# Medicare Program: Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems; Quality Reporting Programs; Payment for Intensive Outpatient Services in Hospital Outpatient Departments, Community Mental Health Centers, Rural Health Clinics, Federally Qualified Health Centers, and Opioid Treatment Programs; Hospital Price Transparency; Changes to Community Mental Health Centers Conditions of Participation, Changes to the Inpatient Prospective Payment System Medicare Code Editor; Rural Emergency Hospital Conditions of Participation Technical Correction

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/fr%3A2023-24293

## Record

- **Collection:** Federal Register
- **Document type:** Rule
- **Published:** November 22, 2023
- **Citation:** 88 FR 81540

## Text

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
42 CFR Parts 405, 410, 416, 419, 424, 485, 488, and 489
Office of the Secretary
45 CFR Part 180
[CMS-1786-FC]
RIN 0938-AV09
Medicare Program: Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems; Quality Reporting Programs; Payment for Intensive Outpatient Services in Hospital Outpatient Departments, Community Mental Health Centers, Rural Health Clinics, Federally Qualified Health Centers, and Opioid Treatment Programs; Hospital Price Transparency; Changes to Community Mental Health Centers Conditions of Participation, Changes to the Inpatient Prospective Payment System Medicare Code Editor; Rural Emergency Hospital Conditions of Participation Technical Correction

AGENCY:

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION:

Final rule with comment period.

SUMMARY:

This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for calendar year 2024 based on our continuing experience with these systems. In this final rule, we describe the changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare services paid under the OPPS and those paid under the ASC payment system. Also, this final rule updates and refines the requirements for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, the ASC Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program, and the Rural Emergency Hospital Quality Reporting (REHQR) Program. In this final rule, we are also establishing a payment for certain intensive outpatient services under Medicare, beginning January 1, 2024. In addition, this final rule updates and refines requirements for hospitals to make public their standard charge information and enforcement of hospital price transparency. We are finalizing changes to the community mental health center (CMHC) Conditions of Participation (CoPs) to provide requirements for furnishing intensive outpatient (IOP) services, and we are finalizing the proposed personnel qualifications for mental health counselors (MHCs) and marriage and family therapists (MFTs). Additionally, we are finalizing the removal of discussion of the inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) Medicare Code Editor (MCE) from the annual IPPS rulemakings, beginning with the fiscal year (FY) 2025 rulemaking. Finally, we are finalizing a technical correction to the Rural Emergency Hospital (REH) CoPs under the standard for the designation and certification of REHs.

DATES:

Effective date:
The provisions of this rule are effective January 1, 2024.

Comment period:
To be assured consideration, comments must be received at one of the addresses provided below, by January 1, 2024.

ADDRESSES:

In commenting, please refer to file code CMS-1786-FC.

Comments, including mass comment submissions, must be submitted in one of the following three ways (please choose only one of the ways listed):

1.
Electronically.
You may submit electronic comments on this regulation to
https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the “Submit a comment” instructions.

2.
By regular mail.
You may mail written comments to the following address ONLY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-1786-FC, P.O. Box 8010, Baltimore, MD 21244-8010.

Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received before the close of the comment period.

3.
By express or overnight mail.
You may send written comments to the following address ONLY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-1786-FC, Mail Stop C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.

For information on viewing public comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Au'Sha Washington,
AushaWashington@cms.hhs.gov
or 410-786-3736.

Advisory Panel on Hospital Outpatient Payment (HOP Panel), contact the HOP Panel mailbox at
APCPanel@cms.hhs.gov
.

Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) Payment System, contact Scott Talaga via email at
Scott.Talaga@cms.hhs.gov
or Mitali Dayal via email at
Mitali.Dayal2@cms.hhs.gov.

Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program policies, contact Anita Bhatia via email at
Anita.Bhatia@cms.hhs.gov.

Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program measures, contact Marsha Hertzberg via email at
marsha.hertzberg@cms.hhs.gov.

Biosimilars Packaging Exception, contact Gil Ngan via email at
gil.ngan@cms.hhs.gov.

Blood and Blood Products, contact Josh McFeeters via email at
Joshua.McFeeters@cms.hhs.gov.

Cancer Hospital Payments, contact Scott Talaga via email at
Scott.Talaga@cms.hhs.gov.

Cardiac Rehabilitation, Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Services, contact Nate Vercauteren via email at
Nathan.Vercauteren@cms.hhs.gov.

CMS Web Posting of the OPPS and ASC Payment Files, contact Chuck Braver via email at
Chuck.Braver@cms.hhs.gov.

Community Mental Health Centers (CMHC) Conditions of Participation, contact Mary Rossi-Coajou via email at
Mary.RossiCoajou@cms.hhs.gov
or Cara Meyer via email at
Cara.Meyer@cms.hhs.gov.

Composite APCs (Multiple Imaging and Mental Health), via email at Mitali Dayal via email at
Mitali.Dayal2@cms.hhs.gov.

Comprehensive APCs (C-APCs), contact Mitali Dayal via email at
Mitali.Dayal2@cms.hhs.gov.

COVID-19 Final Rules, contact Au'Sha Washington via email at
Ausha.Washington@cms.hhs.gov.

Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program policies, contact Kimberly Go via email
Kimberly.Go@cms.hhs.gov.

Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program measures, contact Janis Grady via email
Janis.Grady@cms.hhs.gov
.

Hospital Outpatient Visits (Emergency Department Visits and Critical Care Visits), contact Abby Cesnik via email at
Abigail.Cesnik@cms.hhs.gov.

Hospital Price Transparency (HPT), contact Terri Postma via email at
PriceTransparencyHospitalCharges@cms.hhs.gov.

Inpatient Only (IPO) Procedures List, contact Abigail Cesnik via email at
Abigail.Cesnik@cms.hhs.gov
.

Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Medicare Code Editor, contact Mady Hue via email at
Marilu.Hue@cms.hhs.gov.

Mental Health Services Furnished Remotely by Hospital Staff to Beneficiaries in Their Homes, contact Emily Yoder via email at
Emily.Yoder@cms.hhs.gov.

Method to Control Unnecessary Increases in the Volume of Clinic Visit

Services Furnished in Excepted Off-Campus Provider-Based Departments (PBDs), contact Nate Vercauteren via email at
Nathan.Vercauteren@cms.hhs.gov.

New Technology Intraocular Lenses (NTIOLs), contact Scott Talaga via email at
Scott.Talaga@cms.hhs.gov.

No Cost/Full Credit and Partial Credit Devices, contact Scott Talaga via email at
Scott.Talaga@cms.hhs.gov.

Opioid Treatment Program (OTP) Intensive Outpatient Services (IOP) contact Lindsey Baldwin via email at
Lindsey.Baldwin@cms.hhs.gov
and Ariana Pitcher at
Ariana.Pitcher@cms.hhs.gov.

OPPS Brachytherapy, contact Cory Duke via email at
Cory.Duke@cms.hhs.gov
and Scott Talaga via email at
Scott.Talaga@cms.hhs.gov.

OPPS Data (APC Weights, Conversion Factor, Copayments, Cost-to-Charge Ratios (CCRs), Data Claims, Geometric Mean Calculation, Outlier Payments, and Wage Index), contact Erick Chuang via email at
Erick.Chuang@cms.hhs.gov,
or Scott Talaga via email at
Scott.Talaga@cms.hhs.gov,
or Josh McFeeters via email at
Joshua.McFeeters@cms.hhs.gov.

OPPS Dental Policy, contact Nicole Marcos via email at
Nicole.Marcos@cms.hhs.gov.

OPPS Drugs, Radiopharmaceuticals, Biologicals, and Biosimilar Products, contact Josh McFeeters via email at
Joshua.McFeeters@cms.hhs.gov,
Gil Ngan via email at
Gil.Ngan@cms.hhs.gov,
Cory Duke via email at
Cory.Duke@cms.hhs.gov,
or Au'Sha Washington via email at
Ausha.Washington@cms.hhs.gov.

OPPS New Technology Procedures/Services, contact the New Technology APC mailbox at
NewTechAPCapplications@cms.hhs.gov.

OPPS Packaged Items/Services, contact Mitali Dayal via email at
Mitali.Dayal2@cms.hhs.gov
or Cory Duke via email at
Cory.Duke@cms.hhs.gov.

OPPS Pass-Through Devices, contact the Device Pass-Through mailbox at
DevicePTapplications@cms.hhs.gov.

OPPS Status Indicators (SI) and Comment Indicators (CI), contact Marina Kushnirova via email at
Marina.Kushnirova@cms.hhs.gov.

Partial Hospitalization Program (PHP), Intensive Outpatient (IOP), and Community Mental Health Center (CMHC) Issues, contact the PHP Payment Policy Mailbox at
PHPPaymentPolicy@cms.hhs.gov.

Request for Public Comments on Potential Payment under the IPPS for Establishing and Maintaining Access to Essential Medicines, contact
DAC@cms.hhs.gov
.

Rural Emergency Hospital Conditions of Participation, contact Kianna Banks via email
Kianna.Banks@cms.hhs.gov.

Rural Emergency Hospital Quality Reporting (REHQR) Program policies, contact Anita Bhatia via email at
Anita.Bhatia@cms.hhs.gov.

Rural Emergency Hospital Quality Reporting (REHQR) Program measures, contact Melissa Hager via email
Melissa.Hager@cms.hhs.gov.

Rural Health Clinic (RHC) and Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) Intensive Outpatient Services (IOP), contact the RHC Payment Policy Mailbox at
RHC@cms.hhs.gov
or the FQHC Payment Policy Mailbox at
FQHC-PPS@cms.hhs.gov.

Separate Payment for High-Cost Drugs Provided by Indian Health Service and Tribally-Owned Facilities, contact Josh McFeeters via email at
Joshua.McFeeters@cms.hhs.gov.

Skin Substitutes, contact Josh McFeeters via email at
Joshua.McFeeters@cms.hhs.gov.

All Other Issues Related to Hospital Outpatient Payments Not Previously Identified, contact the OPPS mailbox at
OutpatientPPS@cms.hhs.gov.

All Other Issues Related to the Ambulatory Surgical Center Payments Not Previously Identified, contact the ASC mailbox at
ASCPPS@cms.hhs.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Inspection of Public Comments:
All comments received before the close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public, including any personally identifiable or confidential business information that is included in a comment. We post all comments received before the close of the comment period on the following website as soon as possible after they have been received:
https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the search instructions on that website to view public comments. CMS will not post on
Regulations.gov
public comments that make threats to individuals or institutions or suggest that the individual will take actions to harm the individual. CMS continues to encourage individuals not to submit duplicative comments. We will post acceptable comments from multiple unique commenters even if the content is identical or nearly identical to other comments.

Addenda Available Only Through the Internet on the CMS Website

In the past, a majority of the Addenda referred to in our OPPS/ASC proposed and final rules were published in the
Federal Register
as part of the annual rulemakings. However, beginning with the calendar year (CY) 2012 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, all of the Addenda no longer appear in the
Federal Register
as part of the annual OPPS/ASC proposed and final rules to decrease administrative burden and reduce costs associated with publishing lengthy tables. Instead, these Addenda are published and available only on the CMS website. The Addenda relating to the OPPS are available at:
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/hospital-outpatient/regulations-notices.

The Addenda relating to the ASC payment system are available at:
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/ambulatory-surgical-center-asc/asc-regulations-and-notices.

Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Copyright Notice

Throughout this final rule with comment period, we use CPT codes and descriptions to refer to a variety of services. We note that CPT codes and descriptions are copyright 2021 American Medical Association (AMA). All Rights Reserved. CPT is a registered trademark of the AMA. Applicable Federal Acquisition Regulations and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations apply.

Table of Contents

I. Summary and Background

A. Executive Summary of This Document

B. Legislative and Regulatory Authority for the Hospital OPPS

C. Excluded OPPS Services and Hospitals

D. Prior Rulemaking

E. Advisory Panel on Hospital Outpatient Payment (the HOP Panel or the Panel)

F. Public Comments Received on the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC Proposed Rule

G. Public Comments Received on the CY 2023 OPPS/ASC Final Rule With Comment Period

II. Updates Affecting OPPS Payments

A. Recalibration of APC Relative Payment Weights

B. Conversion Factor Update

C. Proposed Wage Index Changes

D. Proposed Statewide Average Default Cost-to-Charge Ratios (CCRs)

E. Proposed Adjustment for Rural Sole Community Hospitals (SCHs) and Essential Access Community Hospitals (EACHs) Under Section 1833(t)(13)(B) of the Act for CY 2024

F. Proposed Payment Adjustment for Certain Cancer Hospitals for CY 2024

G. Proposed Hospital Outpatient Outlier Payments

H. Proposed Calculation of an Adjusted Medicare Payment From the National Unadjusted Medicare Payment

I. Proposed Beneficiary Copayments

B. Conversion Factor Update

C. Wage Index Changes

D. Statewide Average Default Cost-to-Charge Ratios (CCRs)

E. Adjustment for Rural Sole Community Hospitals (SCHs) and Essential Access Community Hospitals (EACHs) Under Section 1833(t)(13)(B) of the Act for CY 2024

F. Payment Adjustment for Certain Cancer Hospitals for CY 2024

G. Hospital Outpatient Outlier Payments

H. Calculation of an Adjusted Medicare Payment From the National Unadjusted Medicare Payment

I. Beneficiary Copayments

III. OPPS Ambulatory Payment Classification (APC) Group Policies

A. OPPS Treatment of New and Revised HCPCS Codes

B. OPPS Changes—Variations Within APCs

C. New Technology APCs

D. Universal Low Volume APC Policy for Clinical and Brachytherapy APCs

E. APC-Specific Policies

IV. OPPS Payment for Devices

A. Pass-Through Payment for Devices

B. Device-Intensive Procedures

V. OPPS Payment for Drugs, Biologicals, and Radiopharmaceuticals

A. OPPS Transitional Pass-Through Payment for Additional Costs of Drugs, Biologicals, and Radiopharmaceuticals

B. OPPS Payment for Drugs, Biologicals, and Radiopharmaceuticals Without Pass-Through Payment Status

C. Requirement in the Physician Fee Schedule CY 2024 Proposed Rule for HOPDs and ASCs To Report Discarded Amounts of Certain Single-Dose or Single-Use Package Drugs

VI. Estimate of OPPS Transitional Pass-Through Spending for Drugs, Biologicals, Radiopharmaceuticals, and Devices

A. Amount of Additional Payment and Limit on Aggregate Annual Adjustment

B. Estimate of Pass-Through Spending for CY 2024

VII. OPPS Payment for Hospital Outpatient Visits and Critical Care Services

VIII. Payment for Partial Hospitalization and Intensive Outpatient Services

A. Partial Hospitalization

B. Intensive Outpatient Program Services

C. Coding and Billing for PHP and IOP Services Under the OPPS

D. Payment Rate Methodology for PHP and IOP

E. Outlier Policy for CMHCs

F. Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) and Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

G. Modifications Related to Medicare Coverage for Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) Treatment Services Furnished by Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs)

H. Payment Rates Under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for Nonexcepted Items and Services Furnished by Nonexcepted Off-Campus Provider-Based Departments of a Hospital

IX. Services That Will Be Paid Only as Inpatient Services

A. Background

B. Changes to the Inpatient Only (IPO) List

C. Solicitation of Public Comments on the Services Described by CPT Codes 43775, 43644, 43645, and 44204

X. Nonrecurring Policy Changes

A. Supervision by Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistants, and Clinical Nurse Specialists of Cardiac Rehabilitation, Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Services Furnished to Hospital Outpatients

B. Payment for Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation Services (ICR) Provided by an Off-Campus, Non-Excepted Provider Based Department (PBD) of a Hospital

C. OPPS Payment for Specimen Collection for COVID-19 Tests

D. Remote Services

E. OPPS Payment for Dental Services

F. Use of Claims and Cost Report Data for CY 2024 OPPS and ASC Payment System Ratesetting Due to the PHE

G. Comment Solicitation on Payment for High-Cost Drugs Provided by Indian Health Service and Tribal Facilities

H. Technical Changes to Hospital Billing for Marriage and Family Therapist Services and Mental Health Counselor Services

XI. CY 2024 OPPS Payment Status and Comment Indicators

A. CY 2024 OPPS Payment Status Indicator Definitions

B. CY 2024 Comment Indicator Definitions

XII. MedPAC Recommendations

A. OPPS Payment Rates Update

B. Medicare Safety Net Index

C. ASC Cost Data

XIII. Updates to the Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) Payment System

A. Background, Legislative History, Statutory Authority, and Prior Rulemaking for the ASC Payment System

B. ASC Treatment of New and Revised Codes

C. Payment Policies Under the ASC Payment System

D. Additions to ASC Covered Surgical Procedures and Covered Ancillary Services Lists

E. ASC Payment Policy for Non-Opioid Post-Surgery Pain Management Drugs, Biologicals, and Devices

F. Comment Solicitation on Access to Non-Opioid Treatments for Pain Relief Under the OPPS and ASC Payment System

G. New Technology Intraocular Lenses (NTIOLs)

H. Calculation of the ASC Payment Rates and the ASC Conversion Factor

XIV. Requirements for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program

A. Background

B. Hospital OQR Program Quality Measures

C. Hospital OQR Program Quality Measure Topics for Potential Future Consideration

D. Administrative Requirements

E. Form, Manner, and Timing of Data Submitted for the Hospital OQR Program

F. Payment Reduction for Hospitals That Fail To Meet the Hospital OQR Program Requirements for the CY 2024 Payment Determination

XV. Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program Requirements

A. Background

B. ASCQR Program Quality Measures

C. Administrative Requirements

D. Form, Manner, and Timing of Data Submitted for the ASCQR Program

E. Payment Reduction for ASCs That Fail To Meet the ASCQR Program Requirements

XVI. Proposed Requirements for the Rural Emergency Hospital Quality Reporting (REHQR) Program

A. Background

B. REHQR Program Quality Measures

C. Administrative Requirements

D. Form, Manner, and Timing of Data Submitted for the REHQR Program

XVII. Changes to Community Mental Health Center (CMHC) Conditions of Participation (CoPs)

A. Background and Statutory Authority

B. Summary of the CMHC Proposed Provisions, Public Comments and Responses to Comments

XVIII. Updates to Requirements for Hospitals To Make Public a List of Their Standard Charges

A. Introduction and Overview

B. New Requirements for Making Public Hospital Standard Charges Under 45 CFR 180.50

C. Requirements To Improve and Enhance Enforcement

D. Comments on CMS' Request for Information Related to Consumer-Friendly Displays and Alignment With Transparency in Coverage and No Surprises Act

XIX. Changes to the Inpatient Prospective Payment System Medicare Code Editor

XX. Technical Edits for REH Conditions of Participation and Critical Access Hospital (CAH) CoP Updates

XXI. Rural Emergency Hospitals (REHs): Payment for Rural Emergency Hospitals (REHs)

A. Background on Rural Emergency Hospitals (REHs)

B. REH Payment Methodology

C. Background on the IHS Outpatient All-Inclusive Rate (AIR) for Tribal and IHS Hospitals

D. Paying Indian Health Service (IHS) and Tribal Hospitals That Convert to an REH Under the AIR

E. Exclusion of REHs From the OPPS

XXII. Request for Public Comments on Potential Payment Under the IPPS and OPPS for Establishing and Maintaining Access to Essential Medicines

A. Overview

B. Establishing and Maintaining a Buffer Stock of Essential Medicines

C. Potential Separate Payment Under IPPS and OPPS for Establishing and Maintaining Access to a Buffer Stock of Essential Medicines

D. Comment Solicitation on Additional Considerations

E. Overview of Comments Received

F. Next Steps

XXIII. Files Available to the Public via the Internet

XXIV. Collection of Information Requirements

A. ICRs Related to Proposed Intensive Outpatient Physician Certification Requirements

B. ICRs Related to the Hospital OQR Program

C. ICRs Related to the ASCQR Program

D. ICRs Related to the REHQR Program

E. ICRs Related to Conditions of Participation (CoPs): Admission, Initial Evaluation, Comprehensive Assessment, and Discharge or Transfer of the Client (§ 485.914)

F. ICR's Related to Conditions of Participation (CoPs): Treatment Team, Person-Centered Active Treatment Plan, and Coordination of Services (§ 485.916)

G. ICR's Related to Conditions of Participation (CoPs): Organization, Governance, Administration of Services, Partial Hospitalization Services (§ 485.918)

H. ICRs Related to Hospital Price Transparency

XXV. Response to Comments

XXVI. Economic Analyses

A. Statement of Need

B. Overall Impact of Provisions of This Final Rule With Comment Period

C. Detailed Economic Analyses

D. Regulatory Review Cost Estimation

E. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) Analysis

F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Analysis

G. Federalism

H. Conclusion

I. Congressional Review

I. Summary and Background

A. Executive Summary of This Document

1. Purpose

In this final rule with comment period, we are updating the payment policies and payment rates for services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries in hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) and ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs), beginning January 1, 2024. Section 1833(t) of the Social Security Act (the Act) requires us to annually review and update the payment rates for services payable under the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS). Specifically, section 1833(t)(9)(A) of the Act requires the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (the Secretary) to review certain components of the OPPS not less often than annually, and to revise the groups, the relative payment weights, and the wage and other adjustments that take into account changes in medical practice, changes in technology, and the addition of new services, new cost data, and other relevant information and factors. In addition, under section 1833(i)(D)(v) of the Act, we annually review and update the ASC payment rates. This final rule with comment period also includes additional policy changes made in accordance with our experience with the OPPS and the ASC payment system and recent changes in our statutory authority. We describe these and various other statutory authorities in the relevant sections of this final rule with comment period. In addition, this final rule with comment period updates and refines the requirements for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, the ASC Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program, and Rural Emergency Hospital Quality Reporting (REHQR) Program. In addition, this final rule with comment period establishes payment for intensive outpatient services under Medicare, beginning January 1, 2024. This final rule with comment period also updates and refines the requirements for hospitals to make public their standard charges and CMS enforcement of hospital price transparency regulations. In addition, we are finalizing changes to the CMHC CoPs to provide requirements for furnishing IOP services. In addition, we are finalizing changes to the CMHC CoPs to provide requirements for furnishing IOP services, as well as finalizing the proposed personnel qualifications for MHCs and MFTs. We are also finalizing the removal of discussion of the IPPS Medicare Code Editor (MCE) from the annual IPPS rulemakings, beginning with the FY 2025 rulemaking. Finally, we are finalizing a technical correction to the Rural Emergency Hospital (REH) CoPs under the standard for the designation and certification of REHs.

2. Summary of the Major Provisions

•
OPPS Update:
For 2024, we are increasing the payment rates under the OPPS by an Outpatient Department (OPD) fee schedule increase factor of 3.1 percent. This increase factor is based on the final inpatient hospital market basket percentage increase of 3.3 percent for inpatient services paid under the hospital inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) reduced by a final productivity adjustment of 0.2 percentage point. Based on this update, we estimate that total payments to OPPS providers (including beneficiary cost sharing and estimated changes in enrollment, utilization, and case mix) for calendar year (CY) 2024 will be approximately $88.9 billion, an increase of approximately $6.0 billion compared to estimated CY 2023 OPPS payments.

We are continuing to implement the statutory 2.0 percentage point reduction in payments for hospitals that fail to meet the hospital outpatient quality reporting requirements by applying a reporting factor of 0.9806 to the OPPS payments and copayments for all applicable services.

•
Data used in CY 2024 OPPS/ASC Ratesetting:
To set OPPS and ASC payment rates, we normally use the most updated claims and cost report data available. The best available claims data is the most recent set of data which would be from 2 years prior to the calendar year that is the subject of rulemaking. Cost report data usually lags the claims data by a year and we believe that using the most updated cost report extract available from the Healthcare Cost Report Information System (HCRIS) is appropriate for CY 2024 OPPS ratesetting. Therefore, we are using our typical data process of using the most updated cost reports and claims data available for CY 2024 OPPS ratesetting.

•
Partial Hospitalization Update:
For CY 2024, we are finalizing changes to our methodology used to calculate the Community Mental Health Center (CMHC) and hospital-based PHP (HB PHP) geometric mean per diem costs. We also are finalizing changes to expand PHP payment from two APCs to four APCs.

•
Medicare Payment for Intensive Outpatient Programs:
Beginning in CY 2024, we are finalizing payment for intensive outpatient program (IOP) services under Medicare. We are finalizing the scope of benefits, physician certification requirements, coding and billing, and payment rates under the IOP benefit. IOP services may be furnished in hospital outpatient departments, community mental health centers (CMHCs), federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), and rural health clinics (RHCs). We also are finalizing payment for intensive outpatient services provided by opioid treatment programs (OTPs) under the existing OTP benefit.

•
Changes to the Inpatient Only (IPO) List:
For 2024, we are finalizing our proposal to not remove any services from the IPO list for CY 2024.

• 340B
Acquired Drugs:
For CY 2024, we are continuing to apply the default rate, generally average sales price (ASP) plus 6 percent, to 340B acquired drugs and biologicals in this final rule with comment period. Therefore, drugs and biologicals acquired under the 340B program will be paid at the same payment rate as those drugs and biologicals not acquired under the 340B program.

•
Biosimilar Packaging Exception:
For CY 2024, we are finalizing our proposal to except biosimilars from the OPPS threshold packaging policy when their reference products are separately paid. However, we are not finalizing that all the biosimilars related to the reference product would be similarly

packaged if a reference product's per-day cost falls below the threshold packaging policy.

•
Finalizing to Pay IHS and Tribal Hospitals that Convert to a Rural Emergency Hospital (REH) Under the IHS All-Inclusive Rate (AIR):
For CY 2024, we are finalizing that IHS and tribal hospitals that convert to an REH be paid for hospital outpatient services under the same all-inclusive rate that would otherwise apply if these services were performed by an IHS or tribal hospital that is not an REH. We also are finalizing that IHS and tribal hospitals that convert to an REH would receive the REH monthly facility payment consistent with how this payment is applied to REHs that are not tribally or IHS operated.

•
Device Pass-Through Payment Applications:
For CY 2024, we received six applications for device pass-through payments. We sought public comment on these applications and are approving four applicants for device pass-through payment status in this final rule with comment period.

•
Cancer Hospital Payment Adjustment:
For CY 2024, we are continuing to provide additional payments to cancer hospitals so that a cancer hospital's payment-to-cost ratio (PCR) after the additional payments is equal to the weighted average PCR for the other OPPS hospitals using the most recently submitted or settled cost report data. Section 16002(b) of the 21st Century Cures Act requires that this weighted average PCR be reduced by 1.0 percentage point. In light of the public health emergency (PHE) impact on claims and cost data used to calculate the target PCR, we have maintained the CY 2021 target PCR of 0.89 through CYs 2022 and 2023. In this final rule with comment period, we are finalizing to reduce the target PCR by 1.0 percentage point each calendar year until the target PCR equals the PCR of non-cancer hospitals using the most recently submitted or settled cost report data. For CY 2024, we are finalizing a target PCR of 0.88 to determine the CY 2024 cancer hospital payment adjustment to be paid at cost report settlement. That is, the payment adjustments will be the additional payments needed to result in a PCR equal to 0.88 for each cancer hospital.

•
ASC Payment Update:
For CYs 2019 through 2023, we adopted a policy to update the ASC payment system using the hospital market basket update. In light of the impact of the COVID-19 PHE on healthcare utilization, we are finalizing to extend our policy to update the ASC payment system using the hospital market basket update an additional 2 years—through CYs 2024 and 2025. Using the hospital market basket methodology, for CY 2024, we are increasing payment rates under the ASC payment system by 3.1 percent for ASCs that meet the quality reporting requirements under the ASCQR Program. This increase is based on a hospital market basket percentage increase of 3.3 percent reduced by a productivity adjustment of 0.2 percentage point. Based on this final update, we estimate that total payments to ASCs (including beneficiary cost sharing and estimated changes in enrollment, utilization, and case-mix) for CY 2024 will be approximately $7.1 billion, an increase of approximately $207 million compared to estimated CY 2023 Medicare payments.

•
Changes to the List of ASC Covered Surgical Procedures:
For CY 2024, we are adding 37 surgical procedures, including total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) (Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) code 23472), to the ASC covered procedures list (CPL) based upon existing criteria at § 416.166.

•
Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program:
We are finalizing our proposals to: (1) modify the COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage Among Healthcare Personnel (HCP) measure beginning with the CY 2024 reporting period/CY 2026 payment determination; (2) modify the Cataracts: Improvement in Patient's Visual Function Within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery measure beginning with the voluntary CY 2024 reporting period; (3) modify the Appropriate Follow-Up Interval for Normal Colonoscopy in Average Risk Patients measure beginning with the CY 2024 reporting period/CY 2026 payment determination; and (4) amend multiple codified regulations to replace references to “QualityNet” with “CMS-designated information system” or “CMS website,” and to make other conforming technical edits, to accommodate recent and future systems requirements and mitigate confusion for program participants.

We are finalizing with modification the proposal to adopt the Risk-Standardized Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Performance Measure (PRO-PM) Following Elective Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and/or Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in the HOPD Setting (THA/TKA PRO-PM) with voluntary reporting beginning with the CY 2025 reporting period through the CY 2027 reporting period followed by mandatory reporting beginning one year later than proposed with the CY 2028 reporting period/CY 2031 payment determination.

We are finalizing with modification the proposal to adopt the Excessive Radiation Dose or Inadequate Image Quality for Diagnostic Computed Tomography (CT) in Adults (Hospital Level—Outpatient) measure with voluntary reporting beginning with the CY 2025 reporting period and mandatory reporting beginning 1 year later than proposed with the CY 2027 reporting period/CY 2029 payment determination.

We are not finalizing our proposal to remove the Left without Being Seen measure. We are also not finalizing our proposal to re-adopt with modification the Hospital Outpatient Volume Data on Selected Outpatient Procedures measure.

We also requested public comment on: (1) patient and workforce safety (including sepsis); (2) behavioral health (including suicide prevention); and (3) telehealth as potential future measurement topic areas in the Hospital OQR Program.

•
Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program:
We are finalizing our proposals to: (1) modify the COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage Among Health Care Personnel (HCP) measure beginning with the CY 2024 Reporting Period/CY 2026 payment determination; (2) modify the Cataracts: Improvement in Patient's Visual Function Within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery measure beginning with the voluntary CY 2024 reporting period; (3) modify the Endoscopy/Polyp Surveillance: Appropriate Follow-Up Interval for Normal Colonoscopy in Average Risk Patients measure beginning with the CY 2024 reporting period/CY 2026 payment determination; and (4) amend multiple codified regulations to replace references to “QualityNet” with “CMS-designated information system” or “CMS website,” and to make other conforming technical edits, to accommodate recent and future systems requirements and mitigate confusion for program participants.

We are finalizing with modification the proposal to adopt the Risk-Standardized Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Performance Measure (PRO-PM) Following Elective Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and/or Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in the ASC Setting (THA/TKA PRO-PM) with voluntary reporting beginning with the CY 2025 reporting period through the CY 2027 reporting period followed by mandatory reporting beginning 1 year later than proposed with the CY 2028 reporting period/CY 2031 payment determination.

We are not finalizing our proposal to re-adopt with modification the ASC Facility Volume Data on Selected ASC Surgical Procedures measure.

•
Rural Emergency Hospital Quality Reporting (REHQR) Program:
We are finalizing our proposals to: (1) codify the statutory authority for the REHQR Program; (2) adopt and codify policies related to measure retention and measure modification; (3) adopt one chart-abstracted measure, Median Time from Emergency Department (ED) Arrival to ED Departure for Discharged ED Patients, beginning with the CY 2024 reporting period; (4) adopt three claims-based measures, Abdomen Computed Tomography (CT)—Use of Contrast Material, Facility 7-Day Risk-Standardized Hospital Visit Rate After Outpatient Colonoscopy, and Risk-Standardized Hospital Visits Within 7 Days After Hospital Outpatient Surgery, beginning with the CY 2024 reporting period; (5) establish related reporting requirements beginning with the CY 2024 reporting period; (6) adopt and codify policies related to public reporting of data; (7) codify foundational requirements related to REHQR Program participation; (8) adopt and codify policies related to the form, manner, and timing of data submission under the REHQR Program; (9) adopt and codify a review and corrections period for submitted data; and (10) adopt and codify an Extraordinary Circumstances Exception (ECE) process for data submission requirements.

We are finalizing with modification the proposal to adopt and codify a policy related to immediate measure removal such that it is referred to more appropriately as immediate measure suspension. In such a case, a quality measure considered by CMS to have potential patient safety concerns will be immediately suspended from the program and then addressed in the next appropriate rulemaking cycle.

We also requested comment on the following potential measures and approaches for implementing quality reporting under the REHQR Program: (1) electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs); (2) care coordination measures; and (3) a tiered approach for quality measure reporting.

•
Mental Health Services Furnished Remotely by Hospital Staff to Beneficiaries in Their Homes:
For CY 2024, we are finalizing technical refinements to the existing coding for remote mental health services to allow for multiple units to be billed daily. We also are finalizing to create a new, untimed code to describe group psychotherapy. Finally, we are delaying the in-person visit requirements until January 1, 2025.

•
OPPS Payment for Dental Services:
For CY 2024, we are assigning over 240 HCPCS codes describing dental services to various clinical APCs to align with Medicare payment provisions regarding dental services adopted in the CY 2024 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) final rule (87 FR 69404; November 18, 2023).

•
Comment Solicitation on Payment for High-Cost Drugs Provided by Indian Health Service and Tribal Facilities:
We sought comment on whether Medicare should pay separately for high-cost drugs provided by IHS and tribal facilities. Commenters supported establishing a payment methodology that would allow IHS and Tribal healthcare facilities to receive separate payment outside of the IHS outpatient hospital all-inclusive rate (AIR) for oncology drugs and services whose costs exceed the AIR. Their preferred approach was to treat the AIR payment amount as a payment threshold and to have a separate payment for a drug if the cost of the drug was more than the AIR. Commenters also wanted CMS to ensure the integrity of the AIR if separate payment is established for high-cost oncology drugs and other high-cost services. We will consider these comments for future rulemaking.

•
Supervision by Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistants and Clinical Nurse Specialists of Cardiac, Intensive Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Services Furnished to Outpatients:
For CY 2024, to comply with section 51008 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 and to ensure consistency with final revisions to §§ 410.47 and 410.49 in the CY 2024 PFS final rule, published in the
Federal Register
of November 16, 2023 (FR Doc. 2023-24184), we are revising § 410.27(a)(1)(iv)(B)(
1
) to expand the practitioners who may supervise cardiac rehabilitation (CR), intensive cardiac rehabilitation (ICR), and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) services to include nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants (PAs), and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs). We also are allowing for the direct supervision requirement for CR, ICR, and PR to include virtual presence of the physician through audio-video real-time communications technology (excluding audio-only) through December 31, 2024, and extend this policy to the nonphysician practitioners, that is NPs, PAs, and CNSs, who are eligible to supervise these services in CY 2024.

•
Payment for Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation Services (ICR) Provided by an Off-Campus, Non-Excepted Provider Based Department (PBD) of a Hospital:
For CY 2024, to address an unintended reimbursement disparity created by application of the off-campus, non-excepted payment rate to intensive cardiac rehabilitation services (ICR), we are paying for ICR services furnished by an off-campus, non-excepted PBD of a hospital at 100 percent of the OPPS rate, which is the amount paid for these services under the PFS.

•
Final Updates to Requirements for Hospitals to Make Public a List of Their Standard Charges:
We are finalizing our proposals to revise several of our HPT requirements in order to improve our monitoring and enforcement capabilities by improving access to, and the usability of, hospital standard charge information; reducing the compliance burden on hospitals by providing CMS templates and technical guidance for display of hospital standard charge information; aligning, where feasible, certain HPT requirements and processes with requirements and processes we have implemented in the Transparency in Coverage (TIC) initiative; and making other modifications to our monitoring and enforcement capabilities that will, among other things, increase its transparency to the public. Together, we believe these activities will enhance existing and future enforcement actions while also providing the public with more meaningful standard charge information that can be used to improve the accuracy of consumer-friendly price estimator tools. Specifically, we are finalizing: (1) definitions of several terms; (2) a requirement that hospitals make a good faith effort to ensure standard charge information is true, accurate, and complete, and to include a statement affirming this in the machine-readable file (MRF); (3) new data elements that hospitals must include in their MRFs, as well a requirement that hospitals encode standard charge information in a CMS template layout; (4) phased implementation timeline applicable to the new requirements we are finalizing in this final rule with comment period; (5) a requirement that hospitals to include a .txt file in the root folder that includes a direct link to the MRF and a link in the footer on its website that links directly to the publicly available web page that hosts the link to the MRF; and (6) improvements to our enforcement process by updating our methods to assess hospital compliance, requiring hospitals to acknowledge receipt of warning notices, working with health system officials to address noncompliance issues in one or more hospitals that are part of a health system, and publicizing more

information about CMS enforcement activities related to individual hospital compliance. Specifically, and as discussed in more detail in section XVIII of this final rule with comment, we are finalizing that the effective date of the changes to the hospital price transparency regulations at 45 CFR part 180 will be January 1, 2024. However, the regulation text will specify later dates by which hospitals must be in compliance with some of these new requirements, and we will begin enforcing those requirements on those specified dates. We believe this phased implementation approach is necessary to provide hospitals time to collect and encode the required standard charge information completely and accurately.

•
Community Mental Health Center (CMHC) Conditions of Participation (CoPs):
The Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA), 2023 (Pub. L. 117-238) established in section 4124 coverage of intensive outpatient (IOP) services in CMHCs. The legislation extended Medicare coverage and payment of IOP services furnished by a CMHC beginning January 1, 2024, adding to the existing coverage and payment for partial hospitalization (PHP) services in CMHCs. Section 4121 of the CAA, 2023 also established a new Medicare benefit category for services furnished and directly billed by Mental Health Counselors (MHCs) and Marriage and Family Therapists (MFTs). To implement these provisions of section 4121 of the CAA, 2023, CMS is finalizing, as proposed, to modify the requirements for CMHCs to include IOP services throughout the CoPs. We are also finalizing our proposal to modify the CMHC CoPs for personnel qualifications to add a definition of marriage and family therapists and revise the current definition of mental health counselors. In addition, we are adding MFTs and MHCs to the list of practitioners who can lead interdisciplinary team meetings when deemed necessary.

•
Changes to the Inpatient Prospective Payment System Medicare Code Editor:
Consistent with the process that is used for updates to the Integrated Outpatient Code Editor (I/OCE) and other Medicare claims editing systems, we are finalizing our proposal to remove discussion of the IPPS Medicare Code Editor (MCE) from the annual IPPS rulemakings, beginning with the FY 2025 rulemaking, and to generally address future changes or updates to the MCE through instruction to the MACs.

• Request for Public Comments on Potential Payment under the IPPS and OPPS for Establishing and Maintaining Access to Essential Medicines:
We sought comment on potential separate payment under the IPPS for establishing and maintaining access to a buffer stock of essential medicines.

•
Rural Emergency Hospital (REH) Conditions of Participation (CoPs):
On November 23, 2022, we published a final rule for the REH health and safety standards, which was included in the “Medicare Program: Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems and Quality Reporting Programs; Organ Acquisition; Rural Emergency Hospitals: Payment Policies, Conditions of Participation, Provider Enrollment, Physician Self-Referral; New Service Category for Hospital Outpatient Department Prior Authorization Process; Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating; COVID-19” final rule with comment period (87 FR 71748). We are finalizing as proposed a technical correction to the REH CoPs under the standard for the designation and certification of REHs.

3. Summary of Costs and Benefits

In section XXVI of this final rule with comment period, we set forth a detailed analysis of the regulatory and federalism impacts that the changes will have on affected entities and beneficiaries. Key estimated impacts are described below.

a. Impacts of All OPPS Changes

Table 168 in section XXVI.C of this final rule with comment period displays the distributional impact of all the OPPS changes on various groups of hospitals and CMHCs for CY 2024 compared to all estimated OPPS payments in CY 2023. We estimate that the final policies in this final rule would result in a 3.2 percent overall increase in OPPS payments to providers. We estimate that total OPPS payments for CY 2024, including beneficiary cost-sharing, to the approximately 3,600 facilities paid under the OPPS (including general acute care hospitals, children's hospitals, cancer hospitals, and CMHCs) will increase by approximately $2.2 billion compared to CY 2023 payments, excluding our estimated changes in enrollment, utilization, and case-mix.

We estimated the isolated impact of our OPPS policies on CMHCs because CMHCs have historically only been paid for partial hospitalization services under the OPPS. Beginning in CY 2024, they will also be paid for new intensive outpatient program (IOP) services under the OPPS. Continuing the provider-specific structure we adopted beginning in CY 2011, and basing payment fully on the type of provider furnishing the service, we estimate a 9.2 percent increase in CY 2024 payments to CMHCs relative to their CY 2023 payments.

b. Impacts of the Updated Wage Indexes

We estimate that our update of the wage indexes based on the fiscal year (FY) 2024 IPPS final rule wage indexes will result in a 0.0 percent increase for urban hospitals under the OPPS and a 1.2 percent increase for rural hospitals. These wage indexes include the continued implementation of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) labor market area delineations based on 2010 Decennial Census data, with updates, as discussed in section II.C of this final rule with comment period.

c. Impacts of the Rural Adjustment and the Cancer Hospital Payment Adjustment

We are implementing the reduction to the cancer hospital payment adjustment for CY 2024 required by section 1833(t)(18)(C) of the Act, as added by section 16002(b) of the 21st Century Cures Act, and the final target payment-to-cost ratio (PCR) for CY 2024 cancer hospital adjustment of 0.89. However, as section 16002 requires that we reduce the target PCR by 0.01, that brings the final target PCR to 0.88 instead. This is 0.01 less than the target PCR of 0.89 from CY 2021 through CY 2023, which was previously held at the pre-PHE target.

d. Impacts of the OPD Fee Schedule Increase Factor

For the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC, we are establishing an OPD fee schedule increase factor of 3.1 percent and applying that increase factor to the conversion factor for CY 2024. As a result of the OPD fee schedule increase factor and other budget neutrality adjustments, we estimate that urban hospitals will experience an increase in payments of approximately 3.2 percent and that rural hospitals will experience an increase in payments of 4.2 percent. Classifying hospitals by teaching status, we estimate non-teaching hospitals will experience an increase in payments of 3.9 percent, minor teaching hospitals will experience an increase in payments of 3.5 percent, and major teaching hospitals will experience an increase in payments of 2.4 percent. We also classified hospitals by the type of ownership. We estimate that hospitals with voluntary ownership will experience an increase of 3.2 percent in payments, while hospitals with government ownership will experience an increase of 2.8 percent in payments. We estimate that hospitals with proprietary ownership will experience an increase of 4.6 percent in payments.

e. Impacts of the Final ASC Payment Update

For impact purposes, the surgical procedures on the ASC covered surgical procedure list are aggregated into surgical specialty groups using CPT and HCPCS code range definitions. The percentage change in estimated total payments by specialty groups under the CY 2024 payment rates, compared to estimated CY 2023 payment rates, generally ranges between a decrease of 11 percent and an increase of 8 percent, depending on the service, with some exceptions. We estimate the impact of applying the final inpatient hospital market basket update to ASC payment rates will increase payments by $207 million under the ASC payment system in CY 2024. We note that an increase based on the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) update would be 2.5 percent and would increase payments by $174 million under the ASC payment system in CY 2024. This increase would have been based on a projected CPI-U update of 2.9 percent minus a multifactor productivity adjustment required by the Affordable Care Act of 0.4 percentage point.

f. Impacts of Hospital Price Transparency

The policies we are finalizing to enhance automated access to hospital MRFs and aggregation and use of MRF data are estimated to increase burden on hospitals, including a one-time mean of $2,787 per hospital, and a total national cost of $19,784,539 ($2,787 × 7,098 hospitals). The cost estimate reflects estimated costs ranging from $1,274 and $4,181 per hospital, and a total national cost ranging from $9,040,620 to $29,676,809. As discussed in detail in section XXVI of this final rule with comment period, we believe that the benefits to the public (and to hospitals themselves) outweigh the burden imposed on hospitals.

B. Legislative and Regulatory Authority for the Hospital OPPS

When Title XVIII of the Act was enacted, Medicare payment for hospital outpatient services was based on hospital-specific costs. In an effort to ensure that Medicare and its beneficiaries pay appropriately for services and to encourage more efficient delivery of care, the Congress mandated replacement of the reasonable cost-based payment methodology with a prospective payment system (PPS). The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA) (Pub. L. 105-33) added section 1833(t) to the Act, authorizing implementation of a PPS for hospital outpatient services. The OPPS was first implemented for services furnished on or after August 1, 2000. Implementing regulations for the OPPS are located at 42 CFR parts 410 and 419.

The Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999 (BBRA) (Pub. L. 106-113) made major changes in the hospital OPPS. The following Acts made additional changes to the OPPS: the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits Improvement and Protection Act of 2000 (BIPA) (Pub. L. 106-554); the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) (Pub. L. 108-173); the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA) (Pub. L. 109-171), enacted on February 8, 2006; the Medicare Improvements and Extension Act under Division B of Title I of the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 (MIEA-TRHCA) (Pub. L. 109-432), enacted on December 20, 2006; the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (MMSEA) (Pub. L. 110-173), enacted on December 29, 2007; the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA) (Pub. L. 110-275), enacted on July 15, 2008; the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 111-148), enacted on March 23, 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-152), enacted on March 30, 2010 (these two public laws are collectively known as the Affordable Care Act); the Medicare and Medicaid Extenders Act of 2010 (MMEA, Pub. L. 111-309); the Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011 (TPTCCA, Pub. L. 112-78), enacted on December 23, 2011; the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (MCTRJCA, Pub. L. 112-96), enacted on February 22, 2012; the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-240), enacted January 2, 2013; the Pathway for SGR Reform Act of 2013 (Pub. L. 113-67) enacted on December 26, 2013; the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (PAMA, Pub. L. 113-93), enacted on March 27, 2014; the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015 (Pub. L. 114-10), enacted April 16, 2015; the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (Pub. L. 114-74), enacted November 2, 2015; the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (Pub. L. 114-113), enacted on December 18, 2015, the 21st Century Cures Act (Pub. L. 114-255), enacted on December 13, 2016; the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (Pub. L. 115-141), enacted on March 23, 2018; the Substance Use Disorder—Prevention that Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment for Patients and Communities Act (Pub. L. 115-271), enacted on October 24, 2018; the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (Pub. L. 116-94), enacted on December 20, 2019; the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (Pub. L. 116-136), enacted on March 27, 2020; the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (Pub. L. 116-260), enacted on December 27, 2020; the Inflation Reduction Act, 2022 (Pub. L. 117-169), enacted on August 16, 2022; and Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA), 2023 (Pub. L. 117-238), enacted December 29, 2022.

Under the OPPS, we generally pay for hospital Part B services on a rate-per-service basis that varies according to the APC group to which the service is assigned. We use the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) (which includes certain Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes) to identify and group the services within each APC. The OPPS includes payment for most hospital outpatient services, except those identified in section I.C of this final rule with comment period. Section 1833(t)(1)(B) of the Act provides for payment under the OPPS for hospital outpatient services designated by the Secretary (which includes partial hospitalization services furnished by CMHCs), and certain inpatient hospital services that are paid under Medicare Part B.

The OPPS rate is an unadjusted national payment amount that includes the Medicare payment and the beneficiary copayment. This rate is divided into a labor-related amount and a nonlabor-related amount. The labor-related amount is adjusted for area wage differences using the hospital inpatient wage index value for the locality in which the hospital or CMHC is located.

All services and items within an APC group are comparable clinically and with respect to resource use, as required by section 1833(t)(2)(B) of the Act. In accordance with section 1833(t)(2)(B) of the Act, subject to certain exceptions, items and services within an APC group cannot be considered comparable with respect to the use of resources if the highest median cost (or mean cost, if elected by the Secretary) for an item or service in the APC group is more than 2 times greater than the lowest median cost (or mean cost, if elected by the Secretary) for an item or service within the same APC group (referred to as the “2 times rule”). In implementing this provision, we generally use the cost of the item or service assigned to an APC group.

For new technology items and services, special payments under the OPPS may be made in one of two ways. Section 1833(t)(6) of the Act provides for temporary additional payments, which we refer to as “transitional pass-through payments,” for at least 2 but not more than 3 years for certain drugs, biological agents, brachytherapy devices used for the treatment of cancer, and categories of other medical devices. For new technology services that are not eligible for transitional pass-through payments, and for which we lack sufficient clinical information and cost data to appropriately assign them to a clinical APC group, we have established special APC groups based on costs, which we refer to as New Technology APCs. These New Technology APCs are designated by cost bands which allow us to provide appropriate and consistent payment for designated new procedures that are not yet reflected in our claims data. Similar to pass-through payments, an assignment to a New Technology APC is temporary; that is, we retain a service within a New Technology APC until we acquire sufficient data to assign it to a clinically appropriate APC group.

C. Excluded OPPS Services and Hospitals

Section 1833(t)(1)(B)(i) of the Act authorizes the Secretary to designate the hospital outpatient services that are paid under the OPPS. While most hospital outpatient services are payable under the OPPS, section 1833(t)(1)(B)(iv) of the Act excludes payment for ambulance, physical and occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology services, for which payment is made under a fee schedule. It also excludes screening mammography, diagnostic mammography, and effective January 1, 2011, an annual wellness visit providing personalized prevention plan services. The Secretary exercises the authority granted under the statute to also exclude from the OPPS certain services that are paid under fee schedules or other payment systems. Such excluded services include, for example, the professional services of physicians and nonphysician practitioners paid under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS); certain laboratory services paid under the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule (CLFS); services for beneficiaries with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) that are paid under the ESRD prospective payment system; and services and procedures that require an inpatient stay that are paid under the hospital IPPS. In addition, section 1833(t)(1)(B)(v) of the Act does not include applicable items and services (as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (21)) that are furnished on or after January 1, 2017, by an off-campus outpatient department of a provider (as defined in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (21)). We set forth the services that are excluded from payment under the OPPS in regulations at 42 CFR 419.22.

Under § 419.20(b) of the regulations, we specify the types of hospitals that are excluded from payment under the OPPS. These excluded hospitals are:

• Critical access hospitals (CAHs);

• Hospitals located in Maryland and paid under Maryland's All-Payer or Total Cost of Care Model;

• Hospitals located outside of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico; and

• Indian Health Service (IHS) hospitals.

D. Prior Rulemaking

On April 7, 2000, we published in the
Federal Register
a final rule with comment period (65 FR 18434) to implement a prospective payment system for hospital outpatient services. The hospital OPPS was first implemented for services furnished on or after August 1, 2000. Section 1833(t)(9)(A) of the Act requires the Secretary to review certain components of the OPPS, not less often than annually, and to revise the groups, the relative payment weights, and the wage and other adjustments to take into account changes in medical practices, changes in technology, the addition of new services, new cost data, and other relevant information and factors.

Since initially implementing the OPPS, we have published final rules in the
Federal Register
annually to implement statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with this system. These rules can be viewed on the CMS website at:
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/hospital-outpatient/regulations-notices.

E. Advisory Panel on Hospital Outpatient Payment (the HOP Panel or the Panel)

1. Authority of the Panel

Section 1833(t)(9)(A) of the Act, as amended by section 201(h) of Public Law 106-113, and redesignated by section 202(a)(2) of Public Law 106-113, requires that we consult with an expert outside advisory panel composed of an appropriate selection of representatives of providers to annually review (and advise the Secretary concerning) the clinical integrity of the payment groups and their weights under the OPPS. In CY 2000, based on section 1833(t)(9)(A) of the Act, the Secretary established the Advisory Panel on Ambulatory Payment Classification Groups (APC Panel) to fulfill this requirement. In CY 2011, based on section 222 of the Public Health Service Act (the PHS Act), which gives discretionary authority to the Secretary to convene advisory councils and committees, the Secretary expanded the panel's scope to include the supervision of hospital outpatient therapeutic services in addition to the APC groups and weights. To reflect this new role of the panel, the Secretary changed the panel's name to the Advisory Panel on Hospital Outpatient Payment (the HOP Panel). The HOP Panel is not restricted to using data compiled by CMS, and in conducting its review, it may use data collected or developed by organizations outside the Department.

2. Establishment of the Panel

On November 21, 2000, the Secretary signed the initial charter establishing the Panel, and, at that time, named the APC Panel. This expert panel is composed of appropriate representatives of providers (currently employed full-time, not as consultants, in their respective areas of expertise) who review clinical data and advise CMS about the clinical integrity of the APC groups and their payment weights. Since CY 2012, the Panel also is charged with advising the Secretary on the appropriate level of supervision for individual hospital outpatient therapeutic services. The Panel is technical in nature, and it is governed by the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). The current charter specifies, among other requirements, that the Panel—

• May advise on the clinical integrity of Ambulatory Payment Classification (APC) groups and their associated weights;

• May advise on the appropriate supervision level for hospital outpatient services;

• May advise on OPPS APC rates for ASC covered surgical procedures;

• Continues to be technical in nature;

• Is governed by the provisions of the FACA;

• Has a Designated Federal Official (DFO); and

• Is chaired by a Federal Official designated by the Secretary.

The Panel's charter was amended on November 15, 2011, renaming the Panel and expanding the Panel's authority to include supervision of hospital outpatient therapeutic services and to add critical access hospital (CAH) representation to its membership. The

Panel's charter was also amended on November 6, 2014 (80 FR 23009), and the number of members was revised from up to 19 to up to 15 members. The Panel's current charter was approved on November 21, 2022, for a 2-year period.

The current Panel membership and other information pertaining to the Panel, including its charter,
Federal Register
notices, membership, meeting dates, agenda topics, and meeting reports, can be viewed on the CMS website at:
https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/FACA/AdvisoryPanelonAmbulatoryPaymentClassificationGroups.html.

3. Panel Meetings and Organizational Structure

The Panel has held many meetings, with the last meeting taking place on August 21, 2023. Prior to each meeting, we publish a notice in the
Federal Register
to announce the meeting, new members, and any other changes of which the public should be aware. Beginning in CY 2017, we have transitioned to one meeting per year (81 FR 31941). In CY 2018, we published a
Federal Register
notice requesting nominations to fill vacancies on the Panel (83 FR 3715). CMS is currently accepting nominations at:
https://mearis.cms.gov.

In addition, the Panel has established an administrative structure that, in part, currently includes the use of three subcommittee workgroups to provide preparatory meeting and subject support to the larger panel. The three current subcommittees include the following:

• APC Groups and Status Indicator Assignments Subcommittee, which advises and provides recommendations to the Panel on the appropriate status indicators to be assigned to HCPCS codes, including but not limited to whether a HCPCS code or a category of codes should be packaged or separately paid, as well as the appropriate APC assignment of HCPCS codes regarding services for which separate payment is made;

• Data Subcommittee, which is responsible for studying the data issues confronting the Panel and for recommending options for resolving them; and

• Visits and Observation Subcommittee, which reviews and makes recommendations to the Panel on all technical issues pertaining to observation services and hospital outpatient visits paid under the OPPS.

Each of these workgroup subcommittees was established by a majority vote from the full Panel during a scheduled Panel meeting, and the Panel recommended at the August 21, 2023, meeting that the subcommittees continue. We accepted this recommendation.

For discussions of earlier Panel meetings and recommendations, we refer readers to previously published OPPS/ASC proposed and final rules, the CMS website mentioned earlier in this section, and the FACA database at
https://facadatabase.gov.

F. Public Comments Received on the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC Proposed Rule

We received approximately 3,777 timely pieces of correspondence on the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC proposed rule that appeared in the
Federal Register
on July 31, 2023 (88 FR 49552 through 49921), from individuals, elected officials, providers and suppliers, practitioners, manufacturers and advocacy groups. We provide summaries of the public comments, and our responses are set forth in the various sections of this final rule with comment period under the appropriate headings. We note that we received some public comments that were outside the scope of the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC proposed rule. Out-of-scope-public comments are not addressed in this CY 2024 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period.

G. Public Comments Received on the CY 2023 OPPS/ASC Final Rule With Comment Period

We received approximately 12 timely pieces of correspondence on the CY 2023 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period that appeared in the
Federal Register
on November 23, 2022 (87 FR 71748).

II. Updates Affecting OPPS Payments

A. Recalibration of APC Relative Payment Weights

1. Database Construction

a. Database Source and Methodology

Section 1833(t)(9)(A) of the Act requires that the Secretary review not less often than annually and revise the relative payment weights for Ambulatory Payment Classifications (APCs). In the April 7, 2000, OPPS final rule with comment period (65 FR 18482), we explained in detail how we calculated the relative payment weights that were implemented on August 1, 2000, for each APC group.

For the CY 2024 OPPS, we proposed to recalibrate the APC relative payment weights for services furnished on or after January 1, 2024, and before January 1, 2025 (CY 2024), using the same basic methodology that we described in the CY 2023 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (86 FR 63466), using CY 2022 claims data. That is, we proposed to recalibrate the relative payment weights for each APC based on claims and cost report data for hospital outpatient department (HOPD) services to construct a database for calculating APC group weights.

For the purpose of recalibrating the proposed APC relative payment weights for CY 2024, we began with approximately 180 million final action claims (claims for which all disputes and adjustments have been resolved and payment has been made) for HOPD services furnished on or after January 1, 2022, and before January 1, 2023, before applying our exclusionary criteria and other methodological adjustments. After the application of those data processing changes, we used approximately 93 million final action claims to develop the proposed CY 2024 OPPS payment weights. For exact numbers of claims used and additional details on the claims accounting process, we refer readers to the claims accounting narrative under supporting documentation for the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC proposed rule on the CMS website at:
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/hospital-outpatient.

Addendum N to the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (which is available via the internet on the CMS website at:
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/hospital-outpatient/regulations-notices
) included the proposed list of bypass codes for CY 2024. The proposed list of bypass codes contains codes that are reported on claims for services in CY 2022 and, therefore, includes codes that were in effect in CY 2022 and used for billing. We retained these deleted bypass codes on the proposed CY 2024 bypass list because these codes existed in CY 2022 and were covered OPD services in that period, and CY 2022 claims data were used to calculate proposed CY 2024 payment rates. Keeping these deleted bypass codes on the bypass list potentially allows us to create more “pseudo” single procedure claims for ratesetting purposes. “Overlap bypass codes” that are members of the proposed multiple imaging composite APCs are identified by asterisks (*) in the third column of Addendum N to the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC proposed rule. HCPCS codes that we proposed to add for CY 2024 are identified by asterisks (*) in the fourth column of Addendum N.

We did not receive any public comments on our general proposal to recalibrate the relative payment weights for each APC based on claims and cost report data for HOPD services or on our

proposed bypass code process. We are finalizing as proposed the “pseudo” single claims process and the final CY 2024 list of bypass codes, as displayed in Addendum N to this final rule with comment period (which is available via the internet on the CMS website). For this final rule with comment period, for the purpose of recalibrating the final APC relative payment weights for CY 2024, we used approximately 103 million final actions claims (claims for which all disputes and adjustments have been resolved and payment has been made) for HOPD services furnished on or after January 1, 2022, and before January 1, 2023. For exact numbers of claims used and additional details on the claims accounting process, we refer readers to the claims accounting narrative under supporting documentation for this final rule with comment period on the CMS website at:
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/hospital-outpatient.

b. Calculation and Use of Cost-to-Charge Ratios (CCRs)

For CY 2024, we proposed to continue to use the hospital-specific overall ancillary and departmental cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs) to convert charges to estimated costs through application of a revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk. To calculate the APC costs on which the proposed CY 2024 APC payment rates are based, we calculated hospital-specific departmental CCRs for each hospital for which we had CY 2022 claims data by comparing these claims data to the most recently available hospital cost reports, which, in most cases, are from CY 2021. For the proposed CY 2024 OPPS payment rates, we used the set of claims processed during CY 2022. We applied the hospital-specific CCR to the hospital's charges at the most detailed level possible, based on a revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk that contains a hierarchy of CCRs used to estimate costs from charges for each revenue code. To ensure the completeness of the revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk, we reviewed changes to the list of revenue codes for CY 2022 (the year of claims data we used to calculate the proposed CY 2024 OPPS payment rates) and updates to the National Uniform Billing Committee (NUBC) 2022 Data specifications Manual. That crosswalk is available for review and continuous comment on the CMS website at
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/hospital-outpatient.

In the CY 2023 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period, a few commenters recommended that we revise our revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk to provide consistency with the NUBC definitions and to improve the accuracy of cost data for OPPS ratesetting with respect to chimeric antigen receptor therapy (CAR-T) administration services (87 FR 71758). In that final rule with comment period, we stated that we intend to explore the implications of this recommendation further and may consider such changes in future rulemaking. In the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, we explored the impacts of the commenters' recommendation from the CY 2023 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period that we assign primary cost centers to certain CAR-T-related revenue codes that were not previously assigned cost centers. Specifically, in the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, we explored the commenter's recommendations regarding changes to the revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk, which included:

• Revising revenue codes 0870 (Cell/Gene Therapy General Classification) and 0871 (Cell Collection) to be mapped to a primary cost center of 9000 (Clinic);

• Revising revenue codes 0872 (Specialized Biologic Processing and Storage—Prior to Transport) and 0873 (Storage and Processing After Receipt of Cells from Manufacturer) to be mapped to a primary cost center of 3350 (Hematology);

• Revising revenue codes 0874 (Infusion of Modified Cells) and 0875 (Injection of Modified Cells) to be mapped to a primary cost center of 6400 (Intravenous Therapy); and

• Revising revenue codes 0891 (Special Processed Drugs—FDA Approved Cell Therapy) and 0892 (Special Processed Drugs—FDA Approved Gene Therapy) to be mapped to a primary cost center of 7300 (Drugs Charged to Patients).

After reviewing the impact of these crosswalk revisions on our proposed CY 2024 OPPS APC geometric mean costs, we only observed an increase in the geometric mean cost of CPT code 0540T (Chimeric antigen receptor t-cell (car-t) therapy; car-t cell administration, autologous)—from $148.31 to $294.17 for the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC proposed rule—as a result of the revenue code for CPT code 0540T being assigned to a new cost center and the new corresponding cost-to-charge ratio. We did not observe any significant impact on APC geometric mean costs or payment as a result of these revisions. We stated that we believe these revisions would provide greater consistency with the NUBC definitions (which already adopted these revenue code revisions) and more accurately account for the costs of CAR-T administration services under the OPPS. Therefore, for CY 2024 and subsequent years, we proposed to adopt the aforementioned revisions to revenue codes 0870, 0871 0872, 0873, 0874, 0875, 0891, and 0892 in our revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk.

We solicited comment on our proposed changes to the revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk for CY 2024.

In accordance with our longstanding policy, similar to our finalized policy for CY 2023 OPPS ratesetting, we proposed to calculate CCRs for the standard cost centers—cost centers with a predefined label—and nonstandard cost centers—cost centers defined by a hospital—accepted by the electronic cost report database. In general, the most detailed level at which we calculate CCRs is the hospital-specific departmental level.

While we generally view the use of additional cost data as improving our OPPS ratesetting process, we have historically not included cost report lines for certain nonstandard cost centers in the OPPS ratesetting database construction when hospitals have reported these nonstandard cost centers on cost report lines that do not correspond to the cost center number. We believe it is important to further investigate the accuracy of these cost report data before including such data in the ratesetting process. Further, we believe it is appropriate to gather additional information from the public as well before including them in OPPS ratesetting. For CY 2024, we proposed not to include the nonstandard cost centers reported in this way in the OPPS ratesetting database construction.

Comment:
Two commenters supported our proposed revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk changes associated with CAR-T.

Response:
We appreciate the commenters' support for our proposal.

Comment:
A few commenters listed a number of concerns regarding the revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk mappings associated with revenue codes 0815 and 0819. They noted that the 2552-96 revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk does not show the cost center used for ratesetting. They also noted that the current 2552-10 revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk includes a primary cost center mapping to 112.50 and no secondary or tertiary cost centers listed.

A commenter requested more detail around the cost reporting and billing patterns related to revenue codes 0815 and cost centers 112.50 and 7700. A commenter believed that the mapping

for revenue code 0819 to cost center 8600 was incongruent with CMS instructions for cost reporting periods after 2017 to no longer include donor costs in cost center 8600. They believed that this mapping should not apply.

Commenters stated that cost center 7700 represented a logical alternative mapping for revenue code 0815 but noted that it did not represent all donor search and cell acquisition costs because those costs were only recently calculated through Worksheet D-6 of the Medicare cost report and that data would not be available for ratesetting for several years. They also suggested that CMS review the use of the hospital overall ancillary CCR until more accurate information could be obtained in both cost center 7700 and Worksheet D-6. A commenter also requested that CMS ensure that the Worksheet D-6 is available for all cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2020.

Response:
As discussed in this section and briefly in the claims accounting narrative available online, the revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk is a hierarchy that attempts to apply departmental cost center CCRs to estimate costs from charges. Where no specific CCR is available, the provider's overall ancillary CCR will be applied. There may be significant differences in the cost reports used in our ratesetting process, based on providers' charging structures as well as cost reporting periods. As a result, the revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk is designed to accommodate that flexibility by selecting what we believe to be the most accurate CCRs available.

The Medicare cost report form 2552-10 was implemented for cost reporting periods on or after May 1, 2010. Providers have familiarity with cost reporting using this form. While there may be a range in the cost reporting periods available, all cost report data used in ratesetting for the CY 2024 OPPS final rule with comment period are based on the Medicare cost report form 2552-10. The 2552-96 crosswalk is largely provided for historical reference purposes and not because it is actively used in our ratesetting process. However, we can consider removing those worksheets from the form if they no longer serve a purpose for hospitals.

With regard to the primary mapping of revenue code 0815 to cost center 112.50 (Stem Cell Acquisition) indicated in the display version of the revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk, the cost center was inadvertently listed as a primary mapping. The primary and sole mapping for revenue code 0815 in our current ratesetting process is to cost center 7700 (Allogeneic Stem Cell Acquisition). In cases where that cost center CCR is not available in a provider's cost report but services are billed using revenue code 0815, the overall ancillary CCR would instead be applied to reduce charges to estimated cost. We note that there are no cost reports we are including in the CY 2024 OPPS ratesetting process that report cost and charges under 112.50, and there are no revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk mappings to that cost center.

As discussed earlier, the cost reports used in OPPS ratesetting can have varying cost reporting periods and varying cost reporting structures. Therefore, the cost center CCR mappings included in the revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk are designed to accommodate this variability. For revenue code 0815 (Allogeneic Stem Cell Acquisition Services), most of the providers billing using this revenue code are also cost reporting with cost center 7700. Within our ratesetting process, the CCRs for cost center 7700 are significantly higher than those for the overall ancillary CCR; and we continue to believe that the preference should be to use the cost center 7700 CCR unless it is not otherwise available. We note that billing using revenue code 0819 (Organ Acquisition: Other donor) is extremely limited, with only a single line observed within our data. We believe that having the flexibility to use its cost center 8600 mapping where this revenue code is billed is more reflective than the overall ancillary CCR. However, we will monitor the data to determine if this cost center CCR mapping continues to remain appropriate in the future.

While we do not have any specific changes at this time associated with the data from Worksheet D-6 of the Medicare cost report form, we will review the data as they become available. Based on that review, we will consider inclusion of that data and integration into the cost estimation process, if appropriate. We appreciate commenter input as we consider possible changes in the OPPS ratesetting process we use to estimate service costs. We also note that the cost reporting software has already been updated to allow for submission of data regarding these acquisition costs for cost reporting periods on or after October 1, 2020.

After consideration of the public comments we received, we are finalizing the proposed crosswalk, including the proposed changes associated with CAR-T. In addition, we are making the change to our display copy of the revenue code-to-cost center crosswalk to assign cost center 77 as the primary cost center CCR mapping for revenue code 0815.

2. Final Data Development and Calculation of Costs Used for Ratesetting

In this section of this final rule with comment period, we discuss the use of claims to calculate the OPPS payment rates for CY 2024. The Hospital OPPS page on the CMS website on which this final rule with comment period is posted (
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/hospital-outpatient
) provides an accounting of claims used in the development of the final payment rates. That accounting provides additional detail regarding the number of claims derived at each stage of the process. In addition, later in this section we discuss the file of claims that comprises the data set that is available upon payment of an administrative fee under a CMS data use agreement. The CMS website,
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/hospital-outpatient,
includes information about obtaining the “OPPS Limited Data Set,” which now includes the additional variables previously available only in the OPPS Identifiable Data Set, including International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis codes and revenue code payment amounts. This file is derived from the CY 2022 claims that are used to calculate the final payment rates for this final rule with comment period.

Previously, the OPPS established the scaled relative weights on which payments are based using APC median costs, a process described in the CY 2012 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (76 FR 74188). However, as discussed in more detail in section II.A.2.f of the CY 2013 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (77 FR 68259 through 68271), we finalized the use of geometric mean costs to calculate the relative weights on which the CY 2013 OPPS payment rates were based. While this policy changed the cost metric on which the relative payments are based, the data process in general remained the same under the methodologies that we used to obtain appropriate claims data and accurate cost information in determining estimated service cost.

We used the methodology described in sections II.A.2.a through II.A.2.c of this final rule with comment period to calculate the costs we used to establish the final relative payment weights used in calculating the OPPS payment rates for CY 2024 shown in Addenda A and B to this final rule with comment period (which are available via the internet on

the CMS website at:
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/hospital-outpatient/regulations-notices
). We refer readers to section II.A.4 of this final rule with comment period for a discussion of the conversion of APC costs to scaled payment weights.

We note that under the OPPS, CY 2019 was the first year in which the claims data used for setting payment rates (CY 2017 data) contained lines with the modifier “PN,” which indicates nonexcepted items and services furnished and billed by off-campus provider-based departments (PBDs) of hospitals. Because nonexcepted items and services are not paid under the OPPS, in the CY 2019 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (83 FR 58832), we finalized a policy to remove those claim lines reported with modifier “PN” from the claims data used in ratesetting for the CY 2019 OPPS and subsequent years. For the CY 2024 OPPS, we proposed to continue to remove claim lines with modifier “PN” from the ratesetting process.

For details of the claims accounting process used in final rule with comment period, we refer readers to the claims accounting narrative under supporting documentation for this final rule with comment period on the CMS website at:
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/hospital-outpatient.

We did not receive any public comments on our proposal and are finalizing our proposal to continue to remove claim lines reported with modifier “PN” from the ratesetting process.

a. Calculation of Single Procedure APC Criteria-Based Costs

(1) Blood and Blood Products

Since the implementation of the OPPS in August 2000, we have made separate payments for blood and blood products through APCs rather than packaging payment for them into payments for the procedures with which they are administered. Hospital payments for the costs of blood and blood products, as well as for the costs of collecting, processing, and storing blood and blood products, are made through the OPPS payments for specific blood product APCs.

In the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, we proposed to continue to establish payment rates for blood and blood products using our blood-specific CCR methodology (88 FR 49562), which utilizes actual or simulated CCRs from the most recently available hospital cost reports to convert hospital charges for blood and blood products to costs. This methodology has been our standard ratesetting methodology for blood and blood products since CY 2005. It was developed in response to data analysis indicating that there was a significant difference in CCRs for those hospitals with and without blood-specific cost centers and past public comments indicating that the former OPPS policy of defaulting to the overall hospital CCR for hospitals not reporting a blood-specific cost center often resulted in an underestimation of the true hospital costs for blood and blood products. To address the differences in CCRs and to better reflect hospitals' costs, our methodology simulates blood CCRs for each hospital that does not report a blood cost center by calculating the ratio of the blood-specific CCRs to hospitals' overall CCRs for those hospitals that do report costs and charges for blood cost centers and applies this mean ratio to the overall CCRs of hospitals not reporting costs and charges for blood cost centers on their cost reports. We proposed to calculate the costs upon which the proposed payment rates for blood and blood products are based using the actual blood-specific CCR for hospitals that reported costs and charges for a blood cost center and a hospital-specific, simulated, blood-specific CCR for hospitals that did not report costs and charges for a blood cost center.

We continue to believe that the hospital-specific, simulated, blood-specific CCR methodology takes into account the unique charging and cost accounting structure of each hospital, it better responds to the absence of a blood-specific CCR for a hospital than alternative methodologies, such as defaulting to the overall hospital CCR or applying an average blood-specific CCR across hospitals. This methodology also yields more accurate estimated costs for these products and results in payment rates for blood and blood products that appropriately reflect the relative estimated costs of these products for hospitals without blood cost centers and for these blood products in general.

We refer readers to Addendum B to this final rule with comment period (which is available via the internet on the CMS website at
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/hospital-outpatient/regulations-notices
) for the final CY 2024 payment rates for blood and blood products (which are generally identified with status indicator “R”).

For a more detailed discussion of payments for blood and blood products through APCs, we refer readers to:

• the CY 2005 OPPS proposed rule (69 FR 50524 and 50525) for a more comprehensive discussion of the blood-specific CCR methodology;

• the CY 2008 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (72 FR 66807 through 66810) for a detailed history of the OPPS payment for blood and blood products; and

• the CY 2015 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (79 FR 66795 and 66796) for additional discussion of our policy not to make separate payments for blood and blood products when they appear on the same claims as services assigned to a C-APC.

Comment:
Two commenters discussed our payment policies for blood and blood products. One commenter expressed concerns about lower payment rates for some blood products in CY 2024 as compared to CY 2023 and encouraged CMS to work with interested parties in the blood products and blood services community to address this issue. The other commenter expressed their support for separate payment for blood and blood products in the OPPS for most services.

Response:
We appreciate the input from the commenters, and we will keep these issues in mind in future rulemaking.

After consideration of the public comments we received, we are adopting as final our proposals for blood and blood products using our blood-specific CCR methodology without modification. Refer to Addendum B to this final rule with comment period (which is available via the internet on the CMS website) for the final CY 2024 payment rates for blood and blood products.

(2) Brachytherapy Sources

Section 1833(t)(2)(H) of the Act mandates the creation of additional groups of covered OPD services that classify devices of brachytherapy—cancer treatment through solid source radioactive implants—consisting of a seed or seeds (or radioactive source) (“brachytherapy sources”) separately from other services or groups of services. The statute provides certain criteria for the additional groups. For the history of OPPS payment for brachytherapy sources, we refer readers to prior OPPS final rules, such as the CY 2012 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (77 FR 68240 and 68241). As we have stated in prior OPPS updates, we believe that adopting the general OPPS prospective payment methodology for brachytherapy sources is appropriate for a number of reasons (77 FR 68240). The general OPPS methodology uses costs based on claims data to set the relative payment weights

for hospital outpatient services. This payment methodology results in more consistent, predictable, and equitable payment amounts per source across hospitals by averaging the extremely high and low values, in contrast to payment based on hospitals' charges adjusted to costs. We believe that the OPPS methodology, as opposed to payment based on hospitals' charges adjusted to cost, also would provide hospitals with incentives for efficiency in the provision of brachytherapy services to Medicare beneficiaries. Moreover, this approach is consistent with our payment methodology for the vast majority of items and services paid under the OPPS. We refer readers to the CY 2016 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (80 FR 70323 through 70325) for further discussion of the history of OPPS payment for brachytherapy sources.

For CY 2024, except where otherwise indicated, we proposed to use the costs derived from CY 2022 claims data to set the proposed CY 2024 payment rates for brachytherapy sources because CY 2022 is the year of data we proposed to use to set the proposed payment rates for most other items and services that would be paid under the CY 2024 OPPS. We proposed this methodology for CY 2024 and subsequent years. With the exception of the proposed payment rate for brachytherapy source C2645 (Brachytherapy planar source, palladium-103, per square millimeter) and the proposed payment rates for low-volume brachytherapy APCs discussed in section III.D of the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (88 FR 49563), we proposed to base the payment rates for brachytherapy sources on the geometric mean unit costs for each source, consistent with the methodology that we proposed for other items and services paid under the OPPS, as discussed in section II.A.2 of the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (88 FR 49563). We also proposed for CY 2024 and subsequent years to continue the other payment policies for brachytherapy sources that we finalized and first implemented in the CY 2010 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (74 FR 60537). For CY 2024 and subsequent years, we proposed to pay for the stranded and nonstranded not otherwise specified (NOS) codes, HCPCS codes C2698 (Brachytherapy source, stranded, not otherwise specified, per source) and C2699 (Brachytherapy source, non-stranded, not otherwise specified, per source), at a rate equal to the lowest stranded or nonstranded prospective payment rate for such sources, respectively, on a per-source basis (as opposed to, for example, per mCi), which is based on the policy we established in the CY 2008 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (72 FR 66785). For CY 2024 and subsequent years, we also proposed to continue the policy we first implemented in the CY 2010 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (74 FR 60537) regarding payment for new brachytherapy sources for which we have no claims data, based on the same reasons we discussed in the CY 2008 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (72 FR 66786; which was delayed until January 1, 2010, by section 142 of Pub. L. 110-275). Specifically, this policy is intended to enable us to assign new HCPCS codes for new brachytherapy sources to their own APCs, with prospective payment rates set based on our consideration of external data and other relevant information regarding the expected costs of the sources to hospitals. The proposed CY 2024 payment rates for brachytherapy sources are included on Addendum B to the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (which is available via the internet on the CMS website) and identified with status indicator “U.”

For CY 2018, we assigned status indicator “U” (Brachytherapy Sources, Paid under OPPS; separate APC payment) to HCPCS code C2645 (Brachytherapy planar source, palladium-103, per square millimeter) in the absence of claims data and established a payment rate using external data (invoice price) at $4.69 per mm
2
for the brachytherapy source's APC—APC 2648 (Brachytx planar, p-103). For CY 2019, in the absence of sufficient claims data, we continued to establish a payment rate for C2645 at $4.69 per mm
2
for APC 2648 (Brachytx planar, p-103). Our CY 2018 claims data available for the CY 2020 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (84 FR 61142) included two claims with a geometric mean cost for HCPCS code C2645 of $1.02 per mm
2
. In response to comments from interested parties, we agreed that, given the limited claims data available and a new outpatient indication for C2645, a payment rate for HCPCS code C2645 based on the geometric mean cost of $1.02 per mm
2
may not adequately reflect the cost of HCPCS code C2645. In the CY 2020 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period, we finalized our policy to use our equitable adjustment authority under section 1833(t)(2)(E) of the Act, which states that the Secretary shall establish, in a budget neutral manner, other adjustments as determined to be necessary to ensure equitable payments, to maintain the CY 2019 payment rate of $4.69 per mm
2
for HCPCS code C2645 for CY 2020. Similarly, in the absence of sufficient claims data to establish an APC payment rate, in the CY 2021, CY 2022, and CY 2023 OPPS/ASC final rules with comment period (85 FR 85879 and 85880 and 86 FR 63469 and 87 FR 71760 and 71761), we finalized our policy to use our equitable adjustment authority under section 1833(t)(2)(E) of the Act to maintain the CY 2019 payment rate of $4.69 per mm
2
for HCPCS code C2645 for CY 2021, for CY 2022, and for CY 2023.

We reviewed CY 2022 claims data available for the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, and we observed three claims that reported HCPCS code C2645. Each claim reported one unit of HCPCS code C2645 and the geometric mean unit cost from these three claims was $168.67. We stated we were unable to use these claims for ratesetting purposes given the reporting of only one unit per claim and the high geometric mean cost. Therefore, we proposed to use our equitable adjustment authority under section 1833(t)(2)(E) of the Act to maintain the CY 2023 payment rate of $4.69 per mm
2
for HCPCS code C2645, which we proposed to assign to APC 2648 (Brachytx planar, p-103), for CY 2024.

For this final rule with comment period, we once again reviewed CY 2022 claims data available; and we observed the same three claims that reported HCPCS code C2645.

Additionally, for CY 2022 and subsequent calendar years, we adopted a Universal Low Volume APC policy for clinical and brachytherapy APCs. As discussed in further detail in section X.C of the CY 2022 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (86 FR 63743 through 63747), we adopted this policy to mitigate wide variation in payment rates that occur from year to year for APCs with low utilization. Such volatility in payment rates from year to year can result in even lower utilization and potential barriers to access. Brachytherapy APCs that have fewer than 100 single claims used for ratesetting purposes are designated as Low Volume APCs unless an alternative payment rate is applied, such as the use of our equitable adjustment authority under section 1833(t)(2)(E) of the Act in the case of APC 2648 (Brachytx planar, p-103), for which HCPCS code C2645 (Brachytherapy planar source, palladium-103, per square millimeter) is the only code assigned as discussed previously in this section.

For CY 2024, we proposed to designate five brachytherapy APCs as Low Volume APCs as these APCs meet

our criteria to be designated as a Low Volume APC. For more information on the brachytherapy APCs we proposed to designate as Low Volume APCs, see section III.D of the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (88 FR 49628) and section III.D of this final rule with comment period.

We invited interested parties to submit recommendations for new codes to describe new brachytherapy sources. We will continue to add new brachytherapy source codes and descriptors to our systems for payment on a quarterly basis.

We did not receive any public comments on either proposal described. We are finalizing, without modification, to use our equitable adjustment authority under section 1833(t)(2)(E) of the Act to maintain the CY 2023 payment rate of $4.69 per mm
2
for HCPCS code C2645, which is assigned to APC 2648 (Brachytx planar, p-103), for CY 2024.

Similarly, for CY 2024 and subsequent years we are finalizing, without modification, our proposal to continue to set the payment rates for other brachytherapy sources that are not otherwise assigned to designated Low Volume APCs for CY 2024 using our established prospective payment methodology. The final CY 2024 payment rates for brachytherapy sources are included in Addendum B to this final rule with comment period (which is available via the internet on the CMS website) and are identified with status indicator “U.” We continue to invite interested parties to submit recommendations for new codes to describe new brachytherapy sources. Such recommendations should be directed via email to
outpatientpps@cms.hhs.gov
or by mail to the Division of Outpatient Care, Mail Stop C4-01-26, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244. We will continue to add new brachytherapy source codes and descriptors to our systems for payment on a quarterly basis.

b. Comprehensive APCs (C-APCs) for CY 2024

(1) Background

In the CY 2014 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (78 FR 74861 through 74910), we finalized a comprehensive payment policy that packages payment for adjunctive and secondary items, services, and procedures into the most costly primary procedure under the OPPS at the claim level. The policy was finalized in CY 2014, but the effective date was delayed until January 1, 2015, to allow additional time for further analysis, opportunity for public comment, and systems preparation. The comprehensive APC (C-APC) policy was implemented effective January 1, 2015, with modifications and clarifications in response to public comments received regarding specific provisions of the C-APC policy (79 FR 66798 through 66810).

A C-APC is defined as a classification for the provision of a primary service and all adjunctive services provided to support the delivery of the primary service. We established C-APCs as a category broadly for OPPS payment and implemented 25 C-APCs beginning in CY 2015 (79 FR 66809 and 66810). We have gradually added new C-APCs since the policy was implemented beginning in CY 2015, with the number of C-APCs now totaling 72 (80 FR 70332; 81 FR 79584 and 79585; 83 FR 58844 through 58846; 84 FR 61158 through 61166; 85 FR 85885; 86 FR 63474; and 87 FR 71769).

Under our C-APC policy, we designate a service described by a HCPCS code assigned to a C-APC as the primary service when the service is identified by OPPS status indicator “J1.” When such a primary service is reported on a hospital outpatient claim, taking into consideration the few exceptions that are discussed below, we make payment for all other items and services reported on the hospital outpatient claim as being integral, ancillary, supportive, dependent, and adjunctive to the primary service (hereinafter collectively referred to as “adjunctive services”) and representing components of a complete comprehensive service (78 FR 74865 and 79 FR 66799). Payments for adjunctive services are packaged into the payments for the primary services. This results in a single prospective payment for each of the primary, comprehensive services based on the costs of all reported services at the claim level. One example of a primary service would be a partial mastectomy and an example of a secondary service packaged into that primary service would be a radiation therapy procedure.

Services excluded from the C-APC policy under the OPPS include services that are not covered OPD services, services that cannot by statute be paid for under the OPPS, and services that are required by statute to be separately paid. This includes certain mammography and ambulance services that are not covered OPD services in accordance with section 1833(t)(1)(B)(iv) of the Act; brachytherapy seeds, which also are required by statute to receive separate payment under section 1833(t)(2)(H) of the Act; pass-through payment drugs and devices, which also require separate payment under section 1833(t)(6) of the Act; self-administered drugs (SADs) that are not otherwise packaged as supplies because they are not covered under Medicare Part B under section 1861(s)(2)(B) of the Act; and certain preventive services (78 FR 74865 and 79 FR 66800 and 66801). A list of services excluded from the C-APC policy is included in Addendum J to this final rule with comment period (which is available via the internet on the CMS website at
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/hospital-outpatient/regulations-notices
). If a service does not appear on this list of excluded services, payment for it will be packaged into the payment for the primary C-APC service when it appears on an outpatient claim with a primary C-APC service.

The C-APC policy payment methodology set forth in the CY 2014 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period and modified and implemented beginning in CY 2015 is summarized as follows (78 FR 74887 and 79 FR 66800):

Basic Methodology.
As stated in the CY 2015 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period, we define the C-APC payment policy as including all covered OPD services on a hospital outpatient claim reporting a primary service that is assigned to status indicator “J1,”
1

excluding services that are not covered OPD services or that cannot by statute be paid for under the OPPS. Services and procedures described by HCPCS codes assigned to status indicator “J1” are assigned to C-APCs based on our usual APC assignment methodology by evaluating the geometric mean costs of the primary service claims to establish resource similarity and the clinical characteristics of each procedure to establish clinical similarity within each APC.

1
Status indicator “J1” denotes Hospital Part B Services Paid Through a Comprehensive APC. Further information can be found in CY 2024 Addendum D1.

In the CY 2016 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period, we expanded the C-APC payment methodology to qualifying extended assessment and management encounters through the “Comprehensive Observation Services” C-APC (C-APC 8011). Services within this APC are assigned status indicator “J2.”
2

Specifically, we make a payment through C-APC 8011 for a claim that:

2
Status indicator “J2” denotes Hospital Part B Services That May Be Paid Through a Comprehensive APC. Further information can be found in CY 2024 Addendum D1.

• Does not contain a procedure described by a HCPCS code to which we have assigned status indicator “T;”

• Contains 8 or more units of services described by HCPCS code G0378 (Hospital observation services, per hour);

• Contains services provided on the same date of service or one day before the date of service for HCPCS code G0378 that are described by one of the following codes: HCPCS code G0379 (Direct admission of patient for hospital observation care) on the same date of service as HCPCS code G0378; CPT code 99281 (Emergency department visit for the evaluation and management of a patient (Level 1)); CPT code 99282 (Emergency department visit for the evaluation and management of a patient (Level 2)); CPT code 99283 (Emergency department visit for the evaluation and management of a patient (Level 3)); CPT code 99284 (Emergency department visit for the evaluation and management of a patient (Level 4)); CPT code 99285 (Emergency department visit for the evaluation and management of a patient (Level 5)) or HCPCS code G0380 (Type B emergency department visit (Level 1)); HCPCS code G0381 (Type B emergency department visit (Level 2)); HCPCS code G0382 (Type B emergency department visit (Level 3)); HCPCS code G0383 (Type B emergency department visit (Level 4)); HCPCS code G0384 (Type B emergency department visit (Level 5)); CPT code 99291 (Critical care, evaluation and management of the critically ill or critically injured patient; first 30-74 minutes); or HCPCS code G0463 (Hospital outpatient clinic visit for assessment and management of a patient); and

• Does not contain services described by a HCPCS code to which we have assigned status indicator “J1.”

The assignment of status indicator “J2” to a specific set of services performed in combination with each other allows for all other OPPS payable services and items reported on the claim (excluding services that are not covered OPD services or that cannot by statute be paid for under the OPPS) to be deemed adjunctive services representing components of a comprehensive service and resulting in a single prospective payment for the comprehensive service based on the costs of all reported services on the claim (80 FR 70333 through 70336).

Services included under the C-APC payment packaging policy, that is, services that are typically adjunctive to the primary service and provided during the delivery of the comprehensive service, include diagnostic procedures, laboratory tests, and other diagnostic tests and treatments that assist in the delivery of the primary procedure; visits and evaluations performed in association with the procedure; uncoded services and supplies used during the service; durable medical equipment as well as prosthetic and orthotic items and supplies when provided as part of the outpatient service; and any other components reported by HCPCS codes that represent services that are provided during the complete comprehensive service (78 FR 74865 and 79 FR 66800).

In addition, payment for hospital outpatient department services that are similar to therapy services, such as speech language pathology, and delivered either by therapists or nontherapists is included as part of the payment for the packaged complete comprehensive service. These services that are provided during the perioperative period are adjunctive services and are deemed not to be therapy services as described in section 1834(k) of the Act, regardless of whether the services are delivered by therapists or other nontherapist health care workers. We have previously noted that therapy services are those provided by therapists under a plan of care in accordance with section 1835(a)(2)(C) and section 1835(a)(2)(D) of the Act and are paid for under section 1834(k) of the Act, subject to annual therapy caps as applicable (78 FR 74867 and 79 FR 66800). However, certain other services similar to therapy services are considered and paid for as hospital outpatient department services. Payment for these nontherapy outpatient department services that are reported with therapy codes and provided with a comprehensive service is included in the payment for the packaged complete comprehensive service. We note that these services, even though they are reported with therapy codes, are hospital outpatient department services and not therapy services. We refer readers to the July 2016 OPPS Change Request 9658 (Transmittal 3523) for further instructions on reporting these services in the context of a C-APC service.

Items included in the packaged payment provided in conjunction with the primary service also include all drugs, biologicals, and radiopharmaceuticals, regardless of cost, except those drugs with pass-through payment status and SADs, unless they function as packaged supplies (78 FR 74868, 74869, and 74909 and 79 FR 66800). We refer readers to Section 50.2M, Chapter 15, of the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual for a description of our policy on SADs treated as hospital outpatient supplies, including lists of SADs that function as supplies and those that do not function as supplies.
3

3

https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/Downloads/bp102c15.pdf.

We define each hospital outpatient claim reporting a single unit of a single primary service assigned to status indicator “J1” as a single “J1” unit procedure claim (78 FR 74871 and 79 FR 66801). Line-item charges for services included on the C-APC claim are converted to line-item costs, which are then summed to develop the estimated APC costs. These claims are then assigned one unit of the service with status indicator “J1” and later used to develop the geometric mean costs for the C-APC relative payment weights. (We note that we use the term “comprehensive” to describe the geometric mean cost of a claim reporting “J1” service(s) or the geometric mean cost of a C-APC, inclusive of all the items and services included in the C-APC service payment bundle.) Charges for services that would otherwise be separately payable are added to the charges for the primary service. This process differs from our traditional cost accounting methodology only in that all such services on the claim are packaged (except certain services as described above). We apply our standard data trims, which exclude claims with extremely high primary units or extreme costs.

The comprehensive geometric mean costs are used to establish resource similarity and, along with clinical similarity, dictate the assignment of the primary services to the C-APCs. We establish a ranking of each primary service (single unit only) to be assigned to status indicator “J1” according to its comprehensive geometric mean costs. For the minority of claims reporting more than one primary service assigned to status indicator “J1” or units thereof, we identify one “J1” service as the primary service for the claim based on our cost-based ranking of primary services. We then assign these multiple “J1” procedure claims to the C-APC to which the service designated as the primary service is assigned. If the reported “J1” services on a claim map to different C-APCs, we designate the “J1” service assigned to the C-APC with the highest comprehensive geometric mean cost as the primary service for that claim. If the reported multiple “J1” services on a claim map to the same C-APC, we designate the most costly service (at the HCPCS code level) as the primary service for that claim. This

process results in initial assignments of claims for the primary services assigned to status indicator “J1” to the most appropriate C-APCs based on both single and multiple procedure claims reporting these services and clinical and resource homogeneity.

Complexity Adjustments.
We use complexity adjustments to provide increased payment for certain comprehensive services. We apply a complexity adjustment by promoting qualifying paired “J1” service code combinations or paired code combinations of “J1” services and certain add-on codes (as described further below) from the originating C-APC (the C-APC to which the designated primary service is first assigned) to the next higher paying C-APC in the same clinical family of C-APCs. We apply this type of complexity adjustment when the paired code combination represents a complex, costly form or version of the primary service according to the following criteria:

• Frequency of 25 or more claims reporting the code combination (frequency threshold); and

• Violation of the 2 times rule, as stated in section 1833(t)(2) of the Act and section III.B.2 of this final rule with comment period, in the originating C-APC (cost threshold).

These criteria identify paired code combinations that occur commonly and exhibit materially greater resource requirements than the primary service. The CY 2017 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (81 FR 79582) included a revision to the complexity adjustment eligibility criteria. Specifically, we finalized a policy to discontinue the requirement that a code combination (that qualifies for a complexity adjustment by satisfying the frequency and cost criteria thresholds described above) also not create a 2 times rule violation in the higher level or receiving APC.

After designating a single primary service for a claim, we evaluate that service in combination with each of the other procedure codes reported on the claim assigned to status indicator “J1” (or certain add-on codes) to determine if there are paired code combinations that meet the complexity adjustment criteria. For a new HCPCS code, we determine initial C-APC assignment and qualification for a complexity adjustment using the best available information, crosswalking the new HCPCS code to a predecessor code(s) when appropriate.

Once we have determined that a particular code combination of “J1” services (or combinations of “J1” services reported in conjunction with certain add-on codes) represents a complex version of the primary service because it is sufficiently costly, frequent, and a subset of the primary comprehensive service overall according to the criteria described above, we promote the claim including the complex version of the primary service as described by the code combination to the next higher cost C-APC within the clinical family, unless the primary service is already assigned to the highest cost APC within the C-APC clinical family or assigned to the only C-APC in a clinical family. We do not create new APCs with a comprehensive geometric mean cost that is higher than the highest geometric mean cost (or only) C-APC in a clinical family just to accommodate potential complexity adjustments. Therefore, the highest payment for any claim including a code combination for services assigned to a C-APC would be the highest paying C-APC in the clinical family (79 FR 66802).

We package payment for all add-on codes into the payment for the C-APC. However, certain primary service add-on combinations may qualify for a complexity adjustment. As noted in the CY 2016 OPPS/ASC final rule with comment period (80 FR 70331), all add-on codes that can be appropriately reported in combination with a base code that describes a primary “J1” service are evaluated for a complexity adjustment.

To determine which combinations of primary service codes reported in conjunction with an add-on code may qualify for a complexity adjustment for CY 2024, we apply the frequency and cost criteria thresholds discussed above, testing claims reporting one unit of a single primary service assigned to status indicator “J1” and any number of units of a single add-on code for the primary “J1” service. If the frequency and cost criteria thresholds for a complexity adjustment are met and reassignment to the next higher cost APC in the clinical family is appropriate (based on meeting the criteria outlined above), we make a complexity adjustment for the code combination; that is, we reassign the primary service code reported in conjunction with the add-on code to the next higher cost C-APC within the same clinical family of C-APCs. As previously stated, we package payment for add-on codes into the C-APC payment rate. If any

[Text truncated at 120,000 characters. The full text is on the page linked above.]

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/fr%3A2023-24293. Public record. Not legal advice.
