer Binder] Comm.
Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 25,210 (Jan. 16, 1992), and with respect to its futures contract on the
S&P/TOPIX 150 Index, see CFTC Staff Letter No. 01-45 [2000-2002 Transfer Binder] Comm.
Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 28,555 (May 23, 2001).

Market Surveillance Department, which monitors and investigates trading on the TSE and assists
in bringing actions against those found to have violated applicable rules.2

The TSE is operated pursuant to, and is governed by, the Japanese Securities and
Exchange Law and is regulated by the Japanese Financial Services Agency (“FSA”). Pursuant to
changes in law that were approved by the Japanese Diet and that became effective on September
30, 2007, the Securities and Exchange Law has been replaced by the Financial Instruments and
Exchange Law, a more comprehensive statute that, among other things, expands the regulatory
scope of the law and the jurisdiction of the FSA to cover a broader range of markets and products
and expands the prohibitions and penalties for various types of trading abuses, including
manipulation
September
30, 2007, the Securities and Exchange Law has been replaced by the Financial Instruments and
Exchange Law, a more comprehensive statute that, among other things, expands the regulatory
scope of the law and the jurisdiction of the FSA to cover a broader range of markets and products
and expands the prohibitions and penalties for various types of trading abuses, including
manipulation. Under both prior law and the new statutory changes, the FSA possesses broad
supervisory responsibility for all aspects of financial services, including inspection, supervision,
and surveillance of financial activities.3

The TOPIX is a broad-based, free-float-adjusted-market-capitalization-weighted index of
all the common stocks and Real Estate Investment Trusts (“REITs”) included in the First Section
of the TSE. The TOPIX Core30 is a broad-based, free-float-adjusted-market-capitalization-
weighted index composed of 30 of the largest companies included in the TOPIX. The TSE REIT
is a broad-based, free-float-adjusted-market-capitalization-weighted index comprised of the
equity securities of all REITs listed on the TSE.4 All of the indices are managed, calculated and
published by the TSE.5 Based on data supplied by TSE, the total adjusted market capitalization

2 See letter from Kenneth M. Raisler, Esq., Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, to Terry S. Arbit, General
Counsel, CFTC, dated June 10, 2008, at 2.
3 Id.

4 REITs are pools of investment capital gathered by investment corporations or fund managers
and invested in real estate property. In November 2000, the Japanese Investment Trust and
Investment Corporation Law was amended to include real estate under the types of capital
allowed for use by investment trusts, which facilitated the development and listing of REITs. In
March 2001, TSE created listing rules for REITs to be traded on its market and the first REITs
began trading on the TSE in September 2001. Id. at 5
operty. In November 2000, the Japanese Investment Trust and
Investment Corporation Law was amended to include real estate under the types of capital
allowed for use by investment trusts, which facilitated the development and listing of REITs. In
March 2001, TSE created listing rules for REITs to be traded on its market and the first REITs
began trading on the TSE in September 2001. Id. at 5.

5 The TOPIX is not subject to periodic reviews. It always contains the stocks included in the
First Section of the TSE, which includes the stocks of the largest and most well-capitalized
companies listed and traded on the TSE. Thus, the constituent makeup of the TOPIX changes
when stocks are listed and delisted on the TSE First Section. Similarly, the TSE REIT is not
subject to periodic reviews; it always contains the REITs listed for trading on TSE. For both the
TOPIX and TSE REIT, adjustments are made to the base market value of the relevant index to
maintain index continuity. The TOPIX Core30 is subject to biannual reviews in January and
July, with possible additions and deletions considered in January and additions only considered
in July. Announcements of constituent changes are published on the first business day of
January or July and are effective one business day before the last business day of the relevant
month. At each January review, the TSE first determines the top 90 stocks in the First Section
by total trading value during the previous three-year period and ranks those stocks by free-float
market capitalization. The 15 largest stocks on that list of 90 stocks are selected for inclusion.
The remaining 15 component stocks are the 15 largest stocks that are on the list of 90 stocks and

2
month. At each January review, the TSE first determines the top 90 stocks in the First Section
by total trading value during the previous three-year period and ranks those stocks by free-float
market capitalization. The 15 largest stocks on that list of 90 stocks are selected for inclusion.
The remaining 15 component stocks are the 15 largest stocks that are on the list of 90 stocks and

2

of the securities in the TOPIX was approximately US$ 2.39 trillion, in the TOPIX Core30 was
approximately US$ 897.67 billion, and in the TSE REIT was approximately US $36.03 billion as
of March 17, 2008.6 The largest single security by weight represented 4.38%, and the five
largest securities by weight represented 12.83%, of the TOPIX.7 The largest single security by
weight represented 11.65%, and the five largest securities represented 34.16%, of the TOPIX
Core30.8 The largest single security by weight represented 16.15%, and the five largest
securities represented 43.45% of the TSE REIT.9 The securities comprising the lowest 25% of
the TOPIX and TOPIX Core30 had aggregate values of average daily trading volume in excess
of US$ 30 million: about US$ 8.76 billion and US$ 2.71 billion, respectively, over the six-
month period ending February 29, 2008.10 The securities comprising the lowest 25% of the TSE
REIT had an aggregate value of average daily trading volume of about US$ 47 million for the
six-month period ending October 31, 2008.11 All three indices are calculated in real time and
disseminated by electronic means through major data vendors.12

that are current TOPIX Core30 constituents
lume of about US$ 47 million for the
six-month period ending October 31, 2008.11 All three indices are calculated in real time and
disseminated by electronic means through major data vendors.12

that are current TOPIX Core30 constituents. Those stocks must be ranked within the top 40
stocks by adjusted free-float market capitalization on the “base date,” which is the third Friday of
the previous December for the January review and the third Friday of the previous June for the
July review. If 30 stocks do not meet these criteria, then the additional stocks are selected from
the list of 90 stocks by trading value until the TOPIX Core30 has 30 stocks. See Tokyo Stock
Exchange Index Guidebook (February 2008 version). Additions and deletions may occur to the
TOPIX Core 30 outside the periodic review due to certain events including delistings, mergers
and spin-offs. Id. Changes to the TOPIX, the TSE REIT and TOPIX Core30 methodologies
must be approved by TSE’s Committee of Executive Officers. The Committee members, as well
as all other TSE personnel who have access to index information, are subject to the TSE's
internal guidelines, which prohibit disclosure of the information and prohibit trading by officers
or employees in TSE futures contracts or the underlying securities. See electronic mail from
David Gilberg, Esq., Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, to Julian E. Hammar, Assistant General
Counsel, CFTC, dated May 26, 2008.

6 See letter from Mr. Raisler to Mr. Arbit, dated June 10, 2008, at Appendix A.

7 Id. at 3 and Appendix A.

8 Id. at 4 and Appendix A.

9 Id. at 5 and Appendix A.

10 Id. at 3-4 and Appendix A.

11 See electronic mail from David Gilberg, Esq., Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, to Julian E.
Hammar, Assistant General Counsel, CFTC, dated November 25, 2008.

12 See letter from Mr. Raisler to Mr
6 See letter from Mr. Raisler to Mr. Arbit, dated June 10, 2008, at Appendix A.

7 Id. at 3 and Appendix A.

8 Id. at 4 and Appendix A.

9 Id. at 5 and Appendix A.

10 Id. at 3-4 and Appendix A.

11 See electronic mail from David Gilberg, Esq., Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, to Julian E.
Hammar, Assistant General Counsel, CFTC, dated November 25, 2008.

12 See letter from Mr. Raisler to Mr. Arbit, dated June 10, 2008, at 3, and Tokyo Stock Exchange
Index Guidebook, at 24 (February 2008 version).

3

TSE’s mini futures contract on the TOPIX and its futures contracts on the TOPIX Core30
and TSE REIT provide for cash settlement. For all three contracts, prices are quoted in index
points with each index point equal to 1,000 Japanese yen per contract. The minimum price
fluctuation is 0.25 index point for the mini futures contract on the TOPIX and 0.5 index point for
the futures contracts on the TOPIX Core30 and TSE REIT. TSE currently lists for trading the
nearest three months of the March quarterly cycle. The last trading day for the contracts is the
last business day prior to the second Friday of the contract month. The final settlement price for
each contract is based on a special opening quotation for the relevant index using the opening
prices of the constituent stocks (or REIT shares in the case of the TSE REIT) on the second
business day following the last trading day.13

The Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”),14 as amended by the Commodity Futures
Modernization Act of 2000 (“CFMA”),15 provides that the offer or sale in the U.S
or
each contract is based on a special opening quotation for the relevant index using the opening
prices of the constituent stocks (or REIT shares in the case of the TSE REIT) on the second
business day following the last trading day.13

The Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”),14 as amended by the Commodity Futures
Modernization Act of 2000 (“CFMA”),15 provides that the offer or sale in the U.S. of futures
contracts based on a group or index of securities, including those contracts traded on or subject
to the rules of a foreign board of trade, is subject to the Commission's exclusive jurisdiction,16
with the exception of security futures products,17 over which the Commission shares jurisdiction
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).18 Thus, the Commission’s jurisdiction
remains exclusive with regard to a futures contract on a group or index of securities that is broad-
based pursuant to CEA Section 1a(25).19

CEA Section 2(a)(1)(C)(iv) generally prohibits any person from offering or selling a
futures contract based on a security index in the U.S., except as permitted under CEA Section
2(a)(1)(C)(ii) or CEA Section 2(a)(1)(D).20 By its terms, CEA Section 2(a)(1)(C)(iv) applies to
futures contracts on security indices traded on both domestic and foreign boards of trade. CEA
Section 2(a)(1)(C)(ii) sets forth three criteria to govern the trading of futures contracts on a group

13 Id. at 3-5 and Appendix B (Contract Specifications).

14 7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.

15 Appendix E of Pub. L. No. 106-554, 114 Stat. 2763 (2000).

16 See CEA Section 2(a)(1)(C)(ii).

17 A security futures product is defined as a security future or any put, call, straddle, option, or
privilege on any security future. See CEA Section 1a(32)
13 Id. at 3-5 and Appendix B (Contract Specifications).

14 7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.

15 Appendix E of Pub. L. No. 106-554, 114 Stat. 2763 (2000).

16 See CEA Section 2(a)(1)(C)(ii).

17 A security futures product is defined as a security future or any put, call, straddle, option, or
privilege on any security future. See CEA Section 1a(32). A security future is defined as a
contract of sale for future delivery of a single security or of a narrow-based security index,
including any interest therein or based on the value thereof, with certain exceptions. See CEA
Section 1a(31).

18 See CEA Section 2(a)(1)(D).

19 See CEA Section 2(a)(1)(C)(ii).

20 CEA Section 2(a)(1)(D) governs the offer and sale of security futures products.

4

or index of securities on designated contract markets and registered derivatives transaction
execution facilities (“DTEFs”):

(1)
the contract must provide for cash settlement;

(2)
the contract must not be readily susceptible to manipulation nor to being used to
manipulate any underlying security; and

(3)
the group or index of securities must not constitute a narrow-based security
index.21

While Section 2(a)(1)(C)(ii) provides that no contract market or DTEF may trade a
security index futures contract unless it meets the three criteria noted above, it does not explicitly
address the standards to be applied to a foreign security index futures contract traded on a foreign
board of trade. This Office has applied those same three criteria in evaluating requests by
foreign boards of trade to allow the offer and sale within the U.S
tract market or DTEF may trade a
security index futures contract unless it meets the three criteria noted above, it does not explicitly
address the standards to be applied to a foreign security index futures contract traded on a foreign
board of trade. This Office has applied those same three criteria in evaluating requests by
foreign boards of trade to allow the offer and sale within the U.S. of their foreign security index
futures contracts when those foreign boards of trade do not seek designation as a contract market
or registration as a DTEF to trade those products.22

Accordingly, Commission staff has examined the TOPIX and TSE’s mini futures contract
based thereon, and the TOPIX Core30, TSE REIT and TSE’s futures contracts based thereon, to
determine whether the TOPIX, the TOPIX Core30, the TSE REIT and the TSE’s respective

21 The first two criteria under CEA Section 2(a)(1)(C)(ii) were unchanged by the CFMA. With
regard to the third criterion, an index is a “narrow-based security index” under both the CEA and
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., if it has any one
of the following four characteristics: (1) it has nine or fewer component securities; (2) any one
of its component securities comprises more than 30% of its weighting; (3) the five highest
weighted component securities in the aggregate comprise more than 60% of the index’s
weighting; or (4) the lowest weighted component securities comprising, in the aggregate, 25% of
the index’s weighting, have an aggregate dollar value of average daily trading volume of less
than $50 million (or in the case of an index with 15 or more component securities, $30 million).
See CEA Section 1a(25)(A)(i)-(iv); Exchange Act Section 3(a)(55)(B)(i)-(iv). Thus, an index
that does not have any of these elements is not a narrow-based security index for purposes of
CEA Section 2(a)(1)(C)(ii)
’s weighting, have an aggregate dollar value of average daily trading volume of less
than $50 million (or in the case of an index with 15 or more component securities, $30 million).
See CEA Section 1a(25)(A)(i)-(iv); Exchange Act Section 3(a)(55)(B)(i)-(iv). Thus, an index
that does not have any of these elements is not a narrow-based security index for purposes of
CEA Section 2(a)(1)(C)(ii). See also CEA Section 1a(25)(B); Exchange Act Section
3(a)(55)(C).

22 With regard to the third criterion, the CFTC and SEC jointly promulgated Rule 41.13 under
the CEA and Rule 3a55-3 under the Exchange Act, governing security index futures contracts
traded on foreign boards of trade. These rules provide that “[w]hen a contract of sale for future
delivery on a security index is traded on or subject to the rules of a foreign board of trade, such
index shall not be a narrow-based security index if it would not be a narrow-based security index
if a futures contract on such index were traded on a designated contract market or registered
derivatives transaction execution facility.” CFTC Rule 41.13, 17 C.F.R. § 41.13; Exchange Act
Rule 3a55-3, 17 C.F.R. § 240.3a55-3.

5

futures contracts meet the requirements enumerated in CEA Section 2(a)(1)(C)(ii). Based on the
information noted herein and as set forth in the letter, attachments, facsimiles and electronic mail
cited above, we have determined that the TOPIX and TSE’s mini futures contract based thereon,
and the TOPIX Core30, TSE REIT and TSE’s respective futures contracts based thereon,
conform to these requirements.23

In determining whether a foreign futures contract based on a foreign security index is not
readily susceptible to manipulation or being used to manipulate any underlying security, one
preliminary consideration is the requesting exchange’s ability to access information regarding
the securities underlying the index
respective futures contracts based thereon,
conform to these requirements.23

In determining whether a foreign futures contract based on a foreign security index is not
readily susceptible to manipulation or being used to manipulate any underlying security, one
preliminary consideration is the requesting exchange’s ability to access information regarding
the securities underlying the index. As noted above, all of the securities underlying the TOPIX,
the TOPIX Core30 and the TSE REIT are traded on the TSE. Accordingly, TSE should have
access to information with respect to the securities underlying the TOPIX, TOPIX Core30 and
TSE REIT necessary to detect and deter manipulation. In the event that TSE is unable to obtain
access to adequate surveillance data in this regard, or is unable to share such data with the CFTC,
this Office reserves the right to reconsider the position we have taken herein.24

In light of the foregoing, this Office will not recommend enforcement action to the
Commission based on Sections 2(a)(1)(C)(iv), 4(a), or 12(e) of the CEA, as amended, if TSE’s
mini futures contract based on the TOPIX and its futures contracts based on the TOPIX Core30
and TSE REIT are offered or sold in the U.S. Because this position is based upon facts and
representations contained in the letters, attachments, facsimiles and electronic mail cited above,
it should be noted that any different, omitted or changed facts or conditions might require a
different conclusion. This position also is contingent on the continued compliance by TSE with
all regulatory requirements imposed by the FSA, and the applicable laws and regulations of
Japan. In addition, this position may be affected by any rules that the Commission may adopt
regarding futures contracts based on non-narrow-based security indices
changed facts or conditions might require a
different conclusion. This position also is contingent on the continued compliance by TSE with
all regulatory requirements imposed by the FSA, and the applicable laws and regulations of
Japan. In addition, this position may be affected by any rules that the Commission may adopt
regarding futures contracts based on non-narrow-based security indices.

23 In making this determination, Commission staff has concluded that the TOPIX, the TOPIX
Core30 and the TSE REIT do not have any of the elements of a narrow-based security index as
enumerated in CEA Section 1a(25)(A). Accordingly, the TOPIX, the TOPIX Core30 and the
TSE REIT would not be narrow-based security indices if traded on a designated contract market
or DTEF.

24 TSE represents that it is able to obtain and provide any necessary information regarding the
TOPIX, the TOPIX Core30, the TSE REIT, their underlying securities, and TSE’s respective
futures contracts based thereon, and undertakes to cooperate with Commission requests for
information. See letter from Mr. Raisler to Mr. Arbit, dated June 10, 2008 (attachment). TSE is
an affiliate member of the Intermarket Surveillance Group (“ISG”), which consists of
representatives from securities and futures exchanges in the U.S. and other countries. The
members of ISG have agreed to share information to ensure coordinated surveillance of
intermarket trading abuses. TSE also is a signatory to the International Information Sharing
Memorandum of Understanding signed on March 15, 1996, at Boca Raton, Florida. Id. In
addition, TSE’s regulator, the FSA, signed a Statement of Intent Concerning Cooperation,
Consultation and the Exchange of Information (“SOI”) with the Commission and the Securities
and Exchange Commission, on May 17, 2002 (as amended January 2006).

6
is a signatory to the International Information Sharing
Memorandum of Understanding signed on March 15, 1996, at Boca Raton, Florida. Id. In
addition, TSE’s regulator, the FSA, signed a Statement of Intent Concerning Cooperation,
Consultation and the Exchange of Information (“SOI”) with the Commission and the Securities
and Exchange Commission, on May 17, 2002 (as amended January 2006).

6

7

The offer and sale in the U.S. of TSE’s mini futures contract on the TOPIX and its
futures contracts on the TOPIX Core30 and TSE REIT is, of course, subject to Part 30 of the
Commission’s regulations, which governs the offer and sale of foreign futures and foreign option
contracts in the U.S.25

Sincerely,

Dan M. Berkovitz

General Counsel

25 See 17 C.F.R. Part 30.

## Nearby sections

- [CFTC Letter No. 08-03 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of Eight Futures Contracts Based on Security Indices Derived from the Dow Jones STOXX 600 Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_03.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-05 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the RDXxt USD-RDX Extended Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_05.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-11 Euronext Paris SAs request for no-action relief in connection with the offer and sale in the United States of its futures contracts based on the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Europe Index and the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Euro Zone Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_11.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-13 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contracts Based on the SLI Swiss Leader Index, the Swiss Market Index Midcap, the Dow Jones Eur...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_13.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-15 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight granted exemptive relief from certain of the Part 4 regulations to the registered CPO of a commodity pool, whose shares the CPO intended to publicly offer and to lis...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_15.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-17 DCIO received a request for guidance from the Joint Audit Committee concerning FCM regulatory reporting requirements for investments in a money market mutual fund. The fund had announced that its net asset value per s...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_17.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-18 The Division of Market Oversight issued a letter granting no-action relief to permit the Brazilian Derivatives Exchange, BM&F Bovespa S.A. – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros (BM&F), to make its electronic tradi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_18.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-19 Thailand Futures Exchange Pcls Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the SET50 Index Futures Contract.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_19.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 08-21 The Division of Market Oversight issued a no-action letter to BNP Paribas confirming that the Division will not recommend that the Commission initiate enforcement action against BNP Paribas or Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., o...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_21.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-02 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partner of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_02.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-06 The CPO of a commodity pool requested that DCIO agree to accept the Annual Report for the period from January 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008 as the Pool’s final annual report despite the fact that the Pool had not f...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_06.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-07 The CPO of a commodity pool with a de minimus amount of its assets embroiled in a bankruptcy requested relief from the ongoing reporting requirements under Part 4. The CPO filed an Annual Report for the Pool for the 2...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_07.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-11 The CPO of two commodity pools requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_11.md)
- [CFTC Letter No. 09-13 The CPO of commodity pool requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_13.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_47. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.