# AZ Circular Letter 2000-13: AZ Circular Letter 2000-13: Health Care Appeals Laws Revisions from HB 2600 and SB 1330

> Arizona · Agency guidance · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/AZ_INS_CL_2000_13

## Section

- **Citation:** AZ Circular Letter 2000-13
- **Heading:** AZ Circular Letter 2000-13: Health Care Appeals Laws Revisions from HB 2600 and SB 1330
- **Jurisdiction:** Arizona
- **Kind:** Agency guidance
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** August 14, 2026
- **Source:** Compiled text
- **Location:** Arizona Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions Bulletins / AZ Circular Letter 2000-13: Health Care Appeals Laws Revisions from HB 2600 and SB 1330

## Text

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
2910 North 44th Street, Second Floor, Phoenix, Arizona 85018-7256 ∙ (602) 912-8456 ∙ FAX: (602) 912-8452
Circular Letter 2000-13
To:
All Health Care Insurers, Health Care Services Organizations, Hospital
Service Corporations, Prepaid Dental Plan Organizations,
Medical Service Corporations, Dental Service Corporations,
Optometric Service Corporations, Utilization Review Agents,
Insurance Trade Associations And Interested Parties
From:
Charles R. Cohen
Director of Insurance
Date:
October 16, 2000
Re:
Health Care Appeals Laws Revisions from HB 2600 and SB 1330
This Circular Letter addresses procedural changes in the health care appeals process, and
should be read together with Circular Letter 2000-6, issued May 17, 20001 for a complete
understanding of all the changes to Arizona’s health care appeal laws. This Circular Letter
also includes the standardized health care appeals forms that are to be included with health
care appeals packets, a revised health care appeals packet to guide insurers in developing
their own packets, and a revised transmittal form that insurers must use when sending the
Department a request for external independent review.
I. EFFECTIVE DATES
Both HB 2600 and SB 1330 amended the health care appeals process. SB 1330 actually
amended amendments made in HB 2600. This resulted in a complicated series of effective
dates. The changes described in this circular are effective March 1, 2001 unless a different
date is specified.
II. APPLICABILITY
The health care appeals laws expressly apply to the activities of all health care insurers and
utilization review agents (“UR agents”), and are not limited to just the activities of Health Care
Services Organizations (HMOs). (See A.R.S
ted series of effective
dates. The changes described in this circular are effective March 1, 2001 unless a different
date is specified.
II. APPLICABILITY
The health care appeals laws expressly apply to the activities of all health care insurers and
utilization review agents (“UR agents”), and are not limited to just the activities of Health Care
Services Organizations (HMOs). (See A.R.S. §20-2531(A); see also, Circular letter 1999-3,
“Compliance With Arizona’s Health Care Appeals Laws.”)

1 This circular letter focuses on changes in the appeals process (new requirements and elimination of old
requirements). It does not explain terminology that was already defined in the bills or explained in prior circulars,
and should not be treated as an exhaustive description of all steps or requirements in the process.
This circular letter and past circular letters are available on the Department’s web site at www.state.az.us/id.
JANE DEE HULL
GOVERNOR
CHARLES R. COHEN
DIRECTOR

Circular Letter 2000-13
October 13, 2000
Page 2
Effective July 18, 2000, long-term care insurance, Medicare supplement insurance, and multi-
employer benefit plans created under 29 U.S.C. §186(c) have been added to the exceptions
listed in A.R.S. §20-2531(C), and are no longer subject to the appeals process.
III. PROCEDURAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES
Utilization Review & Written Denials (Effective January 1, 2001)
There are new requirements for denials based on medical necessity. When an insurer or its
UR agent denies authorization for a service based on lack of medical necessity, a medical
director with an active, unrestricted license under 32 A.R.S. Chapter 13 or 17 (i.e. an Arizona-
licensed M.D. or a D.O.) must issue and sign a written denial explaining why authorization was
denied. A.R.S. 20-2510(B). Insurers that cover only dental care may substitute an Arizona
dentist licensed under 32 A.R.S. Ch. 11 for the M.D. or D.O
a service based on lack of medical necessity, a medical
director with an active, unrestricted license under 32 A.R.S. Chapter 13 or 17 (i.e. an Arizona-
licensed M.D. or a D.O.) must issue and sign a written denial explaining why authorization was
denied. A.R.S. 20-2510(B). Insurers that cover only dental care may substitute an Arizona
dentist licensed under 32 A.R.S. Ch. 11 for the M.D. or D.O. Insurers that cover only
optometric care may substitute an Arizona optometrist licensed under 32 A.R.S. Ch. 16.
A.R.S. 20-2510(C).
The insurer must send a copy of the written denial to the treating provider and maintain copies
of all denials for Department inspection. A.R.S. 20-2510(B). The Department recommends
that insurers maintain copies for at least 3 years following the later of the date of denial or any
final appeal decision arising from that denial.
Notice Requirements
At the time of issuing a denial, insurers must also notify insureds of the right to appeal the
denial. (A.R.S. §20-2533(D).) Insurers that issue an explanation of benefits (EOB) must
prominently display a statement about the right to appeal on the EOB form. If an insurer does
not issue an EOB, it must find some other reasonable means to advise the insured of the right
to appeal. An insurer may satisfy this obligation by giving a form statement about the right to
appeal to the insured’s treating provider, who must then notify the insured of the right to
appeal. An insurer that intends to have the treating provider notify insureds of appeal rights
must incorporate this duty into its provider contracts as an express obligation.
The goal of this new requirement is to alert an insured that he or she may challenge certain
insurer decisions with which the insured disagrees, at the very time the insured is most aware
of and affected by the decision. This requirement recognizes that insureds may not retain
information provided at open enrollment or policy renewal, and may not remember that
Arizona has an appeals process
tion.
The goal of this new requirement is to alert an insured that he or she may challenge certain
insurer decisions with which the insured disagrees, at the very time the insured is most aware
of and affected by the decision. This requirement recognizes that insureds may not retain
information provided at open enrollment or policy renewal, and may not remember that
Arizona has an appeals process. This consideration will guide the Department in assessing
whether an insurer has used reasonable means to give notice.

Circular Letter 2000-13
October 13, 2000
Page 3
Information Packets on the Appeals Process
Insurers are generally required to send their insureds an information packet on the appeals
process.2 The packets must contain the information listed in A.R.S. §20-2533(C). The new
law requires insurers to add new information to the packet, and to provide the packets to
insureds and their treating providers at different points in the appeals process. The new
requirements are described in Circular Letter 2000-6, at p. 20, and summarized below.
New information: The information packets must: (1) advise the insured that the insured is not
responsible for the cost of an external independent review; (2) advise the insured that the
Department’s consumer assistance unit is available to help the insured; (3) include the
Department’s consumer assistance phone number; and (4) include standardized forms
(developed by the Department) that an insured can use to pursue an appeal.
Distribution: Insurers must send information packets: (1) at initial enrollment; (2) when the
insured commences an appeal; and (3) upon request of an insured or treating provider. The
insurer must also send a separate reminder notice at annual renewal. The insurer is no longer
required to automatically send another copy of the information packet at formal appeal if the
insurer already sent a packet when the insured filed for informal reconsideration. Packets
need not be sent to a treating provider unless the provider requests a packet
of an insured or treating provider. The
insurer must also send a separate reminder notice at annual renewal. The insurer is no longer
required to automatically send another copy of the information packet at formal appeal if the
insurer already sent a packet when the insured filed for informal reconsideration. Packets
need not be sent to a treating provider unless the provider requests a packet.
The Appeal Process
With the changes in the law, Arizona now effectively has two different forms of appeal:
expedited and standard. Expedited appeals are for urgently needed services that an insured
has not yet received. Standard appeals are for non-urgent services and denied claims. An
insurer is not required to offer an expedited appeals process if its utilization review activities
are limited to claims review for services already provided.
Each type of appeal has three levels, as follows:
Expedited
Standard
Level 1.
Expedited Medical Review
Informal Reconsideration3
Level 2.
Expedited Appeal4
Formal Appeal
Level 3.
Expedited External Independent
External Independent Medical Review
Medical Review
The two types of appeals operate in a similar fashion. The primary distinction is that the
expedited appeal has much shorter time frames for each level.

2 As noted throughout this circular, various provisions have different effective dates. Arguably, this requires
insurers to have a different insurance packet for the time period from January 1, 2001 through March 1, 2001, than
for the time period after March 1, 2001. The Department recognizes that this would be administratively
burdensome for insurers and potentially confusing for consumers. For that reason, the model packets and forms
appended to this circular reflect changes effective on and after March 1, 2001. Insurers must use the new packets
on and after March 1, 2001
January 1, 2001 through March 1, 2001, than
for the time period after March 1, 2001. The Department recognizes that this would be administratively
burdensome for insurers and potentially confusing for consumers. For that reason, the model packets and forms
appended to this circular reflect changes effective on and after March 1, 2001. Insurers must use the new packets
on and after March 1, 2001.
3 Insurers are not required to provide informal reconsideration for denied payment of claims, although an insurer
may elect to do so. A.R.S. § 20-2535(A).
4 This provision is effective January 1, 2001. On and after this date, insurers should process expedited appeal
requests pursuant to the time frames for expedited appeals established in HB 2600.

Circular Letter 2000-13
October 13, 2000
Page 4
Expedited Appeals Process (Effective January 1, 2001)
The new law revises the standard to qualify for the expedited process. An expedited appeal
requires the insured’s treating provider to certify in writing, and provide supporting
documentation that the time needed to complete Levels 1 and 2 under the standard process
(60 days) “is likely to cause a significant negative change in the [insured’s] medical condition
at issue [on appeal].” A.R.S. §20-2534(A). Previously, the provider had to certify that the time
necessary to complete the informal reconsideration (a 30-day period) could cause a significant
negative change in the insured’s condition. The Department has created a physician
certification form that treating providers may use when requesting expedited review. A copy of
this certification form is enclosed with this Circular Letter as part of the revised health care
appeals information packet. Insurers may not condition provision of an expedited appeal on
use of this or any other specific form.
An insurer may not challenge the provider’s certification or refuse to expedite an appeal if the
provider makes the requisite certification and provides supporting documentation
ertification form is enclosed with this Circular Letter as part of the revised health care
appeals information packet. Insurers may not condition provision of an expedited appeal on
use of this or any other specific form.
An insurer may not challenge the provider’s certification or refuse to expedite an appeal if the
provider makes the requisite certification and provides supporting documentation. The
Department has received several complaints from insureds who alleged that their insurers
were refusing to permit expedited review because the insurer did not feel that the case was of
sufficient urgency. Such refusals are explicitly prohibited under the revised law.
If a provider or an insured asks for expedited review without submitting the required
certification and supporting documentation, the health care insurer or utilization review agent
(UR agent) may treat the case as a standard appeal. The Department recommends that the
insurer or UR agent advise the insured and the provider of this change, and the reason for it,
when sending the 5 day acknowledgement required under A.R.S. §20-2535(B) or A.R.S. §20-
2536(B).
If the certification and supporting documentation are later provided, the insurer and UR agent
must immediately treat the case as an expedited appeal from that point forward, and observe
the time frames for the expedited process.
Similarly, if the insured or provider fails to observe time frames for action under the expedited
process, the insurer may convert the case to a standard appeal, but cannot dismiss the
appeal. The Department expects that insurers will act reasonably in converting a case. For
example, upon receiving a denial at level 1, the provider may appeal to level 2 by
“immediately” submitting the appeal. “Immediately” is not defined, but the Department
interprets this requirement to mean expeditiously in light of the patient’s medical condition.
The provider and insured must have time to receive and review the decision, and to confer
about the appropriate course of action
. For
example, upon receiving a denial at level 1, the provider may appeal to level 2 by
“immediately” submitting the appeal. “Immediately” is not defined, but the Department
interprets this requirement to mean expeditiously in light of the patient’s medical condition.
The provider and insured must have time to receive and review the decision, and to confer
about the appropriate course of action.
Level 1: Expedited Medical Review (Effective January 1, 2001)
If the UR agent upholds the insurer’s denial at this level, the insurer (or its UR agent) must
now provide the insured and treating provider with telephonic as well as written notice of the
denial and the right to immediately proceed to Level 2, an Expedited Appeal.
Level 2: Expedited Appeal (Effective January 1, 2001)
Following a Level 1 denial, A.R.S. §20-2534(E) allows the insured’s treating provider to
request an expedited appeal by immediately submitting a written appeal to the UR agent,
along with any additional material justification or documentation supporting the request. The

Circular Letter 2000-13
October 13, 2000
Page 5
UR agent has 3 business days after receipt of the appeal to notify the insured and the treating
provider of the decision. Medical necessity decisions must be made by a licensed health care
professional as described below. If the denial is upheld at this level, the insurer’s UR agent
must provide the insured and treating provider with telephonic and written notice of the denial
and the right to immediately proceed to Level 3, Expedited External Independent Review.5
At Level 2, if the case involves a question of medical necessity, the insurer or its UR agent
must select a licensed health care professional6 to review the appeal and make the decision.
Registered nurses, pharmacists, technicians and therapists are not included in the list of
licensed professionals who can render medical necessity appeals decisions at this level.
Decisions involving coverage issues need not be rendered by a licensed health care
professional
ty, the insurer or its UR agent
must select a licensed health care professional6 to review the appeal and make the decision.
Registered nurses, pharmacists, technicians and therapists are not included in the list of
licensed professionals who can render medical necessity appeals decisions at this level.
Decisions involving coverage issues need not be rendered by a licensed health care
professional. (Note: If a medical necessity case is appealed to Level 3, the insurer must
advise the Department of the name and qualifications of the licensed professional issuing the
Level 2 denial.)
UR Agent Option to Skip Levels 1 and 2
As under the standard appeal process, the UR agent, at any time, has the option of skipping
Level 1 or 2, and immediately submitting a case for external independent review (Level 3). If
the UR agent skips to Level 3, the UR agent need not comply with Level 2 requirements, but
must send the insured and treating provider a written acknowledgment that the appeal was
sent for Expedited External Independent Review.
Standard Appeals Process
Level 1: Informal Reconsideration
Other than the changes discussed above related to distribution of the information packets, the
requirements for Level 1 (Informal Reconsideration) are unchanged.
Level 2: Formal Appeal
The changes to the requirements for distribution of the information packets (discussed above)
also affect this level. Also, effective January 1, 2001, as under Level 2 of the expedited
process, insurers must have a licensed health care professional (as that term is defined in
A.R.S. §20-2536(D)) render a decision only for appeals of denials based on lack of medical
necessity. Previously, insurers were required to have all Formal Appeal decisions (including
contract coverage cases) decided by licensed health care professionals.
Level 3: External Independent Review
Expedited and Standard Processes
Circular Letter 2000-6, pp
h care professional (as that term is defined in
A.R.S. §20-2536(D)) render a decision only for appeals of denials based on lack of medical
necessity. Previously, insurers were required to have all Formal Appeal decisions (including
contract coverage cases) decided by licensed health care professionals.
Level 3: External Independent Review
Expedited and Standard Processes
Circular Letter 2000-6, pp. 20-22, includes a detailed discussion of the changes to the external
independent review that occur at Level 3, including the different time periods applicable to
expedited and standard appeals. This Circular Letter will address only procedural issues.

5 Expedited review at Level 3 is not effective until March 1, 2001.
6 Providers who qualify as “licensed health care professionals” are listed in A.R.S. §20-2534(E). Essentially, the
statute requires that the reviewing provider be one who is qualified in a scope of practice similar to that of the
treating provider, or one who typically manages the medical condition on appeal. Insurers should carefully review
this statute to ensure that their process is consistent with statutory requirements.

Circular Letter 2000-13
October 13, 2000
Page 6
Effective March 1, 2001, utilization review agents and health care insurers will no longer select
the external independent reviewers for health care appeals and cannot send the appeals
directly to an external independent reviewer. As of that date, the Department’s previously
published 2000-2001 list of external independent reviewers for health care appeals is void,
and all external appeal requests must be sent to the Department of Insurance. Any case that
is submitted for external independent review after March 1, 2001 must be sent to the
Department, even if the appeal was commenced at Level 1 or 2 prior to that date.
The process for external independent review is the same for expedited and standard appeals
except for the time in which decisions must be rendered
ll external appeal requests must be sent to the Department of Insurance. Any case that
is submitted for external independent review after March 1, 2001 must be sent to the
Department, even if the appeal was commenced at Level 1 or 2 prior to that date.
The process for external independent review is the same for expedited and standard appeals
except for the time in which decisions must be rendered. To request external independent
review, an insurer (or the UR agent acting on its behalf) must send the Department all of the
information listed below with a completed transmittal form.
1. The request for external independent review submitted by the provider or insured,
and any pertinent correspondence between the enrollee, provider, and insurer.
2. The insured’s policy, certificate, evidence of coverage, or similar document.
3. All medical records.
4. Supporting documentation used to render the decision.
5. Summary description of the applicable issues.
6. A statement of the utilization review agent’s or insurer’s decision.
7. The utilization review agent’s or insurer’s criteria used and any clinical reasons for
the decision.
8. The relevant portions of the utilization review agent’s utilization review plan.
If the appeal involves a question of medical necessity, insurers must send the Department 2
copies of all items listed above. Failure to include all of the necessary materials can delay
processing of an appeal and potentially result in civil penalty assessments.
On and after March 1, 2001, insurers must use Transmittal Form P-1098, Rev. 10/00, (copy
attached) when sending the Department the materials listed above. After that date, the
Department will not accept the prior version of the Transmittal Form P-1098. The new
transmittal form includes space for the name and credentials of the health care provider who
reviewed the case at the lower appeal level, as required under A.R.S. §20-2533(G).
Previously, A.R.S
l Form P-1098, Rev. 10/00, (copy
attached) when sending the Department the materials listed above. After that date, the
Department will not accept the prior version of the Transmittal Form P-1098. The new
transmittal form includes space for the name and credentials of the health care provider who
reviewed the case at the lower appeal level, as required under A.R.S. §20-2533(G).
Previously, A.R.S. §20-2537(I)(3) prohibited disclosure of the names of the insured and the
treating providers in materials sent to the external independent reviewer. As of March 1, 2001,
this requirement is repealed and materials sent to the Department should not have this
information removed.
Procurement and Payment of Independent Review Organizations
The Department is required to procure independent review organizations (IROs) to conduct
medical reviews of Level 3 appeals that involve questions of medical necessity. Through the
State Procurement Office, the Department will procure a contract for IRO services. The
contract will specify that:

Circular Letter 2000-13
October 13, 2000
Page 7
1. A procured IRO must use appropriately licensed physicians and health care
professionals who typically manage the medical condition, treatment, or procedure
under review.
2. The IRO and its individual reviewers shall not have a substantial interest in the
member, provider, or health care insurer involved in the particular case under review
or any other conflict of interest that would prevent the reviewer from making a fair
and impartial decision.
3. The individual medical reviewer cannot be a policyholder or insured member of the
insurer whose decision is under review.
The Department will attempt to procure the services of IROs that accept compensation on a
“per case rate.”
A.R.S. §20-2540 establishes a health care appeals fund from which the Department will pay
the costs billed for independent medical reviews performed by the IROs
cision.
3. The individual medical reviewer cannot be a policyholder or insured member of the
insurer whose decision is under review.
The Department will attempt to procure the services of IROs that accept compensation on a
“per case rate.”
A.R.S. §20-2540 establishes a health care appeals fund from which the Department will pay
the costs billed for independent medical reviews performed by the IROs. The Department will
recover from an insurer the cost of an independent medical review for an appeal originating
from that particular insurer. The Department will provide more detailed information and
guidance on the process and procedures for administration of the health care appeals fund
when the fund becomes operational.
IV. HEALTH CARE APPEALS INFORMATION PACKET
Information Packet
The Department has revised the text of the sample information packet that insurers must
provide to their insureds. A copy of the sample packet is attached to this Circular Letter. It
reflects the changes in the process and the new information requirements. Insurers are not
required to use the sample packet verbatim, but must use it as a guide in designing their own
form. The Department encourages insurers to adhere closely to the sample packet so that the
language and format will be readily familiar to consumers who may switch between different
insurers and plans. Some insurers may wish to supplement the standard packet. The
Department has approved packets with supplemental information that is specific to a particular
insurer, or its product or members. An insurer must customize the forms by inserting the
following specific information at the spaces designated in the packet:
1. Name of the health care insurer.
2. The titles, telephone and FAX numbers, and addresses of the contact person and
processing person for the different appeals levels.
ackets with supplemental information that is specific to a particular
insurer, or its product or members. An insurer must customize the forms by inserting the
following specific information at the spaces designated in the packet:
1. Name of the health care insurer.
2. The titles, telephone and FAX numbers, and addresses of the contact person and
processing person for the different appeals levels.

Circular Letter 2000-13
October 13, 2000
Page 8
3. If an insurer allows insureds that are appealing denied claims to begin the appeals
process at the Informal Reconsideration level, the insurer must modify the packet to
include the appropriate information for processing those appeals. If the insurer
requires insureds to begin at the Formal Appeal level, the insurer should omit
the bracketed text from the model in the Informal Reconsideration section of the
packet.
Insurers must file their customized packet with the Department’s Life and Health Division for
review and approval prior to use. Utilization review agents must use the insurer’s approved
packet, and cannot create their own packets.
Standardized Appeal Forms
The Department has also developed two standardized forms that consumers may use when
pursuing an appeal. The standardized forms are: (1) an appeal request form, and (2) a
physician certification. (copies attached). Insurers are required to include these forms with the
information packet.
These forms are included as a convenience for insureds and providers. Insurers may not
mandate use of these forms, or reject an appeal because an insured or provider
chooses not to use the standard forms.
The
information
packet
and
forms
are
available
on
the
Department’s
website
www.state.az.us/id. After entering the website, click on Publications, from there, look under
Information Brochures, and then under HealthCare Appeals Information Packet.
V
ders. Insurers may not
mandate use of these forms, or reject an appeal because an insured or provider
chooses not to use the standard forms.
The
information
packet
and
forms
are
available
on
the
Department’s
website
www.state.az.us/id. After entering the website, click on Publications, from there, look under
Information Brochures, and then under HealthCare Appeals Information Packet.
V. REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE
The Department will continue to audit health care insurers for compliance with Arizona’s health
care appeals laws. To date, some of the more common deficiencies identified through the
audit process include:
1. Failing to distribute health care appeals information packets.
2. Delegating the processing of appeals to a third party, but failing to monitor the third
party’s performance to see that it is consistent with Arizona law.
3. Failing to include the criteria used and the clinical reasons for appeal decisions.
Simply stating that a service or claim is “not medically necessary” or “not covered” is
insufficient. The written appeal decision must include the policy and utilization
review provisions that justify and explain the decision.
4. Requiring insureds to go through two formal appeals rather than having the case
sent for external independent review.
5. Failing to send written acknowledgements to the member and treating provider
within 5 business days of receiving the appeal.
6. Rejecting appeal requests that originate with the provider.
7. Failing to render appeal decisions within statutory time frames.
8. Treating appeal requests as “complaints” or “grievances” not subject to the health
care appeals process, rather than as appeals.
t review.
5. Failing to send written acknowledgements to the member and treating provider
within 5 business days of receiving the appeal.
6. Rejecting appeal requests that originate with the provider.
7. Failing to render appeal decisions within statutory time frames.
8. Treating appeal requests as “complaints” or “grievances” not subject to the health
care appeals process, rather than as appeals.

Circular Letter 2000-13
October 13, 2000
Page 9
9. Processing appeals differently than indicated in the insurer’s health care appeals
information packet. For example, some insurers’ packets require an insured to
initiate an appeal of a denied claims payment at the formal appeal level. This would
result in only one internal appeal at the insurer, as external independent review is
the next step after formal appeal. In practice, however, the insurer treats the initial
appeal as an informal reconsideration, and subjects the insured to two levels of
appeal at the insurer.
10. Suspending all action on an appeal request if the request does not include medical
records or other supporting documentation. This is not permissible. A.R.S. §20-
2535 expressly permits an insured to orally request an appeal. The Department
expects insurers to comply with the specific time requirements in A.R.S. §§20-2535
and 20-2536 and regards insurers as having an affirmative duty to advise the
insured if supporting documentation or records are required for the insurer to fairly
evaluate the appeal. A UR agent may hold an appeal open pending the receipt of
any requested additional information. However, if the insured or treating provider
fails to submit the requested information within the statutory time frame, the UR
agent must still issue a timely decision based on all other available information. A
decision that is based on lack of information should so specify. If the insured or
provider submits the requested information after a decision is rendered, the insurer
must treat the new information as a request for appeal to the next level
submit the requested information within the statutory time frame, the UR
agent must still issue a timely decision based on all other available information. A
decision that is based on lack of information should so specify. If the insured or
provider submits the requested information after a decision is rendered, the insurer
must treat the new information as a request for appeal to the next level.
Maintenance of Appeals Files
The Department is required to publish an annual report on Arizona’s health care appeals. To
gather information required for this report, the Department sends insurers an annual survey on
health care appeals, and particularly seeks information on the number and outcomes of
appeals conducted at Levels 1 and 2. To provide this information, insurers must track and
maintain complete files of all health care appeals received and processed. These files must
also be maintained in order to facilitate examinations. The Department recommends that
insurers maintain complete appeals files for at least 3 years following issuance of the final
case decision, at whatever level that decision occurs.
Please direct any questions regarding this Circular Letter to Elise Bartlett, Supervisor of the
Health Care Appeals Section at (602) 912-8443.

1
Health Care Insurer Appeals Process Information Packet
[Insurer Name]
CAREFULLY READ THE INFORMATION IN THIS PACKET AND KEEP IT
FOR FUTURE REFERENCE. IT HAS IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT
HOW TO APPEAL DECISIONS WE MAKE ABOUT YOUR HEALTH CARE.
Getting Information About the Health Care Appeals Process
Help in Filing an Appeal: Standardized Forms and Consumer Assistance From
the Department of Insurance
We must send you a copy of this information packet when you first receive your policy,
and within 5 business days after we receive your request for an appeal. When your
insurance coverage is renewed, we must also send you a separate statement to remind you
that you can request another copy of this packet
iling an Appeal: Standardized Forms and Consumer Assistance From
the Department of Insurance
We must send you a copy of this information packet when you first receive your policy,
and within 5 business days after we receive your request for an appeal. When your
insurance coverage is renewed, we must also send you a separate statement to remind you
that you can request another copy of this packet. We will also send a copy of this packet
to you or your treating provider at any time upon request. Just call our customer/member
services number at ____________________ to ask.
At the back of this packet, you will find forms you can use for your appeal. The Arizona
Insurance Department (“the Department”) developed these forms to help people who
want to file a health care appeal. You are not required to use them. We cannot reject
your appeal if you do not use them. If you need help in filing an appeal, or you have
questions about the appeals process, you may call the Department’s Consumer Assistance
Office at (602) 912-8444 or 1-(800) 325-2548 or call us at _____________________.
How to Know When You Can Appeal
When [name of insurance company or “we”] do not authorize or approve a service or pay
for a claim, we must notify you of your right to appeal that decision. Your notice may
come directly from us, or through your treating provider.
Decisions You Can Appeal
You can appeal the following decisions:
1. We do not approve a service that you or your treating provider has requested.
2. We do not pay for a service that you have already received.
3. We do not authorize a service or pay for a claim because we say that it is not
“medically necessary.”
4. We do not authorize a service or pay for a claim because we say that it is not
covered under your insurance policy, and you believe it is covered.
5. We do not notify you, within 10 business days of receiving your request,
whether or not we will authorize a requested service.
6. We do not authorize a referral to a specialist.
pay for a claim because we say that it is not
“medically necessary.”
4. We do not authorize a service or pay for a claim because we say that it is not
covered under your insurance policy, and you believe it is covered.
5. We do not notify you, within 10 business days of receiving your request,
whether or not we will authorize a requested service.
6. We do not authorize a referral to a specialist.

2
Decisions You Cannot Appeal
You cannot appeal the following decisions:
1. You disagree with our decision as to the amount of “usual and customary
charges.” [Insurers may wish to insert their definition of UCR when
customizing their packets.]
2. You disagree with how we are coordinating benefits when you have health
insurance with more than one insurer.
3. You disagree with how we have applied your claims or services to your plan
deductible.
4. You disagree with the amount of coinsurance or copayments that you paid.
5. You disagree with our decision to issue or not issue a policy to you.
6. You are dissatisfied with any rate increases you may receive under your
insurance policy.
7. You believe we have violated any other parts of the Arizona Insurance Code.
If you disagree with a decision that is not appealable according to this list, you may still
file a complaint with the Arizona Department of Insurance, Consumer Affairs Division,
2910 N. 44th, Second Floor, Phoenix, AZ 85018.
Who Can File An Appeal?
Either you or your treating provider can file an appeal on your behalf. At the end of this
packet is a form that you may use for filing your appeal. You are not required to use this
form, and can send us a letter with the same information. If you decide to appeal our
decision to deny authorization for a service, you should tell your treating provider so the
provider can help you with the information you need to present your case.
Description of the Appeals Process
There are two types of appeals: an expedited appeal for urgent matters, and a standard
appeal. Each type of appeal has 3 levels
d us a letter with the same information. If you decide to appeal our
decision to deny authorization for a service, you should tell your treating provider so the
provider can help you with the information you need to present your case.
Description of the Appeals Process
There are two types of appeals: an expedited appeal for urgent matters, and a standard
appeal. Each type of appeal has 3 levels. The appeals operate in a similar fashion, except
that expedited appeals are processed much faster because of the patient’s condition.
Expedited Appeals
Standard Appeals
(for urgently needed services
(for non- urgent services or denied
you have not yet received)
claims)
Level 1. Expedited Medical Review
Informal Reconsideration1
Level 2 Expedited Appeal
Formal Appeal
Level 3 Expedited External Independent
External Independent Medical

Medical Review
Review
We make the decisions at Level 1 and Level 2. An outside reviewer, who is completely
independent from our company, makes Level 3 decisions. You are not responsible to pay
the costs of the external review if you choose to appeal to Level 3.

1 Many insurers do not provide informal reconsideration of a denied claim; the insured begins at the formal
appeal level. Those insurers can include a footnote to specify that informal reconsideration is not available
for a denied claim.
You are not responsible to pay
the costs of the external review if you choose to appeal to Level 3.

1 Many insurers do not provide informal reconsideration of a denied claim; the insured begins at the formal
appeal level. Those insurers can include a footnote to specify that informal reconsideration is not available
for a denied claim.

3
EXPEDITED APPEAL PROCESS FOR URGENTLY NEEDED SERVICES
NOT YET PROVIDED
Level 1. Expedited Medical Review
Your request: You may obtain Expedited Medical Review of your denied request for a
service that has not already been provided if:
• You have coverage with us,
• We denied your request for a covered service, and
• Your treating provider certifies in writing and provides supporting documentation that
the time required to process your request through the Informal Reconsideration and
Formal Appeal process (about 60 days) is likely to cause a significant negative
change in your medical condition. (At the end of this packet is a form that your
provider may use for this purpose. Your provider could also send a letter or make up
a form with similar information.) Your treating provider must send the certification
and documentation to:
Name:
Title:
Address:
Phone:
Fax:
Our decision: We have 1 business day after we receive the information from the
treating provider to decide whether we should change our decision and authorize your
requested service. Within that same business day, we must call and tell you and your
treating provider, and mail you our decision in writing. The written decision must
explain the reasons for our decision and tell you the documents on which we based our
decision.
If we deny your request: You may immediately appeal to Level 2.
If we grant your request: We will authorize the service and the appeal is over.
If we refer your case to Level 3: We may decide to skip Level 1 and Level 2
and send your case straight to an independent reviewer at Level 3
decision must
explain the reasons for our decision and tell you the documents on which we based our
decision.
If we deny your request: You may immediately appeal to Level 2.
If we grant your request: We will authorize the service and the appeal is over.
If we refer your case to Level 3: We may decide to skip Level 1 and Level 2
and send your case straight to an independent reviewer at Level 3.
Level 2: Expedited Appeal
Your request: If we deny your request at Level 1, you may request an Expedited
Appeal. After you receive our Level 1 denial, your treating provider must immediately
send us a written request (to the same person and address listed above under Level 1) to
tell us you are appealing to Level 2. To help your appeal, your provider should also send

4
us any more information (that the provider hasn’t already sent us) to show why you need
the requested service.
Our decision: We have 3 business days after we receive the request to make our
decision.
If we deny your request: You may immediately appeal to Level 3.
If we grant your request: We will authorize the service and the appeal is over.
If we refer your case to Level 3: We may decide to skip Level 2 and send your
case straight to an independent reviewer at Level 3.
Level 3: Expedited External, Independent Review
Your request: You may appeal to Level 3 only after you have appealed through Levels
1 and 2. You have only 5 business days after you receive our Level 2 decision to send us
your written request for Expedited External Independent Review. Send your request and
any more supporting information to:
Name:
Title:
Address:
Phone:
Fax:
Neither you nor your treating provider is responsible for the cost of any external
independent review.
The process: There are two types of Level 3 appeals, depending on the issues in your
case:
fter you receive our Level 2 decision to send us
your written request for Expedited External Independent Review. Send your request and
any more supporting information to:
Name:
Title:
Address:
Phone:
Fax:
Neither you nor your treating provider is responsible for the cost of any external
independent review.
The process: There are two types of Level 3 appeals, depending on the issues in your
case:
(1) Medical necessity
These are cases where we have decided not to authorize a service because we
think the services you (or your treating provider) are asking for, are not medically
necessary to treat your problem. For medical necessity cases, the independent
reviewer is a provider retained by an outside independent review organization
(“IRO”), that is procured by the Arizona Insurance Department, and not
connected with our company. The IRO provider must be a provider who typically
manages the condition under review.
(2) Contract coverage
These are cases where we have denied coverage because we believe the requested
service is not covered under your insurance policy. For contract coverage cases,
the Arizona Insurance Department is the independent reviewer.

5
Medical Necessity Cases
Within 1 business day of receiving your request, we must:
1. Mail a written acknowledgement of the request to the Director of Insurance,
you, and your treating provider.
2. Send the Director of Insurance: the request for review; your policy, evidence
of coverage or similar document; all medical records and supporting
documentation used to render our decision; a summary of the applicable issues
including a statement of our decision; the criteria used and clinical reasons for our
decision; and the relevant portions of our utilization review guidelines. We must
also include the name and credentials of the health care provider who reviewed
and upheld the denial at the earlier appeal levels
records and supporting
documentation used to render our decision; a summary of the applicable issues
including a statement of our decision; the criteria used and clinical reasons for our
decision; and the relevant portions of our utilization review guidelines. We must
also include the name and credentials of the health care provider who reviewed
and upheld the denial at the earlier appeal levels.
Within 2 business days of receiving our information, the Insurance Director must send all
the submitted information to an external independent reviewer organization (the “IRO”).
Within 5 business days of receiving the information the IRO must make a decision and
send the decision to the Insurance Director.
Within 1 business day of receiving the IRO’s decision, the Insurance Director must mail
a notice of the decision to us, you, and your treating provider.
The decision (medical necessity): If the IRO decides that we should provide the
service, we must authorize the service. If the IRO agrees with our decision to deny the
service, the appeal is over. Your only further option is to pursue your claim in Superior
Court.
Contract Coverage Cases
Within 1 business day of receiving your request, we must:
1. Mail a written acknowledgement of your request to the Insurance Director,
you, and your treating provider.
2. Send the Director of Insurance: the request for review, your policy, evidence
of coverage or similar document, all medical records and supporting
documentation used to render our decision, a summary of the applicable issues
including a statement of our decision, the criteria used and any clinical reasons for
our decision and the relevant portions of our utilization review guidelines.
Within 2 business days of receiving this information, the Insurance Director must
determine if the service or claim is covered, issue a decision, and send a notice to us, you,
and your treating provider.
summary of the applicable issues
including a statement of our decision, the criteria used and any clinical reasons for
our decision and the relevant portions of our utilization review guidelines.
Within 2 business days of receiving this information, the Insurance Director must
determine if the service or claim is covered, issue a decision, and send a notice to us, you,
and your treating provider.

6
Referral to the IRO for contract coverage cases: The Insurance Director is sometimes
unable to determine issues of coverage. If this occurs, the Insurance Director will
forward your case to an IRO. The IRO will have 5 business days to make a decision and
send it to the Insurance Director. The Insurance Director will have 1 business day after
receiving the IRO’s decision to send the decision to us, you, and your treating provider.
The decision (contract coverage): If you disagree with Insurance Director’s final
decision on a contract coverage issue, you may request a hearing with the Office of
Administrative Hearings (“OAH”). If we disagree with the Director’s final decision, we
may also request a hearing before OAH. A hearing must be requested within 30 days of
receiving the Director’s decision. OAH must promptly schedule and complete a hearing
for appeals from expedited Level 3 decisions.
STANDARD APPEAL PROCESS FOR NON-URGENT SERVICES AND DENIED
CLAIMS
Level 1. Informal Reconsideration
Your request: You may obtain Informal Reconsideration of your denied request for a
service [or claim]2 if:
• You have coverage with us,
• We denied your request for a covered service [or claim],
• You do not qualify for an expedited appeal, and
• You or your treating provider asks for Informal Reconsideration within 2 years of the
date we first deny the requested service [or claim] by calling, writing, or faxing your
request to:
Name:
Phone:
Title:
Address:
Fax:
Claim for a covered service already provided but not paid for: You may not obtain
Informal Reconsideration of your denied request for the payment of a covered servi
d appeal, and
• You or your treating provider asks for Informal Reconsideration within 2 years of the
date we first deny the requested service [or claim] by calling, writing, or faxing your
request to:
Name:
Phone:
Title:
Address:
Fax:
Claim for a covered service already provided but not paid for: You may not obtain
Informal Reconsideration of your denied request for the payment of a covered service.
Instead, you may start the review process by seeking Formal Appeal.
{If the insurer permits Informal Reconsideration of a claim for a covered service that
has already been provided, delete the paragraph above and include the bracketed
language in this section that references claims.}
Our acknowledgement: We have 5 business days after we receive your request for
Informal Reconsideration (“the receipt date”) to send you and your treating provider a
notice that we got your request.

2 Bracketed text [ ] should be included if the insurer allows informal reconsideration of a denied claim
payment.

7
Our decision: We have 30 days after the receipt date to decide whether we should
change our decision and authorize your requested service [or pay your claim]. Within
that same 30 days, we must send you and your treating provider our written decision.
The written decision must explain the reasons for our decision and tell you the documents
on which we based our decision.
If we deny your request: You have 60 days to appeal to Level 2.
If we grant your request: The decision will authorize the service [or pay the
claim] and the appeal is over.
If we refer your case to Level 3: We may decide to skip Level 1 and Level 2
and send your case straight to an independent reviewer at Level 3.
Level 2. Formal Appeal
Your request: You may request Formal Appeal if: (1) we deny your request at Level 1,
or (2) you have an unpaid claim and we did not provide a Level 1 review
sion will authorize the service [or pay the
claim] and the appeal is over.
If we refer your case to Level 3: We may decide to skip Level 1 and Level 2
and send your case straight to an independent reviewer at Level 3.
Level 2. Formal Appeal
Your request: You may request Formal Appeal if: (1) we deny your request at Level 1,
or (2) you have an unpaid claim and we did not provide a Level 1 review. After you
receive our Level 1 denial, you or your treating provider must send us a written request
within 60 days to tell us you are appealing to Level 2. If we did not provide a Level 1
review of your denied claim, you have 2 years from our first denial notice to request
Formal Appeal. To help us make a decision on your appeal, you or your provider should
also send us any more information (that you haven’t already sent us) to show why we
should authorize the requested service or pay the claim. Send your appeal request and
information to:
Name:
Phone:
Title:
Address:
Fax:
Our acknowledgement: We have 5 business days after we receive your request for
Formal Appeal (“the receipt date”) to send you and your treating provider a notice that
we got your request.
Our decision: For a denied service that you have not yet received, we have 30 days after
the receipt date to decide whether we should change our decision and authorize your
requested service. For denied claims, we have 60 days to decide whether we should
change our decision and pay your claim. We will send you and your treating provider
our decision in writing. The written decision must explain the reasons for our decision
and tell you the documents on which we based our decision.
If we deny your request or claim: You have 30 days to appeal to Level 3.
If we grant your request: We will authorize the service or pay the claim and the
appeal is over.
ge our decision and pay your claim. We will send you and your treating provider
our decision in writing. The written decision must explain the reasons for our decision
and tell you the documents on which we based our decision.
If we deny your request or claim: You have 30 days to appeal to Level 3.
If we grant your request: We will authorize the service or pay the claim and the
appeal is over.

8
If we refer your case to Level 3: We may decide to skip Level 2 and send your
case straight to an independent reviewer at Level 3.
Level 3: External, Independent Review
Your request: You may appeal to Level 3 only after you have appealed through Levels
1 and 2. You have 30 days after you receive our Level 2 decision to send us your written
request for External Independent Review. Send your request and any more supporting
information to:
Name:
Phone:
Title:
Address:
Fax:
Neither you nor your treating provider is responsible for the cost of any external
independent review.
The process: There are two types of Level 3 appeals, depending on the issues in your
case:
(1) Medical necessity
These are cases where we have decided not to authorize a service because we
think the services you (or your treating provider) are asking for, are not medically
necessary to treat your problem. For medical necessity cases, the independent
reviewer is a provider retained by an outside independent review organization
(IRO), procured by the Arizona Insurance Department, and not connected with
our company. For medical necessity cases, the provider must be a provider who
typically manages the condition under review.
rovider) are asking for, are not medically
necessary to treat your problem. For medical necessity cases, the independent
reviewer is a provider retained by an outside independent review organization
(IRO), procured by the Arizona Insurance Department, and not connected with
our company. For medical necessity cases, the provider must be a provider who
typically manages the condition under review.
(2) Contract coverage
These are cases where we have denied coverage because we believe the requested
service is not covered under your insurance policy. For contract coverage cases,
the Arizona Insurance Department is the independent reviewer.
Medical Necessity Cases
Within 5 business days of receiving your request, we must:
1. Mail a written acknowledgement of the request to the Director of Insurance,
you, and your treating provider.
2. Send the Director of Insurance: the request for review; your policy, evidence
of coverage or similar document; all medical records and supporting
documentation used to render our decision; a summary of the applicable issues
including a statement of our decision; the criteria used and clinical reasons for our
decision; and the relevant portions of our utilization review guidelines. We must
also include the name and credentials of the health care provider who reviewed
and upheld the denial at the earlier appeal levels.

9
Within 5 days of receiving our information, the Insurance Director must send all the
submitted information to an external independent review organization (the “IRO”).
Within 21 days of receiving the information the IRO must make a decision and send the
decision to the Insurance Director.
Within 5 business days of receiving the IRO’s decision, the Insurance Director must mail
a notice of the decision to us, you, and your treating provider.
The decision (medical necessity): If the IRO decides that we should provide the service
or pay the claim, we must authorize the service or pay the claim
he information the IRO must make a decision and send the
decision to the Insurance Director.
Within 5 business days of receiving the IRO’s decision, the Insurance Director must mail
a notice of the decision to us, you, and your treating provider.
The decision (medical necessity): If the IRO decides that we should provide the service
or pay the claim, we must authorize the service or pay the claim. If the IRO agrees with
our decision to deny the service or payment, the appeal is over. Your only further option
is to pursue your claim in Superior Court.
Contract Coverage Cases
Within 5 business days of receiving your request, we must:
1. Mail a written acknowledgement of your request to the Insurance Director,
you, and your treating provider.
2. Send the Director of Insurance: the request for review; your policy, evidence
of coverage or similar document; all medical records and supporting
documentation used to render our decision; a summary of the applicable issues
including a statement of our decision; the criteria used and any clinical reasons for
our decision; and the relevant portions of our utilization review guidelines.
Within 15 business days of receiving this information, the Insurance Director must
determine if the service or claim is covered, issue a decision, and send a notice to us, you,
and your treating provider. If the Director decides that we should provide the service or
pay the claim, we must do so.
Referral to the IRO for contract coverage cases: The Insurance Director is sometimes
unable to determine issues of coverage. If this occurs, the Insurance Director will
forward your case to an IRO. The IRO will have 21 days to make a decision and send it
to the Insurance Director. The Insurance Director will have 5 business days after
receiving the IRO’s decision to send the decision to us, you, and your treating provider
ract coverage cases: The Insurance Director is sometimes
unable to determine issues of coverage. If this occurs, the Insurance Director will
forward your case to an IRO. The IRO will have 21 days to make a decision and send it
to the Insurance Director. The Insurance Director will have 5 business days after
receiving the IRO’s decision to send the decision to us, you, and your treating provider.
The decision (contract coverage): If you disagree with the Insurance Director’s final
decision on a coverage issue, you may request a hearing with the Office of
Administrative Hearings (“OAH”). If we disagree with the Director’s determination of
coverage issues, we may also request a hearing at OAH. Hearings must be requested
within 30 days of receiving the coverage issue determination. OAH has rules that govern
the conduct of their hearing proceedings.

10
Obtaining Medical Records
Arizona law (A.R.S. §12-2293) permits you to ask for a copy of your medical records.
Your request must be in writing and must specify who you want to receive the records.
The health care provider who has your records will provide you or the person you
specified with a copy of your records.
Designated Decision-Maker: If you have a designated health care decision-maker, that
person must send a written request for access to or copies of your medical records. The
medical records must be provided to your health care decision-maker or a person
designated in writing by your health care decision-maker unless you limit access to your
medical records only to yourself or your health care decision-maker.
Confidentiality: Medical records disclosed under A.R.S. §12-2293 remain confidential.
If you participate in the appeal process, the relevant portions of your medical records may
be disclosed only to people authorized to participate in the review process for the medical
condition under review. These people may not disclose your medical information to any
other people
r health care decision-maker.
Confidentiality: Medical records disclosed under A.R.S. §12-2293 remain confidential.
If you participate in the appeal process, the relevant portions of your medical records may
be disclosed only to people authorized to participate in the review process for the medical
condition under review. These people may not disclose your medical information to any
other people.
Documentation for an Appeal
If you decide to file an appeal, you must give us any material justification or
documentation for the appeal at the time the appeal is filed. If you gather new
information during the course of your appeal, you should give it to us as soon as you get
it. You must also give us the address and phone number where you can be contacted. If
the appeal is already at Level 3, you should also send the information to the Department.
The Role of the Director of Insurance
Arizona law (A.R.S. §20-2533(F)) requires “any member who files a complaint with the
Department relating to an adverse decision to pursue the review process prescribed” by
law. This means, that for appealable decisions, you must pursue the health care appeals
process before the Insurance Director can investigate a complaint you may have against
our company based on the decision at issue in the appeal.
The appeal process requires the Director to:
1.
Oversee the appeals process.
2.
Maintain copies of each utilization review plan submitted by insurers.
3.
Receive, process, and act on requests from an insurer for External,
Independent Review.
4.
Enforce the decisions of insurers.

5.
Review decisions of insurers.
6.
Report to the Legislature.
7.
Send, when necessary, a record of the proceedings of an appeal to
Superior Court or to the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).
8.
Issue a final administrative decision on coverage issues, including the
notice of the right to request a hearing at OAH.
urer for External,
Independent Review.
4.
Enforce the decisions of insurers.

5.
Review decisions of insurers.
6.
Report to the Legislature.
7.
Send, when necessary, a record of the proceedings of an appeal to
Superior Court or to the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).
8.
Issue a final administrative decision on coverage issues, including the
notice of the right to request a hearing at OAH.

11
Receipt of Documents
Any written notice, acknowledgment, request, decision or other written document
required to be mailed is deemed received by the person to whom the document is
properly addressed on the fifth business day after being mailed. “Properly addressed”
means your last known address.

[Insurers may insert an address block directing
insureds to submit this form to a specific address.]
HEALTH CARE APPEAL REQUEST FORM
You may use this form to tell your insurer you want to appeal a denial decision.
Insured Member’s Name ____________________ Member ID # _____________________
Name of representative pursuing appeal, if different from above_______________________
Mailing Address __________________________ Phone # _________________________
City
__________________ State __________ Zip Code _________________
Type of Denial: Denied Claim Denied Service Not Yet Received
Name of Insurer that denied the claim/service: ____________________________________
If you are appealing your insurer’s decision to deny a service you have not yet received, will a 30
to 60 day delay in receiving the service likely cause a significant negative change in your health?
If your answer is “Yes,” you may be entitled to an expedited appeal. Your treating provider must
sign and send a certification and documentation supporting the need for an expedited appeal
_________
If you are appealing your insurer’s decision to deny a service you have not yet received, will a 30
to 60 day delay in receiving the service likely cause a significant negative change in your health?
If your answer is “Yes,” you may be entitled to an expedited appeal. Your treating provider must
sign and send a certification and documentation supporting the need for an expedited appeal.
What decision are you appealing? _____________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
(Explain what you want your insurer to authorize or pay for.)
Explain why you believe the claim or service should be covered:
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
(Attach additional sheets of paper, if needed.)
If you have questions about the appeals process or need help to prepare your
appeal, you may call the Department of Insurance Consumer Assistance number
_________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
(Attach additional sheets of paper, if needed.)
If you have questions about the appeals process or need help to prepare your
appeal, you may call the Department of Insurance Consumer Assistance number
(602) 912-8444 or 1-(800) 325-2548, or [name of insurer] at
_____________________.
Make sure to attach everything that shows why you believe your insurer should cover your
claim or authorize a service, including: Medical records Supporting documentation
(letter from your doctor, brochures, notes, receipts, etc.) **Also attach the certification from your
treating provider if you are seeking expedited review.
_____________________________________________ ______________________
Signature of insured or authorized representative
Date

[Insurers may insert an address block directing
providers to transmit this form to a specific location.]
PROVIDER CERTIFICATION FORM
FOR EXPEDITED MEDICAL REVIEWS
(You and your provider may use this form when requesting an expedited appeal.)
A patient who is denied authorization for a covered service is entitled to an expedited appeal if the treating
provider certifies and provides supporting documentation that the time period for the standard appeal process
(about 60 days) “is likely to cause a significant negative change in the [patient’s] medical condition at issue.”
PROVIDER INFORMATION
Treating Physician/Provider___________________________________________________________________
Phone # ________________________________ FAX # _______________________________
Address __________________________________________________________________________________
City _______________________ State __________ Zip Code _________________
PATIENT INFORMATION
Patient’s Name _________________________________________ Member ID # _________________
__________________________
Phone # ________________________________ FAX # _______________________________
Address __________________________________________________________________________________
City _______________________ State __________ Zip Code _________________
PATIENT INFORMATION
Patient’s Name _________________________________________ Member ID # ________________________
Phone # ______________________________________
Address _______________________________________________________________________________
City_______________________ State __________ Zip Code _________________
INSURER INFORMATION
Insurer Name _____________________________________________________________________
Phone # ___________________________ FAX#_______________________________________
Address __________________________________________________________________________
City___________________________________ State __________ Zip Code _________________
•
Is the appeal for a service that the patient has already received?
Yes No
If “Yes,” the patient must pursue the standard appeals process and cannot use the expedited appeals process.
If “No,” continue with this form.
•
What service denial is the patient appealing? ____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
•
Explain why you believe the patient needs the requested service and why the time for the standard appeal process
will harm the patient
expedited appeals process.
If “No,” continue with this form.
•
What service denial is the patient appealing? ____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
•
Explain why you believe the patient needs the requested service and why the time for the standard appeal process
will harm the patient. _______________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Attach additional sheets if needed, and include: Medical records Supporting documentation
If you have questions about the appeals process or need help regarding this certification, you may call the
Department of Insurance Consumer Assistance number (602) 912-8444 or 1 (800) 325-2548. You may also call
[name of insurer] at _______________________.
I certify, as the patient’s treating provider, that delaying the patient’s care for the time period needed for the
informal reconsideration and formal appeal processes (about 60 days) is likely to cause a significant negative
change in the patient’s medical condition at issue.
Provider’s Signature ____________________________________________ Date _______________________
t _______________________.
I certify, as the patient’s treating provider, that delaying the patient’s care for the time period needed for the
informal reconsideration and formal appeal processes (about 60 days) is likely to cause a significant negative
change in the patient’s medical condition at issue.
Provider’s Signature ____________________________________________ Date _______________________

STATE OF ARIZONA HEALTH CARE APPEALS TRANSMITTAL FORM
Is this an Expedited External Independent Review Request? Yes No
This case is a denial based on: lack of medical necessity a coverage issue
Insured Member’s Name ________________________________________________________
Mailing Address ________________________________________________________________
City, State, Zip Code _____________________________________________________________
Insured’s Telephone # _______________________ Member I.D. # ________________________
Insurer’s Name ________________________________________________________________
Insurer NAIC # _________________________________________________________________
Insurer’s Street Address __________________________________________________________
City, State, Zip Code_____________________________________________________________
Telephone # __________________________ FAX # _________________________________
Contact Person Name and Phone no. ________________________________________________
Treating Provider’s Name _______________________________________________________
Office Address __________________________________________________________________
Mailing Address, if different than above: _____________________________________________
City, State, Zip Code ______________________________________________________________
Provider’s Telephone # _____________________________FAX #__________________________
Treating Provider’s Medical Specialty_________________________________________________
(If multiple providers, please list other providers on reverse)
Utilizatio
different than above: _____________________________________________
City, State, Zip Code ______________________________________________________________
Provider’s Telephone # _____________________________FAX #__________________________
Treating Provider’s Medical Specialty_________________________________________________
(If multiple providers, please list other providers on reverse)
Utilization Review Agent _____________________________________________________________
UR Agent’s Street Address ____________________________________________________________
City, State, Zip Code _________________________________________________________________
UR Agent Telephone # ______________________ FAX # ___________________________________
Contact Person ___________________________________
External Review requested by: insured member insurer UR Agent Az D O I
Date External Review requested __________________ Date of Level 2 Decision _________________
Decision to deny or not authorize service or claim was made by:
Insurance Company Health Care Services Org. UR Agent
For medical necessity cases: Name(s) and credentials of provider(s) issuing the level 1 & 2 decisions:
With this form, transmit all items listed below. For medical necessity cases, submit 2 copies of all
items.
1. Copy of the insured’s policy, certificate, evidence of coverage or similar document
2. All medical records
3. Supporting documentation used to render the decision
4. Summary description of the applicable issues
5. A statement of the utilization review agent’s or insurer’s decision
6. The utilization review agent’s or insurer’s criteria used and the clinical reasons for the decision
7. The relevant portions of the utilization review agent’s utilization review plan
8. The insured’s or provider’s letter or appeal form requesting the appeal, and all pertinent
correspondence between the member/enrollee and the insurer.
Form P-1098 Rev. 10/00

## Nearby sections

- [AZ Circular Letter 1981-02 AZ Circular Letter 1981-02: Department Investigation of Workers' Compensation Insurance Replacement](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/AZ_INS_CL_1981_02.md)
- [AZ Circular Letter 1981-03 AZ Circular Letter 1981-03: Reasonableness of Benefits in Relation to Premium Charged](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/AZ_INS_CL_1981_03.md)
- [AZ Circular Letter 1985-02 AZ Circular Letter 1985-02: Intentional Misquoting of Personal Lines Property and Casualty Rates](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/AZ_INS_CL_1985_02.md)
- [AZ Circular Letter 1987-06 AZ Circular Letter 1987-06: Credit Insurance](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/AZ_INS_CL_1987_06.md)
- [AZ Circular Letter 1988-01 AZ Circular Letter 1988-01: Testing of Officers and Employees of Title Insurance Agents](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/AZ_INS_CL_1988_01.md)
- [AZ Circular Letter 1989-02 AZ Circular Letter 1989-02: Unclaimed Property](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/AZ_INS_CL_1989_02.md)
- [AZ Circular Letter 1990-01A AZ Circular Letter 1990-01A: Cancellation or Nonrenewal of Homeowners' Policies](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/AZ_INS_CL_1990_01A.md)
- [AZ Circular Letter 1990-04A AZ Circular Letter 1990-04A: AIDS/HIV Testing and Consent Form](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/AZ_INS_CL_1990_04A.md)
- [AZ Circular Letter 1990-05A AZ Circular Letter 1990-05A: Arizona House Bill 2181 (Chapter 394)](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/AZ_INS_CL_1990_05A.md)
- [AZ Circular Letter 1990-07A AZ Circular Letter 1990-07A: "Moving" Auto Insurance Policyholders to New Companies](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/AZ_INS_CL_1990_07A.md)
- [AZ Circular Letter 1992-01 AZ Circular Letter 1992-01: Medicare Open Enrollment](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/AZ_INS_CL_1992_01.md)
- [AZ Circular Letter 1992-03 AZ Circular Letter 1992-03: Use of United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Registration Numbers as Physician Identification Numbers](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/AZ_INS_CL_1992_03.md)
- [AZ Circular Letter 1992-05 AZ Circular Letter 1992-05: Joint State/Federal Statement on Regulation of MEWAs](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/AZ_INS_CL_1992_05.md)
- [AZ Circular Letter 1994-02 AZ Circular Letter 1994-02: Premium Credit for Subscription to Fire Protection Service](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/AZ_INS_CL_1994_02.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/AZ_INS_CL_2000_13. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.