# Auction of 700 MHz Band Licenses Scheduled for January 24, 2008; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Reserved Prices, Upfront Payments and Other Procedures for Auctions 73 and 76

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/fr%3AE7-21528

## Record

- **Collection:** Federal Register
- **Document type:** Notice
- **Published:** November 2, 2007
- **Citation:** 72 FR 62360

## Text

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[AU Docket No. 07-157; Report No. AUC-07-73-B (Auctions 73 and 76); DA 07-4171]
Auction of 700 MHz Band Licenses Scheduled for January 24, 2008; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Reserved Prices, Upfront Payments and Other Procedures for Auctions 73 and 76

AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION:

Notice.

SUMMARY:

This document announces the procedures and minimum opening bids for the upcoming auction of certain 700 MHz Band Licenses (Auctions 73 and 76). This document is intended to familiarize prospective bidders with the procedures and minimum opening bids for these auctions.

DATES:

Applications to participate in 700 MHz Band Licenses Auctions 73 and 76 must be filed before 6 p.m. ET on December 3, 2007. Bidding for Auction No. 73 is scheduled to begin on January 24, 2008. Contingent subsequent bidding in Auction 76, if necessary, will begin on a date to be announced after Auction 73 has closed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Auctions Spectrum and Access Division: For legal questions: Scott Mackoul, Stephen Johnson or Howard Davenport at (202) 418-0660. For general auction questions: Lisa Stover at (717) 338-2868. Mobility Division: For service rule questions: Erin McGraft (legal), Keith Harper (engineering) and Denise Walter (licensing) at (202) 418-0620. To request materials in accessible formats (Braille, large print, electronic files or audio format) for people with disabilities, send an e-mail to
fcc504@fcc.gov
or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a summary of the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice
released on October 5, 2007. The complete text of the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice,
including attachments, as well as related Commission documents are available for public inspection and copying from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) Monday through Thursday or from 8 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on Friday at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. On October 19, 2007, a Public Notice was released announcing a change in the date of the bidders' seminar for Auctions 73 and 76 from November 19, 2007 to November 20, 2007. The
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice
and related Commission documents may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-488-5300, facsimile 202-488-5563, or Web site:
http://www.BCPIWEB.com.
When ordering documents from BCPI, please provide the appropriate FCC document number, for example, DA 07-4171 for the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice.
The
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice
and related documents are also available on the Internet at the Commission's Web site:
http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/73/.

I. General Information

A. Introduction

1. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (the Bureau) announces the procedures and minimum opening bid amounts for the upcoming auction of licenses for services in the 698-806 MHz band (700 MHz Band) scheduled to begin on January 24, 2008. This auction is designated as Auction 73. Auction 73 will offer 700 MHz Band licenses for initial bidding and the 700 MHz Band licenses may be offered in contingent subsequent bidding. In the event that any licenses are offered in contingent subsequent bidding, that event will be designated as Auction 76. On August 17, 2007, in accordance with Section 309(j)(3) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, the Bureau released a public notice seeking comment on competitive bidding procedures for both the initial bidding and the contingent subsequent bidding for
700 MHz Band licenses.
Interested parties submitted 12 comments and 8 reply comments in response to the
700 MHz Auction Public Notice,
72 FR 48272, August 23, 2007, as well as a number of
ex parte
communications.

2. In the
700 MHz Auction Public Notice,
the Bureau proposed to include all available, commercial 700 MHz Band licenses (1,099 licenses) for initial bidding in Auction 73 using the Commission's standard simultaneous multiple-round (SMR) auction format for the A, B, D, and E block licenses and an auction design with hierarchical package bidding (HPB) for the C Block licenses. The
700 MHz Auction Public Notice
also proposed procedures for the contingent subsequent bidding, now designated Auction 76, on licenses for spectrum associated with any initially offered licenses for which the Auction 73 results do not satisfy applicable reserve prices. Based on the record and after considering comments provided in response to the
700 MHz Auction Public Notice,
the Bureau hereby announces the final procedures for Auctions 73 and Auction 76.

3. The
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice
provides, among other things, procedures for the following: (1) Anonymous bidding, to enhance competition by safeguarding against potential anti-competitive auction strategies; (2) package bidding, to enable bidders trying to combine multiple C Block licenses to place bids on packages of those licenses; (3) block-specific aggregate reserve prices, to help assure that the public recovers a portion of the value of the spectrum resource; and (4) prompt subsequent bidding in Auction 76, to offer licenses for relevant block(s) in the event Auction 73 results do not satisfy applicable reserve prices.

4.
Anonymous Bidding.
In the
700 MHz Second Report and Order,
65 FR 17594, April, 4, 2000, the Commission found that the public interest would be served if the auction for new 700 MHz Band licenses is conducted using anonymous (or limited information) bidding procedures, regardless of any pre-auction measurement of likely auction competition. Such information procedures are intended to reduce the potential for anti-competitive bidding behavior, including bidding activity that aims to prevent the entry of new competitors. Having proposed and sought comment on more detailed procedures for employing anonymous bidding for the upcoming auction, the Bureau now announces the anonymous bidding procedures.

5.
Package Bidding for C Block Licenses.
The Commission also determined in the
700 MHz Second Report and Order
that providing for package bidding for C Block licenses would serve the public interest. The Commission found that package bidding for these licenses should facilitate the entry of entities seeking to create a nationwide footprint and whose business plans require the economies of scale that only can be obtained with nationwide operation. At Commission direction, the Bureau previously proposed and sought comment on detailed procedures for implementing package bidding for the C Block licenses and not for licenses in the other blocks to be auctioned. In the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice,
the Bureau detailed the process for package bidding for the C Block licenses.

6.
Block-Specific Aggregate Reserve Prices.
The Commission also decided to

provide for aggregate reserve prices for licenses authorizing the use of each block of the commercial 700 MHz Band yet to be licensed. The Commission concluded that, consistent with its statutory mandate, disclosed reserve prices would promote the recovery of a portion of the value of the public spectrum resource. The Commission directed the Bureau to adopt aggregate reserve prices reflecting the potential market value of this spectrum based on a variety of factors including, but not limited to, the characteristics of this band and the auction prices of other recently auctioned licenses, such as licenses for Advanced Wireless Services in the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands (AWS-1). Accordingly, the Bureau proposed and sought comment on the following block-specific aggregate reserve prices: Block A, $1.807380 billion; Block B, $1.374426 billion; Block C, $4.637854 billion; Block D, $1.330000 billion; Block E, $0.903690 billion. Further, the Bureau proposed that if the sum of the provisionally winning bids for the licenses in a block does not satisfy the relevant aggregate reserve price, none of the relevant licenses for the particular block will be assigned based on the auction results. In the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice,
the Bureau adopted this proposal.

7.
Auction 76 Overview.
The Commission decided that, if licenses initially offered for the A, B, C, or E Blocks are not assigned because the auction results do not satisfy the applicable aggregate reserve price(s) for those licenses, the Commission promptly will offer alternative licenses for those blocks. More specifically, the Commission will offer licenses for the A, B, and E Blocks subject to alternative performance requirements. With respect to the C Block, the Commission will offer alternative licenses without the open platform conditions and based on different geographic areas and spectrum bandwidth. If the D Block license is not assigned because the auction results do not satisfy the D Block reserve price, the Commission may re-offer that license subject to the same rules or reconsider the applicable rules. For administrative purposes, the Bureau will designate as Auction 76 any subsequent bidding for alternative licenses for the A, B, C or E Blocks or for the D Block license that occurs because Auction 73 results for licenses initially offered for the relevant blocks do not satisfy the applicable aggregate reserve price(s). In the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice,
the Bureau announced detailed procedures for conducting Auction 76, if necessary.

8. The Commission will conduct bidding in Auction 73 and any contingent subsequent bidding in Auction 76 for 700 MHz Band licenses as a single auction to the extent possible, given the strong public interest in promptly assigning all 700 MHz Band licenses for recovered analog spectrum and the related nature of the licenses being offered in Auctions 73 and 76. Thus, pursuant to the
700 MHz Second Report and Order,
the Bureau will permit only qualified bidders in the initial auction to participate in the contingent subsequent auction. To enable a prompt start to Auction 76 after Auction 73, applicants must select any licenses on which they may bid in Auction 76 by the deadline for filing their Auction 73 application. Applicants must select those licenses by submitting a separate abbreviated short-form application to participate in Auction 76. The abbreviated Auction 76 application must be filed together with the applicant's standard application for Auction 73, following procedures described in the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice.
In the event that Auction 76 takes place, bidder identity and other information on the applicant's completed Auction 73 short-form application will be combined with the licenses selected in the abbreviated Auction 76 application to create the applicant's Auction 76 application. This process will minimize the time period between auctions by eliminating any need for applicants to take time following Auction 73 to file new applications or select additional licenses, and for the Commission to review newly-filed short-form applications. Applicants in Auction 76, however, will have an opportunity after Auction 73 to obtain additional eligibility for any licenses offered in Auction 76 by supplementing their upfront monies on deposit with the Commission pursuant to the procedures as provided for in the
700 MHz Second Report and Order.

9. The Bureau also will use the Auction 73 design in Auction 76, including an aggregate reserve price for each block that matches the applicable initial reserve price. In the event that alternative licenses for the C Block are offered for Blocks C1 and C2, the Bureau will conduct package bidding for the C2 Block only, using the pre-determined packages. Alternative licenses for Blocks C1 and C2 will be subject to reserve prices. There will be a joint aggregate reserve price equal to the initial auction C Block aggregate reserve price, and separate aggregate reserve prices for the C1 and C2 Blocks that add to the joint aggregate reserve price. Licenses in both blocks will be assigned if the joint aggregate reserve price is met. If the joint aggregate reserve price is not met but one of the block-specific reserve prices is met, licenses in the block for which the reserve price is met will be assigned. Licenses in the other block will not be assigned. This will assure the aggregate reserve price in the initial auction continues to apply while maximizing the opportunity for licenses for either Block C1 or C2 to be assigned.

i. Background of Proceeding

10. The Commission is offering the licenses in Auction 73 consistent with the requirements of the Digital Television Transition and Public Safety Act of 2005 (DTV Act). Pursuant to the DTV Act the Commission must conduct the auction of licenses for recovered analog spectrum by commencing the bidding not later than January 28, 2008. A number of incumbent broadcasters are licensed and operating on these frequencies (TV Channels 52-53, 56-58, 60-62, and 65-67) and adjacent channels.

ii. Licenses To Be Offered in Auction 73

11. Auction 73 will offer a total of 1,099 licenses: 176 Economic Area (EA) licenses in each of the A and E Blocks, 734 Cellular Market Area (CMA) licenses in the B Block, 12 Regional Economic Area Grouping (REAG) licenses in the C Block, and one nationwide license, to be used as part of the 700 MHz Public/Private Partnership, in the D Block.

B. Rules and Disclaimers

i. Relevant Authority

12. Prospective applicants must familiarize themselves thoroughly with the Commission's general competitive bidding rules set forth in Title 47, part 1, of the CFR, including recent amendments and clarifications; rules relating to the 700 MHz Band contained in Title 47, part 27, of the CFR; rules relating to the public/private partnership applicable to the D Block contained in Title 47, part 90, of the CFR; and rules relating to applications, environment, practice and procedure contained in Title 47, part 1, of the CFR. Prospective applicants must also be thoroughly familiar with the procedures, terms and conditions (terms) contained in the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice
and the Commission's decisions in proceedings regarding competitive bidding procedures, application requirements, and obligations of

Commission licensees. For example, among other Commission orders, prospective bidders should be familiar with the
700 MHz First Report and Order,
65 FR 3139, January 20, 2000, and the
700 MHz Second Report and Order.

13. The terms contained in the Commission's rules, relevant orders, and public notices are not negotiable. The Commission may amend or supplement the information contained in its public notices at any time, and will issue public notices to convey any new or supplemental information to applicants. It is the responsibility of all applicants to remain current with all Commission rules and with all public notices pertaining to Auctions 73 and 76.

ii. Prohibition of Collusion; Compliance With Antitrust Laws

14. To ensure the competitiveness of the auction process, § 1.2105(c) of the Commission's rules prohibits auction applicants for licenses in any of the same geographic license areas from communicating with each other about bids, bidding strategies, or settlements 9 unless such applicants have identified each other on their short-form applications (FCC Forms 175) as parties with whom they have entered into agreements pursuant to § 1.2105(a)(2)(viii).

a. Entities Subject to Anti-Collusion Rule

15. The anti-collusion rule will apply to any applicants that submit short-form applications for Auctions 73 or 76 and select licenses in the same or overlapping CMAs, EAs, REAGs or the nationwide license in the D Block. For example, assume that one applicant applies for a REAG license and a second applicant applies for an EA license covering any area within that REAG. The two entities will have applied for licenses covering the same geographic areas and would be precluded from communicating with each other under the rule. The rule also applies where one applicant has selected a license in Auction 73 and another applicant selects a license in Auction 76 that covers any of the same geographic area. In addition, the rule precludes applicants that apply to bid for the nationwide license in the D Block, or all the licenses in any other block, from communicating with all other applicants. Thus, applicants that have applied for licenses covering the same markets (unless they have identified each other on their FCC Form 175 applications as parties with whom they have entered into agreements under § 1.2105(a)(2)(viii)) must affirmatively avoid all communications with or disclosures to each other that affect or have the potential to affect bids or bidding strategy, which may include communications regarding the post-auction market structure. This prohibition applies to all applicants regardless of whether such applicants become qualified bidders or actually bid. Information concerning applicants' license selections will not be available to the public. Therefore, the Commission will inform each applicant by letter of the identity of each of the other applicants that has applied for licenses covering any of the same geographic areas as the licenses that it has selected in its short-form application.

16. For purposes of this prohibition, § 1.2105(c)(7)(i) defines applicant as including all officers and directors of the entity submitting a short-form application to participate in the auction, all controlling interests of that entity, as well as all holders of partnership and other ownership interests and any stock interest amounting to 10 percent or more of the entity, or outstanding stock, or outstanding voting stock of the entity submitting a short-form application.

17. Entities and parties subject to the anti-collusion rule should take special care in circumstances where their employees may receive information directly or indirectly from a competing applicant relating to any competing applicant's bids or bidding strategies. In situations where the anti-collusion rule views the same person as the applicant with respect to two different entities filing competing applications, under Bureau precedent the bids and bidding strategies of one applicant are necessarily conveyed to the other and, absent a disclosed bidding agreement, an apparent violation of the anti-collusion rule occurs. The Bureau has not addressed situations where employees who do not qualify as the applicant, (e.g., are not officers or directors) receive information regarding a competing applicant's bids or bidding strategies and whether that information might be deemed to necessarily convey to the applicant. The Bureau notes that the exception to the anti-collusion rule providing that non-controlling interest holders may have interests in more than one competing bidder without violating the anti-collusion rule, provided specified conditions are met (including a certification that no prohibited communications have occurred or will occur), does not extend to controlling interest holders.

b. Prohibition Applies Until Down Payment Deadline

18. Section 1.2105(c)'s anti-collusion prohibition begins at the short-form application filing deadline and ends at the down payment deadline after the auction. In recognition of the related nature of the initial auction and any contingent auction of alternative licenses, the Commission concluded in the
700 MHz Second Report and Order
that the provisions of the anti-collusion rule would continue to apply until the down payment deadline for the subsequent auction.

19. Some commenters argue that the Bureau should allow applicants to opt-out from the anti-collusion prohibition in the event Auction 76 is conducted. A commenter proposed that an applicant that has no intention to bid in the subsequent auction could inform the Commission of its intent in writing with a certification that its decision is not based on any discussion with other competing bidders of auction strategy or post-auction market structure. As one commenter acknowledges, changing the application of the rule in this way is beyond the Bureau's delegated authority and beyond the scope of this non-rulemaking proceeding and would require action by the Commission to reconsider its determination in the
700 MHz Second Report and Order
. Thus, the Bureau is unable to adopt the proposed opt-out certification procedure. If it is necessary to conduct Auction 76, the provisions of the anti-collusion rule will apply to all applicants until the down payment deadline, which will occur after the close of bidding on licenses offered in Auction 76.

c. Prohibited Communications

20. Prospective applicants for upcoming Auctions 73 and 76 and other parties that may be engaged in discussion with such prospective applicants are cautioned of the need to comply with the Commission's anti-collusion rule, § 1.2105(c). The anti-collusion rule prohibits not only a communication about an applicant's own bids or bidding strategy, but also a communication of another applicant's bids or bidding strategy. While the anti-collusion rule provisions do not prohibit business negotiations among auction applicants, applicants must remain vigilant so as not to communicate directly or indirectly information that affects, or could affect, bids or bidding strategy, or the negotiation of settlement agreements.

21. The Commission remains vigilant about prohibited communications

taking place in other situations. For example, the Commission has warned that prohibited communications concerning bids and bidding strategies may include communications regarding capital calls or requests for additional funds in support of bids or bidding strategies to the extent such communications convey information concerning the bids and bidding strategies directly or indirectly.

22. Applicants are hereby placed on notice that public disclosure of information relating to bidder interests and bidder identities that is confidential in both Auctions 73 and 76 at the time of disclosure may violate the anti-collusion rule. This is so even though similar types of information were revealed prior to and during other Commission auctions subject to different information procedures. Bidders should use caution in their dealings with other parties, such as members of the press, financial analysts, or others who might become a conduit for the communication of prohibited bidding information. For example, where limited information disclosure procedures are in place, as for Auctions 73 and 76, a qualified bidder's statement to the press that it has lost bidding eligibility and stopped bidding in the auction could give rise to a finding of an anti-collusion rule violation. Similarly, an applicant's public statement of intent not to participate in Auction 76 bidding could also violate the rule.

23. Applicants for licenses for any of the same geographic license areas must not communicate directly or indirectly about bids or bidding strategy. Accordingly, such applicants are encouraged not to use the same individual as an authorized bidder. A violation of the anti-collusion rule could occur if an individual acts as the authorized bidder for two or more competing applicants, and conveys information concerning the substance of bids or bidding strategies between such applicants. Also, if the authorized bidders are different individuals employed by the same organization (e.g., law firm or engineering firm or consulting firm), a violation similarly could occur. In such a case, at a minimum, applicants should certify on their applications that precautionary steps have been taken to prevent communication between authorized bidders and that applicants and their bidding agents will comply with the anti-collusion rule. A violation of the anti-collusion rule could occur in other contexts, such as an individual serving as an officer for two or more applicants. Moreover, the Commission has found a violation of the anti-collusion rule where a bidder used the Commission's bidding system to disclose its bidding strategy in a manner that explicitly invited other auction participants to cooperate and collaborate in specific markets, and has placed auction participants on notice that the use of its bidding system to disclose market information to competitors will not be tolerated and will subject bidders to sanctions.

24. In addition, when completing short-form applications, applicants should avoid any statements or disclosures that may violate the Commission's anti-collusion rule, particularly in light of the Commission's procedures for limited information. Specifically, applicants should avoid including any information in their short-form applications that might convey information regarding their license selection, such as using applicant names that refer to licenses being offered, referring to certain licenses or markets in describing bidding agreements, or including any information in attachments that may otherwise disclose applicants' license selections.

d. Disclosure of Bidding Agreements and Arrangements

25. The Commission's rules do not prohibit applicants from entering into otherwise lawful bidding agreements before filing their short-form applications, as long as they disclose the existence of the agreement(s) in their short-form application. If parties agree in principle on all material terms prior to the short-form filing deadline, each party to the agreement must identify the other party or parties to the agreement on its short-form application under § 1.2105(c), even if the agreement has not been reduced to writing. If the parties have not agreed in principle by the short-form filing deadline, they should not include the names of parties to discussions on their applications, and they may not continue negotiations, discussions or communications with any other applicants for licenses covering any of the same or overlapping geographic areas after the short-form filing deadline.

e. Anti-Collusion Certification

26. By electronically submitting a short-form application following the electronic filing procedures set forth in Attachments D and E to the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice
, each applicant certifies its compliance with § 1.2105(c). However, the Bureau cautions that merely filing a certifying statement as part of an application will not outweigh specific evidence that collusive behavior has occurred, nor will it preclude the initiation of an investigation when warranted. The Commission has stated that it intends to scrutinize carefully any instances in which bidding patterns suggest that collusion may be occurring. Any applicant found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions.

f. Antitrust Laws

27. Applicants are also reminded that, regardless of compliance with the Commission's rules, they remain subject to the antitrust laws, which are designed to prevent anticompetitive behavior in the marketplace. Compliance with the disclosure requirements of the Commission's anti-collusion rule will not insulate a party from enforcement of the antitrust laws. For instance, a violation of the antitrust laws could arise out of actions taking place well before any party submits a short-form application. The Commission has cited a number of examples of potentially anticompetitive actions that would be prohibited under antitrust laws: For example, actual or potential competitors may not agree to divide territories horizontally in order to minimize competition, regardless of whether they split a market in which they both do business, or whether they merely reserve one market for one and another for the other. Similarly, the Bureau has long reminded potential applicants and others that even where the applicant discloses parties with whom it has reached an agreement on the short-form application, thereby permitting discussions with those parties, the applicant is nevertheless subject to existing antitrust laws. To the extent the Commission becomes aware of specific allegations that suggest that violations of the federal antitrust laws may have occurred, the Commission may refer such allegations to the United States Department of Justice for investigation. If an applicant is found to have violated the antitrust laws or the Commission's rules in connection with its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions, among other sanctions.

28. One commenter urges the Commission to adopt an auction rule that states that a bidder cannot release any bidding information to the public during the course of the auction, and provide notice that all parties remain subject to the antitrust laws. As another commenter points out, however, the

Commission has consistently provided such guidance in prior auctions. The Bureau does so again here: All parties remain subject to the antitrust laws.

g. Duty to Report Prohibited Communications

29. If an applicant makes or receives a communication that appears to violate the anti-collusion rule, it must report such communication in writing to the Commission immediately and in no case later than five business days after the communication occurs. The Commission recently clarified that each applicant's obligation to report any such communication continues beyond the five-day period after the communication is made, even if the report is not made within the five day period.

30. Section 1.65 of the Commission's rules requires an applicant to maintain the accuracy and completeness of information furnished in its pending application and to notify the Commission within 30 days of any substantial change that may be of decisional significance to that application. Thus, § 1.65 requires an auction applicant to notify the Commission of any substantial change to the information or certifications included in its pending short-form application. Applicants are therefore required by § 1.65 to report to the Commission any communications they have made to or received from another applicant after the short-form filing deadline that affect or have the potential to affect bids or bidding strategy unless such communications are made to or received from parties to agreements identified under § 1.2105(a)(2)(viii).

31. Applicants must be aware that failure to comply with the Commission's rules can result in enforcement action.

h. Winning Bidders Must Disclose Terms of Agreements

32. Applicants that are winning bidders will be required to disclose in their long-form applications the specific terms, conditions, and parties involved in any bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process.

i. Additional Information Concerning Anti-Collusion Rule

33. A summary listing of documents issued by the Commission and the Bureau addressing the application of the anti-collusion rule may be found in Attachment I of the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice
. These documents are available on the Commission's auction anti-collusion Web page.

iii. Protection of Incumbent Operations

34. A number of incumbent broadcasters are licensed and operating on these frequencies (TV Channels 52-53, 56-58, 60-62, and 65-67) and adjacent channels. In accordance with the Commission's rules, 700 MHz Band licensees must protect analog and digital TV incumbents from harmful interference through February 17, 2009, the end of the DTV transition period. After February 17, 2009, 700 MHz licensees must continue to operate in accordance with the Commission's rules to reduce the potential for interference to public reception of the signals of DTV broadcast stations transmitting on DTV Channel 51. These limitations may restrict the ability of such geographic area licensees to use certain portions of the electromagnetic spectrum or provide service to some parts of their geographic license areas.

35. In the
700 MHz Second Report and Order
, the Commission grandfathered an incumbent guard band B Block licensee in Major Economic Areas (MEAs) 21 and 39 at 761-763 MHz and 791-793 MHz of the D Block. The new D Block licensee will be authorized on a secondary basis at 761-763 MHz and 791-793 MHz in these markets, and it may not cause interference to the primary operations of the grandfathered licensee. If the grandfathered licensee, or a successor or assignee, cancels either of the grandfathered licenses, or if either license cancels automatically, is terminated by the Commission, or expires, then the licensed geographic area will revert to the D Block licensee automatically.

a. International Coordination

36. Potential bidders seeking licenses for geographic areas that are near the Canadian or Mexican borders are subject to international agreements with Canada and Mexico. Pursuant to these agreements, the U.S. must protect the signals of Canadian and Mexican television broadcast stations located in the border area. Unless otherwise modified by international treaty, licensees must not cause interference to, and must accept harmful interference from, television broadcast operations in Mexico and Canada. Further, until such time as existing agreements are replaced or modified to reflect the new uses, licensees in the band will be subject to existing agreements.

b. Quiet Zones

37. 700 MHz Band licensees must protect the radio quiet zones set forth in the Commission's rules. Licensees are cautioned that they must receive the appropriate approvals directly from the relevant quiet zone entity prior to operating within the areas described in the Commission's rules.

iv. Due Diligence

38. The Bureau cautions potential applicants formulating their bidding strategies to investigate and consider the extent to which 700 MHz Band frequencies are occupied. Applicants and their investors should also understand that Commission rules and requirements place limitations on the ability of 700 MHz Band licensees to use this spectrum. There are a number of incumbent broadcast television licensees already licensed and operating in the band that will be subject to the upcoming auction. Geographic area licensees operating on the spectrum associated with Channels 52-53, 56-58, 60-62, and 65-67 must comply with the co-channel and the adjacent channel provision of § 27.60 of the Commission's rules. These limitations may restrict the ability of such geographic area licensees to use certain portions of the electromagnetic spectrum or provide service to certain areas in their geographic license areas. For example, bidders should become familiar with any petitions or other pleadings filed in response to the
700 MHz First Report and Order, 700 MHz Second Report and Order
, and any other orders that have been or may be released affecting the 700 MHz Band.

39. Potential bidders are reminded that they are solely responsible for investigating and evaluating all technical and marketplace factors that may have a bearing on the value of 700 MHz Band licenses. The FCC makes no representations or warranties about the use of this spectrum for particular services. Applicants should be aware that an FCC auction represents an opportunity to become an FCC licensee in the 700 MHz Band subject to certain conditions and regulations. An FCC auction does not constitute an endorsement by the FCC of any particular service, technology, or product, nor does an FCC license constitute a guarantee of business success. Applicants should perform their individual due diligence before proceeding as they would with any new business venture.

40. Potential bidders are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research prior to the beginning of

bidding in Auction 73 in order to determine the existence of any pending legislative, administrative or judicial proceedings that might affect their decision regarding participation in the auction, including any subsequent auction (if necessary). Participants in Auctions 73 and 76 are strongly encouraged to continue such research throughout the auction. In addition, potential bidders should perform technical analyses sufficient to assure themselves that, should they prevail in competitive bidding for a specific license, they will be able to build and operate facilities that will fully comply with the Commission's technical and legal requirements as well as other applicable Federal, state, and local laws.

41. Applicants should also be aware that certain pending and future proceedings, including rulemaking proceedings or petitions for rulemaking, applications (including those for modification), requests for special temporary authority, waiver requests, petitions to deny, petitions for reconsideration, informal oppositions, and applications for review, before the Commission may relate to particular applicants or incumbent licensees or the licenses available in Auctions 73 and 76. For example, bidders should note that petitions have been filed for reconsideration of certain decisions made in the
700 MHz First Report and Order
and the
700 MHz Second Report and Order
. In addition, applicants should be aware that the Commission has sought comment on a range of proposals concerning consumer education about the DTV transition, including the possible imposition of reporting requirements on winning bidders for 700 MHz band licenses. Of course, pending and future judicial proceedings may relate to particular applicants or incumbent licensees, or the licenses available in Auctions 73 and 76. Prospective bidders are responsible for assessing the likelihood of the various possible outcomes, and considering their potential impact on spectrum licenses available in Auctions 73 and 76.

42. Applicants should perform due diligence to identify and consider all proceedings that may affect the spectrum licenses being auctioned and that could have an impact on the availability of spectrum for Auction 73. In addition, although the Commission may continue to act on various pending applications, informal objections, petitions, and other requests for Commission relief, some of these matters may not be resolved by the beginning of bidding in the auction.

43. Applicants are solely responsible for identifying associated risks and for investigating and evaluating the degree to which such matters may affect their ability to bid on, otherwise acquire, or make use of licenses being offered.

44. Applicants may use the licensing database for the Media Bureau on the Internet in order to determine which frequencies are already licensed to incumbent licensees. Licensing records for the Media Bureau are contained in the Media Bureau's Consolidated Data Base System (CDBS) and may be researched on the Internet at
http://www.fcc.gov/mb/cdbs.html
. Potential bidders should direct questions regarding the search capabilities of CDBS to the Media Bureau help line at (202) 418-2662, or via e-mail at
cdbshelp@fcc.gov
.

45. The Commission makes no representations or guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of information in its databases or any third party databases, including, for example, court docketing systems. To the extent the Commission's databases may not include all information deemed necessary or desirable by an applicant, applicants may obtain or verify such information from independent sources or assume the risk of any incompleteness or inaccuracy in said databases. Furthermore, the Commission makes no representations or guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of information that has been provided by incumbent licensees and incorporated into its databases.

46. Potential applicants are strongly encouraged to physically inspect any prospective sites located in, or near, the geographic area for which they plan to bid, and also to familiarize themselves with the environmental review obligations.

v. Use of Integrated Spectrum Auction System

47. The Commission will make available a browser-based bidding system to allow bidders to participate in Auction 73 over the Internet using the Commission's Integrated Spectrum Auction System (ISAS or FCC Auction System). The Commission makes no warranty 21 whatsoever with respect to the FCC Auction System. In no event shall the Commission, or any of its officers, employees or agents, be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, but not limited to, loss of business profits, business interruption, loss of business information, or any other loss) arising out of or relating to the existence, furnishing, functioning or use of the FCC Auction System that is accessible to qualified bidders in connection with Auctions 73 and 76. Moreover, no obligation or liability will arise out of the Commission's technical, programming or other advice or service provided in connection with the FCC Auction System.

vi. Fraud Alert

48. As is the case with many business investment opportunities, some unscrupulous entrepreneurs may attempt to use Auction 73 to deceive and defraud unsuspecting investors. Information about deceptive telemarketing investment schemes is available from the Commission as well as the FTC and SEC. Complaints about specific deceptive telemarketing investment schemes should be directed to the FTC, the SEC, or the National Fraud Information Center at (800) 876-7060.

vii. Environmental Review Requirements

49. Licensees must comply with the Commission's rules regarding implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act and other federal environmental statutes. The construction of a wireless antenna facility is a federal action and the licensee must comply with the Commission's environmental rules for each such facility. The Commission's environmental rules require, among other things, that the licensee consult with expert agencies having environmental responsibilities, including the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the State Historic Preservation Office, the Army Corps of Engineers and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (through the local authority with jurisdiction over floodplains). In assessing the effect of facilities construction on historic properties, the licensee must follow the provisions of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement Regarding the Section 106 National Historic Preservation Act Review Process. The licensee must prepare environmental assessments for facilities that may have a significant impact in or on wilderness areas, wildlife preserves, threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats, historical or archaeological sites, Indian religious sites, floodplains, and surface features. The licensee also must prepare environmental assessments for facilities that include high intensity white lights in residential neighborhoods or excessive radio frequency emission.

C. Auction Specifics

i. Auction 73 Start Date

50. Bidding in Auction 73 will begin on Thursday, January 24, 2008.

51. This change of the previously-announced start date for Auction 73 will provide interested parties with additional time after this announcement of competitive bidding procedures to develop business plans, assess market conditions, and evaluate the availability of equipment for new 700 MHz Band services.

52. Some commenters had sought a postponement of the previously-announced start date until January 25 or 28, 2008. Pursuant to the Congressional mandate, the Commission must conduct the auction of licenses for recovered analog spectrum in the 700 MHz Band by commencing the bidding not later than January 28, 2008. Starting the auction on the statutory deadline for commencing the auction, or one business day prior to the deadline would provide insufficient time to address unexpected matters that might arise just prior to the start of bidding.

53. The initial schedule for bidding will be announced by public notice at least one week before the start of the auction. Moreover, unless otherwise announced, bidding on all licenses and packages will be conducted on each business day until bidding has stopped on all licenses and packages.

ii. Auction Title

54. The auction in which the 700 MHz Band licenses will initially be offered is designated as Auction 73—700 MHz Band. In the event that any licenses, including alternative licenses, are offered in contingent subsequent bidding, that will be designated as Auction 76.

iii. Bidding Methodology

55. The bidding methodology for Auction 73 will be simultaneous multiple round (SMR) bidding for the A, B, D, and E Block licenses and an auction design with hierarchical package bidding (HPB) for the C Block licenses. The Commission will conduct Auctions 73 and 76 over the Internet using the FCC Auction System, and telephonic bidding will be available as well. Qualified bidders are permitted to bid electronically via the Internet or by telephone. All telephone calls are recorded.

iv. Pre-Auction Dates and Deadlines

56. The following dates and deadlines apply:

Auction Seminar
November 20, 2007.

Auction 73 and 76 Short-Form Application (FCC Form 175) Filing Window Opens
November 19, 2007; 12 noon ET.

Auction 73 and 76 Short-Form Application (FCC Form 175) Filing Window Deadline
December 3, 2007; prior to 6 p.m. ET.

Auction 73 Upfront Payments (via wire transfer)
December 28, 2007; 6 p.m. ET.

Mock Auction
January 18, 2008.

Auction 73 Begins
January 24, 2008.

57. If contingent subsequent bidding is necessary, the Bureau intends to announce the start date for Auction 76 and the deadline for additional upfront payments within five business days after the end of bidding in Auction 73. The Bureau expects that Auction 76 would begin within three weeks of that announcement.

v. Requirements for Participation in Auction 73 and 76

58. Those wishing to participate in Auction 73 and 76 (should any subsequent auction become necessary), must: (1) For Auction 73, submit a short-form application (FCC Form 175) electronically prior to 6 p.m. ET, December 3, 2007, following the electronic filing procedures set forth in Attachment D to the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice;
(2) for Auction 76, submit short-form applications (FCC Form 175) electronically prior to 6 p.m. ET, December 3, 2007, for each auction following the electronic filing procedures set forth in Attachments D and E to the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice.
Bidding in Auction 76 is open only to applicants that qualify to participate in Auction 73, and that comply with all of the requirements for participating in Auction 76, including submitting a separate short-form application; (3) for Auction 73, submit a sufficient upfront payment and an FCC Remittance Advice Form (FCC Form 159) by 6 p.m. ET, December 28, 2007, following the procedures and instructions set forth in Attachment F to the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice;
(4) for Auction 76 (if necessary), submit a sufficient upfront payment and an FCC Remittance Advice Form (FCC Form 159) by the deadline to be announced following the end of bidding in Auction 73; and (5) comply with all provisions outlined in this Public Notice and applicable Commission rules.

D. Other Issues Raised by Commenters

59. Two commenters raised issues that are unrelated to those raised in the
700 MHz Auction Public Notice.
One commenter proposes that the Commission should require that all licenses offered in Auction 73 be made available to public safety personnel for priority use during critical emergencies. The commenter also suggests that such a requirement be considered in the event of a contingent auction, if any. Another commenter urges the Commission to require applicants to disclose on their short-form applications whether winning the licenses they have selected would cause their spectrum holdings to exceed 70 MHz of spectrum in the markets of the selected licenses. In the event that any applicants indicate that their spectrum holdings would exceed this amount, the commenter proposed that their short-form applications should be dismissed before the commencement of Auction 73. The commenter also requests that the Commission investigate alleged violations of the Commission's
ex parte
rules by a wireless company concerning policy on the open platform provisions for C Block licenses, and proposes excluding that company from Auction 73 as a possible sanction for violating the Commission's rules.

60. These issues are outside the scope of this non-rulemaking proceeding, which is confined to establishing competitive bidding procedures for Auction 73. The Bureau notes that some of these issues have been presented to the Commission in petitions for reconsideration of the
700 MHz Second Report and Order
and will be addressed in that proceeding.

II. Short-Form Application (FCC Form 175) Requirements

61. Entities seeking licenses available in Auction 73 must file a short-form application electronically via the FCC Auction System prior to 6 p.m. ET on December 3, 2007, following the procedures prescribed in Attachment D to the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice.
Applicants filing a short-form application are subject to the Commission's anti-collusion rules beginning on the deadline for filing. For Auctions 73 and 76, applicants filing a short-form application for Auction 73 will remain subject to the Commission's anti-collusion rules through the

completion of Auction 76, if conducted. If an applicant claims eligibility for a bidding credit, the information provided in its FCC Form 175 will be used in determining whether the applicant is eligible for the claimed bidding credit. Applicants bear full responsibility for submitting accurate, complete and timely short-form applications. All applicants must certify on their short-form applications under penalty of perjury that they are legally, technically, financially and otherwise qualified to hold a license. Applicants should read the instructions set forth in Attachment D to the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice
carefully and should consult 26 the Commission's rules to ensure that all the information that is required under the Commission's rules is included with their short-form applications.

62. Entities seeking licenses that may be offered in Auction 76, if Auction 76 is conducted, must file electronically via the FCC Auction System prior to 6 p.m. ET on December 3, 2007 both a short-form application for Auction 73, following the procedures prescribed in Attachment D to the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice
, and an abbreviated short-form application for Auction 76, following the procedures prescribed in Attachment E to the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice
. Applicants filing short-form applications for both Auctions 73 and 76 are subject to the Commission's anti-collusion rules beginning on the deadline for filing both applications.

63. To streamline the application process, other than license selection requirements, all relevant information for the application to participate in Auction 76 must be submitted as part of the application to participate in Auction 73. The Auction 76 abbreviated application will request—and will accept—only information that the FCC Auction System requires in order to enable applicants to submit license selections for Auction 76. For example, applicants seeking to submit information regarding bidding agreements with respect to licenses offered in Auction 76 will not be able to access the bidding agreement screens that are usually part of the short-form application in the Auction 76 abbreviated application. Instead, such applicants must submit information regarding those agreements as part of their Auction 73 short-form application.

64. To comply with FCC Auction System requirements, however, applicants will be required to repeat some information submitted in their Auction 73 application, e.g., their FCC Registration Number (FRN), their name and address, certification of the form's contents, etc. As noted in the procedures for filing the abbreviated short-form application for Auction 76, applicants must provide the same information submitted in their application for Auction 73 as they provide in their Auction 76 application. Most importantly, if an entity wishes to submit a short-form application for Auction 76, it must do so using the same FRN that it uses for its short-form application for Auction 73. In addition, the same person must certify both applications, as the certification applies to information submitted in both applications.

65. An entity may not submit more than one short-form application for Auction 73. Similarly, an entity may not submit more than one short-form application for Auction 76. If a party submits multiple short-form applications for either Auction 73 or Auction 76, only one application for each will be accepted for filing.

66. Applicants also should note that submission of a short-form application (and any amendments thereto) constitutes a representation by the certifying official that he or she is an authorized representative of the applicant, that he or she has read the form's instructions and certifications, and that the contents of the application, its certifications, and any attachments are true and correct. Applicants are not permitted to make major modifications to their applications; such impermissible changes include a change of the certifying official to the application. Submission of a false certification to the Commission may result in penalties, including monetary forfeitures, license forfeitures, ineligibility to participate in future auctions, and/or criminal prosecution.

A. Preferences for Small Businesses and Others

i. Size Standards for Bidding Credits

67. A bidding credit represents the amount by which a bidder's winning bid will be discounted. For Auction 73 and Auction 76, bidding credits will be available to small businesses and very small businesses, and consortia thereof, as follows: (1) A bidder with attributed average annual gross revenues that exceed $15 million and do not exceed $40 million for the preceding three years (small business) will receive a 15 percent discount on its winning bid; and (2) a bidder with attributed average annual gross revenues that do not exceed $15 million for the preceding three years (very small business) will receive a 25 percent discount on its winning bid.

68. Bidding credits are not cumulative; a qualifying applicant receives either the 15 percent or 25 percent bidding credit on its winning bid, but not both.

69. Every applicant that claims eligibility for a bidding credit as either a small business or a very small business, or a consortium of small businesses or very small businesses, will be required to provide information regarding revenues attributable to the applicant, its affiliates, its controlling interests, and the affiliates of its controlling interests on its FCC Form 175 short-form application for Auction 73 to establish that it satisfies the applicable eligibility requirement. An applicant's disclosure of this information in the short-form application for Auction 73 will become part of the applicant's Auction 76 application, in the event the Commission conducts Auction 76. Accordingly, applicants are not required—and will not be able to—submit this information in their abbreviated Auction 76 application. Applicants claiming eligibility as a designated entity in Auction 73 and Auction 76 should review carefully the
CSEA/Part 1 Report and Order
, 71 FR 6992, February 10, 2006, the
Designated Entity Second Report and Order
, 71 FR 26245, May 5, 2006, and the
Order on Reconsideration of the Designated Entity Second Report and Order
, 71 FR 34272, June 14, 2006. In that connection, the Commission adopted rules governing eligibility for designated entity benefits in the
Designated Entity Second Report and Order
. The Commission's rules regarding applicants seeking eligibility for designated entity benefits require the disclosure of: (1) All parties with which the applicant has entered into arrangements for the lease or resale (including wholesale agreements) of any of the capacity of any of the applicant's spectrum; and (2) the gross revenues, separately and in the aggregate, of entities with which the applicant has an attributable material relationship, as defined in § 1.2110(b)(3)(iv)(B).

70. The Commission has adopted a narrow exemption from the attribution rule for the officers and directors of a rural telephone cooperative pursuant to which the gross revenues of the affiliates of the cooperative's officers and directors are not attributed to the applicant. An applicant (or controlling interest) seeking to claim this exemption must include in its short-form application a certification that it is validly organized under the most

closely applicable organizing statute for a cooperative, and that such organization is reflected in its articles of incorporation, bylaws, and/or other relevant organic documents. Applicants seeking to claim this exemption must meet all of the conditions specified in § 1.2110(b)(3)(iii) of the Commission's rules. Additional guidance on completing the FCC Form 175 to claim this exemption may be found in Attachment D to the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice
.

ii. Tribal Lands Bidding Credit

71. To encourage the growth of wireless services in federally recognized tribal lands, the Commission has implemented a tribal lands bidding credit. Applicants do not provide information regarding tribal lands bidding credits on their FCC Form 175 short-form applications. Instead, winning bidders may apply for the tribal lands bidding credit after the auction when they file their FCC Form 601 long-form applications.

iii. Installment Payments

72. Installment payment plans will not be available in Auction 73 or in Auction 76.

B. License Selection

73. An applicant must select the initially offered licenses on which it wants to bid individually or as part of a pre-defined package in Auction 73 from the Eligible Licenses list on its short-form application for Auction 73. An applicant interested in bidding on licenses in the contingent subsequent auction must select those licenses from the Eligible Licenses list on its short-form application for Auction 76. Applicants will be able to bid on pre-defined packages of initially offered C Block licenses and alternative C2 Block licenses, if offered in subsequent bidding, pursuant to the package bidding procedures, only if they have selected all the individual licenses that comprise the relevant package on their respective short-form applications.

74. To assist applicants in identifying licenses of interest that will be available in Auctions 73 and 76, FCC Form 175 will include a filtering mechanism that allows an applicant to filter the Eligible Licenses list. The applicant will make selections for one or more of the filter criteria and the system will produce a list of licenses satisfying the specified criteria. The applicant may select all the licenses in the customized list or select individual licenses from the list. Applicants also will be able to select licenses from one customized list and then create additional customized lists to select additional licenses.

75. Applicants will not be able to change their license selections for either Auction 73 or Auction 76 after the short-form application filing deadline. Applicants interested in participating in Auctions 73 and 76 must have selected license(s) available in the respective auction by the short-form application deadline. Applicants must confirm their license selections before the deadline for submitting FCC Form 175. The FCC Auction System will not accept bids from an applicant on individual licenses that the applicant has not selected on its FCC Form 175. In addition, the FCC Auction System will not accept bids from an applicant on a pre-defined hierarchical package unless the applicant selected on its FCC Form 175 all the individual licenses that comprise the package.

C. Disclosure of Bidding Arrangements

76. Applicants will be required to identify in their short-form application for Auction 73 all parties with whom they have entered into any agreements, arrangements, or understandings of any kind relating to the licenses being auctioned in Auctions 73 and 76, including any agreements relating to post-auction market structure. The agreements identified in the short-form application for Auction 73 will become part of the applicant's Auction 76 application, in the event the 31 Commission conducts Auction 76. Accordingly, applicants are not required—and will not be able to—disclose bidding agreements in their abbreviated Auction 76 application.

77. Applicants also will be required to certify under penalty of perjury in their short-form applications that they have not entered and will not enter into any explicit or implicit agreements, arrangements or understandings of any kind with any parties, other than those identified in the application to participate in Auction 73, regarding the amount of their bids, bidding strategies, or the particular licenses on which they will or will not bid. If an applicant has had discussions, but has not reached an agreement by the short-form application filing deadline, it would not include the names of parties to the discussions on its application and may not continue such discussions with any applicants after the deadline.

78. After the filing of short-form applications, the Commission's rules do not prohibit a party holding a non-controlling, attributable interest in one applicant from acquiring an ownership interest in or entering into a joint bidding arrangement with other applicants, provided that: (1) The attributable interest holder certifies that it has not and will not communicate with any party concerning the bids or bidding strategies of more than one of the applicants in which it holds an attributable interest, or with which it has entered into a joint bidding arrangement; and (2) the arrangements do not result in a change in control of any of the applicants. While the anti-collusion rules do not prohibit non-auction-related business negotiations among auction applicants, applicants are reminded that certain discussions or exchanges could touch upon impermissible subject matters because they may convey pricing information and bidding strategies. Compliance with the disclosure requirements of the Commission's anti-collusion rule will not insulate a party from enforcement of the antitrust laws.

D. Ownership Disclosure Requirements

79. All applicants must comply with the uniform part 1 ownership disclosure standards and provide information required by § 1.2105 and 1.2112 of the Commission's rules. Specifically, in completing the short-form application for Auction 73, applicants will be required to fully disclose information on the real party or parties-in-interest and ownership structure of the applicant. The ownership disclosure standards for the short-form application are prescribed in § 1.2105 and 1.2112 of the Commission's rules. Each applicant is responsible for information submitted in its short-form application being complete and accurate. An applicant's disclosure of ownership information in the short-form application for Auction 73 will become part of the applicant's Auction 76 application, in the event the Commission conducts Auction 76. Accordingly, applicants are not required—and will not be able to—submit ownership disclosure information in their abbreviated Auction 76 application.

80. An applicant's most current ownership information on file with the Commission, if in an electronic format compatible with the short-form application (FCC Form 175) (such as information submitted in an online FCC Form 602 or in an FCC Form 175 filed for a previous auction using ISAS) will automatically be entered into the applicant's short-form application. An applicant is responsible for ensuring that the information submitted in its short-form application for Auction 73 is complete and accurate. Accordingly, applicants should carefully review any information automatically entered to confirm that it is complete and accurate

as of the deadline for filing the short-form application. Applicants can update any information that was entered automatically and needs to be changed directly in the short-form application.

E. Bidding Credit Revenue Disclosures

81. To determine which applicants qualify for bidding credits as small businesses or very small businesses, the Commission considers the gross revenues of the applicant, its affiliates, its controlling interests, and the affiliates of its controlling interests. Therefore, entities applying to bid as small businesses or very small businesses (or consortia of small businesses or very small businesses) will be required to disclose on their short-form applications for Auction 73 the gross revenues of the preceding three years for each of the following: (1) The applicant; (2) its 33 affiliates; (3) its controlling interests; and (4) the affiliates of its controlling interests. Certification that the average annual gross revenues of such entities and individuals for the preceding three years do not exceed the applicable limit is not sufficient. Applicants must also disclose the gross revenues of the entities with which they have attributable material relationships, as defined by the Commission's rules. Additionally, if an applicant is applying as a consortium of small businesses or very small businesses, this information must be provided for each consortium member. An applicant's disclosure of bidding credit revenue information in the short-form application for Auction 73 will become part of the applicant's Auction 76 application, in the event the Commission conducts Auction 76. Accordingly, applicants are not required and will not be able to submit bidding credit revenue information in their abbreviated Auction 76 application.

82. Controlling interests of an applicant include individuals and entities with either
de facto
or
de jure
control of the applicant. Typically, ownership of at least 50.1 percent of an entity's voting stock evidences
de jure
control.
De facto
control is determined on a case-by-case basis. The following are some common indicia of
de facto
control: (1) The entity constitutes or appoints more than 50 percent of the board of directors or management committee; (2) the entity has authority to appoint, promote, demote, and fire senior executives that control the day-to-day activities of the licensee; and (3) the entity plays an integral role in management decisions.

83. Officers and directors of an applicant are also considered to have controlling interest in the applicant. The Commission does not impose specific equity requirements on controlling interest holders. Once the principals or entities with a controlling interest are determined, only the revenues of those principals or entities; the affiliates of those principals or entities; the applicant and its affiliates; and any parties having an attributable material relationship with the applicant will be counted in determining small business eligibility.

84. In the
Designated Entity Second Report and Order
, the Commission adopted material relationship rules. The Commission now requires the consideration of certain leasing and resale (including wholesale) relationships—material relationships—in determining designated entity eligibility. Material relationships fall into two categories: impermissible and attributable. An applicant or licensee has an impermissible material relationship when it has agreements with one or more other entities for the lease or resale (including under a wholesale agreement) of, on a cumulative basis, more than 50 percent of the spectrum capacity of any of its licenses. If an applicant or a licensee has an impermissible material relationship, it is, as a result, (1) ineligible for the award of designated entity benefits, and (2) subject to unjust enrichment on a license-bylicense basis.

85. An applicant or licensee has an attributable material relationship when it has one or more agreements with any individual entity for the lease or resale (including under a wholesale agreement) of, on a cumulative basis, more than 25 percent of the spectrum capacity of any individual license held by the applicant or licensee. The attributable material relationship will cause the gross revenues and, if applicable, total assets of that entity and its attributable interest holders to be attributed to the applicant or licensee for the purposes of determining the applicant's or licensee's (1) eligibility for designated entity benefits and (2) liability for unjust enrichment on a license-by-license basis.

86. The Commission grandfathered material relationships in existence before the release of the
Designated Entity Second Report and Order
, meaning that those preexisting relationships would not alone cause the Commission to examine a designated entity's ongoing eligibility for benefits or its liability for unjust enrichment. The Commission did not, however, grandfather preexisting material relationships for determinations of an applicant's or licensee's designated entity eligibility for future auctions or in the context of future assignments, transfers of control, spectrum leases, or other reportable eligibility events. Rather, the occurrence of any of those 35 eligibility events after the release date of the
Designated Entity Second Report and Order
triggers a reexamination of the applicant's or licensee's designated entity eligibility, taking into account all existing material relationships, including those previously grandfathered.

87. In recent years the Commission has also made other modifications to its rules governing the attribution of gross revenues for purposes of determining small business eligibility. These changes include exempting the gross revenues of the affiliates of a rural telephone cooperative's officers and directors from attribution to the applicant if certain specified conditions are met. The Commission has also clarified that, in calculating an applicant's gross revenues under the controlling interest standard, it will not attribute the personal net worth, including personal income, of its officers and directors to the applicant.

88. A consortium of small businesses or very small businesses is a conglomerate organization composed of two or more entities, each of which individually satisfies the definition of a small business or very small business as those terms are defined in the service-specific rules. Thus, each member of a consortium of small or very small businesses that applies to participate in Auction 73 must individually meet the definition of small business or very small business adopted by the Commission for the 700 MHz Band. Each consortium member must disclose its gross revenues along with those of its affiliates, its controlling interests, the affiliates of its controlling interests, and any entities having an attributable material relationship with the member. Although the gross revenues of the consortium members will not be aggregated for purposes of determining the consortium's eligibility as a small business or very small business, this information must be provided to ensure that each individual consortium member qualifies for any bidding credit awarded to the consortium.

F. Provisions Regarding Former and Current Defaulters

89. Each applicant must state under penalty of perjury on its short-form application whether or not the applicant, its affiliates, its controlling interests, and the affiliates of its 36 controlling interests, as defined by § 1.2110, have ever been in default on any Commission licenses or have ever

been delinquent on any non-tax debt owed to any Federal agency. In addition, each applicant must certify under penalty of perjury on its short-form application that, as of the short-form filing deadline, the applicant, its affiliates, its controlling interests, and the affiliates of its controlling interests, as defined by § 1.2110, are not in default on any payment for Commission licenses (including down payments) and that they are not delinquent on any non-tax debt owed to any Federal agency. Prospective applicants are reminded that submission of a false certification to the Commission is a serious matter that may result in severe penalties, including monetary forfeitures, license revocations, exclusion from participation in future auctions, and/or criminal prosecution. These statements and certifications are prerequisites to submitting an application in the FCC Auction System. Accordingly, applicants seeking licenses that may be offered in Auction 76 will be required to make these statements and certifications in both their short-form application for Auction 73 and their abbreviated Auction 76 application.

90. Former defaulters—i.e., applicants, including any of their affiliates, any of their controlling interests, or any of the affiliates of their controlling interests, that in the past have defaulted on any Commission licenses or been delinquent on any non-tax debt owed to any Federal agency, but that have since remedied all such defaults and cured all of their outstanding non-tax delinquencies—are eligible to bid in Auctions 73 and 76, provided that they are otherwise qualified. Former defaulters are required to pay upfront payments that are fifty percent more than the normal upfront payment amounts.

91. Current defaulters—i.e., applicants, including any of their affiliates, any of their controlling interests, or any of the affiliates of their controlling interests, that are in default on any payment for any Commission licenses (including down payments) or are delinquent on any non-tax debt owed to any Federal agency as of the filing deadline for short-form applications—are not eligible to bid in either Auction 73 or Auction 76.

92. Applicants are encouraged to review the Bureau's previous guidance on default and delinquency disclosure requirements in the context of the short-form application process. For example, it has been determined that to the extent that Commission rules permit late payment of regulatory or application fees accompanied by late fees, such debts will become delinquent for purposes of § 1.2105(a) and 1.2106(a) only after the expiration of a final payment deadline. Therefore, with respect to regulatory or application fees, the provisions of § 1.2105(a) and 1.2106(a) regarding default and delinquency in connection with competitive bidding are limited to circumstances in which the relevant party has not complied with a final Commission payment deadline.

93. The Commission considers outstanding debts owed to the United States Government, in any amount, to be a serious matter. The Commission adopted rules, including a provision referred to as the red light rule, that implement the Commission's obligations under the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, which governs the collection of claims owed to the United States. Under the red light rule, the Commission will not process applications and other requests for benefits filed by parties that have outstanding debts owed to the Commission. In the same rulemaking order, the Commission explicitly declared, however, that the Commission's competitive bidding rules are not affected by the red light rule. As a consequence, the Commission's adoption of the red light rule does not alter the applicability of any of the Commission's competitive bidding rules, including the provisions and certifications of § 1.2105 and 1.2106, with regard to current and former defaults or delinquencies. Applicants are reminded, however, that the Commission's Red Light Display System, which provides information regarding debts owed to the Commission, may not be determinative of an auction applicant's ability to comply with the default and delinquency disclosure requirements of § 1.2105. Thus, while the red light rule ultimately may prevent the processing of long-form 38 applications by auction winners, an auction applicant's red light status is not necessarily determinative of its eligibility to participate in an auction or of its upfront payment obligation.

94. Prospective applicants should note that any long-form applications filed after the close of competitive bidding will be reviewed for compliance with the Commission's red light rule, and such review may result in the dismissal of a winning bidder's long-form application.

G. Other Information

95. Applicants owned by members of minority groups and/or women, as defined in § 1.2110(c)(3), may identify themselves in filling out their short-form applications regarding this status. This applicant status information is collected for statistical purposes only and assists the Commission in monitoring the participation of designated entities in its auctions.

H. Minor Modifications to Short-Form Applications (FCC Form 175)

96. Applicants are not permitted to make major modifications to their short-form applications (e.g., change their license selections, change control of the applicant, change the certifying official, or change their size to claim eligibility for a higher bidding credit) after the short-form application deadline. Thus, any change in control of an applicant, resulting from a merger for example, will be considered a major modification to the applicant's FCC Form 175, which will consequently be dismissed.

97. Applicants are, however, permitted to make only minor changes to their FCC Form 175 after the short-form application deadline. Permissible minor changes include, for example, deletion and addition of authorized bidders (to a maximum of three) and revision of addresses and telephone numbers of the applicants and their contact persons.

98. If an applicant wishes to make permissible minor changes to its short-form application, such changes should be made electronically to its Auction 73 short-form application using the FCC Auction System. Applicants should not make changes to short-form applications 39 associated with Auction 76. Applicants are reminded to click on the SUBMIT button in the FCC Auction System for the changes to be submitted and considered by the Commission. After the revised application has been submitted, a confirmation page will be displayed that states the submission time and date, along with a unique file number.

99. In addition, during those periods outside of the initial and resubmission filing windows (i.e., when an applicant cannot electronically update its FCC Form 175), an applicant should submit a letter briefly summarizing the changes and subsequently update its short-form applications in ISAS as soon as possible. After the filing window has closed, the auction system will not permit applicants to make certain changes, such as legal classification and bidding credit. Any letter describing changes to an applicant's short-form application should be submitted by electronic mail to the following address:
auction73@fcc.gov
. The electronic mail summarizing the changes must include a subject or caption referring to Auction 73 and the name of the applicant (e.g.,

RE: Changes to Auction 73 Short-Form Application of ABC Corp.), and should not reference Auction 76.

100. Applicants must not submit application-specific material through the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS).

I. Maintaining Current Information in Short-Form Applications (FCC Form 175)

101. Section 1.65 of the Commission's rules requires an applicant to maintain the accuracy and completeness of information furnished in its pending application and to notify the Commission within 30 days of any substantial change that may be of decisional significance to that application. Changes that cause a loss of or reduction in eligibility for a bidding credit must be reported immediately. If an amendment reporting substantial changes is a major amendment as defined by § 1.2105, the major amendment will not be accepted and may result in the dismissal of the short-form application.

102. After the short-form filing deadline, applicants may make only minor changes to their short-form applications, such as deleting or adding authorized bidders (to a maximum of three). Applicants must click on the SUBMIT button in the FCC Auction System for the changes to be submitted and considered by the Commission. In addition, applicants must submit a letter, briefly summarizing the changes, by electronic mail at the following address:
auction73@fcc.gov
. The electronic mail summarizing the changes must include a subject or caption referring to Auction 73 and the name of the applicant. Applicants must not submit application-specific material through ECFS.

III. Pre-Auction Procedures

A. Auction Seminar—November 20, 2007

103. On Tuesday November 20, 2007, the FCC will sponsor a free seminar for parties interested in participating in Auctions 73 and 76 at the FCC headquarters, located at 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The seminar will provide attendees with information about pre-auction procedures, completing FCC Form 175, auction conduct, the FCC Auction System, auction rules, and the 700 MHz Band service rules. The seminar will also provide an opportunity for prospective bidders to ask questions of FCC staff concerning the auction, auction procedures, filing requirements and other matters related to Auctions 73 and 76.

104. To register, please provide the information listed on the Auctions 73 and 76 Public Notice released October 19, 2007 (DA 07-4236), by fax (717) 338-2850, e-mail
Auchelp@fcc.gov
or telephone (717) 338-2868 to the FCC by Friday, November 16, 2007. For individuals who are unable to attend, an Audio/Video webcast of this seminar will be available from the FCC's Auction 73 Web page at
http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/73/
.

B. Short-Form Applications (FCC Form 175)—Due Prior to 6 p.m. ET on December 3, 2007

105. In order to be eligible to bid in Auction 73 or Auction 76, applicants must first follow the procedures set forth in Attachments D and E to the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice
to submit an FCC Form 175 application electronically via the FCC Auction System. The application must be received at the Commission prior to 6 p.m. ET on December 3, 2007. Late applications will not be accepted. There is no application fee required when filing an FCC Form 175, but an applicant must submit an upfront payment to be eligible to bid.

106. Applications may generally be filed at any time beginning at noon ET on November 19, 2007, and the filing window will close prior to 6 p.m. ET on December 3, 2007. Applicants are strongly encouraged to file early and are responsible for allowing adequate time for filing their applications. Applicants may update or amend their applications multiple times until the filing deadline on December 3, 2007.

107. Applicants must always click on the SUBMIT button on the Certify & Submit screen of the electronic form to successfully submit or modify their FCC Form 175. Any form that is not submitted will not be reviewed by the FCC. Additional information about accessing, completing, and viewing the FCC Form 175 is included in Attachments D and E of the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice
. FCC Auctions Technical Support is available at (877) 480-3200, or (202) 414-1255 (text telephone (TTY)); hours of service are Monday through Friday, from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. ET.

C. Application Processing and Minor Corrections

108. After the deadline for filing short-form applications, the Commission will process all timely submitted applications to determine which are acceptable for filing, and subsequently will issue a public notice identifying: (1) Those applications accepted for filing; (2) those applications rejected; and (3) those applications which have minor defects that may be corrected, and the deadline for resubmitting corrected applications.

109. After the December 3, 2007, short-form filing deadline, applicants may make only minor corrections to their applications. Applicants will not be permitted to make major modifications to their applications (e.g., change their license selections, change control of the applicant, change certifying official, or change their size to claim eligibility for a higher bidding credit). Accordingly, applicants interested in participating in any potential contingent subsequent bidding must have selected license(s) available in the initial bidding as well as licenses that may be available in contingent subsequent bidding, including alternative licenses, by the deadline for submitting their application to participate in Auction 73. FCC personnel will communicate regarding a short-form application only with an applicant's contact person or certifying official, as designated on the applicant's FCC Form 175, unless the applicant's certifying official or contact person notifies the Commission in writing that applicant's counsel or other representative is authorized to speak on its behalf.

D. Upfront Payments—Due December 28, 2007

110. In order to be eligible to bid in Auction 73 and any contingent subsequent auction, applicants must submit an upfront payment accompanied by an FCC Remittance Advice Form (FCC Form 159). Only applicants that become qualified bidders in Auction 73, by, among other things, making upfront payments to be eligible to bid in Auction 73, will be eligible to participate in any contingent subsequent auction. However, qualified bidders in Auction 73 will be permitted to make additional upfront payments with respect to licenses being offered in any contingent subsequent auction at a later date. After completing the FCC Form 175, filers will have access to an electronic version of the FCC Form 159 that can be printed and sent by facsimile to Mellon Bank in Pittsburgh, PA. All upfront payments for Auction 73 must be received in the proper account at Mellon Bank by 6 p.m. ET on December 28, 2007.

i. Making Upfront Payments by Wire Transfer

111. Wire transfer payments for Auction 73 must be received by 6 p.m.

ET on December 28, 2007. No other payment method is acceptable. To avoid untimely payments, applicants should discuss arrangements (including bank closing schedules) with their banker several days before they plan to make the wire transfer, and allow sufficient time for the transfer to be initiated and completed before the deadline. The BNF and Lockbox number are specific to the upfront payments for Auction 73. Do not use BNF or Lockbox numbers from previous auctions. Wire transfer information for Auction 76 will be made available in a future public notice.

112. At least one hour before placing the order for the wire transfer (but on the same business day), applicants must send by facsimile a completed FCC Form 159 (Revised 2/03) to Mellon Bank at (412) 209-6045. On the cover sheet of the facsimile, write Wire Transfer—Auction Payment for Auction 73. In order to meet the Commission's upfront payment deadline, an applicant's payment must be credited to the Commission's account before the deadline. Applicants are responsible for obtaining confirmation from their financial institution that Mellon Bank has timely received their upfront payment and deposited it in the proper account.

113. Please note that: (1) All payments must be made in U.S. dollars; (2) all payments must be made by wire transfer; (3) upfront payments for Auction 73 go to a lockbox number different from the lockboxes used in previous FCC auctions, and different from the lockbox number to be used for post-auction payments; and (4) failure to deliver the upfront payment as instructed by the December 28, 2007, deadline will result in dismissal of the application and disqualification from participation in the auction as well as ineligibility for participation in any contingent subsequent bidding for 700 MHz Band licenses.

ii. FCC Form 159

114. A completed FCC Remittance Advice Form (FCC Form 159, Revised 2/03) must be sent by facsimile to Mellon Bank to accompany each upfront payment. Proper completion of FCC Form 159 (Revised 2/03) is critical to ensuring correct crediting of upfront payments. Detailed instructions for completion of FCC Form 159 are included in Attachment F to the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice
. An electronic pre-filled version of the FCC Form 159 is available after submitting the FCC Form 175. Payors using a pre-filled FCC Form 159 are responsible for ensuring that all of the information on the form, including payment amounts, is accurate. The FCC Form 159 can be completed electronically, but must be filed with Mellon Bank via facsimile.

iii. Upfront Payments and Bidding Eligibility

115. In the
700 MHz Auction Public Notice
, the Bureau proposed that the amount of the upfront payment would determine a bidder's initial bidding eligibility, the maximum number of bidding units on which a bidder may place bids. In addition, consistent with the Commission's direction in the
700 MHz Second Report and Order
, the Bureau proposed that qualified bidders in Auction 73 would have an opportunity to submit additional upfront payments to obtain bidding eligibility for licenses in any contingent subsequent auction (Auction 76).

116. Under the Bureau's proposal, in order to bid on a particular license or package, qualified bidders must have selected the license(s) on FCC Form 175 and must have a current eligibility level that meets or exceeds the number of bidding units assigned to that license or package. For a package, the bidding units are calculated by adding together the bidding units of the individual licenses that make up the package. At a minimum, therefore, an applicant's total upfront payment must be enough to establish eligibility to bid on at least one of the licenses selected on its FCC Form 175 for Auction 73, or else the applicant will not be eligible to participate in Auction 73 or in Auction 76. An applicant does not have to make an upfront 45 payment to cover all licenses the applicant selected on its FCC Form 175, but rather to cover the maximum number of bidding units that are associated with licenses on which the bidder wishes to place bids and hold provisionally winning bids (via bids on licenses and/or packages) at any given time in Auction 73. If contingent subsequent bidding is necessary, qualified bidders for Auction 73 will be given an opportunity to supplement their upfront payments in order to increase their bidding eligibility for Auction 76.

117. In the
700 MHz Auction Public Notice
, the Bureau proposed to calculate upfront payments as follows: (1) For licenses covering CMAs in the 50 states in which the licenses offered in Auction 66 were sold, $0.05 per MHz per population (MHz-pop) for Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) licenses and $0.03/MHz-pop for Rural Service Area (RSA) licenses; (2) for licenses covering EAs in the 50 states in which the corresponding licenses in both EA blocks offered in Auction 66 were sold, the sum of $0.05/MHz-pop for counties contained within an MSA and $0.03/MHz-pop for counties contained within an RSA; (3) for licenses covering REAGs in the 50 states in which the corresponding licenses in all three REAG blocks offered in Auction 66 were sold, the sum of $0.05/MHz-pop for counties contained within an MSA and $0.03/MHz-pop for counties contained within an RSA; (4)for licenses covering geographic areas for which an Auction 66 license was unsold, $0.01/MHz-pop; (5)for licenses covering the Gulf of Mexico, $1,000 per MHz; and (6) for all remaining licenses, $0.01/MHz-pop. For all licenses, the results of the above calculations are subject to a minimum of $500 per license and are rounded using its standard rounding procedure.

118. The Bureau set forth the specific upfront payments and bidding units for each license in Attachment A of the
700 MHz Auction Public Notice
and sought comment on this proposal. The Bureau did not receive any comments in response to the proposed upfront payments, or on its proposal that the upfront payment amount would determine a bidder's initial bidding eligibility. Therefore, the Bureau adopt the upfront payments and bidding units for each 46 license in Auction 73 as proposed and set forth in Attachment A of the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice
.

119. In calculating its upfront payment amount, an applicant interested in bidding only on individual licenses should determine the maximum number of bidding units on which it may wish to be active (bid on or hold provisionally winning bids on) in any single round in Auction 73, and submit an upfront payment amount covering that number of bidding units. Applicants interested in bidding on packages should determine their upfront payment amount by calculating the sum of bidding units associated with each discrete license they wish to include in new bids (package or individual bids) or have included in provisionally winning bids in any single round. The bidding units associated with a given license, even if the license is included in more than one bid, will be counted only once per bidder per round. In order to make this calculation, an applicant should add together the upfront payments for all licenses comprising all combinations of licenses and packages of licenses on which it seeks to be active in any given round. If a bidder has enough eligibility to bid on certain licenses, it can place bids on the licenses individually and on packages containing those licenses without needing additional eligibility. For example, if licenses A, B, and C

each have 10,000 bidding units, and a bidder wishes in a single round to be able to bid on licenses A, B, and C individually and on packages AB and ABC, the bidder needs 30,000 bidding units of eligibility. Applicants should check their calculations carefully, as there is no provision for increasing a bidder's eligibility for Auction 73 after the upfront payment deadline.

120. The Bureau reiterates that, in the event it is necessary to conduct Auction 76, bidders will have an opportunity to supplement their upfront payments in order to increase their bidding eligibility for Auction 76. The instructions and deadline for doing so would be announced within five business days after the end of bidding in Auction 73.

121. For Auction 73 and any contingent subsequent auction, former defaulters must calculate their upfront payment for all licenses and packages by multiplying the number of bidding units on which they wish to be active by 1.5. In order to calculate the number of bidding units to assign to former defaulters, the Commission will divide the upfront payment received by 1.5 and round the result up to the nearest bidding unit.

iv. Applicant's Wire Transfer Information for Purposes of Refunds of Upfront Payments

122. To ensure that refunds of upfront payments are processed in an expeditious manner, the Commission is requesting that all pertinent information be supplied to the FCC. Applicants can provide the information electronically during the initial short-form application filing window after the form has been submitted. Applicants are reminded that information submitted as part of an FCC Form 175 will be available to the public; for that reason, wire transfer information should not be included in an FCC Form 175.

E. Auction Registration

123. Approximately ten days before the auction, the FCC will issue a public notice announcing all qualified bidders for Auction 73. Qualified bidders are those applicants whose FCC Form 175 applications have been accepted for filing and have timely submitted upfront payments sufficient to make them eligible to bid on license(s) initially offered in Auction 73.

124. All qualified bidders are automatically registered for the auction. Registration materials will be distributed prior to the auction by overnight mail. The mailing will be sent only to the contact person at the contact address listed in the FCC Form 175 and will include the SecurID ® tokens that will be required to place bids, the Integrated Spectrum Auction System (ISAS) Bidder's Guide, and the Auction Bidder Line phone number.

125. Qualified bidders that do not receive this registration mailing will not be able to submit bids. Therefore, any qualified bidder that has not received this mailing by noon on Tuesday, January 15, 2008, should call (717) 338-2868. Receipt of this registration mailing is critical to participating in the auction, and each applicant is responsible for ensuring it has received all of the registration material.

126. In the event that SecurID ® tokens are lost or damaged, only a person who has been designated as an authorized bidder, the contact person, or the certifying official on the applicant's short-form application may request replacement registration material. Qualified bidders requiring the replacement of these items must call Technical Support at (877) 480-3201 or (202) 414-1255 (TTY).

F. Remote Electronic Bidding

127. The Commission will conduct Auctions 73 and 76 over the Internet and telephonic bidding will be available as well. Qualified bidders are permitted to bid electronically and telephonically. Each applicant should indicate its bidding preference—electronic or telephonic—on the FCC Form 175. In either case, each authorized bidder must have its own SecurID ® token, which the FCC will provide at no charge. Each applicant with one authorized bidder will be issued two SecurID ® tokens, while applicants with two or three authorized bidders will be issued three tokens. For security purposes, the SecurID ® tokens, the telephonic bidding telephone number, and the Integrated Spectrum Auction System (ISAS) Bidder's Guide are only mailed to the contact person at the contact address listed on the FCC Form 175. Please note that each SecurID ® token is tailored to a specific auction; therefore, SecurID ® tokens issued for other auctions or obtained from a source other than the FCC will not work for Auction 73. In the event that it is necessary to conduct Auction 76, qualified bidders for Auction 76 will use the same SecurID ® tokens as they used for Auction 73.

128. Please note that the SecurID ® tokens can be recycled, and the Bureau encourages bidders to return the tokens to the FCC. The Bureau will provide pre-addressed envelopes that bidders may use to return the tokens once the auction is closed.

G. Mock Auction—January 18, 2008

129. All qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, January 18, 2008. The mock auction will enable applicants to become familiar with the FCC Auction System prior to the auction. Participation by all bidders is strongly recommended. Details will be announced by public notice.

IV. Auction 73

130. The first round of bidding for Auction 73 will begin on Thursday, January 24, 2008. The initial bidding schedule will be announced in a public notice listing the qualified bidders, which is to be released approximately 10 days before the start of the auction.

A. Auction 73 Structure

i. Simultaneous Multiple Round Auction With Package Bidding on C Block Licenses

131. In the
700 MHz Auction Public Notice
, the Bureau proposed using the Commission's standard simultaneous multiple-round (SMR) auction format for the A, B, D, and E Block licenses, while enabling package bidding for C Block licenses using an auction design with hierarchical package bidding (HPB). An SMR-HPB auction format offers every license for bid at the same time and consists of successive bidding rounds in which eligible bidders may place bids on individual licenses and on certain pre-defined packages of specified licenses, which, for Auction 73, only include C Block licenses. A bidder may bid on, and potentially win, any number of licenses and/or packages. Typically, bidding remains open on all licenses until bidding stops on every license, unless an alternative version of the stopping rule is invoked.

132. The
700 MHz Auction Public Notice
proposed pre-defined packages for C Block licenses according to a hierarchical structure. The initial level consists of individual licenses, and the next level consists of non-overlapping packages of those licenses, such that a given license is included only once in each level. The winning set of bids could therefore consist of bids from various levels as long as each license is included in only one winning bid. The Bureau proposed to accept individual bids on C Block licenses for REAGs 1-12 (Level 1) and package bids on the following combinations of C Block REAG licenses (Level 2): (1) REAGs 1-8 (the 50 States package); (2) REAGs 10 and 12, comprising Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and the Gulf of Mexico (the Atlantic package); and (3) REAGs 9

and 11, comprising the U.S. Pacific territories (the Pacific package).

133. The Bureau also sought comment on alternative levels or alternative ways of packaging licenses within levels. Additionally, the Bureau proposed to conduct the auction using standard SMR procedures for all of the licenses, including the C Block licenses in the event that currently unforeseen difficulties make it impracticable to implement package bidding.

134. The majority of commenters support package bidding for C Block licenses either in general or for the HPB auction format specifically. Some commenters, however, urge the Bureau to abandon package bidding for Auction 73 under the unforeseen difficulties exception to the Commission's directive to use package bidding for the C Block licenses. These parties assert that the SMR-HPB format is too complex, will disadvantage bidders interested in only individual licenses, and will not be fully understood by bidders or implemented by the Bureau in time for the start of the auction. When the Commission directed the Bureau to adopt package bidding for the C Block, it noted that package bidding minimizes exposure risk for applicants whose business plans require the economies of scale that only can be obtained with nationwide operation, but would not preclude the participation of entities wishing to bid on individual licenses. The HPB auction format was chosen in part because it mitigates issues inherent in some other package bidding formats that give bidders interested in large packages an advantage over bidders interested in individual licenses. Of course, to the extent that providing bidders the option of package bidding favors those bidders seeking packages over those seeking individual licenses, the Bureau notes that the same argument could be applied in reverse to the other 1,087 licenses in Auction 73 that bidders will not have the option to package in order to decrease their exposure risk. After review of the record, the Bureau concluded that considerations raised in the comments opposing package bidding are not the kinds of unforeseen difficulties regarding the feasibility of package bidding for the C Block licenses that the Commission envisioned in the
700 MHz Second Report and Order
.

135. Therefore, the Bureau concludes that the SMR format for A, B, E and D Block licenses, and the HPB auction format for the C Block licenses, will best meet the needs of bidders in Auction 73, and therefore adopt them as proposed. As is typical with both formats, bids will be accepted on all individual licenses and on pre-defined packages of licenses in each round of the auction until bidding stops on every license, allowing bidders to take advantage of synergies that exist among licenses.

136. With regard to the proposed pre-defined packages for C Block licenses, the Bureau declines to adopt the alternate packages suggested by two commenters. One commenter asserts that it sees value in adopting a 12 REAG package or even allowing bidders to choose their own package. The second commenter proposed adopting packages of regions larger than REAGs (e.g., East, Midwest, West Coast) and a package of only the lower 48 States. The commenter bases its proposal for a lower 48 State package on the premise that prospective nationwide bidders have limited interest in Hawaii and Alaska, and that these states would be better served if they are not included in a nationwide package. The State of Hawaii submitted reply comments challenging the assertion that nationwide carriers have little interest in providing coverage to Hawaii, noting several major carriers already do in fact operate in Hawaii. The State of Hawaii also asserts that any nationwide package without Hawaii and Alaska unfairly discriminates against these states and its inhabitants, which would not only be inconsistent with the Communications Act, but also with Commission precedent. The commenter also suggests that the Bureau eliminate the Atlantic and Pacific packages on the grounds that bidders would not obtain any benefits from bidding on the licenses as packages. The Bureau sees no disadvantages to including the packages.

137. The Commission adopted package bidding for C Block licenses to reduce the exposure problem that might otherwise inhibit bidders seeking to create a nationwide footprint. At the same time, the Commission directed the Bureau to implement package bidding without imposing disadvantages on parties that wish to bid on individual licenses comprising the nationwide footprint. The Bureau finds that offering three packages—the 50 States, Atlantic, and Pacific packages—meets this balance by reducing exposure risk of bidders seeking to provide nationwide coverage without disadvantaging those bidders seeking individual licenses. Therefore, the Bureau adopts the pre-defined packages as proposed in the
700 MHz Auction Public Notice
.

ii. Information Available to Bidders Before and During the Auctions

138. In the
700 MHz Second Report and Order
, the Commission found that the public interest would be served if the auction for new 700 MHz Band licenses is conducted using anonymous (or limited information) bidding procedures, regardless of any pre-auction measurement of likely auction competition. Such information procedures are intended to reduce the potential for anti-competitive bidding behavior, including bidding activity that aims to prevent the entry of new competitors. The Commission therefore directed the Bureau to propose and seek comment on more detailed procedures for employing anonymous bidding for the 700 MHz auction.

139. In the
700 MHz Auction Public Notice
, the Bureau proposed to withhold, until after the close of bidding, public release of (1) bidders' license selections on their short-form applications, (2) the amounts of bidders' upfront payments and bidding eligibility, and (3) information that may reveal the identities of bidders placing bids and taking other bidding-related actions. In contrast to procedures implemented for anonymous bidding in past auctions, and consistent with the
700 MHz Second Report and Order
, the Bureau proposed to withhold this information irrespective of any pre-auction measurement of likely auction competition.

140. Commenters generally support the proposal to implement limited information disclosure procedures for the 700 MHz auction, though they differ on the disclosure of specific data elements. Some commenters suggest that the Commission should inform bidders of the license(s) or license block(s) for which an overlap occurs with other applicants, citing fundamental differences between the different 700 MHz license blocks and the particular needs of small and rural bidders to better identify those bidders interested in nationwide/open access licenses. A commenter opposes disclosure of this information. The Bureau finds that revealing information on license blocks selected by competing applicants would be inconsistent with the goals of limiting information disclosure. Thus, the Bureau will not release information on licenses or license blocks selected until after the close of bidding.

141. Commenters also recommend releasing each bidder's upfront payment amount and initial bidding eligibility before the auction on the grounds that this information would help small companies better gauge the level of competition. Some entities also seek disclosure of an aggregate eligibility ratio after each round. A commenter advocates releasing the total number of

active bidders and, for each license and package, the number of bids and amount of the bids after each round. While these parties contend that release of this information would not facilitate anticompetitive practices and would not disclose bidder identities, the Bureau disagrees. As a commenter notes, release of bidder eligibility before the auction could be used by incumbents to block new entrants or for other strategic purposes. Similarly, a commenter contends that release of this information weakens anonymous bidding. This information could potentially be used to discern the identities of individual bidders. Moreover, the Bureau is particularly concerned that release of such information could foster anticompetitive bidding activity, particularly in light of the use of reserve prices in this auction.

142. Two commenters urge the Commission to release names of auction applicants and provide access to the ownership information in applicants' short form applications. This information has been made publicly available in past auctions even where limited information procedures have been implemented. The Bureau plans to continue to make available the names of applicants and their ownership information, as release of that information is necessary for other applicants to comply with the anti-collusion rules and does not undermine the purpose of its anonymous bidding procedures. To enable applicants to comply with the Commission's anti-collusion rules, once the Bureau has conducted its initial review of applications to participate in Auction 73 and Auction 76, each applicant will receive a letter that lists the other applicants in Auction 73 and Auction 76 that have applied for licenses in any of the same geographic areas as the applicant.

143. The Bureau adopts the proposals set out in the
700 MHz Auction Public Notice
. Thus, the Bureau will disclose after the conclusion of each round the amount of every bid placed and whether a bid was withdrawn. More generally, the Bureau will disclose, after the conclusion of each round, all relevant information about all bids placed, withdrawn, or dropped except for the identities of the bidders performing the actions and the net amounts of the bids placed, withdrawn, or dropped. As in past auctions conducted with limited information procedures, for each license the Bureau will indicate the minimum acceptable bid amount for the next round and whether the license has a provisionally winning bid. After each round, the Bureau will also release for each license the number of bidders that placed a bid on the license. Furthermore, the Bureau will indicate whether any proactive waivers were submitted in each round, and the Bureau will release the stage transition percentage—the percentages of licenses (as measured in bidding units) on which there were new bids—for the round. In addition, after each round, bidders logged in to the FCC Auction System will be able to see whether their own bids are provisionally winning. The Bureau will provide samples of publicly-available and bidder-specific (non-public) results files prior to the start of the auction.

144. Several commenters argue that information about the initial auction results (for Auction 73) should not be withheld in the event that a contingent auction (Auction 76) must be conducted. Some commenters urge disclosure of initial auction results for blocks that meet their reserve prices before the contingent auction, claiming that such information may be necessary to meet Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulatory requirements, to allow bidders to communicate with financial institutions, and to facilitate network build-out. Similarly, other commenters favor allowing bidders to announce that they won licenses in a block that has met its reserve price if required by law or regulation. These parties do not, however, cite any specific regulatory requirements that would compel such disclosures, and the Bureau is not aware of any such regulations. To the extent that any such requirements are related to winning bidders' payments, the Bureau notes that if Auction 76 were to be held, winning bidders in Auction 73 of licenses in the A, B, C, or E Blocks will not be required to make down payments until after the subsequent bidding. The Bureau finds that premature disclosure to financial institutions, vendors, and others of identities of successful bidders in Auction 73 would undermine the purposes of the limited information procedures.

145. Regarding Auction 76 and the timing of information disclosure, the Bureau adopts its proposal not to release until after the close of bidding in both auctions: (a) Information on the winning bidders for licenses in blocks for which the reserve price was met in the first auction, (b) information on bidder license selections and eligibility, and (c) any other information that may reveal the identities of bidders placing bids and taking other bidding-related actions on licenses in all blocks. For the D Block, however, in the event there is a winning bidder for the D Block license in Auction 73, the Bureau will make public before the close of bidding in an Auction 76 only such information as may be necessary to proceed with promptly facilitating the D Block winner's obligations to negotiate a Network Sharing Agreement with the national Public Safety Broadband Licensee in the adjacent spectrum block.

146. Commenting parties also urge the Commission to allow applicants to opt-out of Auction 76 in order to be free of anti-collusion prohibition, so long as bidder certifies that its decision has not been based on discussion with other parties concerning auction strategy or post-auction market structure. As one commenter acknowledges, reversal of the Commission's determination on this issue would need to be addressed by full Commission. As such, the Bureau cannot implement such a change in this proceeding.

147.
Other Issues
. The Bureau concluded in the rulemaking proceeding that the information disclosure procedures established for this auction will not interfere with the administration of or compliance with the Commission's anti-collusion rule. Section 1.2105(c)(1) of the Commission's rules provides that after the short-form application filing deadline, all applicants for licenses in any of the same geographic license areas are prohibited from disclosing to each other in any manner the substance of bids or bidding strategies until after the down payment deadline, subject to specified exceptions. When limited information procedures are not in effect for a particular auction, each applicant's selection of licenses has been publicly available through the Commission's online short-form application database. In Auction 73 and Auction 76, however, the Commission will not disclose information regarding license selection or the amounts of bidders” upfront payments and bidding eligibility. As in the past, the Commission will disclose the other portions of applicants” short-form applications, through its online database and certain application-based information through public notices. Thus, even without information regarding license selection, applicants would be able to comply with § 1.2105(c) by not disclosing bids or bidding strategies to any other applicants in the auction. This approach, however, could inhibit otherwise lawful communications with applicants for licenses in other geographic license areas, which the Commission's anti-collusion rule permits.

148. Consequently, the Bureau will notify separately each applicant with short-form applications to participate in a pending auction whether applicants in Auction 73 and Auction 76 have applied for licenses in any of the same geographic areas as that applicant. Specifically, after the Bureau conducts its initial review of applications to participate in Auction 73 and Auction 76, each applicant with a pending short-form application will receive a letter that lists the applicants in Auction 73 and Auction 76 that have applied for licenses in any of the same geographic areas as the applicant. The list will identify the Auction 73 and Auction 76 applicant(s) by name but will not list the license selections of the Auction 73 and Auction 76 applicant(s). As in past auctions, additional information regarding applicants in Auction 73 and Auction 76 that is needed to comply with § 1.2105(c),
e.g.
, the identities of controlling interest(s) in an applicant and ownership interests greater than ten percent, will be available through the publicly accessible online short-form application database.

149. When completing short-form applications, applicants should avoid any statements or disclosures that may violate the Commission's anti-collusion rule, particularly in light of the Commission's procedures regarding the availability of certain information in Auction 73 and Auction 76. While applicants” license selection will not be disclosed until after Auction 73 and Auction 76 close, the Commission will disclose other portions of short-form applications through its on-line database and public notices. Accordingly, applicants should avoid including any information in their short-form applications that might convey information regarding license selections. For example, applicants should avoid using applicant names that refer to licenses being offered, referring to certain licenses or markets in describing bidding agreements, or including any information in attachments that may otherwise disclose applicants” license selections. If an applicant is found to have violated the Commission's rules or antitrust laws in connection with its participation in the competitive bidding process, the applicant may be subject to various sanctions, including forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and prohibition from participating in future auctions.

iii. Eligibility and Activity Rules

150. The Bureau will use upfront payments to determine initial (maximum) eligibility (as measured in bidding units) for Auction 73. The amount of the upfront payment submitted by a bidder determines initial bidding eligibility, the maximum number of bidding units on which a bidder may be active. Each license is assigned a specific number of bidding units listed in Attachment A of the
Auctions 73 and 76 Procedures Public Notice
. Bidding units for a given license do not change as prices rise during the auction. A bidder's upfront payment is not attributed to specific licenses or packages. Rather, a bidder may place bids on any of the licenses selected on its FCC Form 175 as long as the total number of bidding units associated with those licenses does not exceed its current eligibility. Eligibility cannot be increased during Auction 73; it can only remain the same or decrease. Thus, in calculating its upfront payment amount, an applicant must determine the maximum number of bidding units it may wish to bid on or hold provisionally winning bids on in any single round, and submit an upfront payment amount covering that total number of bidding units. At a minimum, an applicant's upfront payment must cover the bidding units for at least one of the licen

[Text truncated at 120,000 characters. The full text is on the page linked above.]

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/fr%3AE7-21528. Public record. Not legal advice.
