# Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/fr%3A97-19659

## Record

- **Collection:** Federal Register
- **Document type:** Notice
- **Published:** July 25, 1997
- **Citation:** 62 FR 40075

## Text

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-5482-6]

Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments

Availability of EPA comments prepared June 30, 1997 through July
04, 1997 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under
Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National
Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA
comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at (202)
564-7167.
An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 04, 1997 (62
FR 16154).

Draft EISs

ERP No. D-BLM-K67043-AZ Rating E02, Cyprus Miami Mining Leach
Facility Expansion Project, Construction and Operation, Plan of
Operations Approval and COE Section 404 Permit, Gila County, AZ.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections since the proposed
alternative does not appear to be the least environmentally damaging
practicable alternative in accordance with guidelines pursuant to Clean
Water Act, Section 404. EPA believed additional financial assurance is
needed for the contingency of collecting and managing mine leachate. A
Clean Air Act conformity analysis is needed as the proposed facility
would generate an increase of over 100 tons per year of pollutants.

Final EISs

ERP No. F-AFS-L39041-OR Metolius Wild and Scenic River Management
Plan, Implementation, Deschutes National Forest, Sisters Range
District, Jefferson County, OR.
Summary: Review of the Final EIS was not deemed necessary. No
formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
ERP No. F-COE-E90015-00, Pearl River in the Vicinity of Walkiah
Bluff, Wetland Restoration, Implementation, Picayune, Pearl River
County, MS and St. Tammany Parish, LA.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns over the ability of
the project to maintain the proposed redirected flow regime on a long-
term basis, and suggested that the Corps develop a monitoring program
to review the project's status over a five-year period.
ERP No. F-SFW-L99005-WA, Plum Creek Timber Sale, Issuance of a
Permit to Allow Incidental Take and Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) for
Threatened and Endangered Species, Implementation, Eastern and Western
Cascade Provinces in the Cascade Mountains, King and Kittitas Counties,
WA.
Summary: Review of the Final EIS was not deemed necessary. No
formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.

Dated: July 22, 1997.
William D. Dickerson,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 97-19659 Filed 7-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/fr%3A97-19659. Public record. Not legal advice.