# THE SOUTHERN UTES

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/tribal%3Asouthern_ute%3A1396150e870441a4

## Record

- **Collection:** Tribal code
- **Document type:** Tribal code

## Text

THE SOUTHERN UTES
A TRIBAL HISTORY

THE

SOUTHERN

UTES

HISTORY

A TRIBAL

Authors

JAMES JEFFERSON
ROBERT W. DELANEY
GREGORY C. THOMPSON

Edited by
FLOYD

A. O’'NEIL

TRIBE

SOUTHERN

UTE

IGNACIO,

COLORADO

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

Copyright 1972
Southern Ute Tribe
Ignacio, Colorado

Printed by the
University of Utah Printing Service
Salt Lake City, Utah 84112

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

Editor’s Note
In 1967, the University of Utah began working with the Southern Ute Tribe in the documentation of some of the memories of the
oldest residents of the tribe. This pleasant relationship has blossomed
into a full-blown effort to document the history of the Utes from their
own point of view, using not only their own testimony but also gathering together a massive collection of documents relating to their history.
In 1971, the Southern Ute Tribal Council applied to the Boettcher
Foundation of Denver, Colorado, the Donner Foundation of New York
City, and to the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Research and Cultural
Studies Development Section, for money to create a tribal history that
would be of general interest, as well as a useable textbook for the
schools serving the children of the Southern Utes.
To write the history, the Southern Ute Tribal Council chose James
Jefferson, a member of the tribe and their public relations director;
Dr. Robert Delaney, of Fort Lewis College, a long time friend of the
tribe and a scholar who has researched their history deeply; and
Gregory C. Thompson, originally of Durango, Colorado, a Research
Associate in American Indian History for the Center for the Studies
of the American West at the University of Utah. I was chosen to coordinate the efforts of the group, to be responsible to report to the tribe,
to assist in documentation, and to serve in an editorial capacity.
I am grateful for the assignment given to me by Mr. Burch and
the Tribal Council. Because Dr. Delaney and Mr. Thompson are not
Indian, and are trained in the traditional disciplines of history, their
writings are clearly separated from those of Mr. Jefferson who represents a more traditional tribal point of view. The first forty-five pages
are the work of Delaney and Thompson. The following forty pages are
the work of Mr. Jefferson.
Within the section which begins with story telling on page 77, a
group of sample stories illustrating the Ute Indian view of life is included. This collection of stories and legends is by no means to be considered complete or definitive, but is included as a sampling to show
the spirit and type of material which forms the traditional body of Ute
oral tradition. A series of maps are included to illustrate clearly and
succinctly what has happened to the Southern Ute lands. The photoiii

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

graphs are from a wide variety of sources, and credit lines for photos
indicate the wide research done in collecting the material for this
volume.
Proper thanks is extended to the members of the Southern Ute
Tribe who willingly gave of their time and knowledge to create this
book; to Dr. C. Gregory Crampton of the Duke Oral Indian History
Project of the University of Utah for his assistance in collection; to the
Center of Southwest Studies, Fort Lewis College, and to Fort Lewis
College generally for their aid and willing cooperation; to the National
Archives, Social and Economic Branch and Mr. Robert M. Kvasnicka,

Assistant Director; to the Federal Records Center at Denver, Colorado,

Delbert Bishop, Director and Robert Svenningsen, Archivist; to the
Museum of the American Indian, New York; to the Smithsonian Insti-

tution, National Anthropological Library; to the Indian Rights Association of Philadelphia, Pa., and to the Pennsylvania Historical Society
where the archives are housed; to Dr. Myra Ellen Jenkins of the New
Mexico Records Center; to Dr. Ward Alan Minge; to Mr. Robert
Morgan who drew the maps; to Mr. Russell Box, who designed the
cover, and to the many others who contributed, our thanks is gratefully
extended.
The errors are those of the authors and the editor, and responsi-

bility is taken by them.

Froyp A. O’NEeIL
Assistant Director,

Center for the Study of the
American West

iv
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

Maps

and Illustrations
Page

Maps
Changes in Ute Lands
The Ute Domain ...
Spanish Expeditions to Ute Country
Spanish-Mexican Land Grants ..
Rivers and Agencies in Southern Ute Land ...

xi

24

Photographs
Rainbow ...
Yamapi
Capote Braves
Group Photograph about 1874
Uncompahgre Chiefs .......
Guero.....

25

Map

Proposed Ute Reservations 1879, 1889

34

Photographs
Group Photographs at Washington Negotiations, 1880 ............
Shavano, 1880
Tapuche
Severo ..
Ignacio

2

Buckskin Charlie ...
Utes at Denver Exposition of 1882-83

40
43

Early Roads and Railroads, c. 1895

4“4

36

Map
v

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

Page
Photographs
Ute Women ...
Buckskin Charlie with Members of his Band .

51
55

Map

63

Neighboring Tribes .....
Photographs
Severo and his Family .__....
Cultural Adaptation among the Tribes
Ignacio ...
Consolidated Ute Headquarters
Ignacio Indian Boarding School

87

88
88

Maps

Western Southern Ute Reservation
Eastern Southern Ute Reservation

89
90

vi
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

Introduction
Utes
The oldest continuous residents of Colorado are the Ute Indians.
It is not known exactly when the Utes came from the north and west
and inhabited the mountainous areas of the present-day states of Colorado, Utah (which name comes from the Ute people), and New
Mexico. We do know that the earliest Utes came into the present day
United States along the eastern slope of the Rocky Mountains. Probably they found other groups of Indians inhabiting the Great Plains,
and, therefore, had to live in the mountains where it was more difficult
to hunt animals and gather food. It is possible that the coming of the
Utes was the reason for the Anasazis to move into sandstone caves of
the area. Possibly, too, the Utes displaced or replaced those carlier
peoples who had developed in the region from the early Basketmaker
stage through the Developmental Pueblo stage and into the classic
Mesa Verde period. Ruins of the ancient culture of the Anasazi are
to be found throughout the present reservation of the Southern Utes.
If the Utes tried to leave their mountainous area and go other places
to get food, they found other Indian groups already there who would
fight them to drive them out. To the cast and northeast of the Utes
were

the Arapaho,

Cheyennes,

Kiowa,

Apaches,

Comanches,

Sioux,

and Pawnees. To the south were the Navajos and Apaches and only
the Jicarilla band of Apaches were generally friendly to the Utes. To
the west and northwest were the Shoshones, Snakes, Bannocks, Paiutes,

and Goshutes.
The language of the Utes is Shoshonean which is a branch or a
dialect of the Uto-Aztecan language. It is believed that the people who
speak Shoshonean separated from other Uto-Aztecan speaking groups
about the time of the birth of Christ. Other Indian groups of the
U.S. who speak Shoshonean are the Paiutes, Goshutes, Shoshones,
Bannocks, and some tribes in California.
Eventually, the Utes became concentrated into a loose confederation of seven bands. The names of the seven bands and the areas they
lived in before the coming of the Europeans are as follows:

1. The Mouache band lived in southern Colorado and in New
Mexico almost down to Santa Fe.
vii

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

2. The Capote band inhabited the San Luis Valley in Colorado
near the headwaters of the Rio Grande and in New Mexico
especially around the region where the towns of Chama and
Tierra Amarilla are now located.
3. The Weeminuche occupied the valley of the San Juan River
and its northern tributaries in Colorado and northwestern New
Mexico.
4. The Tabeguache (also called Uncompahgre) lived in the valleys of the Gunnison and Uncompahgre Rivers in Colorado.

5. The Grand River Utes (also called Parianuc) lived along that
river in Colorado and Utah.
6. The Yampa band
adjacent land.

inhabited

the Yampa

River Valley and

7. The Uintah Utes inhabited the Uintah Basin, especially the
western portion.

Of the bands mentioned above, the first two (Motuache and Capote) make up the present day Southern Utes with headquarters at
Ignacio, Colorado. The Weeminuches are now called the Ute Mountain Utes with headquarters at Towaoc, Colorado. The last four mentioned (Tabeguache, Grand, Yampa, and Uintah) now comprise the
Northern Utes on the Uintah-Ouray Reservation with headquarters at
the town of Fort Duchesne, Utah.
A long time ago, these seven groups of Utes were broken up into
small family units for a large portion of each year. It was necessary
to do this because food was scarce and it took a large area in the mountains to support a small number of people. Fach family unit had to
have a great deal of room since food-gathering couldn’t be done so well
in large groups. From carly spring until late in the fall, these family
units of Utes would hunt for deer, clk, antelope, and other animals;
they would gather seeds of grasses, wild berries and fruits; occasionally
they would plant corn, beans, and squash in mountain meadows and
harvest them in the autumn. At that time, they did not have horses
which would have made the hunting easier, nor did they have any
tools except those made of stone. Each family unit used to follow a
regular circuit during most of the year, going to places where they
knew they could gather food for the winter.
viii
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

Late in the fall, the family units would begin to move out of the
mountains into sheltered areas for the winter months. Generally, the
family units of a particular band of Utes would live close together during the winter. The Capotes, Mouache, and Weeminuche would each
live through the winter some place in northwestern New Mexico or
northeastern Arizona. The Tabeguache or Uncompahgre would
select some place between Montrose and Grand Junction. The Northern Utes would live at some place along the White, the Green, or the
Colorado rivers. The winters were great social occasions for the different bands. There would be much visiting and many festivities. This
was also the time when marriages would be contracted. For four days
in early spring, the band would hold the Bear Dance, the most ancient
and typical of all the Ute dances. Then each family unit would prepare to go its separate way until the next winter time. They would
follow the migrating deer, antelope, and elk for food until seeds and
berries began to ripen in the mountains.
This way of life was to change for the Utes when the Spaniards
colonized and occupied New Mexico at the end of the sixteenth century. The reason for this change is that although the Europeans didn’t
have many of the plants of the Americas, they had livestock and it is
livestock, especially the horse, which changed the life style. The
Southern Utes made contact with the Spanish in New Mexico in the
1630’s and 40’s. At first there were peaceful relations between the two
peoples and some trade was carried on. The Utes had dried meat and
hides which they traded for knives and other metal utensils and agricultural products raised by the Pueblo Indians and the Spanish. Much
of this trading was done at the annual fairs held at Pecos and Taos.
The

Utes,

however,

became

much

more

interested

in trading

for

horses. Horses were very expensive in those days and the Utes would
trade even children to the Spanish for horses. (The Spanish generally
trained those children to be excellent herders.) Possession of horses
allowed the Utes to begin buffalo hunting on the eastern slope of the
Rocky Mountains and the buffalo soon became one of their main resources, because it would provide them with many useful products:
e.g., meat for food (one wouldn’t have to work so hard gathering
food); hides for tepee covers, blankets, clothing, moccasins, and bags
of all kinds; sinew thread for sewing and for bowstrings; horn and
hoof glue for many purposes. And with the horse, the Utes could more
easily evade their enemies, transport their goods to a central camp
ix

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

where the women and children were protected, and range farther to
hunt for food.
So the Utes no longer needed to spread out thinly in family units.
They could live in larger numbers under a more powerful leader. The
family unit continued to be the basic unit of society but the leader
directed camp movements, hunts, raids, and war parties. In hunting
the buffalo the Utes came into frequent contact with the Arapahos,
Kiowas, Cheyennes, Sioux, and Comanche who had many more horses
than the Utes. The Utes needed more horses. So they became aggressive and warlike. Also, it was much easier to raid for livestock (sheep,
goats, cattle) in New Mexico than to hunt deer and other animals, or
to buy livestock. So the Utes became raiders, moving out of their
mountain fortresses to raid other Indian groups or towns and villages to
the south.

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

2,6l

31N

310

OLLVANIS 38

59815 Avin
Q3HSI8YLS3

NVIONI

SNOLWAY3S3Y

AMOLIY3L

g

R4S

€/81

)WA, v

AYOLIMY3L

1\

NVIONI

saNnows
ONLINAH

31N

O'Neil, University of Utah

From the collection of FloydA

310 NY3HLNOS

898l
@98l
Q3HsEYLS3
NOILVAYZS 3.
ST, NG3HIN0S

7

IYOHVIWOONN

A

xi

The Spanish Period
The first European people to invade the Ute lands were the
Spanish. With the arrival of the Spanish came the horse and a
change of life style for the Ute people. Prior to the arrival of the
Spanish and the horse, the cultural level of the Utes was considered
low by the Plains Indians and those people located to the south of the
Ute domain. The Spanish helped to change the view of the Utes that
other Indian tribes held.
In a short time after Christopher Columbus landed in the Caribbean Isles in 1492, the Spanish explored that region, sailed along the
eastern shores of the North and South Americas, discovered the Pacific,

navigated the Gulf of Mexico, located the mouth of the Mississippi
River, landed in Florida and conquered Mexico. All of this had been
accomplished by 1530, only forty years after Europe had discovered
the American continent. Ten years later Francisco Vasquez de Coronado extended the invasion of the Spanish into northern New Spain,
now northern Mexico and southwestern United States.
The desire for wealth had brought the Spanish to the American
continent and Coronado to the Southwest. The Indians had told the
Spanish stories of the rich cities of Cibola lying to the north. Coronado and his men were looking for these seven cities of Cibola when
they came upon the Zuni pueblo and later discovered the Grand Canyon. Coronado’s expedition failed to find the great wealth told of in
the stories, but they did explore a large portion of the Southwest and
Plains regions of the United States.
While crossing the plains of northeastern New Mexico, Coronado
may have encountered a group of Utes. By the time of Coronado the
Utes were trading with the Plains Indians for products that could then
be taken to the trading centers of Taos and Pecos in New Mexico.
Buffalo hides and meat were important parts of these trading relations; consequently, the Utes were called “buffalo eaters” or Querechos
by the Spanish.
The stories of riches to the north continued to bring more Spanish
explorers or conquistadores into New Mexico. One of these stories
talked of the rich lands of Copala, an area far to the north of Mexico.

15, Lyman Tyler, “The Yuta Indians Before 1680,” Western Humanities Review, V
(Spring, 1951), 157-58.

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

2

The Southern Utes

The Indians of Mexico and Central America believed that their ancestors had come from seven caves near the Lake of Copala. Other names
for the lake included Lake Timpanogos and Utah Lake.* The land
of Copala, or as it was sometimes called Teguayo, must have included
the lands of the Ute Indians.
Of the numerous explorers sent from Mexico to find the land and
wealth of Copala, Juan de Ofiate was the most important. He left
Mexico in February, 1598, and five months later settled at San Juan
de los Caballeros, near the present site of the San Juan pueblo. By
1604 Ofiate had organized an expedition to search for the Lake of
Copala. He failed to reach the area, but his efforts to settle New
Mexico and to send expeditions to the northern areas helped others
who came later to identify the land of Copala as the Ute land in
Colorado and Utah.
The description for going to the Lake of Copala was given by a
group of Jémez Indians. They stated:

To go straight to the Lake of Copala a guide was not necessary. One
must follow the river Chama, and past the tribe of the Navajo Apaches
there is a great river which flows to the lake, and with good grass and
fields and that in the arca between the north and northwest the land was
fertile, good and level, and that there are many nations, the province of
Quazula, the Qusutas, and further inland another nation settled.?
With these efforts to locate Copala and the trips onto the plains
area, better descriptions and more knowledge of the Utes were gained.
Vicente de Zaldivar described sceing a group of Ute tents:

They were ... very bright red and white in color and bell shaped, with
flags and openings, and built as skillfully as those of Italy and so large
that in the most ordinary ones four different mattresses and beds were
casily accommodated. The tanning is so fine that although it should
rain bucketfulls it will not pass through nor stiffen the hide, but rather
upon drying it remains as soft and pliable as before.*
Zaldivar’s description of the men and the women of the Utes indicated
that:

Most of the men were said to go naked, probably with breechcloths, but
the women wore sort of trousers of buckskin and ‘shoes and leggins, after
#S. Lyman Tyler, “Before Escalante: An Early History of the Yuta Indians and Area

North of New Mexico..." (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of History, University of Utah, 1951), pp. 58-9.
5 Ibid., p. 73.
+Ibid., p. 66.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

The Spanish Period

3

their own fashion.” They would hold a piece of meat, almost raw, in one
hand, and a picce of suet in the other. The suet was used as bread. They
would take a bite of the meat and then one of the bread. On this diet
they were said to grow very strong and courageous. As weapons they
had a spear with a long thick point, and arrows tipped with flint which
were ‘better than spears to kill cattle. They were said to be very skillful
with the bow and arrow and were able to kill a buffalo with the first
shot. These Indians would hide themselves in blinds of brush near watering places and ambush the buffalo as they came to drink.*
After the attempts of Ofiate to find the land of Copala the Spanish had contact with the Utes only occasionally for the next few years.
During this period, the first known Spanish conflict with the Utes in or
near southern Colorado developed. It was caused by an unjust war
waged against them by the governor of New Mexico, Luis de Rosas.
The first of these encounters recorded was in 1637. About 80 “Utacas”
(probably Mouache of the Upper Rio Grande) were captured and
forced to labor in work shops established in Santa Fe:* The war on the
Utes ended in 1641 with the naming of a new governor of New Mexico.
During the next forty years, Spanish contact with the Utes was altered.
Trade had existed between the Spanish and the Utes. After the Ute
war this trade increased. Early reports indicate the trade was centered
at Taos where the Utes were able to trade with both Spanish and
Indians of the northern Pueblos.
The items of trade for the Utes were those products derived from
the buffalo hunts on the plains. Meat, hides, tallow, suet, and salt were
all brought to the Taos pueblo for trading purposes. In the earlier
stages of the trade with the Spanish the Utes used dogs as animals of
burden to transport the goods to the trading locations. An account of

this was recorded by Zaldivar. He wrote:

It is a sight worth seeing and very laughable to see them travelling, the
ends of the poles draging on the ground, nearly all of them snarling in
their encounters, to load them the Indian women seize their heads between their knees and thus load them or adjust the load, which is seldom

required, because they travel along at a steady gait as if they had been

trained by means of a rein.’

In return for their goods the Utes received cotton blankets, pottery, corn and small green stones. Later, after the Utes had learned to

5 Ibid., pp. 66-67.
¢ Albert H. Schroeder, “A Brief History of the Southern Utes,” Southwestern Lore,
XXX, No. 4 (1965), 53-78.
7 Tyler, “Before Escalante,” p. 66.

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

4

The Southern

use horses, they were also traded.

Utes

Captives taken in raids on other

tribes were exchanged by the Utes for the horses.
In the early 1700’s, the village of Espafiola (La Cafiada) became
the main center for trading Spanish products with the Utes. Of
course, they were regular participants at the yearly Taos fair where
many different Indian groups met to exchange necessary products. To
deny an Indian tribe the right to engage in trading activities at the
yearly fair usually meant war. That trading at Pecos, Taos, Picuris,
and other places had been carried on long before the arrival of the
Spanish and was tremendously important to most Indian groups.
Indians who

lived close to the Pucblo

Indians of New

Mexico,

including the Utes, constantly disrupted Spanish control of and
arrangements with thosc Pucblos. Spanish officials always had to
guard against any possible alliance between the Pueblos and the Utes
or other frontier Indians for the safety of the Spanish population of
New Mexico. The Spanish were generally successful, because the Utes
and other tribes raided the Pueblos. Thus the Pucblos and the frontier
tribes were not friendly, and the Spanish only occasionally fought with
the frontier tribes.
The period from 1640 until the Pucblo Revolt of 1680 was one
marked by general peace between the Utes and the Spanish. This
peace and the ability of Utes to move over larger areas of land due
to their increased

use of the horse,

which

made

the Utes a much

stronger group to reckon with, encouraged the Spanish to present a
peace treaty to the Utes by the 1670’s. It was the first treaty made
with the Utes by a European people.
The peace treaty was apparently still in existence when the Pueblo
Revolt broke out, for the Southern Ute bands did not join the northern
Pucblo Indians in driving the Spanish out of New Mexico." During the
twelve years the Spanish were gone from the northern pueblos, the
Utes raided the puebios and other Indians located in the area. By the
time of the return of the Spanish to Taos in 1692 the Utes had gained
great respect among the tribes and pueblos of northern New Mexico.
The great respect of these Indians was also held by the Spaniard
who led the reconquest of New Mexico, Don Diego de Vargas. With
the securing of northern New Mexico under Spanish rule, Vargas
immediately renewed the contact with the Utes. They were invited to

* Schroeder, “Brief History” pp. 54-56.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

The Spanish Period

5

Santa Fe to trade as they had before the revolt.

Despite the Pueblo

Revolt and the absence of the Spanish for twelve years, the peace
treaty of 1670 with the Utes remained intact well into the 1700’s.
Around 1700, the Utes and their kinsmen, the Comanches, began
to raid the Pueblos for horses, agricultural products, and captives to be
held for ransom. The full force of Ute and Comanche attacks were
felt from 1696 to 1727 especially in the north central and northeastern
portions of New Mexico.

Spanish was broken.

In 1719, the peace between the Utes and the

Governor Valverde of New

Mexico carried on

an extensive campaign against them after a Council of War and opinions gathered from Spanish leaders in Santa Fe. That punitive expedition against the Utes and Comanches was largely unsuccessful and
the Spanish turned to developing peace with the Jicarilla Apaches who
would act as a buffer state.
From about 1650 the Apaches had been encroaching on Ute lands
and, by the time of the return of the Spanish, had settled in the Sierra
Blancas north of Taos and in northeast New Mexico.” Because the
Spanish offered some protection, the Utes were willing to form an
alliance with them. But when this alliance broke down, the Utes and
the Comanches began raiding the Jicarillas, burning rancherias and
capturing women and children to sell for ransom.
The Utes also formed an alliance with the Comanches, which
lasted intermittently from 1700 to 1746, to help apply pressure against
the encroaching Apache. So from about 1700 to 1750, relations among
the Utes, Comanches, Apaches and Spanish were confused, shifting
from warfare to alliance and back again. By the end of the UteComanche alliance, and one of the reasons for its ending, the Apaches
had been driven out of northeastern New Mexico and into an area
south and west of the Ute lands.
By 1748 the Comanches had become strong enough to turn on
their Ute allies and cause problems for the Spanish as well. To end
this problem the governor of New Mexico, Joachin de Coadallos y
Rabal, marched on both the Utes and Comanches and defeated them
in a battle above Abiquiu, New Mexico. After this a series of battles
between the Utes and the Spanish lasted for two years before the Utes
came to Taos to sue for peace with the Spanish. The Utes were finding
it too difficult to fight both the Spanish and the Comanches. They

9, Lyman Tyler, “The Spaniard and the Ute” Utah Historical Quarterly, XXII,
No. 4 (1954), 346.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

The Southern Utes

., SONNCYO
ONI

NIVWOd

N
SNNOMO

3HL

oniinnH

3Ln

(S3HOVNO3EVL)
FYOHVIWOONN

SYINY
ALHM
SANNOYO
ONILNNH

O'Neil, University of Utah

From the collection of FloydA

The Spanish Period

7

also needed the trade in horses that the Spanish could provide. In
1750 peace between the Utes and the Spanish was obtained."
Trading, trapping and exploration brought renewed interest in the
land north of Taos. With the peace of 1750 the Spanish were able to
re-establish Abiquiu as a point of departure to the north. From Abiquiu the Spanish were then able to send trading parties into the Ute
country to trade for the soft deerskins that the Utes were able to provide.

The Spanish also became interested in trapping the numerous

rivers of the Ute nation for fur bearing animals, a product that was in

great demand in Europe.

Finally, the Spanish were still interested in

the land of Copala and its potential wealth and locating an overland
route through that area to the West Coast.™
Almost immediately after Abiquiu had been re-established, trading parties were sent to trade with the Utes. In 1765 Juan Maria de

Rivera was sent across the San Juan River, below the southern end of
the La Plata Mountains, up the Dolores River and along the Uncompahgre Plateau to the Gunnison River to trade and trap for furs.
During the next ten years Rivera led three other expeditions into the
Ute lands.
Others who explored the region to the north of New Mexico were
Nicolas de La Fora in 1766-67, Pedro Mora with Gregorio Sandoval
and Andrés Muifiiz in 1775, and Fray Francisco Garcés in 1775-76.
Garcés, first assigned as resident minister at San Xavier del Bac
in 1768, traveled extensively for the next thirteen years in Sonora,
Arizona, and California as a missionary to the Indians. During this
time Garcés undertook five expeditions to the Indians, two to the Gila
River and one to the Colorado River, another to California and the
fifth, in 1775-76, from the junction of the Gila and Colorado rivers
to the mouth of the Colorado River and west to the San Gabriel mission in California through the land of the Mohaves and Chemehuevis.
He then returned to San Xavier del Bac through the Tulare Valley
back into the Mohave country to the Gila River.*
The Indians Garcés encountered on this fifth expedition were
mostly of the Yuman stock but these people had much to say about the
tribes surrounding them, among whom were the Utes. Garcés brought
10 Schroeder, “Brief History,” p. 59.
11 Tyler, “Spaniard and the Ute,” p. 347.
12 Tyler, “Before Escalante,” pp. 187-193.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

8

The Southern Utes

back to Santa Fe this information as well as the comment that more
and more of the Utes were willing to trade with the Spanish.
In addition to their interest in the Utes, the Spanish fathers were
looking for a land route to the Pacific Ocean where the new capital
of California had just been established at Monterey. A plan for locating the route was first conceived by Fray Silvestre Vélez de Escalante

when he was visiting the Hopis in 1775, and Escalante was greatly
encouraged to hear from Garcés that:

It is possible to proceed through the Yutas [Utes] and seek the Rio de
San Felipe, and down

the banks of this will be found my road [to Cali-

fornia]. I doubt not that there may open another, better, and shorter
than that which I traced.™

Escalante and Fray Atanasio Dominguez, the expedition leader,
chose the route through the Ute lands rather than risk encounters with
the unfriendly Navajos. The route was well known to the Spanish,
and guides were available who knew the Utes and their language and
had seen parts of their country.
Escalante’s trip into the interior of the Ute domain was the first
one that extended into the mythical land of Copala. He found the area
thought to be Copala poor and unproductive for the desires of the
Spanish. Neither gold nor silver were located, and they did not find
the route to Monterey. They did, however, explore much of the Ute
domain.
The route the expedition took led them up the valley of the Chama
River past Abiquiu to the site of Tierra Amarilla, thence to the place
where Pagosa Springs now stands. (Pagosa in Ute means hot water.)
After crossing the Dolores River below the San Juan Mountains the
party traveled to the Uncompahgre Platcau and down the Uncompahgre River to its confluence with the Gunnison. From this point
their route took the expedition along the western slope of the Rockies
to the White River in northern Colorado. At that point the group
turned west across Utah just south of the Uinta mountains to Utah
Lake. From there the group turned south through the southern
Paiute lands, to Zuni and then on to Santa Fe. Escalante was convinced this route offered a shorter, better method for reaching Monterey."
1% bid., p. 190.
* Ibid., pp. 198-200.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

The Spanish Period

9

Although Escalante failed to find the riches of the land of Copala,
his expedition was important for the exploration of country unknown
to the Spanish and for the locating of the Indian groups that lived in
the present day states of Colorado and Utah. This penetration into
Ute land marked the beginning of a new ecra for the Utes. No longer
was their land considered an unknown area. Now people would journey from Sante Fe far into the interior of the Ute domain to trade.
The Spanish felt a stronger tie to the Utes after Escalante’s expedition and continued to cultivate their friendship and alliance. In
1779, 200 Mouache Utes and Jicarilla Apaches joined Governor Juan
Bautista de Anza in a campaign against the Comanche who had been
raiding the settlements of New Mexico. A peace between the groups
was not established until 1786 when the Utes, the Comanches and the
Spanish met at Pecos. This alliance and past experiences caused the
Spanish to look to the Utes for assistance when either the Comanches
or the Navajos raided the Spanish settlements. In support of these
alliances a second peace treaty between the Utes and the Spanish was
signed in 1789.
The Navajos had caused trouble for both the Spanish and the
Utes for many years. Ute-Navajo relations varied according to the
need of both groups for protection from outside raiding groups. If
cither tribe was threatened by a group of Plains Indians an alliance was
struck. When this outside threat was not great, the two groups would
raid one another and compete for the land that was common to both
tribes. During these periods the Navajos often formed an alliance with
the Apaches or with a Pueblo tribe to raid the Utes, and the Utes
banded together with Plains groups such as the Comanche. At other
times the Spanish would form an alliance with the tes against the
Navajo to defend the Pueblo Indians of New Mexico. The treaty of
1789 was made by the Spanish with the Utes to insure this alliance
against the Navajos. At the same time, the Navajos and the Utes were
oying a period of good relations. It wasn’t until 1804 that history
records a campaign of an alliance of Mouache Utes, Jicarilla Apaches
and Spanish against the Navajos. As in the past the Utes remained
friendly to the Spaniards and acted as a check against raids by the
Navajo, Comanches, and Apaches.”
13 Schroeder, “Brief History,” pp. 61-63.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

10

The Southern Utes
Two years after the 1804 alliance, the first known citizen of the

newly created country of the United States of America arrived in San
Luis Valley, in the heart of Ute country. Zebulon Montgomery Pike’s
appearance marked the beginning of a new era for the Ute Indians.
Soon the Spanish with their trading expeditions sent into the Ute
domain would be replaced, first by Mexican traders and then by
American traders and trappers and later American settlers coming to
occupy the land.
The transition from Spanish to Mexican control of the Ute lands
went almost unnoticed by the Ute Indians. The pattern of trading
established by the Spanish and the amount of contact between the two
groups continued as before. The Spanish had been very careful to
create peaceful relations with the powerful Ute nation and the Mexicans continued the practice.

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

The Mexican Period:

1821-1848

The Mexican government was anxious to continue and even increase the trading with the Ute Indians. To encourage peace, the
Mexicans gave the Utes gifts throughout the 1820’s. This policy paid
off with the opening of the “Old Spanish Trail” which went through
much of the Ute domain. Mule trains were able to depart from Abiquiu, move up the Chama River to the San Juan River in Capote land,
and down the San Juan to Utah and on to Los Angeles without being
disturbed by the Utes.
The peacefulness of the 1820’s fell apart during the 1830’s, however, as the Southern Utes began to feel the pressure of the Mexicans.
Trading expeditions into the area had attracted people to the region,
and the Tierra Amarilla land grant was allotted in July, 1832. It
covered the region from the Rio Nutrias, an eastern tributary of the
Chama River, north to the Navajo River on the upper San Juan.
Later attempts were made to settle in the Conejos Valley, but a war
with the Navajos forced the settlers to withdraw. Again, in 1842 or
1843, another settlement attempt was made in the same valley but the
Mouache band drove the Mexicans off.
As the Mexicans encroached on Ute land, the Utes strengthened
their alliance with the Navajos against the Mexicans and other Indian
tribes who were being pushed off the plains into the Ute hunting
grounds. Both Utes and Navajos were raiding Mexican settlements
in northern New Mexico during the 1830’s and the 1840’s. As the rule
of the Mexican government came to an end in New Mexico, the
northern regions of that area experienced raids from all directions.
To the north the Mouache band was attacking on the east side of the
Sangre de Cristo mountains and the Capote band with the aid of the
Navajos was raiding in the Rio Arriba area.'
These raids worried the American officers who were occupying
New Mexico during the Mexican War. To end this worry a treaty was
signed between a band of Mouache Utes and the Americans. Signed
in 1846 the treaty offered protection for that area which lay east and
north of Taos, the area where these Utes lived. The treaty however
did little to stop the Ute raiding on other New Mexico settlements.
1 Albert H. Schroeder, “A Brief History of the Southern Utes,” Southwestern Lore,
XXX, No. 4 (1965), 63.

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

12

The Southern Utes

For several years after the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo (1848) which
gave New Mexico and part of Colorado to the United States, the raids
continued, much to the distress of the Americans.
During the Mexican period the Utes experienced little change
from the way the Spanish had treated them. Of the major events,
the opening of the Old Spanish Trail as a regular trading route was
foremost. For the most part the Southern Ute bands were able to
resist the efforts of the Mexicans to settle their region.
This was not to be the experience with the new invaders. The
Americans, already having explored the region while fur trapping,
were soon to come in increasing numbers and not leave as had both
the Spanish and the Mexicans.

CoLoRAO
NEW MEXCO

—_—
e
[——
anza
4 ESCALANTE -0OMINGUEZ
—
ARZE-GARCA

SOME

SPANISH EXPEDITIONS
TO UTE COUNTRY

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

Mountain Men and Fur Trappers
The Utes learned of the inhabitants of the United States in the
first half of the 19th century largely through the activities of the socalled mountain men or fur trappers. During that period, furs were
extremely valuable for making the felt hat which was fashionable for
gentlemen in the United States and Europe. The area occupied by
the Utes was very rich in beaver and those mountain men began to trap
every place where beaver “sign” occurred. Often called the “pathfinders” of the West, the mountain men were actually following game
trails and trails which had been known to the Utes for generations.
The first entrance of Anglo-Americans into Ute territory occurred
in 1806 when Lt. Zebulon Pike entered the San Luis Valley and built
a stockade on the Conejos River before being arrested by Spanish
authorities." In 1811, Ezekiel Williams was trapping for beaver pelts
in southwestern Colorado and the following year Robert McKnight
was in the same region. In 1816 and 1817, Auguste Pierre Chouteau
and Julius DeMunn moved into southwestern Colorado for the same

purpose.
In 1821, control of the southwestern portion of present day United
States passed from Spanish hands into the hands of authorities of
Mexico. Anglo-Americans found it much easier to deal with Mexican
authorities than with Spanish officials, because of the inflexibility of
Spanish law in an area so far removed from the seat of authority. So
in 1821 also, there began the famous Santa Fe trade between Independence, Missouri, and Santa Fe, New Mexico, and increased activity
in trapping throughout Ute territory. In the same year, Col. Hugh
Glenn and Jacob Fowler led a trapping expedition into the San Luis
Valley and possibly even into present Archuleta and Mineral counties.*
In 1824, William Becknell, “The Father of the Santa Fe Trade,” led
a party of trappers to the Green River and William Huddart headed
an expedition of fourteen men from Taos to the same area. Probably

* For a_ thorough explanation of this expedition led by Pike, with letters and related
documents, see Donald Jackson, ed., The Journals of Zebulon Pike, 2 vols., (Norman: Univ.
of Oklahoma Press, 1966) ; also, Elliott Coves, ed., The Expeditions of Zebulon Pike, 3 vols.,
(New York: Francis P. Harper, 1895). A more readable and recent account is W. Eugene
Hollon, The Lost Pathfinder: Zebulon Montgomery Pike, (Norman: Univ. of Oklahoma,
Press, 1949).
2D, H. Cummins, “Social and Economic History of Southwestern Colorado,” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in History, University of Texas, 1951), p. 188

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

The Southern Utes

14

both expeditions traveled along the western slope of the Rockies
through Ute country. At about the same time, Kit Carson and Jason
Lee left New Mexico and went to the Uinta River in Utah, where
In 1826, James Ohio Pattie passed
they met Antoine Robidoux.
through the present site of Grand Junction in Mesa County after
departing from Santa Fe, going south to the Gila River and following
that river to the Colorado River and then ascending that river into
Ute territory.”
In the 1830’s, beaver pelts became even more valuable and many
more fur trappers and traders entered Colorado and Utah. In 1830,
the “Old Spanish Trail” was established between Santa Fe and San
Gabriel, California. Mexicans from Santa Fe used this trail for several years and came into contact with most of the bands of the Utes,
whom they traded with for slaves and many articles which the Utes
possessed.
In 1832, Antoine Robidoux, a fur trader from St. Louis, Missouri, established Fort Uncompahgre, a fort and fur trading post just
below the junction of the Gunnison and Uncompahgre Rivers near the
present site of Delta, Colorado; and he later established a similar out-

fitting and trading post on the Uinta River in Utah." Philip Thompson and William Craig founded Fort Davy Crockett on the Green
River in 1837. None of these trading posts in Ute country prospered.
The Utes burned Fort Uncompahgre and about 1840 Fort Davy
Crockett was abandoned right after Kit Carson and James Baker had
headquartered there through the fall and winter of 1839-40. In 1842
Rufus Sage left Taos, passed through southwestern Colorado to the
post on the Uinta, probably passing along the old Ute trail through
Archuleta and LaPlata counties.
Thus the whole country of the Utes became known to AngloAmericans and the Utes became acquainted with their products. The
fur trappers and traders from the United States were generally on very
friendly terms with the Ute people. The Indians were willing to trade
buffalo robes and beaver pelts for flour, cloth, tobacco, trinkets, and

pp. 188-90,

4Floyd A. O'Neil and John D. Sylvester, eds., Ute People, An Historical Study
(Salt Lake City: Univ. of Utah Press, 1970), p. 7; John B. Lloyd, ““The Uncompahgre Utes,”
(unpublished Master’s thesis, Western State College of Colorado, 1932), pp. 2-3.
©LeRoy R. Hafen and Ann W. Hafen, eds., Rufus Sage: His Letters and Papers,
1836-1847, Vols. V and VI of the Far West and the Rockies Historical Series, (15 vols.
Clendale Arthur H. Clarke Co., 1995-61), V. 89-90; Cummins, “Social and Economic
istory,” p. 191
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

Mountain Men and Fur Trappers

15

even illegal whiskey. Buffalo robes and beaver pelts were readily sold
in the eastern part of the United States and in Europe. Most of the
trappers and traders had lived for long periods of time with Indian
groups and they were diplomats who could barter successfully, and
generally fairly, with the Utes. The Utes welcomed them into their
territory because they knew that they were not permanent settlers. The

take-over by the United States of all Ute lands occurred at the same
time as a drastic reduction in the value of furs because the French silk
hat replaced the felt hat formerly worn by gentlemen, and ladies began
to prefer sealskin coats to fur coats that the Rocky Mountains could
supply. Many of the trappers and traders, therefore, soon took employment as scouts for the United States Army and they were to prove
invaluable in dealing with the Indians of the West.
This is true partly because not the least of the contributions of the
Utes was the sharing of their knowledge regarding the topography of
the mountainous region they inhabited. After years as a food-gathering people, the Utes had thoroughly learned the paths of least resistance to travel — the lowest passes in the many chains of mountains
and the ridges which were easiest to cross. The friction of their feet
over centuries had cut deep trails along the most important routes of
travel. Where trails intersected or became difficult to follow in the
rocky terrain, the Utes were accustomed to build stone monuments in
prominent places eight to ten feet high with a stone on top pointing

out the right direction. Pioneers, road builders, and railroad builders
used these to a great advantage. A look at any map showing the transportation routes in Ute country will indicate to the casual observer the
trails formerly used extensively by the Utes in their travels.
In the late Mexican period, relations between the settlers in
New Mexico and the Utes were often unsettled and unfriendly. The
Utes, seeing their land holdings diminishing because of increased
ranching and farming periodically raided the scttlements for livestock
and other articles. A rising level of anger impelled the Utes to more
and more depredations. In 1846, the United States entered into a war
against Mexico, the result of which was going to be the incorporation
of all Ute territory into the United States. Thus the United States had
to begin dealing with the Utes as the Spanish and Mexican governments had to do before. Only two years before, Utes had created a
sensation in Santa Fe by threatening the governor of New Mexico in
the Palace of the Governors, an event well known to the Anglo AmeriFrom the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

16

The Southern Utes

cans. From then until the American take-over in 1846, the Mexican
government at Santa Fe generally was at war with the Utes, who,
mounted on good horses and with fircarms, raided the Taos Valley
and the frontier around Abiquiu.” The military leaders of the United
States, realizing that the Utes might possibly present a threat to their
lines of supply and communication, sent William Gilpin to confer with
the Utes in August, 1846, within a month after the conquest of New
Mexico. Gilpin encouraged sixty. Ute leaders to accompany him to
Santa Fe to confer with the military authorities there. These Ute
leaders were mainly from northern New Mexico and southern Colorado, especially from the San Luis Valley, and after a conference with
Col. Alexander W. Doniphan, they agreed to remain peaceful.”
On December 30, 1849, the first treaty between the Utes and the
United States was signed at Abiquiu, the frontier town on the Chama
River north of the town of Espanola. This treaty was arranged largely
by the great Indian agent, James S. Calhoun.* The Utes recognized
the sovereignty of the United States and agreed not to depart from
their accustomed territory without permission. The Utes also agreed
to perpetual peace and friendship with the United States, to abide by
United States law, and to permit citizens of the United States government to establish military posts and agencies in their country. Quiziachigiate signed as principal chief and twenty-seven other Utes signed
as subordinate chiefs.
After the twenty-cight Ute leaders expressed an “utter aversion
to labor,” Agent Calhoun promised that the United States would help
take care of the Utes to the amount of $5,000 per year.

No boundaries

of the Ute territory were defined in this treaty.”
The following year (1850) the United States government opened
an agency for the Utes at Taos, New Mexico. John Greiner was the
first agent (1851-53), but the United States failed to provide the necessary money and the agency had to close. It was reopened in December,
© Paul Horgan, Great River, 2 vols., (New York: Rinehart & Co., 1954), II, 717.
7 Wilson Rockwell, The Utes: A Forgotten People, (Denver: Sage Books, 1956), p. 64.

© James W. Covington, “Relations Between the Ute Indians and the United States
Government, 1848-1900" (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in History, University
of Oklahoma, 1949), pp. 25-6 passim.
9 For a complete treatment of Agent Calhoun, sec Annie Heloise Abel,
The
Official Correspondence of James S. Calhoun, while Indian Agent at Santa Fe anded.,Superintendent of Indians Affaiis in New Mexico (Washington: Government Printing Office,
1915). For the texts of treaties with In
Kappler, ed., Indian Affairs;
Laws and Treaties, (2 vols.; Washington: G
Office, 1903738) ; the Treaty
of 1849 with
the Utes is in I1, 585-86.

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

Mountain Men and Fur Trappers

17

1853, largely to serve the Capote band of Utes, and Kit Carson, the
famous trapper, mountain man and trader, who was a friend to the
Utes, was named agent."” He served in that capacity until 1859. The
Mouache band of Utes was also served at the Taos agency during the
time, but members of the Weeminuche band came there infrequently.
The Tabeguache band of Utes heard of rations being allotted to their
relatives and went to Taos in 1856. Kit Carson recommended that an
agency for the Tabeguache be set up closer to their country but his
request was not acted on by the United States for several years. Kit
Carson (1809-1868) was the best known of the fur trappers and
traders who had entered Ute territory. While a young man, he had
trapped for cight years in South Park and had become familiar with
practically every Ute trail and every pass in the mountains. He was
modest and amiable and the Indians generally considered him a worthwhile friend, especially since he had married Singing Grass, an
Arapaho, while very young, and at Taos, in 1843, had married Josefa
Jaramillo.
During the time that southern Colorado was claimed by Spain
(1598-1821) and by Mexico (1821-48), several land grants had been
awarded to Spanish or Mexican citizens in northern New Mexico and
southern Colorado in the traditional lands of the Utes. The United
States agreed to respect these land grants by terms of the Treaty of
Guadalupe-Hidalgo (1848) which ended the war with Mexico. They
had been granted by the Spanish and Mexican governments to petitioners who agreed to develop the land and to protect the frontier.
Many of the land grants adversely affected different bands of Utes.
For example, the very large and famous Maxwell Land Grant of over
one and one-half million acres in the northeastern portion of New
Mexico and southeastern Colorado included some former Ute holdings; the San Joaquin del Cafion del Rio de Chama Grant had given
land to settlers near Abiquiu, as did the Cafion de San Miguel (Pedernales) Grant; in the arca of present day Colorado, the Las Animas
Grant embraced the land south of the Arkansas River to the Sangre
de Cristos between the Huerfano and Purgatory Rivers (Ceran St.
Vrain and Cornelio Vigil) ; the Sangre de Cristo Grant covered a large
area in the lower San Luis Valley; the Conejos Grant took away from
the Utes the western portion of the San Luis Valley; and the Tierra
10 Covington, “The Ute Indians and the United States,” pp. 29-33.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

The Southern Utes

18

Luis Maria Baca

Vigil & St. Vrain

Sangre de

NEW MEXICO

Tierra
Amarilla

¢
F Fe
oSanta

Las Vegas

SPANISH-MEXICAN

LAND

GRANTS

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

Mountain Men and Fur Trappers

19

Amarilla Grant extended from that town into southern Colorado. Although never heavily populated by Europeans, these grants by the
Spanish and Mexican governments began the crosion of the land base
of the Utes and led to continuous friction.”
Between 1851 and 1853, towns were founded in the San Luis Val-

ley (San Luis, San Pedro, and San Acacia) by former Mexican citizens.”® As usual with the influx of settlers, livestock was introduced and
the supply of game animals began to diminish or to move to more
inaccessible places in the mountains. Also it was much easier for the
Utes to raid for livestock than to hunt game in those higher altitudes.
Bad blood increased between the Utes and the settlers and the usual
pattern of raid followed by punitive expedition was established in
southern Colorado.
To safeguard the settlers and to keep the Utes from raiding, the
United States government established Fort Massachusetts on Ute
Creek near the base of Mt. Blanca. (Six years later that military post
was moved six miles south and renamed Fort Garland.)*
The Utes did not like either the military post in the midst of their
territory or the presence of the settlers, whose farming and ranching
began to drive out the game upon which the Utes depended for part of
their food supply. Their resentment flared in the Ute War of 1854-55.
On Christmas day of 1854, the Utes attacked Fort Pueblo on the
Arkansas River and killed all of the inhabitants." Then they began
attacking the settlements in the San Luis Valley. Several settlers were
killed and their livestock driven away. Fort Massachusetts was severely
threatened. General Garland at Santa Fe was notified and he quickly
organized six companies of mounted volunteers from New Mexico plus
some units of regular troops and sent them to Fort Massachusetts
to put down the Ute revolt. Col. Thomas T. Fauntleroy was placed in
command and Kit Carson accompanied the expedition as head scout.
The leader of the Utes was Chief Tierra Blanca who was easily
recognized because of the red shirt which he wore. The United States
troops made their first contact with the Utes near the present town of
Salida, in the Saguache Valley, in the middle of March, 1855. The
Utes, recognizing the superior fire power of the United States troops,
11 Cummins, “Social and Economic History,” pp. 186-87; LeRoy R. Hafen, “Mexican Land Grants in Colorado,” Colorado Magazine, 1V, No. 3 (1927), 81-93,

12 Cummins, “Social and Economic History,” p. 187; Rockwell, The Utes, p. 65.
1 Cummins, “Social and Economic History,” p. 187
14 Lloyd, “The Uncompaghre Utes,” p. 7.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

The Southern Utes

20

retreated in a running fight toward Cochetopa Pass and most of that
band escaped.

However,

another band of Utes was surprised near

Salida. About forty of them were killed and some livestock recovered
on April 19, 1855. Throughout the remainder of April and for the
next two months, running battles and skirmishes occurred, but the Utes
recognized that they could not continue to fight the forces of the United
States and asked for peace. A meeting was held at Abiquiu, mainly
with the Capote Utes, and a treaty of pcace was arranged in the fall

of 1855.°
Also in 1855, a treaty was negotiated with the Mouaches at
Abiquiu. Had that treaty been ratified by the United States Senate,
the Mouaches would have been placed on a reservation of 1000 square
miles in the extreme northern part of the Territory of New Mexico
with the Rio Grande as the castern boundary and the mountains between the drainages of the Rio Grande and the San Juan River as
the western boundary.™
Even before the Ute War, some Anglo-Americans were active in
the lands of the Utes. In 1848, John C. Fremont attempted to cross
the San Juan Mountains to find a suitable route for a transcontinental
railroad. Many of his party met disaster near La Garita before being
rescued by former mountain men from Taos. In 1853, Captain John
W. Gunnison was ordered by Secretary of War Jefferson Davis to survey the most practicable route for a transcontinental railroad. The
huge party which accompanied Captain Gunnison explored and
mapped Ute territory to a greater extent than ever before. Captain
Gunnison was killed by the Utes in western Utah, but Lt. E. G. Beckwith continued in command and wrote an account of the expedition.
Both Captain Gunnison and Lt. Beckwith were of the opinion that
the Ute lands west of San Luis Valley were of no value for settlement
of Anglo-Americans.”’ However, less than five years later, gold was
discovered near the present location of Denver and the “Rush to the
Rockies” was on. Thousands of Anglo-Americans from the Missouri
and the Mississippi Valleys with “Pike’s Peak or Bust” painted on the
canvas of their wagons poured into the area of Colorado. Many re-

67-8; Covington,
15 Rockwell, The Utes, pp. 65-6; Schroeder, “Brief History,” pp. “The
Fort Pueblo
“The Ute Indians and the United States,” pp. 35-42; LeRoy R. Hafen,
Massacre and the Punitive Expedition Against the Utes,” Colorado Magazine, IV, (March
1927), 49-58.
36 Cummins, “Social and Economic History,” pp. 311-12.
17 Rockwell, The Utes, pp. 66-68.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

Mountain Men and Fur Trappers

21

turned with “Busted by God” on their wagons, but enough remained to

organize the Territory of Colorado in 1861. The governor of the territory, William Gilpin, appointed by the president, was named to be
Superintendent of Indian Affairs within the territory. Thus, by 1861,
the Utes came under the control of the governors of the territories of
Colorado, Utah, and New Mexico.
In 1861, an agency was opened at Conejos, Colorado, under Agent
Lafayette Head for the Tabeguache Utes, but he was hampered by lack
of funds.” The agency at Taos continued to operate for the Capotes,
Mouaches, and Weeminuches, and by 1863, the Hot Sulphur Springs
agency was opened to serve the Northern Utes. As throughout the history of the United States, the migration of miners and settlers into a
new region caused trouble between them and the Indians accustomed
to hunt and gather food. The white scttlers could not understand why
the Indians should need so much land, and the Indians regarded the
newcomers as interlopers and trespassers. Because of the friction which
was developing in Colorado, a conference was held at the agency in
Conejos on October 1, 1863. The representatives of all the Ute bands
were to have been at the conference. However, the Northern Utes
sent insufficient representation.
The United States was represented at the conference by Simeon
Whiteley, agent for the Northern Utes from Hot Sulphur Springs;
Lafayette Head, agent for the Tabeguaches at Conejos; Michael Steck,
superintendent of the Southern Ute agency at Taos; John Evans, governor of the Territory of Colorado; and John Nicolay, secretary to
President Abraham Lincoln, from Washington, D.C. Mr. Nicolay
served as secretary of this commission, whose aim was to move the Utes

out of the path of the miners and settlers. Since the Northern Utes
were not well represented, the commission dealt only with the Tabeguache Utes and the Mouache band of Southern Utes. The Tabeguache refused to be moved to a new location but did agree to a treaty
which defined the boundaries of a reservation for them and the
Mouaches. Ten Tabeguache leaders, including Ouray, signed this
treaty by which they gave up claim to much land already occupied by
white settlers in return for promises of livestock and goods for the next
ten years."”
18 Ibid., pp. 68-9.
19 Ibid.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

22

The Southern Utes

The United States government failed to provide the Tabeguache
with any of the goods promised in the treaty and the Tabeguache continued to live in their accustomed places. In 1864, heavy snows prevented them from hunting buffalo in the plains and foothills for their
winter supply of meat, and the Tabeguaches were reduced to begging
around Colorado City. This caused friction with the white people, and
more developed in the San Luis Valley between the Utes and the
settlers there. The United States government determined to settle the
Ute question and remove them, esepecially from the San Luis Valley.
To accomplish this, a treaty was negotiated on March 2, 1868, at

Washington, D.C. The United States was represented by Governor
A. C. Hunt for the Territory of Colorado, N. G. Taylor, and Kit Carson. The seven bands of Utes who sent representatives were the
Tabeguache, Mouache, Capote, Weeminuche, Yampa, Grand River

and Uintah.*
By this treaty, a single reservation was provided for all the Ute
bands and the area comprised roughly the western one-third of
Colorado. An agency for the three bands of Northern Utes was to be
established on the White River near the present town of Meeker,
Colorado. Another agency was to be established on the Los Pinos River
for the Tabeguaches, Mouaches, Capotes, and Weeminuches. Education, clothing, and rations were to be provided by the United States
until the Utes should be capable of supporting themselves. The Utes
were assured that this reservation would forever be theirs and they
would be protected from white trespassers. This treaty was signed by
the ten Ute leaders and it was at this time that Ouray was selected
by the United States to be spokesman for the Utes instead of Colorow
or another headsman whom the Northern Utes preferred.
It appeared that the Treaty of 1868 would settle the “Ute problem,” but such was not the case. The Tabeguache band started to go
to the Los Pinos River, but they refused to go further when they arrived
at a branch of Cochetopa Creck about sixty miles to the north and

about fifty-five miles west of Saguache, Colorado.”” This spot was not
even on the specified reservation but the United States set up the Los
Pinos agency there, naming the tributary of Cochetopa Creek “Los
Pinos” to comply with the letter of the treaty, which had meant the

0 The Ute Treaty of 1868 is in Kappler, Latws and Treaties, 11, p. 990; Rockwell,
pp. 72-82.
Utes,
The
#1 Rockwell, The Utes, pp. 71-81.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

Mountain Men and Fur Trappers

23

Rio de Los Pinos, the tributary of Las Animas River in present day
La Plata County, named by the Spaniards in the eighteenth century.
Also, almost immediately after the treaty was negotiated, it was discovered that the San Juan Mountains of southwestern Colorado held
huge treasures of rich minerals.*
Actually, a third agency was maintained at Denver from 1871 to
1876 for the Utes of that area. During those years, the Utes still hunted
buffalo there for the winter supply of meat and sold hides and other
products to merchants. By the time that Colorado became a state of
the Union in 1876, the huge herds of buffalo had been largely eliminated from the plains and the Utes around Denver had no products to
sell and no more money to buy goods from the merchants. Soon their
presence in the capital city became a source of friction and trouble.”
By the Act of April 10, 1869, Congress paved the way for President Grant to end all troubles with Indians by settling the remaining
Indians on reservations deemed large enough to support them if they
engaged in agriculture.

22 Robert W. Delaney, “The Southern Utes a Century Ago,” Utah Historical Quarterly, XXXIX, No. 2 (1971), 124, citing the report of W. F. M. Arny of 1870.

#3 Ibid.,p. 81.

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

24

The Southern Uses

Los_pinos
@)

'—

NY3ILSIM

M ()

NOILVAY3S3Y

@

ot

ODIX3IW_M3N
0aVI010D

.

a

@
@

31N

%

7/ g

oo

NY3HLNOS

B

2,

?

W

&N

%@

o

O'Neil, University of Utah

From the collection of FloydA

The Southern Utes

90

SININIOTIV
SANVT Tvadl

NOILVAY3S3Y
NVIANI 31N
NY3LSVv3

@
o

_M3N

._on_<mo._ou "

ODIXIN

NY3IHLNOS

\\\\\\\.1\\\.1%_“%\\\\\\\\\\

0

O'Neil, Universi ity of Utah

From the collection of FloydA

A Chronology of Ute History
Shoshonean speaking peoples separate from other Uto-Aztecan groups
about the beginning of the Christian era.
1000 a.p. Great migration of Indians into the present-day United States.
1ap.

1150c.

1150

1200

Southern Paiutes move into southern Nevada, southwestern Utah, and
northern Arizona.

During the 12th century, Yuman and Pucblo type cultures began to be
replaced by a Shoshonean pattern.
Anasazis began movement into sandstone caves possibly for defense
)
against ancestors of the Utes, Navajos, and Apaches.

1276

Anasazis began movement out of Mesa Verde and other elaborate habi-

1492

Europeans start maintenance of continuous contact with the Americas.

153640
1598
1605
1626c.
1626
1637

tations possibly because of pressure from ancestors of the Utes.

Cabeza de Vaca, Esteban, Marcos de Niza enter the Southwest and lead
to the military expedition of Coronado in 1540. Although these did not
touch Ute lands, undoubtedly the Utes learned of the penetration of
these Europeans from their neighbors to the south.
New Mexico is scttled by the Spanish. Pucblo groups are christianized.
Spanish products begin to be traded to the Utes.
Earliest historical reference to the Paiutes, from an exploratory expedition under Juan de Ofiate.
Traditional Ute-Hopi conflicts began about this time and reached their
high point about the time of the Pueblo Revolt of 1680.
Earliest reference to the Utes by the Spanish.
First known conflict between Spanish and Utes. Spaniards under Luis
de Rosas, Governor of New Mexico 163741, captured about 80 Utacas
and forced them into labor work-shops in Santa Fe.

1670

First treaty between Utes and Spaniards.

1680

Pueblo Revolt and Spanish forced to move out of New

1692

1700¢c.
1706
1716
1720
1724
1730-50
1746

years.

Mexico for 12

Alliance between Paiutes, Apaches, and Hopis, to counter Spanish

aggression and expansion.
Beginnings of raids upon Pucblos and Spanish in New Mexico by Utes,
Apaches, and Comanches often working in concert.
Expedition of Juan de Ulibarri through southeastern Colorado.
Spanish campaign against Utes and Comanches not successful in preventing raids.
Expedition of Pedro de Villasur.
Expedition of Bourgmont.
Utes continue raids upon settlements in New Mexico. In 1747, Ute
forays caused the abandonment of the frontier town of Abiquiu. It was
reoccupied in 1748 by the Spaniards.
Spanish defeat a combination of Utes and Comanches above Abiquiu.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

92

1747
1752¢.
1754
1754
1760’s
1765

The Southern Utes

Spanish carry on a campaign against the Capote Utes.
Ute leaders, Chiquito, Don Tomas, and Barrigon meet with the governor of New Mexico. Spanish indicate a desire to cultivate trade with
the Utes especially for deerskins and to avoid a confrontation with the
Mouache, Capotes, and Chaguaguas.
By this time, the Utes have driven out the Navajos in the upper San
Juan drainage.
Mouache Utes enter an alliance with the Jicarilla Apaches.
Spanish-Ute relations friendly enough to permit Spanish trading ventures into Ute territory as far north as the Gunnison River.
Juan Maria de Rivera leads first official Spanish expedition into south-

western Colorado through lands of the Utes.
1770’

1775
1776
1778

Utes and Navajos at war with the Hopis.

Second expedition into southwestern Colorado led by Rivera.
Dominguez-Escalante expedition through Ute territory. Lands of the
Utes mapped by Miera y Pacheco.
Spanish law prohibits Spaniards and Christianized Indians from trading
with the Utes.

The ban was largely ineffectual since some traders con-

tinued to visit the Utes.
1779

1786

Mouache

Utes

and

Jicarilla

Apaches

joined

New

Mexico

Governor

Juan Bautista de Anza in a campaign against the Comanches,

Coman-

che forces under Cuerno Verde were defeated.

Utes represented by Chiefs Moara and Pinto protest the proposed peace
treaty between the Comanches and the Spanish. However, at the insistence of Juan Bautista de Anza, they finally agreed.

1789

Peace negotiations

were carried on at Pecos between the Mouache Utes, the Comanches,
and the Spanish and a treaty was concluded.
Treaty of peace between the Spanish and Utes and promise of Ute aid
against the Comanches and Navajos. At this time also, the Spanish took
precautions against an alliance between the Mouache Utes and the

1801
180+
1806

Lipan Apaches.
The Spanish begin to use Mouache Utes as spies to gather intelligence
on the Plains Indians.

Utes and Jicarilla Apaches joined the Spanish in a campaign against
the Navajos.
Battle near Taos between about 400 Mouache Utes and an equal number of Comanches.

Lt. Zebulon

intrusion into Ute territory.
under Pike to Santa Fe.

Pike represents first Anglo-American

Two

Mouache

Utes conduct a surgeon

1806-26
1809

Several Spanish and Mexican trading expeditions went into Ute lands.
About 600 Mouache Utes and some Jicarilla Apaches were attacked on

1811-12

Mocha and EI Albo.
Ezekiel Williams was

the Arkansas River by Comanches, Cuampes, and Kiowas. Killed were
the major Mouache chief, Delgadito, along with the other leaders, Mano
trapping

in southwestern

Colorado.

Robert McKnight was also trapping in the lands of the Utes.
From the collection of FloydA

In

1812,

O'Neil, University of Utah

93

A Chronology of Ute History
1813
181617

Arze-Garcia expedition through Ute lands.
Chouteau and De Munn trapping in southwestern Colorado.

1821

Independence of Mexico from Spain did not change the relations between the Utes and the settlements in New Mexico.
Beginning of the Santa Fe trade.

1821

1821
1822
1824

Col. Glenn and Jacob Fowler into southwestern Colorado on a trapping
and trading expedition.
Lechat, a Ute leader, proposed trade with the Americans but little was
done immediately.

William Becknell, the “Father of the Santa Fe trade,” led a party of
trappers and traders to the Green River and William Huddard led a

party of 14 from Taos to the same area.

At about the same time, Kit

Carson and Jason Lee followed an old Spanish trail north and met

1826
1829-30
1832

1837

Antoine Robidoux at the mouth of the Uinta River in Utah.

James Ohio Pattie passed through the present site of Grand Junction
in Mesa County.

Opening of the Old Spanish Trail from Santa Fe to San Gabriel, Cali-

fornia, partly through Ute territory.
Bent's Fort established in southeastern Colorado.

Philip Thompson and William Craig established a trading post (Fort
Davy Crockett) on the Green River. (It was abandoned about 1840).
At about

the same

time, Antoine Robidoux

established Fort Uncom-

pahgre at the junction of the Uncompahgre and Gunnison Rivers.

1840’s

Constant attacks

by the Utes on settlements in the Taos

Valley and

the arca of New Mexico north of Espafiola. Scveral land grants began
to erode the Ute land base.

1842

Rufus Sage left Taos and went to the Uintah River.

Marcus Whitman

was in western Colorado and stopped at the post established by Robi-

1844

doux.
Capote attack on Rio Arriba settlements after the altercation between
the Utes and the Governor of New Mexico in Santa Fe.
Birth of Ignacio, a leader of the Weeminuches.

1844

John C. Fremont passed through Ute country.

1845

Capote Utes attacked the settlement of Ojo Caliente.

1846
1846
1849

The Utes agreed to remain peaceful after 60 Ute leaders were induced by
William Gilpin to go to Santa Fe and confer with Col. Doniphan.
Fremont's attempt to cross Colorado in winter ended in disaster.
First treaty between Utes and the United States at Abiquiu. Chief

1850

The Utes began to obtain arms from the Mormons at Salt Lake.

1844

1850
1851

Quiziachigiate, a Capote, signed as principal chief and 28 other Utes
signed as subordinate chiefs.

An agency was opened for the Utes at Taos. It was soon closed for
lack of funds.
Mouache Utes were attacked near Red River by Kiowas and Arapahos.
The Utes retreated to Ojo Caliente.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

The Southern Utes

94
1851-53

Settlements by former

Mexican

citizens began to be made

in the San

Luis Valley. Livestock activities and farming began to disrupt the lifestyle of the Utes.

1852

The

U.S.

Government

established

Fort

Blanca to protect and control the Utes.

Massachusetts

near

Mount

Six years later the post was

moved six miles and became Fort Garland.

1853
1853

Arapahos and Cheyennes raided the camp of Utes under Tochoaca.
Agency reopened at Taos and Kit Carson was agent 1833-59.

1853

Captain Gunnison killed near Sevier Lake in Utah. His expedition continued under Lt. Beckwith.
An Indian Agent reports war between Mouache Utes and other Indians

1853

1853

1854-55

along the Arkansas River caused by the scarcity of game. The agent
requested the U.S. Government to prevent other Indians from encroaching on Mouache lands.

Rations were being distributed to the Mouaches at Arroyo Hondo and
Red River and to the Capotes on the Chama River.

Ute War started by an attack by Utes on Fort Pueblo. The Utes were

mainly Mouaches under the leadership of Chief Tierra Blanca.

Several

skirmishes resulted in the Indians suing for peace. From that time on,
the Utes have been generally on friendly terms with the U.S. Govern-

ment.

1855

In early summer, a treaty was concluded with the Capotes and one with
the Mouaches in August. These were not ratified by the U.S.

1856

Mouache chief Cany Attle claimed the San Luis Valley.

1856

Kit Carson recommended that an agency be set up for the Tabeguache

1857

Utes. This was not done.
Cany Attle claimed the Conejos Valley.

1857
1858

1858

1859

Officials recommended that the Capotes and Jicarilla Apaches be re-

moved to the San Juan River and assisted in becoming self-sufficient.
Tabeguache Utes considered to be a band attached to the agency at
Abiquiu. They were also considered to be the largest band of Utes in
that year.
Hostilities between the Utes and Navajos.

Temuche, a Capote chief, took presents to a Navajo camp (Kiatano’s)
to maintain friendly relations.

1860
1860-61

Utes join U.S. troops in campaigns against Navajos.
Tabeguache Utes placed under Denver Agency; Mouaches attached to
sub-agency at Cimarron on Maxwell's Ranch; Capotes continued to
be served at Abiquiu;

Weeminuches were handled at Tierra Amarilla.

1861

(Jicarilla were also served at Cimarron) .
Agency for the Tabeguache Utes established at Conejos; Lafayette Head

1868

‘was the first agent.
Treaty with the Utes and a reservation created for them consisting of

approximately the western one-third of Colorado. Ouray selected as
principal chicf.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

95

A Chronology of Ute History
1870

Weeminuches object to removal to Reservation in Colorado. Cabeza
Blanca was one of the principal leaders of the Weeminuches at that
time.

1870

Arny’s census of 1870 showed that there were 365 Capotes largely under

1871-76

the leadership of Sobotar.

Agency maintained at Denver for Utes who continued to hunt buffalo
on the plains. Movement of silver and gold miners into the San Juan

1873
1873

Mountains.
Mouaches conclude a treaty at Cimarron.
The Utes cede the San Juan Mountain

1874

President U.S. Grant signs Brunot Agreement.

1877

Establishment

1878

Capotes and Weeminuches cede rights to the 1868 reservation.

1878

Fort Lewis established at Pagosa Springs to protect and control the

1879

Southern Utes.
Meeker Incident
Colorado.

1880-81
1880

Agreement.

of the Southern

area by terms of the Brunot

Ute Agency

Capotes, Mouaches, and Weeminuches.

at Ignacio

results in cries for the removal

to serve the

of the

Utes

from

Fort Lewis moved to the site near Hesperus, Colorado, on Southern Ute
Reservation.
Death of Ouray.

1880
1881

Ute Agreement signed.
Tabeguache and White River Utes moved to the Uintah Reservation

1881
1886

in Utah.
Denver and Rio Grande Railroad went through Southern Ute land.
Consolidation of the Uintah and Ouray Reservations for the Northern
Utes.

1888

Utes agree to move to San Juan County, Utah.

agreement.

Congress fails to ratify

1891

Fort Lewis deactivated as a military post and became an Indian school.

1894
1895

Ute allotment bill presented to Congress.
Ignacio led most of the Weeminuche to the western part of the Southern
Ute Reservation in protest against the government’s policy of land

allotment.
1895

Utes agree to the allotment bill.

1896

New agency set up at Navajo Springs to serve the Weeminuche who did

1896

not want to accept land in severalty.
Allotments are distributed to Southern Utes.

1899

Southern Ute Reservation opened to Anglo settlement.

1913
1918
1924
1925

Death of Ignacio.
Consolidated Ute Indian Reservation established.
American Indians become United States citizens.
Reburial of Ouray.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

96

The Southern Utes

1931

Distribution of rations from Federal Government stopped.

1936

Death of Buckskin Charlie at the age of 96. He was succeeded by
Antonio Buck.
Establishment of a Tribal Council in accordance with the WheelerHoward or Indian Reorganization Act of 1934.
Restoration Act returns 222,016 acres to the Southern Utes.
Restoration Act returns 30,000 acres to the Ute Mountain Utes,
Settlement with U.S. Government for Ute land.

193¢

1936
1937
1938
1953

1954
1961
1966
1972

Passage of the Indian Reorganization Act by Congress (commonly
called the Wheeler-Howard Act).

Ute Rehabilitation Program.
Antonio Buck, Sr., last hereditary chief, died.
Community Action Program started on reservation.
Opening of Pino Nuche Purasa, the motel estaurant-community building complex, by the Southern Utes at Ignac

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

Ute Leaders
Don Thomas
Chiquito
Burrigon
Moara
Pinto
Cuerno Verde
Mano Mocha
Delgadito
El Albo
Coyote
Cuerna
Ancha

Capote
Mouache
Chaguaguas
Ute (Mouache)
Ute (Mouache)
Comanche
Mouache (Major chief)
Mouache
Mouache
Mouache
Mouache
Mouache

. 1752
. 1752
€. 1752
. 1786
. 1786
. 1779
c. 1809
c. 1809
c. 1809
c. 1809
c. 1809
c. 1809

Lechat
Montoya
Quiziachigiate
Tamuche
Cuniache

Ute (Mouache?)
?
Capote
Capote
Mouache

c.1822
c.1847
c. 1850
c. 1852
c. 1852

Amparia

Mouache

Dientecito

Tachoaca
Aohkasach
Coneache
Augkapowerbran
Insagrapouyah
Wahka
Chuwoopah
Cany Attle (Coniachi?)
Ouray
Peersichopa (headman)
Cabegon
Sewormicha
Piwood
Ignacio
Chiwaten
Tobatas
Cabeza Blanca
Sobata (Sobotar)
Kaneache
Captain Jack

Mouache

&

Mouache
Capote
Mouache
Tabeguache
Sevarit
Timpanogo
Paiute
Mouache
Tabeguache
Paiute or Weeminuche
Paiute or Weeminuche
Paiute or Weeminuche
Paiute or Weeminuche
Paiute or Weeminuche
Paiute or Weeminuche
Paiute or Weeminuche
Weeminuche
Capote
Ute leader
White River

From the collection of FloydA

c. 1809

c. 1850

c.1853
c. 1850
c. 1850
c. 1850
c. 1850
c. 1850
c. 1850
1856
1868
1869
1869
1869
1869
1869
1869
1869
1870's
1870
1881
18827

O'Neil, University of Utah

98

The Southern Utes

Chief Douglas
Colorow

White River
White River

Piah

1885
1888
1888

Ute leader
Capote
Capote
Weeminuche
Weeminuche

Chicf Shavano
Buckskin Charlie
Antonio Buck
Ignacio
Jack House

1971

Southern Ute Tribal Chairmen
Name

Term

Antonio Buck

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

1936-1939

Julius Cloud

.

.

.

.

)

.

.

.

.

1939-1948

Sam Burch

8

%

¥

5

.

5

i

¥

§

1948-1950

Julius Cloud

.

s

.

.

.

v

&

.

.

1950-1952

Sam Burch

S

John E. Baker, Sr.
Anthony Burch

1952-1956

...
...

John E. Baker, Sr.

...
...

...

.

...

John S. Williams

.

.

.

.

.

.

Leonard C. Burch

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

1956-1960

.

1960-1961

.

1961-1962

.

1962-1965

.

1966-1972

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

Essay on the Sources
Because of the small size of the tribes of American Indians, the
source material relating to each is relatively small, except in some
unusual cases such as the Cherokee, Sioux, or Navajo. The greater
part of the literature which is available is anthropological or episodical in nature. The historical literature deals mostly with wars or
bizarre incidents.
The Ute ethnic community is a small one. After a recent period
of strenuous

growth,

the Southern

Utes now

number

less than 900

people. With their neighboring relatives the Ute Mountain Utes and
the Uintah-Ouray Utes, they comprise a total population of only 4200.
In spite of their numbers, the documents relating to them are relatively extensive. This is due in part to the attention of scholars, but is
mainly owing to the records of their administration by the Federal government. Therefore, the largest body of material consists primarily of
records in the possession of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the
National Archives and Records Service.
Some secondary works are worthy of mention. Wilson Rockwell’s
The Utes, A Forgotten People, published in 1956, Denver, Sage Books,
is spotty and episodical, but very useful. Robert Emmitt, The Last
War Trial: The Utes and the Settlement of Colorado, University of
Oklahoma Press, 1954, is somewhat poetic in its treatment, but of
value, nonetheless. The book of Marshall Sprague, Massacre: The
Tragedy at White River, 1st ed., Boston: Little, Brown, 1957, deals
largely with the Meeker Affair of 1879 and the expulsion of the Utes
from Colorado. For Southern Ute history, it has limited value. The
same can be said of Ute People: An Historical Study, compiled by
'June Lyman and Norma Denver, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1970, because
its orientation is largely to the Utes of the Uintah-Ouray Reservation.
Some sections are useful to provide background for Southern Ute
history.
Several M.A. theses and doctoral dissertations have proved valuable. Foremost among these is S. Lyman Tyler’s “Before Escalante, an
Early History of the Yuta Indians and the Area North of Mexico . . .,”
unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of History, University of
Utah, 1951. This work is essential to the understanding of early
Southern Ute history, and it remains a landmark which can be used as

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

100

The Southern Utes

a model for research with other tribes of the southwestern part of the
United States. For the period following the Treaty of GuadalupeHidalgo,

the

1949

unpublished

Ph.D.

dissertation of James

Warren

Covington, “Federal Relations Between Ute Indians and the United
States Government, 1848-1900,” Department of History, University

of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, gives a good outline of events.
Although this dissertation includes the other bands of Utes as well as
those resident on the Southern Ute Reservation, it is still an excellent
work which must be consulted for information on the Southern Utes.
An additional unpublished dissertation which is useful and shows
painstaking research is that of D. H. Cummins, “Social and Economic
History of Southwestern Colorado,” Department of History, University
of Texas, 1951. Cummins is perhaps better in his description of the
settlement by Anglo-Americans than he is in his handling of the history
of the Ute Indians.
An important Master’s thesis in Southern Ute history is that of
Gregory C. Thompson, “Southern Ute Lands, 1848-1899: The Creation of a Reservation,” unpublished Master’s thesis in History, University of Utah, 1971. This thesis surpasses any other work in demonstrating the forces imposing the changes upon the Southern Ute
people.
A local work which has merit is Helen Sloan Daniels’ “The Ute
Indians of Southwestern Colorado,” 1941 (mimeographed). This
compilation of source materials and examples of life styles and traits
furthers the study of the Southern Utes. However, copies are difficult
to obtain and inquiries should be addressed to the Durango Public
Library, Durango, Colorado.
A plethora of other theses and research papers are available. They
are of differing value, and following are listed some which will be of
use in varying aspects:
Iden, Thomas

L.

“A History of the Ute Indian

Cessions of Colorado.”

Unpub-

lished Master’s thesis, Western State College, Gunnison, Colorado, 1929.
Jorgensen, Joseph G. “Ethnohistory and the Acculturation of the Northern Ute.”
Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Indiana, 1964.
Lawrence, Elcanor. “Trade in Spanish Horses on the Anglo-Spanish Border in
North America.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California,
Berkeley, 1931.
Lioy ohn B. “The Uncompahgre Utes.” Unpublished Master’s thesis, Western
State College, Gunnison, Colorado, 1932.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

Essay on the Sources

101

Opler, Marvin Kaufmann. “The Southern Ute of Colorado,” Ph.D. dissertation,
1940, Columbia

University.

Pub:

Linton, Acculturation

in Seven

American

Indian Tribes. New York: Appleton-Century Co., 1940, pp. 119-203.
Richie, Eleanor L. “Spanish Relations with Yuta Indians, 16801822 Unpublished Master’s thesis, Denver University, 1932,
Spiva, Agnes Elizabeth. “The Utes in Colorado, 1863-1880.” Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Colorado, 1929,
Zingg, Robert M. “A Reconstruction of the Uta-Aztekan History.” Unpublished
Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, 1933.
Many useful articles are available. They are listed in the alphabetical order according to the author rather than in order of importance:

Ayres, Mary C. “History of Fort Lewis, Colorado,” Colorado Magazine, VIIL.
1931.
Barber, Edwin A. “Language and Utensils of the Modern Utes,” Bulletin of the
U.S. Geol. and Geog. Survey of the Terr., 11, 1876, pp. 71-6.
Borland, Lois. “The Sale of the San Juan,” Colorado Magazine, April, 1951.
Casey, Pearle R. “Buckskin Charley, Chief of the Utes,” Southwestern Lore, IV,
1938.
Clarke, A. K. “A Visit with Piah,” Colorado Magazine, August, 1928.
Clifton, James A. “The Southern Ute Tribe as a Fixed Membership Group,”
Human Organization, Society for Applied Anthropology, vol. 24, no. 4, 1965,
pp. 319-327.
Colton, Harold Sellers. “Prehistoric Trade in the Southwest,” Scientific Monthly,
LII, 1941,

Dawson, T. F. “Major Thompson, Chief Ouray and the Utes,” Colorado Magazine, VII, 1930.
Douglas, Frederic H. “The Ute Indians,” Denver Art Museum Leaflts, 1, 1930.
Downing, Finis E. “With the Ute Peace Delegation of 1863, Across the Plains and
at the Conejos,” Colorado Magazine, XXII, 1945.

Espinosa, J. Manuel. “Journal of the Vargas Expedition into Colorado, 1694,”
Colorado Magazine, XV1, 1939.
Hafen, Ann Woodbury. “Efforts to Recover the Stolen Son of Chief Ouray,”
Colorado Magazine, XVI, no. 2, March, 1939, University of Utah, p. 53.
Hafen, LeRoy R. “The Fort Pueblo Massacre and the Punitive Expedition Against
the Indians,” Colorado Magazine, IV, 1927.
Havley, Florence, et al. “Culture Process and Change in Ute Adaptation,” Part
1 by Florence Hawley and others. El Palacio, vol. 57, no. 1, Oct., 1950,
pp. 311-331, no. 11, Nov., 1950, pp. 345-361.
Hill, Joseph J. “Spanish and New Mexican Exploration and Trade Northwest
from New Mexico into the Great Basin,” Utah Historical Quarterly, 111,
1930.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

102

The Southern Utes

Hoffmeister, Harold. “The Consolidated Ute Indian Reservation,” Geological
Review, vol. 33, no. 4, Oct., 1941, pp. 601-623. Tllustrated maps.
Hrdlicka, Ales. “Southern Ute;” Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 30, 1910,
Pp. ii, 619-20.
Jackson, W. H. “A Visit to the Los Pinos Indian Agency in 1874,” Colorado
Magazine, XV, 1938.
King, W. G. “Our Ute Indians,” Colorado Magazine, XXXVII, 1960, pp. 128-32.
Kroeber, Alfred L. “Notes on the Ute Language,” American Anthropologist, X,
1908.

Lawrence, Eleanor. “Horse Thieves on the Spanish Trail,” Touring Topics, January, 1931.
Lawrence, Eleanor, “Mexican Trade Between Santa Fe and Los Angeles, 1830~
48, California Historical Society Quarterly, X, 1931.
Leupp, Francis E. The Latest Phase of the Southern Ute Question. Philadelphia,
1895. (Pamphlet by Indian Rights Association.)
Malouf, Carling. “The Effects of Spanish Slavery on the Indians of the Intermountain West,” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, I, 1945, pp. 378-91.
McMechen, Edgar C. “Ouray Memorial Park Acquired by the State Historical
Society,” Colorado Magazine, XXII, 1945.
Mecker, Nathan C. “The Utes of Colorado,” The American Antiquarian, April,
1879.
Meston, G. D. “Southern Ute Agency,” Report on Indians, Taxed and Indians
not

Taxed,

United States Department

enth Census, 1890.

of the Interior, Census

Office, Elev-

Moulton, A. C. “A Trader with the Utes, and the Murder of Chief Shavano,” as
told by Arthur C. Moulton to James R. Harvey, Colorado Magazine, vol. 20,
no. 3, May, 1943.
Opler, Marvin Kaufmann. “A Colorado Ute Indian Bear Dance,” Southwestern
Lore, VIL, 1941.
Opler, Marvin Kaufmann. “Fact and Fancy in Ute Peyotism,” American Anthropologist, XLIV, 1942,
Opler, Marvin Kaufmann. “The Integration of the Sun Dance in Ute Religion,”
American Anthropologist, XLIIL, 1941,
Opler, Marvin Kaufmann, “The Origins of Comanche and Ute,” American
Anthropologist, XLV, 1943.
Opler, Marvin Kaufmann. “The Southern Ute,” American Anthropologist, XL,
1939.

Opler, Marvin Kaufmann. “The Southern Ute Dog-Dance and its Reported
Transmission to Taos,” New Mexico Anthropologist, 111, 1939.
Opler, Marvin Kaufman. “Southern Ute Pottery Types,” Masterkey, XIV, 1939.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

103

Essay on the Sources
Opler,

Marvin
1939.

Kaufman.

“The

Ute

Indian War

of 1879,” FEl Palacio, XLVI,

Payne, Captain J. Scott. “The Campaign Against the Utes,” United Service
Magazine, January, 1880.
Richie, Eleanor Louise. “General Mano Mocha of the Utes and the Spanish
Policy in Indian Relations,” Colorado Magazine, 1X, 1932.
Russell, James. “Conditions and Customs
Colorado Magazine, V1, 1929.

of Present Day

Utes

in Colorado,”

Schroeder, A. H. “A Brief History of the Southern Utes,” Southwestern Lore,
XXX, No. 4, March, 1965.
Sumner, Colonel E. V. “Beseiged by the Utes,” Century Magazine, 1891. (Mecker Massacre)
Tyler, S. Lyman. “The Spaniard and the Ute,” Utah Historical Quarterly, XXII,
no. 4, October, 1954.
Tyler, S. Lyman. “The Yuta Indians before 1680,” Western Humanities Review,
V, Spring, 1951.
One primary collection with much material in the history of the
Southern Utes, particularly for the years 1882-1900, is the Indian
Rights Association, correspondence and publications. During the
years 1882-1900, the Indian Rights Association waged a heroic battle
for, and in alliance with, the Southern Utes to help them maintain
their land base against the strident demands of the people of Colorado
that they be removed from the borders of that State. The records are
contained in the Indian Rights Association Collection at the Pennsylvania Historical Society Library in Philadelphia. Microfilm copies of
that massive collection (approximately 45,000 pages) can be used at
the Fort Lewis College Library, Southwest Collection, or at the University of Utah, Duke Oral Indian History Collection, in the Marriott
Library.
Indispensable to the study of American Indian history is that vast
area of documentation known as the Federal Records. One of the first
things that the researcher must do is to conduct an exhaustive study
of the documents contained in the Capital Serial Set. It gives the
researcher a short, quick, documentary history of a tribe from the shifting point of view of the Federal Government, and it offers the researcher a perspective from official records. The documents relating
to the Southern Utes alone comprise more than 5,000 pages. The
debates in Congress contained in the Congressional Globe and the
Congressional Record are also indispensable because they reflect the
attitudes and actions of those who governed from Washington.
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

104

The Southern Utes

For an in-depth view, however, a review of the letters sent and
received by the agents is a necessity. Although this source has not been
used extensively, these letters give a fresh look at the Anglo mind as he

tried to “improve” the lot of the Indian. This collection is vast, and is
contained largely in the Social and Economic Branch of the National
Archives. An additional body of materials is lodged in the Denver
Federal Records Center at Region 8 Headquarters in Denver, Colorado. Both the Denver Center and the National Archives have great
capability and their response will not impede the researcher from
working in a creditable and expeditious manner.
The old military records are also of importance; this is particularly true of the “Fort Lewis Military Records,” a collection of more
than 5,000 pages relating to the history of the Fort which was created
from part of the Southern Ute Reservation. A description of this collection is available in “Fort Lewis Records,” Floyd A. O’Neil and
Gregory C. Thompson, Colorado Historical Magazine, Vol. 46, no. 2,
Spring, 1969, pp. 166-68. Other records, such as the records of Fort
Massachusetts, Fort Garland, Fort Wingate, and Fort Stecle have
references and materials of some importance to Southern Ute history,

but from a military point of view the Fort Lewis collection is by far the
most important.
Federal Treaties and laws relating to the Utes for the period of
1849 to 1903 are found in Charles N. Kappler, Indian Affairs: Laws
and Treaties, 2 vols., G.P.O., Washington, D.C., 1904. Statutes-atLarge and Cession Laws after 1903, a valuable collection of records
documenting important economic, social, and political changes on the
reservation, are mandatory for any index study.
The Cartographic Division of the National Archives has many
maps of Southern Ute territory, as does the Library of Congress Collection in Arlington, Virginia.
Governmental records during Spanish and Mexican times are best
reviewed at the New Mexico State Records Center in Santa Fe, New
Mexico. Spanish and Mexican archives are now on microfilm.
Four bibliographies should be mentioned: Stewart, Omer C.,
Ethnohistorical Bibliography of the Ute Indians of Colorado. University of Colorado Studies: Series in Anthropology, No. 18. Boulder,
Colorado: University of Colorado Press, 1971; Tyler, S. Lyman, The
Ute People: A Bibliographical Checklist. Provo, Utah: Brigham
From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

105

Essay on the Sources

Young University, 1964; Wagner, Henry R., The Spanish Southwest,

An Annotated Bibliography. Berkeley, California,
2 Vols., Albuquerque:

Quivira Society,

1924. (Same title,

1937); Winther, Oscar Os-

burn, The Trans-Mississippi West: A Guide to its Periodical Literature
(1811-1938). Indiana University Publications, Social Sciences Series
No. 3. Bloomington, 1942, and later revisions. Both Henry R. Wagner
and Oscar O. Winther are of limited value to the study of Ute history;
however, Tyler’s work is indispensable. Although the publication is
cight years old at this writing, it is still the essential reference list that
must guide the scholar in this field.
Thus far, this essay has followed familiar lines to historians and
scholars. The sources are traditional and are known to most scholars.
However, this book has an additional dimension, particularly in that
section which is written by James Jefferson. This section is not based
heavily on the sources named but relies instead on personal knowledge,
conversations with a host of Indian people, the traditions of the reservation, and the kind of knowledge that grows out of being a member
of the Southern Ute ethos.
Some people have been particularly helpful to Mr. Jefferson, and
helpful as well to the others who have worked on this book. We are
indebted to Mr. Harry Richards, a venerable and knowledgeable, as
well as beloved citizen of the Southern Ute Reservation; Mr. Julius
Cloud, former Chairman of the Tribal Council, a respected leader
and a man whose presence delights and encourages the Southern Utes;
Mr. Bert Red; Mrs. Euterpe Taylor; and a large number of other
gracious persons who were of great help.
One of the unique facets of the production of this book was an
effort to collect the records of the Southern Utes and place those
records in a repository for the use of the tribe and the community.
That collection is known as “The Southern Ute Archival Collection.”
It represents the first formalized attempt to place the records of an
Indian tribe in the hands of the Tribal Council itself.
As the research was being done, copies were made of treaties,
agreements, administrative letters, scholarly theses and dissertations,

maps, photographs, and other related records. These were bound into
34 volumes of documents and placed in the office of Chairman Leonard
Burch. They are to be a source for development of additional curricular materials, for legal research, for the benefit of those who are manFrom the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

106

The Southern Utes

aging the property of the Southern Utes, and for scholarly research.
"This unique collection represents an effort both in size and in selectivity
unparalleled by any other tribe in America.
As to the magnificent contribution of the Southern Utes in this
entire project, without their help and without the constant involvement of the Southern Ute Tribal Council and their advice, direction,
encouragement, and support, this book would not have been possible.

From the collection of FloydA

O'Neil, University of Utah

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/tribal%3Asouthern_ute%3A1396150e870441a4. Public record. Not legal advice.
