# Indiana Regulatory Program

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/fr%3A96-13264

## Record

- **Collection:** Federal Register
- **Document type:** Rule
- **Published:** May 28, 1996
- **Citation:** 61 FR 26442

## Text

[[Page 26443]]

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 914

[SPATS No. IN-112-FOR; Amendment No. 92-7C]

Indiana Regulatory Program

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.

ACTION: Final rule; clarification/approval of amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSM is clarifying the previous approval, and noted deferrals
therein, of an amendment to the Indiana permanent regulatory program
(hereinafter referred to as the ``Indiana program'') under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The amendment
consisted of revisions to Indiana's Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation
Rules concerning the control of subsidence caused by underground mining
operations. The amendment was submitted to revise the Indiana program
to be consistent with SMCRA and to incorporate State initiatives.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 28, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Roger W. Calhoun, Director, Indianapolis Field Office, Office of
Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Minton-Capehart Federal
Building, 575 North Pennsylvania Street, Room 301, Indianapolis,
Indiana 46204-1521, Telephone (317) 226-6166.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background on the Indiana Program
II. Submission of the Proposed Amendment
III. Director's Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. Director's Decision
VI. Procedural Determinations

I. Background on the Indiana Program

On July 29, 1982, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally
approved the Indiana program. Background information on the Indiana
program, including the Secretary's findings, the disposition of
comments, and the conditions of approval can be found in the July 26,
1982, Federal Register (47 FR 32107). Subsequent actions concerning the
conditions of approval and program amendments can be found at 30 CFR
914.10, 914.15, and 914.16.

II. Submission of the Proposed Amendment

By letter dated December 2, 1992 (Administrative Record No. IND-
1175), the Indiana Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) submitted a
proposed amendment (#92-7) to the Indiana program. Amendment #92-7
proposed changes to the Indiana surface mining rules concerning
subsidence liability.
On May 17, 1993, OSM approved, with two exceptions, amendment #92-7
(58 FR 28775). By letter dated March 18, 1994 (Administrative Record
Number IND-1340), Indiana submitted to OSM a notice of the final
adoption of amendment #92-7 as published in the Indiana Register,
Volume 17, Number 6, pages 1086-1089 (March 1, 1994).
The final adopted language of amendment #92-7 differed in some ways
from the language approved by OSM on May 17, 1993. Therefore, OSM
reopened the public comment period and invited comment on the
substantive differences.
OSM announced receipt of the proposed amendment (i.e., the adopted
language of #92-7) in the April 22, 1994, Federal Register (59 FR
19155), and in the same document opened the public comment period and
provided opportunity for a public hearing on the adequacy of the
proposed amendment. The comment period closed on May 23, 1994.
On April 20, 1995, OSM approved the amendment with deferrals on
decisions in three areas until July 31, 1995, when OSM was to address
the enforcement of SMCRA section 720 and 30 CFR 784.20 and 817.121 (60
FR 19669). The deferrals related to the above enforcement provisions
during the period from the effective date of SMCRA section 720 (October
24, 1992) to the effective date of the corresponding Indiana statute IC
13-4.1-9-2.5 (June 30, 1994).
On July 28, 1995, OSM announced its decision on initial enforcement
of underground coal mine subsidence control and water replacement
requirements in Indiana (60 FR 38680). After consultation with Indiana
and consideration of public comments, OSM decided that initial
enforcement in Indiana would be accomplished through joint Indiana and
OSM enforcement. OSM, however, did not specifically address the
deferrals of the April 20, 1995, approval (60 FR 19669).

III. Director's Findings

Set forth below, pursuant to SMCRA and the Federal regulations at
30 CFR 732.15 and 732.17, are the Director's findings concerning the
deferrals contained in the original approval of the proposed amendment
(60 FR 19669). These findings are based on the original proposed
amendment and the April 20, 1995, approval and deferrals related to the
enforcement scheme as published on July 28, 1995. It should be noted
that the July 28, 1995, decision addressed only the initial enforcement
schemes for water replacement (30 CFR 817.41(j)) and subsidence damage
repair/compensation (30 CFR 817.121(c)(2)) provided for under section
720 of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA),
as amended by the Energy Policy Act of 1992, Pub. L. 102-486, 106 Stat.
2776(1992). In addition to the basic water supply replacement
requirement and the related subsidence damage repair requirement, the
implementing Federal regulations that became effective March 31, 1995,
contain other related supporting and permitting provisions. OSM
anticipates that these other requirements will become effective in the
same way as other revisions to the permanent program regulations; i.e.,
in primacy states such as Indiana, upon adoption of counterpart State
regulatory program provisions (60 FR 16722). This process will be
initiated separately by OSM under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(d)).

1. 310 IAC 12-3-87.1 Subsidence Control Plan

310 IAC 12-3-87.1(c)(2). In the April 20, 1995, Federal Register,
the Director approved the language at subsection 87.1(c)(2) to the
extent that it met the requirements of SMCRA section 720 and 30 CFR
784.20 from June 30, 1994. However, the Director deferred a decision
until July 31, 1995, on the enforcement of the provisions of SMCRA
section 720 and 30 CFR 784.20 during the period from the effective date
of SMCRA section 720 (October 24, 1992) to the effective date of the
corresponding Indiana statute IC 13-4.1-9-2.5 (June 30, 1994).
On July 28, 1995, OSM announced its decision on initial enforcement
of underground coal mine subsidence control and water replacement
requirements in Indiana (60 FR 38680). After consultation with Indiana
and consideration of public comments, OSM decided that initial
enforcement in Indiana would be accomplished through joint Indiana and
OSM enforcement. In discussions leading to this decision, Indiana
indicated that Indiana law at IC 13-4.1-9-2.5 incorporates the
substantive language of section 620 of SMCRA and applies to underground
mining operations conducted after June 30, 1994. For underground mining
operations conducted in Indiana in the interim period between October
24, 1992 (the effective date of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 and SMCRA
section 720), and June 30, 1994 (the effective

[[Page 26444]]

date of Indiana law counterpart to the Energy Policy Act of 1992), the
State concluded that the existing Indiana program provisions provide
the IDNR with sufficient authority to impose the requirements of the
Energy Policy Act of 1992 with respect to underground mining operations
conducted in Indiana during the interim period. The State concluded,
however, that although it believes that the IDNR has sufficient
authority to impose the requirements of the Energy Policy Act of 1992
during the interim period, joint State and OSM enforcement in Indiana
should be the chosen enforcement scheme in Indiana, as it would assure
protection for the citizens of Indiana during the interim period
(Administrative Record Number IND-1494). Under this scheme, the IDNR
would enforce the requirements of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 in
Indiana from June 30,1994, and during the interim period to the extent
permissible under Indiana law. OSM would enforce the requirements of
the Energy Policy Act of 1992 in the interim period only if a situation
arose where the State could not so enforce.
Based on the discussion above, the Director finds that 310 IAC 12-
3-87.1(c)(2) is no less effective than 30 CFR 784.20 and no less
stringent than SMCRA section 720, to the extent that IC 13-4.1-9-2.5
meets the requirements of SMCRA section 720 and 30 CFR 784.20 from June
30, 1994, and the enforcement scheme approved July 28, 1995, meets the
requirements of SMCRA section 720 and 30 CFR 784.20 during the period
from the effective date of SMCRA section 720 (October 24, 1992) to the
effective date of IC 13-4.1-9-2.5 (June 30, 1994).

2. 310 IAC 12-5-130.1 Subsidence Control; General Requirements

310 IAC 12-5-130.1(c)(2). In the April 20,1995, Federal Register,
the Director approved the language at subsection 130.1(c)(2) to the
extent that it met the requirements of SMCRA section 720 from June 30,
1994. However, the Director deferred a decision until July 31, 1995, on
the enforcement of the provisions of SMCRA section 720 and 30 CFR
817.121 during the period from the effective date of SMCRA section 720
(October 24, 1992) to the effective date of the corresponding Indiana
statute IC 13-4.1-9-2.5 (June 30, 1994).
As discussed in Finding 1 above, on July 28, 1995, OSM announced
its decision on initial enforcement of underground coal mine subsidence
control and water replacement requirements in Indiana (60 FR 38680).
OSM decided that initial enforcement would be accomplished through
joint Indiana and OSM enforcement. The IDNR would enforce the
requirements of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 in Indiana from June 30,
1994, and during the interim period (October 24, 1992-June 30, 1994) to
the extent permissible under Indiana law. OSM would enforce the
requirements of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 in the interim period
only if a situation arose where the State could not so enforce.
Based on the above discussion, the Director finds that 310 IAC 12-
5-130.1(c)(2) is no less effective than 30 CFR 817.121(c)(2) and no
less stringent than SMCRA section 720, to the extent that IC 13-4.1-9-
2.5 meets the requirements of SMCRA section 720 from June 30, 1994, and
the enforcement scheme approved July 28, 1995, meets the requirements
of SMCRA section 720 and 30 CFR 817.121(c)(2) during the period from
the effective date of SMCRA section 720 (October 24, 1992) to the
effective date of IC 13-4.1-9-2.5 (June 30, 1994).

3. Repeal of 310 IAC 12-5-132

Indiana proposed the repeal of 310 IAC 12-3-87, 310 IAC 12-5-130,
310 IAC 12-5-131, and 310 IAC 12-5-132 because the provisions were
replaced by 310 IAC 12-3-87.1, 310 IAC 12-5-130.1, and 310 IAC 12-5-
131.1. The Director deferred decision on the repeal of 310 IAC 12-5-132
until July 31, 1995, when OSM was to address the enforcement of the
provisions of SMCRA section 720 and 30 CFR 784.20 and 817.121 during
the period from the effective date of SMCRA section 720 (October 24,
1992) to the effective date of IC 13-4.1-9-2.5 (June 30, 1994).
As discussed in Findings 1 and 2 above, on July 28, 1995, OSM
announced its decision on initial enforcement of underground coal mine
subsidence control and water replacement requirements in Indiana (60 FR
38680), finding that initial enforcement would be accomplished through
joint Indiana and OSM enforcement. IDNR would enforce the requirements
of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 in Indiana from June 30, 1994, and
during the interim period (October 24, 1992-June 30, 1994) to the
extent permissible under Indiana law. OSM would enforce the
requirements of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 in the interim period
only if a situation arose where the State would not so enforce.
Based on the above discussion, the Director is approving the repeal
of 310 IAC 12-5-132 because appropriate provisions are replaced by 310
IAC 12-3-87.1 and 310 IAC 12-5-130.1 and the repeal does not render the
Indiana program less effective than the counterpart Federal
requirements to the extent that IC 13-4.1-9-2.5 meets the requirements
of SMCRA section 720 from June 30, 1994, and the enforcement scheme
approved July 28, 1995, meets the requirements of SMCRA section 720 and
30 CFR 784.20 and 817.121(c)(2) during the period from the effective
date of SMCRA section 720 (October 24, 1992) to the effective date of
IC 13-4.1-9-2.5 (June 30, 1994).

IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments

Comments on the initial submittal were solicited from Federal
agencies and the public on January 14, 1993 (58 FR 4372), and on the
adopted language of the approved changes on April 22, 1994 (59 FR
19155). Comments received were discussed in the related Federal
Registers of May 17, 1993 (58 FR 28775), and April 20, 1995 (60 FR
19669), respectively. As this current action is based on language of
the previous submittals, the solicitation of additional comments is not
necessary; refer to the Federal Registers identified above for the
discussion of comments received.

V. Director's Decision

Based on the findings above, the Director is approving the three
provisions of Indiana's program amendment concerning subsidence, as
originally submitted by Indiana on March 18, 1994, and for which the
decisions were deferred in the April 20, 1995, Federal Register (60 FR
19669). As discussed above in Finding 1 concerning 310 IAC 12-3-
87.1(c)(2) and Finding 2 concerning 310 IAC 12-5-130.1(c)(2), the
Director is approving the proposed deference to State law to the extent
that IC 13-4.1-9-2.5 meets the requirements of SMCRA section 720 from
June 30, 1994, and the enforcement scheme approved July 28, 1995, meets
the requirements of SMCRA section 720 and 30 CFR 784.20 and
817.121(c)(2) during the period from the effective date of SMCRA
section 720 (October 24, 1992) to the effective date of IC 13-4.1-9-2.5
(June 30, 1994). As discussed in Finding 3, the Director is also
approving the repeal of 310 IAC 12-5-132.
The Federal regulations at 30 CFR Part 914, codifying decisions
concerning the Indiana program, are being amended to implement this
decision.

VI. Procedural Determinations

Executive Order 12866

This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review).

[[Page 26445]]

Executive Order 12988

The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) and has
determined that, to the extent allowed by law, this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that section.
However, these standards are not applicable to the actual language of
State regulatory programs and program amendments since each such
program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by OSM.
Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and 30
CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State
regulatory programs and program amendments submitted by the States must
be based solely on a determination of whether the submittal is
consistent with SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and
whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.

National Environmental Policy Act

No environmental impact statement is required for this rule since
section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C
4332(2)(C)).

Paperwork Reduction Act

This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal which is the subject of this rule is based upon
corresponding Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements
previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In
making the determination as to whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and
assumptions for the corresponding Federal regulations.

Unfunded Mandates

This rule will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any
given year on any governmental entity or the private sector.

List of Subjects in 30 CFR 914

Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.

Dated: May 8, 1996.
Brent Wahlquist,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Regional Coordinating Center.

For the reasons set out in the preamble, Title 30, Chapter VII,
Subchapter T of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as set forth
below:

PART 914--INDIANA

1. The authority citation for Part 914 continues to read as
follows:

Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.

2. Section 914.15 is amended by adding paragraph (qqq) to read as
follows:

Sec. 914.15 Approval of regulatory program amendments.

* * * * *
(qqq) The revised provisions at 310 IAC 12-3-87.1(c)(2) and 310 IAC
12-5-130.1(c)(2) and the repeal of 310 IAC 12-5-132 contained in
Indiana's program amendment concerning subsidence, as originally
submitted by Indiana on March 18, 1994, and for which the decisions
were deferred on April 20, 1995, are approved effective May 28, 1996.

[FR Doc. 96-13264 Filed 5-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-M

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/fr%3A96-13264. Public record. Not legal advice.
