# Light Scattering Instruments and Parts Thereof from Japan; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/fr%3A95-24301

## Record

- **Collection:** Federal Register
- **Document type:** Notice
- **Published:** September 29, 1995
- **Citation:** 60 FR 50551

## Text

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A-588-813]

Light Scattering Instruments and Parts Thereof from Japan; Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of final results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 16, 1995, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary results of its administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on light-scattering instruments
and parts thereof from Japan (60 FR 42527). The review covered one
manufacturer/exporter, Otsuka Electronics Co., Ltd. (Otsuka), of the
subject merchandise and the review period November 1, 1993, through
October 31, 1994.
We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on our
preliminary results. We received no comments. The final results are
unchanged from those presented in the preliminary results.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 29, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leon McNeill or Maureen Flannery,
Office of Antidumping Compliance, Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-
4733.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On November 19, 1990, the Department published in the Federal
Register the antidumping duty order on light-scattering instruments
(LSIs) and parts thereof from Japan (55 FR 48144). On November 10,
1994, the Department published a notice in the Federal Register
notifying interested parties of the opportunity to request an
administrative review of light-scattering instruments and parts thereof
from Japan (59 FR 56034). On November 2, 1994, petitioner, Wyatt
Technology Corporation (Wyatt) requested, in accordance with 19 CFR
353.22(a), that we conduct an administrative review of exports to the
United States by Otsuka, for the period November 1, 1993, through
October 31, 1994. We published a notice of initiation of the
antidumping duty administrative review on December 15, 1994 (59 FR
64650). On August 16, 1995, the Department published in the Federal
Register the preliminary results of its administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on light-scattering instruments and parts
thereof from Japan (60 FR 42527). The Department has now completed that
review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).

Applicable Statutes and Regulations

Unless otherwise stated, all citations to the statutes and to the
Department's regulations are references to the provisions as they
existed on December 31, 1994.

Scope of the Review

The products covered by this administrative review are light-
scattering instruments and parts thereof from Japan. The Department
defines such merchandise as LSIs and the parts thereof, specified
below, that have classical measurement capabilities, whether or not
also capable of dynamic measurement. Classical measurement (also known
as static measurement) capability usually means the ability to measure
absolutely (i.e., without reference to molecular standards) the weight
and size of macromolecules and submicron particles in solution, as well
as certain molecular interaction parameters, such as the so-called
second viral coefficient. (An instrument that uses single-angle instead
of multi-angle measurement can only measure molecular weight and the
second viral coefficient.) Dynamic measurement (also known as quasi-
elastic measurement) capability refers to the ability to measure the
diffusion coefficient of molecules or particles in suspension and
deduce therefrom features of their size and size distribution. LSIs
subject to this review employ laser light and may use either a single-
angle or multi-angle technique.
The following parts are included in the scope of this
administrative review when they are manufactured according to
specifications and operational requirements for use only in an LSI as
defined in the preceding paragraph: scanning photomultiplier
assemblies, immersion baths (to provide temperature stability and/or
refractive index matching), sample-containing structures, electronic
signal-processing boards, molecular characterization software,
preamplifier/discriminator circuitry, and optical benches. LSIs subject
to this review may be sold inclusive or exclusive of accessories such
as personal computers, cathode ray tube displays, software, or printer.
LSIs are currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS)
subheading 9027.30.40. LSI parts are currently classifiable under HTS
subheading 9027.90.40. HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and
U.S. Customs Service purposes. The written product description remains
dispositive. Different items with the same name as subject parts may
enter under subheading 9027.90.40. To avoid the unintended suspension
of liquidation of non-subject parts, those items entered under
subheading 9027.90.40 and generally known as scanning photomultiplier
assemblies, immersion baths, sample-containing structures, electronic
signal-processing boards, molecular characterization software,
preamplifier/discriminator circuitry, and optical benches must be
accompanied by an importer's

[[Page 50552]]
declaration to the Customs Service stating that they are not
manufactured for use in a subject LSI.

Final Results of the Review

We invited interested parties to comment on the preliminary
results. We received no comments. The final results are therefore
unchanged from those presented in the preliminary results, and we
determine, based on the best information available, that a margin of
129.71 percent exists for Otsuka for the period November 1, 1993,
through October 31, 1994.
Furthermore, the following deposit requirements will be effective
for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of these
final results, as provided by section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rate for Otsuka will be the rate established in the final
results of this review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or
the original less than fair value (LTFV) investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the
manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor
the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previous review by
the Department, the cash deposit rate will be 129.71 percent, the all
other rate established in the LTFV investigation.
These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until publication
of the final results of the next administrative review.
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 353.34(d). Timely written notification of
return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This administrative review and notice are in accordance with
section 751(a)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR 353.22.

Dated: September 22, 1995.
Susan G. Esserman,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-24301 Filed 9-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/fr%3A95-24301. Public record. Not legal advice.
