# National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List Update

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/fr%3A94-21370

## Record

- **Collection:** Federal Register
- **Document type:** Uncategorized Document
- **Published:** August 30, 1994

## Text

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300

[FRL-5062-2]

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List Update

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of Deletion of the Wide Beach Development site from the
National Priorities List (NPL).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region II,
announces the deletion of the Wide Beach Development site from the NPL.
The NPL is Appendix B of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances
Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), which EPA promulgated pursuant to
Section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended. EPA and the State of New York
have determined that all appropriate Hazardous Substance Response Trust
Fund (Fund)-financed responses under CERCLA have been implemented and
that no further cleanup by responsible parties is appropriate.
Moreover, EPA and the State of New York have determined that remedial
actions conducted at the site to date have been protective of public
health, welfare, and the environment.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 30, 1994.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Herbert H. King, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region II, 26 Federal
Plaza, Room 29-102, New York, NY 10278, (212) 264-1129.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The site to be deleted from the NPL is: Wide
Beach Development site, Brant, New York.
The closing date for comments on the Notice of Intent to Delete was
April 30, 1994. EPA received two comment letters. One commentor
suggested that deleting the site from the NPL at this time is
premature, because he believes that an on-site wetland was not properly
restored and because the owner of the restored wetland has cut down
some trees and shrubs located on the wetland. The commentor also
suggested that the site not be deleted from the NPL since a number of
contractual claims have not been resolved with the remedial action
contractor. The second commentor expressed concern about the possible
instability of the treated soil that was used as fill on a portion of
her property. This commentor also expressed concern about possible
problems disposing of the treated soil, in the event that a home were
to be built on her property. EPA's response to the first commentor is
that the design of the wetlands restoration was performed by an
experienced landscape architect and biologist and that the restored
wetland is the functional equivalent of the original wetland. EPA also
noted that, because of its small size, this wetland is not covered by
New York State wetland regulations; and since it is an isolated wetland
and of limited size, disturbances of up to one acre do not require a
federal permit. Therefore, the land owner's removal of trees and shrubs
from the restored wetland is not in violation of state or federal
wetland regulations. In addition, EPA indicated that, since the
unresolved claims are contractual issues, they are not relevant to
deleting the site from the NPL. To the second commentor, EPA noted that
the treated soil has been stable since 1991, and that, since the
treated soil is nonhazardous, it could be disposed of in the same
manner as any other excavated, nonhazardous soils.
EPA identifies sites which appear to present a significant risk to
public health, welfare, or the environment and it maintains the NPL as
the list of those sites. Sites on the NPL may be the subject of Fund-
financed remedial actions. Any site deleted from the NPL remains
eligible for Fund-financed remedial actions in the unlikely event that
conditions at the site warrant such action. Section 300.425 (e)(3) of
the NCP states that Fund-financed actions may be taken at sites deleted
from the NPL. Deletion of a site from the NPL does not affect
responsible party liability or impede EPA's efforts to recover costs
associated with response efforts.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Water pollution
control, Water supply.

40 CFR part 300 is amended as follows:

PART 300--[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as
follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; 33 U.S.C. 1321 (c)(2); E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp.: p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp.: p.193.

Appendix B [Amended]

2. Table 1 of Appendix B to part 300 is amended by removing the
Wide Beach Development site, Brant, New York.
Dated: August 17, 1994.
William J. Muszynski,
Deputy Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 94-21370 Filed 8-29-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/fr%3A94-21370. Public record. Not legal advice.
