# 29 C.F.R. § 1607.9 (2026): No assumption of validity

> Federal · Regulations · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P1607_S1607_9

## Section

- **Citation:** 29 C.F.R. § 1607.9 (2026)
- **Heading:** No assumption of validity
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Regulations
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** Title 29 CFR: Labor / Chapter XIV: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION / Part 1607: UNIFORM GUIDELINES ON EMPLOYEE SELECTION PROCEDURES (1978) / § 1607.9: § 1607.9   No assumption of validity.

## Text

A.
Unacceptable substitutes for evidence of validity.
Under no circumstances will the general reputation of a test or other selection procedures, its author or its publisher, or casual reports of its validity be accepted in lieu of evidence of validity. Specifically ruled out are: assumptions of validity based on a procedure's name or descriptive labels; all forms of promotional literature; data bearing on the frequency of a procedure's usage; testimonial statements and credentials of sellers, users, or consultants; and other nonempirical or anecdotal accounts of selection practices or selection outcomes.
B.
Encouragement of professional supervision.
Professional supervision of selection activities is encouraged but is not a substitute for documented evidence of validity. The enforcement agencies will take into account the fact that a thorough job analysis was conducted and that careful development and use of a selection procedure in accordance with professional standards enhance the probability that the selection procedure is valid for the job.

## Nearby sections

- [29 C.F.R. § 1607.1 (2026) § 1607.1   Statement of purpose.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P1607_S1607_1.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 1607.2 (2026) § 1607.2   Scope.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P1607_S1607_2.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 1607.3 (2026) § 1607.3   Discrimination defined: Relationship between use of selection procedures and discrimination.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P1607_S1607_3.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 1607.4 (2026) § 1607.4   Information on impact.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P1607_S1607_4.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 1607.5 (2026) § 1607.5   General standards for validity studies.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P1607_S1607_5.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 1607.6 (2026) § 1607.6   Use of selection procedures which have not been validated.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P1607_S1607_6.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 1607.7 (2026) § 1607.7   Use of other validity studies.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P1607_S1607_7.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 1607.8 (2026) § 1607.8   Cooperative studies.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P1607_S1607_8.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 1607.9 (2026) § 1607.9   No assumption of validity.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P1607_S1607_9.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 1607.10 (2026) § 1607.10   Employment agencies and employment services.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P1607_S1607_10.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 1607.11 (2026) § 1607.11   Disparate treatment.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P1607_S1607_11.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 1607.12 (2026) § 1607.12   Retesting of applicants.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P1607_S1607_12.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 1607.13 (2026) § 1607.13   Affirmative action.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P1607_S1607_13.md)
- [29 C.F.R. § 1607.14 (2026) § 1607.14   Technical standards for validity studies.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P1607_S1607_14.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CFR_T29_P1607_S1607_9. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.