# CA Bulletin 1993-04: Assembly Bill 1672

> California · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CA_INS_B_1993-04

## Section

- **Citation:** CA Bulletin 1993-04
- **Heading:** Assembly Bill 1672
- **Jurisdiction:** California
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** California Department of Insurance Bulletins / Assembly Bill 1672

## Text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
SAN FRANCISCO
R11lletin No_ 93-4
June 25, 1993
TO:
ALL INSURERS PROVIDING EMPLOYMENT-RELATED "HEALTH" COVERAGE
SUBJECT:
Assembly Bill No. 1672:
I.
How it Affects All Employment-Related Health Insurance.
II.
Determining Whether a New Plan Entrant Gets Credit for "Time
Served" in a Prior Qualifying Plan.
II.
Changes to the Emergency Regulations (File No. RH-317) pertaining to
the "Small Employer" Provisions of AB1672.
SUMMARY
This Bulletin alerts you to those provisions of Assembly Bill No. 1672 (Chapter 1128 of the
Statutes of 1992) which apply to virtually all employment-related "health" insurance products
issued or in force in this state, regardless of the situs of the policy, effective July 1, 1993. This
Bulletin also provides guidance in interpreting the phrase "any waiting period" in Insurance Code
§§10198. 7(c) and 10708(c). This Bulletin also notifies you of a change in §2233.20, Renewal
Date, in the emergency regulations pertaining to the "small employer" provisions of AB1672.
I.
How AB1672 AFFECTS ALL EMPLOYMENT-RELATED HEALTH INSURANCE.
A. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE NEW LEGISLATION.
AB 1672 adds §§10198.6 through 10198.9 to the California Insurance Code, applicable to
employment-related individual or group health insurance progr::im._ c.ovP-rine three or mru:e.
persons. These provisions apply regardless of whether the employer contributes to the premium.
Insurance Code §§10198.6 through 10198.9:
•
Apply to most types of health insurance "... offered through employment or sponsored
by an employer . . . " providing benefits to California residents ". . . regardless of the
situs of the contract or group master policyholder" (Ins. C. §§10198.6(a) and 10198.8);
These provisions apply regardless of whether the employer contributes to the premium.
Insurance Code §§10198.6 through 10198.9:
•
Apply to most types of health insurance "... offered through employment or sponsored
by an employer . . . " providing benefits to California residents ". . . regardless of the
situs of the contract or group master policyholder" (Ins. C. §§10198.6(a) and 10198.8);

•
Narrowly define what can be excluded as a "pre-existing condition" (Ins. C.
§§10198.6(c) and 10198.?(a));
•
Establish maximum time limits for pre-existing conditions exclusions imposed on newly
eligible persons and on \\'aiting periods imposed on "late enrollees" (Ins. C. §10198.7);
•
Require that insurers credit, toward the satisfaction of pre-existing conditions exclusions
or \\'aiting periods, newly-insured persons with the time that they were covered under
qualifying preceding health benefit plans in specified circumstances (Ins. C.
§10198. 7(c));
•
Prohibit waivers, exclusions or special waiting periods for coverage applicable to specific
persons {Ins. C. §10198.7(a).
Parallel Health and Safety Code provisions in AB1672 apply to Health Care Service Plans.
(Please refer to Bulletin 93-3, of April 15, 1993, and Title 10, California Code of Regulations
§§2233 through 2233.99 for guidance about AB1672 as it applic::s Lu pruuucts l:uvering employers
of from 3 to 50 employees.)
B.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROVISIONS OF AH 1672 WHICH
APPLY 1D EMPLOYMENT-RELATED HEALTH INSURANCE.
The comments below reflect our understanding of the intended operation of AB1672 and are
provided to assist you in your analysis of the law.
These comments assume that the health
hP-nefit plans at issue ARE NOI' subject to the 1'small employer1' provisions of AB1672, except
.as noted.
11Trailer11 legislation is always possible, so you should ensure that you are referring
to a current version of the law.
1
low reflect our understanding of the intended operation of AB1672 and are
provided to assist you in your analysis of the law.
These comments assume that the health
hP-nefit plans at issue ARE NOI' subject to the 1'small employer1' provisions of AB1672, except
.as noted.
11Trailer11 legislation is always possible, so you should ensure that you are referring
to a current version of the law.
1. What size employer plans are subject to AB 1672?
The jurisdicliuual language of the "employment-related'' provisions of AB1672 does not speak
in terms of employer sire. Any health benefit plan that covers three or more persons (not just
employees) and that is offered or provided through employment or is sponsored by an employer
may be subject to the "employment-related" provisions of AB1672.
Note that plans covering employees of employers of between 3 and 50 employees may be subject
to the employment-related provisions of AB1672 even if they are exempt from the "small
employer" provisions of the law - for example, small employer plans which are paid for entirely
by the employees. Ins. C. §§10198.7(a) and (d).
2. Does AB 1672 apply to individual (including selected group or ''franchise") health insurance
policies··offered through emplnyment or sponmred by an employer?
2

Yes, except for noncancellable or guaranteed-renewable policies (as defined in Ins. C. §§10273
and 10273.3t respectively) which were delivered prior to July 1, 1993. Ins. C. §10198.6(a).
3. Are "supplemental coverages" such as "cancer" or "long-term care" subject to AB 1672?
Yes and no. Insurance Code §10198.6(a} specifically exempts certain types of products, such
as Medicare supplement, long-term care and dental and vision products. All other products
which provide medical, hospital, and surgical benefits, regardless of whether they ::ire pmvicfP.d
on an "indemnity" or expense-incurred basis, are subject to the law. Thus, dread disease and
hospital indemnity products must comply with the law
198.6(a} specifically exempts certain types of products, such
as Medicare supplement, long-term care and dental and vision products. All other products
which provide medical, hospital, and surgical benefits, regardless of whether they ::ire pmvicfP.d
on an "indemnity" or expense-incurred basis, are subject to the law. Thus, dread disease and
hospital indemnity products must comply with the law.
Note that, in contrast to the "small
employer" provisions of AB1672, there is no exemption of products whose cost is not
contributed to by employers.
4_ Must programs established before July 1, 1993 (AB1672's effective date), provide a 30 day
"open enrollment period" for previously-excluded employees and dependents, as required ofsuch
programs when they cover "small employers"?
No, unless the carrier wants to impose or has imposed a special limitation on coverage for "late
enrollees", as defined in Ins. C. §10198.6(b) and as discussed immediately below.
5. On its face, Ins. C. §10198. 7(d)forbids exclusion of late enrollees/or more than 12 months.
Must a health benefit plan accept all late enrollees after 12 months regardless ofmedical status?
We believe that the Section means that there may not be any special limitation, lasting more than
12 months, based on a person's being a late enrollee as defined in Ins. C. §10198.6(b).
Therefore, at the end of 12 months, the late enrollee should have the same rights as a new
enrollee - if new entrants are not medically underwritten, then neither should "late enrollees"
be, at the end of the 12 month waiting period. Simifarly, a per,;on who is: not a late enrollee
under 10198.6(b}, because, for example, he or she had lost other group coverage, would have
to be treated as a new enrollee upon application for coverage. In cases where new employees
or dependents may he excl11rlP-d for underwriting reasons, late enrollees may also be so excluded.
6.
Insurance Code §§10198.6(c) and 10198
month waiting period. Simifarly, a per,;on who is: not a late enrollee
under 10198.6(b}, because, for example, he or she had lost other group coverage, would have
to be treated as a new enrollee upon application for coverage. In cases where new employees
or dependents may he excl11rlP-d for underwriting reasons, late enrollees may also be so excluded.
6.
Insurance Code §§10198.6(c) and 10198. 7(a) seem to limit definitions of "pre-e.xistirtg
conditions" to those for which "medical advice, diagnosis, care, or treatment . . . was
recommended or received . . . " within six months before the effective date of coverage. May
an insurer also include conditions for which a "reasonable " or "prudent" person would have
sought advice or treatment within that si.x months? May the definition include conditions which
became "manifest" within that period?
No.
Only those conditions described in the cited Code Sections may be "pre-existing
conditions". An insurer may make the definition of "pre-existing conditions" more precise, such
3

as by defining "medical advice", etc., more specifically, but it may not expand the definition
beyond the boundaries established by the Code Sections.
7. When must a plan be brought into compliance with the new law?
The operative provisions (sub§§ (a) and (d) of Ins. C. 10198.7) of AB1672 apply to any product
"... issued, renewed or written by any insurer ... " on or after the effective date of the law -
July 1, 1993. We understand that the intent of the word "written" was to make the law apply
to all programs in force as of that date.
8. Do the "waiting period'' limitations ofABJ672 apply to employer-imposed rules postponing
new employees' eligibility for fringe benefits until they have been at work for some period ofrime
("probationary periods")?
No.
AB1672 does not generally regulate employers' activities. However, such probationary
periods are included in the term "any waiting period" as used in Ins. C. §10198.?(c) - see Item
II, below.
9
riod'' limitations ofABJ672 apply to employer-imposed rules postponing
new employees' eligibility for fringe benefits until they have been at work for some period ofrime
("probationary periods")?
No.
AB1672 does not generally regulate employers' activities. However, such probationary
periods are included in the term "any waiting period" as used in Ins. C. §10198.?(c) - see Item
II, below.
9. If a carrier wants to cover immediately a "late enrollee" who could be excluded entirely for
une yeur, cuuld ir impose a waiver of coverage for a specified pre-existing condition for that
year?
Yes.
lt would appear to be consistent with the law to allow carriers to impose individual
"waiver" riders on late enrollees in lieu of totally excluding them from coverage, for the period
of time that the late enrollee could be excluded entirely. We construe the "small employer"
provisions of AB1672 similarly. (Ins. C. §§10198.6(b) and 10198.?(d)).
10. Does AB 1672 apply to insured "Taft-Hanley" plans?
Insurance products issued to such plans must comply with AB 1672's "employment-related"
provision,;: pf>rtaining to pre-existing conditions limitations and late enrollees regardless of the
size of the employers involved. Note that Title 10, California Code of Regulations §2233. lO(b),
in the Emergency Regulations becoming effective July 1, 1993 (File No RH-317), exempts some
insured "Tuft-Hartley" plans from the "small employer" provisions of AB1G72.
(In~. C.
§10198.6(a)).
11. Does AB 1672 apply to selfinsured "large employer plans n?
"Self-insured" plans operated by state and local government entities (if not otherwise ex.empted)
and religious organizations must comply with Ins. C. §§10198.6 through 10198.8. Such plans
are not subject to BRISA and are thus not exempt from state regulation under that law's
"preemption provision". (Ins. C. §§10198.?(a) and 10198.7(d)).
4
B 1672 apply to selfinsured "large employer plans n?
"Self-insured" plans operated by state and local government entities (if not otherwise ex.empted)
and religious organizations must comply with Ins. C. §§10198.6 through 10198.8. Such plans
are not subject to BRISA and are thus not exempt from state regulation under that law's
"preemption provision". (Ins. C. §§10198.?(a) and 10198.7(d)).
4

Lawful private single-employer or labor-management ("Tuft-Hartley") self-insured plans which
are otherwise legitimately exempt from state regulation under ERISA need not comply with the
requirements of Ins. C. §10198.7.
(Note that "MEWAs" are illegal under California law.)
However, sub§(e) of the Section prohibits carriers from providing "stop loss" coverages to such
self-insured plans that have pre-existing conditions or late enrollee provisions that are
inconsistent with AB1672.
II. DETERMINING WHETHER A NEW PLAN ENTRANT GETS CREDIT FOR "TIME
SERVED II IN A PRIOR OUALIFYING PLAN.
We understand that the intent underlying the "credit for time served" concept is that, once
someone has entered the private health care sector, he or she need "pay their dues" only once,
unk:s:s that person leaves the sector for so long that their re-entry suggests an anti-selection
motive. A new employee or dependent should not have to suffer new pre-existing conditions
exclusions because the employer or insurer imposes delays between the start of employment and
eligib1l1ty tor coverage which, when added to his or her time between employment periods or
coverages, exceed the 30 or 90 day period applicable under the law.
Insurance Code §10198.7(c)- pertaining to employment-related health insurance- and §10708(c)
- pertaining to "small employer" health insurance - provide that a carrier shall ignore "any
waiting period" in determining whether to give a new pbn entrant "credit for time served" under
a Prior Qualifying Plan against any limitations in the carrier's plan applicable to new entrants
le under the law.
Insurance Code §10198.7(c)- pertaining to employment-related health insurance- and §10708(c)
- pertaining to "small employer" health insurance - provide that a carrier shall ignore "any
waiting period" in determining whether to give a new pbn entrant "credit for time served" under
a Prior Qualifying Plan against any limitations in the carrier's plan applicable to new entrants.
Similarly, the cited Sections require that time attributable to applying for coverage "within the
applicable enrollment period" be ignored in determining whether to give a new plan entrant
"credit for time served." We believe that the phrase "any waiting period", as used in the
Sections, includes both employer-imposed "probationary periods" and carrier-imposed waiting
periods for coverage. We also believe that the phrase ''becomes eligible wit11i11 30 (or 90) days
of termination of prior coverage" should be read as meaning "becomes employed or has a new
health benefit plan take effect. "
m.
CHANGES TO THE EMERGENCY REGULATIONS (FILE No. RH-317)
PERTAINING TO THE "SMALL EMPWYER11 PROVISIONS OF AB1672.
A. The following suhsta.ntive ch:mees have been made in the emergency regulations as set forth
in the "Notice of Proposed Adoption of Emergency Regulations ... ", File No RH-317, dated
June 11, 1993:
1. The last sentence in Section 2233.20(b) has been changed as follows:
5

"Such guarantees must be set forth in the master policy and in the eertificet-es issued le eoWJFCti
employees or in the individual policies issued to stteh covered employees."
2. Section 2233.52 has been stricken entirely and the phrase "or waiting period" has been
stricken from the first sentence of §2233. 70.
B. Addenda to the 1'Notice of Proposed Adoption of Emergency Regulations ... '', File No RH-
117, dated June 11 , 1 991.
1
e master policy and in the eertificet-es issued le eoWJFCti
employees or in the individual policies issued to stteh covered employees."
2. Section 2233.52 has been stricken entirely and the phrase "or waiting period" has been
stricken from the first sentence of §2233. 70.
B. Addenda to the 1'Notice of Proposed Adoption of Emergency Regulations ... '', File No RH-
117, dated June 11 , 1 991.
1. The following text was omitted from the top of Page 3 of because of a reproduction error
(no text ,vas omitted from the regulations): "These regulations are necessary to interpret the
ambiguities and uncertainties in AB 1672 which"
2. On Page 12, "Ms 11 should be deleted from the fourth line of the last paragraph and the last
word on the page should be "your".
IV.
INQUIRIES about this Bulletin or AB 1672 as it applies to Department of
Insurance licensees should be directed to:
Marsha Seeley
California Department of Insurance
Legal Division
45 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone (415) 904-5724
JOHN GARAMENDI
Insurance Commissioner
1R7 :>\~Q141reM.R:>4
6

## Nearby sections

- [CA Bulletin 1980-06 Brokers' Fees and other Similar Fees](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CA_INS_B_1980-06.md)
- [CA Bulletin 1980-12 Unlawful Title Rebates](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CA_INS_B_1980-12.md)
- [CA Bulletin 1987-03 Requirements for Issuance of Variable Life Insurance in California](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CA_INS_B_1987-03.md)
- [CA Bulletin 1991-08 Filing of Data for Determining Life Insurer Valuation (California Insurance Code Section 10480); Issuance of Valuation Certificates](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CA_INS_B_1991-08.md)
- [CA Bulletin 1993-03 Assembly Bill 1672 ("Small Employer Health Insurance Reform").](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CA_INS_B_1993-03.md)
- [CA Bulletin 1993-03A Assembly Bill 1672 ("Small Employer Health Insurance Reform") as amended.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CA_INS_B_1993-03A.md)
- [CA Bulletin 1993-04 Assembly Bill 1672](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CA_INS_B_1993-04.md)
- [CA Bulletin 1993-04A Assembly Bills 1672 and 1768](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CA_INS_B_1993-04A.md)
- [CA Bulletin 1993-06 Dividend Reporting](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CA_INS_B_1993-06.md)
- [CA Bulletin 1994-07 Valuation Interest Rates.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CA_INS_B_1994-07.md)
- [CA Bulletin 1994-09A "Actively at Work" or "Not Disabled" Requirements in Small Employer Health Insurance.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CA_INS_B_1994-09A.md)
- [CA Bulletin 1994-11 Disclosure Required in Condominium Homeowner's Policies. (California Insurance Code (CIC) Section 10087.5)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CA_INS_B_1994-11.md)
- [CA Bulletin 1995-04 Scope of the Permissible Escrow Activities of Title Insurers, Underwritten Title Companies, and Controlled Escrow Companies](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CA_INS_B_1995-04.md)
- [CA Bulletin 1995-06 Immediate Payment of Claims.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CA_INS_B_1995-06.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/CA_INS_B_1993-04. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.