# Proposed Processed Raspberry Promotion, Research, and Information Order

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/fr%3AE9-7981

## Record

- **Collection:** Federal Register
- **Document type:** Proposed Rule
- **Published:** April 9, 2009
- **Citation:** 74 FR 16266

## Text

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1208
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-07-0077; FV-07-705-PR-1A]
RIN 0581-AC37
Proposed Processed Raspberry Promotion, Research, and Information Order

AGENCY:

Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION:

Proposed rule with request for comments.

SUMMARY:

This rule proposes the establishment of an industry-funded promotion, research, and information program for processed raspberries. The proposed program, Processed Raspberry Promotion, Research, and Information Order (Proposed Order), was submitted to the Department of Agriculture (Department) by the Washington Red Raspberry Commission (WRRC). Under the Proposed Order, producers of raspberries for processing and importers of processed raspberries would pay an assessment of up to one cent per pound, with the initial assessment rate being one cent per pound, which would be paid to the proposed National Processed Raspberry Council (Council). Producers and importers of less than 20,000 pounds annually of raspberries for processing and processed raspberries respectively would be exempt from the assessment. The proposed program would be implemented under the Commodity Promotion, Research, and Information Act of 1996 (1996 Act). An initial referendum would be conducted among eligible producers of raspberries for processing and importers of processed raspberries to determine whether they favor the implementation of the program prior to it going into effect. This rule also announces the Agricultural Marketing Service's (AMS) intention to request approval of new processed raspberries information collection requirements by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the Proposed Order.

DATES:

Comments must be received by June 8, 2009. Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), comments on the information collection burden that would result from this proposal must be received by June 8, 2009.

ADDRESSES:

Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov
or to the Research and Promotion Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 0244, Room 0632-S, Washington, DC 20250-0244; fax: (202) 205-2800. All comments should reference the docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the
Federal Register
and will be made available for public inspection in the above office during regular business hours or can be viewed at
http://www.regulations.gov.

Pursuant to PRA, comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate, ways to minimize the burden, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, or any other aspect of this collection of information, should be sent to the above address. In addition, comments concerning the information collection should also be sent to the Desk Office for Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 725, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kimberly Coy, Marketing Specialist, Research and Promotion Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 0632, Stop 0244, Washington, DC 20250-0244; telephone: (202) 720-9915 or (888) 720-9917 (toll free); or facsimile: (202) 205-2800; or e-mail:
Kimberly.Coy@usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This rule is issued pursuant to the Commodity Promotion, Research, and Information Act of 1996 (1996 Act) (7 U.S.C. 7411-7425).

Executive Order 12866

This rule has been determined not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866 and therefore has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

Executive Order 12988

This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect. This rule will not preempt any state or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they represent an irreconcilable conflict with this rule. Section 524 of the 1996 Act provides that it shall not affect or preempt any other Federal or state law authorizing promotion or research relating to an agricultural commodity.

Under section 519 of the 1996 Act, a person subject to an order may file a written petition with the Department stating that an order, any provision of an order, or any obligation imposed in connection with an order, is not established in accordance with the law, and requesting a modification of an order or an exemption from an order. Any petition filed challenging an order, any provision of an order, or any obligation imposed in connection with an order, shall be filed within two years after the effective date of an order, provision, or obligation subject to challenge in the petition. The petitioner will have the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. Thereafter, the Department will issue a ruling on the petition. The 1996 Act provides that the district court of the United States for any district in which the petitioner resides or conducts business shall have the jurisdiction to review a final ruling on the petition, if the petitioner files a complaint for that purpose not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the Department's final ruling.

Executive Order 13132

This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This Executive Order directs agencies to construe, in regulations and otherwise, a Federal Statute to preempt State law only when the statute contains an express preemption provision. Section 524 of the 1996 Act provides that the Act shall not affect or preempt any other Federal or State law authorizing promotion or research relating to an agricultural commodity.

The WRRC and the Oregon Raspberry and Blackberry Commission (ORBC), the principal producers of processed raspberries, both administer State marketing orders, which require all producers of raspberries to pay assessments to support the health of their respective industries. Both the WRRC and ORBC invest funds into research programs at their land-grant universities and other research institutions to study disease, pest control, and varietal development. In addition to developing and funding production research, they also fund marketing and promotion programs and seek to foster education and communication between producers. However, according to the WRRC, WRRC, ORBC and international raspberry organizations have not been able to generate the funds necessary to support the marketing efforts needed to help expand processed raspberry consumption and increase the demand for processed raspberries. In order to manage increased production, increased competition, and changing consumer habits, the WRRC believes that a more extensive marketing program is needed. The WRRC and ORBC believe that a

national research and promotion program would fund the promotional aspect necessary to stay competitive and would place all domestic producers and importers on an equal playing field with each investing a fair share in promoting processed raspberries. If a national processed raspberry program is established, the WRRC and ORBC will continue to fund processed raspberry research in areas not likely to be the focus of the national program.

In accordance with the 1996 Act, this proposed rule would not preempt any of these State-legislated programs. Further, section 1208.52(h) of the Proposed Order provides for credit of assessments for those individuals who contribute to local, regional, or State organizations that engage in similar generic research, promotion, and information programs as partial fulfillment of assessments due to the Council subject to approval of the Secretary, for expenditure on generic research, promotion and information programs conducted within the United States.

The proposed program is not intended to duplicate any State program. Considerable attention is being made to involve producers in discussions regarding future program development and administration and what the State commissions would look like prior to the initial referendum. It is expected that farm related activities, such as production research, would continue to be funded by the State organizations and market development functions, such as nutritional research and marketing programs, would shift to the Proposed Order.

Not only were the States informed throughout the development of the national program, they were instrumental in the processed raspberry industry's decision to institute a national program.

In 2007, representatives from the WRRC were among other raspberry industry representatives who met with AMS representatives to discuss the possibility of implementing a national processed raspberry promotion, research, and information program. WRRC representatives participated in the development of the provisions of the Proposed Order during these meetings and with direct communication with the Oregon Raspberry and Blackberry Commission (ORBC).

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis

In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) [5 U.S.C. 601-612], AMS is required to examine the impact of the proposed rule on small entities. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be disproportionately burdened.

The Small Business Administration defines, in 13 CFR Part 121, small agricultural producers as those having annual receipts of no more than $750,000 and small agricultural service firms (handlers and importers) as those having annual receipts of no more than $7.0 million. Under these criteria, the majority of the producers and handlers that would be affected by this Proposed Order would be considered small entities, while most importers would not. Future, qualified organizations certified by the Secretary for nomination purposes, would be expected to generally consist of entities reflecting such sizes also. Producers and importers of less than 20,000 pounds per year of raspberries for processing and processed raspberries respectively would be exempt under this Proposed Order. Five organic producers and importers are also expected to be exempt from assessments. The number of entities assessed under the program would be around 245. Estimated revenue is expected at $1.2 million of which 43 percent is expected from imported product and 57 percent from domestic product.

According to the WRRC, in 2006, there were approximately 195 producers of raspberries for processing and 34 processors (first handlers) of processed raspberries in Oregon and Washington States, which are the principal growing areas in the United States for raspberries destined for processing. Approximately 95 percent of the producers and 100 percent of the raspberry processors qualified under the definition for small business owners. Although California is a significant producer of raspberries, virtually all harvested product is destined for the fresh market. In 2006, there were approximately 50 importers. Based on the U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Foreign Trade Statistics, in 2006 two countries accounted for 96 percent of the processed raspberries imported into the United States. These countries and their share of the imports are: Chile (78 percent) and Canada (18 percent).

The 1996 Act authorizes generic programs of promotion, research, and information for agricultural commodities. Congress found that it is in the national public interest and vital to the welfare of the agricultural economy of the United States to maintain and expand existing markets and develop new markets and uses for agricultural commodities through industry-funded, government-supervised, generic commodity promotion programs.

The WRRC submitted this Proposed Order to: (1) Develop and finance an effective and coordinated program of research, promotion, industry information, and consumer education regarding processed raspberries; (2) strengthen the position of the processed raspberry industry; and (3) maintain, develop, and expand existing markets for processed raspberries.

While the Proposed Order would impose certain recordkeeping requirements on first handlers, this information could be compiled from records currently maintained. First handlers would collect and remit the assessments on domestic processed raspberries to the Council. First handler responsibilities would include accurate recordkeeping and accounting on all raspberries purchased or contracted for processing including the number of pounds handled, the names of their producers, and the dates raspberries were purchased. The forms require the minimum information necessary to effectively carry out the requirements of the program, and their use is necessary to fulfill the intent of the 1996 Act. Such records must be retained for at least two years. This information is already maintained as a normal business practice. In addition, as these entities currently remit assessments under either the Washington or Oregon State programs, the additional recordkeeping and submission impact would be minimal.

There is also a minimal paperwork burden on producers. The Proposed Order would require producers to keep records and to provide information to the Council or the Department when requested. However, it is not anticipated that producers would be required to submit forms to the Council other than for nomination to the Council. If, for example, the Council needs information from a producer as part of the Council's compliance program, the information would need to be obtained through an audit of the producer's records instead of having the producer complete and submit paperwork.

In addition, there is a minimal burden on importers. The import assessments would be collected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (Customs) at time of entry into the United States. Importers would be required to keep records and to provide information to the Council or the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) when requested. However, it is not anticipated that importers would be required to submit forms to the Council for assessment collection because Customs conducts recordkeeping and

assessment remittance at the time of product entry into the United States. Importers who seek nomination to serve on the Council would be required to complete a background form which would be submitted to the Secretary.

Foreign producers from countries exporting a minimum of three million pounds of raspberries for processing based on a three-year average to the U.S. and at-large members seeking nomination to serve on the Council would be required to complete a background form which would be submitted to the Secretary.

The estimated annual cost of providing the information to the Council by an estimated 297 respondents (195 producers, 50 importers, 34 first handlers/processors, 2 foreign producers, 5 organic producers and importers, 10 certified organizations (for nomination purposes), and 1 at-large member) would be $9,141.

Section 518 of the 1996 Act provides for referenda to ascertain approval of the Proposed Order to be conducted either prior to its going into effect or within three years after assessments first begin under the Proposed Order. An initial referendum would be conducted prior to putting this Proposed Order in effect. The Proposed Order also provides for approval in a referendum to be based upon approval by a majority of those persons voting in the referendum. Every seven years, the Department shall conduct a referendum to determine whether producers and importers of processed raspberries favor the continuation, suspension, or termination of the Proposed Order. In addition, the Department could conduct a referendum at any time; at the request of 10 percent or more of all eligible producers of raspberries for processing and processed raspberries importers required to pay assessments; or if the Council requests that the Secretary hold a referendum.

The United States is among the leading producers of raspberries. Raspberries are grown in 46 states and are harvested late June to mid August. The 2002 Census of Agriculture indicates that about 80 percent of the U.S. raspberry acreage was in California, Oregon, and Washington.

According to the United States Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) and the Foreign Agricultural Service, in 2005, 178,300 million pounds of raspberries (fresh) with a combined value approaching $246 million (value at point of first sale) were produced in California, Oregon, and Washington, the three most productive States for growing raspberries in the United States. In 2006, 179,850 million pounds were produced and utilized, at a value of almost $275 million. California's crop is predominately delivered to the fresh market, while Oregon and Washington are the principal producers of processed raspberries.

Domestic production varies from year to year due to climatic conditions and field health. Over the last fifteen years, total domestic production of raspberries delivered to processors in the United States (i.e., production utilized for processing) has increased from 47.5 million pounds in 1991 to almost 75 million pounds in 2005 with most recent years averaging approximately 65 million pounds. Washington continues to be the major supplier of processed raspberries to the domestic market, although its market share declined from 72 percent to 51 percent between 2001 and 2006. In comparison, imported raspberries have surged from 7.5 to 53.8 million pounds from 1991 to 2005 and decreased to 48.9 million pounds in 2006. Chile, which is the predominate importer of processed raspberries to the United States, supplied just over 30 percent of the market in 2005 and 2006.

Domestic uses of processed raspberries include further processing into juices, jellies, baked goods, and consumer retailer packs. After averaging approximately 100 million pounds for the period 1999 to 2004, approximately 128 million pounds of processed raspberries were produced and/or imported into the United States in 2005 and 111 million pounds in 2006. These totals were calculated by using imports of frozen raspberries (from USDA's Foreign Agricultural Service) and NASS reports of production utilized for processing in Oregon and Washington. Because of the way imports are currently reported, and because of the way NASS reports raspberry data, the totals represent the best information currently available.

The following countries are major exporters of raspberries to the United States: Canada, Chile, China, France, and Poland. Canada and Chile represented 91.5 percent share of total import tonnage in the domestic United States market from 2002 to 2006, with 26 and 65.5 percent respectively.

The same growing conditions and harvesting period apply to the Pacific Northwest and British Columbia, the major raspberry growing region in Canada. Exports of processed frozen raspberries from British Colombia to the United States ranged from 2.9 million metric tons to 5.7 million metric tons over the past five years.

Contra-season raspberry production in the southern hemisphere is primarily located in Chile, with a harvest season beginning in December and continuing into February. However, processed raspberries are imported into the United States throughout the year.

The Proposed Order would authorize a fixed assessment paid by producers of raspberries for processing and importers of processed raspberries at a rate of up to one cent per pound, with the initial assessment rate being one cent per pound. The assessment rate will be reviewed, and increased or decreased as recommended by the Council and approved by the Secretary after the first referendum is conducted as stated in § 1208.71 (a). Such an increase or decrease may occur not more than once annually. Any change in the assessment rate shall be subject to rulemaking by the Department, and will be reviewed, and increased or decreased by the Secretary through rulemaking as recommended by the Council. Any change in the assessment rate shall be announced by the Council at least 30 days prior to going into effect. The maximum assessment rate authorized is one cent per pound.

At the proposed rate of assessment of up to one cent per pound, with the initial assessment rate being one cent per pound, the Council would collect approximately $1.2 million annually based on an estimated 120 million pound supply from domestic raspberries for processing and imports of processed raspberries. The domestic supply represents approximately 57 percent of the total and imports represent 43 percent.

The Proposed Order would exempt producers and importers of less than 20,000 pounds annually of raspberries for processing and processed raspberries respectively. A review of producer delivery statistics from Oregon and Washington States indicate that around 15 percent of all producers would have been exempted from assessment in 2006 from the proposed research and promotion program based on a 20,000 pounds exemption threshold. Also, organic producers and importers would be exempt from assessment. Section 515 of the 1996 Act provides for the establishment of a board or council consisting of producers, importers, and others in the marketing chain as appropriate. The Proposed Order would provide for the establishment of the National Processed Raspberry Council to administer the Proposed Order under AMS oversight. The Secretary would appoint members to the Council from nominees submitted in accordance with the Proposed Order. The WRRC proposed that the Council be composed of 13 members and their alternates. The

proposed Council membership is as follows: six producer members of raspberries for processing from States producing a minimum of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing; one producer member of raspberries for processing representing all other States that produce less than the minimum of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing; three processed raspberry importer members; two foreign producers from countries exporting a minimum of three million pounds of raspberries for processing to the U.S. based on a three-year average; and one at-large member recommended by the Council. The distribution of producer member of raspberries for processing positions among the States producing a minimum of three million pounds of raspberries would be proportional to the average of the total pounds delivered to the processor for processing over the previous three years. The States that provide less than three million pounds will be combined into one region and will have one producer representative.

Under the Proposed Order, the Council members and alternates will serve for a term of three years and be able to serve a maximum of two consecutive terms. When the Council is first established, four producer members, two importers, one of the two foreign producers, and the at-large member and their respective alternates will be assigned initial terms of three years; and, three producer members, one importer member, and the second foreign producer and their respective alternates will serve an initial term of two years. Thereafter, each of these positions will carry a full three-year term. Members serving an initial term of two years will be eligible to serve a second three-year term to complete their eligibility. Council nominations and appointments will take place in two out of every three years. Each term of office will end on December 31, and a new term will begin on January 1.

Producers and importers would represent those entities in the United States. The United States would be defined to include collectively the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the territories and possessions of the United States.

The nominations for the six producer and alternate members from States producing a minimum three-year average of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing will be submitted to the Council in the following manner: (1) For those States that have a State raspberry commission or State marketing order, the State commission or committee will nominate producers and their alternates to serve; or (2) for those States that do not have a State commission or State marketing order, the Council will seek nominations from the State Departments of Agriculture for members and alternates from the specific States.

For those States producing a minimum three-year average of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing that have a State raspberry commission or State marketing order, the State commission or committee nominations will be returned to the Council and placed on a ballot which will then be sent to producers in the State for a vote. The nominee for member will have received the highest number of votes cast. The person with the second highest number of votes cast will be the nominee for alternate. The persons with the third and fourth place highest number of votes cast will be designated as additional nominees for consideration by the Secretary. Once the Council has received all of the nominations from commissions or committees, the information will be submitted to the Secretary for appointment. Nominations for the initial Council will be handled by the Department. Subsequent nominations will be handled by the Council staff and shall be submitted to the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office.

If the Department determines that there are no State raspberry commissions or State marketing orders from States producing a minimum three-year average of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing, the Council will seek nominations from the State Departments of Agriculture for members and alternates from the specific States who may directly submit nominations to the Department for the initial Council. Subsequent nominations shall be submitted to the Council and will be handled by the Council staff who in turn shall submit those nominations to the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office.

The distribution of the six producer and alternate seats will be proportional to the percentage determined by the average of the total pounds produced and delivered to processors for processing over the previous three years divided by the average total pounds produced over the previous three years. For example, if Washington State and Oregon are the only two States producing a minimum of 3 million pounds each, and Washington's previous three-year average is 62.4 million pounds and Oregon's previous three-year average is 6.7 million pounds with the average total pounds for the previous three years being 69.1 million pounds, Washington would have 90 percent of the production and Oregon would have 10 percent of the production. Therefore, Washington would obtain five out of the six seats and Oregon would receive one seat.

The nomination for the one raspberry producer of raspberries for processing and alternate member, who represents all other States producing less than a minimum three-year average of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing, will constitute a region and the nominations will be submitted to the Council in the following manner: (1) For those States that have a State raspberry commission or State marketing order, the State commission or committee will nominate producers and their alternates to serve; or (2) for those States that do not have a State commission or State marketing order, the Council will seek nominations from the State Departments of Agriculture for the member and alternate from the specific States.

For those States producing less than a minimum three-year average of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing that have a State raspberry commission or State marketing order, the State commission or committee nominations will be returned to the Council and placed on a ballot which will then be sent to producers in the Region for a vote. The nominee for member will have received the highest number of votes cast. The person with the second highest number of votes cast will be the nominee for alternate. The persons with the third and fourth place highest number of votes cast will be designated as additional nominees for consideration by the Secretary. Once the Council has received all of the nominations from commissions or committees, the information will be submitted to the Secretary for appointment. Nominations for the initial Council will be handled by the Department. Subsequent nominations will be handled by the Council staff and shall be submitted to the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office.

If the Department determines that there are no State raspberry commissions or State marketing orders from States producing less than a minimum three-year average of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing, the Council will seek nominations from the State Departments of Agriculture for members and alternates from the specific States. The State Departments of Agriculture would

have the opportunity to participate in nomination caucuses and will directly submit as a group a single slate of nominations to the Department for the producer position and the producer alternate position on the Council for the initial Council. Subsequent nominations shall be submitted to the Council and will be handled by the Council staff who in turn shall submit those nominations to the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office.

Only producers from States that deliver raspberries for processing and pay assessments under the program are eligible for nomination and election to the Council. Average production will be based upon Department production data for the initial nomination and production figures generated by either the Council or the Department thereafter.

Nominations for the three processed raspberry importer member positions and their alternates will be made by qualified national organizations representing importers. Two nominees for each member and each alternate position will be submitted to the Secretary for consideration.

All qualified national organizations representing importers would have the opportunity to participate in nomination caucuses and will submit as a group a single slate of nominations to the Secretary for the importer positions and the importer alternate positions on the Council.

Eligible organizations must submit nominations to the Department not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office. To become a qualified national organization representing importers under the Proposed Order, each such organization would be required to meet the following criteria: (1) Any organization representing importers must represent a substantial number of importers who market a substantial volume of raspberries for processing; (2) it must have a history of stability and permanency and have been in existence for more than one year; (3) it must promote processed raspberry importers' welfare; and (4) it must derive a portion of its operating funds from importers.

If the Department determines that there are no qualified national organizations representing importers, individuals who have paid their assessments to the Council in the most recent fiscal year or for the initial Council, those that imported processed raspberries into the U.S. in the most recent fiscal year, could directly submit nominations to the Department for the initial Council. Subsequent nominations shall be submitted to the Council and will be handled by the Council staff who in turn shall submit those nominations to the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office.

Nominations for the two foreign producer member positions and their alternates will be made by qualified organizations representing foreign producers. Two nominees for each member and each alternate position will be submitted to the Secretary for consideration.

All qualified organizations representing foreign producers would have the opportunity to participate in nomination caucuses and will submit as a group a single slate of nominations per country to the Secretary for foreign producer positions and the foreign producer alternate positions on the Council.

Eligible organizations must submit nominations to the Department not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office. To become a qualified organization representing foreign producers under the Proposed Order, each such organization would be required to meet the following criteria: (1) Any organization representing foreign producers must represent a substantial number of foreign producers who market or produce a substantial volume of raspberries for processing; (2) it must have a history of stability and permanency and have been in existence for more than one year; (3) it must promote processed raspberry foreign producers' welfare; (4) it must derive a portion of its operating funds from foreign producers; and (5) must be from a country exporting a minimum of three million pounds of raspberries for processing to the U.S. based on a three-year average.

If the Department determines that there are no qualified organizations representing foreign producer interest, individual foreign producers may directly submit nominations to the Department for the initial Council. Subsequent nominations shall be submitted to the Council and will be handled by the Council staff who in turn shall submit those nominations to the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office.

In recommending the at-large member and alternate, the Council can give consideration to nutrition health professionals and others interested in the raspberry industry. Nominations for the at-large member and alternate will be conducted at a Council meeting by the Council staff and shall be submitted by the Council to the Secretary for approval not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office. Nominations for the initial Council will be handled by the Department.

The 1996 Act provides that to ensure fair and equitable representation, the composition of a board or council shall reflect the geographic distribution of the production of the agriculture commodity in the United States and the quantity or value of the agriculture commodity imported into the United States. The Proposed Order states that at least once every five years, but not more frequently than once every three years, the Council will review the geographic distribution of United States production of processed raspberries and the quantity and source of processed raspberry imports. If warranted, the Council will recommend to the Secretary that membership on the Council be altered to reflect any changes in geographic distribution of domestic raspberry production and the quantity of imports. Also, if the level of imports increases or decreases, importer members and alternates may be added or reduced on the Council. However, the foreign producer seats will remain the same regardless of the volume of imports from importing countries.

The Proposed Order provides that all officers, employees, and agents of the Department and of the Council are required to keep confidential all information obtained from persons subject to the Proposed Order. This information would be disclosed only if the Department considers the information relevant, and the information is revealed in a judicial proceeding or administrative hearing brought at the direction or on the request of the Department or to which the Department or any officer of the Department is a party. However, the issuance of general statements based on reports or on information relating to a number of persons subject to the Proposed Order would be permitted, if the statements do not identify the information furnished by any person. Finally, the publication, by direction of the Department, of the name of any person violating the Proposed Order and a statement of the particular provisions of the Proposed Order violated by the person would be allowed.

Proposed recordkeeping and reporting requirements for the raspberry promotion, research, and information program would be designed to minimize the burden on the raspberry industry.

The estimated total cost of providing information to the Council by all respondents would be $9,141. This total has been estimated by multiplying 277 total hours required for reporting and recordkeeping by $33, the average mean

hourly earnings of various occupations involved in keeping this information. Data for computation of this hourly rate was obtained from the U.S. Department of Labor Statistics.

With regard to alternatives to this proposed rule, the 1996 Act itself does provide for authority to tailor a program according to the individual needs of an industry. Provision is made for permissive terms in an order in section 516 of the 1996 Act, and other sections provide for alternatives. Section 514 of the 1996 Act provides for orders applicable to (1) producers, (2) first handlers and other persons in the marketing chain as appropriate, and (3) importers (if imports are subject to assessment). Section 516 states that an order may include an exemption of de minimis quantities of an agricultural commodity; different payment and reporting schedules; coverage of research, promotion, and information activities to expand, improve, or make more efficient the marketing or use of an agricultural commodity in both domestic and foreign markets; provision for reserve funds; provision for credits for generic activities for those individuals who contribute to other similar generic research, promotion, and information programs at State, regional or local level; and assessment of imports. In addition, section 518 of the 1996 Act provides for referenda to ascertain approval of an order to be conducted either prior to its going into effect or within three years after assessments first begin under the order. An order also may provide for its approval in a referendum to be based upon (1) a majority of those persons voting; (2) persons voting for approval who represent a majority of the volume of the agricultural commodity; or (3) a majority of those persons voting for approval who also represent a majority of the volume of the agricultural commodity. Section 515 of the 1996 Act provides for establishment of a council from among producers, first handlers, and others in the marketing chain as appropriate and importers, if importers are subject to assessment.

This proposal includes provisions for both domestic and foreign market expansion and improvement; reserve funds; credits for generic activities; assessments on imports; and an initial referendum to be conducted prior to the Proposed Order going into effect. Approval would be determined by a majority of producers and importers voting for approval.

Similar to WRRC, Oregon also has a state raspberry commission, the Oregon Raspberry and Blackberry Commission (ORBC). The WRRC and ORBC both administer State marketing orders, which require all producers of raspberries to pay assessments to support the health of their respective industries. According to WRRC, the two commissions have developed a good working relationship with each other over the years. Both the WRRC and ORBC invest funds into research programs at their land-grant universities and other research institutions to study disease, pest control, and varietal development. In addition to developing and funding production research, they also fund marketing and promotion programs and seek to foster education and communication between producers. However, according to the WRRC, WRRC, ORBC and international raspberry organizations have not been able to generate the funds necessary to support the marketing efforts needed to help expand processed raspberry consumption and increase the demand for processed raspberries. In order to manage increased production, increased competition, and changing consumer habits, the WRRC believes that a more extensive marketing program is needed. The WRRC and ORBC believe that a national research and promotion program would fund the promotional aspect necessary to stay competitive and would place all domestic producers and importers on an equal playing field with each investing a fair share in promoting processed raspberries. The Council may provide credits of assessments for those individuals who contribute to local, regional, or State organizations engaged in similar generic research, promotion, and information programs as applied to assessment due to the Council subject to approval of the Secretary, for expenditure on generic research, promotion and information programs conducted within the United States. If a national processed raspberry program is established, the WRRC and ORBC will continue to fund processed raspberry research in areas not likely to be the focus of the national program.

The WRRC and ORBC programs are not able to engage raspberry production in other States or countries in a meaningful way. The proposed program is not intended to duplicate any State program. Considerable attention is being made to involve producers in discussions regarding future program development and administration and what the State commissions would look like prior to the initial referendum. It is expected that farm related activities, such as production research, would continue to be funded by the State organizations and market development functions, such as nutritional research and marketing programs, would shift to the Proposed Order.

The WRRC proposed that producers and importers of less than 20,000 pounds annually of raspberries for processing and processed raspberries respectively, be exempt from assessments. In addition, WRRC proposed that a producer who operates under an approved National Organic Program (NOP) system plan, produces only products eligible to be labeled as 100 percent organic under the NOP, and is not a split operation, be exempt from paying assessments under the Proposed Order. An importer who imports only products eligible to be labeled as 100 percent organic under the NOP, and is not a split operation, would also be exempt from paying assessments.

While the Department has performed this Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis regarding the impact of the proposed rule on small entities, in order to have as much data as possible for a more comprehensive analysis of the effects of this rule on small entities, we are inviting comments concerning potential effects. The Department is also requesting comments regarding the number and size of entities covered under the Proposed Order.

Paperwork Reduction Act

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 [44 U.S.C. Chapter 35], AMS announces its intention to request an approval of a new information collection and recordkeeping requirements for the proposed Processed Raspberry Program.

Title:
Advisory Committee or Research and Promotion Background Information.

OMB Number for background form AD-755:
(Approved under OMB No. 0505-0001).

Expiration Date of Approval:
March 31, 2009.

Title:
National Research, Promotion, and Consumer Information Programs.

OMB Number:
0581-NEW.

Expiration Date of Approval:
3 years from approval date.

Type of Request:
New information collection for research and promotion programs.

Abstract:
The information collection requirements in the request are essential to carry out the intent of the 1996 Act.

There will also be the additional burden on producers and importers voting in referenda. The referendum ballot, which represents the information collection requirement relating to referenda, is addressed in a proposed rule on referendum procedures which is published separately in this issue of the
Federal Register.

Under the proposed program, first handlers would be required to collect assessments from producers and file reports with and submit assessments to the Council. While the Proposed Order would impose certain recordkeeping requirements on first handlers, information required under the Proposed Order could be compiled from records currently maintained. Such records shall be retained for at least two years beyond the marketing year of their applicability.

Under the Proposed Order, importers are responsible to pay assessments. Importers must report the total quantity of produce imported during the reporting period and a record of each importation of such product during such period, giving quantity, date, and port of entry. Under the Proposed Order, Customs would collect assessments on imported processed raspberries and remit the funds to the Council.

An estimated 297 respondents would provide information to the Council. They would be 195 producers, 50 importers, 34 first handlers/processors, 5 organic producers and importers (for exemption purposes), 2 foreign producers, 10 certified organizations (for nomination purposes), and 1 at-large member. The estimated cost of providing the information to the Council by respondents would be $9,141. This total has been estimated by multiplying 277 total hours required for reporting and recordkeeping by $33, the average mean hourly earnings of various occupations involved in keeping this information. Data for computation of this hourly rate was obtained from the U.S. Department of Labor Statistics.

The Proposed Order's provisions have been carefully reviewed, and every effort has been made to minimize any unnecessary recordkeeping costs or requirements, including efforts to utilize information already submitted under other raspberry programs administered by the Department and other state programs.

The proposed forms would require the minimum information necessary to effectively carry out the requirements of the program, and their use is necessary to fulfill the intent of the 1996 Act. Such information can be supplied without data processing equipment or outside technical expertise. In addition, there are no additional training requirements for individuals filling out reports and remitting assessments to the Council. The forms would be simple, easy to understand, and place as small a burden as possible on the person required to file the information.

Collecting information yearly would coincide with normal industry business practices. The timing and frequency of collecting information are intended to meet the needs of the industry while minimizing the amount of work necessary to fill out the required reports. The requirement to keep records for two years is consistent with normal industry practices. In addition, the information to be included on these forms is not available from other sources because such information relates specifically to individual producers, first handlers, processors, foreign producers, and importers who are subject to the provisions of the 1996 Act.

Therefore, there is no practical method for collecting the required information without the use of these forms.

Information collection requirements that are included in this proposal include:

(1)
A Background Information Form AD-755 (OMB Form No. 0505-0001).

Estimate of Burden:
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.5 hours per response for each Council nominee.

Respondents:
Producers, importers, foreign producers, and at-large nominee.

Estimated Number of Respondents:
26 (52 for initial nominations to the Council, 26 in subsequent years).

Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent:
1 every 3 years. (0.3)

Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:
26 hours for the initial nominations to the Council and 3.9 hours annually thereafter.

(2)
An Annual Report by Each First Handler of Processed Raspberries.

Estimate of Burden:
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.5 hours per first handler reporting on processed raspberries handled.

Respondents:
First handlers.

Estimated Number of Respondents:
34.

Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent:
1.

Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:
17 hours.

(3)
An Exemption Application for Producers and Importers Who Would Be Exempt from Assessments.

Estimate of Burden:
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.25 hours per producers, or importer reporting on processed raspberries produced or imported. Upon approval of an application, producers and importers will receive exemption certification.

Respondents:
Exempt producers and importers.

Estimated Number of Respondents:
40.

Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent:
1.

Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:
10 hours.

(4)
Application for Reimbursement of Assessment.

Estimate of Burden:
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.25 hours per request for reimbursement.

Respondents:
Importers.

Estimated Number of Respondents:
10.

Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent:
1.

Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:
2.5 hours.

(5)
A Requirement To Maintain Records Sufficient To Verify Reports Submitted Under the Order.

Estimate of Burden:
Public recordkeeping burden for keeping this information is estimated to average 0.5 hours per record keeper maintaining such records.

Recordkeepers:
Producers, first handlers, and importers.

Estimated Number of Recordkeepers:
297.

Estimated Total Recordkeeping Hours:
148.5 hours.

(6)
Application for Certification of Organizations.

Estimate of Burden:
Public recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.5 hours per application.

Respondents:
Importers and foreign producer organizations.

Estimated Number of Respondents:
10.

Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent:
1.

Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:
5 hours.

(7)
Nomination Appointment Form.

Estimate of Burden:
Public recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.25 hours per application.

Respondents:
Producers, importers, and foreign producers.

Estimated Number of Respondents:
150.

Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent:
1.

Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:
37.5 hours.

(8)
Nomination Appointment Ballot.

Estimate of Burden:
Public recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.25 hours per application.

Respondents:
Producers and importers.

Estimated Number of Respondents:
150.

Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent:
1.

Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:
37.5 hours.

(9)
Application for Assessments Credit.

Estimate of Burden:
Public recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.25 hours per application.

Respondents:
Producers.

Estimated Number of Respondents:
50.

Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent:
1.

Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:
12.5 hours.

(10)
Organic Exemption Form.

Estimate of Burden:
Public recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.5 hours per exemption form.

Respondents:
Producers and importers.

Estimated Number of Respondents:
5.

Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent:
1.

Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents:
2.5 hours.

Request for Public Comment Under the Paperwork Reduction Act

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of the Proposed Order and the Department's oversight of the Proposed Order, including whether the information would have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the principal growing areas in the United States for raspberries destined for processing; (d) the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the number of producers and first handlers of processed raspberries that would be covered under the program; (e) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (f) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

Comments concerning the information collection requirements contained in this action should reference OMB No. 0581-NEW. In addition, the docket number, date, and page number of this issue of the
Federal Register
also should be referenced. Comments should be sent to the USDA Docket Clerk, Research and Promotion Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 0244, Room 0632-S, Washington, DC 20250-0244. Comments may also be sent by facsimile to (202) 205-2800 or electronically to
http://www.regulations.gov
. All comments received will be available for public inspection during regular business hours at the same address. Comments regarding information collection should also be sent to the Office of Management and Budget at: Desk Office for Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 725, Washington, DC 20503.

OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information contained in this rule between 30 and 60 days after publication. Therefore, a comment to OMB is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication.

Background

This rule proposes the implementation of a Processed Raspberry Promotion, Research, and Information Order (Proposed Order). The Department received the proposal for a new Order from the Washington Red Raspberry Commission (WRRC).

The Proposed Order is authorized under the 1996 Act which authorizes the Department to establish agricultural commodity research and promotion orders which may include a combination of promotion, research, industry information, and consumer information activities funded by mandatory assessments. These programs are designed to maintain and expand market and uses for agricultural commodities. The Proposed Order would provide for the continued development and financing of a coordinated program of research, promotion, and information for processed raspberries.

The 1996 Act provides for a number of optional provisions that allow the tailoring of orders for different commodities. Section 516 of the 1996 Act provides permissive terms for orders, and other sections provide for alternatives. For example, section 514 of the 1996 Act provides for orders applicable to (1) producers (if producers are subject to assessment), (2) first handlers and others in the marketing chain as appropriate, and (3) importers. Section 516 states that an order may include an exemption of
de minimis
quantities of an agricultural commodity; different payment and reporting schedules; coverage of research, promotion, and information activities to expand, improve, or make more efficient the marketing or use of an agricultural commodity in both domestic and foreign markets; provision for reserve funds; provision for credits for generic and branded activities; and assessment of imports.

In addition, section 518 of the 1996 Act provides for referenda to ascertain approval of an order to be conducted either prior to its going into effect or within three years after assessments first begin under the order. An order also may provide for its approval in a referendum based upon different voting patterns. Section 515 provides for establishment of a board or council from among producers, first handlers and others in the marketing chain as appropriate, and importers, if imports are subject to assessment.

This Proposed Order includes provisions for both domestic and foreign market expansion and improvement, reserve funds, credit for generic activities, and an initial referendum to be conducted prior to the Proposed Order going into effect. Approval would be determined by a majority of producers and importers voting for approval. Specific procedures to be followed in the referendum will be published in a separate
Federal Register
publication.

In accordance with the 1996 Act, the Department would oversee the program's operations. In addition, the 1996 Act requires the Secretary to conduct subsequent referenda: (1) Not later than seven years after assessments first begin under the Proposed Order; or (2) at the request of the Council established under the Proposed Order; or (3) at the request of 10 percent or more of the number of persons eligible to vote. In addition to these criteria, the 1996 Act provides that the Secretary may conduct a referendum at any time to determine whether the continuation, suspension, or termination of an order or a provision of that order is favored by persons eligible to vote.

The WRRC has requested that a referendum be conducted every five years to determine if producers and importers want the program to continue. However, the Department has increased the time period to seven years to make the Proposed Order consistent with other programs. In addition, the Proposed Order allows for the Secretary to conduct a subsequent referendum if 10 percent or more of all eligible producers of raspberries for processing and importers of processed raspberries request it; or if the Council requests a referendum to be held; or the Secretary may hold one at any time.

A national research and promotion program for processed raspberries would help the industry to address the

many market problems it currently faces. According to the WRRC, three main factors currently affecting processed raspberry sales, both here in the domestic market and abroad, are increasing production, increased competition, and changing consumer habits.

U.S. per capita consumption of processed raspberries has inched upward during the period 1991 to 2004, reaching a high of 0.3 pounds per person in 2003 and 2005. Over this period, consumption has ranged from 0.1 to 0.3 pounds per capita. This fluctuation is due to the effects of population growth, demographics of consumers, and the availability of substitute or competitive products. Profitability for producers of raspberries for processing depends on maintaining and increasing processed raspberry consumption. With crop value flat over this period, an organized market development program that grew market demand and increased per capita consumption could improve the farm gate value for all suppliers of processed raspberries. The WRRC believes a generic research and promotion program would provide an equitable manner for producers to share in the costs of product development, nutrition and marketing research, and processed raspberry promotion.

According to the Department's Foreign Agricultural Service statistics, from 2002-2006, imports of processed raspberries have increased market share in the U.S. The statistics also suggests that the total market demand in the U.S. is continuing to grow, albeit at a rate slower than supply. The industry believes that the proposed processed raspberry program would increase demand, grow the market in the aggregate for all suppliers, and increase the value of processed raspberries at the grower level.

The processed raspberry industry is facing strong competition in the marketplace from both indirect and direct competitors. Like all food products, processed raspberries must compete for a share of the consumer dollar. As competition in the supermarket increases, the processed raspberry industry must work harder to gain its share of consumer attention at a time when the industry's competitors expand their promotional activities.

The WRRC was established in 1976 as a State-government entity authorized by a State marketing order which requires producers of all varieties of raspberries pay assessments to promote raspberry awareness, consumption, and to conduct research programs to study pest control and varietals development. There are over 40 different suppliers of raspberry products who make up the WRRC. These members pay the mandatory one-half cent per pound to fund promotion efforts directed to both consumer and industrial users.

Similar to WRRC, Oregon also has a state raspberry commission, the Oregon Raspberry and Blackberry Commission (ORBC). The WRRC and ORBC both administer State marketing orders, which require all producers of raspberries to pay assessments to support the health of their respective industries. According to WRRC, the two commissions have developed a good working relationship with each other over the years. Both the WRRC and ORBC invest funds into research programs at their land grant universities and other research institutions to study disease, pest control, and varietal development. In addition to developing and funding production research, they also fund marketing and promotion programs and seek to foster education and communication between producers. However, according to the WRRC, WRRC, ORBC and international raspberry organizations have not been able to generate the funds necessary to support the marketing efforts needed to help expand processed raspberry consumption and increase the demand for processed raspberries. In order to manage increased production, increased competition, and changing consumer habits, the WRRC believes that a more extensive marketing program is needed. The WRRC and ORBC believe that a national research and promotion program would fund the promotional aspect necessary to stay competitive and would place all domestic producers and importers on an equal playing field with each investing a fair share in promoting processed raspberries. The Council may provide credits of assessments for those individuals who contribute to local, regional, or State organizations engaged in similar generic research, promotion, and information programs as applied to assessment due to the Council subject to approval of the Secretary, for expenditure on generic research, promotion and information programs conducted within the United States. If a national processed raspberry program is established, the WRRC and ORBC will continue to fund processed raspberry research in areas not likely to be the focus of the national program.

In 2006, an informal strategic review was conducted by the WRRC and the Raspberry Industry Development Council, who represents raspberry growers in British Columbia, Canada. During the strategic review, public and private sector industry representatives and food processors were interviewed seeking answers to the challenging dynamics facing the raspberry industry. The participants in the raspberry industry concluded that demand and market growth could best be accomplished by: (1) Analyzing existing nutritional research and conducting new research on the positive nutritional qualities of raspberries; (2) communicating raspberries nutritional advantages to consumers, food processors, and food industry in simple terms; and (3) increasing the number of new raspberry products and the use of raspberries in existing products.

The raspberry industry recognizes that there currently exists a strong scientific basis to support the health benefits of raspberries, including processed raspberries, but the current data has not been effectively communicated to food processors or consumers.

According to the WRRC, market growth for processed raspberries has been impeded by disorganized and fractured marketing with no clear and consistent message, and by a dearth of merchandising and new product development. Additionally, scientifically validated health-based research could have important marketing ramifications, but unless the findings are accompanied by a clear consistent marketing message to communicate significant results, there will be little or no impact on increasing processed raspberry consumption.

In addition, the raspberry industry understands that consumers need to know about foods that are good for their health. According to the WRRC, it is widely accepted that North Americans are increasingly concerned with improving their quality of life, and raspberries are positioned to respond to this trend. Consumers will not sacrifice flavor or enjoyment, and they are increasingly making food choices based on how they affect their future health. Aging demographics are creating demand for nutraceutical, health maintenance, and disease prevention attributes in food products. Consumers want to maintain health and vitality as they age. Foods such as raspberries can be positively linked to achieving this desire.

WRRC stated that given processed raspberries low profile and stagnant market, the raspberry industry must increase awareness of the possible health attributes of raspberries, explore new product applications, become established in new domestic market niches, and develop new products if it is to realize its potential for market development. WRRC believes that these

challenges facing the processed raspberry industry to grow the market are not insurmountable. Through a generic research and promotion program, the raspberry industry would be able to: Capitalize more effectively on the possible health benefits of raspberries; improve demand and strengthen their position in the marketplace; maintain and expand existing domestic and foreign markets; and develop new markets and uses for processed raspberries.

Additional funds generated through a national program would allow the processed raspberry industry to take advantage of a wide range of promotional opportunities. At a minimum, increased funding would allow the industry to expand its current consumer, food service, and food manufacturer promotion efforts.

Section 516(f) of the 1996 Act allows an order to authorize the levying of assessments on imports of the commodity covered by the program or on products containing that commodity, at a rate comparable to the rate determined for the domestic agricultural commodity covered by the order. WRRC has proposed to assess imports as well as domestic product.

The assessment levied on domestically-produced and imported processed raspberries would be used to pay for promotion, research, and consumer and industry information as well as administration, maintenance, and functioning of the Council. Expenses incurred by the Secretary in implementing and administering the Proposed Order, including referenda costs, also would be paid from assessments. Assessments would be paid by producers and importers of 20,000 or more pounds of raspberries for processing or processed raspberries respectively. The number of entities assessed under the program would be around 245. Estimated revenue is expected at $1.2 million of which 43 percent is expected from imported product and 57 percent from domestic product.

Section 516(e)(1) and (2) of the 1996 Act allows the Secretary to provide credits of assessments for generic and branded activities. The WRRC has elected to propose credits for generic activities. The Proposed Order gives the Council authority to provide credits of assessments for those individuals who contribute to other similar generic research, promotion, and information programs at the State, regional, or local level subject to the approval of the Secretary. The activities must be generic in nature and may not promote a particular State or region's product. No credit will be given for funds expended for administrative purposes.

Under the Proposed Order “first handler” would be defined as any person (excluding a common or contract carrier) receiving raspberries for processing from producers in a calendar year and who, as owner or agent, ships or causes processed raspberries to be shipped as specified in the Proposed Order. This definition includes those engaged in the business of buying, selling and/or offering for sale, receiving, packing, grading, marketing, or distributing raspberries in commercial quantities. This definition excludes a retailer, except a retailer who purchases or acquires from, or handles on behalf of, any producer of raspberries for processing. The term first handler includes a producer who handles or markets raspberries of the producer's own production. In addition, “handle” would be defined to mean to process, package, sell, transport, purchase or in any other way place processed raspberries, or cause them to be placed, in the current of commerce. This term includes selling processed raspberries imported into the United States. This term does not include the transportation of fresh raspberries by the producer to a handler or transportation by a commercial carrier of fresh raspberries and organic raspberries, whether processed or unprocessed for the account of the first handler or producer.

First handlers would be responsible for the collection of assessments from producers of raspberries for processing. In the case of the producer acting as its own first handler, the producer would be required to collect and remit its individual assessments. Such assessments would be levied at a rate of up to one cent per pound, with the initial assessment rate being one cent per pound, from the producer and payment would be remitted by the collecting first handler to the Council. First handlers would be required to maintain records for each producer for whom raspberries for processing are handled, including raspberries produced by the first handler. In addition, first handlers would be required to file reports regarding the collection, payment, or remittance of the assessments to the Council.

The Proposed Order would define importer as any person importing 20,000 or more pounds of processed raspberries into the United States in a calendar year as a principal or as an agent, broker, or consignee of any person who produces or handles processed raspberries outside of the United States for sale in the United States, and who is listed in the import records as the importer of record for such processed raspberries.

Assessments on imported processed raspberries would be collected by Customs at the time of entry into the United States and remitted to the Council. If Customs does not collect an assessment from an importer, the importer would be responsible for paying the assessment directly to the Council. Section 516 (f) of the 1996 Act allows assessments on imported product comparable to the assessment on domestic product. Accordingly, the assessment rate for imported processed raspberries would be up to one cent per pound, with the initial rate being one cent per pound.

Persons failing to remit assessments due in a timely manner may also be subject to actions under the Federal debt collection procedures as set forth in 7 CFR 3.1 through 3.36 for all research and promotion programs administered by the Department [60 FR 12533]. Interest and late payment are also provided for in this Proposed Order.

The Proposed Order allows the Council to recommend to the Secretary an increase or decrease to the assessment rate, if it deems appropriate and if approved by at least one vote more than 50 percent of the total votes of members present at a meeting of the Council. The initial assessment will be levied at a rate of one cent per pound on all processed raspberries. Thereafter, the assessment rate will be levied at a rate of up to one cent per pound on all processed raspberries. The assessment rate will be reviewed, and increased or decreased as recommended by the Council and approved by the Secretary after the first referendum is conducted as stated in § 1208.71 (b). Such an increase or decrease may occur not more than once annually. Any change in the assessment rate shall be subject to rulemaking by the Department, and will be reviewed, and increased or decreased by the Secretary through rulemaking as recommended by the Council. Any change in the assessment rate shall be announced by the Council at least 30 days prior to going into effect. The maximum assessment rate authorized is one cent per pound.

All information obtained from persons subject to this Proposed Order as a result of recordkeeping and reporting requirements would be kept confidential by all officers, employees, and agents of the Department and of the Council. This information may be disclosed only if the Secretary considers the information relevant, and the information is revealed in a judicial proceeding or administrative hearing brought at the direction or on the

request of the Secretary or to which the Secretary or any officer of the Department is a party. Other exceptions for disclosure of confidential information would include the issuance of general statements based on reports or on information relating to a number of persons subject to an order, if the statements do not identify the information furnished by any person or the publication; and by direction of the Secretary of the name of any person violating the Proposed Order and a statement of the particular provisions of the Proposed Order violated by the person.

Under the Proposed Order producers and importers of less than 20,000 pounds a year of raspberries for processing and processed raspberries respectively, are exempt from paying assessments. In addition, a producer who operates under an approved National Organic Program (NOP) system plan, produces only products eligible to be labeled as 100 percent organic under the NOP, and is not a split operation, is exempt from the paying assessments under the Proposed Order. An importer who imports only products eligible to be labeled as 100 percent organic under the NOP, and is not a split operation, also is exempt from paying assessments.

As the Proposed Order provides, producers and importers will be responsible for paying assessments, however, the collection of assessments will be the responsibility of the first handler receiving the raspberries for processing or Customs for imported product. The Proposed Order states that producers, handlers, and importers will also be responsible for filing reports and maintaining records regarding the amount of raspberries that were delivered for processing and the assessments collected.

First handlers would be required to file reports and maintain records on the total raspberries that were delivered for processing from producers or the handling for their own product, on the total number of pounds handled; number of pounds on which an assessment was collected; name and address of the persons from whom the first handler collected assessments on each pound handled; and the date the collection of assessments was made on each pound handled. In addition, producers would be required to provide the Council periodically such information as may be required by the Council. The Council would recommend to the Department specific reporting periods and dates when such reports are due to the Council.

Unless otherwise provided by Customs, importers would be required to report the total amount of processed raspberries imported during such period, including the quantity, date, country of origin, and port of entry. Under the Proposed Order, Customs would collect assessments on imported processed raspberries and remit the funds to the Council.

Each first handler, producer, and importer of processed raspberries, including those who would be exempt from paying assessments under the Proposed Order, would be required to maintain any books and records necessary to carry out the provisions of the Proposed Order for two years beyond the fiscal period to which they apply. This would include the books and records necessary to verify any required reports. These books and records would be made available to the Council's or Department's employees or agents during normal business hours for inspection if necessary.

Section 515 of the 1996 Act provides for the establishment of a board or council consisting of producers, first handlers, and others in the marketing chain, as appropriate. The Department would appoint members to the Council from nominees submitted in accordance with a Proposed Order. The Proposed Order would provide for the establishment of the Processed Raspberry Promotion, Research, and Information Order, under AMS oversight. The WRRC proposed that the Council be composed of thirteen members and their alternates. The Department made a slight revision to the distribution of members originally proposed by the WRRC to comply with geographical distribution of the production as required under the 1996 Act. The proposed Council membership is as follows: Six processed raspberry producer members from States producing a minimum of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing; one processed raspberry producer member representing all other States that produce less than the minimum of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing; three processed raspberry importer members; two foreign producers from countries exporting a minimum of three million pounds of raspberries for processing to the U.S. based on a three-year average; and one at-large member recommended by the Council.

Under the Proposed Order, the Council members and alternates will serve for a term of three years and be able to serve a maximum of two consecutive terms. When the Council is first established, four producer members, two importers, one at-large member, and one foreign producer and their respective alternates will be assigned initial terms of three years; and, three producer members, one importer members, and one foreign producer member and their respective alternates will serve an initial term of two years. Thereafter, each of these positions will carry a full three-year term. Members serving an initial term of two years will be eligible to serve a second three year term to complete their eligibility. Council nominations and appointments will take place in two out of every three years. Each term of office will end on December 31, with new terms of office beginning on January 1.

Producers and importers would represent those entities in the United States. The United States would be defined to include collectively the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the territories and possessions of the United States.

The nominations for the six producer and alternate members from States producing a minimum three-year average of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing will be submitted to the Council in the following manner: (1) For those States that have a State raspberry commission or State marketing order, the State commission or committee will nominate producers and their alternates to serve; or (2) for those States that do not have a State commission or State marketing order, the Council will seek nominations from the State Departments of Agriculture for members and alternates from the specific States.

For those States producing a minimum three-year average of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing that have a State raspberry commission or State marketing order, the State commission or committee nominations will be returned to the Council and placed on a ballot which will then be sent to producers in the State for a vote. The nominee for member will have received the highest number of votes cast. The person with the second highest number of votes cast will be the nominee for alternate. The persons with the third and fourth place highest number of votes cast will be designated as additional nominees for consideration by the Secretary. Once the Council has received all of the nominations from commissions or committees, the information will be submitted to the Secretary for appointment. Nominations for the initial Council will be handled by the Department. Subsequent nominations will be handled by the Council staff and shall be submitted to

the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office.

If the Department determines that there are no State raspberry commissions or State marketing orders from States producing a minimum three-year average of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing, the Council will seek nominations from the State Departments of Agriculture for members and alternates from the specific States who may directly submit nominations to the Department for the initial Council. Subsequent nominations shall be submitted to the Council and will be handled by the Council staff who in turn shall submit those nominations to the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office.

The distribution of the six producer and alternate seats will be proportional to the percentage determined by the average of the total pounds produced and delivered to processors for processing over the previous three years divided by the average total pounds produced over the previous three years. For example, if Washington State and Oregon are the only two States producing a minimum of 3 million pounds each, and Washington's previous three year average is 62.4 million pounds and Oregon's previous three year average is 6.7 million pounds with the average total pounds for the previous three years being 69.1 million pounds, Washington would have 90 percent of the production and Oregon would have 10 percent of the production. Therefore, Washington would obtain five out of the six seats and Oregon would receive one seat.

The nomination for the one raspberry producer of raspberries for processing and alternate member, who represents all other States producing less than a minimum three year average of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing, will constitute a region and the nominations will be submitted to the Council in the following manner: (1) For those States that have a State raspberry commission or State marketing order, the State commission or committee will nominate producers and their alternates to serve; or (2) for those States that do not have a State commission or State marketing order, the Council will seek nominations from the State Departments of Agriculture for the member and alternate from the specific States.

For those States producing less than a minimum three year average of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing that have a State raspberry commission or State marketing order, the State commission or committee nominations will be returned to the Council and placed on a ballot which will then be sent to producers in the Region for a vote. The nominee for member will have received the highest number of votes cast. The person with the second highest number of votes cast will be the nominee for alternate. The persons with the third and fourth place highest number of votes cast will be designated as additional nominees for consideration by the Secretary. Once the Council has received all of the nominations from commissions or committees, the information will be submitted to the Secretary for appointment. Nominations for the initial Council will be handled by the Department. Subsequent nominations will be handled by the Council staff and shall be submitted to the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office.

If the Department determines that there are no State raspberry commissions or State marketing orders from States producing less than a minimum three year average of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing, the Council will seek nominations from the State Departments of Agriculture for members and alternates from the specific States. The State Departments of Agriculture would have the opportunity to participate in nomination caucuses and will directly submit as a group a single slate of nominations to the Department for the producer position and the producer alternate position on the Council for the initial Council. Subsequent nominations shall be submitted to the Council and will be handled by the Council staff who in turn shall submit those nominations to the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office.

Only producers from States that deliver raspberries for processing and pay assessments under the program are eligible for nomination and election to the Council. Average production will be based upon Department production data for the initial nomination and production figures generated by either the Council or the Department thereafter.

Nominations for the three processed raspberry importer member positions and their alternates will be made by qualified national organizations representing importers. Two nominees for each member and each alternate position will be submitted to the Secretary for consideration.

All qualified national organizations representing importers would have the opportunity to participate in nomination caucuses and will submit as a group a single slate of nominations to the Secretary for the importer positions and the importer alternate positions on the Council.

Eligible organizations must submit nominations to the Department not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office. To become a qualified national organization representing importers under the Proposed Order, each such organization would be required to meet the following criteria: (1) Any organization representing importers must represent a substantial number of importers who market a substantial volume of raspberries for processing; (2) it must have a history of stability and permanency and have been in existence for more than one year; (3) it must promote processed raspberry importers' welfare; and (4) it must derive a portion of its operating funds from importers.

If the Department determines that there are no qualified national organizations representing importers, individuals who have paid their assessments to the Council in the most recent fiscal year or for the initial Council those that importers processed raspberries into the U.S. could directly submit nominations to the Department for the initial Council. Subsequent nominations shall be submitted to the Council and will be handled by the Council staff who in turn shall submit those nominations to the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office.

Nominations for the two foreign producer member positions and their alternates will be made by qualified organizations representing foreign producers. Two nominees for each member and each alternate position will be submitted to the Secretary for consideration.

All qualified organizations representing foreign producers would have the opportunity to participate in nomination caucuses and will submit as a group a single slate of nominations per country to the Secretary for foreign producer positions and the foreign producer alternate positions on the Council.

Eligible organizations must submit nominations to the Department not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office. To become a qualified organization representing foreign producers under the Proposed Order, each such organization would be required to meet the following criteria: (1) Any organization representing foreign producers must represent a substantial number of foreign producers who market or produce a substantial volume of raspberries for processing; (2)

it must have a history of stability and permanency and have been in existence for more than one year; (3) it must promote processed raspberry foreign producers' welfare; (4) it must derive a portion of its operating funds from foreign producers; and (5) it must be from a country exporting a minimum of three million pounds of raspberries for processing to the U.S. based on a three-year average.

If the Department determines that they are no qualified organizations representing foreign producer interest, individual foreign producers may directly submit nominations to the Department for the initial Council. Subsequent nominations shall be submitted to the Council and will be handled by the Council staff who in turn shall submit those nominations to the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office.

In recommending the at-large member and alternate, the Council can give consideration to nutrition health professionals and others interested in the raspberry industry. Nominations for the at-large member and alternate will be conducted at a Council meeting by the Council staff and shall be submitted by the Council to the Secretary for approval. Nominations for the initial Council will be handled by the Department. Subsequent nominations will be handled by the Council staff and shall be submitted to the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office.

The 1996 Act provides that to ensure fair and equitable representation, the composition of a board or council shall reflect the geographic distribution of the production of the agriculture commodity in the United States and the quantity or value of the agriculture commodity imported into the United States. The Order states that at least once every five years, but not more frequently than once every three years, the Council will review the geographic distribution of United States production of raspberries for processing and the quantity and source of processed raspberry imports. If warranted, the Council will recommend to the Secretary that membership on the Council be altered to reflect any changes in geographic distribution of domestic raspberry production and the quantity of imports. Also, if the level of imports increases, importer members and alternates may be added to the Council. However, the foreign producer seats will remain the same regardless of the volume of imports from importing countries.

Upon implementation of the Proposed Order and pursuant to the 1996 Act, the Council would at least once in each five-year period, but not more frequently than once in each three-year period review the geographical distribution of processed raspberries in the United States and the quantity of processed raspberries imported into the United States and make a recommendation to the Secretary after considering the results of its review and other information it deems relevant regarding the reapportionment of the Council.

The Proposed Order indicates the Council may recommend to the Department that a member be removed from office if the member consistently refuses to perform his or her duties or engages in dishonest acts or willful misconduct. The Department may remove the member if the Department finds that the Council's recommendation demonstrates cause.

In the event any member or alternate of the Council ceases to be a member of the category from which the member was appointed to the Council, such position will automatically become vacant. Should any member position become vacant the alternate of that member shall automatically assume the position of member.

Under the Proposed Order, a quorum is met when a majority (one more than half) of the Council members is present. An alternate will be counted for the purpose of determining a quorum only if the members for whom the person is the alternate is absent or disqualified from participating. Also, under the Proposed Order, a change for any matter put to the Council will carry if supported by one vote more than 50 percent of the total votes represented by the Council members present.

Under the Proposed Order, the chairperson of the Council must reside in the United States and the Council will be located in the United States.

The Proposed Order states that the Council may not expend for administration, maintenance, and functioning of the Council in any fiscal year an amount that exceeds 15 percent of the assessments and other income received by the Council for that fiscal year.

The Department modified the WRRC's proposal to make it consistent with the 1996 Act and to provide clarity, consistency, and correctness with respect to word usage and terminology. The Department also changed the proposal to make it consistent with other similar national research and promotion programs. Changes made by the Department to the WRRC's proposal include: (1) To add the term processor which is presented in WRRC's proposal; (2) to specify the initial terms of office for the Council and to stagger the terms for future years; (3) to modify the criteria under nominations if a member or alternate is no longer affiliated with the organization he or she was nominated to represent; (4) to modify the four harmonized tariff codes that were presented and reduce it to one harmonized tariff code; (5) to clarify the nomination process for obtaining nominees for both States with State commissions or committees and those that do not have State commissions; (6) to clarify the nomination process for obtaining nominees from the minor States and/or region in which the Council will handle instead of the WRRC; (7) to add reports that may be required by producers and importers; (8) to add the provision under subsequent referenda that the Council may request a referendum be held as stated in the 1996 Act; (9) to clarify the staggered terms of office and that members serving a two year term will only be eligible to serve a second term; (10) to clarify under the procedures that a quorum at a Council meeting will be a majority of the Council members and alternates participating in the meeting; (11) to clarify that any funds borrowed by the Council shall be expended for startup costs and capital outlays and they are limited to the first year of operation of the Council as stated in the 1996 Act; (12) to add language concerning the exemption procedures for organic processed raspberries; (13) to add language concerning the reports that the Council may require of producers and importers; (14) to eliminate the word red from raspberries to conform with the harmonized tariff code; (15) to eliminate voting by proxy; (16) to add language under the procedures requiring that the chairperson and the treasurer reside in the United States; (17) to add language under the procedures requiring all Council meetings to be held in the United States; (18) to add language under the procedures requiring the Council office to be located in the United States; (19) to change the Council's name from United States Raspberry Council to the National Processed Raspberry Council; (20) to add language under the subsequent referendum that complies with the 1996 Act concerning the Council requesting the Secretary to conduct a referendum; (21) to add that importer nominations will be handled by qualified national organizations; (22) to add that foreign producer nominations will be handled by qualified organizations; (23) to add nomination procedures for States producing a minimum of three million

pounds of raspberries delivered for processing, and whose State does not have a State commission or State marketing order; (24) to add nomination procedures for States producing less than a minimum three year average of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing, and whose State does not have a State commission or State marketing order; (25) to add the qualification process to become a qualified organization representing importer or foreign producer interests; and (26) to make a slight revision to the distribution of members originally proposed by the WRRC to comply with geographical distribution of the production as required under the 1996 Act.

The Proposed Order is summarized as follows: 1208.1 through 1208.29 of the Proposed Order define certain terms, such as processed raspberries, first handler, and importer, which are used in the Proposed Order.

Sections 1208.40 through 1208.48 include provisions relating to the Council. These provisions cover establishment and membership, nominations and appointments, term of office, vacancies, alternate members, and procedures for conducting Council business, compensation and reimbursement, and powers and duties of the Council, and prohibited activities. The Council is the governing body authorized to administer the Proposed Order through the implementation of programs, plans, projects, budgets, and contracts to promote and disseminate information about processed raspberries, subject to oversight of the Secretary.

Sections 1208.50 through 1208.56 cover budget review and approval; financial statements; authorize the collection of assessments; specify how assessments would be used, including reimbursement of necessary expenses incurred by the Council for the performance of its duties and expenses incurred for the Department's oversight responsibilities; specify who pays the assessment and how; authorize the imposition of a late-payment charge on past-due assessments; outline exemption procedures; address programs, plans, and projects; require the Council to periodically conduct an independent review of its overall program; and address patents, copyrights, trademarks, information, publications, and product formulations developed through the use of assessment funds.

The proposed assessment rate is up to one cent per pound for domestic processed raspberries and imported processed raspberries, with the initial assessment rate being one cent per pound. The assessment rate will be reviewed, and increased or decreased as recommended by the Council and approved by the Secretary after the first referendum is conducted as stated in § 1208.71 (a). Such an increase or decrease may occur not more than once annually and may not exceed the initial assessment rate of one cent per pound. Any change in the assessment rate shall be subject to rulemaking by the Department, and will be reviewed, and increased or decreased by the Secretary through rulemaking as recommended by the Council. Any change in the assessment rate shall be announced by the Council at least 30 days prior to going into effect. The maximum assessment rate authorized is one cent per pound.

The assessment rate may be raised or lowered at a rate greater than one cent after the initial continuance referendum which would be conducted after the program has been in operation five years. A referendum to approve the new assessment rate or for any other change is not required.

Sections 1208.60 through 1208.62 concerns reporting and recordkeeping requirements for persons subject to the Proposed Order and protect the confidentiality of information from such books, records, or reports.

Sections 1208.70 through 1208.78 describe the rights of the Secretary; address referenda; authorize the Secretary to suspend or terminate the Proposed Order when deemed appropriate; prescribe proceedings after termination; address personal liability, separability, and amendments; and provide OMB control numbers.

While the proposal set forth below has not received the approval of the Department, it is determined that this Proposed Order is consistent with and will effectuate the purposes of the 1996 Act.

For the Proposed Order to become effective, it must be approved by a majority of producers and importers voting for approval in the referendum. Referendum procedures will be published separately in this issue of the
Federal Register
.

A 60-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposal. All written comments received in response to this rule by the date specified would be considered prior to finalizing this action.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1208

Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Consumer information, Marketing agreements, Raspberry promotion, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, it is proposed that Title 7, Chapter XI of the Code of Federal Regulations be amended by adding part 1208 to read as follows:

PART 1208—PROCESSED RASPBERRY PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION ORDER

Subpart A—Processed Raspberry Promotion, Research, and Information Order

Definitions

Sec.
1208.1
Act.
1208.2
Conflict of interest.
1208.3
Crop year.
1208.4
Customs.
1208.5
Department.
1208.6
First handler.
1208.7
Fiscal period.
1208.8
Foreign producer.
1208.9
Handle.
1208.10
Importer.
1208.11
Information.
1208.12
Market or marketing.
1208.13
National Processed Raspberry Council.
1208.14
Order.
1208.15
Part and subpart.
1208.16
Person.
1208.17
Processed raspberries.
1208.18
Processor.
1208.19
Producer.
1208.20
Promotion.
1208.21
Qualified national organization representing importer interests.
1208.22
Qualified organization representing foreign producer interests.
1208.23
Raspberries.
1208.24
Research.
1208.25
Secretary.
1208.26
State.
1208.27
Suspend.
1208.28
Terminate.
1208.29
United States.
National Processed Raspberry Council

1208.40
Establishment and membership.
1208.41
Nominations and appointments.
1208.42
Term of office.
1208.43
Vacancies.
1208.44
Alternate members.
1208.45
Procedure.
1208.46
Compensation and reimbursement.
1208.47
Powers and duties.
1208.48
Prohibited activities.
Expenses and Assessments

1208.50
Budget and expenses.
1208.51
Financial statements.
1208.52
Assessments.
1208.53
Exemption and reimbursement procedures.
1208.54
Programs, plans, and projects.
1208.55
Independent evaluation.
1208.56

Patents, copyrights, trademarks, information, publications, and product formulations.

Reports, Books, and Records

1208.60
Reports.
1208.61
Books and records.
1208.62
Confidential treatment.
Miscellaneous

1208.70
Right of the Secretary.
1208.71
Referenda.
1208.72
Suspension and termination.
1208.73
Proceedings after termination.
1208.74
Effect of termination or amendment.
1208.75
Personal liability.
1208.76
Separability.
1208.77
Amendments.
1208.78
OMB control numbers.

Subpart B—[Reserved]

Authority:

7 U.S.C. 7411-7425; 7 U.S.C. 7401.

Subpart A—Processed Raspberry Promotion, Research, and Information Order

Definitions

§ 1208.1
Act.

Act
means the Commodity Promotion, Research, and Information Act of 1996 (7 U.S.C. 7411-7425), and any amendments thereto.

§ 1208.2
Conflict of interest.

Conflict of interest
means a situation in which a member or employee of the Council has a direct or indirect financial interest in a person who performs a service for, or enters into a contract with, the Council for anything of economic value.

§ 1208.3
Crop year.

Crop year
means the 12-month period from April 1 to March 31 of the following year or such other period approved by the Secretary.

§ 1208.4
Customs.

Customs
means the United States Customs and Border Protection or U.S. Customs Service, an agency of the United States Department of Homeland Security.

§ 1208.5
Department.

Department
means the United States Department of Agriculture or any officer or employee of the Department to whom authority has heretofore been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, to act in the Secretary's stead.

§ 1208.6
First handler.

First handler
means any person (excluding a common or contract carrier) receiving raspberries for processing from producers in a calendar year and who as owner or agent, ships or causes processed raspberries to be shipped as specified in the Order. This definition includes those engaged in the business of buying, selling and/or offering for sale, receiving, packing, grading, marketing, or distributing processed raspberries in commercial quantities. This definition excludes a retailer, except a retailer who purchases or acquires from, or handles on behalf of, any producer of raspberries for processing. The term first handler includes a producer who handles or markets raspberries for processing of the producer's own production.

§ 1208.7
Fiscal period.

Fiscal period
means a calendar year from April 1 through March 31 both dates inclusive, or such other period as approved by the Secretary.

§ 1208.8
Foreign producer.

Foreign producer
means any person:

(a) Who is engaged in the production and sale of raspberries for processing outside of the United States and who owns, or shares the ownership and risk of loss of raspberries for processing for sale in the U.S. market; or

(b) Who is engaged, outside of the United States, in the business of producing, or causing to be produced, processed raspberries beyond the person's own family use and having value at first point of sale.

§ 1208.9
Handle.

Handle
means to pack, process, sell, transport, purchase, or in any other way to place or cause processed raspberries to which one has title or possession to be placed in the current of commerce. Such term shall not include the transportation or delivery of raspberries for processing by the producer thereof to a handler.

§ 1208.10
Importer.

Importer
means any person importing 20,000 pounds or more of processed raspberries into the United States in a calendar year as a principal or as an agent, broker, or consignee of any person who produces or handles processed raspberries outside of the United States for sale in the United States, and who is listed in the import records as the importer of record for such processed raspberries.

§ 1208.11
Information.

Information
means information and programs that are designed to increase efficiency in processing and to develop new markets, marketing strategies, increase market efficiency, and activities that are designed to enhance the image of raspberries on a national basis. These include:

(a)
Consumer information
, which means any action taken to provide information to, and broaden the understanding of, the general public regarding the consumption, use, nutritional attributes, and care of processed raspberries.

(b)
Food industry information,
which means any action taken to provide information to, and broaden the understanding of, the food industry regarding the consumption, use, nutritional attributes, and care of processed raspberries.

(c)
Industry information
, which means any action taken to provide information to or collect information from, and broaden the underestimating of, the raspberry industry regarding the production, consumption, use, nutritional attributes, and care of processed raspberries.

§ 1208.12
Market or marketing.

(a)
Marketing
means the sale or other disposition of processed raspberries in interstate, foreign or intrastate commerce.

(b) To
market
means to sell or otherwise dispose of processed raspberries in any channel of commerce.

§ 1208.13
National Processed Raspberry Council.

National Processed Raspberry Council
or such other name as recommended by the Council and approved by the Department means the administrative body established pursuant to § 1208.40.

§ 1208.14
Order.

Order
means an order issued by the Secretary under section 514 of the Act that provides for a program of generic promotion, research, and information regarding agricultural commodities authorized under the Act.

§ 1208.15
Part and subpart.

Part
means the Processed Raspberry Promotion, Research, and Information Order and all rules, regulations, and supplemental orders issued pursuant to the Act and the Order. The Order shall be a subpart of such part.

§ 1208.16
Person.

Person
means any individual, group of individuals, partnership, corporation, association, cooperative, or any other legal entity.

§ 1208.17
Processed raspberries.

Processed raspberries
means raspberries which have been frozen, dried, pureed, made into juice, or delivered in any other form altered by mechanical processes other than fresh.

§ 1208.18
Processor.

Processor
means a person engaged in the preparation of raspberries for processing for market who owns or who

shares the ownership and risk of loss of such raspberries.

§ 1208.19
Producer.

Producer
means any person who grows 20,000 pounds or more of raspberries for processing in the United States for sale in commerce, or a person who is engaged in the business of producing, or causing to be produced for any market, raspberries for processing beyond the person's own family use and having value at first point of sale.

§ 1208.20
Promotion.

Promotion
means any action taken to present a favorable image of processed raspberries to the general public and the food industry for the purpose of improving the competitive position of processed raspberries both in the United States and abroad and stimulating the sale of processed raspberries including paid advertising and public relations.

§ 1208.21
Qualified national organization representing importer interests.

Qualified national organization representing importer interests
means an organization that the Secretary certifies as being eligible to nominate importer and alternate importer members to the Council.

§ 1208.22
Qualified organization representing foreign producer interests.

Qualified organization representing foreign producer interests
means an organization that the Secretary certifies as being eligible to nominate foreign producer and alternate foreign producer members to the Council.

§ 1208.23
Raspberries.

Raspberries
mean and include all kinds, varieties, and hybrids of cultivated raspberries of the genus “Rubus” grown in or imported into the United States.

§ 1208.24
Research.

Research
means any type of test, study, or analysis designed to advance the image, desirability, use, marketability, production, product development, or quality of raspberries, including but not limited to research relating to nutritional value, cost of production, new product development, health research, and marketing of processed raspberries.

§ 1208.25
Secretary.

Secretary
means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States, or any officer or employee of the Department to whom authority has been delegated, or to whom authority may be delegated, to act in the Secretary's stead.

§ 1208.26
State.

State
means any of the several 50 States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the territories and possessions of the United States.

§ 1208.27
Suspend.

Suspend
means to issue a rule under section 553 of title 5 U.S.C., to temporarily prevent the operation of an order or part thereof during a particular period of time specified in the rule.

§ 1208.28
Terminate.

Terminate
means to issue a rule under section 553 of title 5 U.S.C., to cancel permanently the operation of an order or part thereof beginning on a certain date specified in the rule.

§ 1208.29
United States.

United States
means collectively the 50 states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the territories and possessions of the United States.

National Processed Raspberry Council

§ 1208.40
Establishment and membership.

(a)
Establishment of the National Processed Raspberry Council
. There is hereby established a National Processed Raspberry Council, or such other name as recommended by the Council and approved by the Department, hereinafter called Council, composed of thirteen (13) members and thirteen (13) alternate members, appointed by the Secretary from nominations as follows:

(1) Six (6) processed raspberry producer members and alternate members from States producing a minimum of three (3) million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing. Distribution of the seats among the eligible States shall be proportional to the percent determined by the average of the total pounds produced and delivered to processors for processing over the previous three years divided by the average total pounds by all of the eligible States for the previous three years. Only States whose producers deliver raspberries for processing and pay assessments are eligible for nomination and election to the Council. Average production will be based upon either State production figures or the Department data for the initial election, and production figures generated by either the Council or the Department thereafter;

(2) One (1) processed raspberry producer member and alternate member representing all other States producing less than a three (3) million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing. All States producing less than three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing will constitute a region from which one producer member and alternate will be nominated to the Council. Only States whose producers deliver raspberries for processing and pay assessments are eligible for nomination and election to the Council. Average production will be based upon either State production figures or the Department data for the initial election, and production figures generated by either the Council or the Department thereafter;

(3) Three (3) processed raspberry importer members and alternate members;

(4) Two (2) foreign producers and their alternate members from countries exporting a minimum of three million pounds of raspberries for processing to the U.S., based on a three-year average; and

(5) One (1) at-large member and an alternate recommended by the Council and shall be submitted by the Council to the Secretary for approval. In recommending the at-large member and alternate, the Council shall give consideration to nutrition health professionals and others interested in raspberry industry. Nominations for the initial Council will be handled by the Department.

(b)
Adjustment of membership
. At least once every five years, but not more frequently than once every three years, the Council will review the geographic distribution of United States production of processed raspberries and the quantity and source of processed raspberry imports. The review will be conducted through an audit of State crop production figures and Council assessment receipts. If warranted, the Council will recommend to the Secretary that membership on the Council be altered to reflect any changes in geographic distribution of domestic raspberry production for processing and the quantity of imports. If the level of imports increases or decreases, importer members and alternates may be added or reduced on the Council, subject to recommendation by the Council and approval of the Secretary. However, the foreign producer seats will remain the same regardless of the volume of imports from importing countries.

§ 1208.41
Nominations and appointments.
(a) Voting for regional and State producer representatives will be made by mail ballot.

(b) Nominations for the initial Council will be handled by the Department. Subsequent nominations will be handled by the Council.

(c) The nominations for the six producer and alternate members from States producing a minimum three year average of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing will be submitted to the Council in the following manner:

(1) For those States that have a State raspberry commission or State marketing order, the State commission or committee will nominate producers and their alternates to serve. Nominations will be returned to the Council and placed on a ballot which will then be sent to producers in the State for a vote. The nominee for member will have received the highest number of votes cast. The person with the second highest number of votes cast will be the nominee for alternate. The persons with the third and fourth place highest number of votes cast will be designated as additional nominees for consideration by the Secretary. Once the Council has received all of the nominations from commissions or committees, the information will be submitted to the Secretary for appointment. Nominations for the initial Council will be handled by the Department. Subsequent nominations will be handled by the Council staff and shall be submitted to the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office; or

(2) For those States that do not have a State commission or State marketing order, the Council will seek nominations from the State Departments of Agriculture for members and alternates from the specific States who may directly submit nominations to the Department for the initial Council. Subsequent nominations shall be submitted to the Council and will be handled by the Council staff who in turn shall submit those nominations to the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office.

(3) The distribution of the six producer and alternate seats will be proportional to the percentage determined by the average of the total pounds produced and delivered to processors for processing over the previous three years divided by the average total pounds produced over the previous three years.

(d) The nomination for the one raspberry producer of raspberries for processing and alternate member, who represents all other States producing less than a minimum three year average of three million pounds of raspberries delivered for processing, will constitute a region and the nominations will be submitted to the Council in the following manner:

(1) For those States that have a State raspberry commission or State marketing order, the State commission or committee will nominate producers and their alternates to serve. The State commission or committee nominations will be returned to the Council and placed on a ballot which will then be sent to producers in the Region for a vote. The nominee for member will have received the highest number of votes cast. The person with the second highest number of votes cast will be the nominee for alternate. The persons with the third and fourth place highest number of votes cast will be designated as additional nominees for consideration by the Secretary. Once the Council has received all of the nominations from commissions or committees, the information will be submitted to the Secretary for appointment. Nominations for the initial Council will be handled by the Department. Subsequent nominations will be handled by the Council staff and shall be submitted to the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office; or

(2) For those States that do not have a State commission or State marketing order, the Council will seek nominations from the State Departments of Agriculture for the member and alternate from the specific States. The State Departments of Agriculture would have the opportunity to participate in nomination caucuses and will directly submit as a group a single slate of nominations to the Department for the producer position and the producer alternate position on the Council for the initial Council. Subsequent nominations shall be submitted to the Council and will be handled by the Council staff who in turn shall submit those nominations to the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the term of office.

(e) Only producers from States that deliver raspberries for processing and are covered under the program are eligible for nomination and election to the Council. Average production will be based upon Department production data for the initial nomination and production figures generated by either the Council or the Department thereafter.

(f) Nominations for the importer positions and their alternates will be made by qualified national organizations representing importers as follows:

(1) All qualified national organizations representing importers would have the opportunity to participate in nomination caucuses and will submit as a group a single slate of nominations to the Secretary for the importer positions and the importer alternate positions on the Council. Eligible organizations must submit nominations to the Department not less than 90 days prior to the expiration o

[Text truncated at 120,000 characters. The full text is on the page linked above.]

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/fr%3AE9-7981. Public record. Not legal advice.