# 29 C.F.R. § 18.406 (2026): Habit; routine practice

> Federal · Regulations · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P18_S18_406

## Section

- **Citation:** 29 C.F.R. § 18.406 (2026)
- **Heading:** Habit; routine practice
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Regulations
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** Title 29 CFR: Labor / Part 18: RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES / Subpart B: Rules of Evidence / § 18.406: § 18.406   Habit › routine practice.

## Text

Evidence of the habit of a person or of the routine practice of an organization, whether corroborated or not and regardless of the presence of eyewitnesses, is relevant to prove that the conduct of the person or organization on a particular occasion was in conformity with the habit or routine practice.

## Nearby sections

- [29 C.F.R. § 18.101 (2026) § 18.101   Scope.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P18_S18_101.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 18.102 (2026) § 18.102   Purpose and construction.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P18_S18_102.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 18.103 (2026) § 18.103   Rulings on evidence.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P18_S18_103.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 18.104 (2026) § 18.104   Preliminary questions.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P18_S18_104.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 18.105 (2026) § 18.105   Limited admissibility.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P18_S18_105.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 18.106 (2026) § 18.106   Remainder of or related writings or recorded statements.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P18_S18_106.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 18.201 (2026) § 18.201   Official notice of adjudicative facts.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P18_S18_201.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 18.301 (2026) § 18.301   Presumptions in general.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P18_S18_301.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 18.302 (2026) § 18.302   Applicability of state law.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P18_S18_302.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 18.401 (2026) § 18.401   Definition of relevant evidence.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P18_S18_401.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 18.402 (2026) § 18.402   Relevant evidence generally admissible; irrelevant evidence inadmissible.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P18_S18_402.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 18.403 (2026) § 18.403   Exclusion of relevant evidence on grounds of confusion or waste of time.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P18_S18_403.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 18.404 (2026) § 18.404   Character evidence not admissible to prove conduct; exceptions; other crimes.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P18_S18_404.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 18.405 (2026) § 18.405   Methods of proving character.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P18_S18_405.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P18_S18_406. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.