# Commercial Mobile Radio Services; Louisiana State Petition to Retain Existing Jurisdiction Over Commercial Mobile Radio Services

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/fr%3A94-25542

## Record

- **Collection:** Federal Register
- **Document type:** Uncategorized Document
- **Published:** October 17, 1994

## Text

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

46 CFR Chapter I

[PR Docket No. 94-107; DA 94-1085]

Commercial Mobile Radio Services; Louisiana State Petition to
Retain Existing Jurisdiction Over Commercial Mobile Radio Services

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of time.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The amendments to the Communications Act in the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1993 preempted state rate and entry regulation of
commercial mobile radio services. States were given the opportunity to
file petitions for the authority to continue regulating these
intrastate rates. This Order extends the deadlines for reply comments
in this proceeding in response to a request filed by the Louisiana
Public Service Commission. This extension will provide interested
parties enough time to complete their review and submit meaningful
replies on the issues we raised in this proceeding.

DATES: Reply comments must be filed on or before October 14, 1994.

ADDRESSES: FCC, 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regina Harrison, Private Radio Bureau, Land Mobile and Microwave
Division, (202) 632-7125.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Order

Adopted: October 4, 1994.
Released: October 4, 1994.

By the Chief, Private Radio Bureau:
1. The Louisiana Public Service Commission (Louisiana) has filed an
``emergency'' motion for a 10-day extension of time from the October 4,
1994 deadline for filing reply comments, and a motion for expedited
consideration of that motion.\1\ For the reasons given below, we grant
the motion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\Morion for Expedited Consideration of Emergency Motion on
Behalf of the Louisiana Public Service Commission for 10-Day
Extension of Time to Reply to Comments Filed by Various Mobile
Carriers (dated Oct. 3, 1994) (Motion to Expedite); Emergency Motion
on Behalf of the Louisiana Public Service Commission for 10-Day
Extension of Time to Reply to Comments Filed by Various Mobile
Carriers (dated Oct. 3, 1994) (Emergency Motion).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. The amendments to the Communications Act in the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1993 preempted state rate and entry regulation of
commercial mobile radio services. A state could, however, obtain
intrastate rate regulatory authority by filing a properly supported
petition with the FCC.\2\ States with existing rate regulation could
petition by August 10, 1994 to continue regulating, and would obtain a
stay of statutory preemption until the FCC acted. The Commission has
one year in which to rule on the petition and to decide any
reconsideration. Louisiana filed such a petition on August 9, 1994.
Pursuant to the Commission's rules,\3\ interested parties had 30 days
in which to comment and then 15 days for replies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\2\Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, Pub. L. No. 103-
66, Title VI, Sec. 6002(b)(2), 107 Stat. 312, 392 (1993), amending
Section 332(c)(3) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 332(c)(3).
\3\Second Report and Order, Implementation of Sections 3(n) and
332 of the Communications Act, Regulatory Treatment of Mobile
Services, 9 FCC Rcd 1411, 1522-23 (1994), 59 FR 18493 (Apr. 19,
1994) (to be codified at 47 CFR 20.13).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Louisiana states that an extension ``is necessary in order to
provide the Commission with a complete and accurate record on which to
decide the numerous complex issues in this matter.'' The State claims
that this extension ``will not cause any undue hardship to any party
nor will it retard the progress of this proceeding.''\4\ It adds that
this proceeding will affect state interests in the manner in which
mobile carriers are regulated, the development of the industry, and the
rates paid by and services rendered to Louisiana ratepayers. It states
that it has a constitutional charge to protect ratepayers'
interests.\5\ In requesting expedited consideration, Louisiana states
that it has orally notified counsel of record of the filing of its
motions.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\4\Emergency Motion at 1.
\5\Emergency Motion at 3.
\6\Motion to Expedite at 2. See also 47 CFR 1.46.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. We believe that the motion has merit. The record in this
proceeding is large, and the issues, including the state of competition
in the cellular market in the state and the reasonableness of rates,
intricate. We find that good cause has been shown for the requested
extension.
5. Pursuant to Sec. 1.46 of the Commission's Rules,\7\ we GRANT the
Motion for Expedited Consideration of Emergency Motion on Behalf of the
Louisiana Public Service Commission for 10-Day Extension of Time to
Reply to Comments Filed by Various Mobile Carriers and the Emergency
Motion on Behalf of the Louisiana Public Service Commission for 10-Day
Extension of Time to Reply to Comments Filed by Various Mobile
Carriers, And Hereby Extend the period for filing replies UNTIL October
14, 1994.

\7\47 CFR 1.46.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Communications Commission.
Ralph A. Haller,
Chief, Private Radio Bureau.
[FR Doc. 94-25542 Filed 10-14-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/fr%3A94-25542. Public record. Not legal advice.
