# Commissions and Joint Committees Established to Commemorate the Anniversary of the Birth of a President or First Lady,1950-2000

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/crs%3ARL30980

## Record

- **Collection:** Congressional research report
- **Document type:** CRS Report
- **Published:** June 15, 2001
- **Citation:** RL30980

## Text

Order Code RL30980

CRS Report for Congress
Received through the CRS Web

Commissions and Joint Committees Established
to Commemorate the Anniversary of the Birth of a
President or First Lady,1950-2000

Updated June 15, 2001

Stephen W. Stathis
Specialist in American National Government
and Project Coordinator
Government and Finance Division

Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

Commissions and Joint Committees Established to
Commemorate the Anniversary of the Birth of a
President or First Lady,1950-2000
Summary
Since 1950, Congress on eight separate occasions has established a commission
to develop suitable plans for celebrating the anniversary of the birth of an American
President or First Lady. For two other Presidents, Congress established a Special
Joint Committee on Arrangements to coordinate commemorative events planned in
the Congress with those being arranged by nongovernmental committees. The
purpose of this report is to capture at least the essence of the work of these
commemorative bodies during the past half century by reviewing their membership,
funding, objectives, organization, professional staff, projects and activities, and
recommendations. It thus seeks to provide a context and perspective for
congressional consideration of future anniversary commemorations.
The statutory responsibilities, membership, and funding of the commemorative
commissions have varied significantly, reflecting both the wishes of Congress, as
expressed in the commission’s legislative charters, and the vast differences that
distinguished the men and woman being honored. The membership of statutory
commemorative commissions has included a mix of Members of Congress, occupants
of specified positions, and private citizens. Public funding for these commissions has
varied from $10,000 to over $500,000. Some have operated chiefly through an
executive committee, and others largely in coordination with private institutions.
Several have designated or hired an executive director and a limited number of
professional staff, while in two instances public relations firms were employed to
handle certain aspects of a commemoration.
Various commemorative commissions have organized or arranged for a wide
variety of activities, including: presidential proclamations, joint sessions of Congress,
conferences, publications and television programs, commemorative ceremonies,
memorial services, awards, performances, exhibits, monuments, numismatic and
philatelic issues, tours, information packets, and other means of encouraging
participation in any such activities.
The record of these commissions shows that substantial preparation,
organization, commitment, and a reasonable amount of lead time are required to bring
to fruition the level of commemoration envisioned, and allow for the congressional
intent to be fully realized.

Contributors to this Report
Mildred Amer

Eleanor Roosevelt Centennial Commission

Richard S. Beth

Dwight D. Eisenhower Centennial Commission

Paul Dwyer

James Madison Memorial Commission and
James Madison Advisory Commission

Paul Rundquist

Franklin D. Roosevelt Centennial Joint Committee
Harry S Truman Centennial Joint Committee

Stephen Stathis

Woodrow Wilson Centennial Commission
Theodore Roosevelt Centennial Commission
Lincoln Sesquicentennial Commission
Thomas Jefferson Commemoration Commission

Sandy Streeter

Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission

Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Woodrow Wilson Centennial Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Membership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Public and Private Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Professional Staff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Projects and Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Commission Publications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Role as Coordinator of Centennial Activities Nationwide . . . . . . . . . . 6
Major Research Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Assistance in the Preparation of The Greatness of Woodrow Wilson,
1856-1956 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Theodore Roosevelt Centennial Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Membership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Public and Private Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Professional Staff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Projects and Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Commission Publications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Role as Coordinator of Centennial Activities Nationwide . . . . . . . . . 11
Project to Revitalize Independence Day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Commemorative Activities Abroad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Unfinished Business of the Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Lincoln Sesquicentennial Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Membership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Public and Private Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Professional Staff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Projects and Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Commission Publications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Role as Coordinator of Sesquicentennial Activities Nationwide . . . . 16
Publication of Lincoln Day By Day: A Chronology, 1809-1865 . . . . 17
Artistic, Philatelic, and Numismatic Endeavors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Sesquicentennial Activities Abroad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
National Lincoln Sesquicentennial Dinner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Awards Bestowed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Joint Meeting of Congress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Franklin D. Roosevelt Centennial Joint Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Membership of Joint Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Appropriations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Organization and Staff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Joint Meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Related Official Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Harry S Truman Centennial Joint Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Membership of Joint Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Appropriations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Organization and Staff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Joint Meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Related Official Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Other Commemorative Events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Commission on the Eleanor Roosevelt Centennial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Membership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Public and Private Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Professional Staff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Projects and Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
The Story of the “Eleanor” Traveling Museum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Eleanor Roosevelt Packet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Role as Coordinator of Centennial Activities Nationwide . . . . . . . . . 32
Awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Commemorative Activities Abroad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Philatelic Endeavors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Dwight David Eisenhower Centennial Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Membership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Public and Private Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Professional Staff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Projects and Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Publications and Productions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Legislative Enactments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Other Governmental Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Role as Coordinator of Centennial Activities Nationwide . . . . . . . . . 37
Joint Meeting of Congress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
White House Centennial Luncheon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Thomas Jefferson Commemoration Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Membership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Public and Private Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Professional Staff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Projects and Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Conference on Jefferson and the Changing West: From Conquest
to Conservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
School and Civic Learning Initiatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

Thomas Jefferson: World Citizen Symposia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Jefferson Radio Conversations and Television Forums . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Presidential Proclamation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Op Ed Piece . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
USIA Poster Show on Jefferson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Recognition of Schools Named After the Third President . . . . . . . . . 50
Conference on Current State of Jefferson Scholarship . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Commission Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Membership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Public and Private Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Organization and Powers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Professional Staff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Commission Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
James Madison Commemoration Commission and
James Madison Commemoration Advisory Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Membership: Commemoration Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Membership: Advisory Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Public and Private Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Objectives: Commemoration Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Objectives: Advisory Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
Staffing and Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Commission Web Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Student Essay Contest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Madison Symposium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Library of Congress Exhibit: “Madison Treasures” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Library of Congress Web Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59

Commissions and Joint Committees
Established to Commemorate the
Anniversary of the Birth of a President or
First Lady,1950-2000
Introduction
During the past half century, Congress on eight separate occasions has
established a commission to develop suitable plans for celebrating the centennial or
other major anniversary of the birth of an American President or First Lady. The
statutory responsibilities, membership, and funding of these commemorative
commissions have varied significantly, reflecting both the wishes of Congress, as
expressed in the commissions’ legislative charters, and the vast differences which
distinguished the men and woman being honored. On two other occasions, Congress
established a Special Joint Committee on Arrangements to coordinate events planned
in Congress to commemorate the centennial of the birth of a President with those
being arranged by nongovernmental committees.
For one commemoration, Congress adopted neither of these approaches but
instead directed executive agencies to organize and coordinate the appropriate
activities at the honoree’s birthplace,1 and provided grants to an existing institution
named in his memory.2 This approach is beyond the scope of the present survey.
The membership of statutory commemorative commissions has included a mix
of Members of Congress, occupants of specified positions (ex officio), and private
citizens. Members of Congress are usually selected by the leadership of both parties

1

In 1974, Congress called upon the “Secretary of Interior and the Administrator of General
Services to cause to be conducted on or about August 10, 1974, appropriate ceremonies in
celebration of the one hundredth anniversary of the birth of Herbert Hoover, thirty-first
President of the United States, in the town of West Branch, Iowa.” S. Con. Res. 79, 93rd
Cong., 2nd sess., 88 Stat. 2407. See also: “The 100th Anniversary of the Birth of Herbert
Hoover,” Congressional Record, vol. 120, July 11, 1974, p. 22754; and Aug. 6, 1974, pp.
26963-26966.
2

In recognition of the “fifty years of extraordinary and selfless public service of Herbert
Hoover, including his many great humanitarian endeavors, his chairmanship of two
Commissions of the Organization of the Executive Branch, and his service as thirty-first
President of the United States, and in commemoration of the one hundredth anniversary of his
birth on August 10, 1974,” Congress authorized $7,000,0000 in matching grants to the
Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace, Stanford University, Stanford California.
P.L. 93-585, 88 Stat. 1918-1919. The money was authorized in January 1975 and
appropriated in August 1975. P.L. 93-585, 88 Stat. 1919; and P.L. 94-91, 89 Stat. 442.

CRS-2
or because of a position they hold on pertinent committees. The ex officio positions
have included congressional leaders, government officials, and officers of private
institutions. In some instances the enabling act called for the private citizens to be
appointed by congressional leaders, in other cases by the President, and sometimes by
both. Also, there has on occasion been a requirement that the private citizens
appointed exhibit particular qualifications or experience. Funding for commemorative
commissions as well as their statutory objectives and organizational structure have
varied widely.
It is clear from an examination of the final reports of the commemorative
commissions that substantial preparation, organization, commitment, and a reasonable
amount of lead time are required to bring to fruition the level of commemoration
envisioned, and allow for the congressional intent to be fully realized.
The accomplishments of these commemorative commissions and joint
committees are as diverse as the individuals being honored. Prominent among the
activities and events planned, organized, coordinated, encouraged, and supported by
these commissions and committees have been:
! Acquiring and preserving artifacts;
! Addresses, conferences and symposia both in the United States and abroad;
! Art exhibits, concerts, and balls;
! Awards for work and achievements similar to the honoree’s, or in recognition
of participation in a commemoration;
! Books and research projects on the honoree;
! Centennial tours and cruises;
! Commemorative programs at birthplaces and homes;
! Commemorative stamps;
! Essay competition among the nation’s students in public and private secondary
schools;
! Fellowships;
! International commemorative ceremonies;
! Joint meetings of Congress;
! Memorial services and dedicatory ceremonies;
! Monuments, memorials, sculpture and plaques;
! Naming or funding government and nongovernmental programs in
commemoration of the honoree;
! Newsletters, information packets, teacher’s guides, and other types of
publications designed to generate support for the commemoration, stimulate
participation in the planned activities, and further educate the public of the
honoree’s contributions to the nation;
! Numismatic and philatelic issues;
! Parades;
! Performing arts presentations;
! Presidential proclamations calling upon the American people to become active
participants in the commemoration;
! Publication of the honoree’s writings;
! Recognition of schools that had been named after an honoree;
! Television and radio programs focusing on an honoree;
! Time capsules;

CRS-3
! Traveling exhibits; and
! Web sites.

Also, several commissions engaged in projects designed to more fully involve
Congress, federal executive agencies, state and local governments, local historical
societies, national civic, fraternal, educational, religious, and media groups, trade
organizations, labor unions, newspapers, magazines, and broadcast media, motion
picture industry, clubs, business and industry associations, interested individuals
throughout the country, and foreign governments in activities of the kinds identified.
Throughout American history, congressional recognition of the contributions of
the nation’s Presidents has also been expressed through a broad range of
commemorative legislation. These statutory gestures have embraced historic sites
such as birthplaces, homes, burial plots, and locations of special significance; libraries,
memorials and monuments; numismatic issues; and special commemorative
commissions. Basic to each of these actions has been a desire to develop a greater
appreciation among the American people of the efforts of those being honored.
Today, many of the commemorative enactments honoring former Presidents continue
as permanent and tangible reminders of another time and era. Much of the work of
commemorative commissions and special joint committees on commemorative
arrangements, is, on the other hand, often recorded only in a report to Congress or
in the Congressional Record, and frequently retains only nostalgic value for the
participants at the time of their occurrence.
The purpose of this report is to capture at least the essence of the work of these
commemorative bodies during the past half century. It provides an overview of each
commission’s or committee’s membership, funding, objectives, organization,
professional staff, projects and activities, and recommendations. The breadth and
depth of their efforts are substantial, impressive, and important. Their examination
is useful both as a reminder of what types of activities have been deemed appropriate
for such commemorations in the past and as a guide for creating a workable
framework in the future.

Woodrow Wilson Centennial Commission
The Woodrow Wilson Centennial Commission was established on August 30,
1954, by P.L. 83-705.

Membership
The commission was composed of 12 members. In accordance with the
commission’s legislative charter its membership included:
! Two Senators appointed by the President of the Senate;
! Two Representatives appointed by the Speaker of the House of
Representatives;

CRS-4
! The Director of the National Park Service, who served as executive officer of
the commission; and
! Seven members appointed by the President of the United States after
consultation with the Governor of Virginia, the Woodrow Wilson Birthplace
Foundation, Inc., and the Woodrow Wilson Foundation.

General E. Walton Opie, who was appointed by the President, served as
commission chairman. Members of the commission served without compensation but
were reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred in the discharge of their
duties.3

Public and Private Funding
Initially, $10,000 was appropriated for the commission. Congress subsequently
appropriated an additional $41,500 in July 1955, and $48,500 in March 1956.4 The
commission was “authorized to accept donations of money, property, or personal
services; to cooperate with patriotic and historical societies and with institutions of
learning, and to call upon other federal departments or agencies for their advice and
assistance.”5

Objectives
Congress charged the commission with the responsibility for developing and
executing “suitable plans for celebrating, in 1956, the 100th anniversary of the birth of
President Woodrow Wilson. In carrying out these functions the Commission [was]
authorized to cooperate with and to assist the Commission established by the State
of Virginia to plan a Wilson centennial celebration ... and to invite all the people of
the United States to join therein.”6

3

68 Stat. 965-966. Commission members appointed by the President of the Senate, Vice
President Richard M. Nixon, were: Senators Howard Alexander Smith of New Jersey and
Willis Robertson of Virginia. Commission members appointed by the Speaker of the House,
Joseph W. Martin of Massachusetts, were: Representatives Peter Frelinghuysen of New Jersey
and Burr P. Harrison of Virginia. Commission members appointed by the President were
General E. Walton Opie, Virginia (chairman); Mrs. Elm Bowles Alsop, Virginia; Bernard M.
Baruch, New York; David K. Bruce, Virginia; Arthur Hays Sulzberger, New York; Arthur
Sweetser, Washington, D.C.; and Robert W. Woodruff, Georgia. Conrad L. Wirth, Director
of the National Park Service, served as the commission’s executive officer. U.S. Woodrow
Wilson Centennial Celebration Commission, Woodrow Wilson Centennial: Final Report of
the Woodrow Wilson Centennial Celebration Commission (Washington: GPO, 1958), p. 15.
4

69 Stat. 157, 519; and 70 Stat. 273.

5

68 Stat. 965.

6

68 Stat. 966. See also U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Woodrow Wilson
Centennial Celebration, report to accompany S.J.Res. 147, S.Rept. 1696, 83rd Cong., 2nd
sess. (Washington: GPO, 1954), 2 p.

CRS-5

Organization
By the time the chairman and other presidential members of the commission had
been appointed in the spring of 1955, a great deal of preparatory work had already
been completed by Conrad L. Wirth, Director of the National Park Service (who
served as the commission’s executive officer), and the staff of the Park Service.
Much of this work was done by the Park Service’s Branch of History, headed by
Herbert E. Kahler, its chief historian.
The commission’s organization was completed during its early meetings, the first
of which took place in May 1955. A number of special committees were appointed
by the chairman to explore certain specific areas of possible commission activity.
“The most important organizational step, however, was the establishment of an
Executive Committee.” Since the members of the commission were “also heavily
engaged in their regular pursuits and many of them lived at a distance from
Washington, the seat of the commission’s headquarters, it became clear quite early
that it would not be practicable to call frequent meetings of the full membership.”7
To facilitate the commission’s work, the chairman was accordingly authorized
to appoint a small committee of general competence that could meet frequently,
consider numerous policy questions, and act promptly on behalf of the commission.
“This group, while it in no sense superseded the commission as a whole—indeed, all
Commission members were invited to attend its sessions and its actions were fully
reported to the parent body—served as the active and continuous policy arm of the
Commission.”8 From the summer of 1955 until early in 1957, the executive
committee met once a month in Washington to plan the broad outlines of the
commission’s activities.

Professional Staff
For most of the commission’s life, the staff consisted of two employees, Edmund
C. Gass, the secretary of the commission, and an office secretary. Periodically, when
it was deemed necessary, a clerk-typist and a writer were also retained. Given the
difficulty in finding “competent persons who were willing to sever their established
ties in order to work for an agency with a relatively short life,” the commission
entrusted its public relations work to the firm of Edward K. Moss.9

Projects and Activities
Quite early the commission decided against placing major emphasis on directly
planning and producing its own commemorative ceremonies honoring Woodrow
Wilson. A number of programs of that type had already been scheduled by the
Virginia Centennial Commission, the Woodrow Wilson Foundation, and the

7

Woodrow Wilson Centennial Celebration. Final Report, p. 17.

8

Ibid.

9

Ibid., p. 18.

CRS-6
Woodrow Wilson Birthplace Foundation, and many communities and institutions
closely associated with Wilson’s career.
“As a Federal agency established by Congress, the members regarded theirs as
the only organization with sufficient authority and prestige to give the Centennial
Year an official character of national scope.” The commission considered its primary
responsibility was “to enable all Americans to have a part in the Centennial.” To
achieve this end, the commission concentrated most of its energies and resources on
(1) seeking to enlist the active participation of the entire nation in the various Wilson
centennial celebrations; and (2) working closely with the organizations and groups
responsible for these activities.10
Commission Publications. The principal publications used by the
commission to reach the general public and stimulate participation were an illustrated
Handbook of Information and Suggestions and a Woodrow Wilson Centennial
Newsletter.
During the course of the centennial year, the commission issued 28 news releases
to some 5,000 publications. In December 1956, the commission encouraged more
than 200 major newspapers to carry editorials commemorating Wilson on December
28, the centennial of his birth. Approximately 90% of the newspapers solicited
responded favorably.11
Role as Coordinator of Centennial Activities Nationwide. Specific
projects successfully undertaken by the commission resulted in the issuance of a
Woodrow Wilson commemorative stamp;12 legislation designating the Woodrow
Wilson Bridge as a physical memorial to the late President;13 nationwide distribution
of the President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s proclamation on the “Woodrow Wilson
Centennial Year;” and the issuance of similar proclamations by 39 state Governors.14
In addition the commission encouraged the mayors of all cities having a
population of 5,000 or more to appoint committees to plan and coordinate activities
in their localities, and sent letters to the officers and leaders of citizens groups at both
the local and national level encouraging them to participate in these activities. Similar
letters were also sent to state and local school administrators, religious organizations,
libraries, colleges and universities, professional educational organizations, and each
of the federal agencies.15

10

Ibid., p. 19.

11

Ibid., pp. 26-28. “The flood of newspaper comment and articles on Wilson appearing on
his 100th birthday [also] touched every country in Europe.” Ibid., p. 183.
12

Ibid., pp. 22-25.

13

70 Stat. 185-186

14

Ibid., pp. 25-26. See also: 70 Stat. 118.

15

A compilation of the centennial celebrations in the United States and abroad is found in
Woodrow Wilson Centennial Celebration. Final Report, pp. 182-210.

CRS-7
The commission also worked very closely with both of the special Virginia
organizations—the State Commission and the Birthplace Foundation—and with the
Woodrow Wilson Foundation. In addition, members of the commission were active
participants in the two major memorial ceremonies at the Washington National
Cathedral on February 3 and November 11, 1956.16
Major Research Project. “One of the Commission’s most important
enterprises had nothing to do with Centennial Ceremonies and celebration programs,”
but was considered by the commission to “have unique commemorative value far
beyond the centennial year. This was its work looking toward the preparation of a
comprehensive and scholarly edition of Woodrow Wilson’s writings, including his
letters.” Although the commission never planned to edit or publish the Wilson papers,
“its members were eager to encourage such a project when an initial study made by
the secretary clearly demonstrated the need for it.” 17
To achieve this end, the commission authorized a survey of nearly 90 libraries
and other depositories known or thought to contain Wilson manuscripts. Once the
survey was completed, copies of a report summarizing the results were distributed to
those scholars and organizations that were keenly interested in the survey. “As one
of its last official acts, the Commission requested the Woodrow Wilson Foundation
to further this phase of its work, and the Foundation’s board of directors generously
agreed to do so.”18
Assistance in the Preparation of The Greatness of Woodrow
Wilson, 1856-1956. Included among the various cooperative activities of the
commission was an “interested support” of Mrs. Elm Bowles Alsop’s work of
compiling the centennial book, The Greatness of Woodrow Wilson, 1856-1956.
“While the Commission officially authorized this anthology and provided the clerical
assistance to Mrs. Alsop in her work of developing it, she alone planned, arranged,
and edited the volume and made all arrangements for its commercial publication.”
More importantly, “both she and the contributing authors, moreover, donated all
royalties from the book to the Woodrow Wilson Birthplace Memorial Foundation,
with the purpose of establishing a Wilson Memorial Library in Staunton.”19

Theodore Roosevelt Centennial Commission
The Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Commission was established on July 28,
1955, by P.L. 84-183.

16

Ibid., pp. 30-32.

17

Ibid., p. 29.

18

Ibid. A copy of the “Preliminary Survey of the Woodrow Wilson Manuscript,” prepared by
David W. Hirst is found in Ibid., pp. 217-233.
19

Ibid., p. 30.

CRS-8

Membership
The commission was composed of 15 members. In accordance with the
commission’s legislative charter its membership included:
! Two Senators appointed by the President of the Senate;
! Two Representatives appointed by the Speaker of the House of
Representatives;
! Eight members appointed by the President of the United States; and
! The President of the United States, the President of Senate, and the Speaker
of the House of Representatives, ex officio.

Vice President Richard M. Nixon and Senator Joseph C. O’Mahoney were
selected to be chairman and vice chairman, respectively, by the commission from
among its members. Members of the commission served without compensation, but
were reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred in the discharge of their
duties.20

Public and Private Funding
Initially, $10,000 was appropriated for the commission. Congress subsequently
appropriated an additional $163,400 in July 1956.21

Objectives
Congress charged the commission with the responsibility for preparing plans and
a program marking the 100th anniversary of the birth of Theodore Roosevelt in 1958,
and providing for the completion of the development of Theodore Roosevelt Island

20

69 Stat. 383-384. Commission members appointed by the President of the Senate, Vice
President Richard M. Nixon, were: Senators Karl E. Mundt of South Dakota and Joseph C.
O’Mahoney of Wyoming. Commission members appointed by Speaker of the House, Sam
Rayburn of Texas, were: Representatives Steven B. Derounian and Leo W. O’Brien of New
York. Commission members appointed by the President were Mrs. Hazel H. Abel, Nebraska;
C. Norman Brunsdale, North Dakota; Hal Davies, North Dakota; Herman Hagedorn, New
York; Mrs. Sherman Post Haight, Connecticut; Herbert Millen, Pennsylvania; Lowell
Stockman, Oregon; and Oscar S. Straus, New York. Ex officio members of the commission
were President Dwight D. Eisenhower, Vice President Richard M. Nixon, and Speaker of the
House Sam Rayburn of Texas. U.S. Congress, Senate, Final Report of the Theodore
Roosevelt Centennial Commission Relating to a Celebration of the Hundredth Anniversary
of the Birth of Theodore Roosevelt 1858-1958. Pursuant to Public Law 183 of the Eightyfourth Congress, S.Doc. 36, 86th Cong., 1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1959), p. ii.
21

69 Stat. 519; and 70 Stat. 767.

CRS-9
in the Potomac River22 and the Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Park in North
Dakota.23
In preparing its program, the commission was to take into consideration any plan
which might be submitted to it, and “take such steps as [might] be necessary to
coordinate and correlate its plans with those prepared by State and civic bodies.” If
the commission determined that the participation of other nations was appropriate, it
was to “communicate to that end with the governments of such nations through the
State Department.24

Organization
The commission held its initial meeting in Washington on December 16, 1955,
and elected a chairman, vice chairman, secretary, and director. At the same meeting,
an executive committee of eight members was established, and, at the invitation of the
executive director of the Theodore Roosevelt Association, the commission established
its headquarters at Theodore Roosevelt House, Roosevelt’s birthplace at 28 East 20th
Street in New York.25
For the first 18 months, the commission’s activities were devoted to orientation
and preparation. Owing to a lack of adequate travel funds, the commission as a whole
met only once, in February 1956. “Through occasional meetings of the executive
committee,” however, “as well as visits to Washington by the Director and his
assistant, the commissioners who were members of the Senate and House were kept
in close touch with the progress of the work. The other commissioners were kept
informed by correspondence.”26

Professional Staff
Nine people worked for extended periods at commission headquarters. In the
commission’s final report, it singled out several staff responsibilities as particularly
important to the “success of the Commission’s work.” These included “coordination

22

Development of the Theodore Roosevelt Island was to be done in accordance with “An Act
to Establish a Memorial to Theodore Roosevelt in the National Capital,” approved May 21,
1932. 47 Stat. 163; and as amended by an act approved Feb. 11, 1933. 47 Stat. 799.
23

Development of the Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Park was to be done in accordance with
the act which created the park on April 25, 1947. 61 Stat. 52.
24

69 Stat. 384. See also U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Theodore
Roosevelt Commission, report to accompany S.J.Res. 63, S.Rept. 761, 84th Cong., 1st sess.
(Washington: GPO, 1955), 2 p.; and U.S. Congress, House Committee on the Judiciary, One
Hundredth Anniversary of the Birth of Theodore Roosevelt, report to accompany H.J.Res.
273, H.Rept. 918, 84th Cong., 1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1955), 1 p.
25

Final Report of the Theodore Roosevelt Centennial Commission, p. 2.

26

Ibid., p. 7.

CRS-10
of broad range of printed materials; working with various local, State, and Federal
agencies; and active solicitation of support among numerous private organizations.”27

Projects and Activities
Initially, the commission issued “A Call to the American People” to inform them
of the forthcoming observances and to invite their participation. The “Call” was sent
to Members of Congress, Justices of the Supreme Court, leading institutions of higher
learning, and some 300 patriotic, civic, fraternal, and character-building organizations,
and several thousand individuals.28 To further enhance the importance of the
occasion, President Dwight D. Eisenhower, at request of Congress, issued a
proclamation calling upon the American people to become active participants in the
Theodore Roosevelt centennial activities.29 Invitations were subsequently sent to
outstanding citizens throughout the Nation to sponsor the centennial observance
nationally and in their own states and communities. “The response was astonishing,
both in its volume and its warmth.” Included among those who expressed an interest
in such a celebration were the “Chief Justice and several other members of the
Supreme Court, the Secretary of State and other members of the Cabinet, some 40
Members of the Senate, 35 Governors,” and a lengthy list of Congressmen.30
Also willing to support actively the centennial celebration were “leading officials
in the Armed Forces, religious leaders of all the major denominations, university
presidents, historians, naturalists, writers, and other eminent citizens.” Subsequently,
citizens’ groups were established in all 48 States and in the District of Columbia, New
York City, Nassau County, and in several of the U.S. territories and possessions. “At
the request of the Vice President, Dr. L. Quincy Mumford [Librarian of Congress]
consented to head a committee to draw the libraries of the country into the centennial
observance.”31
Commission Publications. “Basic to the work of the Commission” was
Roosevelt’s book, The Free Citizen—A Summons to Service of the Democratic Ideal,
which contained selections from his writings and speeches on the principles and
practices of free government. The book was edited by Hermann Hagedorn, director
of the commission. Originally it was published by Macmillian Co., and then reissued
as a 35-cent paperback edition of 50,000 copies by the commission and the Theodore

27

Ibid., pp. 51-52.

28

Ibid., p. 3. A copy of the call is found in U.S. Congress, Senate, Theodore Roosevelt
Centennial Commission: A Compilation on the Life and Career of Theodore Roosevelt, S.
Doc. 82, 85th Cong., 2nd sess. (Washington: GPO, 1958), pp. 1-2.
29

For the legislation authorizing and requesting the President to issue the proclamation, see:
71 Stat. 617.
30

Ibid., p. 7.

31

Ibid., p. 8. See also U.S. Congress, Senate, Interim Report of the Theodore Roosevelt
Centennial Commission Relating to a Celebration in 1958 of the Hundredth Anniversary
of the Birth of Theodore Roosevelt, S.Doc. 53, 85th Cong., 1st sess. (Washington: GPO,
1957), p. 4.

CRS-11
Roosevelt Association.32 The distribution of this work was “conceived as a major
activity of the Commission.” The stated purpose behind the distribution of this source
material both in the United States and abroad was twofold:
! To strengthen the American people in the struggle for the survival of freedom
in the world by lifting the vision of the responsibilities and the challenge of
citizenship in a republic to the level on which Theodore Roosevelt worked and
fought; and
! To give the free world, in the form of Theodore Roosevelt’s simple and easily
comprehensible code of free government, the unifying element that it so
desperately needs: a common Bible of Democracy.33

Role as Coordinator of Centennial Activities Nationwide. “October
27, 1957, the 99th birthday of Theodore Roosevelt fell on a Sunday, and it was
natural, therefore, even inevitable that the commission should invite the churches of
the Nation to speak the opening words of the centennial observance.”34
An integral part of the commission’s preparations for the centennial during the
next 12 months focused on encouraging participation by the Library of Congress and
a number of executive agencies. The State Department, Department of Defense,
Department of the Interior, United States Information Agency, and National Archives
each planned special programs for the Centennial; and the Post Office Department
issued a suitable commemorative stamp.35
The commission also invited the Natural Resources Council of America to
recommend members for a conservation committee which the commission sought to
establish to remind Council members and the readers of their publications of the part
Roosevelt had played in establishing conservation as a national policy.36
Project to Revitalize Independence Day. Soon after the organization of
the commission, the Theodore Roosevelt Association and some 30 national
organizations were asked and agreed to serve, together with the commission, as
cosponsors of a movement which would restore the Fourth of July, in the Roosevelt
Centennial year, and hopefully in succeeding years to “its traditional appeal as a day
of remembrance and challenge.” Both the “Commission and the Association
recognized that the revitalization of the national observance of the Fourth of July was

32

Final Report of the Theodore Roosevelt Centennial Commission, p. 9.

33

U.S. Congress, Senate, Report of the Theodore Roosevelt Centennial Commission Relating
to a Celebration in 1958 of the Hundredth Anniversary of the Birth of Theodore Roosevelt,
S.Doc. 102, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. (Washington: GPO, 1956), p. 3.
34

Final Report of the Theodore Roosevelt Centennial Commission, p. 13.

35

Interim Report of the Theodore Roosevelt Centennial Commission, pp. 2-4.

36

Final Report of the Theodore Roosevelt Centennial Commission, p. 43. See also Interim
Report of the Theodore Roosevelt Centennial Commission, pp. 9-10.

CRS-12
a long-term project and that all that they could hope to do in the centennial year was
to issue the challenge and trust that it would strike a responsive cord.”37
The commission’s plan to make the Fourth of July an occasion for national
rededication was enthusiastically applauded and supported by President Dwight D.
Eisenhower, as well as Congress. That Independence Day an estimated 215,000
people lined the Potomac River shoreline between Key Bridge and Memorial Bridge
“to see Theodore Roosevelt Island officially dedicated under the glare of the Nation’s
biggest Fourth of July fireworks display.”38
Other centennial celebrations were held in San Francisco and New Bedford,
Massachusetts, and in virtually every state in the Union, Washington, D.C., Alaska,
Hawaii, Guam, and the Panama Canal Zone. “Each developed its own program,
depending on the Federal Commission mainly for printed material which the staff
prepared, and sent, on request, in ‘kits’ of a dozen pieces or more each.”39 No state
proved more enthusiastic or more thorough than North Dakota, the state in which
Roosevelt grew to manhood, while a multiplicity of centennial activities was also held
in New York State, where the late President had been born.
Commemorative Activities Abroad. The centennial was also observed in
25 foreign countries. The Cuban government issued two commemorative stamps.
Great Britain marked the centennial with special lectures at Oxford and Cambridge
Universities. Through the U.S. Information Agency, the sound track of the film,
“Theodore Roosevelt—American” was issued in 10 foreign languages: Turkish,
Bengali, Hebrew, Arabic, Spanish, Portuguese, French, German, Danish and Finnish.
The centennial textbook, The Free Citizen, was translated into Arabic and Tagalog.40
Unfinished Business of the Commission. Despite its many successes,
including completion of the Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Park at Medora, North
Dakota,41 the commission was unable to gain final approval for the development of
Theodore Roosevelt Island. The “Park Service in 1958, actually had funds available
to prepare the ground for the erection of the memorial structure that was proposed
by the Theodore Roosevelt Association, adopted by the commission, and approved
by the National Park Service, the National Commission of Fine Arts, and the National
Capital Planning Commission.” Congress, however, failed to approve legislation that
would have authorized the Secretary of Interior to erect the memorial on Theodore
Roosevelt Island.42
In its final report, the commission focused on what it considered the “moral
obligation” of Congress “to complete the memorial on [Theodore Roosevelt] island

37

Final Report of the Theodore Roosevelt Centennial Commission, pp. 19-21.

38

Ibid., p. 25.

39

Ibid., p. 28.

40

Ibid., pp. 45-46.

41

Interim Report of the Theodore Roosevelt Centennial Commission, p. 11.

42

Final Report of the Theodore Roosevelt Centennial Commission, p. 47.

CRS-13
so generously donated to the people by the Theodore Roosevelt Association.”
Finishing “this project,” the commission argued, “is relatively simple and inexpensive”
and it was hoped Congress would approve such an appropriation before the
commission concluded its work at the end of 1959.43 Federal funds for construction
of a permanent memorial to President Roosevelt were ultimately approved on
September 13, 1960, and work on the memorial began the following July.44

Lincoln Sesquicentennial Commission
The Lincoln Sesquicentennial Commission was established on September 2,
1957, by P.L. 85-262.

Membership
The commission was composed of 28 members. In accordance with the
commission’s legislative charter its membership included:
! The President of the United States, the President of the Senate, and the
Speaker of the House of Representative, who served as ex officio members;
! Six Senators appointed by the President of the Senate;
! Six Representatives appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives;
! Twelve members were appointed by the President of the United States; and
! The Director of the National Park Service, ex officio.

Senator John Sherman Cooper and Representative F. Jay Nimtz were selected
to be chairman and vice chairman respectively by the commission from among its
members. Members of the commission served without compensation but were
furnished transportation and reimbursed at not to exceed $20 per diem, in lieu of
subsistence, while engaged in the discharge of their duties.45

43

Ibid., p. 50.

44

74 Stat. 904-905.

45

71 Stat. 587. Commission members appointed by the President of the Senate, Vice President
Richard M. Nixon, were: John Sherman Cooper of Kentucky; Frank Church of Idaho; Everett
M. Dirksen of Illinois; Paul H. Douglas of Illinois; William E. Jenner of Indiana; Ralph W.
Yarborough of Texas; and Homer E. Capehart of Indiana (appointed to replace Senator
Jenner). Commission members appointed by Speaker of the House, Sam Rayburn of Texas,
were: Leo E. Allen of Illinois; Frank Chelf of Kentucky; Winfield K. Denton of Indiana; Peter
F. Mack, Jr., of Illinois; F. Jay Nimtz of Indiana; John M. Robinson of Kentucky; William
G. Bray of Indiana (appointed to replace Representative Nimtz); and Eugene Siler of
Kentucky (appointed to replace Representative Robinson). Members appointed by the
President were Under Secretary, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Bertha S.
(continued...)

CRS-14

Public and Private Funding
Initially, $37,500 was appropriated for travel expenses of the commission.
Congress subsequently appropriated an additional $350,000 in August 1958, and
$145,000 in June 1959.46 The commission was “authorized to accept donations of
money, property, or personal services; to cooperate with State, civic, patriotic,
hereditary, and historical groups and with institutions of learning, and to call upon
other Federal departments or agencies for their advice and assistance.”47

Objectives
Congress charged the commission with the responsibility of preparing an overall
program for commemorating the 150th anniversary of the birth of Abraham Lincoln
in 1959. In preparing its plans and programs, the commission was to give “due
consideration to any similar and related plans advanced by state, civic, patriotic, and
historical bodies,” and could, if it were considered appropriate, “designate special
committees with representation from the above-mentioned bodies to plan and conduct
specific ceremonies.”48
The commission had the authority to “give suitable recognition such as the award
of medals and certificates or by other appropriate means to persons and organizations
for outstanding accomplishments in preserving the writings and ideals of Abraham
Lincoln or historical locations associated with his life.”

Organization
The first meeting of the commission was held on December 11, 1957, with
Conrad L. Wirth, Director of the National Park Service, presiding as temporary
chairman. At that session a committee of five members was appointed to consider
nominees for the offices of chairman, vice chairman, and secretary to the commission.

45

(...continued)
Adkins, Washington, D.C.; Victor M. Birely, Washington, D.C.; Ralph J. Bunche, New York;
John S. Dickey, New Hampshire; John B. Fisher, Washington, D.C.; R. Gerald McMurtry,
Indiana; Librarian of Congress, L. Quincy Mumford, Washington, D.C.; Paul C. Reinert,
Missouri; Walter N. Rothschild, New York; William G. Stratton, Illinois; Jouett Ross Todd,
Kentucky (resigned August 1958); William H. Townsend, Kentucky; and Senator Sinclair
Weeks of Massachusetts (appointed to replace Mr. Todd). Conrad L. Wirth, Director of the
National Park Service, by law was an ex officio member. U.S. Abraham Lincoln
Sesquicentennial 1959-1960, Abraham Lincoln Sesquicentennial 1959-1960. Final Report
of the Lincoln Sesquicentennial Commission (Washington: GPO, 1960), p. vii.
46

72 Stat. 55, 876; and 73 Stat. 107.

47

71 Stat. 588.

48

71 Stat. 587-588. See also U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Lincoln
Sesquicentennial Commission, report to accompany S.J.Res. 98, S.Rept. 1102, 85th Cong.,
1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1957); and U.S. Congress, House Committee on the Judiciary,
Lincoln Sesquicentennial Commission, report to accompany H.J.Res. 351, H.Rept. 1188, 85th
Cong., 1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1957).

CRS-15
In addition, the commission discussed the nature and scope of its functions, and a
temporary advisory committee was created to outline a program and present it to the
commission at its next meeting.
At its second meeting, the commission elected Senator John Sherman Cooper
of Kentucky as chairman, Representative F. Jay Nimtz of Indiana as vice chairman,
and Conrad L. Wirth as secretary. Subsequently, the chairman was authorized to
appoint an executive committee of seven members empowered to act on behalf of the
commission between its regular meetings. Since frequent meetings of the commission
were not practical, this “small, competent committee was able to meet frequently,
establish policy, and act promptly.” During the two years the commission was in
existence, the full commission held 10 meetings and the executive committee held 25
sessions.49

Professional Staff
The commission’s permanent staff consisted of six employees. These included
an executive director, director of research, assistant executive director, secretary to
the executive director and supervisor of office personnel, research assistant, and
secretary. Periodically, when it was deemed necessary, three administrative assistants
were also employed. An employee of the Department of the Interior was designated
as the commission’s general counsel. Fiscal and accounting matters were handled by
the chief of the Accounting Operations Section, National Park Service.
In July 1958, through the efforts of commission member Senator Everett
Dirksen, space was secured in the National Archives Building as a permanent
headquarters for the commission. That November, the Washington, D.C. firm of
Richard Associates was retained to handle the public relation needs of the
commission.50

Projects and Activities
“The Commission approached the observance with one basic premise—that there
should be participation by all the people in our country, from all walks of life, of all
ages, and that the observance should extend beyond our shores to the people of the
world.”51 At one of the commission’s first meetings, three objectives were set:
! to stimulate Lincoln observances throughout the year by public and private
bodies at home, and abroad, if possible;
! to encourage and to itself undertake contributions of lasting value, such as the
preparation and completion of additional Lincoln historical works; and

49

Final Report of the Lincoln Sesquicentennial Commission, pp. 7-8.

50

Ibid., pp. 10-11.

51

Ibid., p. xiii.

CRS-16
! to emphasize the contribution of Lincoln’s thoughts, ideas, and actions to the
United States and the world.52

To accomplish its objectives, the commission employed “every conceivable
avenue of communication.” In the United States, the commission worked with state
and local sesquicentennial commissions; historical societies, national civic, fraternal,
educational, religious, and media groups; trade associations; labor unions; the press
and the broadcasting media; motion pictures; clubs; societies; business and industry
associations; and interested individuals throughout the country.53
Commission Publications. At one of its first meetings, the commission
adopted the thematic slogan: “Lincoln: Symbol of the Free Man,” and subsequently
focused on this theme in all of its publications. The Lincoln Sesquicentennial
Handbook of Information contained an explanation of the commission’s objective, a
brief chronology of important dates in Lincoln’s life, a brief biographical sketch in
Lincoln’s own handwriting, a list of special commission projects, famous Lincoln
quotations, and a selected bibliography. Another booklet, The Lincoln Ideals,
through the use of Lincoln’s own words, provided an insight into his personality and
life. A third major publication of the commission was its official newsletter, The
Lincoln Sesquicentennial Intelligencer.54
Role as Coordinator of Sesquicentennial Activities Nationwide.
Through consultation with the U.S. Office of Education, and the National Education
Association and its many affiliated groups, the commission also was able to create a
program for participation in the sesquicentennial observance by America’s youth.55
“One of the most gratifying developments of the Sesquicentennial Year was the
enthusiasm and sentiment with which State historical societies devoted themselves to
the observance and the additional establishment of State Lincoln Sesquicentennial
Commissions.”56 In many states, Governors issued special proclamations to which
additional proclamations were added by local mayors. Additional support was
provided by a number of individual government agencies within each state as well as
several state boards of education.
Although Kentucky, where Lincoln was born, Indiana, where he grew up, and
Illinois, where he spent his adult life, were the first to plan extensive commemorative
programs, numerous other states followed suit. “Celebrations, commemorative
programs, and other Sesquicentennial activities held throughout the country were
legion.”57

52

Ibid., p. xiv. For a detailed list of commission objectives, see: Ibid., p. 9.

53

Ibid., p. xv.

54

Ibid., p. 12, pp. 14-18.

55

Final Report of the Lincoln Sesquicentennial Commission, p. 19.

56

Ibid., p. 69.

57

Ibid.

CRS-17
An equally enthusiastic response to the sesquicentennial was evident among the
national organizations, trade associations, the business community, and industry. The
commission even went so far in its final report to suggest that “practically every
national civic, fraternal, educational, religious, women’s, youth, media, club, society,
business, and industry association, or other organizations of national scope, in some
way took note of the sesquicentennial and joined in honoring the memory of Abraham
Lincoln.”58
By securing the cooperation of the National Association of Broadcasters and
National Advertising Council and networks, the commission was able to gain the
support of “practically every radio and television station in the United States.” News
accounts of the sesquicentennial were widely reported, and special programs
commemorating Lincoln were carried on all major networks and on hundreds of
independent stations.59 Also, the commission was able to secure the “cooperation of
the newspaper and magazine publications to an extraordinary degree.” “Press
coverage of both national and local events was overwhelming,” the commission
concluded in its final report, and “seldom has there been a finer example of public
service by the Nation’s printed media.”60
Special Lincoln exhibits were prepared by the Library of Congress, National
Archives, Department of Justice, Smithsonian Institution, Lincoln Museum in Ford’s
Theater, the Medical Museum of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, and B’nai
B’rith.
Special commemorative observances during the sesquicentennial year were held
at the Washington National Cathedral; the Library of Congress; the State Reception
Room of the Apostolic Delegation to the United States, Washington, D.C.; and at
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.61
Publication of Lincoln Day By Day: A Chronology, 1809-1865. One
of the commission’s “earliest steps and perhaps the most important” resulted from its
“desire to accomplish some scholarly and important project that would be of lasting
value and endure over the years as an aid to scholars and researchers working in the
Lincoln field.” After considerable discussion of various projects that might be
undertaken and consultation with Lincoln scholars, the commission determined that
the “greatest contribution could be made by providing for one, largely scholarly
project—a day-by-day chronology of the life of Abraham Lincoln—which would
serve as a major historical guide to researchers, writers, and Lincoln scholars.”62 The
last of the three volumes of Lincoln Day By Day: A Chronology, 1809-1865 was
completed during the summer of 1960.

58

Ibid., p. 127.

59

Ibid., p. 137.

60

Ibid., p. 142.

61

Ibid., pp. 37-50.

62

Ibid., p. 31.

CRS-18
Artistic, Philatelic, and Numismatic Endeavors. The commission was
also the primary motivating force behind the Treasury Department’s decision to
redesign and reissue a new Lincoln penny as a feature of the sesquicentennial
observance, and was instrumental in the gaining approval for the series of four
commemorative postage stamps which were issued in honor of the 150th anniversary
of Lincoln’s birth.63
“Four very fine old oil paintings of Abraham Lincoln that,” in the commission’s
opinion, “deserved to be better known” were purchased for a moderate price and
displayed at the commission’s headquarters at the National Archives during the
sesquicentennial. Later, the paintings were presented to the Lincoln Museum for
public exhibition. At the ceremonies in New York commemorating the 75th
anniversary of the gift of the Statue of Liberty by the people of France to the people
of the United States, a bronze bust of Lincoln was presented on behalf of the
commission to the people of France.64
Sesquicentennial Activities Abroad. International participation in the
sesquicentennial was carried out in cooperation with the U.S. Information Agency,
Radio Free Europe, the State Department, the People-to-People Program, and
representatives of foreign countries. “Evidence of Lincoln’s worldwide influence,”
which was displayed in a broad range of “activities and intense interest in the
Sesquicentennial Year in foreign countries, prompted the commission to make a
lasting contribution to those countries in the form of a microfilm reproduction of the
Abraham Lincoln papers in the Library of Congress.” Altogether, 57 sets of the
microfilm, each containing 94 reels, were sent to those countries where microfilm
facilities were available. Those countries not possessing such facilities were presented
the nine-volume set of The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln.65
National Lincoln Sesquicentennial Dinner. On the eve of the
sesquicentennial of Lincoln’s birth, a dinner was given by the Lincoln Group of the
District of Columbia and the Lincoln Sesquicentennial Commission at the Statler
Hotel in Washington. President Dwight D. Eisenhower made remarks to the
gathering, actor Fredric March did a recitation, and the Right Reverend Richard S.
Emrich, Episcopal Bishop of Michigan, delivered an address on “Lincoln and the
Judgments of the Almighty.”66
Awards Bestowed. In accordance with the commission’s authorization to
“give suitable recognition ... to persons and organizations for outstanding
accomplishments in preserving” Lincoln’s writings and ideals, 88 individuals were
elected honorary commission members. An honorary medallion was given to 94

63

Ibid., pp. 61-68.

64

Quote is found at Ibid., p. 147. See also Ibid., pp. 148-149.

65

Ibid., p. 101.

66

U.S. Congress, Joint Committee on Arrangements on the Commemoration Ceremony in
Observance of the 150th Anniversary of the Birth of Abraham Lincoln, 1809-1959, Abraham
Lincoln Commemorative Ceremony at a Joint Session of Congress, H.Doc. 211, 86th Cong.,
1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1959), pp. 13-21.

CRS-19
individuals and institutions who made “outstanding contributions to the objectives of
the commission” during the Sesquicentennial year. “In recognition of outstanding
contributions and cooperation during the Sesquicentennial Year,” the commission
awarded certificates of appreciation to 97 organizations.67

Joint Meeting of Congress
Eleven months after creating the Lincoln Sesquicentennial Commission,
Congress provided for a joint session of Congress for commemorating the 150th
anniversary of the birth of Abraham Lincoln.68 The joint meeting of February 12,
1959, was presided over Speaker of the House Sam Rayburn. Attendees included
Vice President Richard M. Nixon; former Vice President Henry A. Wallace; members
of the Cabinet; the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court;
assistant heads of departments; heads of independent agencies, offices, and
commissions; chairman and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; ambassadors,
ministers, and charges d’affaires of foreign governments; and the director, assistant
director, and members of the Lincoln Sesquicentennial Commission.
The ceremonies began with an invocation by the House chaplain, Rev. Bernard
Braskamp. Academy Award winner Fredric March then read the Gettysburg Address,
followed by remarks from historian Carl Sandburg. Prelude music was played by the
U.S. Army Band Orchestra and several songs were sung by The Idlers, Choral Group
of Cadets, U.S. Coast Guard Academy. The Senate chaplain, Rev. Frederick Brown
Harris, delivered the benediction.69

Franklin D. Roosevelt Centennial Joint Committee
Congressional efforts to commemorate the centennial of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s
birth began in 1979 with proposals to “establish a Special Joint Committee on the
Centennial of the Birth of Franklin D. Roosevelt.” The committee was to be
responsible for: (1) arranging a special joint session on January 30, 1982, and (2)
acquiring by purchase at a fair market price, or by gift, “the manuscript, photographs,
and illustrations entitled ‘The Days of Franklin D. Roosevelt: A Chronicle’, prepared
by Pare Lorentz, and such other manuscripts, photographs, and illustrations” as
deemed appropriate. The proposal also authorized the printing of not more than
25,000 copies of manuscripts, together with photographs and illustrations the
commission might acquire.
S.J. Res 116 (96th Cong., 1st sess.), which contained these provisions, was
introduced by Senator Jennings Randolph of West Virginia. Randolph, as a freshman
Representative, served in the House during the Roosevelt Administration’s “First 100
Days.” Although the committee on Senate Rules and Administration held a hearing

67

Final Report of the Lincoln Sesquicentennial Commission, pp. 52-60.

68

P.L. 85-775, 72 Stat. 932-933.

69

Abraham Lincoln Commemorative Ceremony at a Joint Session of Congress, pp. 1-7.

CRS-20
on Randolph’s proposal, it took no further action on it, largely because of its
projected cost of $500,000.70
Subsequently, in 1981, private efforts were undertaken to encourage a variety
of celebrations to mark the Roosevelt birth anniversary. The key figure in these
efforts was Peter Kovler, a former speechwriter in the Department of Commerce
during the administration of President Jimmy Carter and former congressional staff
member. Kovler, with the support of his family’s Kovler Foundation, took the lead
in calling public attention to the Roosevelt centennial. He founded a private F.D.R.
National Centennial Commission, and served as its executive director. His publicity
efforts were instrumental in Congress’s decision ultimately to establish a joint
committee on centennial arrangements, albeit much smaller in scope than that
originally planned in the Randolph joint resolution.71
Late in 1981, Congress complemented Kovler’s effort with the establishment of
a Special Joint Committee on Arrangements to coordinate plans for a joint meeting
of the House and Senate to celebrate the Roosevelt anniversary and to coordinate
congressional activities with those sponsored by other organizations marking
Roosevelt’s birth. Representatives James Wright of Texas, Sidney Yates of Illinois,
and Claude Pepper of Florida submitted H.Con.Res. 220 on November 16, 1981. The
House Rules Committee reported the concurrent resolution the following day.72 The
House agreed to the concurrent resolution on November 20, 1981, by a vote of 34418.73 The Senate, in turn, agreed to H..Con.Res. 220 by voice vote on November 24,
1981.74

Membership of Joint Committee
House Concurrent Resolution 220 established a 16-member joint committee,
with its membership appointed as follows:

70

S.J.Res. 116 (96th Cong., 1st sess.); and U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Rules and
Administration, Commemoration of the 100th Anniversary of the Birth of Franklin Delano
Roosevelt, hearings, Dec. 12, 1979, 96th Cong., 1st sess. (Washington: GPO), 41 p. A
companion joint resolution, H.J Res. 423, was introduced in the House by Rep. Jim Wright
of Texas but was not acted upon.
71

Francis X. Clines, “Briefing,” New York Times, Dec. 26, 1981, sec. 1, p. 14. Also, see
Peter Kovler, “F.D.R.’s Centenary,” New York Times, July 5, 1981, sec. 4, p. 15.
72

U.S. Congress, House Committee on Rules, Providing for the Commemoration of the One
Hundredth Anniversary of the Birth of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, report to accompany
H.Con.Res. 220, H.Rept 97-339, 97th Cong., 1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1981).

73

“Providing for the Commemoration of the 100th Anniversary of the Birth of Franklin Delano
Roosevelt,” remarks in the House by Rep. Claude Pepper and others, Congressional Record,
vol. 127, Nov. 20, 1981, pp. 28595-28602.
74

“Providing for the Commemoration of the 100th Anniversary of the Birth of Franklin Delano
Roosevelt,” remarks in the Senate by Senators Howard Baker and Jennings Randolph,
Congressional Record, 97th Cong., 1st sess., vol. 127, Nov. 24, 1981, pp. 28963-64.
S.Con.Res. 76, a companion measure introduced by Senator Randolph on April 29, 1981, was
not acted upon by the Senate.

CRS-21
! The President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of
Representatives;
! Seven members of the Senate to be appointed by the President pro tempore,
four upon the recommendation of the majority leader of the Senate and three
upon the recommendation of the minority leader of the Senate; and
! Seven members of the House of Representatives to be appointed by the
Speaker of the House of Representatives, three upon the recommendation of
the minority leader of the House of Representatives.75

Appropriations
The concurrent resolution limited expenditures of the joint committee to
$25,000, to be paid from the contingent fund of the House of Representatives upon
vouchers signed by the chairman of the joint committee.

Objectives
The joint committee was charged, under the concurrent resolution, with three
specific functions:
! to make arrangements for a joint meeting of the Congress to be held in the Hall
of the House on January 27, 1982, or such other day as the Speaker of the
House might direct, to commemorate the centennial of the Roosevelt birth;
! to plan the proceedings for such joint meeting and issue appropriate invitations
for such meeting; and
! to coordinate the arrangements made by the joint committee with such
organizations that had been established to observe the Roosevelt centennial as
the joint committee deemed appropriate.

Organization and Staff
The concurrent resolution stipulated certain procedures to be followed by the
joint committee. It directed the members of the joint committee to select a chairman
and vice chairman from among its members, and required a majority of committee

75

Committee members appointed by President pro tempore of the Senate, Strom Thurmond
of South Carolina, were: Senators Mark Hatfield of Oregon, Charles McC. Mathias of
Maryland, Alfonse D’Amato of New York, Daniel Moynihan of New York, Jennings
Randolph of West Virginia, Wendell Ford of Kentucky, and Henry Jackson of Washington.
Congressional Record, vol. 127, Dec. 15, 1981, p. 31333; Senate Journal, 97th Cong., 1st
sess., Dec. 15, 1981, p. 686. Committee members appointed by the Speaker of the House of
Representatives, Thomas P. O’Neill of Massachusetts were: Representatives Charles Bennett
of Florida, Richard Bolling of Missouri, Claude Pepper of Florida, Sidney Yates of Illinois,
Hamilton Fish of New York, Marc L. Marks of Pennsylvania, and Cleveland Benedict of
West Virginia. Congressional Record, vol. 127, Dec. 8, 1981, pp. 29953-29954.

CRS-22
members to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The concurrent
resolution also stipulated that membership vacancies were to be filled in the same
manner in which the initial appointments were made. Peter Kovler served as
executive director of the joint committee without compensation.76

Joint Meeting
The joint meeting was held on January 28, 1982, beginning at 10 a.m. After the
arrival of the Senate in the House chamber, ceremonies formally commenced with the
invocation offered by House chaplain Rev. James David Ford. Speaker of the House
Thomas P. O’Neill then recognized Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., an historian of the
Roosevelt presidency, to deliver the principal address. His remarks were followed by
those of Senator Jennings Randolph and Representative Claude Pepper, with
Randolph alluding to his experiences in the House during the Roosevelt
Administration, and Pepper speaking from his perspective as a Senator during
Roosevelt’s terms. Averill Harriman, an ambassador to Russia during the Roosevelt
administration, had prepared remarks but, owing to laryngitis, could not deliver them.
His wife, Pamela Harriman, delivered his speech for him. Opera soprano Leontyne
Price performed a medley. Former Representative James Roosevelt spoke of his
father’s presidency, interspersing his remarks with recorded excerpts from some of
President Roosevelt’s more famous speeches. At 12:30 p.m., the joint meeting
formally closed with a benediction offered by Senate chaplain Rev. Richard C.
Halverson.77

Related Official Activities
Before Congress approved the establishment of the Joint Committee on
Arrangements, it had already acted to encourage government agencies to
commemorate the Roosevelt centennial, largely at the initiative of the F.D.R. National
Centennial Committee and Mr. Kovler.78 The Supplemental Appropriations and
Rescission Act for FY198179 provided an additional $200,000 to the Smithsonian
Institution to remain available until September 30, 1982. The House included the
money in its bill, earmarking the funds for the 100th anniversary of Roosevelt’s birth.80
The Senate Appropriations Committee initially did not support the House funding
76

Ann L. Trebbe, “Homage to a Hero,” Washington Post, Jan. 28, 1982, pp. C1, C9.

77

“Joint Meeting of the 97th Congress in Commemoration of the 100th Anniversary of the Birth
of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.” Congressional Record, vol. 128, Jan. 28, 1982, pp. 273-278.
78

Daniel M. Weintraub, “Fan Spearheading Plans for Roosevelt’s 100th Birthday,” Los
Angeles Times, Aug. 7, 1981, part 1, p. 9.

79

P.L. 97-12, 95 Stat. 14, 49.

80

“The Smithsonian should secure participation of other agencies such as the Library of
Congress and the National Archives in this observance. This appropriation will support a
broad range of commemorative programs, including special exhibitions at the National
Portrait Gallery and the National Museum of American History, lectures, seminars, symposia,
and performances.” U.S. Congress, House Committee on Appropriations, Supplemental
Appropriations and Rescission Bill, 1981, report to accompany H.R. 3400, H.Rept. 97-29,
97th Cong. 1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1981), p. 198.

CRS-23
decision.81 However, in conference, the House recommendation was ultimately
agreed to.82
With these funds, the Smithsonian organized a number of commemorative
exhibitions. At the National Museum of American History, an exhibit focusing on
Roosevelt as a communicator was held, using artifacts from the museum’s own
collections and items borrowed from the Roosevelt Library in Hyde Park, New York,
the New York Historical Society, and the Little White House Museum in Warm
Springs, Georgia.
The National Museum of American Art organized a special exhibit which opened
in January 1982, featuring works in its collection from the Works Progress
Administration’s art programs during the New Deal. Similarly, the Hirshhorn
Museum mounted an exhibition of art in its collection connected to WPA programs.
A special exhibition of Roosevelt portraits in the National Portrait Gallery collection
was mounted. The Smithsonian’s Office of Folklife Programs organized a birthday
concert and other festivities on January 29 and 30, 1982, including the re-staging of
a special White House concert held in 1939 in honor of the visit of King George VI
and Queen Elizabeth of Great Britain. The Woodrow Wilson Center held an “evening
dialogue” featuring William E. Leuchtenburg, a noted Columbia University historian
of the Roosevelt era.83
After the conclusion of the joint meeting, President Ronald Reagan hosted a
luncheon at the White House for 200 invited guests, including Roosevelt family
members in attendance at the joint meeting.84
Other celebrations were organized outside of Washington. A New York Stateorganized centenary celebration was held at the Hyde Park home of the late President
on January 30, 1982. The New York Roosevelt Centennial Commission, appointed
by Governor Hugh Carey, arranged for this program, which included a wreath-laying
at the President’s grave, the first-day sale of a new 20-cent Franklin Roosevelt
commemorative stamp, and public open house receptions at the Roosevelt library and
several neighboring historic mansions. The Roosevelt home itself was not open, being
81

“The Committee has not agreed to an unbudgeted House allowance of $200,000 to support
a series of programs marking the 100th anniversary of the birth of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.”
U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Supplemental Appropriations and
Rescission Bill, 1981, report to accompany H.R. 3512, S.Rept. 97-67, 97th Cong., 1st sess.
(Washington: GPO, 1981), p. 184.
82

U.S. Congress, House Committee on Appropriations, Making Supplemental and Further
Continuing Appropriations for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 1981, conference
report to accompany H.R. 3512, H.Rept. 97-124, 97th Cong., 1st sess. (Washington: GPO,
1981), p. 66.
83

The listing of Smithsonian-sponsored events is taken from a press packet issued by the
F.D.R. National Centennial Commission, undated, in Congressional Research Service
collections. See also, David Shribman, “‘Embarrassment’ of F.D.R. Riches on View,” New
York Times, Feb. 3, 1982, p. A20.
84

Marjorie Hunter, “F.D.R.’s Voice Stirs Emotions at Capitol,” New York Times, Jan. 29,
1982, p. A14.

CRS-24
then under repair for fire damage. A number of universities and other organizations
also held special seminars, exhibitions, or other celebrations to mark the anniversary.85
The United Nations hosted a conference in June 1982 honoring Roosevelt’s role
in creating the organization. Among those delivering speeches at the conference were
Henry Cabot Lodge, former United States ambassador to the United Nations; Jeane
J. Kirkpatrick, incumbent United States ambassador to the United Nations; Javier
Perez de Cuellar, United Nations Secretary General; and Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.86

Harry S Truman Centennial Joint Committee
Congress did not create a statutory commission to coordinate events relating to
the Harry S Truman centenary. Instead, several organizations collaborated informally
to encourage popular and scholarly events relating to the Truman presidency. Among
the principal groups were the Truman Library Institute, a non-profit organization
established to help support the programs of the Harry S Truman Presidential Library
in Independence, Missouri; the Independence Truman Centennial Committee, an
organization formed to coordinate events held in the late President’s home town; and
the Truman Centennial Committee, a group of Truman family members and Truman
administration officials, headed by Washington attorney Clark Clifford. Although the
Truman Library Institute contributed some funding to both the Independence Truman
Centennial and to programs hosted by the Truman Library itself,87 the broadest range
of activities was undertaken by the Truman Centennial Committee.
In Congress, a Special Joint Committee on Arrangements was established to
coordinate congressional events with those being arranged by the Truman Centennial
Committee. On May 11, 1983, identical concurrent resolutions were presented in the
House and Senate calling for the creation of the special joint committee. The House
concurrent resolution (H.Con.Res. 126), was submitted by Representative Ike Skelton
of Missouri, and cosponsored by each of the other Missouri Members of the House,
by Representative Claude Pepper of Florida, who had served with Truman in the
Senate, and by Majority Leader James Wright of Texas. Missouri Senators Thomas
Eagleton and John Danforth, introduced the concurrent resolution (S.Con.Res. 33)

85

“Centennial Commission is Formed For Roosevelt,” New York Times, Dec. 12, 1981, p. B3;
and Harold Faber, “Roosevelt’s Centennial Celebrated at Hyde Park; He is Needed ‘Now
More Than Ever,’ Carey Says,” New York Times, Jan. 31, 1982, sec. 1, p. 32.
86

“U.N. Luminaries of Past and Present Honor Roosevelt,” New York Times, June 17, 1982,
p. A3.
87

Records of the Truman Institute held at the Harry S Truman Presidential Library indicate
that the Truman Library Institute budgeted as much as $174,000 toward financial support for
centennial activities conducted by the Independence Truman Centennial program, the
programs of the Truman Library, and for activities of the Truman Centennial Committee in
Washington. However, it is unclear how much money was ultimately provided to these
entities. Telephone interview with Randall Sowell, archivist, Truman Presidential Library,
April 25, 2001.

CRS-25
in the Senate. The House agreed to the concurrent resolution on June 30, 1983, by
a vote of 382-5.88 The Senate never acted on its own concurrent resolution and,
instead, agreed to the House concurrent resolution by unanimous consent on July 29,
1983.89

Membership of Joint Committee
House Concurrent Resolution 126 established a 16-member joint committee with
its membership appointed as follows:
! The President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of
Representatives;
! Seven members of the Senate appointed by the President pro tempore: four
upon the recommendation of the majority leader of the Senate and three upon
the recommendation of the minority leader of the Senate; and
! Seven members of the House of Representatives appointed by the Speaker of
the House of Representatives: three upon the recommendation of the minority
leader of the House of Representatives.90

The concurrent resolution stipulated certain procedures to be followed by the
joint committee. It directed the members of the joint committee to select a chairman
and vice chairman from among its members, and required a majority of the
committee’s members to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The
concurrent resolution also stipulated that membership vacancies were to be filled in
the same manner in which the initial appointments were made. Representative Ike
Skelton of Missouri was chosen chairman of the joint committee, and Senator Mark
Hatfield served as vice chairman.91

88

Rep. Alan Wheat, Ike Skelton, and others, “Commemoration of the 100th Anniversary of the
Birth of Harry S Truman,” remarks of in the House of Representatives, Congressional
Record, vol. 129, 98th Cong., 1st sess., June 30, 1983, pp. 18291-18297.
89

Congressional Record, vol. 129, July 29, 1983, p. 21646.

90

Committee members appointed by President pro tempore of the Senate, Strom Thurmond
of South Carolina, were: Senators John C. Danforth of Missouri, Mark O. Hatfield of Oregon,
Charles McC. Mathias of Maryland, Jennings Randolph of West Virginia, Quentin N.
Burdick of North Dakota, Howard M. Metzenbaum of Ohio, and Thomas Eagleton of
Missouri. Congressional Record, vol. 129, 98th Cong., 1st sess., Nov. 15, 1983, p. 32540.
Committee members appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Thomas P.
O’Neill of Massachusetts, were: Representatives Claude Pepper of Florida, Sidney R. Yates
of Illinois, Ike Skelton of Missouri, Alan D. Wheat of Missouri, Gene Taylor of Missouri, E.
Thomas Coleman of Missouri, and Bill Emerson of Missouri. Congressional Record, vol.
129, 98th Cong., 1st sess., Oct. 5, 1983, p. 27294.
91

The Congressional Record contains no formal announcement of their selection for these
posts. However, a letter from Senator Eagleton to Representative Skelton, dated December
1, 1983, congratulates Skelton on his recent selection. Clark Clifford Papers, Manuscript
Division, Library of Congress.

CRS-26

Appropriations
The concurrent resolution limited expenditures of the joint committee to
$25,000, to be paid from the contingent fund of the House of Representatives upon
vouchers signed by the chairman of the joint committee.92

Objectives
The joint committee was charged, under the concurrent resolution, with three
specific functions:
! to make arrangements for a joint meeting of the Congress to be held on
Tuesday, May 8, 1984, in the Hall of the House, to commemorate the
centennial of the Truman birth;
! to plan the proceedings for such joint meeting and issue appropriate invitations
for such meeting; and
! to coordinate the arrangements made by the joint committee with the activities
of the Truman Centennial Committee.93

Organization and Staff
The joint committee was authorized to appoint an executive director who would
serve without compensation. It appears that Ms. Toni Arnett, the legislative director
to Representative Skelton, performed this function. The joint committee was also
authorized to accept such other volunteer services of individuals as it deemed
appropriate, although there is no public report to suggest that it did so, to adopt rules
respecting its organization and procedure, and to sit and act at such times and places
as it shall deem appropriate.94

Joint Meeting
The joint meeting of the House and Senate was held on May 8, 1984. The
ceremonies began with an invocation by the House chaplain, Rev. James David Ford.

92

“Commemoration of the 100th Anniversary of the Birth of Harry S Truman,” Congressional
Record, vol. 129, June 30, 1983, p. 18291. The actual expenses of the joint committee cannot
be readily determined. A review of the three quarterly editions of the Report of the Clerk of
the House issued from the date on which committee appointments were made up through the
end of the calendar quarter following the Truman centennial joint meeting shows no special
categorization of expenses by the joint committee. Most likely, individual expense vouchers
submitted by the joint committee were itemized among the thousands of miscellaneous
expenses paid from appropriated House funds.
93

Ibid.

94

No committee rules were ever published in the Congressional Record, and there is no
evidence from the Congressional Record that the joint committee ever met outside of
Washington.

CRS-27
Representative Ike Skelton delivered opening remarks as chairman of the Joint
Committee on Arrangements, followed by remarks from Representative Alan Wheat
whose congressional district encompassed Truman’s home in Independence, Missouri.
Brief addresses were delivered by Robert J. Donovan, a Truman biographer; former
Senator Stuart Symington, Secretary of the Air Force in the Truman Administration;
and Clark Clifford, a member of the Truman White House staff and chairman of the
Truman Centennial Committee. A medley of piano music was delivered by Daniel
Pollack, a musician whose early career Truman had championed. Concluding remarks
were delivered by Truman’s daughter, Mrs. Margaret Truman Daniel, and by Senator
Mark Hatfield, the vice chairman of the joint committee. Senate chaplain Rev.
Richard Halverson delivered the benediction to conclude the 90 minute-long joint
meeting.95

Related Official Activities
On the morning of the joint meeting, Librarian of Congress Daniel Boorstin
hosted a breakfast reception in honor of the Truman centennial celebration. In
addition to remarks by the Librarian, historian David McCullough read excerpts of
letters from Truman family members in Missouri to Truman in Washington after he
had assumed the presidency. Margaret Truman Daniel also commented on her
father’s love of history and books. The breakfast was attended by 200 dignitaries,
including Senators Jennings Randolph and Strom Thurmond. After the joint meeting,
President Ronald Reagan hosted a White House luncheon attended by Mrs. Daniel,
her family, members of the Joint Arrangements Committee, members of the board of
the Truman Centennial Committee, and roughly 100 other dignitaries.96
In the spring of 1983, in anticipation of the anniversary of President Truman’s
birth, Congress designated the Truman home in Independence, Missouri, as a national
historic site.97 In 1984, the United States Postal Service issued a commemorative
stamp in honor of the Truman centennial.98
President Ronald Reagan issued a proclamation declaring May 8, 1984, to be the
official “Centennial of the Birth of Harry S Truman,” and calling upon the American
people to “observe that day with appropriate ceremonies and activities in
remembrance of his many accomplishments and dedication to freedom and

95

“Joint Meeting Commemorating the 100th Anniversary of President Harry S Truman,”
Congressional Record, vol. 130, May 8, 1984, pp. 11327-11333. A later special order
speech period that day, in which House Members spoke or inserted remarks on the Truman
centennial appears at Ibid., pp. 11403-11421.
96

Henry Mitchell, “Wild About Harry: A Day of Tributes for Truman’s Centennial,”
Washington Post, May 9, 1984, p. B1. President Reagan’s remarks at the White House
luncheon appear in U.S. President (Reagan), Public Papers of the Presidents of the United
States 1984, Book I (Washington: GPO, 1986), pp. 645-647.
97

“An Act to Establish the Harry S Truman National Historic Site in the State of Missouri,
and for Other Purposes,” P.L. 98-32, 97 Stat. 193.
98

“Washington News,” United Press International Wire Service, Jan. 26, 1984, Lexis-Nexis
database.

CRS-28
democracy.”99 President Reagan also signed into law on May 8, 1984, an act which,
in part, provided for the awarding of a special congressional gold medal to President
Truman’s daughter in recognition of his service to the nation.100

Other Commemorative Events
Although the Joint Committee on Arrangements did not play a formal role in the
organization of other Truman centennial events, the Truman Centennial Committee,
the Truman Library and Library Institute, the City of Independence, and many other
organizations and institutions, both foreign and domestic, sponsored Truman
centennial observances. A number of governments and institutions also took note of
the Truman centennial. Several academic conferences and commemorative dinners
were held in Great Britain by universities and multinational organizations to mark the
Truman birth. The parliaments of Turkey and Israel issued proclamations
commemorating Truman’s birth. The Austrian government established a scholarship
fund named in Truman’s honor to permit American scientists to study in Austria.101
Among the conferences and symposiums held during the year leading up to the
anniversary of Truman’s birth were: conferences at Hofstra University, the John F.
Kennedy Library, the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, the
Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars in Washington, and the Smithsonian
Institution’s Resident Associates Program. Commemorative memorial services were
held at the Washington National Cathedral and at the First Baptist Church in
Washington. The Smithsonian Institution’s Air and Space Museum timed the opening
of an exhibition on the Berlin Airlift to coincide with the Truman centennial. Leading
members of the Truman Centennial Committee and the Truman Library and Library
Institute were frequent participants in these events.102

Commission on the Eleanor Roosevelt Centennial
The Commission on the Eleanor Roosevelt Centennial was established on
November 21, 1983, by P.L. 98-162, the Eleanor Roosevelt Birth Centennial
Commemoration Act.

99

“Proclamation 5148—Centennial of the Birth of Harry S Truman,” Public Papers of the
Presidents of the United States 1984, Book I, p. 86.
100

The act also provided for such gold medals to also be presented to Lady Bird Johnson and
to Elie Wiesel, in recognition for their achievements as well. “An Act To Authorize the
Awarding of Special Congressional Gold Medals to the daughter of Harry S Truman, to Lady
Bird Johnson, and to Elie Wiesel,” P.L. 98-278, 98 Stat. 173.
101

For a more comprehensive list of such actions and events, see “Harry S Truman,” remarks
of Representative Ike Skelton, Congressional Record, vol. 130, May 14, 1984, pp. E2133E2135.
102

See memorandum from Bryson Rash to Clark Clifford, July 16, 1984, manuscript
collection, Harry S Truman Library, and speech files in the Clark Clifford papers, Library of
Congress Manuscript Division.

CRS-29

Membership
The commission was composed of 13 members. In accordance with the
commission’s legislative charter its membership included:
! Two Representatives appointed by the Speaker of the House;
! Two Senators appointed by the President pro tempore of the Senate after
consultation with the Majority and Minority Leaders;
! The Director of the National Park Service, ex officio;
! The Archivist of the United States, ex officio;
! The Librarian of Congress, ex officio;
! The Governor of New York, ex officio;
! The County Executive of Dutchess County, New York, ex officio;
! Surviving children of Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt; and
! The Chairman of the Eleanor Roosevelt Institute, ex officio.

For a particular meeting of the commission, any member could appoint another
individual to serve in his place. Commission members served without compensation,
but were reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred in the discharge of
their duties.103

Public and Private Funding
The only federal funds provided the commission were for travel and subsistence
expenses. These expenses were not to exceed $10,000 and were to be drawn from
the operating budget of the National Park Service. All other money and services
necessary for carrying out the commission’s tasks were secured from private sources.
The commission actually spent only $1,732.62 in connection with two commission
103

97 Stat.1013-1014. Commission members appointed by President pro tempore of the
Senate, Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, were: Senators Daniel P. Moynihan and
Alphonse D’Amato of New York. Commission members appointed by the Speaker of the
House of Representative, Thomas P. O’Neill of Massachusetts, were: Representatives
Hamilton Fish, Jr. of New York, and Barbara B. Kennelly of Connecticut. Ex officio
members were Russell E. Dickenson, Director of the National Park Service; Robert M.
Warner, Archivist of the United States; Daniel Boorstin, Librarian of Congress; Mario
Cuomo, Governor of New York; Lucille P. Pattison, County Executive of Duchess County,
New York; and Trude W. Lash, chairman of the Eleanor Roosevelt Institute. The surviving
children of Mrs. Roosevelt who served on the commission were James Roosevelt, Elliott
Roosevelt, and Franklin D. Roosevelt, Jr. United States Commission on the Eleanor
Roosevelt Centennial, The Centenary of Eleanor Roosevelt, 1884-1984 (Poughkeepsie, NY:
Eleanor Roosevelt Centennial Commission, 1991), p. 6.

CRS-30
meetings.104 The commission was authorized to accept donations of money, supples
and services to carry out its responsibilities; and the Eleanor Roosevelt Institute was
authorized to provide staff assistance.105

Objectives
Congress charged the commission with responsibility for: (1) encouraging and
recognizing observances and commemorations throughout the United States that
commemorated the 100th anniversary of Eleanor Roosevelt’s birth in 1984, and (2)
providing advice and assistance to federal, state, and local government agencies and
to private organizations in establishing such commemorative observances. The
Eleanor Roosevelt Institute, a nonprofit organization incorporated in the State of New
York, and successor organization of the Eleanor Roosevelt Memorial Foundation
which had been chartered by Congress in 1963,106 was authorized to provide staff
assistance to the commission, and coordinate centennial policies and events. The
enabling act also directed the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the director of
the National Park Service, to complete the renovation of the Eleanor Roosevelt
National Historic Site at Val-Kill in Hyde Park, New York, in FY1984.107

Organization
The commission held the first of two meetings on February 2, 1984, at the
Library of Congress in Washington, where Trude Lash, chairman of the Eleanor
Roosevelt Institute, was elected commission chairman by its members. During the
session, Lash presented a report on the Institute’s “centennial programs in progress
and some of the contributions that had been made toward their realization,” and the
commission agreed to apprise the Governors of all 50 states “of the existence and
functions of the Commission and asked [them] to appoint someone to act as liaison
between the Commission and all local and state-level groups who were planning
commemorations.”108
Ultimately, the Governors of 42 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto
Rico, and the Northern Mariana Islands appointed individuals to act as liaisons
between the commission and all local and state-level groups planning
commemorations.109

104

Ibid., p. 8.

105

97 Stat. 1014.

106

77 Stat. 8-12.

107

97 Stat. 1014.

108

The Centenary of Eleanor Roosevelt, p. 6, 9.

109

Ibid., pp. 121-122.

CRS-31

Professional Staff
The Eleanor Roosevelt Institute provided staff assistance to the commission and
coordinated policies and events.

Projects and Activities
By the time the commission convened its first meeting, the official opening of the
centenary had already been marked by an ecumenical service in New York City. The
service was held on the evening of November 10, 1983, at the Cathedral of St. John
the Divine, where Mrs. Roosevelt had worshiped and where her memorial service had
been held in November 1962. A year in planning, this event portrayed Mrs.
Roosevelt’s religious ideals and reflected her social convictions.110
The Story of the “Eleanor” Traveling Museum. A traveling exhibit, “The
Roosevelt Special–Eleanor,” was one of the commission’s most important projects
because it “explicitly demonstrated Mrs. Roosevelt’s unmatched genius for reaching
people at their own level.” This unique 40-foot tractor-trailer museum contained “an
assortment of pertinent items that had surrounded Eleanor Roosevelt in her
lifetime—memorabilia, documents, photographs, artifacts of all kinds.” Altogether,
the traveling museum traversed 12 northeastern states and the District of Columbia
making 80 stops at “schools, malls, and plazas; at fairs and festivals, libraries, and
conferences; at places where people gathered and where the enormous trailer, blaring
music of another era and displaying an exuberant ‘Eleanor’ on its flank, would attract
them inside.”111
The tour lasted for seven months, through January 1985. Several different
organizations collaborated to create the museum. The New York State Office of
Special Projects staffed and scheduled the project; the Eleanor Roosevelt Institute
funded it, and provided guide uniforms and many of the educational materials
distributed at each stop; and the New York Bureau of Historic Sites outfitted the
museum.112
Eleanor Roosevelt Packet. A packet of informational materials designed
by the commission to educate the public about Mrs. Roosevelt was widely distributed
during centennial observances and when the traveling museum visited schools. When
distributed at schools, this packet also contained a “tour guide called ‘A Visit to the
Eleanor Roosevelt Traveling Exhibit,’ a selection of Eleanor Roosevelt quotations,
a bibliography, and a list of available films.” Also, an “‘Eleanor Roosevelt Curriculum
Kit’ designed for children from kindergarten through sixth grade was made up
especially for this packet by the United Nations Association’s Eleanor Roosevelt

110

Ibid., pp. 13-17.

111

Ibid., p. 18.

112

Ibid., pp. 22, 24.

CRS-32
Committee of Friends and Admirers.” Suggested classroom activities contained in the
packet were often sent ahead to schools in communities expecting a visit.”113
In addition, 12 new books about Eleanor Roosevelt were published between
1982 and 1984, and were noted in a Smithsonian Institution Eleanor Roosevelt
bibliography released in June 1984.114
Role as Coordinator of Centennial Activities Nationwide. In addition
to the traveling museum, there were numerous oral history projects, films and
television programs, exhibitions, plays, and concerts throughout the country that
focused on the centennial. According to the final report of the Eleanor Roosevelt
Centennial Commission, “the approach of Mrs. Roosevelt’s 100th birthday anniversary
on October 11, 1984, precipitated a nation-wide avalanche of celebratory activities
and a flood of newsprint, books, and articles.”115 In accordance with the law
establishing the commission, it provided assistance and advice to federal, state, and
local organizations that had observances and commemorations.
Awards. During the course of the centennial year, Eleanor Roosevelt awards
were given to people and organizations whose work and achievements in the world
community were similar to hers.116 These included:
! A special Eleanor Roosevelt Four Freedoms Award given in the Netherlands;
! An Eleanor Roosevelt Human Rights Award given to Andrei Sakharov and
Marian Anderson; and
! Community service awards given in the name of Eleanor Roosevelt.117

Commemorative Activities Abroad. On June 23, 1984, Simone Veil, a
former president of the European Parliamentary Assembly, received the special
Eleanor Roosevelt Centennial award during the Franklin D. Roosevelt Four Freedoms
Award ceremony at Middleburg in the Netherlands. Mme. Veil was a French
government official whose political career had paralleled that of Eleanor Roosevelt
in the vindication of the “public role of women in the 20th century.” She was honored
for “her personal courage in the struggle against tyranny and her commitment to a
united, secure and productive Europe [had] established her as an international leader
admirably representative of Eleanor Roosevelt’s legacy.”118
Created in 1951, the Four Freedoms Foundation has made national and
international awards given alternately at Hyde Park in the United States and
Middleburg in the Netherlands. The ties to Middleburg were based on the Roosevelt

113

Ibid., p. 23.

114

Ibid., p. 28.

115

Ibid.,p. 25.

116

Ibid., p. 32.

117

Ibid., pp. 32-40.

118

Ibid., pp. 33-34.

CRS-33
family’s Dutch roots. In 1987, the Foundation merged with the Eleanor Roosevelt
Institute to form the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute.119
The centennial was observed at Whitehall in London on November 28, 1984,
with a symposium, “The Legacy of Eleanor Roosevelt.” American ambassador
Kingman Brewster was one of the honorary chairpersons of the event. A ninemember advisory committee representing both Britain and the United States planned
the London symposium.120
Philatelic Endeavors. The Eleanor Roosevelt Commission’s culminating
event of the centennial year took place on October 11, 1984. The National Park
Service and the U.S. Postal Service helped with the planning of a four-part event at
Val-Kill, New York, the location of Mrs. Roosevelt’s former home,121 which included
an early morning wreath laying ceremony at Mrs. Roosevelt’s grave, the dedication
of Val-Kill as a National Historic site, a special luncheon for 250 of the people who
had played a part in the centennial celebration, and the official issuance of a new
Eleanor Roosevelt commemorative stamp.122
The 20-cent commemorative stamp was created by American graphic designer
Bradbury Thompson from a photograph of Mrs. Roosevelt taken at Val-Kill in
1960.123 This was the second Eleanor Roosevelt stamp. The first was issued in 1962.
China, Korea, Hungary, India, Israel, and Venezuela also honored Mrs. Roosevelt
with commemorative stamps.124

Dwight David Eisenhower Centennial Commission
The Dwight David Eisenhower Centennial Commission was established on
November 7, 1986, by P.L. 99-624.

Membership
The commission was composed of 21 members. In accordance with the
commission’s legislative charter its membership included:

119

Ibid., p. 34.

120

Ibid., pp. 57-58.

121

The legislation creating the Commission on the Eleanor Roosevelt Centennial had mandated
the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the National Park Service, to
“complete such improvements and development in the Eleanor Roosevelt National Historic
Site at Val-Kill in Hyde Park, New York, in fiscal 1984, as well as assure improved access
and availability sufficient to open the site to extensive public visitation.” 97 Stat. 1015.
122

Ibid., pp. 78-79.

123

The Centenary of Eleanor Roosevelt, p.87.

124

Ibid., p. 88.

CRS-34
! The President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of
Representatives, ex officio;
! Three Senators appointed by the President pro tempore upon recommendation
of the Senate Majority Leader;
! Three Senators appointed by the President pro tempore upon recommendation
of the Senate Minority Leader;
! Three Representatives appointed by the Speaker of the House upon
recommendation of the House Majority Leader;
! Three Representatives appointed by the Speaker of the House upon
recommendation of the House Minority Leader;
! Six Members appointed by the President of the United States ; and
! The Archivist of the United States, ex officio.125

Senator Robert Dole of Kansas and James D. Robinson III, the chairman of
American Express, were selected to be chairman and vice chairman, respectively, by
the commission from among its members. Members of the commission served
without compensation, but were provided an allowance for their travel expenses. The
same regulation applied to the commission’s executive director and other staff.126

Public and Private Funding
Congress appropriated $50,000 for the commission.127 The commission was also
authorized to accept “gifts or donations of money, property, or personal services.”128

125

P.L. 99-624, 100 Sat. 3497. Commission members appointed by President pro tempore of
the Senate, Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia, were: Senators Bob Dole of Kansas, J. James
Exon of Nebraska, Howell Heflin of Alabama, John Heinz of Pennsylvania, Nancy Landon
Kassebaum of Kansas, and John McCain of Arizona. Commission members appointed by
Speaker of the House of Representatives, Thomas S. Foley of Washington, were:
Representatives Beverly B. Byron of Maryland, Bill Emerson of Missouri, William F.
Goodling of Pennsylvania, David E. Price of North Carolina, Pat Roberts of Kansas, and Jim
Slattery of Kansas. Commission members appointed by the President were: Susan
Eisenhower, Maryland; Jane S. Gosden, California; George A. Horkan, Jr., Virginia; Drew
Lewis, Pennsylvania; James D. Robinson III, Connecticut; and Calvin A. Strowig, Kansas.
As provided by law, Don W. Wilson, Archivist of the United States, served on the commission
as well. U.S. Dwight D. Eisenhower Centennial Commission, The Eisenhower Centennial,
1890-1990: Across the Nation, Around the World (Dwight D. Eisenhower Centennial
Commission, n.d.), p. vii.
126

100 Stat. 3498.

127

P.L. 100-71, 101 Stat. 396.

128

P.L. 99-624, 100 Stat. 3498.

CRS-35

Objectives
Congress charged the commission with responsibility to “encourage, plan,
develop, and coordinate observances and activities commemorating” the centennial
of the birth of President Eisenhower on October 14, 1990. In this endeavor the
commission was to cooperate with (1) the Eisenhower World Affairs Institute in
Washington, D.C., (2) the Eisenhower Foundation in Abilene, Kansas, and (3) “such
other public or private entities as the Commission considers appropriate.” The
commission was also to “submit recommendations to Congress relating to a joint
meeting of ... Congress to commemorate” the centennial.129

Organization
In accordance with its mandate, and as directed by its establishing statute, the
commission carried out much of its work in coordination with the Eisenhower
Institute in Washington and the Eisenhower Foundation in Abilene, Kansas, as well
as with other governmental and private organizations. James D. Robinson III, vice
chairman of the commission, became chairman of the Eisenhower Centennial
Foundation that had been established by the Eisenhower Institute.130 These
arrangements permitted the commission to conduct many of its operations through
the foundation, with Mr. Robinson effectuating direct coordination between the two
entities. At the same time, Senator Dole, as chairman, was able to coordinate
commission activities directly with those in Congress and other governmental entities.
The Eisenhower Foundation operated at the time (and still does) in conjunction
with the Eisenhower Presidential Library, Eisenhower Center, and Eisenhower
Museum in Abilene. For this centennial, the Eisenhower Institute established an
Eisenhower Centennial Foundation to coordinate and conduct observances.131 Both
Kansas and Pennsylvania also established Eisenhower Centennial Commissions to
coordinate activities in those states. In Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, where Eisenhower
resided in his later years, organizations participating in centennial observances
included the Dwight D. Eisenhower Society, Gettysburg College, and the Eisenhower
National Historic Site. Other organizations participating in these observances
included Columbia University in New York City, The Eisenhower Medical Center in
Rancho Mirage, California, The Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships in Philadelphia,
People to People International in Kansas City, and Sister Cities International. Finally,
the United States Mint and the U.S. Postal Service cooperated in numismatic and
philatelic activities.132

129

Ibid., p. 3497.

130

Ibid., p. 3.

131

Ibid., p. 4.

132

Ibid., p. 78.

CRS-36

Professional Staff
The relation of the commission to the Eisenhower Institute and the Eisenhower
Centennial Foundation enabled it to work principally through the staff of these
entities. The executive director of the Eisenhower Institute, Jane Kravtovil, also
served as executive director for the commission.

Projects and Activities
Publications and Productions. Because of its approach of carrying out its
activities principally through private organizations, it appears that the commission
produced no publications of its own (other than reports mandated by its establishing
statute) and sponsored none. Its final report, however, included a list of “Books on
Eisenhower Published in the Last Decade,”133 as well as a survey of commemorative
activities undertaken by the commission and other organizations during the centennial
year.
The Eisenhower Institute funded a production by National Video
Communications of a television special, “The Eisenhower Legacy,” for broadcast on
the Discovery Channel in 1991. Two directors of the institute also served as program
advisors. Based on more than 40 interviews with Eisenhower associates, the
documentary focused on crises during Eisenhower’s presidency, including the 1956
Hungary and Suez crises, and the Little Rock desegregation crisis of 1957.134
Legislative Enactments. On October 3, 1988, President Ronald Reagan
signed into law P.L. 100-467,135 directing the U.S. Mint to issue a commemorative
Eisenhower silver dollar. Four million of the Eisenhower dollars were minted through
the end of 1990. Congressional members of the commission took the lead in
promoting this legislation, including commission chairman Senator Bob Dole, who
introduced the bill in the Senate, and Representative William Goodling, who did so
in the House. Subsequently, on October 10, 1990, President Bush issued the
proclamation authorized by P.L. 101-258,136 declaring October 14, 1990, as Dwight
D. Eisenhower Day.137
On October 15, 1990, President Bush signed P.L. 101-427,138 designating the
interstate highway system the Dwight D. Eisenhower System of Interstate and
Defense Highways. It was during President Eisenhower’s Administration that the
interstate highway system was first conceived and authorized, and during which its

133

Ibid., pp. 73-75.

134

Ibid., p. 12.

135

104 Stat. 1086.

136

104 Stat. 118.

137

“Proclamation 6199—Dwight D. Eisenhower Day, 1990,” Weekly Compilation of
Presidential Documents, v. 26 Oct. 14, 1990, pp. 1568-1570.
138

104 Stat. 927.

CRS-37
development began. The legislation was initiated in Congress by Senator John Heinz,
a member of the commission, and cosponsored by several commission members.
On October 24, 1990, President Bush signed P.L. 101-454,139 establishing a
permanent endowment for the Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships. The fellowships
had been established in 1953 to enable individuals in mid-career in other countries to
travel to the United States for three months of observation, seminars, and professional
discussions. The measure was introduced by Senator Dole and cosponsored by
several other commission members.
Other Governmental Actions. In conjunction with commemorative
activities in Kansas described below, on October 13, 1990, the U.S. Postal Service
issued a new Eisenhower commemorative stamp.140
During 1990, the United States Military Academy at West Point established the
Dwight D. Eisenhower Program of Graduate Studies in Leader Development, leading
to a master of arts degree. At their graduation ceremony on May 31, 1990, the first
four officers to enter this program received an Eisenhower commemorative coin.141
Role as Coordinator of Centennial Activities Nationwide.
Kansas. National commemorations of President Eisenhower’s centennial
opened on January 26, 1990, with a ceremony conducted by the Kansas Eisenhower
Centennial Commission. Mementoes of President Eisenhower, including an
Eisenhower commemorative coin, were placed in a time capsule that was later buried
on the centennial day, October 14, to be retrieved on the bicentennial of Eisenhower’s
birth.142
Other early events in the centennial year were presented in Abilene, Kansas,
under the aegis of the Eisenhower Center there. On June 5, 1990, the Center held a
conference on “Remembering Little Rock: Civil Rights in the 1950s,” which was
addressed by both Eisenhower’s Attorney General, Herbert Brownell, and former
Arkansas Governor Orval Faubus, and was attended by several of the nine students
who in 1957 initiated the desegregation of Central High School.143
This conference occurred in conjunction with the Center’s “Fabulous Fifties
Week,” which began on June 2 and included appearances by several popular
entertainers of the period.144 June 10 marked the arrival in Abilene of the “Five Star
Tour,” two caravans of vehicles that had started from opposite ends of the state, and

139

104 Stat. 1063.

140

The Eisenhower Centennial, 1890-1990, p. 13.

141

Ibid., p. 38.

142

Ibid., p. 34.

143

Ibid., p. 33.

144

Ibid., p. 28.

CRS-38
one of which included the U.S. Mint’s “Coin Car” featuring blowups of the
Eisenhower Centennial coin.145
Subsequently, addresses on Eisenhower were presented in Abilene by Vice
President Dan Quayle on July 5, former President Ronald Reagan on July 27, and
former President Gerald Ford on August 5.146
Centennial activities in Abilene concluded on October 13 and 14 with
observances entitled “An American Homecoming: In Celebration of Ike.” These
events included a visit by the “Dwight D. Eisenhower,” General Eisenhower’s World
War II staff train, from its permanent home in the National Railroad Museum in Green
Bay, Wisconsin, and by Eisenhower’s first presidential aircraft, the Columbine II,
which flew over Abilene. The plane’s owner had recently restored it after discovering
its identity. The program also included the premiere of a film, “Dwight D.
Eisenhower–American,” first day issuance ceremonies for the Eisenhower
commemorative stamp, a performance by the First Infantry Division Band, an air
show, a World War II encampment with recreations of other scenes from that conflict,
and a concluding multimedia performance.147
An ecumenical service on Sunday, October 14, included addresses by Richard
Halverson, chaplain of the U.S. Senate; evangelist Billy Graham; Senator Dole and
other congressional members of the commission who represented Kansas; Winston
Churchill II, Member of the British Parliament and grandson of the Prime Minister;
General Colin Powell, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, representing President
Bush; and President Eisenhower’s son John S.D. Eisenhower.148
Washington, D.C. The nation’s capital was the other chief location for many
events commemorating Eisenhower’s centennial. On October 3, 1990, the
Eisenhower Library, together with the National Press Foundation, served as host of
a symposium at the National Press Club in Washington on media coverage of first
families. David Eisenhower, grandson of President Eisenhower, participated in the
event.149
On October 4, the Eisenhower Institute, together with the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration (NASA), sponsored “The Eisenhower Centennial Space
Roundtable: A Look to the Future,” chaired by Eisenhower Institute senior fellow
Karl Harr. The objective of the program, presented on the 33rd anniversary of the
1957 launch by the Soviet Union of “Sputnik,” the first artificial Earth orbiting

145

Ibid.

146

Ibid., pp. 28-29.

147

Ibid., pp. 30-32.

148

Ibid., p. 32.

149

Ibid., p. 15.

CRS-39
satellite, was to consider the purposes of space exploration after the end of the cold
war.150
On October 11, the United States Information Agency (USIA) Alumni
Association and the Public Diplomacy Foundation held a symposium on “Eisenhower
and the USIA,” together with a dinner, at the National War College at Fort McNair.151
On October 11-13, People-to-People International, an organization established
by President Eisenhower in 1956, held its Worldwide Conference in Washington.
Several associates of President Eisenhower participated in the conference, and
commission member Susan Eisenhower, Eisenhower’s granddaughter, presented the
Eisenhower Medallion for “an ... exceptional contribution toward advancing
Eisenhower’s principles” to Maxwell Rabb, a member of Eisenhower’s White House
staff and former Ambassador to Italy.152
On October 14, the centennial of Eisenhower’s birth itself, the Kennedy Center
for the Performing Arts sponsored a Centennial Salute to Eisenhower, entitled
“Remembering Ike,” in its Eisenhower Theater. Hosts for the event were Senator
Charles Percy of Illinois and actress Helen Hayes. The program included excerpts
from the television documentary “The Eisenhower Legacy” (described under
“publications and productions”) and remarks by commission member Susan
Eisenhower, other family members, officials of Eisenhower’s Administration

[Text truncated at 120,000 characters. The full text is on the page linked above.]

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/crs%3ARL30980. Public record. Not legal advice.
