# CFTC Letter No. 09-46: The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight issued an interpretation that a family partnership is not a commodity pool where all participants are close family members. This interpretation would not be affected.. > Federal · Agency guidance · In force URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_46 ## Section - **Citation:** CFTC Letter No. 09-46 - **Heading:** The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight issued an interpretation that a family partnership is not a commodity pool where all participants are close family members. This interpretation would not be affected.. - **Jurisdiction:** Federal - **Kind:** Agency guidance - **Status:** In force - **Text as of:** August 14, 2026 - **Source:** Compiled text - **Location:** CFTC Staff Letters (2008-present) / The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight issued an interpretation that a family partnership is not a commodity pool where all participants are close family members. This interpretation would not be affected... ## Text Summary: The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight issued an interpretation that a family partnership is not a commodity pool where all participants are close family members. This interpretation would not be affected by family members forming a CTA which will manage both the family partnership’s commodity interest trading and the trading of non-related persons. U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 Telephone: (202) 418-5430 Facsimile: (202) 418-5547 aradhakrishnan@cftc.gov Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight Ananda Radhakrishnan Director CFTC Letter No. 09-46 Interpretation October 20, 2009 Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight Re: Regulation 4.10(d)(1) – Request that a limited partnership comprised of family members not be considered a commodity pool Dear : This is in response to your letter dated September 11, 2009 to the Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight (“Division”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”). By your letter, you request an interpretation that “A” is not a commodity pool within the meaning and intent of Regulation 4.10(d)(1)1 and therefore that the general partners of “A”, you and “B”, your spouse (“General Partners”), are not required to register as commodity pool operators (“CPOs”). Based upon the representations made in your letter, we understand the relevant facts to be as follows. “A” is a family investment partnership that was organized in 1996 to make and hold investments by your immediate family. No persons other than the General Partners have ever held any interest in the partnership. In addition to investments in a variety of other assets, “A” also invests in and trades commodity futures contracts exclusively for its own account relevant facts to be as follows. “A” is a family investment partnership that was organized in 1996 to make and hold investments by your immediate family. No persons other than the General Partners have ever held any interest in the partnership. In addition to investments in a variety of other assets, “A” also invests in and trades commodity futures contracts exclusively for its own account. Neither of the General Partners serves as general partner of any other partnership that trades commodity interests. Recently, “A” has decided to start a commodity trading advisory business and has organized a new company, “C”, to pursue this business activity.2 While “C” is registered with 1 Commission regulations referred to herein are found at 17 C.F.R. Ch. 1 (2009). They can be accessed through the Commission’s website at www.cftc.gov. 2 “C” is owned 98% by “A”, and 2% by the General Partners. The only officers are you and your son. Page 2 the Commission as a commodity trading advisor (“CTA”), it has yet to have any clients other than “A”. In support of a finding that “A” would not be a commodity pool, you state: We do not intend to make any material changes with respect to the proprietary futures trading activity of “A” or the partnership’s family ownership structure. “A” intends to continue trading its futures account only for its own account without any outside funds, will not have any partners other than our immediate family member partners, and will not pay the general partners for serving as general partners and managing the partnership’s assets. Based upon our review of the representations made in your letter, and consistent with the Division’s prior practice in this area,3 we believe that “A” is not a “pool” within the meaning and intent of Regulation 4.10(d)(1) and, consequently, that the General Partners are not CPOs thereof will not pay the general partners for serving as general partners and managing the partnership’s assets. Based upon our review of the representations made in your letter, and consistent with the Division’s prior practice in this area,3 we believe that “A” is not a “pool” within the meaning and intent of Regulation 4.10(d)(1) and, consequently, that the General Partners are not CPOs thereof. This conclusion is not affected by “A” involvement with “C”, because that involvement does not affect “A” own operation. This letter does not excuse the General Partners from compliance with any other applicable requirements contained in the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”)4 or in the Commission’s regulations issued thereunder. For example, the General Partners remain subject to the antifraud provisions of Section 4b of the Act5 and the reporting requirements set forth in Parts 15, 18, and 19 of the Commission’s regulations. Moreover, this letter is applicable to the General Partners solely in connection with their operation of “A”. The views expressed in this letter are based upon the representations that you have made to us and are strictly limited to those representations. Any different, changed or omitted facts or conditions might require us to reach a different conclusion. In this connection, we request that you notify us immediately in the event the operations, activities or ownership of the General Partners, “A”, or “C” change in any way from those as represented to us. Further, the interpretations provided herein represent the positions of this Division only and do not 3 See, e.g., CFTC Interpretive Letter 00-100 [2000-2002 Transfer Binder] Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶28,420 (Nov. 1, 2000) (Virginia limited partnership consisting of immediate family members which invests family assets in commodity futures is not a pool); see also CFTC Interpretive Letter No. 96-24, [1994-1996 Transfer Binder] Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶26,653 (Mar Division only and do not 3 See, e.g., CFTC Interpretive Letter 00-100 [2000-2002 Transfer Binder] Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶28,420 (Nov. 1, 2000) (Virginia limited partnership consisting of immediate family members which invests family assets in commodity futures is not a pool); see also CFTC Interpretive Letter No. 96-24, [1994-1996 Transfer Binder] Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶26,653 (Mar. 4, 1996) (Delaware corporation no longer a pool after all non-family member participants withdrew assets). 4 7 U.S.C. §1 et seq. The Act can similarly be accessed through the Commission’s website. 5 7 U.S.C. §6b. Page 3 necessarily reflect the views of the Commission or any other division or office of the Commission. Page 4 If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please contact Barbara S. Gold, Associate Director of the Division, at (202) 418-5450. Very truly yours, Ananda Radhakrishnan Director ## Nearby sections - [CFTC Letter No. 08-03 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of Eight Futures Contracts Based on Security Indices Derived from the Dow Jones STOXX 600 Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_03.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-05 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the RDXxt USD-RDX Extended Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_05.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-11 Euronext Paris SAs request for no-action relief in connection with the offer and sale in the United States of its futures contracts based on the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Europe Index and the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Euro Zone Index.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_11.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-13 Eurex Deutschlands Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contracts Based on the SLI Swiss Leader Index, the Swiss Market Index Midcap, the Dow Jones Eur...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_13.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-15 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight granted exemptive relief from certain of the Part 4 regulations to the registered CPO of a commodity pool, whose shares the CPO intended to publicly offer and to lis...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_15.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-17 DCIO received a request for guidance from the Joint Audit Committee concerning FCM regulatory reporting requirements for investments in a money market mutual fund. The fund had announced that its net asset value per s...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_17.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-18 The Division of Market Oversight issued a letter granting no-action relief to permit the Brazilian Derivatives Exchange, BM&F Bovespa S.A. – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros (BM&F), to make its electronic tradi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_18.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-19 Thailand Futures Exchange Pcls Request for No-Action Relief in Connection with the Offer and Sale in the United States of its Futures Contract Based on the SET50 Index Futures Contract.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_19.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 08-21 The Division of Market Oversight issued a no-action letter to BNP Paribas confirming that the Division will not recommend that the Commission initiate enforcement action against BNP Paribas or Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., o...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L08_21.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-02 The Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief to the general partner of a commodity pool from registering as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, and allowed an affi...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_02.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-06 The CPO of a commodity pool requested that DCIO agree to accept the Annual Report for the period from January 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008 as the Pool’s final annual report despite the fact that the Pool had not f...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_06.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-07 The CPO of a commodity pool with a de minimus amount of its assets embroiled in a bankruptcy requested relief from the ongoing reporting requirements under Part 4. The CPO filed an Annual Report for the Pool for the 2...](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_07.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-11 The CPO of two commodity pools requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_11.md) - [CFTC Letter No. 09-13 The CPO of commodity pool requested relief to use IFRS in lieu of US GAAP. DCIO granted relief pursuant to Commission Regulations 140.93 and 4.12(a).](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_13.md) --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFTC_L09_46. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.